Poppycock! I like that they don't say that the study also found negligible exposure at 6 feet. And instantaneous exposure at high levels is not the same as chronic exposure all the time to outdoor pollution from cars and power plants, etc. If instantaneous exposure mattered then no one would be getting Xrays at the doctor or dentist.
All the studies ever done into ETS pooled together show no significant risk from second hand smoke, and we must remember that most of these studies have a bias to finding risk, it is a pity that these studies do not have to reach a relative risk ratio of 3 before anything can be declared harmful..
Social engineering is never a good political tool and those who use this medium I hope will be held to account.
Good day to all of my fellow Christians, firstly my apology for being out of topic. I came here to remind you people that the judgment day has started already. Please depart from cursing, smoking, gambling, fornication, occultism, and for watching pornography etc. lest you be found not worthy to inter the kingdom of God in the Day of Execution.
Aww you were so self conscience about your comment you removed it.
Being homosexual means nothing in this conversation, nor does the ukulele have any reflection upon one's sexual orientation or intelligence. However, stating that second hand smoke is a lie, is downright retardation.
Don't play off your "TOBACCO ISN'T DANGEROUS" comment as a joke. If it were, you wouldn't have the self-consciousness to delete it. lolololololololololololol
seems like more than you have. get an education, seriously. you are so self-conscious that you actually deleted your comment in fears of being further made fun of, or you knew you were blatenly wrong. fail sir.
Well, sorry, but wether there is conclusive proof or not, Smokers do not thave the right to gamble with the lives of others who do not consent to breathing in their smoke. If i was to put a smoker in a shooting range and stand him next to the target, would he stand there while i shoot at it? even though i'm a good aim, he probably would not, because there is a chance i could be wrong and someone could die.
darkreaper2828 - Have a look at the section on Passive smoking on the website 'Velvet Glove Iron Fist' There are loads of studies quoted and explained on there.
This is ridiculous. This is not a "study" but a propaganda piece.Inhaling 50x the particulate matter in second hand smoke SOUNDS scary but he never mentions actual morbidity or mortality figures. Using his measuring tools, he could just as well stand on a roadside and measure high numbers. Another scare tactic. Use your white matter people!
@jcomd The general mortality count associated with active smoking and secondhand smoke I gather comes not from any real science, but rather hand picked statistics.
Not one person has died of SHS, Not one legal case in the UK has been successful in linking SHS with mortality. Most studies on SHS have shown no adverse effect (6 to 1) - some even a beneficial effect, The 'passive smoking kills' soundbite is political propaganda - not a health statement. It is purely a means to justify smoking bans. It is lies!! Check out the studies.
And its their choice to smoke and decrease their energy, youthful looks, white teeth and lifespan. NOt the government or anybody elses. This is america, and if you want to smoke, you should be entitled to it.
Poppycock! I like that they don't say that the study also found negligible exposure at 6 feet. And instantaneous exposure at high levels is not the same as chronic exposure all the time to outdoor pollution from cars and power plants, etc. If instantaneous exposure mattered then no one would be getting Xrays at the doctor or dentist.
brbubba 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All the studies ever done into ETS pooled together show no significant risk from second hand smoke, and we must remember that most of these studies have a bias to finding risk, it is a pity that these studies do not have to reach a relative risk ratio of 3 before anything can be declared harmful..
Social engineering is never a good political tool and those who use this medium I hope will be held to account.
socketgreg 1 year ago
1:14 "The closer you are to the smoke, the larger amount of inhalation." WOW! What a novel finding! lmfao
SaxonBrit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
Good day to all of my fellow Christians, firstly my apology for being out of topic. I came here to remind you people that the judgment day has started already. Please depart from cursing, smoking, gambling, fornication, occultism, and for watching pornography etc. lest you be found not worthy to inter the kingdom of God in the Day of Execution.
.
conceil8 2 years ago
Comment removed
nunurox 3 years ago
You are retarded.
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
yes and faviroting Man Plays Ukulele naked is gay
nunurox 2 years ago
Aww you were so self conscience about your comment you removed it.
Being homosexual means nothing in this conversation, nor does the ukulele have any reflection upon one's sexual orientation or intelligence. However, stating that second hand smoke is a lie, is downright retardation.
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
sorry i didnt know you were gay..... have fun cum guzzler it must be alot healthier for you than smoking cigs
nunurox 2 years ago
Although I am not homosexual and have no prejudice against such a sexual orientation, it actually is. Smoking tobacco = over 4,000 toxic chemicals.
Semen = Fructose sugar; Water; Citric acid; Vitamin C; Enzymes; Protein; and Zinc.
Can it enrich a poor diet? Not unless your drinking gallons of it.
You should definitely school yourself.
"THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US ABOUT THE DANGERS OF TOBACCO"
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
Anyway, it's glad to know you've realized your unintelligence so much that you corrected your mistake by deleting that comment. Lulz.
