are you a retard? first title is fucked... second what the fuck. your simulator is max up. bad landing... worst graphics i ever saw in my life. third the camera view... you should show us at the side angel. but o wel u wnt know what im saying coz you are FUCKING retarded.. i feel sorry for you
are you a retard? first title is fucked... second what the fuck. your simulator is max up. bad landing... worst graphics i ever saw in my life. third the camera view... you should show us at the side angel. but o wel u wnt know what im saying coz you are FUCKING retarded.. i feel sorry for you
Stop saying "this is impossible", "very unrealistic" give me a break if you're going to give negative comments why the hell do you even bother to click on a video that says "carrier landing in space shuttle".
In October 1963, during moderately rough seas, Lt. James H. Flatley III USN landed a KC-130F Hercules re-fueler with a normal landing weight of 130000 pounds on the deck of U.S.S. Forrestal (CVA-59). The mission, to determine if the C-130 could be used as a "Super COD" aircraft. An L.S.O. named Daugherty gave Flatley an engine "chop" while still three or four feet off the deck. There were several landings and take-offs. The rest as they say is history.
In terms of mass and glide speed the space shuttle isn't so outrageously off from typical navalized fighter aircraft that the scenario is unthinkable. No doubt a quick thinking air officer could jury rig something that would give the shuttle at least a fighting chance.
That said, if a real life landing went anywhere near as well as this one, it would be a minor miracle. Nice flying!
I play both X-Plane and MS FSX. And I know difficulties of landing on a moving carrier. But man, what a rouch, hard and fast landing?! Video is good and landing is not so good. Cheers.
@axe1203 Guys I know you think this was a terrible landing and all, but here's a few things to consider:
1. I was flying this with no HUD. No way to track my elevation changes. Now way to track my airspeed or vertical decent rate. No way to flare appropriately or level out at the right altitude. I was flying pretty much exclusively with an outside view of the shuttle, which is very hard in a limited control situation such as a landing.
@axe1203 2.The only time I used an inside view was when I released the chute which they use anyway whenever the shuttle lands. The shuttle has several miles to stop normally, but I did it in under 100 meters. The lowest speed the shuttle can maneuver is 150 knots. Any lower and you face stall and inability to correct your course.
@MrTrains1 You're an idiot. The space shuttle is not designed to stop in that short a distance. Nor is it designed to fly that slow. It lands at like 250 knots.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
...make that 195 knots, at an approach angle nine times that of an airliner (I don't know what naval aviation does). It usually needs a tad over 2.5 miles of landing space; I doubt it could possibly land on an aircraft carrier.
@lnternetBully: I assume your comment was aimed at the video in general. The whole concept was amusing in a fantastic sort of way, sort of like the video of the shuttle landing in downtown Cape Town, SA.
@puncheex Hey, I'll bet it could land on a carrier. It would land and keep right on going off the other end. All 3 arrester cables and a bunch of safety nets wouldn't stop that big ol' flying brick yard. ;-) Cool and interesting video and concept though!
@Traxxasman11: No, they do fine in space, but near the ground they wouldn't sustain the shuttle at all. They are about an order of magnitude too small to sustain level flight.
i live right next to one of the space shuttles alternate landing sites (chennault int airport lake charles louisiana) and the runway is only 2 miles long so yeah it dont need 2.5 miles stop
@puncheex sure you could.... with.. like, uhm... a carrier doing 195 knots :P Man, you could even hover to your ramp position on the deck, how cool would that be!
@puncheex The navy does about 150-160 knots, it would possibly sink the carrier if ever even got on to the carrier in the first place. One shuttle weighs about 200,000 pounds, without any cargo or fuel or people, That is like 50 f-18s, more than half of any supercarrier's complement of aircraft. WITH all of a shuttle's cargo and equipment, I'd say it would have about 1/6th the mass of the entire carrier, which is A LOT.
@TheNewCW: Oh, I agree it would be a major thing, but your mass figures are way off. The shuttle weighs a little over 2000 tons (4 million lbs). A Nimitz class carrier weighs in (or displaces, the naval term) 100,000 tons. The shuttle won't roll it, but it would make waves, as they say. Your average naval fighter, say a loaded F-18, runs about 30 tons.
LSO report: Little low flat start, little fly through up in the middle, not enough power in the come down in close, fast the ramp. Spotting the Deck ! No grade 3 wire.
the pixsels at you computer is bigger than minecraft!
