Added: 4 years ago
From: cristobaldominguez
Views: 84,623
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (209)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Heavy metal????? Wow....lol

  • I don't get it, they're asking Geddy Lee about the 'new album' and that interview from 1979. At that point Rush were working on Permanent Waves. Yet the video shows clips from Countdown and Subdivisions from the Signals album released in 1982...

  • @astrophysics123 The broadcast is from some years later. Much Music didn't start until 84 or 85, I think. Now, why they chose those particular songs, and not say something from Grace Under Pressure, I don't know.

  • @Kohntarkosz yeah it makes more sense, then

  • lol @ heavy metal.

  • Rush > VH. And Hagar is a douche.

  • the thumbnail for this video looks like he's being interviewed by some californian orange bud !!!

  • I have no idea how Ray Daniels as a manager works out for Rush. Obviously it works out ok.....but according to some behind the scenes in rock n roll....according to some other "bigshots" in the biz Ray is the biggest asshole alive.

  • ANY artist in Canada; Nickelback, Alanis Morrisette, Shania Twain, and yes, even Justin Beiber owe everything to Rush for being such a cool band and putting Canada on the musical map.

  • pop culture prophets ringing in my ears, mister ray daniels

    /watch?v=oIQ7YCTgtCk

    WHO DAT!

  • Ray Daniels, thanks for almost destroying Van Halen

  • @bigbrogiant4 Was about to post the same thing!! If Sammy's correct, this guy is a major cock!

  • hahahaha i love how they said the wrong names for the band members at the beggining

  • Ray Daniels reminds me of Sam Kinnison in this video! Keep waiting for him to start yelling.... "AAH...AAH...!!!!!"

  • >heavy metal 

  • It says 1979 sound check and interview, but at the end, they show video from 1982 Subdivisions. Perhaps the footage is combined from different years.

  • @gottarush Yeah, Countdown is also on the 1982 Signals album and that is featured too. The date has got to be wrong

  • Mr. Ray Daniels..., or what Ever your name is !!!

  • Countdown and Subdivisions are from the Signals album (1982), but I'm pretty sure the interview with Geddy Lee was from the mid 70s, so something is wierd with the timing, here.

  • @RCAvhstape Yeah the Geddy interview looks like it takes place before Permanent Waves in 1981 since he mentions the change in direction with only one "10 minute song". They must have recycled footage.

  • @RCAvhstape The soundcheck and Geddy's interview footage are from '79.

  • countdown!

  • Dude looked like Sam Kinison!

    "OOOHHH! OH OH OOOHHH!!!"

  • This is from 1979? At 1:10 there is footage of the song Countdown from the album Signals....but that wasn't released until 1982...the soundcheck is from 79? Or the interview?

  • lol @ Ray's hair

  • Thank God Rush is play Jacobs Ladder on they're Time Machine Tour this year!!! And The Camera Eye!

  • They are so not heavy metal-ists- they have there own genere its called rush !

  • This is a great bit of Canadian media history.......no one would play or give them a contract in Canada and had to make their name in the U.S.....what a shame.......jerks......and look how young J.D. Roberts looks......in case you don't know, he's was with CHUM FM for a long time before getting his haircut to got to CBS news, then CNN. He now uses his real name, John Roberts.....

  • Countdown rules.

  • the narrator guy is soo corny.

  • Ray Daniels is a douche

  • Holy wall of Oberheim's! and the Ob-1 soundcheck is cool to see and hear also!~:)

  • OK RUSH fans, do you people know WHAT a Jacobs Ladder is? If you don't, look it up, the song will be that much more intense, if thats possible.

  • @rushringsfanatic

    A "jacob's ladder" is a beam of sunlight stabbing it's way through heavy cloud cover...

  • the Geddy interview is talking about the Camera Eye from moving pictures of course.

  • No, he's talking about Natural Science. This was just before Permanent Waves was released.

  • It is heavy metal in seventies :)

  • heavy metal?

