Added: 1 year ago
From: askusanian
Views: 44,479
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,127)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Okay, I have a question for the people who say it's not true. Some atheists when asked what IF someday millions of people DID vanish off the face of the earth, said they still wouldn't believe God was real or had anything to do with it, instead attributing it to aliens or a bizarre allergic reaction (huh?) So if someday about half the earth's population DOES just disappear, without a trace, only their clothes left where they stood, what would you believe then?

  • Maybe I'm alone on this. I did not see this movie as a child like a lot of others. I didn't even find out about it until I was a teenager. However, if I had seen this as a child, I really don't think I would've been scared of it. I was raised in a Christian household, but as kids we had tapes of cartoons of Bible stories, and I thought they were the most boring things ever made. This I probably would've found interesting at least.

  • Nope. Still no rapture. 

  • @Cenamark2 because the time has not come yet and no one knows when it will happen. The bible says in Matthew 24:36 '"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.'

  • @sarahmwashomah That's one hypothesis. I think its more realistic to believe that the rapture hasn't happened yet because the rapture will never happen. Jesus' followers thought it was going to happen within their generation and every generation since was fooled by this ugly lie. There is no Jesus and no God.

  • Who watching this with kids would do this to their own children? So sad I used to believe this stuff ( I have a 4 year old and 8 year old ) Even if my children were murderers,I would not torture them for eternity.Much less if they didn't believe in me or that I was real. I mean how petty,vain can one be for crying out loud! This is the main fallacy in Christianity, I think.How can an ALL KNOWING being give free will?

    If he already knows what we're going to do, then it isn't free will.

  • @heathsawyer It is free will because WE determine what we are going to do, God may know what we're going to do but we don't, it comes down to the choices we make because if we just sit around waiting for God to do it for us, then nothing gets done. God made man and gave him a mind and the ability to use it.

  • god is love lol

  • Do you realize if this really happened how wonderful it'd be? Imagine no religion. Peace finally. Science abounds. Knowledge increases. Happiness and longevity and even the stars will be known to us.

  • MANN I WISH PATTY (PATTY DUNNING) LIVED THOUGH ALL THE MOVIES !!!!

  • Thumbs up if Brant Hansen sent you

  • @bookworm 1718, You're askin the same thing i am brother, those were the days, then whitey got in there turns Jesus white and the whole bible story white, and a crazy white man's fantasy video game ending make an all white movie about it, have you ever heard of an evangelist names Mambulu or Cortez, only our white leaders talkin bout the same white jesus and startin wars cause the other don't think like whitey, whitey is not white it's also a state of mind, my bookbinded brother.

  • The rapture is whitie's concept, the Judeo God who is very white steals a bunch of white Europeans away to live with and promote his rules forever, no other religon has such a grave conclusion,if you don't like this version just change your religion, i'm not racist, we all know who real whitey is,and if the rapture does happen then the earth will truly be free of whitey

  • @heimbecker11 How many white people were there out in the desert thousands of years ago?

  • I wonder if this youth group are the same group who sings ' Chirpy Chirpy, Cheap' , Well they sound like glee club.

  • I love the grimness and morbidiity of this movie, that god really is a badass, it has all the makings of a great indie film, including lazy indecisive characters who wander around like they were stunned, give it to Spielberg and we'll all be wiping our eyes later for what? shouldn't have f***d up, and you'd be eating steak in Heaven, very existential material.

  • The girl in the pigtails looks like a girl I saw in a porno once....

  • Patty Dunning where you're going?

  • That girls conversion is the best scean in all 4 movies, and I should know. I've lost track of how many times I've seen them. Was glad too hear she married the guy who played Pattys boy friend.

  • Its going to happen, very soon, and when it does these same people will come back to youtube and say i wish i would have listen to this movie.....

  • @MrApostolicdoctrine1 *listened* learn English :)

  • @AmazingNaturalWorld ?????What, who are you? I was not talking to you.

  • @MrApostolicdoctrine1 You'd think they would. Its says somewhere in the bible that when Jesus comes back to rule the earth for 1,000 yrs that some of those who behold him, Im talking about seeing Jesus Christ w/their physical eyes, will actually try to shoot Him out of the sky! During the bowl judgments (the worst of all trib judgements) those who have received the mark will shake their fists @ God and gnaw their tongues out of hate toward Him. Thats where the word "reprobate" comes to mind.

  • everyone says that their religion is the correct one, christianity is just another one that is said to be the true one, the only rapture is when we nuke the carp out of each-other, if that doesn't happen though the sun will die or the core of the earth stops and the magnetic field of the earth goes away and then everything will die because of radiation poisoning

  • @AkhmenHotep Christianity is not a religion it is having an intimate relationship with God. Between you and God. God bless you!

