Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (485)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't like the way the video blamed white male doctors for all this. It's mostly planned parrenthood that supports abortions which is headed by a woman named Cecile Richards.

  • @jackiescollectables - the video did not blame white doctors for everything. But you are correct about Planned Parenthood. Regards...

  • Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come visit my channel!

  • @pheromoneaction - thank you!

  • Love the video work nice keep them coming! When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Everyone should watch this video.

  • this video illustrates the brainlessness of abortion: of course abortion kills both genders, but it makes no sense to say "I believe in women's rights" when half of the aborted ARE women. it's a damning practice, and correctly stated "abortion needs no reason because it has no reason."

  • How much fun is this making video's .. When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Nice job on the video looks good. When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Nice job on the video looks good. When you have time come visit my channel!

  • Boooooo

  • I didn't watch the vid after i read the 1st 2 lines,...I got the ideal...very good...creative...peace and love

  • @s4a4v4y - thank you very much!

  • Good video, but I will politely complain about one point - not all children who were murdered by abortion would become scientists, doctors, presidents, etc. but that makes their lives no less valuable and their deaths no less gruesome and unjust. This video seems to suggest that only that people who are useful for society have value.

  • @EuropeanProLifer - thank you for watching and also for your comments, however, the intent of the video was not to suggest that only people who are useful to society have value. I am a pro-lifer and I do not know any pro-lifer who suggest that a baby only has value if they become useful to society. I did want to illustrate that we murder tomorrow's leaders, be they male or female, which is a form of national suicide, Regards...

  • i have one complaint... making it 7 WOMEN and not PEOPLE makes it sound very feminist. But great message.

  • @MercyDoesMakeup - Thank you for your comments!

  • Comment removed

  • Beautiful video! Food for thought

  • @SuperHappyPuppy

    I wasn't including myself when I said it, I'll take note thats all you had to say though.

  • @SuperHappyPuppy

    Ten months is a little late for a comeback. I am anti war, anti death penalty. Go ahead laugh and call me prude for being in control of my actions. Does that mean I can laugh and call you lower lifeform for asserting that since we are victims of animal instinct, we have no free will? Your talking points are a joke and you waste peoples time with them.

  • I wonder how many ppl who support abortion also believe in eugenics. We have a "soft" form of eugenics described in the video. Lots of posts talk like they would like to sort some "human weeds" themselves. I wonder if they understand that diversity works to keep genetics strong, and the MORE "eyes" on a problem the better(like the internet,for instance).

  • @SuperHappyPuppy that's kind of odd since many of the pro-lifers I know have many children...and they didn't find them in a cabbage patch.

    We are concerned with what they do afterward, when the sexual act is successful and they don't want it to be. When they have lied with their body -- giving themselves in sex and saying "yes I want children" but then killing the fetus -- this causes great pain and suffering to all involved.

  • @TheTroglodyteKing well, using your logic, i guess it would be just as correct to say that a member of a widely unknown native tribe in Mexico is simply not equal to an American. They have not seen our world, they have not contributed to our world and the way it works. They do not have a knowledgable connection with the rest of the world. Therefore, it's okay to kill them because they simply are not the equivalent of an American.

  • b-e-a-ut-if-ull that just says it all

  • @zilliz101 - thank you very much for your comments!

  • @SuperHappyPuppy If you dont want a baby then dont go having sex without a condom! If you know youre gonna get pregnant becasue youre having unprotected sex, why would you take out your stupid (and very much deserved pain) on a baby who just wanted to live a little (taken in a literal sense).

  • If you want to play possibilities, don't use bleach, you might kill the beginning of the next intelligent species. It's a nonsense.

  • @tommy5x bleach on what? if you mean germs or something, the germs are not human.

  • @FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7

    So what? They have to potential to evolve to a higher intelligence and hence give rise to people, if not human people. By the rationale of this video the argument I posit it's equally valid; which is stupid, so the premise is stupid, and therefore the argument made in the video is stupid.

  • @tommy5x the germ it's self will always be a germ. yes, it can reproduce and the ancestors can be other life forms, but that doesn't matter, the germ will always be a germ.

  • This video is speculative, self serving bullshit. Sorry to be so crass but it's true. Making these claims about the potential human being that a foetus could be come is meaningless, because given the total number of pregnancies and births which have thus far occured and that the people in the video's achievements have not been matched, it is more likely that the people here were never concieved, let alone aborted.