  • the definition of "heavy metal" has changed dramatically over the years

  • true true

  • Yes. You`re deffintly right. Heavy Metal has changed, its meaning has.

    imagine: JETHRO TULL (blues n prog rock) won an award for being the best Heavy Metal Band ever, so as you can see, the meaning is different now. But in my personal oppinion, I think thaat there are a lot of ppl talking about heavy metal, heavy rock, heavy prog, brutal rock, TERROR PUNK (?), and stuff....

    MUSIC IS MUSIC... stop puting names on it, just listen what you like and done. :D

  • It is heavy metal in seventies :)

  • I guess I missed when Jacobs Ladder is being played. The clips are from SIgnals (1982) and I guess their "next album" is Moving Pictures (1981), 10-min-piece being Camera Eye.

    Cool videos in spite of the "Lost"-time-travelling.

  • 0:35 - 0:46

  • At 0:35-0:46 they play an excerpt of "Jacob's Ladder".

  • Oh yeah, you're right, I missed it.

  • actually lilithudie he is not talking about moving pictures but it sounds like it but i watched the full interview and it was permanent waves he was talking about and that interview was from 1978 i thought

  • If the Geddy interview was from 79 he was talking about Permanent Waves, which was released New Years day 1980. 10 minute piece being Natural Science.

  • JACOBS LADDER, the most under rated Rush song of all time

  • agreed

  • @ACEBAKER911 That whole album is the most underrated Rush song of all time.....

  • @ACEBAKER911

    Wrong, I can think of quite a few Rush songs more under rated. Jacob's Ladder was at least played live on Exit Stage Left. Please try and find me live versions of the following tunes that AREN'T on bootlegs:

    1. The Necromancer

    2. The Fountain of Lamneth

    3. Cygnus X-1 Book II Hemispheres

    4. Losing It

    5. Kid Gloves

    6. Middletown Dreams

    Shall I go on?

    I love Jacobs Ladder, but it's hardly under rated.

  • But then in the middle and at the end of the interview, they are playing Subdivisions and a clip of Countdown which was on their

    1982 Album Signals. Must have been a later interview than 1979.

  • The interview was done before and then it was put onto what ever television show this is LATER.

    Notice how it said "Let's step back in time" at the beginning

  • Listen to Alex run through those crisp Punchy chords in Ladder, so cool

    way too short though, i wanna mear more vintage Jacobs ladder !!!!

  • My favorite band of all time.

  • was not subdivisions later then when this interview was recorded?

    And was not Geddy talking about Permanent Waves in that short interview?

    just wondering

  • Yeah, he's talking about Permanent Waves and the 10 min song he refers to is "Natural Science". This clip is from the City TV program 'The New Music" featuring a pre CNN JD Roberts. Rush rules y'all.

  • Rush IS heavy metal.. progreesive is a name created by the media

  • Getty made the statement that they simple think of themselfs as a rock

    band. I never thought of them as a

    metal act...they certainly don't sound

    metal. As far as progressive goes,

    yes, what they brought to rock

    was new therefore progressive, so

    that would be an appropriate discription.

  • And "heavy metal" isn't?

  • Rush is Rush, no one like them they are their own rock music catagory

  • uhmm rush is progressive

  • Rush is heavy metal?

    Ok then.

  • Weird. The piece is obviously produced after Signals was released. They must've been sitting on the interviews and soundcheck footage for awhile.

  • Thank god for Ray Daniels, huh? So weird hearing Geddy pitch the band's "new album," in 1979 which, even today, sounds WAY ahead of its time. RUSH rules!

  • Rush may be 'inspired' by Zeppelin (as many are), but Rush's roots are not in American blues.

    Many bands want(ed) to emulate Zeppelin, but you can't fake the magic. You either have it or you don't and Rush's is weak.

  • So what, Rush is influenced by Zeppelin, they don't sound anything like Zeppelin to me. There's no American Blues influence in Rush's music.

    Rush and Zeppelin are related in the sense they are under control of the queen, that's about it. She could order their demise, The queen pays no tax, they do.

  • The song Geddy is talking about being about 10 minutes long is "The Camera Eye" off of Moving Pictures which clocks in at 10:59.

