MORPH1NG_homage to Joseph Beuys

[klastiaan]

Impressive concept.

[comradenash]

I think it would be a mistake to believe that gazing at a video screen is any substitute for the power of the imagery within the human mind, were a person to undertake such a meditation. What's lacking here is the difficulty and self-directed discipline inherent in holding these images in one's mind. Furthermore, to transform the image in a manner that accords with your insights and perceptions is to deprive others of their own inner experience.

[klastiaan]

I guess I agree.

I think meditation is more about the ability of holding focus, than the subject/object of focus itself.

Important here seems the subject, which would be (just) another object, clung onto by you of some part of you.

Judging the sounds and image(s), this must be something...

[morgantuffs]

PART 5! Now imagine that face morphing again against the backdrop of a symbol of your choice.

What becomes of this symbol-face during the film and after the animation has run its course in comparison with the background it has at present?? Or a white background?

[morgantuffs]

PAR 4! For anyone that thought the film was damn cool but missed the connection with what I was saying:

Consider the cross directly behind the face. If you don´t feel it is a cross or it is in actuality something else, then consider how the morphing would look with just a white background.

[morgantuffs]

PART 3! Forgive me the maker/uploader of this animation if I have just presumed that you and I have the same frame of reference. Perhaps it is not wholy important, anyway.

If that be the case then it will be damned funny to read for you, at least.

[morgantuffs]

PART2! Why have I never seen a film with complicated relationships depicted, where appropriate, through the shifts in the computer generated auras of its main characters?Because I have not lived long enough. It has not been done yet (correct me please if you know differently). But it will become prevalant in my lifetime, and this astonishing youtube animation is the only example I have ever seen until now of the power of the unseen being used in such an an intentional and direct way on film.

[morgantuffs]

~~~~~break~~~~~

from long post....

[morgantuffs]

CONGRATULATIONS on an amazing

ahievement. I was easy to win over in the respect that I have long been fascinated by the idea of supersensible realities being translated in their purely visual aspects to film. (You see that I like Steiner). I am convinced that the astonishing imaging techniques that we are close to mastering in our present day (will) have (even more) real value when they are eventually turned to depicting subtle realms.

[klastiaan]

In other words, technology will transcend our realities?

[monasman]

Transcend the reality of the purely sense world? There are some amazing possibilities here... The medium of film involves image and sound, so it is tied to the sense world in what intrinsically. Through story and image film also manipulates the soul, the inner experiences of the viewer.  To depict in film the vast and colourful world underlying the physical as seen by the clairvoyant has only recently become possibl.

[monasman]

I believe this will happen soon, and there is a reason it has not yet. A depiction it can only be, for the innerness of those subtler realms cannot be portrayed - this gap the viewer will fill in himself when he realises what he's seeing. Changes in points of view of filmakers have often equaled shifts in consciousness of the public. Television screens can be used for contemplative meditation extremely effectively. This ground has not yet been trodden by filmmakers.

[FrankPorland]

holy shit i hardly noticed the transition until he got a beard