Added: 7 months ago
From: machinima
Views: 2,756,183
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12,039)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Come on... Old people say the 1951 one The Thing is better than the 1982 The Thing, now people who like the 1982 one say the 2011 one is shit. Jesus christ they're all the same story in different chapters.

  • Just put a review of this movie up. It was ok but not as good as the original in my opinion.

  • Well, my bad. It's a prequel of the original movie, but still the scary part was awesome.

    I know the "romance scene" added in this movie ruined it up, I don't really like it too.

    I just enjoyed being scared of the disturbing parts.

  • I was born in 90's, and actually haven't watch the original "The Thing"... but after seeing this [by bought the cheap unoriginal DVD] the movie was pretty good, in my opinion. They did pretty awesome effect on that disturbing creature...

    I don't really care about other "remake" movies, since most of them are ruined and lame, so much gore and bloody scene compared to "horror".

  • Omfg im sick of this shit, people complain that remake of the oldest the thing movie is way too different to the original, now there complaining that this movie too similar to to the remake, its the best ur gona get just stfu and enjoy the movie.. if u cant live with that, id like to see u make a better movie -.- Fags

  • best film, just uploaded movie here bit.ly\x8opnS

  • The Thing from 1982 is way better. If you like the new one more you are not an 80s kid. I fucking hate kids these days.

  • I liked first movie the most

  • haha, i thought this story was about the thing from the fantastic four..

  • i personally think that the prequel was better than the 1982 movie and i am sick of people calling the prequel a shit movie do we all forget that the 1982 movie did poorly as well at the box office and look at the cult following that has gained, and off course it follows the same plot of the origional because it is a prequel you fucking idiot and for the lack of climax did you even watch the movie you idiot, it is people like you who ruin the reputation of movies you fucking idiot.

  • You're too young to understand.

  • Such an unnecessary prequel. It has some little change of facts, but the context of the events in the norwegian camp is the same of which happens in the american.

    It's quite the same plot of the original remake, but with empty and apathetic characters, random mutations, a lack of climax, amateur acts and cheap effects.

  • Is this a prequel or a prequel with the same scenes from the John Carpenter version? Not getting this...

  • i don't like the acting and dialogue in modern films it's more like scooby doo than horror, just watch the original with kurt russell that was amazing

  • This movie sucks. I don't like all cast. Very poor. Original was far much better.

  • , it's rated restricted and still I watched it, it was awesome

  • bit.ly\zPTE4w

    

  • is the movie worth it to buy?

  • @33phobia

    dont buy

    torrent please

  • great movie, must see!

  • this version is such a horrible piece of shit

  • Best version is the 1951 original from howard Hawks. In this they change the Main character for female. Al Bundy Would say no mam :-)

  • Gledao sam i staru i novu verziju.Ne mogu da se uporede.Stara verzija mnogo bolja,a nova verzija je dosta losha,previse specijalnih efekata itd.

  • kako se u mnogim holivudskim filmovima uvek neshto deshava u neku jebenu zabit a retko kad u neku metropolu.

  • i can't believe they were making another version of this CLASSIC horror movies and hadn't even INFORMED us about it!?!??!?!?!!?!!?!? -.-

  • looks like horrible acting

    

  • If youve seen the original, this movies ending, in the credits, is the most badass thing ever.

  • Once again a great movie is ruined by CGI. Old school is the best!!!

  • there are some norwegian actors in this movie :)

  • The american way of saying 'Antarctica' is fucking retarded. 'Anartica'

  • WTF ..JUST LIKE PREDATOR VS ALIEN

  • @Meyo33129 it u watch the original thing, the first scene is two Norwegian people chasing a dog through the snow. The dog finds another group of people. This new group of people dont know the dog is 'the thing' so they protect it because the Norwegians are trying to kill it. The dog then goes with the new group of people into their camp. The new thing movie is set before the original and it's last ending scene is the dog running away from the Norwegian camp with two guys chasing it...

