Added: 1 year ago
From: aDetectiveA
Views: 10,099
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,036)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • epic music, what is it called

  • What about Quantum physics...? Where science & religion meet.

  • LOL, a friend(christian)linked me here. see i got no problems with his or your idea's on bible and evolution, the problem i have is when you go sooo far to prove me wrong with nothing. you have a bible, and i have a big book of science. He is my friend, and somehow we get along just fine until he starts telling me that im wrong, and i should change. i never do that to him. slam a book of science down on his face and prey to Da'vinci that he be saved thru it. seems pointless, like the video.

  • I know a mistake in the bible. Kings 7:23

    Now he made the sea of cast metal ten cubits from brim to brim, circular in form, and its height was five cubits, and thirty cubits in circumference.

    The circumfrence is 2(pi)r, therefor it would be 31.4...cubits in circumference.

  • 6:29 "And then we boiled by son, and ate him."

  • To the guy who made this video:

    Atheism does not need proof. The "lack of believe on something" never needs testing. Is THE BELIEVE on something what always needs EVIDENCE.

    Please probe to me that Unicorns are not real. (If you are an a-unicornist). But if you meet someone that claims that Unicorns exist, you ARE going to ask him proof.

    Can you imagine a Unicorn believer replying to you: "Oh well probe me Unicorns aren't real"?

    Unicorns, Gods (Jesus, Zeus, Whatever), and Leprechauns.. The same.

  • I guss you won't have your proof of a god, because when you die , party is over. This is really, really hard for theists to except. You are not important, and by believing in religion, , your god takes care of of your nastiness., not your fault, it makes life so much easier.To not think.

  • Where did the Bible come from or better yet why did god wait the 200,000-100,000 years to reveal himself to man? Also if the bible Is the word of god why isnt it taken 100% to the point. My final point is if I'm a good person selfless and willing to do all I can to help others, why am I still destined to go to hell because I don't have a religious belief?

  • 0:57 You're definition of 'atheist' is wrong. Atheism is a lack of belief, not a disbelief. Subtle, but different.

    1:07 Theists make the claim that God *does* exists, so the burden of proof is on them.

    1:34 A Christian will *always* loose an argument about God if all he/she has it the very book the idea came from.

    2:24 Selling my daughter into slavery, slaughter a town and keep their virgin females for myself?

    2:34 To convince themselves or for a sense of superiority. The latter explains lying.

  • Well, it most certainly DOES make us "right on all arguements [sic] against theists".....because well, we are.

  • This video is so redicilous, did a preschool child make this?

  • @blodigfisk

    "Rediculous" is actually "ridiculous."

  • @5jerry1 thanks? atleast you understood what i ment, thats the point.

  • @blodigfisk

    Putting things like "rediculous" and "ment" only kills your case. I agree with your point, but the way you posted doesn't look too bright either. Don't look like an idiot yourself while calling someone else one. It doesn't look good, no matter what your opinion is.

  • @5jerry1 I don't care if you think I look like an idiot. My vocabulary is limited since my english isn't that good. I atleast try to be understood and it worked, nuff said.

  • @5jerry1 and what if i had dyslexia.. You wouldn't know.

  • A little proof reading to find all the typographical errors may have helped your case a little bit more.

  • @FloatingJetsam

    Exactly

  • False, you can use any verse in the bible to argue for absolutely anything. You can use it for weed, no gay marriage, health care, vegetarianism, nudity, anarchy, death sentence, gangs, pipelines, slave labor, war. . . . . .

  • it doesnt add things to our lives it takes away some of the bullshit religion brings into it though

  • You are asking people who don't believe in something to prove it isn't there. If I tell you I don't have any sons or daughters, the proof is their absence. They aren't there, so how do I prove I don't have any? If you make a claim that I have them, it is ON YOU to provide the proof. An Atheist simply doesn't believe. You make the positive claim, so it's ON YOU to prove it, just like the kids analogy.

    P.S. And please, spell things right; it really adds credibility. How old are you, eight?