  • I thought as a child this film was terrible and I still think the same thing. It's all BS.

    

  • Wow that chick is hot

  • I know I am going to Heaven as I accpeted Christ, I am looking forward to be rapture and to be away from this terrible world.

  • Was that buzzing thing in the sink supposed to be an electronic razor.

  • I would love to see what has happened to these actors since this was made.

  • I'm an atheist. I hope, oh i hope there is a rapture. A world without Christians?! FUCK YEAH! finally shit would make sense...

  • I couldn't watch ghostbusters as a child because ghost are demons and only god can "bust" ghosts, plus it would scare me..... But I was FORCED to watch this and I remember it scared the crap out of me!!! O.O

  • I remember seeing this at church as a child, I was terrified, but I am, and will continue to be a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ's return.

  • Hal Lindsey helped to create this hysteria about the "end times." We should demand that he issues a public apology to all the people he has spooked since 1970.

  • @MrAdvancedAtheist demand an apology? Why do do people have to be sensitive weiners these days? People are so soft these days, it will lead to our demise in the West

  • I remember they made us sit through this tripe when I was a child and how long it took me to de-program myself. If you truly believe this or anything like it will occur, you need to look past this idiocy and your warped, abusive faith and find help before you do yourself or your family harm.

  • Get em while they're young. Ya sick fucking Christians...

  • Comment removed

  • @MardasMan - Darwinian evolution is not responsible for Catholic priests molesting innocent children or telling children that they might burn in hell forever. That is child abuse, so get your facts straight.

  • If I wipe my ass with pages from the Bible after every dump, will I be left behind in the Rapture?

  • Thumbs up, if the thinking atheist sent you here.

  • They used to show this in high schools to terrify children. They've been waiting for His return since just after he zombified and ascended to Heaven. He still hasn't come back. Yet they say it'll be any day now. It's a death cult people. All religions are. Get past it.

  • This should be banned for the protection of child abuse.

  • @MardasMan the only child abuse comes from darwinian dogmatism.

  • People wake up before its too late! Jesus will return for His faithful children, and the rest of you left on earth will have something to be scared about then. Your eternities are on the line. Repent and accept Christ this hour! It will not be long until He comes back. The replies on this video is proof of that. Sin is mounting and God will let it burn itself out but the lost will perish.

  • ATHEIST HERE!

  • Religions are the opiate of the masses.

  • @this1blackguy Son, you're a liar, and you're lying about the intentions of the Scripture. Yes, Exodus says that, but that was to the Hebrew people, that law after Christ came, he made it void for man to judge a witch. Only God can do that. FAIL AGIN. Oh the lies just pour from your useless logic. Deuteronomy speaks of occult practices and what the Hebrew people were to do, NOW TODAY because of Christ, a witch can become a Christian, so no need for that law either. FAIL AGAIN. cont...

  • @Christistruth1

    "Son, you're a liar, and you're lying about the intentions of the Scripture"

    Yours or the interpretations of others/mine? If it's the later it doesn't make sense if the earlier then I'd say it's just misinterpretation. You seem to think I'm doing it on purpose and I'm not. HEll your the one that thinks I'm a brain-dead moron, why can't a moron make mistakes?

    Also where is this coming from? It doesn't properly quote. Can you give me a part of what you quoted so I can find it.

  • @Christistruth1

    You're delusional, get help.

  • @this1blackguy Harassment, go away.

  • @Christistruth1

    You've harassed me since, say two of this thing. Your a delusional prideful hypocrite, get help.

  • Okay, whoever is reading this, notice how this1blackguy, is throwing out strawman arguments??? He's totally rediculous, and stupid, I'm SORRY, that I have to say this, but he's just stupid, his argument fails, he then starts to use X-Men to debate, and uses the example of a Gameboy, to debate, which leads me to believe WITH GOOD REASON, HE'S A CHILD, 22YR OLD, WHO DOESN'T DO WHAT HE CLAIMS TO DO.

  • @Christistruth1

    "he then starts to use X-Men to debate"

    No that would be you and the gameboy was in reference to "unnecessary" improvements.

    Regardless of my actual age, you are the only one here acting like a child. You claim me to be nothing more then a selfish, childish, idiot and yet you continue to bicker with someone you see so "below" you. If you truly believe me to be such an individual then be the bigger man and stop being so childish.

  • @this1blackguy Your logic, God should us made us with night vision, to keep our light bills down.

  • @Christistruth1

    No. God should could give us a few improvements to help us out, it just so happens to be that one of those things are lowering our bill payments. The suggestion of night vision was only was just that, a suggestion. The whole statement was based on the idea that there are some things that exist within nature that humans lack but could use to a great benefit.

  • @this1blackguy So, God is faulty, because he didn't improve us to save on lighting. RIGHTTTTTTT. ;) Nice logic there friend. Goodbye.