  • Nobody wanted to sign Rush, they were a dime store version of Yes and Canadian to booot.

  • No they weren't. They were a dime store version of Led Zeppelin when they were trying to get signed with their first album.

  • Zeppelin's roots are in American Blues.

    Rush's roots are in prog rock, with no harmonics to Zeppelin other than feeble, intellectually minded attempts at esoteric song writing.

  • Uhhhhh, no. Rush's roots are in Led Zeppelin, Cream and The Who. Have you even heard the first album, or listened to them talk about their influences when they were kids? They were already two albums in before they got into the prog like Yes around the time of Caress of Steel, and one track off Fly By Night.

    Alex's favorite guitarist of all time is Jimmy Page.

  • And I would call Neil's lyrics anything but feeble. Sure he has a few stinkers here and there, but I'd still take them over Zeppelin lyrics any day.

  • "A funeral dirge for eyes gone blind"

    Like them or not, at least Plant could put artistic emotion vocally behind the lyrics he wrote.

    Geddy was/is literally singing 'cover' songs, someone else's material, as its clear he's not connected to Peart's juvenile intellect.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I had a few posts made in disagreement to these replies, but realized I don't really care, so I deleted them. I still disagree with you strongly, but believe what you will.

  • bollocks

  • bollocks

  • Comment removed

  • Hahah I'm sure. 'Oh ya, Rush isn't related to Led Zepplin at all, just because Lifeson's idol is Page and Rush's first album is unquestionably influenced by Zepplin doesn't change anything'. Whatever you say bud whatever you say.

  • @MrPelicanPants man there first albums sounds soooo different then fly by night fly by night is more modern then the first one and carres of steel was underated but on of there most prog album next to hemispheres a farewell to kings and 2112 then permanent waves was not as prog but more modern short songs

  • @zackjp I know that. What's your point?

  • @MrPelicanPants that is true also the added in one interview they also like pink floyd another greatband

  • @MrPelicanPants How about Steve Hackett and Steve Howe? Didn't he write Camera Eye as a tribute to Genesis? I read that in guitar world once.

  • @metalfiend124 It's quite possible but I don't recall. But the Camera Eye came at the tail end of their full-on "prog" period, where even long songs were still shorter. The question surrounded his biggest and earliest influences and the roots of the band. Steve Howe, Steve Hackett and all those other prog guys became influences years after Rush had already been established. They already knew how to play their instruments at that point, and were ready to branch out to more challenging things.

  • @metalfiend124 Hackett is amazing by the way. Absolutely love that guy. Once he and Gabriel left Genesis that was it for me.

  • @MrPelicanPants Agreed, Phil Collins era was so radically different. What did you think of the single GTR album with Hackett and Howe? My roommate, a guitarist, loved gtr but hated Yes and Genesis. I liked a lot of Hackett's Voyage of the Acolyte, which is what I think he made right after leaving Genesis. Lifeson loved that album, so I checked it out.

  • @MrPelicanPants Do you think Genesis gave Hackett enough spotlight time? Lifeson is more prominent in Rush's music than Hackett was to Genesis to me at least. Neil Peart described Genesis as a keyboard dominated band, and Lifeson was the main melody in Rush up until signals. What do you think?

  • @metalfiend124I think Genesis were boring turgid shit. At least Rush wrote and performed brilliant songs.

  • @MrPelicanPants they also idolized groups like pink floyd and the police (Neil), but your right - classic and blues rock is what they grew up on

  • @MrPelicanPants

    The new documentary about them proves what you said to be wrong. There influences whilst younger were King Crimson, Genesis and bands like that.

  • @Mrgyn That's funny. I've literally seen that documentary about 100 times now. Please give me a time reference where they mention King Crimson being an influence prior to recording their first album, because I don't remember that part anywhere. I only recall them talking about that once the first album was done and John Rutsey wasn't working out for health reasons and lack of interest in the direction they wanted to go.

  • @MrPelicanPants

    100 times now? Apparently you weren't paying attention any of those "100" times.