  • @5jerry1 Even though they cannot be proved scientifically, Stephen Hawkins uses theories about alternate universes, and paradoxes dealing with the matter, to explain things he does not know. How is this any different from the belief in God? You cannot use the argument you tried there, because it could just be turned around, because MOST atheists accept what Mr. Hawkins states, valid or unknown, they believe in him. You cannot prove, neither can I. Difference is, what is behind death.

  • @3nergybomberic

    First of all, "Hawkins" is " HAWKING." Again, get it right. Using observable evidence to figure out how things happen in the cosmos, based on empirical evidence is far more sensible than anthropomorphically saying "God did it." And my paternity argument is a water-tight analogy. Absence is it's own proof. I say I have no kids. Their absence is the proof. It's self-evident, as is Bible God's absence.

  • @5jerry1 Haha sorry... Hawking. And you have a strong point there, with the children. In my opinion, science and religion should be able to live together. I cannot see one without the other. Okay, with the children analogy, we could pick it apart just like everything else, if we get into 'how' and 'why' they are missing. We would be off subject, but it would loop around eventually. Nothing can be proven like that, my argument I could make though, is God doesn't allow us evidence.

  • @3nergybomberic

    Admitting to a mistake does help one's case. :-)

    People of faith shouldn't pretend to be scientists. Graduating Divinity School doesn't qualify someone to posit the physical origins of the universe, if, in fact, it even had a beginning. Scientists and physicists only try to explain how it all happens. God or no God, scientific phenomena does happen, whether God causes it or not. Science is the study of the process, not the reason.

  • @5jerry1 I am not saying I am a scientist! Ha, I am merely saying, I believe in science. That is a ridiculous thing most atheists say about theists, is that we do not believe in science..

  • @3nergybomberic

    Most Theists think their beliefs trump decades of scientific study, and that's asinine. The literalist "Young Earth" mindset is worthy of every bit of ridicule it gets, and I am very generous in obliging. I don't adhere to hard Atheism, though I do lean toward that on most points. Things originally believed to be of spiritual origin can be explained rationally in virtually all cases. Victims of Tourette's, for example, were believed to be possessed. And so on.

  • @5jerry1 I think it is crazy when people say theists think science is evil too.. because I enjoy learning about science.. In fact, I am opting into some physics classes my next two semesters.

  • @3nergybomberic

    I hope you do well in that. I have never actually studied that, but physics would be interesting.

  • @5jerry1 As, when I die, I lose nothing if I am wrong, nor do I gain anything. If you die, you lose everything after you die, while if you are right, you gain nothing.

  • @3nergybomberic

    Pascal's Wager. What if we]re both wrong? Then we'll be in the same place.

  • So many things here that are either completely wrong or complete lies..

    One thing I'll pinpoint is that Atheism is not the belief that "There is no god".

    It is the statement of "I do not believe in a god".

  • 2 kings 2:23 read it tell me, who is bad guy.

  • So I need PROOF to deny a claim that has no evidence? Well. I'll get to God as soon as I'm done "disproving" unicorns, dragons, FSM, flying pigs, threeheaded hellhounds, Zeus, living Pokemon, hobbits, ghosts, fairys, imps, magic, Yoda, the Thing, zombies, and the Devil. I mean, since we can't deny ANYTHING unless theres somthing that proves it wrong, even if there IS NO EVIDENCE for it, right :D?

  • It was good all the way up untill 1:10. Thats when everybody whips out their argumentguns.

  • Never claimed it did. Though as a great man once said it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool then to speak and remove all doubt. Theists on youtube speak so loud, it's hard not to yell back "shut up, you are being stupid trying to prove your god!"

  • Atheism is not what you think it is. I apologize. You have been misinformed.

  • I don't know, this is actually a fairly refreshing viewpoint. I, personally, am quite sick of the depressingly large number of folks who decided to become an atheist simply because 'all the smart kids are doing it.' And, of course, the argument etiquette is just gravy.

    Really, apart from the whole 'god exists' thing, this is a pretty nice video. Liked.

  • @othesemo

    You actually found this video refreshing? It's utterly riddled with lies and inaccuracies. It's like a 13 year old made it. What the fuck is wrong with you people?

  • Spell "evolution" right please. Otherwise, good video!