  • @Christistruth1

    You're strawman arguments are pathetic, I've said multiple times that the benefit of "savings" was one potential benefit in an overall argument that there are some things that humans could use (in terms of body parts) to improve ourselves, such as a need to rely less on modern convinces or protection. Frankly a more protective casing for our testicular organs other then a flab of skin would be nice.

  • @this1blackguy "The benefit of "savings" was one potential benefit in an overall argument." Let's see, God should have had the forsite to have said, "I'll give them NIGHT VISION SO THAT THEY CAN SAVE ON MONEY." Ah yes, logical....(sarcasm.) Hold on, MORE PROTECTIVE CASING FOR OUR TESTICULAR ORGANS??? ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID????? WOW, JUST...WOW.

  • @Christistruth1

    God should have the foresight to eliminate the need for things or just give us some more protection. I mean why not just something that naturally fights something like cancer, it's not man made and can occur from basically anything so people can get it and it's not "man's" fault. Also you're arguing a strawman again, you should argue against the fact I said we could use some improvements, not mocking any of the off-hand things I listed.

  • @this1blackguy Anyone ever tell you, that you need to learn when to shut up? Sorry pal, you're arguing out of sheer stupidity. God NEVER INTENDED for us to live the way we do now. SO FAIL. Cancer? Son, go read a book on the cures for cancer. This is a farce, your whole argument.

  • @Christistruth1

    If you think I'm so stupid why even argue with me? What's stopping you from not posting?

    How does giving the body the ability to be stronger against disease or giving us the option to see at night go against anything we do today? We can still do as he "intended".

    You realize there's no 100% certain cures for cancers, their are treatments and ways of managing it but their are types of cancers that can't be cured or treated. Also by natural i mean our bodies produce a "cure".

  • @this1blackguy I've already told you son why I reply, go read it again. We can see at night, we can't see in total darkness, hence the moon. Most diseases are man made, cancer wasn't a threat at that time, now we get cancer from our own doing, so "healthier"? Doesn't work. Actually, there is a cure for cancer, the man who discovered it was murdered. Go study, the cancer industry makes BILLIONS of dollars. Cure the cancer, and the industry is no more.

  • @Christistruth1

    You do it to defend yourself from non-existent lies apparently.

    Moon is not out 100% of the time (new moon) nor does it shine within every area.

    "cancer wasn't a threat at that time"

    Bull Sh*t. Being in the sun to long causes cancer, eating wheat can cause cancer, eating meat (depending on how it's cooked) can cause caner. Cancer wouldn't need to exist if god took some precautions, those organization would focus on another disease like HiV or something.

  • @this1blackguy THIS KID HAS JUST ACCUSED ME OF SOMETHING THAT WAS NEVER THE SUBJECT OF CONVERSATION.."So u use your free time to entertain yourself rather then doing something "Christ-like", like help the poor, how shameful?" HE'S DISHONEST LITTLE PUNK. We NEVER ONCE discussed, doing ministry work for Christ, when we discussed my spare time, not my MINISTRY TIME, but spare time he took a desperate shot at me. PROOF HE'S A LIAR, DISHONEST AND DESPERATE, MY MINISTRY WORK WAS NEVER THE TOPIC.

  • @Christistruth1

    Already addressed this.

  • @this1blackguy You've proven you're dishonest, go away.

  • @Christistruth1

    You're wrong, stay here.

  • @this1blackguy You've lied and been dishonest, goodbye.

  • @Christistruth1

    You're wrong, stay here.

  • @Christistruth1

    Another Flag -

    Already addressed this.

  • @this1blackguy You've proven you're dishonest, leave.

  • @Christistruth1

    Why should I? You've been an horses ass through most of this debate, even if I was lying, which I'm not, it would just be a taste of your own medicine E.G. using insults to argue. 

  • @this1blackguy Okay then stay here and be lonely. You're just a troll under this bridge son. You did lie, you took a dishonest jab at my position, and asserted it as true.

  • @Christistruth1

    If I'm a troll then the best thing is to stop feeding me, you say I'm and troll and yet you keep yapping.

  • @this1blackguy Go away, liar.

  • @Christistruth1

    You're delusional, get help.

  • @this1blackguy Okay kiddo, whatever son. All I know is you're a liar. You've proven it, now go away kiddo.

  • @Christistruth1

    You've harassed me since, day two of this thing. Your a delusional prideful hypocrite, get help.