  • @Mrgyn Hahaha! Either find me a time reference in the documentary where they say King Crimson and Genesis influenced them prior to the first album (i.e. hard evidence that I'm wrong), or I'm done talking to you. :)

  • @MrPelicanPants

    Are you kidding me? Watch the actual documentary. The reason they split up with the original drummer (besides health issues) was they wanted to go in a more King Crimson, Genesis alternative rock direction. You got no idea what you're talking about.

  • @MrPelicanPants Exactly, the lack of interest in bands like King Crimson, Yes, Genisis, and Pink Floyd. Those are the influences of Geddy and Alex and thats the kind of music they wanted to make, and John was into bands like Bad Company. That line is alomst exactly what Geddy says in the documentry, go watch it. Mrgyn is right.

  • more bollocks

  • how sick is that short clip of Jacobs Ladder.. Would love to hear the whole tune.

  • The interviewer (at 1:43) is Canada's own JOHN ROBERTS, very young! Today is the anchor of CNN's "American Morning" in the USA. I remember when John was a MuchMusic host (Canada's MTV) when I was in elemantary school !

  • I'm another that listens to Rush almost exclusively, glad I'm not alone! A friend told me I was like Fry from Futurama - he likes to play Space Invaders while listening to his "all Rush mix tape". =)

  • "No other rock band in rock n' roll history has the integrity and longevity that Rush has. What sets them apart is they continue to evolve and explore new musical fromtiers. And ths, sets them apart. Cheers to all Rush fans everywhere and cheers to you for the great post....have a great day!"

  • You're absolutely right.

    And a great day to you

  • "Thank you!"

  • How could this be 1979 if they show a clip of "Subdivisions", and Signals wasn't out until.... 85?

  • WRONG. Signals came out in 1982

  • This is a MASHUP clip from Much Music in Toronto which included a clip from 1982's Signals

  • Signals came out in 1982 not 85, neither of you are right.

  • rush isnt heavy metal that if that guy thinks prog is heavy metal id hate to see what he thinks death metal is

  • Rush fit under the metal umbrella so deal with it.

  • Rush does´nt fit anything...it is JUST Rush: "uncomparable"....art Rock.

  • Just ask the band themselfs it it bothers them that alot of folks consider them Hard rock/Metal . They invented Prog/metal and thats why they dont mind apearing on shows like vh-1 `s That Metal Show or all the ducumentarys on Hard rock/Metal. Are they Judas Priest or Metallica ? hardly but they still have roots in hard rock/metal...FACT !

  • I wouldn't call Rush heavy metal. I would call them GODS though. prog / classic rock.

  • Rush is not necessarily heavy metal, but they were the first to venture into the world of progressive metal.

  • haha CANADA'S MOST SUCCESSFUL BAND EVER!

    has Canada had other successful bands?

  • exactly. the only successful canadian band just also happens to be the most talented and probably the best band in the WORLD!

    long live canada my country and of course, long live rush. the pinnacle of musicianship.

  • rago2112...

    Your words are so true here about Rush!

    Love your attitude here, I feel the same way... I mean, I don't really listen to anything other than Rush. If I want to change a vibe or whatever, I just select a different album of theirs and I find it.

    Prog rock, prog metal, etc. it's just simply uncomparable to anything else. There is music then there's Rush... What can't they play?

  • eexactly...

    they r so talented and so underrated..

    btw...it made me laugh when u say u dobt listen to much else other than rush becasue my friends laugh at me cuz i have every rush song and ONLY every rush on my ipod....o ther bands,,,just rush

    i dont think i have spoken truer words in my life...."[rush]...thepinnacle of musicianship.."

    (as stated in my previous comment)

  • BTO, The Guess Who, Mahogany Rush, The Band, Loverboy, Nickelback, UZEB, Simple Plan, Voivod, April Wine, Chilliwack,...

  • That interview with Geddy (from '79) is on the R30 bonus DVD.

    Long live Rush. :)

  • Their first few albums all have some pretty heavy songs on them. It's at least hard rock.

