Added: 4 years ago
From: mediacollections
Views: 11,018
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (156)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @moonbat42 On a private radio/ television show, an individual has every right to screen callers and filter out those who, for whatever reason, are not wanted on the air. Not really a freedom of speech issue; I suppose you should learn such things before you attempt to 'school' people on the constitution.

  • @starraider113 the point i was making is that grandstanding on youtube is pointless since even if your claims are accurate you have no way to back them up. he may have been asking for insults but chances are he's not gay, so your fag comments are more likely of offend innocent people that are just looking through the comments then they are to offend him. lastly, i give you props on the Yamaha Raider, that's a sweet fucking bike, and i wish i had one. way better then what those fags ride ;-)

  • @starraider113 according to several definitions i've seen, you fit the definition of "fag" perfectly.

    Fag (făg) n.

    1. An extremely annoying, inconsiderate person most commonly associated with Harley riders.

    2. A person who owns or frequently rides a Harley.

    for someone who talks about wrapping a bike chain around people so much, you have an unusual number of tron videos on your channel. it appears that you're not who you say you are. now go running home to jack off you bigoted little loser.

  • The reason someone would say the towers would collapse before the fact is not so much because steel structures had done so before due to fires (though a couple may have), but because in the aftermath of the 1st WTC attack, many engineers concluded that due to the construction methods involved, similar bombs in upper floors would indeed cause a pancaking collapse. Down low, the first attack hit at the strongest part of the buildings. A CNBC Geraldo show guest noted this long prior to 911.

  • Nothing the caller said is true. Rudy G never said that. Steel structured buildings have collapsed due to fire twice before 9/11.

  • we jews are very clever hehehehehhehehehehhehehe

  • Realize that all of the comments on this page that are given "thumbs up" are all slurs? This is what we're up against, folks. They're a bunch of uneducated ideologues who have no other argument than saying that the opposition are "faggots".

    Keep it up! You're only deterring your own people.

  • People like Jonah Goldberg are the reason why the quality of reporting is low.

  • Jonah Goldberg is an idiot.. far left or far right conservative or liberal. republican or democrat its all the same George bush is Obama both are ran by corporations, their all puppets there is no socialistic reform its all just modern day fascism

  • Goldberg is great. His book is a must read along with "America Alone" by Mark Steyn. The tinfoil hat wearing "truthers" are complete idiots and shouldn't be taken seriously.

  • Now that a Democrat is the President. These Lunatic 9/11 Truthers have toned down. Just goes to show the 9/11 Truth "Movement" is only about Politics and not about scientific facts.

  • Goldberg isn't a zionist, he's just an asshole, like his whore mother.

  • @loonmaniac

    wow you sound like a true nazi

  • If I had a time machine, I'd send Goldberg to 1936 Munich.

  • Jonah Goldberg is a jewish zionist, the same criminal group that did the job on 9/11.

  • Like I said, there are points where they overlap, and I agree that social and economic policies can affect the other indirectly, but the core policies are almost always either, exlcusively or predominantly, social or economic in nature and scope.

  • Social and Economic policy, while overlapping in places are very much seperate.

    Universal suffrage is an example of a social policy that does not directly affect the economy. Any knock-on effects would only be because those previously unable to vote were electing people with different economic policies.

  • I think you've replied to the wrong post.

  • he is one of the New Nazi's- only a fool thinks 9/11 wasn't an inside job

  • I simply cannot understand why Goldberg is still invited to give his opinion on *any* topic. He's been a neocon cheerleader throughout the whole Afghanistan / Iraq fiascos, and his chief argument over the years has been slander.

    Notice the same pattern here. He doesn't address the issue, but calls the caller names and brushes it off as inconsequential.

    2300 years after Aristotle taught us not to, and we've got guys on the TV using ad-hominem as their primary tactic...

  • For those who haven't seen it yet, this clip is must viewing. On YouTube-

    "Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo"

  • thats a good video but the zombies like jonah goldberg are too brainwashed.

  • One tedious clown meets another on live TV.

  • wish we could screen these guys out

    well i wish i could bring back my dead countrymen

  • wish we could screen jonah goldberg out of the gene pool

  • JoAnn Goldberg - "another 9-11 truther, there must be a way to screen these guys out."

    so much for freedom of speech eh JoAnn? why is it that you republicans hate our constitution and bill of rights so much?

    patriot act, wiretapping, spying, military tribunals act, keep your mouth shut and dont ask questions about 9-11.

    but hey, constitution is just a piece of paper like George W.M.D Bush put it once so eloquently.