    

  • If this movie disturbs you, you should be disturbed! I’ve studied the bible for 30 years. Things will be worse than what’s portrayed. Don’t be left out! “Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.” (John 11:25-27 KJV)

  • Movie about “imminent” pretribulation rapture made 39 years ago(!) In my studied opinion, the events will not occur in the order portrayed in this film. The bible clearly says that the Lord will return only AFTER the sun and moon have been darkened (Isa 13:9-10, Isa 24:20-23, Joel 2:1-10, Amos 8:8-9, Matt 24:29-31, Mark 13:24-26, Luke 21:25-28, Rev 6:12-11:15.) After that the redemption (“rapture”) will occur - an event we, as believers, eagerly await and unbelievers scoff (2 Pet 3:3-4 KJV.)

  • @this1blackguy No, I logically reason that God exists, and I have no doubt about it. You ASSUME God doesn't exist. "My explanation allows him to exist.." You don't allow God to exist, HE EXISTS WHETHER YOU ALLOW IT OR NOT. "but takes him out as a necessity for "morals"." Why? because he judges you and you don't want to be judged, right? Right. I don't give a rats behind of humanities standards, that's why the world is screwed up, because of thinking like that.

  • @Christistruth1

    Once again your emotions and assumptions get the better of you. You are assuming the information you have is right. You said yourself you do not have absolute knowledge of all religions and denomination and that there are people more educated on the matter then you are. You are assuming you are right.

    The term "allow god to exist" means within my explanation god existing isn't prevalent.

    Yes because forced religious law works so well in the middle east and the middle ages.

  • @this1blackguy "Once again your emotions and assumptions get the better of you." Okay Yoda, whatever. lol. You're assuming your personal opinion has merit. No, I SAID I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY RELIGIONS THEIR ARE, I NEVER SAID I HAD NO ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE.FAIL AGAIN, YOU ALWAYS MISINTERPRET WHAT I'M SAYING. I'm sure there are people that are more educated than I am, but you're guessing that too. You're assuming your opinion has merit.

  • @Christistruth1

    Mr. Miyagi would have been more accurate.

    "I NEVER SAID I HAD NO ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE."

    That's a double negative. I assume it's just a grammatical mistake, but please fix it so I can respond to it properly.

    Yeah I'm in no way assuming there are people who are more educated then you are. You've been blabbing about your 17 years of studies for a while. There are people who've spent much more time and have studied much more religions then you have, if I assume what you said was true.

  • @this1blackguy Mr. Miyagi, yeah, okay, whatever lololol. I never said I had no absolute knowledge or had absolute knowledge. But what I do have, is more of an understanding and knowledge of God is as a person, through UNDERSTANDING scripture, in which you FAIL MISERABLY AT. I also notice that you argue pointlessly, you use it to attack. Is't pathetic. I MENTIONED, MY EDUCATION IN SCRIPTURE ONCE, ONCE, ONE TIME, GET IT? ONCE. I wasn't talking about other people, I was talking about you and me.

  • @Christistruth1

    1. Well Yoda is more known for the way he talks where as Mr. Miyagi is known for what he says.

    2. That's a contradictory statement. Either you have absolute knowledge on the current subject at hand or you don't.

    3. That's only you're current interpretation of truth. Applying that here makes you no different then the flat earth people.

    4. You've actually literally said it twice and mentioned general statements a lot

    5.When I originally brought it up I meant other people.

  • @this1blackguy 1. Pointless. 2. No, it's not a contradictory statement, I have an UNDERSTANDING, not an absolute knowledge. 3. Nope, I don't interpret truth. 4. I've said what twice? 5. Sure you did.

  • @Christistruth1

    1. If you're going to insult someone you should be accurate, not lazy.

    2. If the understanding that's not absolute it's subject to error.

    3. Yes you do. You use your interpretations to determine what's true.

    4. Ctrl + F "17".

    5. Are you insinuating I was saying "I've studied religion more then you"? How did you get that out of what I said?

  • @this1blackguy 1. Oh brother. That's all that needs to be said about that. 2. Okay that made no sense at all. It's like arguing with lassie. 3. No, I do not use interpretations to determine truth. Truth, BY UNDERSTANDING. 4. ??? 5. I never said you did. Anyways, this isn't intellectually stimulating one bit.

  • @Christistruth1

    1. Pardon me for trying to improve your insulting skills.

    2. How's saying not having knowledge of everything means you're subject to possible error "not make sense".

    3. What you claim to be an accurate understanding based on your interpretation.

    4. You'll find two instances of it using that command.

    5. So why did you answer "Sure you did"? Then why are you talking to me? If you don't care that much then stop posting... you won't because of pride though.

  • @this1blackguy 1. I'm sorry you're insulted, but sometimes the truth hurts son.

    2. An finite mind can not have complete knowledge of an infinite mind, BUT THE SCRIPTURES, through understanding, gives us this understanding and limited knowledge of God. Revelation does as well, and discernment.3. No, based on Biblical understanding, the Bible proves I am accurate. 4. Quote it. 5. No, because you're lying and I am clarifying the accusations.

