@nokomarie1963 not only will it not be reopened, but nuclear power plants will never again be built this way and all other running RBMK nuclear power plants (11) will soon be decommissioned. the RBMK design doesn't meet international safety standards and although efficient and cheap to run has many proven safety flaws
@youngdones Normally, they will. But Ukraine need a good economic support from Europe, and with the actual crisis, it won't be easy. I hope the new sarcophagus will be built soon anyway, as you say, the current one is near to fall down... Tchernobyl danger still remain.
@lefoudelairgun C'est le Corium, un mélange de plutonium, d'acier et de béton. C'est en fait ce qui reste du coeur du réacteur après fusion de celui-ci. La personne qui a pris cette photo est décédée très rapidement.
The least they could do is spend some money and build a proper sarcophagus to stop all leaking and continual contamination and stop poisining the land and people around the globe , I think its totally disgusting and if they can't or don't do it someone else like Brussels should step in!!!!
Supposedly they will be finished with the new sarcophagus in late 2010 or early 2011. Then they will slide it onto its rails and over the destroyed power station. They have already receive $800 million in donations.
Hello tinytoes409, Yes indeed, they closed the whole plant in 2000. That's right. But still they do some maintenance at the sarcophagus, as good as they can, because they have little money and means to do that.
Hello Chuumpass, You're talking about 'still operative reactor's at the Tsjernobyl-plant? If so, you are mistaken. The Tsjernobyl-plant was closed in 2000.
Oh yes, I believe I read that as well, however, hundreds of workers are there doing tests and trying to secure the leaking sarcophagus. Do you know if that is true? Here in the states, I read that it closed completely in 2000!
yes, the vessel shown in that picture isn't the actual vessel from the 4th reactor (which is the one that exploded) but it looked that way, since there are 3 remaining reactor sections there which are still operative. i believe the one shown in this picture must be one of the three remaining reactors , most likely the third which is in the section of the building right next to the sarcophagus
It depends, In standard cloth gear yes, if you wanted to touch it or to clean it out, you would need to be in a hard suit lined with steel, lead. I have a piece of the nuclear lava the size of a pen tip, in a steel ammo box in a plastic container, it was given to my father who is a chemical engineer, by a scientist that went to inspect chyrnoble.
Merci de diffuser cette video. ce n'est que le début. Le risque que ca recommence et minime mais ca peu. Pensons surtout aux personnes qui vivent la-bàs et qui eux ont toujours des problèmes de santé.
Mais pensons aussi aux pays qui accepte les déchets nucléaires et qui seront touchés un jour ou l'autre par la remontés de ses toxines.Doit-on fermer les yeux encore longtemps? mais les chefs d'etats s'en foutent tant que se ne sont pas leurs familles! et c'est ca la mondialisation !
Mais non allons. Faut arrêter les annêries. Le nucléaire c'est l'avenir. Tu as envie de revenir au pétrôle et au charbon? Sans les centrales, dans quel atmosphère vivrions-nous?
Il faut continuer la recherche du nucléaire.
Quand aux énergies durables, ah, faites moi rire! Ok, c'est non polluant, mais aura-t-on assez d'énergie pour alimenter toute notre planète dans l'état actuel des choses? Hélas non. Donc on poursuit le nucléaire.
Va dire à ceux qui sont ruinés, rejetés de tous, aux enfants malades et déformés, aux malades à venir, que le nucléaire c'est l'avenir. Le magma incandescent aurait atteint la nappe phréatique, l'europe aurait été rayé de la carte et tu serais probablement plus de ce monde. Mais c'est bien, continue de faire l'apologie du nucléaire.
Ca c'est pire que tout. Et les centrales vont se faire de plus en plus nombreuses à travers le monde. Certe, ce ne sont pas de RMBK mais cela reste très préoccupant.
This has been flagged as spam show
how can you have those photos ?
aaamondieu 3 months ago
It's Chernobyl. And Chernobyl is in Ukraine, not Russia.