  • I actually like this video. I agree with everything except "Athesm doesn't add anything to your life that you can't get from theism."

    I love to ask this question of creationists IF they're willing to take it seriously. If an alien race of beings with technology far in advance of our own were to land on Earth and commune with us, what would you tell them if they asked the age of the Earth?

    It may seem unlikely, but they might be interested in our estimate of our planet's age.

  • And I quote "Being an atheist doesn't make you: scientist" Not a good start my friend, not a good start.

  • You may have a bit more credibility if you don't misspell every other word.

  • Comment removed

  • I stopped watching when you capslocked the THEORY at the end of the Big Bang. If you don't understand what a scientific theory is, you shouldn't be commenting on it.

  • I'm an atheist but I gave this video a like for the music.

  • This video is so stupid it made me laugh, I don't know whether to give it a thumbs up or thumbs down.

  • And the rest of the video is just plain stupid. Really. If you pray for "us" we will think for you. You are welcome.

  • 0:58 Wrong. Atheism is the lack of belief that there is a god. This is neither a belief or a regligion. SOME atheists may go a step further and say that they do belief that there is no God. Depending on their justification (and the specific idea which of the discussed God) this is also not necessarily a religious statement.

  • rational*

  • Comment removed

  • Oh jesh. "Atheism has nothing to do with science." 30 seconds later: "So atheists, try and give evidence and proof that atheism is right!" The Irony is so juicy.

  • Being an atheist doesn't make you smart.

    But beings smart makes you an atheist!

  • Christine belief were god aloud them to own slaves including the wife and sell them as if they were one not excluding making ur wife you're ho or making you're youngest go work the corner and that's you're right as a man..... what was that passage throw a thousand men he found one wise man.... and in women he found none oh and every day joes were not aloud to read the bible only high priest(or w/e) could back in the day. look at all your're religions rules not just the ones you know and follow

  • This video is great! Really speaks the truth about Atheists. and of course, your like bar is FULL of thumbs down because the Atheists cant handle this truth, that just because your an atheist doesnt mean your smart, rational, scientific, Etc.

    Thats some intense piano playing, BTW.

  • I do not mind that you believe in a god, just as long as you do not get into politics and try to pass your beliefs into laws that I must follow. I do not want to argue with you and I don't even have any points to argue other than the previous statement. Peace. ;)

    P.S. Leave gay people alone. Most theists who are against gays are just repressing their own desires and have to punish those who are enjoying something that their god doesn't allow.

  • @TheRobGD I'd prefer if theists, at least the ones that actually have writings in their holy texts against gays, actually were against them. It's dishonest to say "I believe the Bible is the infallible word of God, but it's archaic and some of what it says doesn't apply to a modern society like ours."

  • I was with you for like the first 30 seconds, but then your bias showed HARDCORE and I stopped taking you seriously.

    And I've won against Christians using the bible, because I know more about it than they do.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It's kind of difficult to prove the Big Bang, but it's only a theory for how the universe came to being. Evolution is the good stuff, because there is tangible evidence for it. But the existance of God is just an idea, which has been obtained from the minds of philosophers, who just made things up as they went along. This is different from scientific theory.

  • Comment removed

  • thumbed up for 0:48-0:54

  • Seriously, dude... if you want to be taken seriously, get serious: learn how to spell!

  • Does being a theist prevent you from using spellcheck? Is that another part of evil science?

  • Well, at least I can spell and use proper grammar.

  • Comment removed

  • Isn't that cute... A christian claiming to know how atheists think.

  • @DarthMagnus19 it was pretty accurate to most atheists.

  • Ok, this is how I became an atheist. I started questioning why I was a christian and after months/years of various research on the history and philosophy of this religion, I drop my belief in christianity. I have no reason to believe that any other religion is correct either so there are 2 position I could logically take. 1. Deism or 2. Atheism. I chose the latter because I haven't been convince yet that there ever was a supernatural being who created the universe. So no I can't "prove" atheism.

  • You know how I can prove there's no god... This video has 398 dislikes and only 41 likes... Atheists for the win... Oh and there's no such thing as "Atheesm"

  • @supergoalie3301 says"I can prove....this vid has 398 dislikes and only 40 likes ....."

