Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
falsely claiming to be the owner of allegedly infringing material is not a crime under the dmca.
MemeCrusher 1 year ago
"falsely claiming to be the owner of allegedly infringing material is not a crime under the dmca."
Oh right, so then VenomFangX didn't actually need to apologize to the internet for maliciously abusing the system and the other people he filed against didn't actually have any legal recourse?
Lie like that again and you will be blocked. I'm not going to waste my time with fools on my own channels.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
@ThatOneQuestion i am giving it to you straight up. see 17usc512f. the penalty for filing an improper dmca notice filed by a content owner is civil not criminal. criminal penalties do apply to false counter notices (see and compare 512gc3), but the notice itself is not filed under penalty of perjury. vfx's prob was he encouraged others to file false claims. a whole nother kettle of fish. no lies here. get it right.
MemeCrusher 1 year ago
Oh so you dont think someone claiming they have legally binding rights to something they dont isn't a crime?
Try actually thinking, idiot.
DMCA claims are about copyright, and abusing that to censor people is blatantly lying in order to censor.
Do you think ANY judge will ever be just fine with someone saying perjury is not a problem? Nice try again, but you fail.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
And by the way, you fucking idiot, get your damn facts straight.
17 usc 512 C 3 A vi
"A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. "
Do not speak about this again, kid.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
@MemeCrusher
And since you pressed the issue and made me find the specific line in the law that indeed proves it is a crime, I'll add that to my intro.
Thanks.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThatOneQuestion dear idiot as i said when the OWNER of the material in question files a dmca, it is not under penalty of perjury - it is when someone acts on behalf of the owner it is under penalty of perjury. can you read english?
" and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner" idiot.
MemeCrusher 1 year ago
@MemeCrusher the penalty not perjury, it is simply that damages are owed, see 512 f and stfu idiot!
MemeCrusher 1 year ago
You were already told not to bother speaking on this after your humiliation 3 weeks ago. You are blocked.
.
Why you have this stick up your ass about your own inability to understand law I dont know. Keep your bullshit to yourself, especially if you dont know what you are talking about.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
Why are there no instructions on how to withdraw a DMCA?
Youtube makes it easy to file one, but imposible to locate it, or the progress of it, or anything about it, especially if you want to withdraw it, WTF is that about?
TheTruthPusher 1 year ago
Awesome just fucking awesome.
Cheers Christine
christinepeace 1 year ago
How about, instead, we pray to his God to "take him home"
Y'know....like the next time Geerup goes off on an incoherent, frothing tirade, Yahweh can make Geerup's shrivelled little "heart" finally blow a gasket!
LordCustos3 1 year ago 2
Hey! I like it!!
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago
@ThatOneQuestion
Consider it a thank you for the "Geerup must've felt guilty" comment from yesterday that inspired 15 solid minutes of joy-filled laughter in me.
LordCustos3 1 year ago
"Consider it a thank you for the "Geerup must've felt guilty""
My pleasure!
I felt pretty foolish after I posted that, though... I didn't really "know" him yet.
Oh, and especially after Disabledchicken's video... wow.
ThatOneQuestion 1 year ago