CorrineInChains 9 months ago 5
russian always made cheap crap..even nuclear reators
Dojocho 9 months ago
2:25 is that the elephant's foot after they shot it with the AK?
vids4chrome 10 months ago
The american think that the soviets will destroy the world, tipical american words.
Sorry my english.
From Brazil.
postairech 1 year ago
makes me sick to see how humans can really fuck everything up
musikTECH 1 year ago
@musikTECH
replace "humans" with "soviets"
Britishdude1 1 year ago
@Britishdude1 No, humans. The human race will destroy this earth.
musikTECH 1 year ago 7
@Britishdude1 mother fucker
tooropforce 1 year ago
thats fucked up
TheHolyKnight57 1 year ago
So, all really turned into so much molten slag. Will this facility ever be able to opened or must it be sealed and seald again as time goes on?
nokomarie1963 1 year ago
@nokomarie1963 not only will it not be reopened, but nuclear power plants will never again be built this way and all other running RBMK nuclear power plants (11) will soon be decommissioned. the RBMK design doesn't meet international safety standards and although efficient and cheap to run has many proven safety flaws
HolyGfunnies 1 year ago
@nokomarie1963 it will constantly througout the decades be sealed, and hopefully cleaned up. It will never re-open again
musikTECH 1 year ago
One of the most radioactive places on the planet earth
Crisgo3d 1 year ago
Aren't they building a new, larger sarcophagus over the current one that is structurally failing?
youngdones 1 year ago
@youngdones Normally, they will. But Ukraine need a good economic support from Europe, and with the actual crisis, it won't be easy. I hope the new sarcophagus will be built soon anyway, as you say, the current one is near to fall down... Tchernobyl danger still remain.
Misterknock 1 year ago
lefoudelairgun se quon voit c'est le plutonium fondu mélanger au graphite 5 mètre sous le réacteure
fochtondu57 1 year ago
what year was the sarcophagus built?
wrinklederph 1 year ago
@wrinklederph 1986 three months after the explosion.
halfpipefreak 1 year ago
@wrinklederph construction started a few months after the explosion
MrNeaNea 1 year ago
@MrNeaNea mox = pu + uranium tchernobyl reactor is at graphite gaz very inflammable
stef30666 10 months ago
C'est koi la sorte de melasse ke lon voit a partir de 2:25 sec?
lefoudelairgun 1 year ago
@lefoudelairgun C'est le Corium, un mélange de plutonium, d'acier et de béton. C'est en fait ce qui reste du coeur du réacteur après fusion de celui-ci. La personne qui a pris cette photo est décédée très rapidement.
VonDuesenberg 1 year ago
whats with the alien music.
SpamZoid 1 year ago
The least they could do is spend some money and build a proper sarcophagus to stop all leaking and continual contamination and stop poisining the land and people around the globe , I think its totally disgusting and if they can't or don't do it someone else like Brussels should step in!!!!
colmaster 2 years ago
Supposedly they will be finished with the new sarcophagus in late 2010 or early 2011. Then they will slide it onto its rails and over the destroyed power station. They have already receive $800 million in donations.
GunsOfThePhoenix 2 years ago
Many thank's for your reply and very interesting, if its to be completed so soon do you know if they've started work on it already? Thank's Michael
colmaster 2 years ago
people who wil build the sarchophagus will die from
atomic thing
3OnLyOnE 2 years ago
@3OnLyOnE Not necessarily.
RudeKarma101 1 year ago
Hello tinytoes409, Yes indeed, they closed the whole plant in 2000. That's right. But still they do some maintenance at the sarcophagus, as good as they can, because they have little money and means to do that.
Eikel66 2 years ago
Hello Chuumpass, You're talking about 'still operative reactor's at the Tsjernobyl-plant? If so, you are mistaken. The Tsjernobyl-plant was closed in 2000.
Eikel66 2 years ago
Oh yes, I believe I read that as well, however, hundreds of workers are there doing tests and trying to secure the leaking sarcophagus. Do you know if that is true? Here in the states, I read that it closed completely in 2000!
tinytoes409 2 years ago
6:15 is that what it looked like before the explosion?