  • i loved that THING with the two faces good movie

  • "Hey guys, there's like a lake of blood over here so i think that somebody might have been attacked"........ EPIC

  • this was a really good movie!

  • I watched the black and white version and it had this Frankenstein's Monster thing terrorizing everyone. A fav part is when the electric blanket defrosts the thing and it escapes. :D

  • If u guys didn't know, this is actually a prequel

  • @thelonious1111 ok someone told me this and i was confused since i never seen the 1986 version cuz i have no access to it. could you explain?

  • this movie was an epic fail. glad i didn't waste my money. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • So. Instead Of Kurt Russel, They got a Woman to play the main.. Nuff Said, Film's Shit

  • @JSh2206 I Agree. also Carpenter deliberately didn't want any women in the original film so the remake fucked that up too.

  • i want dawn of the dead 2 !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • 1:29 to 2:27 is freakin' awesome!

  • this movie was so well executed. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • why is ramona in alaska?

  • @daftcazar

    because scott is with knives like he's supposed to.

  • I don't really care what critics say, or opinions. This movie was well played out in theaters. IUt carries the legend of the cult classic and keeps me curious as to what they might have in store for our favorite body snatcher villian. The cast was old school style and the switch up moment of action kept it as an intense feeling, only flaw is that once the mystery was revealed everyone started to *finger snaps* one after the other. Elizabeth is beautiful and played the part well. Boom boom...boom

  • Aw crap, they've already ruined it. Im not being sexist but why did they put a girl in it? i mean on the original one they had no romance or car chase or any of that bullcrap :(

  • @MentalSpartan its not a remake its a prequal

  • @k1ngsubscriber oh really? ok that makes sense now. thanks.

  • @MentalSpartan There's no romance or car chases in this one either.

  • superb movie. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • lake

  • the ending was the beginning of the thing fom 82 and i fucking loved it :))

  • Ok ... before seeing this movie, watch the original movie (The Thing from another world - 1951), then The Thing (1982). Then play the Playstation 2 game, then you will understand many things.

  • @lepumpernic1 Fair warning though, the 1951 movie took a LOT of creative freedoms. So do yourself a favor and follow this user's advice BUT before you watch any of the movies, read "Who Goes There?" The story that inspired all of the movies and which the John Carpenter film stays loyal to the most.

  • good movie.  goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • I don't know about you guys, but I think the main girl is HOT.

  • I loved the ending to this great movie.

  • this was such an amazing movie. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • Seeing the discovery of a huge unidentified disc-shaped object the size of a Jumbo jet at the bottom of the Baltic Sea by a Swedish team (who search for rare artifacts) in the news recently, brought this movie to mind. Look for 'UFO found in Baltic Sea' here on youTube. Interesting, and not a movie!

  • @JoeSzilagy the one were the russian scientists are drilling into a river in the antartic that hasn't been touched in over 20 million yrs brought me here

  • good movie.  goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • Jesus there's lots of trolls under me

  • this was such a wonderful movie.  goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • The Thing (1982 ) ; was a remake of "The Thing from Another World " (1951) .

  • @cactus9889 Both movies are based on a story called "Who Goes There" however the 1982 film stuck to the original story much more closely, which technically moves it away from being a "remake"

  • good movie. actually one of the best i've seen in awhile. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • I add another opinion in support of this movie. Yes Carpenter's "The Thing" is one the BEST horror movies of all time, but this one is very good as well.  It comes out on BD tomorrow, I plan to buy it tomorrow. IMHO, the only horror movies I like as good as these two are Descent 1&2.

  • @963852art

    You don't like Exorcist or Halloween? Granted Halloween is a slasher which those movies make psychos more creative...so does Forensic Files.

  • it sounds like a zenomorph

  • @YummyBear37 Xenomorph"

  • this was such a wonderful movie.  goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • THE DITTO IS BETTER

  • Its a good movie only if you enjoy monster kind of movies...otherwise that thing is a crap.