  • @Christistruth1

    1. I never said I was insulted, but thanks for saying I'm truthfully Yoda.

    2. If it's not absolute it's irrelevant. I see what you're saying, something like, boy X has bad handwriting, therefore he more then not can't draw, is a logical statement and me saying "well he might be able to use a tablet" would seem illogical, but it's still possible until demonstrated otherwise.

    3. Right just as it did for the flat earth people.

    TBC

  • @Christistruth1

    4. "17yrs of Biblical study gives me" & "I could be wrong, but it's not likely from all the research I have done, 17yrs of." You honestly could have done this with a quick "Find" command and saved us both the trouble.

    5. And you care about my supposed lying because? If you think I'm as dumb as you claim, then people should be able to discern the "truth" from my supposed "lies" with a little reading.

  • @this1blackguy The rest of this comment about forced religious laws, is asinine. Son, why don't you just pack up and leave, you've embarrassed yourself enough already.

  • @Christistruth1

    Did you not say humans making up their own rules screws up the world? Did you not argue nothing more then the absolute rules of god unmodified are the only way to not have the world in such dismay, because any human change would cause chaos.

    You think forced religious law will fix everything. All I was doing was giving a couple of examples of why that's failed.

  • @this1blackguy 1. Humans without God can bring chaos, as we have seen, humans do without God. Religions, I care nothing for. Christ came to bring salvation, not a religious experience. The only way this world can survive, is through Jesus Christ, UNMODIFIED, because God can not be changed by man. Nope, I don't think forced religious law will fix everything, I NEVER SAID THAT. Salvation through CHRIST CAN ONLY FIX EVERYTHING. Son, I'm tired of your failed arguments, give up.

  • @Christistruth1 "I'M not an artist---I'm a SCULPTOR!" "I'M not a brick-layer---I'm in the construction industry."

    Yes, Masa Saxon, everybody else has a RELIGION, but YOU are a CHRISTIAN!

    Terror, misery and a desperate need to share your sickness; typical.

    "To worship Christ is to fornicate with a dead Cockroach."---Kalimite proverb

  • @ChurchOfKali66619 1. Yes, I am a Christian, I am a follower of Christ. Hence "Christ-ian". But what you don't understand is Christ did not come to bring a religion, but to have a relationship with mankind. Here's what I find interesting, the BIble states to keep away from religions made of men, why would they say that if that is what they were doing? They would be contradicting their own position. The fact of the matter is they weren't, because of what they stated was not a religion.

  • @ChurchOfKali66619 I don not spread terror, nor misery, neither am I a sick person, when you accuse me of such things, only proves that you are desperate to validate your moralism. Ah, yes a quote from the demonic Kalimite church. Son, spiritually, you've lost, and this spiritual war, get the behind me, or need I remind you of your fate? Deny all you want, but you have an appointment with damnation.

  • @ChurchOfKali66619 I care not for your Kalimite proverb, that has no power over the WORD OF GOD. anyone who employs divination, a practicer of magic or anyone who looks for omens or a sorcerer, or one who binds others with a spell or anyone who consults a spirit medium or a professional foreteller of events or anyone who inquires of the dead. For everybody doing these things is something detestable to God.”—Deuteronomy 18:10-12. King of kings and LORD of lords. You will proclaim this name.

  • @Christistruth1

    And the only way to find salvation through Christ is to embrace your religion. You think that if everyone was your religion the world would be at peace. Thus, forced religious law.

    If you're so tired of it why don't you just stop responding. Beyond your own pride there's no reason for you to keep talking.

  • @this1blackguy Nope, THE ONLY WAY TO FIND SALVATION, IS TO FINE CHRIST, BECAUSE CHRIST IS SALVATION, NOT RELIGION, FAIL!!!!!!!. AGAIN, LOL. Nope, I NEVER SAID THAT IF EVERYONE WERE MY RELIGION THE WORLD WOULD BE AT PEACE. IF EVERYONE LISTENED TO THE TEACHINGS OF CHRIST, THE WORLD WOULD BE. I NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT RELIGION. YOU'RE LYING AGAIN. YOU'RE PATHETIC. I respond, BECAUSE YOU ARE A LIAR.

  • @Christistruth1

    How can someone find Christ without being an affiliate of a religion?

    "I respond, BECAUSE YOU ARE A LIAR. "

    That makes no sense. Also to lie is to falsify a known or believed truth. If you asked a person who's born blind, what's the color of the sky (and he's never been told before), and he answers "green", they're not exactly lying. You should have used the word "wrong" in stead of "liar", it wouldn't have been true but it would fit better with your current argument. 

