very nice, but useless because qpi n all that sht only work at 16 bit half duplex n half memory speed, but memory controller also. soryy! intel sucks also no sw available for 6 cores, neither 4 cores. stop the lie. we need better cores n sw, no more cores n more cores is useless also intel cooler always bad too
@ThaDK00 you are really mistaken if you think that just because those cpu's have the same clock speed they performe the same. Intel`s cpu are way better, but they are too expensive.
@56fisher56 yea i figured that out when i saw CPU game benchmarkes i7 gives you almost +10 FPS in every game(compared to the quad core AMD) but i dont think 10 FPS is worth like 300 euro
@ThaDK00 I wasnt talking just about gaming, but anyways, I think you are right, Intel's products are over priced, I just wanted to make clear that even if they are over priced, intel's CPU are better than AMD's
@xITechMediaIx threads are want the pc uses to process data usually if u say had 4 cores that is 4 threads so the pc and programs have the extra cores / threads to depend on and use, not a lot of programs use the threads them selves more cores is a little better, the place where threads help over cores is gaming, Auto CAD things like that, but say if u r doing some thing that uses the cores u can go onto some thing else and the pc will go to the threads seen as there not being used..
@HologramKS yeah pretty much, the 980x will be the extreme ed. at 3.33Ghz and the 980 should be at 2.4Ghz, but Intel might change it around not to many people are sure about the lower end version's clock speed
ha, i think its too much processing power, ,i use my i7 920 to do video editing, music editing and shit like that,, and most of the time cpu usage is only 1 to 10 percent, in reality its more than 10 percent because i have HT on, , ,
it would be a nice upgrade, but how much % improvment do you get in comparision with an i7-920? In some Benchmarkprogramm the difference is surely a bit greater, but in present computer times there is no need for it in prax.
What makes you think that Intel having more cores gives them the advantage? You got it twisted, AMD will have a 8 and 16 cores CPUs as well but Intel will have faster CPus clock per clock as they always had since Core 2 Duo. I'm not stating they will catch up, i'm actually HOPING they will so we can benefit from the competition.I wouldn't like any of them to win the war instead i'd like them to exchange places for the best performer each year.
All this ram stuff confuses me. All sites say supports 1366mhz ram. Will I have to downgrade my corsair dominator TR3X3G1600C8D? (it's at 1600mhz timed to 7-7-7-24) so is it no i7 980x with that memory combination?
all the Core I7's have a memory controller clocked at 1066mhz, but all kind of memory can work with that chip, people have even been using ram thats at like 2100mhz and thats over the double limit, the only thing u might have to do is set the timings your self, the cpu & board may set it to 1333mhz just up them to 1600 and correct the timings and every thing will work fine, good luck & Thanks for watching
ex980 is going to be quad core alright. ..since intel stated that 6 core processor wont come out anytime soon until sandy bridge is out. so yeah "sandy bridge" is core i9's codename.
i dont really think six will be much of different from quad core. for simple application or single thread performance a six core performs equal or less than a dual core processor. however you can say multitasking will be future. but howmany people would playing game while listen mp3/itune and open virtual machine, bit torrent, office word...etc all in the same time on a single desktop...i dont think so..
the extreme ed. is going to be 3.33Ghz, the lowest end version is 2.4Ghz, the song is a audio mix, ill try and find the name 4 u, thanks for watching !
its not called i9 anymore its gonna b called i7 980X ... i think but this is from a mate who has pretty much the newest stuff in intel and nvidia so i trust him
Core i7 980X Extreme Edition clocked at 3.33GHz prices $1000 is slated on March 2010 along with the Core i7 930 clocked at $2.80GHz priced $284 I think I saw it on TechPowerUp!!!
GO INTEL!!! Ya, go ahead, make the i9 so that people that waited for the i7 price to drop will go out and buy one?? I don't think any of this makes sense an i9 is completely WORTHLESS, unless it has upgraded cache, other than that a CPU with over 3ghz is completely un-necessary, especially with 16 cpu's !!!! c'mon intel, make the better processor but lower the price tag so that everyone can buy it.
you cant really see the performance difference between the new CPUs without a benchmark. I think its a total waste of money to buy the "fastest" CPUs just for bragging rights. I can afford the i7 but will settle for AMD just because I can save money.