  • i don't know why there are so many remakes now cant they come up anything by the self's anymore? but im willing to give this movie a try

  • @blackheart0478 its not a remake xL its a prequel

  • @OrionGameStudios WHY THE HELL WOULD WE NEED A PREQUEL!!!??? there already is the thing before john carpenters and he even showed it in his movie

  • @blackheart0478 now we know what happened with the splitface and how the camp burned down and stuff. where the thing came from.

  • MY COMMENTS TAKE UP THE ENTIRE PAGE GO TO PAGE 2 PLEASE IM INSANE LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO­OOOO

  • best movie of the year in my opinion. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • best movie of the year in my opinion. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • No way in hell am i watching this... The 1982 movie was narliest most disgusting movie that i have ever seen. This 2011 version is probably even more disturbing.

  • they didnt need to make a new one.

    the original was great, john carpenter's remake argubly better (personally i like the john carpenter's version the best)

    im going to go watch this movie and i swear to god if i see one crappy cgi sequence in it anywhere im going to flip the fuck out.

  • @HeySaintPeter

    well its not gunna b a remake but thars bein cgi in it so just complain uselessly now to save ya truble

  • this movie was so epic. goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • this master's student is supposed to be the "columbia paleontology" they call???

  • me personally im all for remakes or reboots, if you don't like them you always can go back to the original, these remakes don't hurt the original's one bit

  • @mduering81

    well thats completely unrelated cuz its a PREQUAL

  • @TheGodzillTroll have you seen the movie, it might be a prequel, notice that i spelled it right, it's pretty close to the original, its just another crew trying to figure out what the hell it is while it kills almost everybody like in the original

  • @mduering81

    honestly i dont care how i spelled it and yes it may be close but i am acting as a messenger to the people who are ignorant that this movie was set chronologically beforehand of the one with Kurt Russel. And yes I went to the theatre with my bud n watched it.

  • this movie fits the first perfectly it even had the axe in the wall in it omg!!!! 4 out of 5 felt kinda the same wich you really cant help but they did good! they need to make this into a game or somthin i think people just dont like new things but this is actully a good movie i thought it was gonna be the first one all over again i was like fa... but nope you should watch it! :)

  • @TheFunnyscool they did make a game of it, only they made a game of john carpenter's version

  • i hate when the trailer summarizes the entire movie for you in 1 minute.  goto:

    watchmoviesforfreeonline[dot]n­et

  • @postwvbfv

    I hate when trolls like you spam videos posting sites just for attention. Go to: watchtrollssufferforfree[dot]c­om

  • @snake2006 Yes, this movie cannot beat the movies that are made by Carpenter... Plus I said it's actually A good movie, it's not the best nor is it the worst. So please shut the fuck up.

  • @alyssa6477

    you forget that the first one was made 30 years ago, so a different time with different technology. At the time, the thing scared the hell out of everyone, and it was one of the best movies of that time.

  • @3DPeter I enjoyed both of them. HOpe to see more of this creature and scifi paranoia of mystery among us.

  • @snake2006 You're a dumbass! Please Please PLEASE read what you just wrote. You just said that how this movie is a piece of "monkey shit" you're saying how it's bad, but then after you said "no monkey shit is better than this movie" so technically is human wordings you're saying how this movie is better than thise bad ones. Idiot Period!

  • Prequel, mother-hubbards. Prequel.

  • It's actually a good movie

  • @alyssa6477

    No it's not. It's a piece of monkey shit. No monkey shit is better than this.

    It doesn't match up to Carpenter's film at all, and anyone who says otherwise is lying and I CAN PROVE IT.

  • @snake2006 Yes, please try to prove an opinion. This should serve amusing.

    

  • @CBSquall To be Amusing*

  • @CBSquall

    It doesn't match up. The splitface in the 82 film had 1 set of organs, yet in this movie it should have 2.

    The kerosene cans next to splitface in the 82 film are missing.

    The ice cave is never existed in the 82 film, the director of this movie admitted that he changed this.

    The dog looks nothing like the 82 dog.

    The dog goes from brown when it jumps out of the window to grey when running in the snow.

    I can name tons of places where they don't match up