  • @this1blackguy The same way one has a relationship with another, parent, friend. It does make sense, because you lie about me, and things I say, I need to clear up the lie, not for you, but for all who read understand. Yes, and you have lied about my position many times, and have made false accusations=LIAR. He wouldn't answer green, because he wouldn't know what green was, he wouldn't UNDERSTAND WHAT COLOR WAS OR LOOKED LIKE. HE'S BLIND,LOGICALLY HE WOULD SAY "I DON'T KNOW." BONEHEAD, LOL

  • @Christistruth1

    That's still a religion. Any affiliation with a super natural something you use as an explanation for the world is a religion.

    Yeah it's only a lie if I know the "real" answer and intently falsify it. Being incorrect or misinterpreting something isn't a lie.

    Really "bonehead". This is why I helped you before with your insults, they're getting stale, put some effort into it at least.

  • @this1blackguy No, it's not, because a relationship, is not a religion. No, it is not a religion, God speaks of religion being man made. Yes, and YOU HAVE ACCUSED ME OF THINGS I NEVER SAID AND HAVE ACCUSED ME OF TAKING POSITIONS I NEVER CLAIMED. Should I call you something else instead of "bonehead"??? Moron, idiot, pick one.

  • @Christistruth1

    Then it's still a religion because you fall under something man made. You may not affiliate yourself as such but it's still a religion.

    A false accusation based on what is believed to be true is not a lie. For me to lie in that situation I would have had to know your position and falsify it.

    Try something in Latin. You already said you see me as a joke, have some fun with it. Aren't you an animator and comic artist? Show some imagination.

  • @this1blackguy You, "Can't God make illogical thinking right?" All this pages and pages of rambling that you offer up, really isn't an argument. 1. No, it's not a religion. You're presuming God is man made. No, you know my position, and then asserted a lie on my position,by something I never claimed. 2. So, because I'm not insulting you, in a more "artistic" and "Imaginative" manner, I'm not an animator or comic artist? Right? Is this correct? So, I should use my talent to insult you better?

  • @Christistruth1

    1. No I'm saying how man considered what is wrong and right in the bible (or rather what's true) put people in those religion. I never said anything about god in terms of religion, just how people define their relationship.

    1.5. Frankly you've been unclear in your positions, so I don't know what it is.

    2, No I'm just saying you must not be a very good one due to a lack of imagination.

  • @this1blackguy Your argument...." Were poorly designed. We could use some improvement.' i.e. "night vision", WHY? "To save money on lighting." That's your argument son. lol

    I'm supposed to take anything else you say seriously???

  • @Christistruth1

    Find me the quote where I say we're poorly design. Poorly design =/= could use some improvements.

    Honestly, you're the one who's lying now (at least by your interpretation of what it means to lie).

  • @this1blackguy Did you or did you not say that were poorly designed??? IF YOU DIDN'T THEN WHY COMPARE THE EYE OF AN OWL TO HUMAN??? HMMMM? Nope, I have not lied.

  • @Christistruth1

    No I never did. Should you think otherwise, provide the quote that uses those exact words. Why did I say we could use the eye's of an owl, because they're better eyes then those human currently have and we'd be better off with them.

  • @this1blackguy Owls have night vision, you stated that we should have night vision, and compared our eyes to that of an owl. They're not better eyes, THEY'RE DIFFERENT EYES.

  • @this1blackguy You should have not used a DUMB analogy. You're a waste of blood son, seriously. Give up, do yourself a favor and other atheists.

  • @Christistruth1

    The analogy is fine. You're just forcing a bad answer for something that, in all honesty, was just an example that answering something incorrectly is not lying unless done purposely.

    You are a really bad Christian, or maybe unbeknownst to me, this is how you're suppose to act.

  • @this1blackguy No, the analogy is not fine. No, you've proven that you're a liar, by accusing me of things I never said. Answering something incorrectly does not mean you''re a liar, it means you don't know, UNLESS you answer it with the intention of your answer to be correct, KNOWING it's not. Son, I don't care how you see me as a Christian, get that through your hollow head. I don't care, what you think of me, okay?

  • @Christistruth1

    It's not a purposeful forced accusation of something I know not to be true so it's not a lie.

    "UNLESS you answer it with the intention of your answer to be correct, KNOWING it's not."

    Then I'm not a liar. This is the same statement I've been reiterating several times about why my "accusations" aren't lies.

    If you didn't care you wouldn't respond.

  • @this1blackguy "Were poorly designed, because we don't have night vision," BECAUSE" SOME HUMANS are active at night, and we would save a lot of money on lighting."

  • @Christistruth1

    I never said that, I said we could use some improvement. Poor design doesn't = could use some improvement.

  • @this1blackguy "Were poorly designed." YOU, " We could use some improvement." why? "Because we could save money on lighting." Your argument.

  • @this1blackguy "Were poorly designed, because we don't have night vision," BECAUSE" SOME HUMANS are active at night, and we would save a lot of money on lighting." ,

    You've said it all son. You've proven, that were poorly designed, because now we can't save money on lighting. (sarcasm)

    LOLOLOL.