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
im very proud you know so much about Semen
you should be very proud of yourself too
you really know how to take shit seriously..... im surprised you didnt use the "yes im gay I am very happy" excuse
nunurox 2 years ago
Don't play off your "TOBACCO ISN'T DANGEROUS" comment as a joke. If it were, you wouldn't have the self-consciousness to delete it. lolololololololololololol
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
hey get out of here no one likes you
all you do is start shit with people..... go read a book or something and leave youtube for a while
and im not gonna even reply to anything you anymore
BLOCKED
nunurox 2 years ago
actually that guy does have a point. you really did sound stupid when you said the government was lying about tobacco being dangerous.
srsbsnsmanlulz 2 years ago
wow you have one freind congratz
nunurox 2 years ago
seems like more than you have. get an education, seriously. you are so self-conscious that you actually deleted your comment in fears of being further made fun of, or you knew you were blatenly wrong. fail sir.
lolbuthurtmuch4 2 years ago
And thus, I win.
StefanIsAThief 2 years ago
i dont think anyone here likes you.
do yourself a favor, man and get an education. tobacco kills brah.
lolbutthurtmuch 2 years ago
Well, sorry, but wether there is conclusive proof or not, Smokers do not thave the right to gamble with the lives of others who do not consent to breathing in their smoke. If i was to put a smoker in a shooting range and stand him next to the target, would he stand there while i shoot at it? even though i'm a good aim, he probably would not, because there is a chance i could be wrong and someone could die.
mikecro1111 3 years ago
GO SOMEWHERE ELSE TO SMOKE SMOKERS
trast101 3 years ago
darkreaper2828 - Have a look at the section on Passive smoking on the website 'Velvet Glove Iron Fist' There are loads of studies quoted and explained on there.
PS my previous post was in reply to 'Areweonfiya'
kindog101 3 years ago
This is ridiculous. This is not a "study" but a propaganda piece.Inhaling 50x the particulate matter in second hand smoke SOUNDS scary but he never mentions actual morbidity or mortality figures. Using his measuring tools, he could just as well stand on a roadside and measure high numbers. Another scare tactic. Use your white matter people!
jcomd 3 years ago 6
@jcomd The general mortality count associated with active smoking and secondhand smoke I gather comes not from any real science, but rather hand picked statistics.
SaxonBrit 1 year ago
Great study, but this video could have presented the information in a little better order.
DanielTHollander 3 years ago
the antis are well intentioned.
tobacco pays large amoutns of taxes, the antis dont gain anything from this.
why would they lie?
hunterkillr 3 years ago
Theat should read: takes.
VS120sfan 3 years ago
More B.S.
The antis falsely claim that each cigarette smoked taked 14 minutes off of the life of a smoker.
If that were true, no smoker would live past 50 years of age.
The average smoker will die 3-6 years sooner, than the average non-smoker.
That's a fact.
VS120sfan 3 years ago
Tobacco smoke contains some toxic particles - so does car exhaust fumes, factory emissions plus many, many, everyday products.
BUT are they bad for your health?
Warfarin is a medication given to tens of thousands of angina sufferers - Warfarin is better known as RAT POISON. Is this bad for health.
Tens of thousands of people all over the world are injected with 'live' vaccines for any number of deadly diseases. Are these bad for health?
Read between the lines, this is pure propaganda!
kindog101 3 years ago
You're absolutely right. Smoking cigarettes will make you healthy and strong.
-_-
And those live vaccines, they are weakened or dead viruses injected into us so that our body could easily kill and become immune to.
Areweonfiya 3 years ago
Same principle with SHS!
Not one person has died of SHS, Not one legal case in the UK has been successful in linking SHS with mortality. Most studies on SHS have shown no adverse effect (6 to 1) - some even a beneficial effect, The 'passive smoking kills' soundbite is political propaganda - not a health statement. It is purely a means to justify smoking bans. It is lies!! Check out the studies.
kindog101 3 years ago
Do you have a link for the beneficial effect portion?
knight508 3 years ago
Tobacco smoke contains some toxic particles - so does car exhaust fumes, factory emissions plus many, many, everyday products.
BUT are they bad for your health?
Warfarin is a medication given to tens of thousands of angina sufferers - Warfarin is better known as RAT POISON. Is this bad for health.
Tens of thousands of people all over the world are injected with 'live' vaccines for any number of deadly diseases. Are these bad for health?
Read between the lines! This is pure propaganda!
kindog101 3 years ago
"it has long been claimed that SHS is bad for your health".
I knew a man who 'claimed' that the world would end on march 7th 1999 - it didnt happen!
Anyone can 'claim' anything they like but without 'proof' that claim is useless!
kindog101 3 years ago
fucking smokers fucking up our air and world
that is probaly gonna be the end of mankind lol
Xgloomshadow 4 years ago
It's a bunch of bullshit
EmoApple44 4 years ago
Pure garbage!
VS120sfan 4 years ago 3
VS120sfan
shut the fuck up dude
it ant garbage
your just scared as shit because you smoke that bullshit
did you know that smokers loose 16 years of there life?
Xgloomshadow 4 years ago
seeing that you know smokers will lose 16
years of there life could you please tell me in what year i am going to die
I am 35 now
jpsks 4 years ago
well when did you start smoking?
Xgloomshadow 4 years ago
if you started at the age of 35 you will roghly die at the age of 50-60
as most smokers are known for dieing in there 50s
and im not fucking joking i know im gonna get thumbs down
Xgloomshadow 4 years ago
And its their choice to smoke and decrease their energy, youthful looks, white teeth and lifespan. NOt the government or anybody elses. This is america, and if you want to smoke, you should be entitled to it.
benjamaiLL 4 years ago