if there's no discrimination on sexual orientation, that there's no case of reverse discrimination. Honestly, I dun think voicing out "against homosexual" is a rights. It's actually an abuse of human rights as to take away the rights of homosexual being respected by the others. As Mrs. Leung in this program said, there's rights and responsibilities, so i guess the Society of True & Light should gain the public respect (rights) by giving a responsibility of respecting those homosexual groups.
Responsibilities come from trainings. Not all trainings covering everything. Universal human rights don't have universal trainings and/or responsibilities. Is religion a right or a trained responsibility?
Whatever what she said, all I heard from her is "Strength through PURITY".
"People can not speak out against the DANGER of the homo lifestyle..."yeah the law is removing christian's freedom of bashing homosexual, and that makes them raged lol.
The gender discimination bill has been passed and women have not abused the system. SODB is actually the same. Everyone is equal!
The lady keeps mentioning criticising gay's lifestyle. Come on! Straight people are moral? Some have affairs. Some look for prostitues. Is watching pronographic magazines immoral? Pass a law to ban it?
For a while I thought civil rights is non-existent in HK. May I say I'm so thankful that a mainstream media like Pearl took the initiative and investigate such bigot and twisted organisations. And to so many of those who'd stand up to fight for the vulnearble minorites in HK. Its about time!
What a fascist this Mary Leung is. She is concern about her "right" to speak out against homosexual and "the danger of homosexual lifestyle" once the law of G&L protection passed!!!
What kind of "danger" is she implying? Is she suggesting heterosexual lifestyle is all "safe" then? She even condemned the law that protects maternity leave!!!! Thats coming from a woman!!! I m speechless.
The woman actually tries to argue that human right includes the "right" to slander and discriminate against others, I am speechless. It is a travesty that such a hate group is actually teaching human right. Imagine the KKK lecturing on civil right.
Ok, I'm done with them, those f*cktards from The Truth Of Truth Light Society constantly try to enforce the view that homosexuality is harmful to people! Christians are bigot.
everyone please remember what the woman say, it is dangerous not to fire a pregnant employee! i hope she'd never get pregnant and so can always save her own job.
note that the lady here does not clarify what the "dangers of a homosexual lifestyle" are...
but btw, well done to pearl channel. very neutral and un-biased media, and leaves the audience to decide for themselves whether to believe the fascist.
from the 7th minute onwards it becomes kind of like the chaotic scenes in the fucked up american talk shows =)
think about it in terms of da pregnant woman eg: should a law protect the woman in case she's fired unfairly due to her pregnancy, or should the employer be protected for his rights to fire an employee? the employer's right to fire an employee is already protected by legally recognized employment contracts. Now applying the same situation to a homosexual. Why is the Society worry about the right for an employer to fire someone? Could there be some other underlying motive?
Can you imagine if the British, pre-1997, refused to pass a law protecting Chinese Hong Kongers, because they say if the law is passed "British white people will have no right to speak out against the dangers of the Chinese people"?? .
The law protects minorities from being attacked or discriminated against and that is its only power. Don't get caught up in the confusion they are trying to stir up.
Everything boils down to this one line from the lady: "With this law people might not be able to speak out against the DANGER of homosexuality". They are protecting their rights of attacking another group, which is the exact problem the law is trying to prevent. What a bunch of close-minded hypocrites.
++The United Nations International Bill of Human Rights states: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."
as for human responsibilities, search by yourself pls.
----------------
do you have any statistical data about "kids NOWADAYS are very selfish"?
and do you have done any research of how kids define "freedom"?
I am not saying human beings shouldn't have dignity and rights, but often time they are over emphasized that it becomes their rights violates others' rights.
People merely mention responsibilities and care for one another, even fewer actually do it.
there is a survey ask student for the bad lanuguage habit, you didn't heard that? Also there were surveys asking students' alltitude about sexual intercourse.
tell this to those kids that cursing with bad language around and smoking when they are younger than 10, and there is nothing the teachers and parents can do about it, because "kids have their rights", so you cannot discipline them.
You still dont get it. The discipline issue of kids nowadays, is an entirely different topics. You cant use that as a reason to exclude the basic human rights from a particular group of population. These two are not mutually exclusive and should be tackled independently. You see the fallacy of your argument now?
For your own sake, I wish your dignity and rights will ever be at the mercy of someone with the mind set like yours.