  • @Christistruth1

    I never said that, I said we could use some improvement. Poor design doesn't = could use some improvement.

    Now who's the liar.

  • @this1blackguy Your argument.." Were poorly designed. We could use some improvement.' i.e. "night vision", WHY? "To save money on lighting." That's your argument son. lol

  • @Christistruth1

    Find me the quote where I say we're poorly design. Poorly design =/= could use some improvements.

    Honestly, you're the one who's lying now (at least by your interpretation of what it means to lie).

    Also the "save money on lighting" was one benefit. Honestly how is being able to see in the dark without secondary tools, not something that would be good for humanity.

  • @this1blackguy "I said we could use some improvement. " IF A DESIGN REQUIRES SOME IMPROVEMENTS, THEN THE DESIGN IS NOT UP TO PAR, IN FACT, IT WOULD BE POOR IN COMPARISON. WHY IMPROVE SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ADEQUATE???? YOU SELF CONTRADICT. LOLOL, SO GOD SHOULD HAVE SAID.."YOU KNOW, TO SAVE THEM MONEY ON LIGHTING, I'LL DESIGN THEM WITH NIGHT VISION." RIGHT?????? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

  • @Christistruth1

    No. The only thing it implies is that it isn't perfect, and before you counter with "we're not suppose to be perfect", that's fine but I'm not arguing for moral or "spiritual" perfection, just listing some physical improvements.

    Well if god knew about the lightning and could give us a way to avoid having to pay for it, why not? I thought he was benevolent, you're saying he wouldn't do us a solid by saving us a couple of bucks?

  • @this1blackguy There you go, you just admitted imperfect eyes. I NEVER SAID we weren't supposed to be perfect. You're arguing from subjective perception, that carries no weight. Okay, God didn't create thinking.."Okay, I should upgrade their eyes, to save on light bills." (rolls eyes). LOLOLOL, IS THIS KID SERIOUS??????

  • @Christistruth1

    I really hate calling "straw man" during things like these but you keep bringing the same one up (that and the possible grammatical error in your second sentence, because of the  double negative you seem to be saying: "we're suppose to be perfect" ). The overall argument was that humans could use some improvements that's it. How is it subjective, I'm saying our lives would be better with it and listed a few facts to back up that premise.

  • @this1blackguy "Humans could use some improvements that's it." That's not even an objective opinion, it's a subjective one, and it accounts for NOTHING, but your own view. It's subjective, BECAUSE NOT EVERYONE AGREES WITH IT. IT'S STUPID. "I'm saying our lives would be better with it and listed a few facts to back up that premise." No, you GAVE AN OPINION, THEN GAVE SOME REASONS TO VALIDATE YOUR OPINIONS.

  • @Christistruth1

    Actually if you include observations of certain advantages given to other creatures in the natural world, it's not really an "opinion" that certain traits are desired. I've yet to hear anyone, even you, say there's nothing they wouldn't like to have, if some people are satisfied, so be it, but I'm talking about an overall improvement to humanity, not individualistic opinion, and in an overall sense there are a lot of things we could use that would solve a lot of problems.

  • @this1blackguy Oh and by the way.."God could make illogical thinking right." Your logic.."God can make yellow not yellow." LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

  • @Christistruth1

    If god wants to change the current way we see the Color Spectrum in terms of wavelength or frequency, changing how our retinas receive the information, or just switching some names, why can't he?

  • @this1blackguy BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T HAVE THE EYES WE WOULD NEED. SWITCHING NAMES????? WTH????

  • @Christistruth1

    Well there's technically no need to discern color other then identification. And frankly their are animals with better eyes then that of humans. I'm not sure if you think cavemen are "real" but the eyes we have now kind of suck compared to some animals. Something like Owl eyes or sonar would have been much more useful. Actually why not night vision? In terms of survivability night vision is pretty damn useful.

  • @this1blackguy So? I don't care if there are animals with better eyes, I'm perfectly happy with the ones I have, all eyes are related to each animal ACCORDING TO THE NEED. Do us all a favor, and pluck out your eyes, and replace them with that specific animal that has a better eye than yours, and see what happens. GO AHEAD, DO IT. THIS IS JUST STUPID, STUPID "OH MY EYE SUCKS" ATHEISTS ARE IDIOTS. Why would we need sonar? WE DON'T HUNT AT NIGHT!!!!!!!!!, MORON. WE SLEEP AT NIGHT, NO NIGHT VISION.

  • @Christistruth1

    If I had the technology I'd do it.

    "WE DON'T HUNT AT NIGHT"

    You do know I was referring to "caveman times" and not modern times. And some humans are pretty active at night, not to mention we'd save a lot of money on lighting.