  • @moonbat42 This is exactly what freedom of speech is all about. You have the right to say whatever you want but others have the right to refuse to let you use their platform to say something. You are right about the patriot act and that stuff but saying they should screen a caller is not violating anyone freedom of speech.

  • Goldberg is a pawn!

  • jonah "Bill" Goldberg is just another fuckin peanut brain republican that hates facts.

  • @DestructerX haha this dude proves that you can speak as sanely and smartly as you want, but if you're backing a dead horse you'll still be clueless

  • @why760nitro

    You are a faggot.

  • @why760nitro

    Lol! fuck off you gay ass republican fag! I'm not a liberal, I am an independent that STRONGLY HATES the republican party and people like you that vote for them. Go suck your mommy's nipples now and ask her if she can potty train you, limp-wristed faggot.

  • @why760nitro

    lol! you are a queer. You love that republican tube steak up your ass with a side of white gravy. Just be careful so you don't go blind in the process, fuckin faggot, lol!

  • @DestructerX You fucking faggot. Stop leaving shit on people's channels and then not even allowing them to comment you back, or even message you. What a flaming coward you are. Take that big black cock out of your throat and look around you, you're an idiot.

  • He looks like the son of the Republican operative whore who bragged she sucked Lyndon Johnson's and Hubert Humphrey's dicks, and who told Linda Tripp to tape Monica Lewinsky and save the cum-stained dress. Like mother like son.

  • You see, comments like this 5th grade subliminal filth you just came up with belongs in your liberal filthy books. Why don't you group up!

  • Tripe from a stupid boring twerp.

  • Yes, I have to admit that Jonah disappointed me with this one. He does not just disagree with this caller's line of questioning; he disagrees with this caller's right to ask his question, as evinced by his remark that such callers should be "screened out."

  • "he disagrees with this caller's right to ask his question"

    Oh, what utter nonsense! He doesn't disagree with his right to ask, he's a free agent himself and does not take such calls seriously. If Jonah were THE GOVERNMENT, his refusing to take the call would involve the caller's rights. Jonah is not the government, he's a free citizen.

    That guy who called is absolutely free to ask his anywhere he likes; and Jonah Goldberg is absolutely free to ignore him. Learn what liberty IS, willya?

  • What a jackass, how was that not a serious question.

  • Maybe because there were people in WTC7 that were predicting that it was coming down. That is where the infamous "We are going to pull the building" came from.

    If the mayor did misspeak and say "towers", and feed the truthers with another in a long list of irrefutable proofs, that doesn't mean Mr Goldberg has to put up with them.

  • "There must be some way to SCREEN these types of callers out!" Jonah doesn't like to be confronted by truthful questions. It means he might have to concoct an intelligent answer. Jonah doesn't like people speaking their minds, either. Freedom of Speech was only intended for Jonah and his pals, NOT YOU PEONS.

  • Wake up people. It's not Left versus Right, it's liberty versus totalitarianism. There's a global elite pushing global fascism and they're doing it through the lame duck presidents they install and the terrorism they create. Goldberg should be smart enough to work this out, but I fear he's part of the problem.

  • " It's not Left versus Right, it's liberty versus totalitarianism." Acutally...it is Left v.s. Right. It's self evident to anyone not indoctrined in liberal elitism that the further left you go the stronger the government gets, the less civil liberties you have, the growth of government tramples the growth of private industry. As you head right on the scale, you redue government size, citizens secure more idividual liberties, but yet you people claim at some point of shrinking governemnt...

  • ...as we go to the right, then all of a sudden out of nowhere you get a totalitarian type atmostpehere??? Wrong!!! The extreme lef-wing is national socialism and international socialism....the extreme right wing is Anarchy, where governement has shrunken to the point of no existance.

    These global elites are international socialists promoting corporate, state-run capitalism. Why do you think the U.S., England, and others are using the economic crisis as an excuse to nationalize???

  • KEEP IN MIND, when I say they are using "corporate, state-run capitalism" I should say "Corporate Socialism" but I think that term is too easily misuderstood.