  • @tommy5x I think this video was just saying not so much who they could become, because we all don't know. The video is showing the stupid reasons and lies women are told who have abortions. And for many who have abortions who buy into the lies just think if a certain women would have listened we wouldnt have Mozart, but we might not of had Hitler.. but you know what? Since when did we receive the power to play God?? Ever hear of eugenics?

  • @SuperHappyPuppy Because we're not anti-sex, but Pro-smart. Our lesson to teach? Don't want the baby, don't have the sex. If you do have the sex, and a baby is conceived, you shouldn't have the right to kill it because a baby would "look bad on you". That's all it is. Some women care more about reputation than life. So sick.

  • it's all the mother's fault and some women of the generation......it saddens me that abortion takes place everyday thanks to the selfishness of a woman. One less scientist,one less writer,one less teacher,one less hero,one less story with no ending...........

  • I am a mother who live to regret I ever allowed this murder to take place.

    Doctors and authorities should be a shame of the act of removing a defenseless child from it's mother. Adoption shoul be the only way to say "no thank you" to a child!

  • Who Is Jane Doe?

  • I will join you in prayer for pro life. All life is precious. I read the comments on sex and love here and I think they are separate issues/opinions. Abortions takes so many lives! God Bless

  • Nevermind SuperHappyPuppy,

    He's just a troll with no real opinion.

  • maybe pro-choice should be called anti-life

  • Yes, the poor should not have sex. Why is that ridiculous? The entire purpose of sex is procreation, not recreation. Watch a damn DVD at night instead. Every single thing about sexual attraction and the act itself is set up to insure fertilization and to produce offspring. If you can't do the baking, stay out of the kitchen!

  • Not all women who are raped even WANT an abortion. Actually, most don't. It's their friends/relatives/boyfriends etc who want them to do it. And "fetuses" are aware creatures. They even remember voices and stories read to them while in the womb. You should try going to college. You'd learn a few things.

  • Actually, being college educated increases the chances that someone is pro-choice. It also increases their chances of being willing to perform oral sex. I guess that's a few of the thing they're learning, huh?

  • just pray for the pro life movement. who cares about the minor details? the important thing to remember is that this is not just murder. it's genocide.

    all i ask is that you pray for the prolife movement and stop worrying about petty details.

  • The difference is that consumer goods are something, while love is only an idea, a pretty pathetic one at that.

    No, if I was sure the human race would follow in my footsteps I might do that. Is that going to happen? I'll let you decide. Most likely I'd get my family at my funeral then all my ideas and everything I stood for would be promptly forgotten about.

  • I never had an argument.

    I really believe no one should have sex and we should let the human race die out, but thats out of the question.

    Love is a mixture of infatuation and the instinct for the survival of your species, nothing more. There is no deep meaning like everyone makes it out to be.

    A child's love can give me nothing, but say if my child becomes president. Woo-hoo its off to the white house for me. Goals give you things, love doesn't. Love cannot be a valid argument.

  • To tell you the truth. I despise most women, even though I am one myself. I don't give a crap if the woman's life is ruined because of the new baby. If I, all of a sudden, became pregnant, I would just have to accept it. If a woman is so ignorant to have sex without protection she deserves to have responsiblity shoved on her. and don't give me crap about rape, out of all abortions, at the most 2% of abortions were from rapes.

    Women should stop being such idiotic self absorbed fools.

  • Very harsh, but also very honest and there is a lot of truth in that. Sometimes people need to step up and say "Yeah, I did that, now I have to live with what's to come" and not hide behind some whining excuses saying how they 'deserve' to live with no worries.

  • so they should be given no opportunity at all? If they are still suffering through their live and want to end it, they can. Parents should not be able to control your life to the extent that they can end it if they see it fit.

  • An infant is also not aware of it's life. Does that mean it's ok to kill an infant? Believe it or not infanticide is also practiced in some countries, and one of them used to be the U.S.

    Hey, I'm not a "great achiever" either. What are the odds of becoming a celeberty, a renowned video game designer, a hostage negotiator, or the President of the United States? I'm just a simple bagger and cart pusher at a grocery store. But even then my life has as much value as yours does.

  • I know death is your choice. I believe that if someone of age wants to commit suicide, he should be given therapy if he wants it and cannot pay for it, but the end decision is up to oneself.

    Mothers are not some all powerful being that should be able to decide the fate of another human.

