how about taking them out? but how? blowing up something is not the best answer...so we need to research technology wich "re-naturizes" this artificial clouds. some ELF-move-away-wave-emitter or something...
super video es ist zeit zum wach werden im land der Pharaone isiss schon aufgefallen in letzter zeit ist sonntag immer schön heute sonntag strahlend blauer himmel kein einziger chemtrails last euch nicht mehr anlügen schaut selber in den himmel
@erniemac2: ok there are con-trails and chem-trails. i that case you are right, chem-trails do not exist, also in my oppinion. but what the contrails emitt - the metal particles - thats what I was talking about. stuff wich slowly comes down to earth and wich could make one sick by breathing eventually...saw your video with the contrail specs.
what I want are comments related to the topic and not related to myself please. ehm. the topic would be haarp, not chemtrails. ok, my fault, sorry..
You only deceive yourself. It is of no use in claiming you "saw" a Chemtrail plane. You need to video it and upload it into YouTube.
Your reasoning about HAARP stations having such wide coverable is not at all scientific. Just don't believe what you read in other dud Chemtrail videos. None if this is not at all factual.
You are right. I should upload some chemtrail plane vids. But I wont. Because, this video was made in my "Movie Cut Day" schedule and commenting it or making other vids about that was not my target. Nor was my target to fuckin discuss that stuff. I just want to make a vid each week...eventually you will get a chemtrail vid, but I prefer birds, ducks and swans on my cam-drive.
It is of little use in blaming some way out non existent "cause". Chemtrails don't exist and HAARP stations only exist in two locations. One in Russia, the other in Alaska.
Sorry to disappoint you but you live in a very wet part of the world. Come to Australia where the sun shines too much. Also, contrails are not a common occurrence.
I am not a weather specialist. I just know, there are chemtrails, there is HAARP and here the sky is mostly white/grey covered...I knew a time where it was blue every day, now its blue ONE day a MONTH.....I just want my blue skies back ;)
at 2.53 you will see the mountain on the right, and the clouds are just above it. so, it is max 1.4km heigh.
I was standing there, dude. ;)
The clouds were under "little plane height". Near to the city is a civil small airplane airport. If i cannot see such a cessna-like plane but hear it, the clouds must be really near (just to proove ;) ) - the clouds were about 200m above me.
I just viewed some cirrus-photographs, ok - they are somewhat similar. but normal clouds do not have such "organized" geometry. And normal clouds do not cover just anything where there was nothing just a few minutes before.
The clouds were not moving in with the wind, they were "built up" at position. For me, it was obvious, that this was an ELF-wave layer, wich someone had decided to lay over mid-europe. (think global.."they" do..)
Hmm I do not know what the antenna is for (not mobilephone)..
The power lines (where?) are just there. But the antenna is on a military shelter (where I stand on when filming it) and it is not a mobilephone antenna.
fact is: I don't know, what exactly that clouds were. But they were NOT natural, nooo way. And my understanding tells me, this was an ELF layer to build up some..pressure(?)..
fact 2 is: "they" do something with the skies, besides if my oppinion is true or false, and what "they" do is not for the good of us all...
besides all that: that was nothing "upper stratosphere" that was just about 1.5km above sea level. where I stand is about 450m, and the "mountains" in the back are just 1.2km height. the highest clouds here are about 1.7km over sea level.
The wind at ground level has little to do with high altitude winds at the top of the stratosphere. In addition, you cannot judge wind speed for clouds at these altitudes. This is likewise for planes. Look at my video for information on Contrails and cirrus clouds. See
Contrail Formation, Perseverance and Spread, SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY
watch?v=tGNXrgL7-qo
WIn Sydney, we have jet streams which go from west to east. We very often have a cover of high altitude cirrus clouds which can cover all sky.
These clouds are NORMAL cirrus clouds, Nothing more, nothing less ! The "border" you see are clouds at different levels in the upper stratosphere. Normal cirrus clouds are thin and they represent the last natural clouds at these heights. Where is the HAARP station you propose causing this ? I see you scan power lines. Are these emitting your HAARP waves ?
in solothurn, auf dem hügel zwischen biberist und zuchwil
ben0bi 10 months ago
how about taking them out? but how? blowing up something is not the best answer...so we need to research technology wich "re-naturizes" this artificial clouds. some ELF-move-away-wave-emitter or something...
ben0bi 1 year ago
ok.they do it.
and now?we got enough videos and pic's,but whats next?
spyguybuy 1 year ago
super video es ist zeit zum wach werden im land der Pharaone isiss schon aufgefallen in letzter zeit ist sonntag immer schön heute sonntag strahlend blauer himmel kein einziger chemtrails last euch nicht mehr anlügen schaut selber in den himmel
wenebeinhart 1 year ago
@erniemac2: ok there are con-trails and chem-trails. i that case you are right, chem-trails do not exist, also in my oppinion. but what the contrails emitt - the metal particles - thats what I was talking about. stuff wich slowly comes down to earth and wich could make one sick by breathing eventually...saw your video with the contrail specs.
what I want are comments related to the topic and not related to myself please. ehm. the topic would be haarp, not chemtrails. ok, my fault, sorry..
ben0bi 1 year ago
You only deceive yourself. It is of no use in claiming you "saw" a Chemtrail plane. You need to video it and upload it into YouTube.