  • Jonah's "liberal fascism" is an amazing book.. but you don't need to read it, just search for his speech on it here

  • If a question is stupid enough, there is no good answer. Caller says, "There is no historical precedent for any building to collapse due to fire." This is complete nonsense. Every structural engineer knows that steel framed buildings collapse when a fire is severe enough. Every fireman knows this. This is the reason all building codes require fire insulation on structural steel to give time to control the fire or evacuate before collapse. The question is stupid because the premise is ignorant.

  • You might occasionally get a structural collapse in a factory but no highrise has ever collapsed demolition-style on its footprint from buckling steel. That would create an irregular or partial collapse, not a demolition style collapse. The fires on 911 were just not hot enough or sustained enough. And besides, what were all those explosions heard by so many witnesses?

  • GoCo77

    Perhaps you can come to my page and tell me how the towers fell if not by the fire and impact of a jubo jet

  • stupid question.  stupid answer.

  • The Neocon Goldberg was squirming because the fraudulent approved version of 'great moment in history', 'the Day the World Changed Forever', the neocons' raison d'etre, was being exposed. Note how he said: There must be some sort of way of screening these people? We getting a little fascist now Jonah?

  • Well there is not really an educated way to respond to someone who believes this sort of thing. I suppose the moon landing was fake, aliens rigged the 2000 election and Bush blew up the levees in New Orleans after conjuring up Katrina using Karl Rove's magic gauntlet because their 9/11 didn't kill enough black people. Incendentally, that same gauntlet created the magic bullet that killed JFK AND MLK 5 years later. Makes a good narrative but seriously? Seriously?

  • If you learned a little history you would see that governments, directly and indirectly, do commit atrocities against their own people for 'greater political objectives'. Historically, intelligence agencies carry out things called 'black operations' and 'psyops', which often involve terrorism or murder. If you don't know history, you live in an intellectual vacuum.

  • Sure, such operations do exist but do you really believe Bush and/or the government had something to do with 9/11? I mean if such allegations were true, don't you think they would have already been prosecuted? It's not like you don't have several hundred people on Capitol Hill who don't want to see Bush disgraced or anything i.e. the Democratic Congress. It makes for a good story but to believe the government had anything to do with that is ludicrous.

  • It's really not so ludicrous, "false flag" operations have been used for centuries as pretexts for war etc. I urge you to do a lot more research before making up your mind. With respect WAKE UP!

  • Why hasn't this movement raised an armed rebellion?  Why do the same people who support this movement normally support gun control? Simple enough, right?

  • People did try to prosecute but they were shut down. You have no idea of the level of corruption in the US administration.

  • Perhaps you should study some history yourself. When the government attacks its own people, the people don't turn around support gun control. They riot or raise an armed rebellion. The very fact the movement hasn't taken to armed rebellion speaks volumes about their character if it were even true.

  • I'm not afraid to say that I believe and would suggest that 9/11 was an inside job! ;)

  • Actually dasloan, conspiracies do exist. You can be charged for committing a crime and conspiring to commit a crime. And in making a stupid statement like 'aliens rigged the 2000 election' is an insult to the thousands of people who had votes stolen by the officials working for that corrupt little dictator Jeb Bush.

  • Ah, yes... the "stolen" election. It was eight years ago, Obama won, get over it.

    As far as conspiracies go, sure, there is such a thing, but most of the time they occur in Tom Clancy books and Oliver Stone movies; as the great Freud once said: "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar". I.e., maybe, as crazy as this must sound, but maybe the government is ACTUALLY telling us the truth that the Towers were destroyed by Islamo-Fascists, like all the evidence points to.

  • No conspiracies occur all the time in political party strategy meetings, in board rooms, in bar rooms ... everywhere where people meet together to plan an activity, whether good or bad. Try American fascists - they actually exist.

  • You're absolutely right. American fascists do exist... read Jonah's book, Liberal Fascism, it's all there.

  • GoCo77

    First lets not go there on corrupt voting "Accorn anyone" And second 911 was a conspiracy made by 19 terrorists and Al Qaeda

  • Did you ever wonder why people who support 9/11 Truth aren't rioting in the streets, raising an armed rebellion, or why they're for gun control - taking guns away from civilians? Well it's quite simple, it's not true.