    I despise everyone over the age of 5 because of the creeps they become, but I'm willing to give the innocent a chance to not suck. I'm hoping one day, one of them won't annoy me like the rest of the human race

  • So we should kill off the people who won't become high achievers?

    so when does a baby "become" human. It certainly cannot love an hour after it is born, considered it is unlikely to remember the event anyway. So its OK to kill a newborn baby because it cannot express itself like you or me? try again dipstick.

  • Death is not your choice when you are in the womb. Also, as far as I know Barack Obama had some struggles as a child but he is now our first African-American President.

  • I'm whole-heartily against what you just said. Poorness =/= stupidness. I live in a trailer with my 7 brothers and sisters. None of us are stupid. My three older siblings are in college. I'm a junior in high school, on the honor roll and taking two college classes. I'm only saying this to prove a point. I thank my mother for not being a anti-life tit. You also cannot conclude that the mother is being kind to kill the child before it can "suffer". Life is your choice, not your parents.

  • can't read the text. no stroking the font with the opposite color?

  • any less valuable when it was inside my body as it is now. It is and always was HER LIFE, not mine, and to take it away regardless of how developed-taking away her opportunity to see the world, have a personal, knowledgeable connection with me, be loved, breathe, and contribute to the world and the way it works-would have been the most tragic and unfair act imaginable. A fetus is not = to a born child? Is an infant = to a toddler? A toddler to a teen? A teen to an adult? Who decides?

  • Why does the world not need that? Who are you to presume what the world needs or does not need (even at the expense of human life)? Your idea that those who should be aborted by default end up lacking proper guidance is incorrect. When I became pregnant with my daughter, her father wanted me to abort. We were young, poor, and living with relatives. I would not, because I recognized the importance of protecting her life. She is a happy 7 year old now, and there is no reason to think her life was

  • children are subject to poverty, abuse, lack of discipline, instruction, and education. Since they were wanted but still have to deal with all the things you've set as criteria for being aborted, should we dispose of them after they're born?

  • Who are you to suggest that working at McDonald's is so terrible? Passing judgment on the poor and uneducated and declaring them unfit for life is beyond presumptuous elitism. As I have said before, I am from a poor family, and being poor is by no means a definite sentence to a fate of ignorance and crime. You are connecting problems with no correlation. If schools and parents did a better job of helping instruct children and setting goals for them, this problem wouldn't exist. Even "wanted"

  • "stop the problem"? Well, you see, the only problem with that is that we're talking about human lives here. THEY are not a/the "problem", it's circumstances, and abortion isn't eliminating it, it's just killing them, which is creating another problem rather than stopping the one that's already there. Preventing conception, yes, that must be done, and abstinence education + contraception for those that need it is the only thing that will work, but killing isn't the answer at all.

  • Well, I would disagree with "bitch number five" as well, I think they should be legalized and taxed...but I still wouldn't have someone I disagree with killed.

  • That's ridiculous. Have you studied human growth and development? By the end of the embryonic period, the heart is already beating, circulating blood it's made itself throughout its blood vessels and full 5 segments of its brain, spinal cord, gastrointestinal tract, etc...

    You're just ignorant of human growth and development. Oh well.

  • See, that would be a problem with the police and social services rather than the kid itself. Rather than killing the kid for the world's failings, let's work on improving the world, shall we?

    Ah, so it's kind of instinctual...Well, perhaps it's time for an adaptation? I've found moving inland to be quite a positive thing for my family. First my parents did it (we were poor when we came here, by the way), and now I've moved back with my husband and our children. Things look better every day.

  • Do you have stats on what you said about people in coastal areas living longer? I've never heard that before.

    I've lived in a crowded coastal city before. I've been poor, as well. At the worst time in my life, I'd still rather be alive than to have been killed by my parents, for any reason, no matter how just they might've thought it to be.

    It's a turn of phrase. And actually, in Japan, a person's life span includes gestation. Saying "My son's due to be born in January." isn't incorrect.

  • It is a human, only in the early stages of development. I don't consider my son's life worth less just because he's an infant and can comprehend less than myself. He's a human being, regardless of his capacity for thought and learning, and should be afforded rights as such, just as ANY human should be. The world is not overpopulated. Where do you live? There's plenty of room where I am right now. It's not any pre-born human's fault that people tend to congregate around coastal areas.

