PETA (PEOPLE EUTHANIZING THE ANIMALS) HAS KILLED 2000++ DOGS -CATS EVERY YR RUNNING FOR LAST 25 YRS ALL IN NAME OF ETHICAL ANIMAL RIGHTS. THEN HAS NERVE TO CALL NOKILL RESCUERS, BREEDERS AND SO CALLED 'HOARDERS" AN ABUSER? DONT BELIEVE ME? GOOGLE "PETA EUTHANIZATION RATES" THEN ASK SELF ''WHO IS REAL ABUSER HERE? A HOARDER? A BREEDER? A NO KILL RESCUER? OR AN "ETHICAL" ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUP THAT TAKES IN 40 MILLION $ YR TO "SAVE ANIMALS" YET EUTHANIZES BY TRUCKLOAD/THOUSANDS?
@Darkstorms15@TheOpenMinded12460 How could you say that? The ELF are arsonists, they are putting CO2 in the air, green house gasses, endangering life, and making more pollution than the house ever was.
Watch the documentary, "battle for the trees". Scientists say that our practice of replacing deserts with monocultures of trees doesn't do shit for wildlife and an healthy ecosystem, except giving a visual confort to our decrepit mass industrial psychology. Anyway, even if counting trees is your thing and there is nothing I can do about it, the fact is we hardly have any trees left from 400 years ago. The tendency is clearly in destroying nature, with 200 species being wiped out every day.
From what I have been reading, some places have in fact been recovering from massive actions of deforestation. Yes. But overall, the industrial civilization is in a process of destroying the environment and creating a less sustainable world. You fun stats may be amusing for museums, but they don't necessarily reflect what is going on in terms of real life demands. So what if we are "aborbing more carbon"? We are all closer to living with freaking oxygen tanks in our backs.
The Global Humanitarium Forum believes that climate change is responsible for the killing of 300 000 people per year. The ELF may even be stupid or clueless, but please don't come here arguing as if we were dealing with a couple of vandal kids with nothing better to do. They ARE fighting a meaningful, life-defense cause. And if they burn a tree to save a thousand, that is intelligent and good. It's called strategy and priorities. LaurenandAngela, you should think about that.
WHattttttttttttttttttttttttt burning down homes which store the carbon in their walls is good for the environment. Think about this. Trees absorb carbon from the environment. If trees are planted and utilized in homes..they store said carbon. The more homes that are built, the more carbon that is stored in said homes. Burning these homes RELEASES the carbon.Fuck you for promoting the destruction of this world through your ignorance.
Present day, there are more trees than 100 years old. This is indisputable fact. The diversity of trees has been reduced but there are MORE TREES THAN BEFORE.
Some sources here would be useful. I am not aware on your theory about houses being a new postive species for humans/earth. All sources I have seen indicate that the loggin industry, namely the one involved in building houses, has lead to a process of deforestation. I believe there are less trees, and therefore less sources of oxygen. I don't understand your wild theories on carbon absorption, but it seems to go against any sense of an healthy ecosystem. Perhaps some data would be good.
Okk they really care bout the world... are you fucking retarded they are making everything worse! they are adding more harmful fumes to the air and just think there might have been people or animals living there or around that house. wat if that was your house and all your belongings were in there and some assholes that think they are helping the world come along and burn it all down how would you feel. you weren't really smart bout what you were writing.
In this case, arguing that they shouldnt pollute is like saying that people who work in cleaning the oil from the ocean shouldnt do that because they have to piss in the sea while they are there. I think that you dont have an idea of the dimension of what we are up against. I dont give a fuck about the headache that this mass murders are having. I am more worried about 200 species being wiped out from the face of the earth everyday, and me having a place where I can breathe as a human being.