Homosexuality is NOT a lifestye! How can she be so ignorant? Nobody choose to be gay or lesbian. I'm so sick of seeing this society of untrue acts as agent of God Almighty and spreading hatred between gay and straight people.
if there's no discrimination on sexual orientation, that there's no case of reverse discrimination. Honestly, I dun think voicing out "against homosexual" is a rights. It's actually an abuse of human rights as to take away the rights of homosexual being respected by the others. As Mrs. Leung in this program said, there's rights and responsibilities, so i guess the Society of True & Light should gain the public respect (rights) by giving a responsibility of respecting those homosexual groups.
zhater 7 months ago
Responsibilities come from trainings. Not all trainings covering everything. Universal human rights don't have universal trainings and/or responsibilities. Is religion a right or a trained responsibility?
beancube2010 9 months ago
A law that protects gay couples will prevent christians from gay bashing? LOL
Teenager couldn't think for themselves? LOLOLOLOL!
bananian 2 years ago 3
danger of homosexsual life???? speak out the danger of homosexual life?
lhkpeggy 2 years ago 11
Whatever what she said, all I heard from her is "Strength through PURITY".
"People can not speak out against the DANGER of the homo lifestyle..."yeah the law is removing christian's freedom of bashing homosexual, and that makes them raged lol.
forgotten09 2 years ago 2
The gender discimination bill has been passed and women have not abused the system. SODB is actually the same. Everyone is equal!
The lady keeps mentioning criticising gay's lifestyle. Come on! Straight people are moral? Some have affairs. Some look for prostitues. Is watching pronographic magazines immoral? Pass a law to ban it?
kkchanken 2 years ago 4
For a while I thought civil rights is non-existent in HK. May I say I'm so thankful that a mainstream media like Pearl took the initiative and investigate such bigot and twisted organisations. And to so many of those who'd stand up to fight for the vulnearble minorites in HK. Its about time!
boiaddicted 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a fascist this Mary Leung is. She is concern about her "right" to speak out against homosexual and "the danger of homosexual lifestyle" once the law of G&L protection passed!!!
What kind of "danger" is she implying? Is she suggesting heterosexual lifestyle is all "safe" then? She even condemned the law that protects maternity leave!!!! Thats coming from a woman!!! I m speechless.
gradiusRX 2 years ago
Comment removed
gradiusRX 2 years ago
stupid fatty, suck you tits
osmanovski 3 years ago
The woman actually tries to argue that human right includes the "right" to slander and discriminate against others, I am speechless. It is a travesty that such a hate group is actually teaching human right. Imagine the KKK lecturing on civil right.
oolve 3 years ago 2
Ok, I'm done with them, those f*cktards from The Truth Of Truth Light Society constantly try to enforce the view that homosexuality is harmful to people! Christians are bigot.
dreamy2 3 years ago
everyone please remember what the woman say, it is dangerous not to fire a pregnant employee! i hope she'd never get pregnant and so can always save her own job.
y10kamu 3 years ago
note that the lady here does not clarify what the "dangers of a homosexual lifestyle" are...
but btw, well done to pearl channel. very neutral and un-biased media, and leaves the audience to decide for themselves whether to believe the fascist.
from the 7th minute onwards it becomes kind of like the chaotic scenes in the fucked up american talk shows =)
inzithaksin 4 years ago
what they say is "responsibilty towards the society"
what they mean is "fascist neo-nazi dictatorship"
inzithaksin 4 years ago
It is very bias and disgusting comments from the Speaker of Truth Light Society , she spread out the wrong notion of human right to the public.
She generalize the homosexual people are the dangerous group with no proof !
do you think the Truth Light Society deserve to be the human right cop in Hong Kong ?
tomted02 4 years ago
條肥婆好撚樣衰,幾難有男人肯屌佢!
pulpauthor 4 years ago 20
please dont ever let hong kong turn into fascist with these folks
or else it will end up worse then tiananmen square @ june 4th.
jjbunny79 4 years ago
it is so dangerous for religion to go beyond religion, let alone getting into politics
annakaise 4 years ago
Click the user link "ikris" under the date!
All 3 parts are here!
zeroem 4 years ago
i hate both Christians and Homo people, done~
siuying1986 4 years ago
應該叫它做盲光社
mm0mm0 4 years ago 2
think about it in terms of da pregnant woman eg: should a law protect the woman in case she's fired unfairly due to her pregnancy, or should the employer be protected for his rights to fire an employee? the employer's right to fire an employee is already protected by legally recognized employment contracts. Now applying the same situation to a homosexual. Why is the Society worry about the right for an employer to fire someone? Could there be some other underlying motive?
hkpuipui99 4 years ago
Can you imagine if the British, pre-1997, refused to pass a law protecting Chinese Hong Kongers, because they say if the law is passed "British white people will have no right to speak out against the dangers of the Chinese people"?? .
