FOX Business: Pamela Geller vs Black Panthers Leader Malik Shabazz

[Chordiegurl]

'you can't run the prophet muhammed in a huggy bear costume' - oh no my life never be complete. This "woman" talks trash.

[farerse]

@TheAwokenMind stupid, just because someone isn't black doesn't mean they are white. the woman in this video is jewish. do you think chinese people or turkish people are white too?

[jerico641]

The commentator sees no problem with comparing the building of a mosque with the burning of holy book. Does anyone else see the problem with that?

[SeedOfTruth777]

@lokhryu ,,Only an Idiot would say something as Racist an Stupid as that!

[guymassive]

Shabazz spanked on all of thus Hypocrites. They all started back pedaling. Wow.

[phonicz10453]

i have studied islam and islam has conquered all over the world for centuries! they want to desttroy you if you dont convert to islam they want to force3 there religion on the masses!

[Keileyz]

@phonicz10453

And? Christians were the ones that exterminated the Native Americans, enslaved the Africans and wiped out the Aboriginal Australians. I am far more afraid of them than I will ever be of Muslims.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz Native Americans (and Canadians) havent been wiped out. Africans enslaved Africans before "Christians" ever embarked on political gain from capable competing European empires and without the assistance of Africans, the trade never would have happened (off of the West African coast predominantly), because on the north east coast, Muslims were enslaving them for FAR longer, and on and on...If you are afraid of Christians more than Muslims, than one might conclude you're a Muslim.(Cont.)

[Keileyz]

@NilDesperandum777

And how does Africans enslaving Africans disprove my point that Christians enslaved, exterminated and raped themselves and others? It doesn't. The slave trade would have happened regardless of how many Africans traded fellow Africans as Europeans were just as likely to kidnap than buy people. Entire regions in Africa were controlled by Europeans and were not going to buy what could be gotten for free.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz In that there is no Christian moral precept that one could attribute those actions to as being a function of Christianity rather than the actions of those who profess to be Christian yet act in direct opposition to it. Africans enslaving Africans also distorts the matter as a stand alone as though slavery is or ever was, a solely Christian outlier enterprise. That the enterprise of slavery was colonial rather than Christian in nature. The same CANT be said for Islam then or NOW.(Cont.)

[Keileyz]

@NilDesperandum777

The Bible testaments themselves say nothing to criticize the institution of slavery; in fact they mention servitude repeatedly as something routine and normal. Therefore, as the Christian religion does not forbid it, one cannot say it is "unChristian" to enslave others. Indeed, the Bible mentions the benefits of converting non-believers into believers, as well as the punishment for those non-believers who would not convert, such as gratuitous violence.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz In fact it does, but does so under the rubric of what is entailed in The Kingdom of God. And the fact that the mention of slavery and servitude was mentioned as something as normal, was for the simple fact that it was, two thousand years ago. And while Christianity didn't exist per se, two thousand years ago, Christ certainly redefined the parameters of power structures and the definition of servitude. And when you say "the Bible" prescribing non-believers - where specifically?

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz (From Cont.) Positing a hypothetical in the face of evidence supporting African participation with European and Middle Eastern trading partners, doesn't buffer against the obvious correction. That Islam is both political and religious in it's application casts it's past and present participation as slave mongers in a completely different apprehension. Proof positive was and is the CHRISTIAN moral opposition to slavery then and now, vs Islam's continued practice and prescription of it.

[Keileyz]

@NilDesperandum777

What I posited was not so nearly a hypothetical as a known fact: Europeans did simply kidnap many Africans, rather than trade for them. Likewise, Arabs did the same thing. In both these cases, neither Islam nor Christianity were primarily to blame, but neither of the two religions forbade slavery, and both include examples supportive of it within their religious texts. Christians only gained a moral opposition to slavery later.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz Certainly they did. But that's not a valid reason to point to Christianity and say that the actions of commercial marauders could be interpreted as something prescriptive from the teachings of Christ. One could point to Islam however and link the action to the teaching. So I disagree with your claim that Islam wasn't primarily to blame -- of course it was, and is today where archaic societal atrocities remain normative in the collective Muslim mind. A far cry from the Christian one.