WhiteDust56 2 years ago
yes, the vessel shown in that picture isn't the actual vessel from the 4th reactor (which is the one that exploded) but it looked that way, since there are 3 remaining reactor sections there which are still operative. i believe the one shown in this picture must be one of the three remaining reactors , most likely the third which is in the section of the building right next to the sarcophagus
CHUUMPASS 2 years ago
If in contact with molten nuclear sludge in pictures would it be fatal even in gear ?
67Eftw 2 years ago
It depends, In standard cloth gear yes, if you wanted to touch it or to clean it out, you would need to be in a hard suit lined with steel, lead. I have a piece of the nuclear lava the size of a pen tip, in a steel ammo box in a plastic container, it was given to my father who is a chemical engineer, by a scientist that went to inspect chyrnoble.
ExperimentalArmy 2 years ago
thats awesome, if i were you I'd get me a geiger counter and see if it's really effecting anything
desertman123 2 years ago
Hi , is that something you really want to have , if it leaks it could be dangerous for you?
colmaster 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a man swallowed one grain of sand from the site it killed him instantly
mastainventa 2 years ago
the glop in a lot of the pictures is a hardened sand/uranium mixture. Scientists exploring the sarcophagus named it "Chernobylite."
McLOVINMike 2 years ago
great, and nice background music
davidvaranoff 3 years ago
Merci de diffuser cette video. ce n'est que le début. Le risque que ca recommence et minime mais ca peu. Pensons surtout aux personnes qui vivent la-bàs et qui eux ont toujours des problèmes de santé.
Mais pensons aussi aux pays qui accepte les déchets nucléaires et qui seront touchés un jour ou l'autre par la remontés de ses toxines.Doit-on fermer les yeux encore longtemps? mais les chefs d'etats s'en foutent tant que se ne sont pas leurs familles! et c'est ca la mondialisation !
sab0279 3 years ago
Mais non allons. Faut arrêter les annêries. Le nucléaire c'est l'avenir. Tu as envie de revenir au pétrôle et au charbon? Sans les centrales, dans quel atmosphère vivrions-nous?
Il faut continuer la recherche du nucléaire.
Quand aux énergies durables, ah, faites moi rire! Ok, c'est non polluant, mais aura-t-on assez d'énergie pour alimenter toute notre planète dans l'état actuel des choses? Hélas non. Donc on poursuit le nucléaire.
AriesnoMu84 3 years ago
Va dire aux millions de biélorusses, ukrainiens et même tout simplement européens que le nucléaire c'est l'avenir.
Va dire aux centaines de milliers de liquidateurs qui ont 40 ans et qui en paraissent 80, dont la peau et les organes partent en lambeaux.
legomousse 2 years ago
Va dire à ceux qui sont ruinés, rejetés de tous, aux enfants malades et déformés, aux malades à venir, que le nucléaire c'est l'avenir. Le magma incandescent aurait atteint la nappe phréatique, l'europe aurait été rayé de la carte et tu serais probablement plus de ce monde. Mais c'est bien, continue de faire l'apologie du nucléaire.
Pauvre type.
legomousse 2 years ago
Very good pictures!Thanks for your good work!!
stubo666 3 years ago
Дураки, зачем под сарокофаг полезли, не сдохли сейчас - значит недолго осталось...
Familuar 3 years ago
Эти дураки заботятся о твоем здоровье...
DABIGBOOS 3 years ago
si les pompier avai pas arret l incendi sa aurai fai 30foi hiroshima et leurope aurai ete inabitable
popo73600 3 years ago
On fait pas d'omelette sans casser des oeufs! Que ça serve de leçon mais continuons à poursuivre la technologie nucléaire.
AriesnoMu84 3 years ago
Ca c'est pire que tout. Et les centrales vont se faire de plus en plus nombreuses à travers le monde. Certe, ce ne sont pas de RMBK mais cela reste très préoccupant.
Icrywtc 4 years ago