Airmannen 1 month ago
the title is backwards...
gullett1966 2 months ago 2
Which version of X-Plane is this? :) Nicely done btw!
OneSkiWonder 3 months ago
Dude, that was'nt exactly a soft glider plane landing!^^
Kevinski1997 3 months ago
this is x-plane
FunExperiments4Kidz 3 months ago
wtf man, you would've died for g-force excess
BadNiedernauer 4 months ago
use Orbiter sim if u want to sim space shuttle!!!
TheNitroWarroir 5 months ago
you would have to be out of your mind to do something like that in real life
p51mustang19 5 months ago
what is this called, can you acually go into space, and can i get this on my computer? please answer fast
GlitchingEnterprise 5 months ago
whats that game called?
94picaso 5 months ago
@94picaso X-Plane
FunExperiments4Kidz 3 months ago
damn you can land anything on a carrier these days....
robloxflightsim777 7 months ago
@robloxflightsim777 true true i landed a saturnv rocket on a carrier :D
Taylorh161 5 months ago
This thing could be called anti-simulation;-)
PawelK198604 7 months ago
TEH EPIC VIDEO IS COMING!!!
SuperTechno123 7 months ago
Congratulations! You just fractured the spine of every astronaut in that ship!
gixzo 7 months ago 14
@gixzo more like broken!
DreadTRex 7 months ago
I don't think this is possible. This thing weighs almost 10 times more than an F/A-18. Lol
JgWerd 7 months ago
Epic title!!! LOL
macaijiahami90202030 7 months ago
Seems legit.
nitestryker7 7 months ago
ehh, the title says "Carrier Landing IN Space Shuttle"
EpicWafflezXD 7 months ago
@EpicWafflezXD lol yeah that would be a lot more interesting to see.
joshig1983 7 months ago
try it with the crash detection back on ans then repost.....bet you get a slightly different outcome.
beergut111 7 months ago
can you send me the airplane? for download?
TheJulibord 7 months ago
well done on that landing
terawattz 7 months ago
what flight sim is this on?
daMilkking 7 months ago
@daMilkking x-plane
MinecraftMovies4u 7 months ago
now lets you take off
leekimlanuza 8 months ago
Launch that fucker back up
wotcherme 8 months ago
lol their gps screwed up and they have to land on carrier
ChasterProductions 8 months ago
What does it matter !!!! its just some fun.. i liked it :-)
Soothgiven 8 months ago
lets hope the astronauts didn't want to have kids..
ozzey1137 8 months ago
Yeahh dude ! like a Hornet /Tomcat jajjajajajajjaja !
TheMrRaNk1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
are you a retard? first title is fucked... second what the fuck. your simulator is max up. bad landing... worst graphics i ever saw in my life. third the camera view... you should show us at the side angel. but o wel u wnt know what im saying coz you are FUCKING retarded.. i feel sorry for you
holokhang991 8 months ago
Comment removed
holokhang991 8 months ago
are you a retard? first title is fucked... second what the fuck. your simulator is max up. bad landing... worst graphics i ever saw in my life. third the camera view... you should show us at the side angel. but o wel u wnt know what im saying coz you are FUCKING retarded.. i feel sorry for you
holokhang991 8 months ago
Carrier landing in space shuttle? Or Space Shuttle Carrier landing?
yan3321 8 months ago
do you have to pay to download.please can you tell me where you download it from???PLEASE REPLY.nice quality of image
parisTDR250 8 months ago
And a drift!!!
Ps: Look at left wing when it's landing.
cejanek 8 months ago
Comment removed
cejanek 8 months ago
Comment removed
cejanek 8 months ago
thumbs up!
MrCasspir 9 months ago
@MrCasspir for you not the video
holokhang991 8 months ago
@holokhang991 did not get your reply. what was that ?
MrCasspir 8 months ago
Chuck Norris behind the wheel?
Jesteria78 9 months ago
@Jesteria78 Chuck Eager
MrCasspir 9 months ago
@Jesteria78 of cause man :)
holokhang991 8 months ago
I imagine the carrier'd have to re-ballast awful quickly to accomodate the weight. That was fun to watch-thanks
Blackrain4xmas 9 months ago
Haha, that was rough on the undercarriage.
karadan100 9 months ago
unrealistic..true.. but I like that this fictional simulator. :D
KIBProductionz 9 months ago
I lold when I saw it was X-plane.
Armigo91 9 months ago
Stop saying "this is impossible", "very unrealistic" give me a break if you're going to give negative comments why the hell do you even bother to click on a video that says "carrier landing in space shuttle".
