Added: 3 years ago
From: overclockerfx
Views: 2,001
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Try more. I am oced my friend E2160 to 3.5GHz on AC Freezer 64,Goodram memory,gigabyte ga-ep41-ds3l

  • Celeron 430 @ 3.2 = 18 seconds

    Celeron 440 @ 3.0 = 20 seconds :)

  • yea you wanna show me some proof? and what memory and memory speed?

  • Print screen and i belive.

  • my celeron 430 produces 24 seconds at 3.3Ghz, with only 512KB cache and 2GB single channel memory. im sure if i overclock further ill get a even better result of beating 20 seconds

  • allright... you still have to understand that super pi is not much of meter for showing the differences between single core processors and dual-cores since when i run it it only uses 50% of my cpu. also its alot about memory speed and timings. since im running my memory at stock except for the timings...

  • lol with my e6600 only on 3ghz i get 17 secunds

  • yea sure lol... are you aware of how much cache the e2160 has ; 1MB and the E6600 has what ???? 4x that 4MB which makes for a better super pi score....

  • it has nothing to with the mb chache q6600 has 8mb but he still gets the same score as e6600

  • well that might be because super pi is only able to utilise one processor core so it does not make that much of a difference beteween dual and quad-core

  • q6600 is essentially TWO e6600's, so therefor 2 x 4MB caches...

  • E2160 @ 3.3ghz, team elite 2x1gb 800

    18seg 1M

  • whats your motherboard?

  • my mb is: ASUS P5K-SE

  • yea my P5N-E SLI is a little flimsy since its got a nvidia northbridge but it overclocks well

  • Nice time!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more