I got a phenom 940 but if you really want the greatest for gaming just get i5 750 or i7 860 at most then just blast to it 4ghz and your set...there's no reason to go with the 920 or higher unless your running more than 1 monster video card...
I'm going to take a wild guess here, the "s" in your post stands for smart. Because everyone knows smart people do research before they spend tons of money on computer parts.
Right now I've got the q6600 like a lot of people and I think I will either jump into the i9 or go for the next lineup, but not if the next line up uses a different socket because I don't want to spend another $300 on a new motherboard. If I remember correctly socket 775 dates back to intel Celeron so maybe that will be just before they release another socket type.
you tought ati or nvidia would have put 2 gpu cores on one die by now not dual gpu cards if they where on 1 die the cards would be alot smaller and fit in most mid tower cases...
Nice! As the time for release gets closer, more info should be coming out! Looking froward to all the info on this CPU, before I make a decision to buy or not! Judging by what I just saw, these CPU's should be AWESOME! Thanks for the leaked Specs! 5/5
yeah it should be awesome, but i can just imagine the price of it, i heard the extreme ed. might be around $1000 but i think thats still great considering the performance, i even heard that they over clock insane some people got it to 5.2ghz with water cooling !, not to sure if its true though, Thanks 4 watching !
ur idiot AMD is putting out a 6 core in later 2010 AMD=poor people ATI=stupid people (some may disargge because they have DX11 and r faster right now but only 1 game is DX11 dirt 2 maybe more and ATI doesnt support 3D witch is amazing)
Ur the idiot. Amd people arnt poor. Its all a bout price vs performance . If i had a amd 965 and a 5870. And u had a i7 920 and a 5870 very little diffrance would be noticed
I have a 955 and have a 5850 on the way to replace my 4890. I'm all for price/performance. Hell, AMD's top line is 200 vs. 1000. Real world performance, and gaming is hard to separate. That's why Windows 7 chose ATI features for DX11.
yeah, id go with a amd system if ur on a budget or some thing like that, im just not that much of an amd fan, id rather pay a little more for some thing i trust sadly intel knows that and thats y there prices r so high lol, im not to sure but microsoft prefers amd & ati or intel & nvidia, Thanks 4 watching
WHAT IS THE FREAKING SONG NAME???????
LordLoveDoom 9 months ago
rate this up please until someone responds.
Song name plz??
bettergaming1 9 months ago 2
I think is only 12 threads, the reason why the task manager showing 24 threads is because they were 2 processor in that motherboard if I am right.
lalula2 11 months ago
please what is the name of the song?
smglsnk 1 year ago
wtf 24 cores?! HOLY FéP%&$&$£!
Eragon86micky 1 year ago
6 dislikes = 6 people still using intel celeron 220
SkulLzSouL 1 year ago
i think it has 15 threads
farhanahmed1985 1 year ago
What Is the Song Name?
Zayndi103 1 year ago
What Is theSong Name?
Zayndi103 1 year ago
Name of the song,plz!
Zayndi103 1 year ago
With every new processor they design, it seems like their thermal design power keeps increasing... so called energy efficient! - I don't think so.
1AppleMaker 1 year ago
lol 6 cores
33grass33 1 year ago
Songname?
Gedankenblitz15 1 year ago
I don't care the stock speed, but all I care is price. i7 980x $1000? forget it. I will stick with i7 930 for $199.99.
damtachoa 1 year ago
name of song...
andriyDE 1 year ago
very nice, but useless because qpi n all that sht only work at 16 bit half duplex n half memory speed, but memory controller also. soryy! intel sucks also no sw available for 6 cores, neither 4 cores. stop the lie. we need better cores n sw, no more cores n more cores is useless also intel cooler always bad too
icguilty 1 year ago
when are they gonna make a processor at stock default clock 4ghz at the start? XD
notozx 1 year ago
real benefit from this chip right now have only high priced multi threading professional app
btw OCed QuadCore 930 easily beat 6cores from AMD so my traditional chose is Intel.