Shortyguy94 9 months ago
whats the game called
loganwyt 10 months ago
pfffff this is impossible...
olivier191001 10 months ago
see how the tire smoke blew back like that? there was a huge headwind
exkuhpid 10 months ago
what game is this
cardman2130 10 months ago
FSX? Or what game?
VladimirSR2 10 months ago
@VladimirSR2 thats the worst game ever - x plane SuCkZ Ballz
skillerboy3 10 months ago
@skillerboy3 x-plane sucks? wow!
VladimirSR2 10 months ago
That shit was too funny.......
TamakoAkai 10 months ago
can you provide a link to this
awes141 11 months ago
good thing the carrier can carry a space shuttle that suddenly release the parachute
nikkodino10 11 months ago
I'd be haulin ass to get out of that thing before it rolled of the side
FORWARDxUNTOxAWESOME 11 months ago
Oh yeah? Now catapoult that thing back in the air.
mrxalvhp 1 year ago 36
.....ok *uses a catapault to launch shuttle into air*
starcraftman1000 8 months ago
@mrxalvhp Thats gonna take ALOT of rubber bands, and possibly ALOT of band aids.
PayneProdutions 8 months ago
@mrxalvhp You kinda need FUEL to do that the space shuttle dosen't have fuel only engines
Daniel55556 5 months ago
send this to nasa :-) they will appreciate
SuperBublifuk 1 year ago
"To landing sequence"
thatguyontheright1 1 year ago
"whooaaaa! welcome to mother earth stranger, what are you called?"
spirituslibertatis 1 year ago
"Eeehm, Houston? I think I forgot my cheezburger on the moon..."
M0RGaN98 1 year ago
X PLANE IS CRAP!
steveman30 1 year ago
In October 1963, during moderately rough seas, Lt. James H. Flatley III USN landed a KC-130F Hercules re-fueler with a normal landing weight of 130000 pounds on the deck of U.S.S. Forrestal (CVA-59). The mission, to determine if the C-130 could be used as a "Super COD" aircraft. An L.S.O. named Daugherty gave Flatley an engine "chop" while still three or four feet off the deck. There were several landings and take-offs. The rest as they say is history.
templerman 1 year ago
is that x plane?
FSPROX 1 year ago
LMAO...he deployed the chute in midair.....
dinohoo 1 year ago
Ohhh, he's boss gonna be pissed off.
007super6 1 year ago
what was that a 2 mile long aircraft carrier?
TheMontanaDave 1 year ago
SO PIXELATED IT SUX
MrRobloMan 1 year ago
What sim was that?
DanM25456 1 year ago
OMG the parachute came out once u wer in the air???
bugs1com 1 year ago
in real not possible, the weigth's just to much
L0rdSaint 1 year ago
this game is fucking unrealistic
Psyblader501 1 year ago
man couldn't you have at least put a little song your video is not very good dont be offended
mrjohny193 1 year ago
thats why Microsoft wins!
hellzone100 1 year ago
the cockpit is not real
XPlaneFly 1 year ago
LUCKY, but nice
terminatorfresh666 1 year ago
The realism of X-Plane...
LukRacer 1 year ago
This is VERY unrealistic...
mounsteres 1 year ago 21
@mounsteres so it your mothers boob job lol jk but i agree
Survival101Kid 6 months ago
shouldnt the title be space shuttle landing on aircraft carrier
DRAGONIRONFIST 1 year ago
epic
rjholling 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In real life, you'd be screwed
SuperOriginalGuy 1 year ago
I thought this was a flight simulator
where did the spaceshuttle come from?
and what happened to the physics ?
sabacone 1 year ago
good job in the simulator. Unfortunately, that's impossible to do in the real world.
carpocrates 1 year ago
In terms of mass and glide speed the space shuttle isn't so outrageously off from typical navalized fighter aircraft that the scenario is unthinkable. No doubt a quick thinking air officer could jury rig something that would give the shuttle at least a fighting chance.
That said, if a real life landing went anywhere near as well as this one, it would be a minor miracle. Nice flying!
screwyou 1 year ago
:35 all i saw was dollar signs
squiddie96 1 year ago
fail
quikScOpez7 1 year ago
fucking shitty x-plane
JustAnOrdinarySimmer 1 year ago
good landing
douglaslcdc3 1 year ago
ive seen better
AMERICANPILOT2 1 year ago
Way parachute deployed was unrealistic O.o
secondlifeundergroun 1 year ago 2
Nice job even thou I dislike x-plane it's still nice
stephqaz 1 year ago
LoLLoLLoLLoLLoLLol
lolukas2 1 year ago
Bet the Hornet pilots were going like WTF?!