    -----------------

    LOL

    That's old news.

    ABOUT 2000 YEARS OLD NEWS!!!

    Matt.7:13-14 told how many would be saved and how many were going to be lost.

    And your numbers show this passage to be true.

  • @supergoalie3301 ""398 dislikes and only 41 likes""

    You have only proved that atheists like watching and commenting on these youtubes more than theists.

  • ok now remake that same video but take the NOT out of BEING ATHEIST DOES "NOT" MAKE YOU

  • I've had christians tell me that they pray to a completely different god than muslims (ignoring the story of Issac and Ishmael), I've heard some say that Noah's Arc is parable, some say it's truth. A christian woman once told me that Eve and the serpent never spoke, the genesis account obviously discredits this. Many christians have no idea that god's law obliges a rape victim to marry her rapist.

    Also, I made it half way through your video before I stopped counting the spelling errors.

  • By the way, when will people start learning anything abuot logic? Every time i see theists arguing and trying to use logical statements, they fail by defenition. If you want to operate formal logic, learn it first, ok?

  • Well, i can clearly see how believing in god improved your english.

  • Second half of the video made me lol

  • some atheists have read the bible because of Christians saying read the bible and you will be converted(well not exactly but u get the idea) and heave read it, seen lots of verses that are immoral and some tell the story differently, not what happened but the 'facts'. some have also uploaded videos to tell people this. also there are still a lot of Christians that haven't even read half the bible. atheists can use the bible to falsify itself but theists can't do the same w/ science without fail

  • Give me proof that not beliving in Santa Clause is correct.Oh you cant? Then by your 'logic' he must be real.

  • Atheists do not need to provide proof that god doesn't exist. The burden of proof lies with the person making a claim. It is exactly the same as me asking you to prove there are no invisible dragons. The bible is not proof, nor is anything inside of it evidence. It is a book full of hearsay and contradictions. Also you cannot group atheists. It's not a group like christians or catholics. The only common belief is that there is no god. Evolution/big bang are not part of atheism.

  • @1csrichardson says="atheists do not need to provide proof that god doesn't exist.The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim."

    -------------------------

    Exactly!

    And you are making the claim that there is no god.

    So prove it!

    But you can't , can you?

    Really I don't see why atheists are so upset.

    Is it you're all really so scared that you are wrong that you keep asking for proof?

    Where did the idea of prove come from?

    GOD never told anyone to PROVE that HE exists.

  • @ekajeht so much wrong in one comment its even impressive. For starters, idea of proof came with scientific method. A method that has numerous times shown its efficiency in distinguishing truth from fantasy. Its common sense in this day and age! Secondly, rejection of god is not a claim, its a reply to a theistic claim. And that rejection takes place, due to the lack of evidence for the validity of original claim. Again, simple! Very poor rationalization of your part!

  • @eleminatus Wow!

    A post that is nothing but your own pea brain opinion.

  • @ekajeht opinion? where in my reply is opinion? Scientific method is not opinion!

  • @eleminatus says=" scientific method is not opinion'

    --------------

    Maybe I should have said you base your belief on faith

  • @ekajeht what are you talking about? what belief?!

  • @eleminatus Do you believe in the science theory of the big bang?

    Or how about the theory of evolution?

    Or maybe the fact that Pluto is a planet?

    Oh wait a min. Science just changed their facts on that one about Pluto and planets!

  • @ekajeht omg, can you stick to a single topic?! How the hell is science changing and improving a bad thing? Scientists made a definition of a planet more specific. How is that bad?! Tell me, how is that bad?

    Oh, and yes, I do believe in evolution and big bang. And no faith is required for that, since there are overwhelming evidence in support of those theories!

  • @eleminatus over whelming evidence for the big bang??

    Where did the matter and energy come from to create the big bang?

  • @ekajeht Nobody knows! So what?

  • @eleminatus says=" no body knows! so what"

    ----------------

    LOL

    You say nobody knows ,,but yet you believe in a theory by "faith"

    The same thing you condem the christian for our base of belief ,,and here you are with the SAME faith to back your belief.