  • Nice

  • "of modern liberal facists aren't that far away from them."

    If that exploitation happens than it becomes pseudo-capitalist. Liberal fascism is a lie, people change their political views all the time. What's wrong with being godless?

  • problem is, Gulianni said that! I heard it and I saw it.

  • ahvaimusicom, anybody can come on here and say anything...please provide a source if you're going to make such a consequential statement.

  • Also no you have not defined it.

  • Communism- An extreme left economic idea, the govt. owns all the means of production and establishes non-exploitation. It is classless and wants to give all people an equal economic opportunity. Satisfied?

  • Almost got it, If you said anything about the communist party. What would happen to you?

  • What're you talking about? I never mentioned the communist party of any country.

  • Then where talking about two different things I think.

  • make yourself clear, what do you want me to explain to you?

  • nothing don't worry about it.

  • okay.

  • From the looks of Durco's comments, he's conflating Communism with the totalitarian regimes that have been necessary to maintain such an economic system during the 20th century.

  • Typical conservative crap. Step one: start wars. Step two: become a fascist. Step three: Blame everyone else and deny everything.

  • --Step two: become a fascist.--

    You obvioulsy haven't read his book or seen his speaches

  • It's spelled "speeches". Fascism is to the extreme right and anarchism is to the extreme left, end of story. Many conservatives have critized him for misinterpreting liberalism, or perhaps they're "traitors" to the conservative faith?

  • WHAT!? Conservatives want the least ammount of government control over their lives as possible, and dont want social programs to be forced upon them. They want to be free to live their lives how ever they choose. I think you're mixing up terms...

    On the other hand, the left loves forcing tax funded social programs on people and laws to ensure people's "saftey." I live in Massachusetts. Please come for a visit and experience this.

  • Ahh but conservatives want all the power to be focused on rich and greedy corporations so that they can abuse their costumers. Laissez-faire allowed companies to create monopolies but the liberals had to clean up after their crap. You know nothing about the left wing, Jonah Goldberg has been ciritized for misinterpreting liberalism. It's as simple as that.

  • Once again, I live in Massachusetts. I attend a Massachusetts highschool, and will be attending an extremely liberal college (in MA). Don't try telling be that I don't know anything about the left. I swim in it everyday of my life.

    And I'm a moderate, btw.

  • You seem to be ignoring my comments, you will attend a liberal college so what? I've a conservative friend who attends my high school and knows little of the left. I listen to conservative points of views everywhere, we have plenty of republicans here inthe east coast. I also research this stuff 'cuz it ineterests me. You have your points of view and I have mine, end of story.

  • @Entropy56 Every corporatist believes in laissez faire capitalism until they have enough money to influence elections and buy politicians to grant them monopoly rights, special priviledges, get away with instituting anti competitve business practices and getting no bid contracts...

    Then when they get what they want from their pet senator they go back to the laissez faires best schtick.

  • Define Fascist. For me. Willing to bet you don't know what the word means.

  • Ok, a Right-wing totalitarian system with extreme nationalism, corporatism and anti-communism. You wouldn't have been able to define half of that, neither did Goldberg.

  • So communism is not fascistic?

  • No it's not jesus christ. Communism is a mere economic system.

  • You don't know anything.

  • You're fading fast. Elighten me if you will.

  • I would try however I don't think you would get it.

  • The problem is that you don't have the guts nor brains to tell me anything. Prove me wrong if you will. Don't worry, I'm no close-mided right-winger. I bet my balls you didn't even know the definition of communism. You can continue to believe Goldberg's BS, or, you can learn something for once. Your choice

    Ciao.

  • First of all we where discussing fascism with communism. Have you ever heard of the gulag?

  • Of course I heard of a gulag, do you think I'm that stupid? The problem is that you refuse to understand what communism despite that I've already explained 3000000 times.

  • Wait you where just asking me how fascism was in communist. "Thus" the gulag. Like I said you will not understand it.

  • nin1963 - Jonah Goldberg is doing what liberal moron after liberal moron has failed to do - explain what is FACISM and what is LIBERALISM in contemporary context and historical context. Liberal do not like this because for years they have been trying to stick the 'facist' label on CONSERVATIVES - I mean jeez I've even been subjected to this b\s - one liberal webmaster compared me to 'pol pot', Stalin and Hitler (all hard left socialists) because of my conservative beliefs!! Payback is a bitch!

