What's wrong with a windows guy using an iphone. I'm a windows person yet I still use ipods and iphones. It's not like if you use a windows pc you can't use Apple products. I don't see how the two are related to the point that someone using windows shouldn't be using an iphone.
mmm... well, it had booted into windows and the desktop was visible - you could have started clicking away if you really wanted - hence it was booted. Your view is too strict! Next you'll be saying, when the hard disk light stops flashing then you're happy! Also, did you not how it was installing new hardware, or finishing off an install? Perhaps if that wasn't the case it might have been faster??
is that an iPhone you're using? I find that kinda comical...
as far as the load, it actually loaded in more like 30 seconds, you aren't completely booted until all the processes are up and running, which some were still initiating when you stopped the timer.
btw, Windows2k on a P4 with 2gigs RAM, boots in <30 seconds every time (this is including bios loading which you didn't).
hmm you're right. that was actually quite a bad run because I also happened to be installing device drivers xD. The thing is unlike all the other reviews you're reading out there, I actually have worse performance with Windows 7 than Vista or XP so I've been reinstalling Windows 7 many times. For some reason, I just can't get the good performance results
Well Microsoft's goal for Windows 7 boot time is 15 seconds, and 25 seconds is nearly double that... hence too long. Of course, a there is a lot to take into account (such as computer specs). 25 seconds are far, far better than Vista's boot times
I was in a rush to film this, but I had actually had it boot up in 15 seconds before on 6801. Seems like the more you boot it, the faster it goes =\ Doesn't make sense, but ya, it really happened
I support the Author, it is possible. I just posted a video response.
Windows can do 8 point of resizing.
Win key + arrow key can do amazing shortcuts
Windows can do Utorrent (with advanced functionality)
Windows with K-lite codec pack can encode & play almost any video format
Windows has load of freewares.
wingbliss 1 month ago
I want a fresh start with Mac, sorry Windows.. even I used it since Win 98
thanhpluv 2 years ago
mine is 36.76 sec
ultimatetoturial56 2 years ago
Why this screen is different to me? My Windows 7 load the same screen that Vista... what's the problem? :/
Minha tela de inicialização não carrega essa aí... carrega a barrinha verde do Vista! Alguém sabe porque? :/
Evalber 2 years ago
it was 25.4 secs..no it's not under...it's over...change the title..it's misleading!!!
olre1 2 years ago
why is the windows guy using a iphone?
fan4mike 2 years ago
microsoft doesn't make the equivalent kind of phone. :p
Dillon1108 2 years ago
What's wrong with a windows guy using an iphone. I'm a windows person yet I still use ipods and iphones. It's not like if you use a windows pc you can't use Apple products. I don't see how the two are related to the point that someone using windows shouldn't be using an iphone.
animefreak00007 1 year ago
mmm... well, it had booted into windows and the desktop was visible - you could have started clicking away if you really wanted - hence it was booted. Your view is too strict! Next you'll be saying, when the hard disk light stops flashing then you're happy! Also, did you not how it was installing new hardware, or finishing off an install? Perhaps if that wasn't the case it might have been faster??
volatileacid 2 years ago
fuck the iphone the ipod touch fuck apple
GTAIVman 3 years ago
yeah!
ndrunkenTeddy 2 years ago
is that an iPhone you're using? I find that kinda comical...
as far as the load, it actually loaded in more like 30 seconds, you aren't completely booted until all the processes are up and running, which some were still initiating when you stopped the timer.
btw, Windows2k on a P4 with 2gigs RAM, boots in <30 seconds every time (this is including bios loading which you didn't).
IkeRay 3 years ago
hmm you're right. that was actually quite a bad run because I also happened to be installing device drivers xD. The thing is unlike all the other reviews you're reading out there, I actually have worse performance with Windows 7 than Vista or XP so I've been reinstalling Windows 7 many times. For some reason, I just can't get the good performance results
windows7center 3 years ago
That cant count because the processes are not included with Windows 7
vistarox 3 years ago
Well Microsoft's goal for Windows 7 boot time is 15 seconds, and 25 seconds is nearly double that... hence too long. Of course, a there is a lot to take into account (such as computer specs). 25 seconds are far, far better than Vista's boot times
WCCobra 3 years ago
I agree with jdawg, lol
fx500blaster 3 years ago
Umm , 25 seconds is kinda good for such os .
In windows 98, it didnt reguired much ram and all, thats why boosting was fast . :D
Like you noticed, when it went to desktop , it was finished loading . Booting, takes time for such os :P
Arcanangel 3 years ago
pretty fair test, but results vary with computer specs! Still, great video. Also inspired me to check out windows 7 and download it.
ralo23 3 years ago
WoWEE thats fast! but how come u have windows 7 ultimate and windows 7 in ur boot manager??
lbjfan408 3 years ago
Well, I guess they gave up on the 12 second boot time. 25 seconds is too long
WCCobra 3 years ago
I was in a rush to film this, but I had actually had it boot up in 15 seconds before on 6801. Seems like the more you boot it, the faster it goes =\ Doesn't make sense, but ya, it really happened
windows7center 3 years ago
You are probably seeing the Prefetcher in action.
NetRolller3D 3 years ago
Can you give your computer specs?
Starting completely from power button would give some extra seconds.
Wonder if Atom 330 with GMA 950 and 2gb Ram would work on it without glitches :(
How much ram and how many services will run on first boot?
Is original ISO 2,2gb ? Version 6801 was 2,7gb
Pr1Xs3L 3 years ago
CPU: Intel C2D e6750 2.66GhZ
RAM: 2GB Ballistix running at 600MhZ (or whatever it is 666, 650, cant remember)
Mobo: Gigabyte P35DS3R
HD: Samsung 640GB
windows7center 3 years ago
what are the requirements for the OS? i have a C2D 2.00GhZ, 3GB 650MHz DDR2 Memory, and a 320Gb SATA HD is that good enough?
fernank017 3 years ago
That's more than enough - it was shown to run successfully on systems with 1GB of RAM - even on netbooks.
BTW the RAM speed is 667MHz.
NetRolller3D 3 years ago
tyvm hopefully i get it as soon as it comes out!
fernank017 3 years ago
I got it to run on a 2.4ghz P4 with 2gigs RAM (pc3200).
IkeRay 3 years ago 4
ms removed the animated orb and made it just the boot screen, nice...
jlpogi23 3 years ago
is faster than 6801 ?
SSJ4G0KU 3 years ago
seems like it but could just be because it was a fresh build for me
windows7center 3 years ago
than witch one is faster:
vista ultimate or windows 7 build 6956
SSJ4G0KU 3 years ago
lol nice!!!!!gj
RapidReactionP 3 years ago