this video was made by carving each frame in a slab of stone and then witches would use photographic memory to take pictures of each frame and then copy it onto a holy "diskette"
@masterpatric07, dude: the Amiga was 32bit. I know because I used to program in 68k assembler. You might be thinking of the memory bus width, but the CPU was 32bit right from the first Amiga 1000.
Well, as a programmer, you can treat the system as fully 32 bit, and Pointers & data registers are all 32 bits long. However, the external bus and some of the internal microcode is 16 bit. But with Wikipedia calling it a "16/32 bit microprocessor" one answer won't please everyone :)
@xnonsuchx If you mean features as in the registers, yes, it was 32bit. They are rather the main parts of the cpu. However, it had a 16bit data bus and therefore the best way to think of it is a crippled 32bit processor. :-)
@gamewizard You're only half right. The Motorola was a 16/32 bit processor. It had 32bit wide registers and a 16bit data bus. Hence, it was actually both in many respects. So a 32bit processor bottlenecked by it's own data bus. :-) Later models such as the 68020 and 68030 had 32bit data buses and therefore could be considered true 32bit processors. :-)
A chip is only as fast as it's slowest part. It can still only pull data from RAM in 16-bit chunks regardless of how it is set up internally. I know how a 68000 is constructed inside and machines like the Atari ST and early Amigas and Macs were considered part of the 16-bit generation of home computers along with the 8086 and 80286 PC's.
@gamewizard You are correct as far as the 16bit data bus goes and how it interacts with memory. However, the fact is still there that it is a 16/32bit processor and not simply a 16bit processor. :-) Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered with 32bit registers.
que remenbers me trae esas computadoras
dampierer 3 months ago
tu pc funciona a 33 mhz ?
dampierer 3 months ago
i have Win7 x64 - is it compatiable?
nhking4 3 months ago
1992 WTF!
cenadaveen 7 months ago
can i run my atari 1040 st discs on my mac?
randiseriss 10 months ago
Hahaha look at them using it with a straight face
justinok67 10 months ago
this video was made by carving each frame in a slab of stone and then witches would use photographic memory to take pictures of each frame and then copy it onto a holy "diskette"
NickBlackDIN 1 year ago
This 18 year old video is hardly useful, wouldn't you think, for someone trying to use the damn thing?
RedDaVincy 1 year ago
Ballin Back in the Days. I had an Atari 800 in 82
BeatMakerTV 1 year ago
I ALWAYS REMEMBER OLD PCS LIKE 286 OR 386 WITH THE TURBO BUTTON @LOL
JOCKATEO 1 year ago
Good vid but that music makes my ears BLEED
rogerfalker1 1 year ago
"Hey, lets do the whole commercial sitting on the floor like kids!"
rherlitz 2 years ago
sorry dude amiga and atari st were not 8bit but 16 bits.
masterpatric07 2 years ago
@masterpatric07, dude: the Amiga was 32bit. I know because I used to program in 68k assembler. You might be thinking of the memory bus width, but the CPU was 32bit right from the first Amiga 1000.
Paradician 2 years ago
The 68000 (in both the Atari ST and original Amigas) is a 16-bit CPU (w/ some 32-bit features). So it can't really be called a 32-bit CPU.
xnonsuchx 2 years ago
Well, as a programmer, you can treat the system as fully 32 bit, and Pointers & data registers are all 32 bits long. However, the external bus and some of the internal microcode is 16 bit. But with Wikipedia calling it a "16/32 bit microprocessor" one answer won't please everyone :)
Paradician 1 year ago
@Paradician Alas not. :-)
deepblue69uk 6 months ago
@xnonsuchx If you mean features as in the registers, yes, it was 32bit. They are rather the main parts of the cpu. However, it had a 16bit data bus and therefore the best way to think of it is a crippled 32bit processor. :-)
deepblue69uk 6 months ago
@Paradician
The 68000 is a 16-bit processor not 32-bit. The 68020 and 68030 were 32-bit. Any Amiga with a 68000 is only 16-bit.
gamewizard 1 year ago
@gamewizard You're only half right. The Motorola was a 16/32 bit processor. It had 32bit wide registers and a 16bit data bus. Hence, it was actually both in many respects. So a 32bit processor bottlenecked by it's own data bus. :-) Later models such as the 68020 and 68030 had 32bit data buses and therefore could be considered true 32bit processors. :-)
deepblue69uk 6 months ago
@deepblue69uk
A chip is only as fast as it's slowest part. It can still only pull data from RAM in 16-bit chunks regardless of how it is set up internally. I know how a 68000 is constructed inside and machines like the Atari ST and early Amigas and Macs were considered part of the 16-bit generation of home computers along with the 8086 and 80286 PC's.
gamewizard 6 months ago
@gamewizard You are correct as far as the 16bit data bus goes and how it interacts with memory. However, the fact is still there that it is a 16/32bit processor and not simply a 16bit processor. :-) Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered with 32bit registers.
deepblue69uk 6 months ago
@Paradician I think I'd rather take your word for it because you've actually programmed in assembler. That is pretty hardcore. :-)
deepblue69uk 6 months ago
woahh check out the dos machine!!
macospat 2 years ago
truth is, it hurts my eyeballs
ReddRockin 2 years ago
Wow those were the days, 8bit isa.
oc5nsli341nforce4 2 years ago 6
nice mullet
rymoarizona 2 years ago
I been using Gemulator distro's on my notebook, but I never heard of prototype cards. When did you discontinue those?
symbolicXpixel 3 years ago
Windows 3.1 ou Macintosh ?
Processador 33 Mhz...!
Até mais....
eduardoorkut37 3 years ago
i want to download a windows 95 emulator to my vista machine so i can play old games. anyone know of a website that has a windows 95 emulator?
Annabolicenima 3 years ago
microsoft itself made an old windows emulators
check out on google
"microsoft virtual PC 2007"
jetpack1986 3 years ago
Holy Mother of a Cow this is like ancient video recording... Good video anyway...
austinjp11 3 years ago
Why even comment on a video you have no interest in, go play ball or something.
Nice video, thanks !
C9H17NO5 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no, illegal
CandGPxexpert 3 years ago
legal???
gunner9878 3 years ago
old ass film
DJx79x 3 years ago
#mullet inside#
turbolenza35 3 years ago
eh..... lol
dave00075ie 3 years ago
dumbass haircut
polishmade 3 years ago
That film is from the 90's how else would you explain the EMP interference?
neovonlink 3 years ago 2
tut tut tut quality!
simpson8griffen2 3 years ago
1st response!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;0
Grezaralpha 3 years ago