This is fascinating. I have an honours degree in mathematics - though my area of interest was primarily functional analysis. Thanks for your videos. Can I ask, when we say s3(ob) iff s1 + s2 =< 1, should we not just make the inequality strict? That way we have no ambiguity? Sorry if the answer is obvious! Keep up the great videos.
Thanks for the good question. The issue is: should a sector formed from two perpendicular lines, ie a right angle, or a spread of 1, be considered to be acute, obtuse, both or neither? I am inclined to the answer: both.
This is a symmetric solution, similar to the idea that the number 0 is both positive and negative.
This is fascinating. I have an honours degree in mathematics - though my area of interest was primarily functional analysis. Thanks for your videos. Can I ask, when we say s3(ob) iff s1 + s2 =< 1, should we not just make the inequality strict? That way we have no ambiguity? Sorry if the answer is obvious! Keep up the great videos.
Toxie207 1 year ago
Hi Toxie207,
Thanks for the good question. The issue is: should a sector formed from two perpendicular lines, ie a right angle, or a spread of 1, be considered to be acute, obtuse, both or neither? I am inclined to the answer: both.
This is a symmetric solution, similar to the idea that the number 0 is both positive and negative.
njwildberger 1 year ago
This video stopped at around 6:16 and would not go any farther.
grichard24 1 year ago