  • Uhh, Rush a "Heavy Metal Band?" Even for its time, I wouldn't say that. Sabbath would, scratch that, IS a heavy metal band.

  • This is from 1982 Dude not 79..

  • It's from different years. At one point it shows Ged bein' interviewed in 1979 and he's talking about songs that would end up on the Permanent Waves album and then it cuts to the song Count Down from the Signals album released in 1982.

  • Hahahaha f*** the napkin!

  • Ray Daniels looks like he is out of Spinal Tap.

  • me too

  • Why are they playing "Countdown" from Signals near the beginning if this is from 1979?

  • Very true... hmm... Rush rocks anyway!

  • It was a colage, produced years later. Watch closer. Peace on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  • Time machines.

  • Ray Daniels? or is it Rutger Hauer with long hair? something to think about!

  • Geddy Lee has fusion socks, fusion bass, and fusion spectacles, amazing they rock and rolla...

  • Archive classic ! This is fantastic footage, thanks for sharing ! Go GEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDYYYYYYYYYY­YYYYYY!

  • I was reading something about Jimmy page and he was asked is there any newer bands that he liked.he said he liked that band rush,this was in the seventies.

  • The guy interviewing Ray Danniels is JD Roberts, now known as John Roberts on CNN.

  • I think that the term progressive "rock" is both limiting and contradictory to itself. The word progressive often means highly artistic and stylistically limitless, when applied to music. As where the word rock alludes to simplicity and a narrowness of sound and concepts. That's why I consider Rush and such bands practitioners of progressive "music."

  • Sorry guys! We both got out of hand and I apologize to chisskkim. But I still thought the jibe was uncalled for!!! I would acept an apology if you will?

    Once again sorry dudes I mest up!

    By the way I love Rush. I own A Farewell to Kings, Hemishperes, Permanent Waves, Moving Pictures, Signals and Vapour Trail. They really do rock!

  • Okay basher, I accept your apology. Please accept mine as well. I can get a bit "heated" at times. lol

    And hey - I love Rush too. I'm a fan from way back. I saw them in concert numerous times in the 1970s. Though to be honest, they kind of lost me after Moving Pictures...

    I still think their performance at the Palladium in New York City on their Hemispheres tour was the best concert I ever attended in my life!

    Peace.

  • Give it a rest guys. Who is cleaverer than the other, more intelligent, pollitically correct...good GOD you guys irritate me. Why all the pointless bickering. I have said it many times and I will say it again it really doesn't matter. It is just music. A genre really has no baring on anything much. It is just a loose label to signify and broad trend in music history. But give up with the arguing it is so childish!!!

  • Oh yes... I have tremendous respect for internet trolls. Particularly ones who accuse people of being "childish" when they are little more than children themselves. Yeah.

    Listen idiot, if you have something substantial or meaningful to contribute to this conversation, post it. If not, learn to mind your own business and keep your snotty little insults to yourself.

    And for God's sake, if you feel you must post something, at least have the decency to use spell check - you semiliterate moron.

  • Well I think the term idiot is a fair discription of the sender, right?

    These internet trolls as you call them just like to stir up these silly little petty arguments.

    'Snotty little insults' is a bit harsh!!!...it is the principal not the people who get on my nerves.

    I am sorry you feel that my supposedly bad spelling get's you hot under the collar. But I mean come on...you think calling me a 'semiliterate moron' will solve things??

  • it's pronounced pee-urt! actually

  • ray daniels is ronson

  • Neil is looking damn good with those cool sunglasses on.

  • Rush... Heavy Metal? Absurd. Back in the day they were a hard rock band with heavy progressive influences. They were not "metal" in any sense of the term.

    And personally, I think it's creepy (and dishonest) the way metal enthusiasts are always desperately trying to claim classic hard rock bands "as their own".