3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX 1 year ago
this card is 1000 euro, its the best Intel ( @3.3Ghz quad) The best AMD is 140 euro ( @3.2Ghz quad) that's why I chose AMD.
ThaDK00 1 year ago
@ThaDK00 Its 822 euros for the intel. And its about 240 euros for the AMD. So youre wrong!
danielmadstv 1 year ago
@danielmadstv well its the same preformance but around 600 euro difference
ThaDK00 1 year ago
@ThaDK00 you are really mistaken if you think that just because those cpu's have the same clock speed they performe the same. Intel`s cpu are way better, but they are too expensive.
56fisher56 1 year ago
@56fisher56 yea i figured that out when i saw CPU game benchmarkes i7 gives you almost +10 FPS in every game(compared to the quad core AMD) but i dont think 10 FPS is worth like 300 euro
ThaDK00 1 year ago
@ThaDK00 I wasnt talking just about gaming, but anyways, I think you are right, Intel's products are over priced, I just wanted to make clear that even if they are over priced, intel's CPU are better than AMD's
56fisher56 1 year ago
@ThaDK00 300 euro worth less of graphics card ? xD
hyrael2 1 year ago
24 cores O_O wtf was that? And How?!?!? I want it!
DJBFilmz 1 year ago
@DJBFilmz No it's 12 threads. Not 24. it's the cores split into 12. i have one I made a video about it.
Madblaster89 1 year ago
Intel r garbage fags who overprice nd they r also arab terrorists
AMD/ATI r the chip maker 4 the people nd r also greatly priced!!
GameRemix 1 year ago
@GameRemix Its true AMD sell cheaper, but you cant compare AMD's performance to INTEL's performance....
56fisher56 1 year ago
FAIL
crissglitch666 1 year ago
its £900 in the uk
LLOYD19851012 1 year ago
Cuys wait for the i7 970, it is the same but just .1-.3 Ghz lower.
dogman1090 1 year ago
song?????????????
DjShanghai100 1 year ago
Lol in Holland this thing cost 999 euro!
so you've 6x 3333Mhz!
and uses 130 watts
234jari234 1 year ago
whats the song ? and nice video :D
hullnash 1 year ago
i7-980 Processor Extreme Edition 6Cores is out in Netherlands now and Cost € 999.- euro
Yaratilistr 1 year ago
the 980X is an Extreme Ediot Version of 980... so its up to the consumer to be fooled..
aparach 1 year ago
@aparach, extreme's are better!
Unlocked multipliers - easier to OC.
So it's not exactly being fooled for people who want to get the maximum juice out of their system.
But I can agree that it is a steep price difference, and isn't worth it for the PRICE:PERFORMANCE ratio.
AmH032uTuBe 1 year ago
AMD is in trouble...
vangstaz 1 year ago 2
Core i7 980X only 110$ lol
TheArea510 1 year ago
grate
jiddisch 1 year ago
I don't understand threads, help plz?
xITechMediaIx 1 year ago
@xITechMediaIx threads are want the pc uses to process data usually if u say had 4 cores that is 4 threads so the pc and programs have the extra cores / threads to depend on and use, not a lot of programs use the threads them selves more cores is a little better, the place where threads help over cores is gaming, Auto CAD things like that, but say if u r doing some thing that uses the cores u can go onto some thing else and the pc will go to the threads seen as there not being used..
TylertheGeek28 1 year ago
Sp the only difference between the 980 and the 980x ee is the stock clock?
HologramKS 1 year ago
@HologramKS yeah pretty much, the 980x will be the extreme ed. at 3.33Ghz and the 980 should be at 2.4Ghz, but Intel might change it around not to many people are sure about the lower end version's clock speed
TylertheGeek28 1 year ago
@TylertheGeek28 Ha Its just thier way of ripping people off for more money because a lot of them dont know how to overclock >:)
This is just like the 975 and 920 D0 stepping all yu had to do with the 920 was overclock it.
