Added: 6 months ago
From: selfonlypath
Views: 2,573
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @selfonlypath

    Here are all of my ferroresonant transformers. And one scope shot in resonance. Will post more.

    overunity research (dot) com / index.(php)?topic=1146.0

    Please put address back together.

  • @minde4000 go to junkyards and look for Panasonic MWO but special ones: on the glass door, it is written INVERTER. You can also buy them on eBay but quite expensive. Then, view my YouTube video on Plasma Driver Part 6 providing deconstruction of the pana HV-PSU PCB. You need two of this trafo to then reproduce my 5-PH FR reactor.

  • @selfonlypath

    I tought its easier to find those inverters I will check out my local surplus store but I doubt they have anything so I will just stick with what I have. I did wind AWG 15 sedondary on my 8" toroid but thats it so far. Need AWG 12 for primary I suppose gonna be very hard to wind.

    I will rather wait for your new video with complete system.

  • @selfonlypath

    Have you ever tried or heard TV on new amorphous alloys like metglass, nickel cobalt and such? With very high permability or very little magneto-striction.

  • @minde4000 Nope so far but i would like very much to try except i don't know where to find them in junkyards.

    If you want to try my setup, go to junkyard & look for Sharp or Panasonic MWO (inverter type).

    P.S.1. What is your actual TV trafo ?

    P.S.2. Please be kind publish a video of your actual FR trafo to confirm reproduction of Jinis, Dan, myself,...

  • @selfonlypath

    I cannot find such trafos that look like yours on google. Would you happen to have a part number or type of MWO it was taken from? Thanks.

  • @selfonlypath

    ETA - estimated time of arrival. I am sure your H-bridge driver is much more sophisticated than mine but I am glad I have the one I have its good for what I need for now. I was asking about power source. Are you using only variac diode bridge and cap bank as your supply? Is your cap bank large enough to smooth out ripples? I also have variac but after last time my diode bridge blew up for unknown reason ever since I was reluctant to use this combination as my power supply...

  • @minde4000 As you can see on my recent videos, I'm using Philips lab power supplies PE154X series with X= 0 or 1 or 2. I use these lab PSU (no voltage ripple & current protected) because best to first learn with small power trafo.

  • @selfonlypath

    I am sorry. I confused you with Dan. He is using variac bridge and cap bank. I would like to know how well that works for him. Oh well lets just wait for your new video.

  • @minde4000: are u using a H-bridge (4 switches) as Dan or myself are doing ?

  • @selfonlypath

    Yes I am using H-Bridge. It has double 555 for initial driver pulse and other components to complete h-bridge and I have ability to adjust frequency without affecting pulse width and vise versa. Has 4 IRF640s. Capable of 12-200VDC and 1hz-110Khz.output I will make a video of that sometime too :) Combined with 2 high precision 10 turn variable resistors its very adjustuble. Switches really well - I can easily get saturated core nice waves - just like yours and Dans.

  • @minde4000 I assume you're using a laminated trafo as my friend Dan...

    have you tried TV on ferrite trafo ?

  • @selfonlypath I am using ferroresonant trafos they all contain 3 coils. Primary secondary and auxilary. I dont have ferrite trafos. I wish I had setup like yours. I have 8" ferrite toroid but nothing is wound on it. I would like to resonate that. Any ETA on your new complete setup video? Resonate stuff and tuning is nothing compared to your non reflective energy capturing setup that I wanna see. As a source are you using just a variac + diode bridge + cap bank? Nothing else to smooth ripple?

  • @minde4000 what does it mean ETA ?

    I need time to self-movie my new video with digital diode plug :(

    Dan build for me an octatron (8 isol-drivers) so my digital diode plug is controlled by software (no NE555).

    So far I was using Dan's quadratron (4 isol-drivers) controlled by PWM software but was only able to H-bridge. Now 4 IGBTs and 4 diodes for H-bridge then 4 IGBTs, 4 diodes & 2 caps for diode plug also controlled by PWM software.