[Keileyz]

And though Muslims did enslave others, they also did the same to their own, and they never wiped out entire races, using their religion as a pretext for doing so like the Christians did. So the Christians have a worst history and thus are more dangerous. White Christians have carried out more massacres than any other group combined yet somehow think they can preach to the world about kindness and tolerance.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz But Armenians would differ with that opinion wouldnt they? And as for wiping out entire races, that's an erroneous accusation on a number of grounds, not the least of which is the impossibility of ascribing the aims of empire as something Christian and theological in nature. . Islam on the other hand not only calls for the removal of nations (Israel) but in the name of "allah" has attempted definable, provable genocide. (Cont.)

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz (From Cont.) And the fact that you spotlight your perception of history as being correct without a modicum of lucid historical context, begs the question, why do you need to distort history into such a bizarre narrative when correcting your claim is as easy as pushing a button? Are you a Muslim? And if so, are you attempting to contrive a non-existent history the way Mohammed contrived a non-existent history of Christianity? (Cont. 2.)

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz (From Cont.2.) As for "white Christians", it is "white Christian" democracies that the Islamic world is trying to emulate while ignoring all of the foundational mechanisms that produced it, and not the other way around. It is people from around the world that clamor these same maintained cultures, not the other way around. And it is Muslims from any measurement, that in history and in the present, continue to war against non0Muslim society BECAUSE Islam says to, and not in spite of it.

[Keileyz]

@NilDesperandum777

The world is trying to emulate humanistic democracy, not "white Christian" democracy. Democracy began with the pagan Ancient Greeks, not Bible-thumping priests. Today, it is practiced all over the world, including in places like Japan and Singapore, where the most prominent religions are Buddhism. Conversely, in places where Christianity is rife like Russia, democracy is nowhere to be found.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz So you're claiming that what the West has known as democracy, it's application of law and focus on the grand welfare of it's society is a result from Ancient Greek virtue? Let me point out, that the option isn't pagan Greece vs "Bible-thumping" (Early 20th cent. American southern Baptists?) priests...(Cont)

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz (From Cont.) And if you think that democracy as practiced in the West is somehow antithetical to the practice of other religions that dont seek to usurp it's welcoming society (ie Islam), then you dont understand it's history/mechanism. Humanism, and by this you actually mean Atheism I take it, has a far more damning record of intolerance...so the claim -- yours or Christopher Hitchens -- that Humanism is somehow responsible for the tolerance present, here and now, is unfounded.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz (From Cont.) I'd also say this, that if you're living in a western democracy, today, 2011, and you have been for your life or most of it, then there is a reason you live in the west and not in a Muslim country. If you want to spout tree-hugging definitions of "tolerance" and "preference" then perhaps you should live in one of those societies at it's average level. I'd wager sooner rather than later, your fear of Christians and tolerance of Muslims via respective societies, would reverse

[Keileyz]

First, the Western country I live in is non-religious. Second, I lived in a Muslim country called Kuwait as a child and lived fine there. It was not perfect, but my ethnic group was not exterminated there. Many Muslims countries have a low average living level because of the people themselves, not the religion.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz I'd wager that the Western country you presently reside in, may have made relatively recent claims as being "non-religious" or secular, but if it is a Western country, then without fail, it has been, a "white Christian" country, and as result of your present choice, you now live off of the work and intent of like minded inhabitants that bled to maintain THEIR CULTURE. If you want to believe that none of that matters, then by all means explain why you live there now and not in Kuwait.

[Keileyz]

@NilDesperandum777

I don't know what you're talking about. My point remains that Christians have been privy to great atrocities.

[NilDesperandum777]

@Keileyz Being privy to and espousing it as a specific doctrinal prescription (as in the case of Islam) are two different things. I'm sure African Animists with a penchant for worshiping in cartwheels may have also been privy to it. The fact that Christians were also privy to slavery's end in the West is something one could correctly assert was as a direct result of being Christian.

[phonicz10453]

@phonicz10453 diffrent chapter same book my friend!

[27druiz]

Weekly Jihad Report: Sep 10 - Sep 16 = Jihad Attacks = 38, Allah Akbars = 3, Dead Bodies = 218, Critically Injured = 531

[smoothALOE]

Take the words of Malik Shabazz and pretend that Ron Paul is saying it. There ARE some similarities about the causes of 9/11. I'm not saying that Ron Paul is the same as Malik, but just think about it, hehe...