Its ironic that you fearmonger about the possibility of a couple of animals being killed- You dont give any insight on the probability, or talk about the consideration of the consequences that lead this people to establish such priorities in such a way. I dont think you believe that this people havent thought about that or dont care. Please stop writing about how people are not smart as you are. if anything, you should prove that through the discussion. Read the personal reply I sent you.
people work hard for those houses and those asses just can care less up the fires can spread to trees and dont you think the smoke is harming it also and they dont think once about the people who are inside
If they didn't think or care, they wouldn't see to it that no one got hurt, and that the flames wouldn't spread. Maybe you don't think or care, or don't bother to ask, about the relation between what they are doing and their pro-environment stance. I am sure they are aware that their little fires pollute, but also that you have to break some eggs when you are fighting mass-scale factories of pollution. There're more important things than feelings of "people who work hard" for kingsize bathrooms
ok i don't talk politics i plan to move out of the u.s soon anyways i am willing to put up with anarchists but not the crazy ones like in greece who are hurting people lifes with their senseless destructuion and chaos people die people get killed by others what the police did was wrong but we don't know their side of the story the could have been doing something that was a criminal act but i do believe countrys needs law and rules or else it falls into chaos
abolish anarchism capitalism rules what about that one i am sorry i like voting for my leaders not having a bunch of dumb ass college hippies running the country
There is much more concern over the harm to the natural environment from the houses development. There actions will detere similar building projects, saving future lives and habitats. With the amount of polution from industries every day, this equates to smoking a cigerette in regards to co2 emissions.
PETA (PEOPLE EUTHANIZING THE ANIMALS) HAS KILLED 2000++ DOGS -CATS EVERY YR RUNNING FOR LAST 25 YRS ALL IN NAME OF ETHICAL ANIMAL RIGHTS. THEN HAS NERVE TO CALL NOKILL RESCUERS, BREEDERS AND SO CALLED 'HOARDERS" AN ABUSER? DONT BELIEVE ME? GOOGLE "PETA EUTHANIZATION RATES" THEN ASK SELF ''WHO IS REAL ABUSER HERE? A HOARDER? A BREEDER? A NO KILL RESCUER? OR AN "ETHICAL" ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUP THAT TAKES IN 40 MILLION $ YR TO "SAVE ANIMALS" YET EUTHANIZES BY TRUCKLOAD/THOUSANDS?
TheExposingthelies 7 months ago
GO ELF!!!
Darkstorms15 2 years ago
@Darkstorms15 @TheOpenMinded12460 How could you say that? The ELF are arsonists, they are putting CO2 in the air, green house gasses, endangering life, and making more pollution than the house ever was.
TheOpenminded12460 1 year ago
Watch the documentary, "battle for the trees". Scientists say that our practice of replacing deserts with monocultures of trees doesn't do shit for wildlife and an healthy ecosystem, except giving a visual confort to our decrepit mass industrial psychology. Anyway, even if counting trees is your thing and there is nothing I can do about it, the fact is we hardly have any trees left from 400 years ago. The tendency is clearly in destroying nature, with 200 species being wiped out every day.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago 2
Good job! A+
GrizzlyRecoveryZone1 2 years ago
Some signs of recuperation come from the USA. But just search "deforestation united states" in google images to get the big picture.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
....oh, and fuck environmentalists. I don't like them either. They are about as useful as stamp collectors.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
From what I have been reading, some places have in fact been recovering from massive actions of deforestation. Yes. But overall, the industrial civilization is in a process of destroying the environment and creating a less sustainable world. You fun stats may be amusing for museums, but they don't necessarily reflect what is going on in terms of real life demands. So what if we are "aborbing more carbon"? We are all closer to living with freaking oxygen tanks in our backs.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
lol I meant 100 years ago...
axe863 2 years ago
The Global Humanitarium Forum believes that climate change is responsible for the killing of 300 000 people per year. The ELF may even be stupid or clueless, but please don't come here arguing as if we were dealing with a couple of vandal kids with nothing better to do. They ARE fighting a meaningful, life-defense cause. And if they burn a tree to save a thousand, that is intelligent and good. It's called strategy and priorities. LaurenandAngela, you should think about that.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
WHattttttttttttttttttttttttt burning down homes which store the carbon in their walls is good for the environment. Think about this. Trees absorb carbon from the environment. If trees are planted and utilized in homes..they store said carbon. The more homes that are built, the more carbon that is stored in said homes. Burning these homes RELEASES the carbon.Fuck you for promoting the destruction of this world through your ignorance.
axe863 2 years ago
Present day, there are more trees than 100 years old. This is indisputable fact. The diversity of trees has been reduced but there are MORE TREES THAN BEFORE.
axe863 2 years ago
Some sources here would be useful. I am not aware on your theory about houses being a new postive species for humans/earth. All sources I have seen indicate that the loggin industry, namely the one involved in building houses, has lead to a process of deforestation. I believe there are less trees, and therefore less sources of oxygen. I don't understand your wild theories on carbon absorption, but it seems to go against any sense of an healthy ecosystem. Perhaps some data would be good.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
Okk they really care bout the world... are you fucking retarded they are making everything worse! they are adding more harmful fumes to the air and just think there might have been people or animals living there or around that house. wat if that was your house and all your belongings were in there and some assholes that think they are helping the world come along and burn it all down how would you feel. you weren't really smart bout what you were writing.