  • hitler was a hard left socialist? you are a fucking dumbass. do you even know what fascism is?

  • Fascism-A right-wing totalitarian system with extreme nationalism, extreme corporatism and extreme anti-communism. There's nothing to it.

  • Well by that definition Hitler was definitely NOT a fascist. He was a socialist which makes him a lefty but he was also a nationalist which tends towards the right - Hitler was also an extreme racist but then so was Stalin when it suited him - as for Hitler being 'anti-communist' well that only arose when he realised that Stalin couldn't be trusted before he waged war on the Soviet Union he was very willing to do deals with fellow socialists!

  • He BECAME a fascist whne he said and believed that socialism was a failure. Hitler continued lying, making it look like he was a leftist, I think not. He murdered all leftist, inclunding his "fellow" socialists.

  • Hahaha thats a alaughable argument - it is nothing new for hard lefty's to kill and oppose each other Stalin for example wasn't exactly above rubbing out ANY opponent right or left!

  • Stalin killed anyonme agaisnt him, learn to spell.  It's nothing new for fascists to kill fellow fascists because they think they're better.

  • "Learn to spell" - do you think you're in a Harry Potter story or something? lol

    As for implying that Stalin was a 'fellow fascist' - well in that case you have to concede that fascists aren't confined to the right!

  • Learn to make sense first.

  • Oh, nice come back.

  • ""Learn to spell" - do you think you're in a Harry Potter story or something? lol" I wasn't talking to you, you don't understand what fascism is. It's based on extreme corporatism, get the picture? Hitler wasn't a socialist, he abandoned the idead and pretended to be one. A few social programs don't make some one a lefty. He destroyed labor unions and set up extreme corporatism. I meant that Stalin was murderer, don't take evrything so literally.

  • Fascist economics sought to combine the state control of the left with the meritocracy of the right, so that meritocracy could be used for the benefit of the people rather than large corporations or wealthy individuals.

    Fascism is a centrist ideology, with strong authoritatian leanings.

    Social policy cannot be measured on the same axis as economic policy, because that would be conflating the two, which is clearly unrealistic in light of recent history.

  • Wait.. wait.. wait... You mean to tell me the Liberal "Political Correctness" thing isn't "New Speak?" Let me ask you something: Have you been to the Jewish Heritage Museum? Do you know HOW the eugenics movement started in Germany? Do you know what it's like to hear the cries of children considered unfit to live? Just today scientists admit the hurricane problems due to global warming... is WRONG. Go to Yahoo, read it yourself!

  • I mean... seriously: What kind of group will stand by and continue to fight for the right of those to continue peddle smut, but can't allow people to smoke... in a BAR for crying out loud? Why does personal responsibility apply to porn, but not to substance abuse? They tell me what I should eat, what I should wear, where I should buy- You don't believe me? I have the choice to wear "made in china" if it's in a sweat shop, eat grease, smoke, and pollute. Wise? NO! But that's what CHOICE is!

  • yyyeeeaaahhhhh, that's quite a confrontation...???

  • Boy this guy has had his balls removed.

  • Dumb quote --"Must be some way to screen these guys out"...

    Jonah Goldberg is truly a scam artist manipulator who does not work for the best interest of American citizens.  Paid hack.

  • This babbling fool sounds like a televangelist thumping his book of twisted fairytales. All attitude and spin, no facts or sense.

  • As we can see now, Rudy Guiliani did not came anywhere close to getting the nomination ... for reasons that had nothing to do with 9/11. He simply chose not to campaign in the early states and let himself be forgotten by the media.

  • The caller said, "There's no historical precedence for any building to collapse from fire."

    He's only off by a few million.

  • ONE WITH A STEEL CONSTRUCTION

  • Plus one that's a skyscraper over 50 stories high.

  • Jonah Goldberg -- just another whore paid to lie and pooh pooh the truth.  Explain, please, Mr. Goldberg, how the Federal Reserve works and reveal please who controls it, and tell us please which law authorizes the IRS to collect taxes.

  • answer: the bilderberg group and reptile jews

  • Jonah Goldberg...His name is a double whammy. I am not anti-Semitic by any means, but holy fuck when will the stereotypes end!

  • OK people lets get back on point.