  • But Hitler, just like every other human (including developing humans) was entitled to certain human rights before his rise to power as an abusive dictator. The thousands of humans killed by abortion every day will never have those rights, and have had the most fundamental right-the right to life-taken from them at the earliest stages thereof. Our children cannot be afforded the same rights we gave even to a man like Hitler?

  • Imagine the potential.

  • thanks for posting the video. it's sad, but true. i went through it against my will a couple years ago and to this day it bothers me to think what that child would be like today and thinking about it saddens me and i regret going through it. I was about 1 month preg when i went through it and i will NEVER go through with it again! it's horrible!! it's up to god to decide when its time for someone to go.

  • somebodysangel99, you are welcome!

  • This is a sad story and I feel deeply for you. Turn you eyes towards Jesus for forgivness, healing and salvation because he is the only one that can offer these things. God Bless

  • thank you so much. god bless you.

  • Imaginary friends are fun, aren't they?

  • Murder + Baby = Abortion.

  • Idiots + Laws + Religion = Loss of Rights

  • What about the childs right? You Liberal idiots care only for yourselves and your so-called 'rights'. Pro-Choice/Abortion/Murder (cause lets face it, they all mean the same thing) is a selfish perspective and one that is an abomination to the Lord

  • Plus, you completely ignore pro-life atheists like myself.

  • Hmm..sorry about that.

    Here's the alternate equation then:

    Idiots+Laws+Lack of Rationality = Loss of Rights

  • How is being anti-abortion irrational? Personally, I see the opposite viewpoint as being HIGHLY irrational, in that, it is horribly inconsistent. The government has no federal law which allows a woman to harm anyone else for a natural consequence of sex...other than in the case of abortion. The federal government actively protects the health and welfare of children...except in the case of abortion. Abortion makes no sense. I do not include it in my list of "rights" I should have as a woman.

  • Starting out using the word "idiots"...oh my, aren't you just too respectful.

  • its up to parents to support a young adult to make the right choice, and let them know they will have their support and not be castout to the streets,

  • Very poignant, and very true. It reminds me of a woman from my town who had five children and a degenerative disease. Before she was diagnosed, she made a habit of telling her youngest child he was a mistake and shouldn't have been. Guess which of her five kids took care of her when she could no longer take care of herself?

  • HammerofHeretics, thank you very much for your excellent comments!

  • Hammer, You said "It reminds me of a woman from my town who had five children and a degenerative disease. Before she was diagnosed, she made a habit of telling her youngest child he was a mistake and shouldn't have been. Guess which of her five kids took care of her when she could no longer take care of herself?" Im sorry but the stupidest reason to have a kid is for the purpose of caring for you when you are old. Children shouldn't be conceived for a "use".

  • Obviously the woman in my story did not conceive for that purpose. In fact, until she got sick, she lamented that that child was a mistake. However, when she got sick, that child turned out to be the one who loved her most. This is a tremendous object lesson for those who arrogantly believe that they can judge in advance whether a person should live or die. We don't know what a child may do in her life and we have no right to take away her life under the pretense that we do.

  • Does a decent job of driving home the idea that destroys lots of potential, but makes its case purely through speculation. Pro-choice types could just turn around and say: "well socioeconomic stats prove these people will probably not have good lives and will grow up to be criminals/drags on society." A better tact is to show (it is not difficult) that abortion has not improved our society, and has in fact, increased the very ills it was supposed to solve.

  • "A better tact is to show (it is not difficult) that abortion has not improved our society, and has in fact, increased the very ills it was supposed to solve."

    Such as...

  • To answer Orishas2000's question, a good ill abortion icreased would be economic meltdown. This whole country is in a financial crisis, yet we are wasting money to fund international abortions and China's One Child Policy. And if FOCA is signed it will force catholic hospitals to either perform abortion or shut down, and because they will refuse to perform abortion, they will be shut down. How will that help the poor? How will that boost our economy?

  • Sorry for the late reply, didn't know.

    "ill abortion icreased would be economic meltdown"

    No, funding for "international abortions" is no where near that level.

    "FOCA is signed it will force catholic hospitals to either perform abortion or shut down"

    Isn't only for when the mother's life is in danger? It's not like their going to turn catholic hospitals into abortion clinics. Still, a little far reaching for my taste.

  • "because they will refuse to perform abortion, they will be shut down. How will that help the poor? How will that boost our economy?"