    You base your beliefs on science with no evidence other than " I don't know" or faith.

    Which has been proven wrong many times.

    I base my beliefs on GOD which is NEVER wrong.

    Looks like you're the idiot or should I say fool?

  • @ekajeht wow.. I would suggest you read on Big bang. Or actually, any scientific book for that matter. Not knowing where all the matter and energy came from, does not make Big Bang invalid. This theory is supported by other types evidence like expanding universe or cosmic background radiation. Origin of matter is completely irrelevant for the truthfulness of this theory. So I dont need faith for it, I have hard evidence. Unlike you! Research before typing stupid things!

  • @eleminatus says="this theory"

    ---------------

    You say "theory" instead of fact.

    Is that because it hasn't been PROVEN beyond any doubt as of yet?

  • @ekajeht look up what a theory is in scientific community, and maybe then you can try to pretend you know something! Gravity or atoms or germs are also theories, Mr. genius! Come on, use better arguments! This is pathetic!

  • @eleminatus germs are theories?

    LOL

  • @ekajeht yap, look under "germ theory"! May learn a thing or two!

    On the other hand, you are a religious zealot. Learning is probably pain-inducing for you!

  • @ekajeht

    gravity is a theory, please jump off a building to test it...

  • @j919or

    wow, the list of people whom the education system has failed just never ends does it.. go back to jerry Spring videos, thats about all you can handle obviously.

  • @eleminatus Personally I have no trust or belief in the theory of aerodynamics, we all know that boeings are all smoke, mirrors and hypnosis.

  • @sheikhyaboooty oh no, you have cracked the conspiracy of the plane-manufacturing companies.They gonna be after you. Quickly, hide!

  • @ekajeht You must not know what theory means in the scientific community. It's not a stab in the dark like the average person would use it. It's the results that a scientist comes up with after much research and experimentation. Neuton's theory of relativity is also a theory but despite the what the bible says, everyone knows that the earth revolves around the sun.

  • @DarthMagnus19 @eleminatus F&W DICTIONARY-

    THEORY=1.A PLAN OR SCHEME EXISTING IN THE MIND ONLY.

    So believing in your theories boils down to you having FAITH that they are correct.

    Because they are not proven fact.

  • @ekajeht World English Dictionary-

    Faith: 1. strong or unshakeable belief in something, esp without proof or evidence

    There is evidence of scientific theories. Your argument is invalid. Have a nice day, sir.

  • @werebee theory=plan or scheme existing in the mind only.

    That they are not called the FACT of evolution or the big bang FACT

    So keep believing in them on faith alone.

  • @ekajeht You're obviously confusing a scientific theory for whatever you use the term 'theory' for. A Hypothesis is something that's untested and unproven. Once said hypothesis is proven to be accurate then it's upgraded to a theory. You can put up a better argument than "You believe in something that's been proven to be scientifically accurate on faith alone."

  • @DarthMagnus19 When it is up graded to FACT then you can believe it without faith.

    But until then it's only faith you have.

  • @ekajeht lol... I do love the internet. People can just have an opinion based on nothing. You are aware that there are 2 meanings to the word "theory" right? It is a FACT but you are using the term "theory" in common language as meaning just a "hunch" when it means quite the opposite in the scientific community. Theory in the sense you are refering to I already defined for you. You should really do some research if you're gonna actually try to debate this because you're obviously confused.

  • @DarthMagnus19 says="It is a fact'

    ------------------

    LOL

    You mean you WISH it were a fact.

    Or are you talking about the math theory of 1+1=2?

    Oh wait a min. That isn't a theory ....it's a fact!

    LOL

    Did you ever notice how some sceintific theories have been known to change?

    So much for your theories as facts!

  • @ekajeht A theory is a scientific explanation of an observed phenomenon. Unlike laws, theories actually explain why things are the way they are. Theories are what science is for. If, then, a theory is a scientific explanation of a natural phenomena, ask yourself this: "What part of that definition excludes a theory from being a fact?" The answer is nothing! There is no reason a theory cannot be an actual fact as well.