Your reasoning about HAARP stations having such wide coverable is not at all scientific. Just don't believe what you read in other dud Chemtrail videos. None if this is not at all factual.
ERNIEMAC2 2 years ago
You are right. I should upload some chemtrail plane vids. But I wont. Because, this video was made in my "Movie Cut Day" schedule and commenting it or making other vids about that was not my target. Nor was my target to fuckin discuss that stuff. I just want to make a vid each week...eventually you will get a chemtrail vid, but I prefer birds, ducks and swans on my cam-drive.
ben0bi 2 years ago
Sorry, the weather is one of nature's wonders.
It is of little use in blaming some way out non existent "cause". Chemtrails don't exist and HAARP stations only exist in two locations. One in Russia, the other in Alaska.
Sorry to disappoint you but you live in a very wet part of the world. Come to Australia where the sun shines too much. Also, contrails are not a common occurrence.
ERNIEMAC2 2 years ago
You have your oppinion, I have mine. If you have to much sun, go inside. But I cannot go outside, if there is to less sun...
For me, HAARP is a weapon wich can accumulate storms and whatever, such a little covering should not be a problem.
And chemtrails exist. To much proof to deny it, sorry. I see this fuckin chemtrail planes every day, no one can tell me that stuff doesnt exist.
For me this commenting discussion is done, I just wanted to upload some video not to write tons of text to it.
ben0bi 2 years ago
Yes, weather is one of natures wonders. That does not say, that there cannot be any "unnatural" weather.
Chemtrails exist, I just saw another two chemtrail planes, so...deny your own observations, but not mine please. I know what my eyes see.
HAARP stations exist only in two locations...so what? Weapons factories also exist there, where NO war is....
ben0bi 2 years ago
@ben0bi hey ben0bi, wo hesch das ufgnoh, solothurn oder bern?
nikkthequick84 10 months ago
@ERNIEMAC2 haaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha no plan u have... sorry
DrBrainsurferCH 1 year ago
Are your clouds Stratocumulus Undulatus ? These are low level clouds. See
watch?v=pK_OjmbxMzY&feature=fvsr
Stratocumulus Undulatus (10.10.2009) Poland..Warsaw
erniepond1 2 years ago
I am not a weather specialist. I just know, there are chemtrails, there is HAARP and here the sky is mostly white/grey covered...I knew a time where it was blue every day, now its blue ONE day a MONTH.....I just want my blue skies back ;)
ben0bi 2 years ago
How do you gauge how high the cloud layer is ?
ERNIEMAC2 2 years ago
at 2.53 you will see the mountain on the right, and the clouds are just above it. so, it is max 1.4km heigh.
I was standing there, dude. ;)
The clouds were under "little plane height". Near to the city is a civil small airplane airport. If i cannot see such a cessna-like plane but hear it, the clouds must be really near (just to proove ;) ) - the clouds were about 200m above me.
ben0bi 2 years ago
I just viewed some cirrus-photographs, ok - they are somewhat similar. but normal clouds do not have such "organized" geometry. And normal clouds do not cover just anything where there was nothing just a few minutes before.
The clouds were not moving in with the wind, they were "built up" at position. For me, it was obvious, that this was an ELF-wave layer, wich someone had decided to lay over mid-europe. (think global.."they" do..)
Hmm I do not know what the antenna is for (not mobilephone)..
ben0bi 2 years ago
not much chars here. ;)
The power lines (where?) are just there. But the antenna is on a military shelter (where I stand on when filming it) and it is not a mobilephone antenna.
fact is: I don't know, what exactly that clouds were. But they were NOT natural, nooo way. And my understanding tells me, this was an ELF layer to build up some..pressure(?)..
fact 2 is: "they" do something with the skies, besides if my oppinion is true or false, and what "they" do is not for the good of us all...
ben0bi 2 years ago
besides all that: that was nothing "upper stratosphere" that was just about 1.5km above sea level. where I stand is about 450m, and the "mountains" in the back are just 1.2km height. the highest clouds here are about 1.7km over sea level.
ben0bi 2 years ago
The wind at ground level has little to do with high altitude winds at the top of the stratosphere. In addition, you cannot judge wind speed for clouds at these altitudes. This is likewise for planes. Look at my video for information on Contrails and cirrus clouds. See
Contrail Formation, Perseverance and Spread, SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY
watch?v=tGNXrgL7-qo
WIn Sydney, we have jet streams which go from west to east. We very often have a cover of high altitude cirrus clouds which can cover all sky.
ERNIEMAC2 2 years ago
These clouds are NORMAL cirrus clouds, Nothing more, nothing less ! The "border" you see are clouds at different levels in the upper stratosphere. Normal cirrus clouds are thin and they represent the last natural clouds at these heights. Where is the HAARP station you propose causing this ? I see you scan power lines. Are these emitting your HAARP waves ?
We have one in Sydney, Australia.
See
HAARP Lines, Sutherland Shire, Sydney, Australia.mov
watch?v=7rINEJcw0pA
ERNIEMAC2 2 years ago