LukRacer 1 year ago 2
i've tryed this once and now theres 4 spaceshuttles in the ocean
Monkeyking9001 1 year ago 2
what game is this... FS2000
ritzcrackers27 1 year ago
Good job...
obdami 1 year ago
Excellent landing! I know this is very difficult because I used to practice carrier landings.
sammvoyager 1 year ago
This is my other account btw. hooverhiker and THU228 are one in the same.
hooverhiker 2 years ago
I play both X-Plane and MS FSX. And I know difficulties of landing on a moving carrier. But man, what a rouch, hard and fast landing?! Video is good and landing is not so good. Cheers.
axe1203 2 years ago
@axe1203 Guys I know you think this was a terrible landing and all, but here's a few things to consider:
1. I was flying this with no HUD. No way to track my elevation changes. Now way to track my airspeed or vertical decent rate. No way to flare appropriately or level out at the right altitude. I was flying pretty much exclusively with an outside view of the shuttle, which is very hard in a limited control situation such as a landing.
hooverhiker 2 years ago
@axe1203 2.The only time I used an inside view was when I released the chute which they use anyway whenever the shuttle lands. The shuttle has several miles to stop normally, but I did it in under 100 meters. The lowest speed the shuttle can maneuver is 150 knots. Any lower and you face stall and inability to correct your course.
hooverhiker 2 years ago
@axe1203 3. My joystick is really old and not very responsive. Kind of broken actually.
So considering all this, good landing eh?
-Tyler, Aerospace Engineering & Mechanics, University of Alabama
hooverhiker 2 years ago
No problem. Let's keep practicing. Cheers.
axe1203 2 years ago
fail landing, bit fast
MrTrains1 2 years ago
@MrTrains1 You're an idiot. The space shuttle is not designed to stop in that short a distance. Nor is it designed to fly that slow. It lands at like 250 knots.
hooverhiker 2 years ago
unrealistic crap...
jaybenny100 2 years ago
Sweet...
obdami 2 years ago
good job !!!!=D
frenchairarmy 2 years ago
Which game?
roverofwest 2 years ago
x-plane
OrcaTrainerOrlandoFL 2 years ago
haha -.- that was shit and silly but ... nice ^^
Simple4Play 2 years ago
is this flight gear???????
Potchy4 2 years ago
NICE flying, dude!!!
don312000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is off-topic but it's space-related.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
Cosmored 2 years ago
ha ha ha.... who needs the arrester cables? he's got a blanket with some strings hanging off the back ha ha ha.
Zetune79 2 years ago
lmfao
niknak1830 2 years ago
Flight Simulator 95, judging from the graphics.
fuzzybeard2016 2 years ago
The arrester cables on the carrier will have there work cut out for them trying to stop 100 metric tons coming in at over a 100 knots. lol..
but interesting..
cjpatz 2 years ago
...make that 195 knots, at an approach angle nine times that of an airliner (I don't know what naval aviation does). It usually needs a tad over 2.5 miles of landing space; I doubt it could possibly land on an aircraft carrier.
puncheex 2 years ago 19
@puncheex lol, tailhooks on an Enterprise? :P
lnternetBully 1 year ago
@lnternetBully: I assume your comment was aimed at the video in general. The whole concept was amusing in a fantastic sort of way, sort of like the video of the shuttle landing in downtown Cape Town, SA.
puncheex 1 year ago
@lnternetBully
i like your name xD
hateifly 1 year ago
@puncheex Hey, I'll bet it could land on a carrier. It would land and keep right on going off the other end. All 3 arrester cables and a bunch of safety nets wouldn't stop that big ol' flying brick yard. ;-) Cool and interesting video and concept though!
DaveJOHAZ 1 year ago
@DaveJOHAZ: Perhaps. The only problem is that since the shuttle has no usable engines, your next stop would be in the water.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex Not necesarily, the shuttle still has the OMS engines (the smaller ones above the SSME's) But i doubt they would be any help! ;)
Traxxasman11 1 year ago
@Traxxasman11: No, they do fine in space, but near the ground they wouldn't sustain the shuttle at all. They are about an order of magnitude too small to sustain level flight.
puncheex 1 year ago
i live right next to one of the space shuttles alternate landing sites (chennault int airport lake charles louisiana) and the runway is only 2 miles long so yeah it dont need 2.5 miles stop
linksys01112 1 year ago
@linksys01112No, but it would then need about ten million worth of work on the brakes.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex a flying brick!
elave16 1 year ago
@puncheex Dude.... he had para-stop...
