Added: 5 years ago
From: hartparr
Views: 384,279
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (68)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Beautiful antiques! Similar vapor

  • case built em good

  • RESPECT

  • @hartparr

    Actuly not 150 rpms it is 250 rpms, some of the larger engines would run 230-240 and some portables were 100-200 it depends on the engine

  • I wonder how they get it down from there, You'd think on that much of an incline, when you took it back down you'd expose the crownsheet. Unless they backed it down that is.

  • getting up is easy getting down is the hardest

  • how old is that thing? really awesome

  • @eroc2689 Its a 40 HP Case, probably manufactured around 1915.

  • @hartparr nah, those things were made around 1906

  • my grandfather has a Steam car its beautiful.

  • I LOVE WMSTR  LIFE TIME MEMBERS

  • lets see a modern tractor do that!

  • it's incredible how little horsepower this massive things. wonder what the torque was though. really wish we still used steam to this degree today. imagine how awesome it'd be with modern technology ^_^

  • @thedefinitive Its pretty easy to figure out the torque. Torque = 5252 x HP / Speed. This is a 40HP Case engine (Although that rated HP is less than what it can actually produce) it ran at a top speed of 150 RPM which means Torque = 1400 Ft. Lbs. Quite a bit. Today, most power plants are steam driven but instead of piston engines like this, they are turbine engines which run at a much higher efficiency. Sometimes as high as 40% which is better than today's car engines.

  • @hartparr thanks for the education ^_^

  • @hartparr people say these are bad for the air because they can SEE the smoke but a car motor is alot worse so why dont we go back to steam?

  • @metaldetectorguy i know stupid hippies, thinking gas is better than steam,

  • @hartparr Where did you get 5252 from?

  • @blibbax 5252 is a conversion factor. When James Watt decided upon a "horsepower" being 33,000 foot pounds per minute, he had to add that to make it come out equal. Otherwise Torque*RPM would be a measurement of power, just not in horsepower units. Just like how if you want to turn inches into centimeters, you divide by 2.54.

  • @hartparr thats why I love my steamers....they have been around sence the greeks build the frist out of wood and bronze...for a few hundred years now steam engines have had a 40 to 50% eff. and with all this techno crap we ant get over 25% with gas and diesel. Hell I have a 90 ford ranger that is running of a impact wrench at 80 psi liked to rear axle via 4" chunk-o-driveline I have 650 lbs of torque to work with and now no trany or engine wieght...yey for rednecking

  • @thedefinitive In Europe they're building modern steam locomotives. Check out the 60163 Tornado in England, it's all modern technology.

  • @KenMacMillan That's amazing. I'd love for it to catch on more

  • @KenMacMillan wish they did that here in the USA 

  • @metaldetectorguy Me too, I'd be happy if they just bought one & brought it over.

  • horsepower is a stupid measure of power.. if you took a car with several hundred Hp, geared it down and weighted it the same as that tractor, i guarantee that the tractor would win tug-o-war still

  • a normal car can struggle up a hill start like that, and that has 40hp.

  • If Gasoline, Petrol & Diesel run out we can allways go back to good ol' reliable steam!

  • Imagine that thing rolling over!

  • Massive torque.

  • wooooo thats NICE!!!

    i like how those old machines still work perfectly

  • yep only 40hp but 40hp of pure torque

  • @gunny556fly lol horse power and torque are 2 different things

  • @VentoDriver

    your wrong how do you get torque with an engine? answer is horsepower!

  • @gunny556fly then, how do you explain engines like this with nearly no hp but loads of torque...same thing for diesels they got lots more torque than hp....gas engines are the other way around normally more hp than torque..

  • @VentoDriver

    ok ok! you got me!  imstuck at this point!

  • @VentoDriver

    Jeez, didn't either of you go to school, power = torque x angular speed, wich means power= torque x rpm x 2 x pi/60. In Imperial units the formula gets a bit diferent but the principle is the same.

    A 40HP high rpm engine can be geared down to be a high torque engine, and a 40HP high torque engine can be geared up to be a high rpm engine. In the end, HP is what matters. If this steam engine would be geared to go as fast as a 40HP car, it would have the same low torque.

  • @gunny556fly torque is the power, hp is the rate at which the power is used.

    Horse power doesn't mean shit with out torque.

  • @BillTheTractorMan

    sigh okay!!! that was 4 months ago!

  • first of all i meant restore as in get running and bring back to original shape, rebuilding would mean repairing the engine which is part of restoring an engine and let me quote here "its a shame now it dosent do anything put sit and collect dust in his barn,"

    which means that it is not running currently its stored not to mention they said that it had problems so there you go

  • LOVE THIS!!

  • Steam power baby!!

  • Good video. Check out the video...

    25th Annual Jim Monaghen Antique Engine show 2008 on youtube. You will like it. :)

  • impressive

  • i love these tractors! they are old, but wonderful!

  • Americana

  • Thing is tho, isnt 40hp bout 5 or 6 nhp? cos if so then most of the british engines are more powerful than the colonials

  • 40 is low-midrange by American standards. Multiple manufacturers produced engines 3 and 4 times as powerful.

  • Another thing to remember, all Case steamers were rated under the actual HP by about ten percent, so actually, on the Brake, this one would be about 44hp.

  • a family friend of mine had one just like this and when he was at the fair startin it up, it blew up, he was killed along with a little girl, my gradpa also had one, after he pasted away he left it to my unkle and it has the same problem as my friends who blew up, its a shame now it dosent do anything put sit and collect dust in his barn, we used to ride it around when the whole family got togther, its a real shame

  • what kind of engine is it and would he be interested in selling it so that it could be restored

  • theres no way my family would let it go. that thing was my grandpas pride and joy. we have a big family somewhere along the line someone will restore it

  • it wasn't going to fall back....he was easing it up there. lol

  • Cool but it must have been pretty tough backing the engine back down the ramp.

  • you know it

  • defenetly the doggest looking steam engines

  • "J.I. Case engines are the only true hill climbers"

  • Dangerous! They'll do it ever year until one gets away and wipes out a bunch of folks.

  • it looked like it was gonna fall back a couple times

  • Yeah, but it's still pretty neat.

  • That's why they keep it clear behind the engine - everything does not need to be labeled "dangerous" that people are ignorant of.

  • hahah, id like to see a grey fergie try that!!

  • Want one!

  • THANKS,I ENJOYED THAT!

  • That's really cool, thanks for sharing

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more