    As if a blues-based hard rock group like Led Zeppelin really has any meaningful connection to some crappy 80s thrash metal act :)

  • chissykim, you clearly have no sense what the term "heavy metal" means. Aerosmith, Led Zeppelin, and early Rush are solidly in the category of early heavy metal. There's not enough space here to really go into the history, but if you actually took a moment to educate yourself about the history of heavy metal instead of calling it "crappy," you might learn that a "blues-based hard rock group like Led Zeppelin" is the DEFINITION of early heavy metal. "As if"? Ha.

  • You're right, there really isn't enough space here to go into the history... the history of how a bunch of metal enthusiasts (aficionados of a genre that really doesn't have any roots - unless you consider noise, bad taste, and fast mindless repetition, "roots") decided to appropriate classic rock lineages and call them their progenitors in a desperate attempt to give metal some musical legitimacy.

    These enthusiasts write articles, they propagandize... But sayin it's so doesn't make it so :)

  • I can still remember hearing Robert Plant interviewed on an NYC Rock Station in 1989 (how old were you then sparky? About 7?) During this interview Plant vehemently denied that Zeppelin was heavy metal or related to metal in any organic way. And when asked his opinion of metal bands -- he called them garbage, and went into quite some detail slamming them - the long and short of which was that he viewed them as a bunch of talentless posers.

  • So Robert Plant didn't want to be associated with heavy metal (in 1989, of all years). Your point? Debussy never liked being called an impressionist, as he considered it belittling (and the term was originally intended as such), but he is considered the archetype for Impressionism in music. Just because someone does or doesn't want to identify with a particular genre has no bearing on whether their music IS actually part of that genre or not.

  • If Plant's comments about metal were a one-off, your point might be valid. His opinion might just be an aberration. But the fact is, his comments are representative of a general feeling in the music industry. There are many classic rock bands that are on record as denying any musical relationship to heavy metal -- despite the vociferations of metal enthusiasts desperately trying to claim them as their own.

  • Geddy has said they've never really considered themselves to be a "progressive rock band," but do you go around belittling the intelligence of anyone who refers to Rush as such? (Well, maybe you do--you seem like that kind of person.) Just because you have an irrational hatred of this particular genre of music and an undeserved feeling of superiority over its listeners ("sparky"?), does not negate the fact that early Rush had many of the hallmarks of early heavy metal.

  • I would never belittle the intelligence of someone who claimed that Rush was a progressive rock band. Reason? Their assertion would have some basis in fact. Rush never hid the fact that they were big fans of prog rock and that their music was heavily shaped and influenced by it. But for someone to claim that Rush is a metal band is just plain dishonest.

  • And ajc06, for the record, I feel no superiority in this matter. People have different musical tastes. I accept that.

    The fact is, you're just a condescending jerk ("if you actually took a moment to educate yourself"? lol) That's why I call you sparky :)

  • he pronounced neils name wrong

  • they always seem to!

  • i meant the story not the interview lol

  • the soundcheck was from 79..i dont think the interview is

  • The description says 1979 but there are songs from Signals in the piece.

  • Signals? naaaaa

  • Yeah, it's Countdown and then Subdivisions.

  • YEsss .. sounds awesome!!! Nice clip.. I need more of these rare clips to be uploaded on here! Anyone got more?? Please get them on here! :-) Ty

  • lol, did anyone notice that when they named them they said the names all wrong. "These three guys: Geddy Lee (while the camera is on Alex) Alex Lifeson (camera on Neil) who couldn't pay a record-company to release their first album"...

    and yeah... since when did Rush start playing heavy metal? Media artards..

  • Rush is psuedo-metal, they feel of their music is metal, double bass, lots of low down bass parts, guitar is most on bottom strings, ect ect

  • well still, it's not even close to heavy metal or metal at ALL...

  • yeah , the earlier stuff , a lot of it , was as METALLIC as it got...partiularly for the era....do u even own , or have u HEARD the first 5 to 6 studio albums?..HEAVY

  • I would call it progressive rock...

  • Heavy Metal.. Ya gotta admit that some of the early songs RUSH did were pretty heavy.They smoothed out over the years but even today they can let it rip. I'd put Alex up against some of the biggest metal guitarists. Ya ever listen to his solo album? Some serious riffing there.