LaurenandAngela 2 years ago
In this case, arguing that they shouldnt pollute is like saying that people who work in cleaning the oil from the ocean shouldnt do that because they have to piss in the sea while they are there. I think that you dont have an idea of the dimension of what we are up against. I dont give a fuck about the headache that this mass murders are having. I am more worried about 200 species being wiped out from the face of the earth everyday, and me having a place where I can breathe as a human being.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
Its ironic that you fearmonger about the possibility of a couple of animals being killed- You dont give any insight on the probability, or talk about the consideration of the consequences that lead this people to establish such priorities in such a way. I dont think you believe that this people havent thought about that or dont care. Please stop writing about how people are not smart as you are. if anything, you should prove that through the discussion. Read the personal reply I sent you.
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
Get r done..
draco5638 2 years ago
Absolutely..they got their message out!
checkmybigboobs 2 years ago
people work hard for those houses and those asses just can care less up the fires can spread to trees and dont you think the smoke is harming it also and they dont think once about the people who are inside
LaurenandAngela 2 years ago
If they didn't think or care, they wouldn't see to it that no one got hurt, and that the flames wouldn't spread. Maybe you don't think or care, or don't bother to ask, about the relation between what they are doing and their pro-environment stance. I am sure they are aware that their little fires pollute, but also that you have to break some eggs when you are fighting mass-scale factories of pollution. There're more important things than feelings of "people who work hard" for kingsize bathrooms
freedomclubLX 2 years ago
ok i don't talk politics i plan to move out of the u.s soon anyways i am willing to put up with anarchists but not the crazy ones like in greece who are hurting people lifes with their senseless destructuion and chaos people die people get killed by others what the police did was wrong but we don't know their side of the story the could have been doing something that was a criminal act but i do believe countrys needs law and rules or else it falls into chaos
officerbawden17 2 years ago
abolish anarchism capitalism rules what about that one i am sorry i like voting for my leaders not having a bunch of dumb ass college hippies running the country
officerbawden17 2 years ago
hippies lol... go vote for mccain, but first, pay him for hands-treatment he cant even fucking lift them normally lol
FNO108 2 years ago
thats pretty fucking cold... he endured extreme torture.
axe863 2 years ago
yeah, and funny, it didnt teach him anything? if he did, he wouldnt run for a (bush-like-) president...
FNO108 2 years ago
Without people like ELF, ALF Greenpeace etc, the world would be a bigger shit hole than it already is!
checkmybigboobs 2 years ago
g-d i hope they catch the assholes that did this and burn there homes down and there parents houses
cowboys1983 3 years ago
i agree with the last dude it
Danguide1 3 years ago
Can you radical arsonists do us 9/11 truthers a favor and take on Cheney, Bush, wolfowitz, Silversteirn etc?
We need some radical torch carrying villagers.
Long live the constitution of the USA.
beastshawnee 3 years ago
Burn!!! Burn!! hahaha :)
condorlegion89 3 years ago
great work guys bloody smelly mcdonalds i hope they all dissapear one day and we can live in a better healty world.
Eviash 3 years ago
Our hearts with you comrades.We will burn all the houses, we will kill all the hunters till enviroment is free!
extrip1344 3 years ago
have fun in a jail cell this where they belong they have commited a crime they will be captured and will be punished for it
officerbawden17 2 years ago
There is much more concern over the harm to the natural environment from the houses development. There actions will detere similar building projects, saving future lives and habitats. With the amount of polution from industries every day, this equates to smoking a cigerette in regards to co2 emissions.
untilallarefree 3 years ago 5
This is pointless terrorism. And what about all the carbon emissions from the burning houses?
oclandestin 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
FNO108 2 years ago