  • @selfonlypath

    I did not know how else to express amount of VARs so I did it a "simple" way that I found on google wich applies to sinewaves. I agree the waves I get are not sinewaves but they somwhat resemble them. Sorry for incorrect measurements. I use 250 VA ferroresonant transformer. I dont think I have found the sweetest spot yet but 122hz 7uF are doing the best I have seen so far. An thats with 19VDC @ 4amps input. I need a descent power supply with higher power capabilities.

  • @minde4000 I'm afraid the definition of VAR you're using are incorrect mathematically. VAR has no direct link with RMS so to estimate VAR, you need special measurement equipment, very expensive like Lecroy, Rohde & Scharwz,...

  • @minde4000 my topology seems more complex & costly but has the advantage to separate independent diode plug and extractor plug so easier to tune. TV requires ferro-core to get the anomalous amplification effect. Air core ZPE reactor requires special self-cancelling coils (i.e. caduceus, moebius). Please share videos on your TV to have more independent worldwide reproduction confirming the effect. How do u tune ferro-freq because with ferrite, risk of mechanical explosion or destruction ?

  • The way I measure reactive power I take: resonating V (RMS) x resonating I (RMS) = VAR (RMS)

    I bought some HV (1KV VAC and 1.8KV VAC) oil caps today since my all other ones were 660VAC. P-p voltage is 1.51KV on my traffo so I was not able to achieve good results - nothing more than 1:14 input RMS vs circulating VARs ratio due to high leakage on 660VAC cap when dealing with 1.51KV AC. Now because of HV cap and min leakage I am able to achieve 1:22 ratio.

    76W RMS in and 1742 VAR RMS @ 122Hz.

  • @selfonlypath

    Your videos and presentations are very clear and very educating. Sorry if I am missing something here in your explanations. I hope to catch up on your complete setup next video. I will probably make a few videos of my own at some time later with various combinations from 60hz to 110khz that I am testing. So as I understand reactor must have a core for anomalous excess energy to appear. It cannot be aircore? Unless you resonate at copper self resonant frequency?

  • @selfonlypath

    I didnt say you use 3 caps I said the process that you described with 2 caps looks and perfoms almost like 3 cap setup but just much more switching involved. The interesting thing I noticed that obvious sharper peaks on saturated feroresonant trafo core consist of some sort or higher frequency harmonics because by applying scope filter to reject lets say everything above ~300h-400hz they dissapear and only simple sort of sine wave stays...while system resonates at 60hz. Thank You

  • @mind4000 Few comments prior my next video with digital diode plug running.

    1) you say I use 3 caps but I only use 2 caps ???

    2) you're applying VAR estimates used with single sinusoidal but here, we've polyphasic signals plus nonlinear resonant LC tanks so even if you non-reflective discharge partially one cap, it will have enough juice to maintain ferro-resonance

    3) the excess energy does not come from diode plug, it comes from ferrite self-modification due to ultra-nonlinear excitation

  • Another point. In my ferro in random case lets say it resonates @ 60hz when paired with 24uF capacitor. Cap is being charged to 350VDC max during each cycle. Now if I would manage to "steal" at least half of the power this cap holds @ 120 times per second there would be 0.735J x 120 = 88.2W. This does not even cover 110W input.. I am not even talking further VAR reduction due to energy extraction and all the further losses in switching. Anomalous power might be there but only till you touch it.

  • @selfonlypath

    I understand collector cap discharge does not reflect directly to source but at the very next cycle there will MORE empty caps or more capacistance to be charged and all this will severly affect system quality factor and VARs will drop. Excuse me if I dont see anything special here.. I really wish you could explain where am I missing the point. That is why I am waiting for your next video demonstrating all the switching and results.. I appreciate you response. Thank You

  • @selfonlypath

    Now during collapse cycle inductor will only see 1 - reflected energy from main tank cap. This was posted before by hector too.I still dont understand how your switching circuit and only 2 caps would change anything. Hows that different?