  • @ekajeht In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanation for our observations. It ties together all the facts about something, providing an explanation that fits all the observations and can be used to make predictions. In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation. It's as close to proven as anything in science can be.

  • @DarthMagnus19 SAYS="it's close"

    ---------------

    Close ...but no cigar!

    Sorry but you wishing,, still doesn't make it a fact!

  • @ekajeht Maybe you didn't read my post. There's nothing in the scientific term of "theory" that excludes it from being a fact. And that sir is a fact... whether you believe it to be so is something else entirely.

  • @DarthMagnus19 says="there's nothing in the scientific term of 'theory" that excludes it from being fact"

    ----------------

    Nope, nothing at all....except that many times your factual theory IS WRONG !!!

    lol

    Examples =expanding earth theory,,blank state theory,,static universe theory.

    All these "THEORIES" that YOU consider facts ...WERE WRONG!

  • @ekajeht Some very nice examples indeed. There are some problems with them though. The Blank Slate theory (although the topic to many debates much like the theory of evolution) has never been disproven as you say. Expanding Earth and Static Universe however were not theories. Both were a hypothesis. Again you confuse the meaning of the word "Theory."

  • @DarthMagnus19 So it's a theory( theory= fact) until it's proven wrong then it goes back to just being a hypothesis!

    Sorta like getting busted in a lie ,,then saying you were only joking?

  • @ekajeht Not exactly. Expanding Earth or Static Universe were never theories. When something is a hypothesis it means that it's their prediction of what experimentation and research will result in. If the hypothesis is correct then it becomes a theory if not, then whatever the result of the experiment was becomes the theory. So when you say theories are based on faith i believe you are refering to a hypothesis not a theory.

  • @DarthMagnus19 So tell me where and from what the big bang THEORY started.

  • @ekajeht

    Atheists and scientists do not claim to have all the answers, that would be LYING which is why only christians do that. However just because there are things we have not explained YET, you cannot jam your invisible friend in there and claim he did it.

    Your god is nothing but an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance, I just destroyed your point and your religion, good night.

  • @aegisgfx ""receding pocket of scientific ignorance""

    You just claimed that science was ignorant, when u said that it doesnt claim to have all the answers. Now you claim that god is nothing but the ignorance of science. The irrationality of atheists is amazing !

  • @j919or

    science is ignorant about lots of things, thats the great thing about it, it DOESN'T CLAIM TO HAVE ALL THE ANSWER LIKE ASSHOLE RELIGIOUS PEOPLE DO!

  • @aegisgfx says="science is ignorant of a lot of things"

    ---------------

    Congrats!

    I'm glad I finally got that through to you.

  • @ekajeht

    FUCKHEAD LISTEN. SCIENCE NEVER CLAIMS TO HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS, ONLY RELIGIOUS LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU DO THAT.

  • @aegisgfx says=" FUCKHEAD....ASSHOLES"

    -----------------

    I put you in the corner ,, do I need to get the soap for that mouth of yours?

  • @ekajeht

    go molest a child, thats the only thing christians are good at apparently.. 'thinking' is clearly impossible.

  • @aegisgfx says=" go molest a child"

    -------------

    ???

    You have proven that when confronted with the truth ,,you can't handle it!

    So you go on these childish hissy fits again and again.

  • @aegisgfx ""molest a child, thats the only thing ""

    There are evil ppl in every group. Jesus predicted false christians and false doctrine. The RCC is the false doctrine and the molester and the tool of satan ot deceive the masses that dont want God but want to appease God.

  • @j919or

    Sorry there is another thing christians are very good at, covering it up when one of their own is a serial child rapist. I apologise for omitting that fact earlier.

  • @j919or

    oh great, another person who is too stupid to even have a grade 4 understanding of how science works, chiming in on youtube... sheesh

  • @ekajeht

    you mean like the way you wish your invisible friend is real? ya, thats what I thought you brainless miracle.

  • @ekajeht - "You mean you WISH it were a fact."