The law protects minorities from being attacked or discriminated against and that is its only power. Don't get caught up in the confusion they are trying to stir up.
hkpuipui99 4 years ago
Everything boils down to this one line from the lady: "With this law people might not be able to speak out against the DANGER of homosexuality". They are protecting their rights of attacking another group, which is the exact problem the law is trying to prevent. What a bunch of close-minded hypocrites.
hkpuipui99 4 years ago
明光社不明光
披著羊皮的狼,打著光明旗號的黑暗支持者
donaldchan82 4 years ago 3
明光社 is right
now a day people just emphasize their rights, merely talk about their responsibilities
that's why you can see many kids now a day are very selfish, only care about themselves
in their mind, freedom = do whatever you want regardless of others
also, a question:
where is human rights from?
how about human responsibilities?
newtestube 4 years ago
++The United Nations International Bill of Human Rights states: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."
as for human responsibilities, search by yourself pls.
----------------
do you have any statistical data about "kids NOWADAYS are very selfish"?
and do you have done any research of how kids define "freedom"?
cazukee 4 years ago
I am not saying human beings shouldn't have dignity and rights, but often time they are over emphasized that it becomes their rights violates others' rights.
People merely mention responsibilities and care for one another, even fewer actually do it.
there is a survey ask student for the bad lanuguage habit, you didn't heard that? Also there were surveys asking students' alltitude about sexual intercourse.
please do some research on your own also.
newtestube 4 years ago
ever read the univeral decleration of human right from the UN?
jjbunny79 4 years ago
READ MY WORDS!!
"I am not saying human beings shouldn't have dignity and rights"
newtestube 4 years ago
Human dignity and rights can NEVER be over emphasized.
Dont try to use the failure of HK eduction as an excuse to downplay the significance of basic human rights protection.
Your argument is flaw. Either you have some serious problem with your logical thinking, or you are just a fascist.
gradiusRX 2 years ago
tell this to those kids that cursing with bad language around and smoking when they are younger than 10, and there is nothing the teachers and parents can do about it, because "kids have their rights", so you cannot discipline them.
newtestube 2 years ago
You still dont get it. The discipline issue of kids nowadays, is an entirely different topics. You cant use that as a reason to exclude the basic human rights from a particular group of population. These two are not mutually exclusive and should be tackled independently. You see the fallacy of your argument now?
For your own sake, I wish your dignity and rights will ever be at the mercy of someone with the mind set like yours.
gradiusRX 2 years ago
Comment removed
edgarcycheung 2 years ago
ask those anti-christ to eat shit and die (I'm speaking like a child... lol)
joshiko 4 years ago
Reverse discrimination : " DO we have the right to discriminate others?" Good point!
elmomie 4 years ago
So the Truth light society created another version of "Human Right", which they though is suitable for HK and taught it to the teachers....OMG
well i don't understand why homosexual is a lifestyle and dangerous!crap
circlearound 4 years ago
個女人講到最後已經無野好講, 亂咁講d唔知咩野黎「反駁」, 不知所謂。
rhythm2me 4 years ago 4
最後根本就係暗示個女人歧視緊人....話到明冇咁o既須要...hahahah
straysheep123 4 years ago 3
佢地根本就歧視同性戀
聽到個女人講既野真係好驚...
"DANGER OF HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE"???
so what sorts of danger does homosexual lifestyle bring???????
/_______\
yannienie 4 years ago 4
Homosexuality is NOT a lifestye! How can she be so ignorant? Nobody choose to be gay or lesbian. I'm so sick of seeing this society of untrue acts as agent of God Almighty and spreading hatred between gay and straight people.
bunny11k 4 years ago
明光社侵犯人權, 但他們去教人權, 真係有點不知所謂.
joyceky 4 years ago 4
奠光社:立法後,或限制批評同性戀生活的言論
tc155 4 years ago
Are there any part 4?
schgrass 4 years ago
the advancement of Human rights in hk is not up to int'l standard. hk need liberals
alfakapten 4 years ago
個8婆一尾識得推推推,屌
hifi220 4 years ago
明光社: o)
sora08141314 4 years ago 2
It is really great.
This Pearl report really reveals the truth of Society for Truth and Light
jackyhkcswcss 4 years ago