    The NeoConazi's have pushed the discussion off the facts and into us bickering. Divided they fall? !

    So, 9.11 was an inside Job, as are many CIA terrorist attacks around the world. CIA works for the Bankers to start wars to force the USA to borrow more and more money from the Central Banking System. Investigate your govt. without doing so, you have to right to be Free.

  • "NeoConazi's" [sic]

    You don't know what a Nazi is. I suggest you do some reading.

  • Oh, how quaint. Some ignoramus has thumbed my comment down.

    If you can't handle the facts, then just lash out kids, it's all the rage.

  • Uh,I DID read the book. Got paid to do it, too.

    But since we're on the subject of stupid cunts from Seattle, enlighten me: in what ways, specifically, does my intellect lag? Other than remind you that Jonah's success is entirely due to nepotism, what have I done that qualifies you to comment on my intellectual skills? A hunch doesn't count, knobsnot. I mean, since you've come out so vehemently against jumping to conclusions.

    (Man, this is easier than slagging Jonah!)

  • Lol...And I get PAID to watch Keith Olbermann every night and get on YouTube to post nasty little comments about his clips.

    Oh, and you STILL haven't interacted with the material in his book--the one you got paid to read. You've just called me a "cunt" and "knobshot", and tried to discredit Goldberg simply on the basis that a family connection helped his career early on.

  • This "nepotism" you're so disgusted about as regards Goldberg, I'm sure you wouldn't begrudge a Kennedy, though. And since you're so fond of discrediting people based on single incidences, I defy you to ever vote in a public election, or speak fondly of ANYBODY, ANYWHERE. What a disingenuous prick you are.

    (Man, this is easier than slagging Olbermann!)

  • jklseattle

    what is easy is making YOUR lame ass

    run and hide and block comments.

    as soon as someone calls you out, you do your name calling and then block them so you don't have to hear the repercussions.

    what a spineless coward YOU are.

  • And I get PAID to watch Olbermann every night and go on YouTube to post nasty little comments about him. LOL. And you STILL haven't interacted with the content of his BOOK--the one you "got paid" to read. All you've done is call me a "cunt" and a "knobshot", and attempt to discredit Goldberg solely on the basis that a family connection helped him early in his career.

  • Oh, and I'm sure you wouldn't begrudge the Kennedys of the nepotism that has made THEM what they are... And since you're so fond of discrediting people based on single incidences, I defy you to ever speak supportively of ANYONE, ANYWHERE. You're such a disingenuous prick, "Steve".

    (Man, this is easier than slagging Keith!)

  • jklseattle

    what is easy is making YOUR lame ass

    run and hide and block comments.

    as soon as someone calls you out, you do your name calling and then block them so you don't have to hear the repercussions.

    what a spineless coward you are.

    typical reich-wing hypocrite.

  • "Whaaah!"

  • What an arrogant ass...and yet he acknowledges the caller as a 9/11 Truther! I knew he would laugh when answering the question. Pure evil.

  • Wanna know who likes to screen out callers, Jonah?

    The NAZIS, that's who!!!

    Wow, this is easy. Maybe my mom can get me a book deal, too!

  • What a stupid name you have. And what a stupid, lagging intellect. You haven't read his book either. But DAMN, you've got opinions about it anyway! Typical liberal.

  • Jonah Goldberg may be the dumbest person in America who appears on television. I am including all the news reading bimbos and Britney Spears.

  • Then go to one of his lectures, get in line at the mic during the Q&A, and show him just how dumb he is!  You go! Stuuuuuuuupid liberal.

  • He said it in the face of a news crew, camera rolling, mike open, he said he had been told, the towers were going to collaps, with enough time to save many. However,the radio mayday, to evacuate was not heard and many died!

    It is a not a 9/11 truth propaganda campaign. It was the reality that happened that day which was taped as Rudy RAN!!!!

    The media, paid for and bought by Giuliani wants to discredit that.

  • Actually he told them that he was told the tower was about to collapse, and that it did before he could exit the building he was in, and that the collapse trapped him in that building for 10-15 minutes.

    At 9:37 a.m., an occupant on the 105th floor of the South Tower reported that floors beneath him "in the 90-something floor" had collapsed.

    That's over 20 minutes prior to the actual collapse. If Giuliani was in on it, he'd be out of there at the first sign of internal instability.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more