[osiris6364]

they try to paint muslims as terrorists so your average joe american wont notice that since 911 we have lost about 4000 soldiers but we have killed more than a MILLION iraqis (predominately civilians), with many more being forced from their homes...and if average joe does notice, he won't feel bad because the news said they were all extremist muslim terrorists

[Jesuitism]

@osiris6364

Racism is an integral part of war. That is people like Geller are given spots in the mainstream media so easily.

[osiris6364]

@Jesuitism exactly

[Deke1]

@osiris6364 who is THEY??? Try not to let facts get in the way of your rantings, muslim extremists are terrorists, not all muslims and there wasn't a million people killed by US soldiiers, only aproximently 10,000 in Iraq, the other 100,000, that's right, 100,000 not a million were killed by iraqi on iraqi violence tribal disputes/civil war and terrorists.. I guess you forgot all those truck bombs going off in markets, and suicide bombers

the NEW black panthers are a racist organization

[osiris6364]

@Deke1 extremist/ terrorist are labels to separate people from their humanity which makes them easier to hate...i was almost taking you serious until you said that the iraqis mostly killed themselves which is ridiculous...where are you getting these "facts", we killed more than 10,000 iraqis in the first 2 yrs

[Deke1]

@osiris6364 have you heard of the civil war in the country, what part of that did you miss.....bombing of mosgues, truck bombs in markets killing hundreds at a time, sunni and shiite fighting each other killing each other on a daily basis...more were killed by the iraqis than from Americans, those are the facts..

[osiris6364]

@Deke1 where'd you get those "facts"....FOX news?

[Deke1]

@osiris6364 CRS report to congress...,,,,go read

[hamzah938]

Since when do the Black Panthers speak for Islam? Why wasn't there a better representative from Islam invited?

[aspieboi318]

@94jetsfan My point exactly. Racists come in all colors. And I'm black and I know that Malik is an embarrassment to my race. He only represents himself.

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 you are an embarrassment to your race

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 To the degree that a person controls a people, it is to that degree that you lack offense to him. But the person that is not under his control is the most offensive of all. You being black are fooled by whites into believing that anyone representing black power is an embarrassment to your race when in fact you should be proud that someone is willing to do what you should be doing,but instead you chose to follow the logic that whites have programmed you with,that black power is wrong

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 You have no point because you cannot see that the entire argument these news channels have with black power and the new black panther party is their form of white power, by demonizing these black power groups it trains viewers into accepting that unless you are all equally bowing down to the whites justice system and taxation, that this is what will happen to you, you will be demonized. You have eyes but see not, ears but hear not, for you are a rebellious house.

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 I speak from nation custom, national language; the national language of the Akibulan black man. You speak from tribal custom, tribal language; the tribal language of the American oppressed and controlled black man. The white man once wrote in the dictionary, the meaning of the word racist. But when blacks learned to read as a whole, it was then outlawed by white man that you must refer to the word 'Racism' to find the definition for 'Racist'. I will then teach you the definition.

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 Racist, or a Racist is a person who researches, studies and participates in the improvement and/or advancement of their particular race. The white man then used this word, being opposite in meaning from the word 'Racism', as a word to refer you to the definition 'Racism' so that all black people who would rise as Racist would be outlawed as promoters of 'Racism' and to stir up confusing which then causes ignorance of blacks to use something they call a "Race card" as a red flag.

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 You will not agree with what I have told you but what I have told you is truth, Malik Zulu Shabazz is a Racist and so should all black man be if he really understood what it meant to be a Racist. There is no difference from the words Activist, Physicist, Chemist, Adventurist, Agriculturalist and so forth and so on. White man made all these words to end in the same to represent the same ideal, but because American black man still speak tribal language, he does not know this.

[jayu404]

@aspieboi318 If you do not believe what I have told you, look up the word Racist on any official dictionary website, since you have internet obviously. You will not find the definition to the word Racist, it will transfer you to the word Racism. This is a secret agreeable fact among the oppressor that gave you the idea that Malik Zulu Shabazz was an embarrassment to your race.

[aspieboi318]

Malik shabazz = embarrassment to black people. I am black btw.

[FatalityTTT]

@aspieboi318 shut up clown malik speaks the truth retard.

[94jetsfan]

@FatalityTTT what are you talking about? he is a racist ass hole who doesnt speak the truth! how is he telling the truth? please i would love to hear it

[FatalityTTT]

@94jetsfan what the hell are u talking about every thing he said in the video is true idiot. THe bigotry towards islam and the value that its brought towards the world. How past presidents secretly studied the quran, how the prophet muhammed inside the supreme court. Where is the proof that muslims were involved? How osama was funded byt the cia and bush. THe hijackers were saudis yet we have great realtions with them. You need to educate your self and not fall for main stream propoganda.