  • @this1blackguy No, I don't know you were referring to caveman times, how in the hell am I supposed to read you mind? Okay, so let's get this straight, because we don't have night vision, were designed badly, because SOME humans are active at night, AND WE WOULD SAVE A LOT OF MONEY ON LIGHTING???? ARE YOU SERIOUS?????? YOU ARE A 22 YR OLD MORON.

  • @Christistruth1

    "am I supposed to read you mind"

    It was in the statement. Though I do admit its a bit in-discerning.

    No. I'm saying we'd be better off for it. Humans aren't perfect in no sense of the word, our exposure to disease and inability to regenerate beyond epidermal damage are somethings god could improve upon.

  • @this1blackguy Okay, wait a second, so because we can't regenerate, WERE POORLY DESIGNED??? IS THIS RIGHT??? LOL. Son, you've been watching X-Men a lot. Okay, these are comic books, their not real. Mutants, don't exist. Now, I know you would LOVE to be like Wolverine, but get over it son. This is rubbish.

  • @Christistruth1 They're *

  • @Christistruth1

    Why do you think something being improved mean it was poorly design. I think at one point you said one of your kids "fools around" with programming. There are tons of way programs can be improved by shortening the amount of syntax, giving more options to the user, and being more user friendly. Something like the Gameboy is not by any means poorly designed because the 3DS, which is considered an improvement on the original technology, was made.

    TBC

  • @this1blackguy Why improve something that needs no improvement??? Ever hear of the saying that goes.."If it's not broke don't fix it." ?? Yes, but that's because of mans finite understanding, and because new things have been invented to improve, what we could NOT imagine BEFORE HAND. THE EYE IS NOT THE SAME!!!!!! WE HAVE NO NEED FOR NIGHT VISION, ARE YOU SERIOUS???? OH LORD, HE'S COMPARING THE HUMAN EYE, TO A GAMEBOY???????? YOU'RE A CHILD, I'M TALKING TO A CHILD.

  • @Christistruth1

    So god didn't improve our bodies so those things never needed to be invented because? I mean a lot of pollution, wars, and stress could be avoided if we shared somethings with our animal companions. You'd think the all benevolent being would help us out. Also try reading before mocking, I'm saying something being improved does not mean it is inadequate or poorly designed, it's a simplistic scenario, you're bias once again blinds you.

  • @this1blackguy This debate is over, be reason of your stupidity. "Well if god knew about the lightning and could give us a way to avoid having to pay for it, why not? I thought he was benevolent, you're saying he wouldn't do us a solid by saving us a couple of bucks?"

  • @Christistruth1

    Oh well then good bye. I'll just post some last words then, even though you won't see them.

    Also you didn't refute anything of what I said, you've said several times that he provides for us and gave us the tools to survive in our environment, their are plenty of things we had that weren't "needed", why not toss in a couple more extras?

  • @this1blackguy Your logic, God is faulty, because he didn't do us a "solid" to help us save on our light bills. (shakes head.) lol...wow, all I can say is just....wow. Go to a doctor, and have everything that you say is not needed removed, GO DO IT, PROVE YOUR POINT, PROVE THAT THEY ARE USELESS. GO. I CHALLENGE YOU, GO GET EVERYTHING THAT YOU SAY, IS USELESS REMOVED, I WONDER IF YOU GOT THE B@LLS to do it???

  • @Christistruth1

    Once again using a strawman argument, address what the message was obviously conveying, that we could use some improvements that would benefit us. I've already gotten a few of those things removed and if I had the money I'd gladly go to a doctor and get them taken out, hell I'll give you my address and you can write a personal check to a surgeon of your choice and I'll gladly use it to get them removed.

  • @this1blackguy I'm not paying for a darn thing, YOU DO IT, DON'T PUT THE BURDEN ON ME BECAUSE YOUR SORRY BUTT IS POOR.

  • @Christistruth1

    Well I've taken out my wisdom teeth, my appendix, I have no 3rd eyelid, and am relatively hairless.

    Is 3 1/2 enough or does it have to be all of them (cause there's like 20)?

    Also you claim I'm poor because I don't have A few hundred grand to piss away on unnecessary surgery? That's an unbelievable fault filled claim.

  • @this1blackguy Good, I'm proud of you for taking out your wisdom teeth, I'm happy you got your appendix out, I'll look in my bag of "I don't give a rats behind" and see if I have a medal for you. That was a joke, I don't know if you're poor or not, I don't care. So, don't base your arguments on useless arguments. Strawman.

  • @Christistruth1

    Basing an argument off of something that's not meant to be taken seriously is not a strawman argument, though it is a part of it. To be a strawman argument I would have to try and discredit an actual point by attacking a "useless argument". Since I'm only arguing against your "fake" point it's not a strawman.