HologramKS 1 year ago
can someone msg me the track to this video, thanksss ! its a hype beat
I4NI420 1 year ago
I'ma be all over it when I get one. :]
CradleInTheCrater 1 year ago
This thing is gonna be a fucking BEAST!! I'll be getting one for sure, then I'm selling my i7 975. Will they have an Extreme Edition for this one?
CPUMaster500 1 year ago
@CPUMaster500 yeah the 980 will be at 2.4Ghz and the extreme edition will be 3.33Ghz
TylertheGeek28 1 year ago
ha, i think its too much processing power, ,i use my i7 920 to do video editing, music editing and shit like that,, and most of the time cpu usage is only 1 to 10 percent, in reality its more than 10 percent because i have HT on, , ,
bigdima3 1 year ago
@bigdima3 yeah totally unnecessary for a gamer or home user
ezkeyboardkid58 1 year ago
I seriously doubt many games will have a big difference between a Core i5-750 and this one.
Four cores at 2.66 GHz, that'll do it.
Usul573 1 year ago
haswell comes out 2012
AndrewDaniele87 1 year ago
friggen ridiculous :)
GhostRyder2008 1 year ago
amd needs to spec their thuban like this.
my friend wants a core i7 920, i wished he got a 975 so we could compare benchmarks when i get this for my BROTHER"s RIG.
im using a Phenom x6 1057T or something like that
thegreyvingian 2 years ago
i wish AMD could do this
thegreyvingian 2 years ago
@thegreyvingian
they will
they will release a 6 core CPU @ 26 April
SutkasFan 2 years ago
it would be a nice upgrade, but how much % improvment do you get in comparision with an i7-920? In some Benchmarkprogramm the difference is surely a bit greater, but in present computer times there is no need for it in prax.
GunBoTT 2 years ago
Song name ? :)
Samsungs777 2 years ago
What makes you think that Intel having more cores gives them the advantage? You got it twisted, AMD will have a 8 and 16 cores CPUs as well but Intel will have faster CPus clock per clock as they always had since Core 2 Duo. I'm not stating they will catch up, i'm actually HOPING they will so we can benefit from the competition.I wouldn't like any of them to win the war instead i'd like them to exchange places for the best performer each year.
kalimul 2 years ago
All this ram stuff confuses me. All sites say supports 1366mhz ram. Will I have to downgrade my corsair dominator TR3X3G1600C8D? (it's at 1600mhz timed to 7-7-7-24) so is it no i7 980x with that memory combination?
Axemasta 2 years ago
all the Core I7's have a memory controller clocked at 1066mhz, but all kind of memory can work with that chip, people have even been using ram thats at like 2100mhz and thats over the double limit, the only thing u might have to do is set the timings your self, the cpu & board may set it to 1333mhz just up them to 1600 and correct the timings and every thing will work fine, good luck & Thanks for watching
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
It's a beast, hope AMD will catch up next year cause they suck in the high end. They ain't got shit on the Core i7 series.....
kalimul 2 years ago
it will cost your arm leg!!!!
meishongzai 2 years ago
ex980 is going to be quad core alright. ..since intel stated that 6 core processor wont come out anytime soon until sandy bridge is out. so yeah "sandy bridge" is core i9's codename.
hanrinch 2 years ago
i think its codename is gultftown. and the 980 processor is going have six cores. and as the guy below me said, its going to be released in march.
naved001video 2 years ago
i dont really think six will be much of different from quad core. for simple application or single thread performance a six core performs equal or less than a dual core processor. however you can say multitasking will be future. but howmany people would playing game while listen mp3/itune and open virtual machine, bit torrent, office word...etc all in the same time on a single desktop...i dont think so..
hanrinch 2 years ago
2.21 if you look good you will see that the 9 is fake O_O
g0dverark 2 years ago
song naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame!
andronickvll 2 years ago
one of these is might be on ebay i heard that some first testers of new chip after using them sell them on there.
j7x54 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT @_@ i wanna have sex with that cpu! anyways what's the name of the song,and how much GHZ will have the extreme version?
andronickvll 2 years ago
the extreme ed. is going to be 3.33Ghz, the lowest end version is 2.4Ghz, the song is a audio mix, ill try and find the name 4 u, thanks for watching !