[nem700]

@aspieboi318

you're a goddamn fool.

[desibhoot]

Hey let stupid b*tch speak but keep the smart black guy quiet

[lmswentzeljr]

2 bigiots debating each other, real nice.

[Reidsmith1000]

This makes it so clear. It's not about us, it's about them. We should learn our lesson and be browbeaten or worse into submitting to them. He's proving Pamelas point.

[Maykhana]

Black Panthers Leader Malik Shabazz we muslim loveeeeeeeeeee u

nice job get these ppl who doesnt know shit about any thing

[GODIZWITANIGGA777]

joey jackson with his white guy voice lol

[xian090]

what would happen if the whole world went electric RIGHT now and all forces pulled out of the middle east? You would have no more exuses for terrorist attacks, NO more excuses for PC politicians helping you come into other countries and get special treatment. You would have to immigrate and act like everyone else or go back to the desert and be forgotten. So take full advantage of being attention whores while you can. you know its your only hope of leaving that litter box you call home.

[LTGhostRiley]

Mr Shabazz brought up very good questions. Nobody could answer him because they have NO answers and they continue with their immature accusations.

[smithandcarlos]

The host should be impartial - he clearly is not.

Geller demonstrates her intellectual and moral bankruptcy yet again! Someone should tell her to stay at home. What kind of inbred imbecile admires Geller?

Why not let Shabazz speak? Because they have no answer to the issues he raises!

[Zeno1999]

@smithandcarlos < Malik is an idiot; he keep saying learn from Islam and about Islam. Non-Muslims learning way more than Muslim sheep, parroting its satanic verses. Atleast, we know it's not a religion of peace.

Arabs are building Mosques faster than any other religions building their own religious sites. Malik would do well exploring his African roots than being an apologist for this cult. Or Malik could change his gender and wear a burka to keep out of trouble.

[smithandcarlos]

@Zeno1999

Your comment indicates you have little to no knowledge of Islam. Kindly shut the fuck up!

[Zeno1999]

@smithandcarlos < To your discomfort, more and more non-Muslima are reading your book(they are use to reading all sort of material- so another book is no big deal); finding it nothing more than plagiarized version of old/new testament with addendum for : fascist constitution. Also it has "final solution" for the non-believers (dhimmis, atheists, agnostics, witches beware).

You stfu; my reply was a form of Jaziya, I paid to you which of course not going to amuse you.

[smithandcarlos]

@Zeno1999

A quite meaningless response. Thank you.

I suggest if u want ti know about Islam (which you don't) you read books by respected authors, Muslims and non-Muslims.  Robert Spencer is not a 'scholar' - he is a hatemonger. It is a pity many North Americans (you included?) get their knowledge of Islam from inbred, illegitimate, semi-human imbeciles like him.

BTW your response IS amusing - a quite tepid nonsensical response.

[Zeno1999]

@smithandcarlos < Again 'scholar' word in Islamic dictionary is someone from Arabia who speaks Arabic and able to regurgitate Koranic verses without knowing its context and real meaning.

Yes, Robert Spencer is viewed as "hate monger " by radical Islamists (Ummah). His analysis is incisive and more and more non-Muslims especially liberals, you counting on, are learning about the dangers in coming years.{inbred, illegitimate, semi-human imbeciles, actually applies to all non-Muslims acc to Koran}

[smithandcarlos]

@Zeno1999

Would you regard David Duke as an authoirty on Judaism/Jews? Would you say his analyis is 'incisive'?

Spencer is a complete Islamophobe - he is not an academic. He peddles hate. Spencer and his daughter (also his sister and lover?) P Geller can be held largely responsible for the increase of Islamophbia in the US - eg burning mosques, stabbing Muslim taxi drivers.

BTW Muslims respect others of all faiths.

You accpet Spencer because like him you are an Islamophobe.

[Zeno1999]

@smithandcarlos < I don't have any phobias; you like to stay in your illusions, good luck.

[smithandcarlos]

@Zeno1999

You stay in your hatred of Islam/Muslims bubble.