:D
losingname 1 year ago
@losingname even with an 100x bigger parachute it would stop so fast, its more realistic that it would break of the end of the shuttle
Psyblader501 1 year ago
@Psyblader501 Yeeah... i kinda kid about that part.
losingname 1 year ago
@losingname oh okay^^
Psyblader501 1 year ago
@puncheex sure you could.... with.. like, uhm... a carrier doing 195 knots :P Man, you could even hover to your ramp position on the deck, how cool would that be!
JK ;-)
KriVaDesign 1 year ago
@puncheex depends on the carrier cables...
Doctor699 1 year ago
@puncheex maybe with the biggest fu---in arrestor hook in the world?? :-D
kyrkbymannen 1 year ago
@puncheex The navy does about 150-160 knots, it would possibly sink the carrier if ever even got on to the carrier in the first place. One shuttle weighs about 200,000 pounds, without any cargo or fuel or people, That is like 50 f-18s, more than half of any supercarrier's complement of aircraft. WITH all of a shuttle's cargo and equipment, I'd say it would have about 1/6th the mass of the entire carrier, which is A LOT.
TheNewCW 1 year ago
@TheNewCW: Oh, I agree it would be a major thing, but your mass figures are way off. The shuttle weighs a little over 2000 tons (4 million lbs). A Nimitz class carrier weighs in (or displaces, the naval term) 100,000 tons. The shuttle won't roll it, but it would make waves, as they say. Your average naval fighter, say a loaded F-18, runs about 30 tons.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex yep, but this is aviation and not real life
dutchbhproduction 11 months ago
@puncheex
Maybe with some ridiculous headwinds.
casdebom2 10 months ago
dude u were LUCKY!!
snoopylover4000 2 years ago 28
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some question about psychology:
(1) Why do we enjoy flying "Flight Stimulator"?
(2) What is the fun and happy to pilot different models of aeroplanes in the sky?
(3) What is the fun to flying in a way that can only be accomplish in "Flight Stimulator"? (eg. landing an 747 on a USS carrier on the sea)
(4) Why do we like to fly different aeroplane with different external paintings in different airlines?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative brainstorm!!!
applesweeter 2 years ago
LSO report: Little low flat start, little fly through up in the middle, not enough power in the come down in close, fast the ramp. Spotting the Deck ! No grade 3 wire.
ccblack1 2 years ago
What power? The shuttle has none.
puncheex 2 years ago
Mickey Mouse makes more sense ........cammon now a shuttle landing on a Carrier LMAO
ThePakistaniKing 2 years ago
were did u get that simulator? is it the same thing as flight simulator x?
kevininheven 2 years ago
The scale is way too small.
uTubeVIP 2 years ago
Haha, very nice. I doubt that's how it would be in real life, though. Shuttle would be going a lot faster.
hunterr83 2 years ago
rhat wasnt a landing
MrJoggl 2 years ago
YAY this sim shuttle has a parachute =D
M2Flamethrower 2 years ago 2
no way jose- you would have rocketed straight off the carrier.
BobbyB654321 2 years ago 3
it's x-plane 9
arctrooper22333 2 years ago
where can iget the game
plese tell me ok and i will sub
kevrego1989 2 years ago
wal-mart. Thats where i bought it. Make sure you have a nice computer though.
redjr1991 2 years ago
on my game i cant get it to fly!
uperdowner12 2 years ago
it's x-plane 8 or 9
23601 2 years ago
i have flight sim x with everything on ultra high with a 4gb ram wooooooooooot
Chriskoj 2 years ago
haha, so unrealistic!
joachim2464 2 years ago
simulator soorryy
Flybyhacker 2 years ago
no way
rickyzmkuo 2 years ago
wats this flight sim 98 haha
CamNUFC 3 years ago
No i think it is flight sim 45
logpie1 2 years ago
xD niiiice !
i never can do landings in carriers ! it'soo short
filipe026 3 years ago
try to stall near the runway... and pull parking bake(same as the normal brake but i dont need push ,).
merdaporrenta 2 years ago
what game is this?
spez1989 3 years ago