    You mean you wish it were not a fact, evolution is real and a proven fact. If it weren't, we'd have no biology or medical science, I hope you can be healed by god next time you go to the hospital if you don't believe science is real. Pray harder!! LOL

  • @ekajeht

    I have a reasonable amount of faith and a ton of evidence that you are a brain dead idiot

  • @ekajeht

    no faith is all YOU have, because your brain is too small to understand anything else.

  • @aegisgfx ""brain is too small ""

    Actually all of our brains have great unused capacity but we lack the 6th sense of the spiritual. Therefore we are dead spiritually and facing eternal death unless we admit our hopeless helpless state and cry out to God for help.

  • @j919or

    Prove any of that, I dare you. You really are too dumb to live, please die and go be with your gods, do us all a favor.

  • @aegisgfx Neither “dark matter” (created to hold the universe together) nor “dark energy” (created to push the universe apart) has been seen or measured (w). We are told that “most of the universe is composed of invisible dark matter and dark energy (x).” Few realize that both mystical concepts were devised to preserve the big bang theory.

  • @aegisgfx If a big bang occurred, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been made. For every charged particle in the universe, the big bang should have produced an identical particle but with the opposite electrical charge (s). (For example, the negatively charged electron’s antiparticle is the positively charged positron.) Only trivial amounts of antimatter have ever been detected, even in other galaxies

  • @aegisgfx The big bang theory, now known to be seriously flawed (a), was based on three observations: the redshift of light from distant stars, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, and the amount of helium in the universe. All three have been poorly understood.

  • @j919or

    and if that were true, you'd be on the cover of Discovery magazine instead of christian paedophiles weekly. hey if you are so sure you are going to live forever and be best friend with jesus, why don;t you just go be with him now? Why wait 70 or 80 year in this evil place that you hate so much and don't think is real? If you had any fucking balls you would do it, thats fact that you can't PROVE you don;t really believe in heaven.

  • @ekajeht Look, I just defined the word faith for you. It is belief without evidence. There is evidence of both evolution and the big bang.

  • @werebee says="there is evidence of both evolution and the big bang"

    -------------------

    LOL

    And there is MORE evidence that shows that both THEORIES did not and could not ever happen.

    But you having so much "FAITH " in both THEORIES"

    You can't accept the truth.

  • @ekajeht No there isn't. Show me one iota of evidence proving both theories didn't happen. And what's the truth? A wizard did it?

  • @werebee Show me one iota of evidence proving ..didn't happen"

    -----------------

    They never happened.

    Can't prove a negative.

    If you have faith in the big bang theory ,, then where did the matter and engery come from that caused it?

  • @ekajeht It is thought that before it happened it was all at a single point. Where did God come from?

  • @werebee says="Where did GOD come from?"

    --------------

    So I see you are unable to back up your faith in the big bang with facts ...so instead of answering my question, you ask me a question.

    If you are so sure of the big bang because you have proven factual theories then surly you would know where and from what it started.

    If not, then you are believing in some man's fairy tale.

  • @ekajeht No one claimed it was a fact you stupid fuck. The evidence for the big bang is that the universe seems to be expanding and that there is background radiation in space. Go look this shit up you ignorant fuck.

  • @werebee SAYS=" no one claimed it was a fact you stupid fuck"

    ----------------------

    If you were to read what was said on this thread you would have seen your friend stated that a scientific theory was indeed a FACT.

    BTW- It's fun watching you resort to childish name calling when you get yourself backed into a corner.

  • @ekajeht I was driven to anger because you keep saying the same thing over and over, even when I defined faith for you. It is belief without evidence. You can have faith in God because there is no evidence for him. You can have faith in Santa Clause because there is no evidence that he actually exists. You can't have faith in scientific theories because they are based on evidence. Could theories be proven false? Of course. But is there evidence supporting them? Yes.

  • @werebee ""you ignorant fuck"" The redshift of starlight is usually interpreted as a Doppler effect(b);that is, stars and galaxies are moving away from Earth,stretching out(or reddening)the wavelengths of light they emit.Space itself supposedly expands-so the total potential energy of stars, galaxies,and other matter increases today with no corresponding loss of energy elsewhere(c).Thus,the big bang violates the law of conservation of energy, probably the most important of all physical laws.