[Zeno1999]

@smithandcarlos < Hating is not my nature; "Islamic/Muslim bubble" would burst on its own as their is not much there to sustain it. Look at all the systems based on illusion and how these disappear. Or to sustain their illusions, civilizations have gone bankrupt.

Criticizing out of love and to enlighten those with open mind.

[LTGhostRiley]

@smithandcarlos Agree. They have no answers to Malik's questions. Pam is indeed a bigot.

[ScientologyStoners]

LOL I got a smoking gun for you

[xian090]

what an idiot. in one sentence he says how we should be tolerant, and how the mosque is there for healing and blah blah, then he finishes it off saying how much arabs hate us all for the wars over there. which is it mr shazzam? fuckin idiot.

[smithandcarlos]

@xian090

Arabs should be 'tolerant' - even when you have killed over a million civilians in Iraq?  Yes, actually, killing over a million civilians for oil is not a reason for the US to be hated.

But when 3000+ Americans are killed then hatred and intolerance are the natural reactions?

Hypocrite!

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos I never said arabs *should* be tolerant. I'd say, yes, they do have the right to hate the US government. But be honest about it at least. stop pretending that you *want to be friends*. we all know most arabs hate US policies and many want to take it out on US civilians wherever possible, or try to take over its system by playing by/abusing its own rules.

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos and you say "you have killed", *I* didnt do anything. Yeah i think US foreign policy is shit, and alot of ppl have been killed for money/oil/power. But if you think terrorism is the right solution...jesus, why don't you people stick to bombing soldiers and military stations at least? by your logic, if you kill my brother, and i want vengence, but am not capable of beating you, I have the right to kill your children when your not looking. Does that sound right to you?

[smithandcarlos]

@xian090

I am a Muslim - 'terrorism' is clearly not permitted in Islam. I would never advocate the use of 'terrorism'.

I have no idea what you are talking about when u refer to Arabs using human shields, targeting civilians etc. Please elaborate.

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos you want me to elaborate on the human shields thing? I'm talking about the *resistance* taking the fight to within the cities walls. The fact that these people choose to blend in with the city population. With their families friends and neighbors (rather than admitting defeat). Hard headed, yes. Is there any honor to this? No. I would respect a country much more that would bow out and admit defeat, rather than use any and all means to resist. they are sacrificing their own ppl.

[smithandcarlos]

@xian090

Muslims do not bow down to oppression and tyranny.

Muslims are being persecuted. Please don't expect the persecuted to lie down and die.

[StoogeWatcher]

@smithandcarlos Islam SUPPORTS oppression and tyranny. Islam also supports misogyny and terrorism.

[smithandcarlos]

@StoogeWatcher

pls forward the evidence.

In formulating your response pls consider how many Muslims countries have illegally invaded another country, killed hundreds of thousands of civilians, tortured prisoners and still claim to be holier than thou - all in order to steal the resources of the other country.

The inability of people in the West to see how the imperialistic US and UK are viewed in the rest of the world is quite simply unbeleivable.

[StoogeWatcher]

@smithandcarlos So tell about that tolerance for women and freedom in the Muslim world. Egypt and Saudi Arabia have thrown people in jail for blogging. Somalia and Sudan have imprisoned and caned women for not covering up. Iran imprisons pro-democracy activists.

[7861iggy]

@StoogeWatcher U KNOW WHAT TODAY A WHITE 22 YEAR OLD GUY SHOT THE INNOCENT PEOPLE AND CONGRESSWOMAN IN ARIZONA. WHAT U GONNA CALL IT TERRORISM OR BAD CHILDHOOD. I THINK BAD CHILDHOOD BECOUSE HE WAS NOT A MUSLIM HE WAS A WHITE SO HE IS NOT TERRORIST,

[StoogeWatcher]

@7861iggy WELL, HE WAS A "TOLERANT" LIBERAL! LIBERALS HAVE HATED GABRIELLE GIFFORDS FOR YEARS!

[farerse]

@7861iggy he was also from a minority background , if you read carefully and not only from mainstream . nonetheless i think he was mentally unstable , that can happen to anyone

[bgg9]

@7861iggy I agree with you 100 %.

[Girl7007]

@7861iggy Fox News supports the NWO and they in secret they supported the islamic terrorists. Its all an act.