    You still using part of stored energy and rerouting the rest back to inductor. This is a REFLECTIVE loss from the system as a whole point of view. Continued

  • @selfonlypath

    I think I understand what are you showing here but all I can see this is just a more complicated analog to 3 cap setup with all the switching where main tank cap could do this on its own.. The only thing different here is that oscillation feedback would be somewhat like a time compressed chip controlled pulse instead of free energy swing back to inductor from main tank cap. During charging cycle LC would always "See" 2 caps empty - main tank and one of collector caps. Continued

  • @minde4000 The circuits published in the past were ATTEMPTS, but they have not been proven to be correct.

    We are all in a learning curve, and improve as we go...

  • @minde4000 The 3-cap setup has not yet worked in practice.

    De idea was that while the 'main' cap maintains the 'resonance', one of the other

    small caps is discharged in its blank interval.

    But this poses the problem that L only sees the main cap at first, until its

    voltage is reduced to the same level of one of the small caps, at which

    point L sees both caps.

    In other words, the capacitance varies suddenly, and you'll not get the full

    resonance. You get a semi-resonant circuit.

    cont. next reply

  • @minde4000 I think you're using an incorrect definition or description of what does NON-REFLECTIVE means !

  • @Selfonlypath

    I am also researching this with 3 ferroresonant transformers and few aircores at higher frequency. Cant wait to see your VAR extraction circuit.

  • Also on NON-REFLECTIVE part. Why would it be non reflective? Partial discharge of VARs will affect resonance of course. There will be less energy reflected back to inductor because some of it was used for load and circulating VARs will drop greatly.Power usage will diminish VAR buildup greatly.. I cant comment much about this without seeing actual effect..

  • @Selfonlypath

    ~21 min into your video you explain a pretty complex swtching-way to extract excess energy. with pole reversals and etc.. How about you would use a 3 cap setup as proposed by Dan so your "main" cap could maintain resonance and other 2 caps could be used to extract excess power. Easy to control amount of discharge by varying sizes of cap combination. This would make it so much simplier and with same effect: to reflect portion of charge back to inductor to maintain resonance. Tnx

  • Nice.

  • This video may be of some use to you for controlling the dark plug. Phase Lock Loops 101 watch?v=VP1XwIJHkyE This video will demonstrate how to properly avoid infinite loops in the logic. This method may prove more resilient to nature than time driven events as the PLL will adapt to each phase. I hope this helps.

  • Forget the measurement with the expensive meter.

    If you can extract excess power then that power should be able to be run back into the input of your device & you can remove the power supply completely.

    It should run own its own with No External Power.

    It is easy to measure incorrectly, thats what all the other experimenters are doing.

    Fooling themself with improper measurments.

  • @Texmurphy51: the expensive meter is only to optimize the best tuning frequency in order to couple maximum power from vacuum via ultra-nolinear resonance. Of course, you're right where an extracting plug behind the diode plug will act as kind of approximate power meter. I know how 99.999% of ZPE experiments fools themselves with incorrect power metering: i'm an electronic engineer for years so yes, power pulsed systems or polyphase systems are really tricky to power meter ;)

  • @selfonlypath You would not need a meter that measured correctly, only accurately to "tune" your experiment.

    You can turn all you like but the proof of the experiment will be to have the device feed its output energy to the input & have the ability to run on its own, plus produce output power.

    I am still interested in where you think the extra energy is coming from.

    As an EE you have to know that energy pretty much balanced out in loss & transfer to as far as the equipment can measure it.

  • @Texmurphy51: yes I'm an EE (MS and Ph.D) but also a quantum electrodynamics physicist plus lost of hand on practice since i'm 14. Nothing here is violating 2LT but as you know, linear maxwell equations or classic quantum physics do not describe ALL form of energies. Here we're dealing with nonlinear theories or chaos converter theory applied to RF coupling with vacuum or ZPE field via heterodyne or mixer devices except they are ultra-nonlinear.

  • @selfonlypath ZPE theoretically exists but the amount of energy in space is very very small. The Casimir effect shows how little energy there is to gather.

    How about 1LT. You need a source of energy.

    Sprinkling a bunch of terms like nonlinear theories & chaos, ZPE does not make this a valid hypothesis.

    What basis do you have that resonanting a coil will extract energy from the ZPE field?