    You expect abortion to boost the economy? In terms of quality of life for the poor, abortion seems to provide a useful service for obvious reasons but it is probably neutral in terms of economic growth for reasons just as obvious.

  • Child abuse, neglect, and murder rates have all increased since Roe vs. Wade.

  • And the temperature of the Earth has risen while the number of pirates on the high seas has decreased, obviously pirates kept the Earth cool.

    Even if what you were saying were true, correlation does not mean causation. Are you honestly suggesting that Roe vs Wade has caused more child abuse, neglect and murder to happen?

  • orishas, don't worry about the reply being late.

    $37 trillion each year go to funding abortions and our President is using taxpayer money to fund abortion in other countries while things in our country are already in bad shape. Even if I am wrong about abortion causing an economic crisis, then I can at elast say it is certainly not making it any easier. If our country is already stuggling to keep itself together then why waste money on international abortions?

  • orichas, no FOCA will force Catholic hospitals to perform abortion on demand. You could not refuse if you are a doctor.

    If a family really could not raise a child then they could put it up for adoption.

  • "FOCA will force Catholic hospitals to perform abortion on demand."

    I thought it was only to save the life of the mother. If what you say is true then I oppose FOCA, such a measure is too extreme.

    "If a family really could not raise a child then they could put it up for adoption."

    Ignoring all the costs of pregnancy, what do you think would happen to the adoption system if every fetus that would have been aborted came to term and was put for adoption?

  • So because the adoption system/foster care/child services system(s) need overhauling, we should allow the killing of those who would be most likely to be affected? If there is a problem with the education system should we start burning books?

  • False analogy, but at least you admit that such a situation would be disastrous for all involved.

    I wonder, what is the plan after outlawing abortion, forcing reluctant mothers to care of their unwanted children? Mandatory adoptions for all? Warehousing and rearing by the state?

  • Well, let's say it would be a poor environment for books. The people who take the books will be far too rough with them while they read them, and they'll be worse for wear. Does that mean that rather than let the books be read, they should be piled up and burned as they come out of the factories?

    How about fixing the broken adoption system, where kids sit in unfit foster homes of peole who see them as dollar signs while those who really love and want them are forced to wait for years on end?

  • Well, you avoided my question but we can discuss that later.

    Concerning your point, if you think our adoption system is broken now, what about when we increase the number of children put up for adoption ten fold? How many of those children will ever know a family? How many will suffer from the effects of poverty, poor education, and violence? The childcare system would have to become bigger than our department of defense to even begin to attempt such a feat.

  • The answer isn't MORE government, it's less. Government oversight is what has gotten us where we are now. Let private charities handle more children in need of homes. As it stands, the restrictions (GOVERNMENT restrictions, mind you) are so insane, it's a wonder ANYONE is allowed to adopt, by design. They're making money off of these children, and we need to end it. Have you ever owned a large breed dog? Can't adopt. Smoked/smoke cigarettes? No kid for you. How many homosexual couples need kids?

  • "$37 trillion each year"

    Source? That's 10 times the federal budget and Bush had a ban on oversea abortion funding for all eight years he was in office, so how does this figure make any sense?

    "using taxpayer money to fund abortion in other countries"

    Our economy is still on the bend and we still give aid to other countries now, what's your point? Do you want to stop giving aid to other countries?

  • Apologies. the $37 trillion is actually the total amount since 1973, not each year. My mistake I do have a source which I will PM you.

    Of course we should continue to use our money to send aid, but abortion is not aid work. We should be giving food, medicine, and clothing to poor countries. Why waste money on abortion?

  • "We should be giving food, medicine, and clothing to poor countries. Why waste money on abortion?"

    Women in poor in countries who are undereducated, not allowed to work and subject to rape could benefit from abortion but, to be honest, I am not well versed in how foreign aid is funneled into abortion, so I can't comment on how effective or ineffective such a policy was or how that money was utilized. If that money was used to fund abstinence only sex-ed then I could say it was wasted.

  • Rape is a horrible crime but we can't punish the child for what it's father did. The one who should be punished is the one who raped the woman.

    I honestly do not find any problem with abstinence. Practicing abstinence greatly reduces any chance of getting an STD and there was studies that show that those who wait until marrige to have sexual intercourse are far less likely to be divorced.

    Did I ever PM the source of the $37 trillion? I may have gotten sidetracked. Apologies.

  • "Rape is a horrible crime but we can't punish the child for what it's father did."