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
and anyways ,how much do you think the prices will drop when the new series will come out? @_@ song name again? lol xD
andronickvll 2 years ago
Nerd Porn,
ME WANT ONE
seanpduffyeng 2 years ago
lol weird comment, but yea i agree
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
At least Intel is finally getting rid of that worthless cooler I got with my 920...
Whitehorze 2 years ago
its only running at 2.4GHz.. WTF!
MrFatCurry 2 years ago
@MrFatCurry 6 cores more heet more heet lower clocks
club4ghz 2 years ago
yeap but is 32nm witch means tha it will overclock like HELL :P
TelisRafa 2 years ago
@TelisRafa But you will have to use 32nm voltages
freddieman23 2 years ago
@freddieman23 ...32nm cores can handle voltages up to 2volts with LN2 so....
TelisRafa 2 years ago
I HEARD this cpu is gonna be 900 bucks . damm gotta start saving
cisco760ca 2 years ago
thats more cheaper than the i7 when it first came out - though.. it was $1,250.. so its a damn good price
MrFatCurry 2 years ago
@cisco760ca $999 actually
freddieman23 2 years ago
Im getting a IMac in March with this processor. This is going to be a wicked processer
StoneColdKiller117 2 years ago
Cool CPUs'!!! Do you know anything about i3 specs?
mitsostsagka 2 years ago
check my other videos, there is one called i3 & i5 cpu's thats what your looking for
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
Nice song what is it called?? I've got the i7-920 now overclocked at 3.2gHz and I could not be more happy with it!! :D
Valentino319 2 years ago
cool stuff, wait for gulftown to upgrade with 6 cores. That's what I'm doing.
virtual855 2 years ago
hey man i really like the song....... whats the name of it????
janicijevic23 2 years ago
its not called i9 anymore its gonna b called i7 980X ... i think but this is from a mate who has pretty much the newest stuff in intel and nvidia so i trust him
dipakmistry94 2 years ago
@dipakmistry94 core i9 is the nick name everyone gave it. you are right it is also called i7 980x either one works but more people call it core i9
minimanturbo 2 years ago
hi good video. say tha name of the song plz?????
Yaenipponcover 2 years ago
Core i7 980X Extreme Edition clocked at 3.33GHz prices $1000 is slated on March 2010 along with the Core i7 930 clocked at $2.80GHz priced $284 I think I saw it on TechPowerUp!!!
Mupp1t 2 years ago
price on the 980 r a little high, but for the power i guess not bad, thanks 4 watching
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
GO INTEL!!! Ya, go ahead, make the i9 so that people that waited for the i7 price to drop will go out and buy one?? I don't think any of this makes sense an i9 is completely WORTHLESS, unless it has upgraded cache, other than that a CPU with over 3ghz is completely un-necessary, especially with 16 cpu's !!!! c'mon intel, make the better processor but lower the price tag so that everyone can buy it.
bmw2go11 2 years ago
I See nothing wrong with the pricetag for great performance. If u cant afford it then go buy amd :P
l2Bubble 2 years ago
you cant really see the performance difference between the new CPUs without a benchmark. I think its a total waste of money to buy the "fastest" CPUs just for bragging rights. I can afford the i7 but will settle for AMD just because I can save money.