    Again proof is, can it run unaided with no power input.

  • @Texmurphy51 First stage is proving an anomalous reactive power self-amplification (first video). Second stage is vectoring this reactive power in 2 reactive power legs thanks to diode plug (second video). Third stage will consist to use an extracting module stealing part of the excess reactive power from the diode plug without detuning the hyper-Q resonance or extinguishing the ZPE reactor...

  • @selfonlypath You speak of "excess reactive power"

    This is why I parallel this idea with that of Storn who says they will gather"excess power" from Back EMF.

    He sees when he removes power from back EMF that the current becomes more constant.

    Reason is that the back EMF opposes current. This means the average power usage increases. This is self defeating.

    When you remove power from your resonant circuit the Q will drop.

  • @Texmurphy51: I've already written you (see Part1 comments) that my reactor has NO link with Steorn, BEMF,... so I kindly suggest you view again both my videos detailling it is not about coil resonance but ferro-resonance (magneto-acoustic nonlinear resonance) where the LC tank is just to collect excess reactive power coupled from vacuum or ZPE field & trigger a sub-harmonic of this special resonance frequency. Maybe think in terms of dynamical Casimir effect ;)

  • @selfonlypath Even if you could tap into the ZPE field there is just not enough energy there.

    If you hang a copper wire outside & put a diode on it, you can gather Electromagnetic energy from Transmitters & space. If you did this you might be able to charge a AA battery in a week or so but its not enough energy to be worth it.

    Same with what your trying to do ZPE is very very spread out.

  • @Texmurphy51: I'm a radio amateur since age 14, i'm professional EE engineer & Ph.D with hands practice on radiocomm. When a kid, I made LW radio receiver per your above description, hang wire, diode, ear phone, no battery but this ONLY extracting energy from ambiant EM, transverse EM wave whereas a ZPE reactor extract from ZPE through longitudinal EM waves... You seem to mix & confuse everything where a ZPE reactor extracts energy from vacuum even in Faraday cage, submarine, aircraft...

  • @selfonlypath I understand in theory ZPE permeates all space. Matter is mostly empty space & the quantum flux is supposed to have particles coming in & out of existence, matter/energy back & forth, I get it.

    I am a ham also & made many a Xtal set with wire antenna when I was a kid.

    I have not seen any evidence of ZPE being collected by anyone so far, but I wish you luck.

    Saw a demo of the Tesla Scalar wave, It penetrates Faraday cage & transfers power.

    I cant explain how it works.

  • @Texmurphy51: it is important & crucial you're radio ham, practice RF engineering & open to ZPE sciences. If you agree, maybe here or via private exchange, how about you describe precisely the kind of measurement instrument V&V topology would convince you of the anomalous effect. As you might seen on my channel, I also have plasma RF experiment with anomalous reactive power amplification but I don't have variable gas pressure bench so the effect is less impressive than with ferro-resosance.

  • @selfonlypath Well Nothing would "convince" me over youtube. It is too easy to fake a video. You probably have seen them, Mylow was one of more famous ones who was caught.

    You need to have it tested under lab conditions to prove it to the world.

    As I said the easiest way is to feed ouput to input, showing it can run unpowered.

    If it does create free energy then this should be no problem.

    Those who try this sometimes try for years to get it to work.

  • @Texmurphy51 I fully agree with the issues you mention about fake ZPE reactor videos on YT. I've different objectives in my YT channel, one of them is based on Open Sourcing. I try give max info, instructions so ANYBODY with good electronics & software skills can reproduce what ever i've published with a low budget. About lab testing, you might have seen the type of equipment I have so far but remember your first post, I need a good active & reactive powermeter but this costs a lot of money !

  • @selfonlypath Excellent videos, thanks for sharing your exceptional knowledge, findings and talent. Thank you also very much for taking the time to explain your test setups and readings, and for providing some detailed explanation of the circuit operation. I also appreciate your credit to others and the reference material that you list for further study.

  • Good to see an electronics person actually explain some stuff and make a video worth some time. Good Vid Man. Take Care.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more