    So you would force every woman who was raped and became pregnant to have the child?

    "I honestly do not find any problem with abstinence."

    Abstinence-only education has been proven much less effective than comprehensive sex-ed at reducing unintended pregnancy and STD transmission, leading to greater rates of both. It's a waste of money.

  • it not the babies fault why sentance the baby to death

  • So you would force every woman who was raped and became pregnant to have the child?

  • I loved it. I hate abortion.

  • PivotMaster53787, thank you!

  • I liked the concept of this video - you are on the right track. Were this a TV advert, th "people who will never be" theme would surely resonate.

    A few flaws in presentation, tho:

    1. Grammar errors detract from the presenation. Grammar and spell check...!

    2. The white text was difficult to read on light backgrounds.

    3. The pacing was a little slow in several points.

    Overall, I liked the video- it represents a good pro-life message.

    God bless!

  • Obama = FOCA FOCA = Most Hypocritical Bill of our time!

  • Beautiful idea! Thank you!

  • HisNewCreation, thank you very much!

  • this was an excellent video.=]

  • LiLADy05, thank you very much!

  • obama = baby killer

  • haha thats awesome!

    good one. :)

  • So how many unaborted people have cured AIDS and Cancer?

    Now how many unaborted people have murdered, raped, maimed, tortured people while doing drugs and spreading diseases?

  • abortion is murder

    pro-abortionists are killers

    pro-choice are liars and anti-woman

  • and i'll tell ya this i'm no saint i know for sure i'm not hell i've had premarital sex before but i've come to realize i've been really sinning all along. i'm a sinner i know this but i've never gotten a girl pregnant and even if i did i'd tell her to keep the child and your wondering well hows it your decision simple we both had sex together and if my biology serves me right my sperm helped create that life so i believe i have a say

  • People can choose for themselves. I'm Christian AND Pro-Choice. I think attempting to force Christian morals on other people is ridiculous. Let people live their lives they way they want. One of my favorite messages in the Bible ( and in life) is ti treat others as you want to be treated. Would you want someone trying to force their beliefs on you? Of course not. If you're against abortion, then don't have one. It's really that simple.

  • wow you read one sentence in the bible congratulations maybe you should read the rest and find out what your doing is wrong and stop being a half ass christian. what is your reason for being pro choice anyway i'd like to know.

  • Thanks for judging me. I'm not a half-ass Christian and that's an extremely horrible thing to say to someone. I live my life for God, I just don't believe that everyone else should have to.

    I respect people's choice to privacy. I, personally, would never have an abortion. But I don't think I have to right to condemn those who do. Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. I think abortion should be used only as a last choice, but should be legal. Remember coat hangers?

  • your right that is a horrible thig to say, and no i'm not judging you. but how can you support abortion and claim to be a christian. you know its wrong yet you do it anyway. its murder and you know it.. it shouldn't even be a choice. thats why we have adoption and yeah coat hangers are terrible.  again i say for the most part its people wanting to have sex without the consequence. rape and incest are a smaller case compared to people just having promiscuous sex.

  • And just so you know while you were so busy not forcing your views on others and respecting peoples privacy obama now just reversed the ban on paying federal funds to go toward abortions in other countries. so now for all you people angry about bush sending all our money to go to a war in two other countries you've allowed for obama to use our money for war against the womb in every other part of the world.

  • "let people live the way they want."

    then why is murder illegal? why should that be illegal and not abortion?

    you're christian and pro choice. congratulations.

  • would u like to be slaughtered when u r in ur most vulnerable form? we r fighting to save lives not convert people!

  • "Treat others the way you want to be treated". These words don't justify abortion. I mean no offence toward you but abortion is a huge mistreatment of the baby and we should treat the baby with love bvecause we also want to be loved, right? How can we treat a baby like just a blob of tissue?

    Jesus also said "What you do to the least of my brothers, you do to me" Of course we can't really abort our Lord physically but He made it clear any offence we do to others is also against Him.

  • Very powerful! Well done...

  • nucleophilic03, thank you very much! regards...

  • this is amazing. you hit it on the head expecially the last one with the grandchilrren too, and their children. thank you, thank you thank you.

  • diggit03, thank you very much for your comments! regards...

  • amazing vid! God Bless!

  • syd453lm, thank you very much for your comments!

  • Assassination

    Baby killing

    Obscenity

    Rabbles shame

    Terrorism

    Infanticide

    Obstetrics

    Nasty genocide

  • God bless this video

  • Imperialnews, thank you very much!