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
* Support for X58 chipset
I am fairly sure that intel will release a faster layout than the x58, maby a x116???? anything is possible at this point in time.
bmw2go11 2 years ago
FAKE
N2K10 2 years ago
SkyNet. :O
I4NI420 2 years ago 2
i notice that core i9 is socket 1366, so does that mean we can use X58 Mobo? Cause i know the AMD 6 core is compatible with AM3 Platforms.
nvidiasucks 2 years ago
yes u can
pogodrummer 2 years ago
Core i9 is my bicth
kevincrutchley 2 years ago
i5 is for me
i think is all i need
ofcorse whit 4GB ddr3 ram
flashboyonly 2 years ago
ohh i can't wait to get my hands on one of those fricken crazy AMD are really lagging behind
judoisoww 2 years ago
I got a phenom 940 but if you really want the greatest for gaming just get i5 750 or i7 860 at most then just blast to it 4ghz and your set...there's no reason to go with the 920 or higher unless your running more than 1 monster video card...
slightlyretarded1 2 years ago 2
AMD might be really shit but ATI rules!
huzibizi 2 years ago
The next gen of computers will be
* xdr2 ram (much faster than ddr3)
* pci 3.0
* usb 3.0
* Sata 3
* QPI(replacing FSB)
* CPU integrated graphics
The i9 will have 4mb more cache than i7 so I'm saying this will be the next gen of the PC sense these are not incremental changes.
hockey14822 2 years ago
man, u r really s noob collecting info from the net and posting it on utube
pogodrummer 2 years ago
I'm going to take a wild guess here, the "s" in your post stands for smart. Because everyone knows smart people do research before they spend tons of money on computer parts.
hockey14822 2 years ago
^^ nice try, im gonna rank u up 4 this ;P
pogodrummer 2 years ago
Right now I've got the q6600 like a lot of people and I think I will either jump into the i9 or go for the next lineup, but not if the next line up uses a different socket because I don't want to spend another $300 on a new motherboard. If I remember correctly socket 775 dates back to intel Celeron so maybe that will be just before they release another socket type.
hockey14822 2 years ago
you tought ati or nvidia would have put 2 gpu cores on one die by now not dual gpu cards if they where on 1 die the cards would be alot smaller and fit in most mid tower cases...
aschris87 2 years ago
nice and power!!.... but the price will burn my pocket lol... 2-4 cores is for me right now..:-(
silversRAY 2 years ago
Nice! As the time for release gets closer, more info should be coming out! Looking froward to all the info on this CPU, before I make a decision to buy or not! Judging by what I just saw, these CPU's should be AWESOME! Thanks for the leaked Specs! 5/5
marland66 2 years ago
of cores it will probly be hard core slow an bugged off the start
crazylikealbert 2 years ago
im getting this as soon as i can get my hands on it
DetroitPC313 2 years ago
yeah it should be awesome, but i can just imagine the price of it, i heard the extreme ed. might be around $1000 but i think thats still great considering the performance, i even heard that they over clock insane some people got it to 5.2ghz with water cooling !, not to sure if its true though, Thanks 4 watching !
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
amd has a new 12 core coming ou i think ! but nice !!!!
dragonlongrocks 2 years ago
Thanks, yeah its coming out in a little while, but i believe its more for a server then a pc
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
ur idiot AMD is putting out a 6 core in later 2010 AMD=poor people ATI=stupid people (some may disargge because they have DX11 and r faster right now but only 1 game is DX11 dirt 2 maybe more and ATI doesnt support 3D witch is amazing)
bizzy400 2 years ago
Ur the idiot. Amd people arnt poor. Its all a bout price vs performance . If i had a amd 965 and a 5870. And u had a i7 920 and a 5870 very little diffrance would be noticed
dragonlongrocks 2 years ago 2
I have a 955 and have a 5850 on the way to replace my 4890. I'm all for price/performance. Hell, AMD's top line is 200 vs. 1000. Real world performance, and gaming is hard to separate. That's why Windows 7 chose ATI features for DX11.
jstark069 2 years ago
yeah, id go with a amd system if ur on a budget or some thing like that, im just not that much of an amd fan, id rather pay a little more for some thing i trust sadly intel knows that and thats y there prices r so high lol, im not to sure but microsoft prefers amd & ati or intel & nvidia, Thanks 4 watching
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago
no sweat. I subbed ya.
jstark069 2 years ago
yeah i commented on ur ch. Thanks, subbed u
TylertheGeek28 2 years ago