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos Sure, the US probably had little or no real reason to be there. But the reaction of the middle east people was even more despicable than the US presence itself: instead of taking the fight to the battlefield like men, just hiding amongst the crowd, with their women and children. arabs made the toll of innocent lives lost skyrocket by using their own ppl as human shields, and then on with the terrorism, INTENTIONALLY targeting civilians cuz they cant win a real fight. pathetic.

[smithandcarlos]

@xian090

Your comments indicate others are justified in targeting American military targets in response to the avaricious, rampant, devoid of respect for lives of others foreign policy implemented by the US govt.

Your comments also indicate that others are RESPONDING to the US.

The US should get the fuck out of Muslim countries and remove its military bases, tinpot dictators etc. Will never happen. The US is to blame.

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos and you say they are responding? you dont think the US was responding to something? yes it was. think of the world as a game of Monopoly. the arabs are the ones printing the money (oil). they thought they would shut down the entire united states financial system by switching to petrol/euro dollars. they thought that was real slick... look what it got them. I am sincerely sickened to think that YOUr ppl paid for that, but the US WAS responding to a threat. admit it.

[smithandcarlos]

@xian090

The world does not revolve around the US. If the US had oil and was printing money I am sure it would say it had the right to do whatever it wanted.

Iraq = oil

Afghanistan = gas pipeline

War on terror = bullshit smokescreen to fool the idiotic American public.

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos You can play the oil card as long as it will last. One day, we all know the oil will run out,and the world will rid itself of its oil addiction, and that will be the end of the lot of you. So play your game while you can. The future is: electric motors=no more middle eastern invasions=you dont count anymore+islam is incompatible with all other cultures=you will wither out and vanish. usa=too decadent, arabs=too backwards. the world needs neither. only one will remain. guess who?

[xian090]

@smithandcarlos infact, i see it like 2 ppl fighting in a bar. everyone is sick of BOTH sides. ppl want you to *take it outside* and don't come back until theres only one standing. But the truth is, you ppl know that even if you don't get wiped out or even nuked for that matter, that the oil will run out anyway, and you wont count anymore for anything. which is exactly why your ppl are running over into europe like roaches, in hopes of keeping your race alive.

[Zeno1999]

@xian090 < His mind is fucked with all the drugs he took. These people are never consistent with their argument.

His stupidity is no different than the mosquito's praise for the beauty of spider's web. He could be deported to Somalia to help his Muslim pirate brothers or he may do well in Nigeria with spam email fraud business. We don't get fooled again ( showing compassion to an idiot goon is taken as sign of weakness ).

[isawanangel2]

they want segregrated what??

[limersbey]

Malik Shabazz is incapable of listening. 

[arkivx1]

Malik Shabazz is %100 pure bitch.

[HalalKafir]

This Shabazz fool is making Muslims AND black people look stupid.

Recognize: Just because you have the right to build it, doesn't make it right to build it.

[tenyardrambo]

the difference between a western protest and a muslim protest is that the muslim protests get violent and destructive...

[shovelheadroad]

Just another way that niggers endear themselves to America.

[KCUAC]

taqiyya by the damn bucket load.......... gag me

[CorrosionX3]

8:00 I did learn more about Islam, and I am 200% convinced that the Ground Zero Mosque should not be built and Islam is incompatible with western civilization. 8:45 Thomas Jefferson learned about the Koran to know how to defeat the Barbary Pirates.

[Takaja316]

Immature!!? The Islamic religion is immature. It's like a kid who gets offended by everything and has to ask it's mum what it can where today, or if it can eat this kind of food.

[fellowservant34]

Shabazz does not speak for black people. I'm a black man and I find his comments totally outragious.

[lookin4Jesus]

Shabazz and Rauf do a very good job exposing Islam's true colors of not being compassionate or a religion of peace and both lack common sense of decency and as Pamela pointed out where is the reciprocity??? Why are we suppose to do all the giving and not complain as they place a Victory Mosque for Islam on hallowed ground where people were murdered by radical Islam on 9-11....they are looking more and more like the Islamic Radicals...excellent job Pamella Geller!

[lyntonio]

OMG is this black panther for real ....Muslims didn't do 9/11 what a fucker

[8xXcoolbeansXx8]

malik shabazz is a LIAR...he's disgusting...

[KCUAC]

@mosquewatcher hehehe

[yaaboygip]

@mosquewatcher....Mr. Shabazz is 100% correct! He slammed these idiots!

[paulnyasulu]

@mosquewatcher

I think he makes sense 

[mosquewatcher]

Great video !