  • Lovely Video!! I love that you really brought to life the "What might your baby become?" question.

    And to everyone who has issues with Pro-life videos, I'll simply say that all pregnancies are terminated, it's a matter of whether at the end you have a baby or a bleeding heap of body parts.

    Abortion does not make you "not pregnant" it makes you the mother of a dead baby.

  • Voyagerlover13, thank you for your comments!

  • Thanks for the outlook on what would happen if abortions didnt happen. Who these people would have become. It goes to show that there is a place for everyone in this world.

  • Sweetheartohmy, thank you for your comments!

  • God loves you, no matter what you have ever done. Abortion, lust, pride...doesn't matter to God, were all evil at heart. We all need forgiveness through the shed blood of Jesus in order to be forgiven. God let Himself be killed so that we might have abundant life. I encourage you friend to be open to God's love and receive His forgiveness by believing in Jesus for the payment of your sin. The bible says that the love of Jesus is beyond our knowledge...just receive it like a child

  • Thanks so much for your wonderful videos. After reading some of the comments here, I understand more clearly the distiction between being a light of the World and being in darkness.

    God Bless you!

  • Jcabartlett, thank you very much for your comments! Regards...

  • your very welcome. It disturbs me that so many women have become so "self centered in their own lives and would discard the lives of a baby (with no choice) I am sure I will get many thumbs down again.

    I know there are certain cases (like rape & incest)that would be so much harder on a Mom, but killing a baby is not right in God's eyes. (Plain & simple)

    Life is precious....even the pro choice has to admit that...their own Moms chose life.

  • No thanks for posting. I recently found out my Aunt had gotten pregnant five times. She only had two children. She had three abortions. At first I felt angry, cause I always wondered why my family was so small!

    I feel sorry for her. The guilt and scars from those abortions has left my 60 year old Aunt to go into a mental hospital yet again! Its driven her crazy!! Planned Parenthood targets Black and Latina women! Check out my video on abortion!

  • my heart goes out to your Aunt. when I was young I did an "open adoption" & i now talk with my daughters new mom every other day & get pictures at least 3 times a year. Julie (adoptive mom)...says she will tell her when the time is right" Lydia is 12 years old now, & her & Julie have been putting a scrap book together about me

    Lydia is the best thing in the world, a precious child, & to all those who disagree with her life or babies for abortion , you are crazy...there is hope

  • sounds good

  • Christians should not forget that we have a duty here on earth to do His work, too.

    In this election we have a choice between a Christian hero who has picked a true Christian woman for his VP --

    and a left-leaning enemy of Christians, who has supported every late-term and partial-birth abortion law.

    A woman's right to choose does not include MURDERING babies.

    Praise Him with song -- but spread the word to VOTE in November!

  • How'd that work out for you?

  • pro life is pro women!!!

  • i wouldnt say mentally unstable but im still pro life

  • I don't think that is fair.

    They may not see life with a proper respect but mentally unstable is not a fair label.

  • Anyone willing to rip a fetus' limbs off and crush it's skull is a total nut job! Both the mother and the doctor!

  • How mad are you that they ended Saddam Hussein's LIFE, or all those people that where put to death. How mad where you when their LIFE was ended.

  • theoneonly2, um, what are you talking about?? We're talking about INNOCENT babies, not people who've destroyed other people lives and murdered. HOw can you argue when you can't even stay on topic??

  • I was actually talking to sexymodelboy Not you. Keep acting as if yu care about LIFE when you know damn well you don't Lynnette1987.

  • I don't give a damn WHO you were talking too. I was talking to YOU! And don't tell me what I do and don't care about. U don't even stay on topic when you argue so u need to be more concern about what you NEED to be doing!

  • Like I said Keep acting as if yu care about LIFE when you know damn well you don't Lynnette1987.

  • how is human life off of topic when the topic is abortion? a baby means more to you then a teenager? thier both human even if that teenager is about to walk into a clinic pregnant and walk out not, still human theoneonly2 did stay on topic!

    plus a baby is born a fetus is in the womb or i guess your right and the dictionary is wrong!?

  • The sanctity of life should not be conditional...well said...a lot of thick-minded people would do well to remember that

  • sexymodelboy, if that's the cast, you're not too stabled yourself. Go leave comments where people actually LIKE you. Thanks!