I wonder if MrAdel007 believes Also in talking snakes, chariots that fly out into space, virgins ability to produce a fertized egg without sperm, and that particular and specific people are superior over others? We have found millions upon millions of data that proves humans could not have lived with dinosaurs. But to put one's belief in a myth begotten by 1000's of years of fear and subterfuge to others is a myth I'd rather not deal with. If God can do everything - why doesn't he. Torture?
Thanks for a fascinating video. As I listen to the news about the Kepler search for earth like planets I think about these forces at work beyond our Earth.
DrMontague, your work and effort of putting these videos up for our enjoyment and education is truly appreciated, I consider myself well educated, but even I find things I wasn't aware of, I'm always looking for more. Thanks again.
The R.C. Catholic church accepts the age of the earth as 4.5 billion years. They had to because they couldn't hold back the tide of scientific evidence. So they had to find away around biblical teaching of a 6000 yr old earth. So the church simply started to play on semantics, i.e. perhaps a day is 40 million years long and not 24 hours. Personally I think this was a 'clutching at straws' argument for the inaccuracy of the bible in the face of scientific evidence.
luxeden, you really need to get yourself some very simple starter books on astronomy and evolutionary biology. I'm not belittling you but even science books for children could help you begin to understand these subjects.
scientists can be more fanatic than religious people , it is not because you believe in evolution that you are right in your theories about earth, earth is full of impacts which contradict a lot of the evolution theory.. and life on mars was possible because they discovered water , water is life , get your facts instead of belittling me. see my videos about mars
Luxeden. I've give you fair chance. I've have been a science teacher I know what I'm talking about within the limits of the secondary school curriculum. You are obviously not very well educated or you deliberately pratting around. No one has belittled you, people were trying to help you. Your blocked from posting comments. Yourself to blame.
I thought he genuinely wanted to learn at first then I became suspicious that hes a creationist. My suspicions where confirmed when he posted crap about evolution on one of my videos. Thankfully not all religious people are are close minded and accept the findings of science. Guess I'll block him too since he's not interested in educating himself.
Thanx DeConverted. When I first uploaded these videos I would spend hour of my valuable time and life trying to make people understand scientific concepts. Your right of course that not all religious people are are close minded. luxeden is a creationist time waster. He's probably a Kent Hovind throw back. Never waste hours of time on them. Life is too short. I wouldn't talk to him in a pub.
How can the scientists be so sure that the earth is billions of years old? look at Mars it is completely dead , our universe dont allow planets to last..
click on my user name 'Dr Montague' and then click on 'my videos' look for the vid with the title 'How scientists can calculate the age of the Earth'. Its only a 9 minute vid but it explains things clearly.
Yes I know that scientits calculate the age of the earth but carbon dating is not accurate because all the planets on the solar system are cratered by thousands of impacts and even rendered completely dead , logically earth cant last millions of years..
Carbon dating is only good for somewhere around 50,000 ~ 70,000 years. Radiometric is what is used for older things. Wikipedia it so you get a better understanding.
Think of planets as huge vacuum cleaners. Their mass = gravity(suction). When the solar system was forming there was countless asteroids that got sucked up. Eventually you pass a heaving cleaning period where impacts are rare. If you look at other bodies in the solar system, they have nothing(water, wind, volcanism) to erode those impacts so they are preserved. Hope this clears up your thinking that the earth cant last for millions of years.
Impacts are not rare , earth supported 130 000 major impacts in the past ..Not too long ago on 30 june 1908 a small object hit earth it was known as the Tunguska event..the impact was seven hundred times more powerful than Hiroshima.. And to say that other planets dont have water you are wrong Mars and one of the satellites of Saturn have water ..
luxeden it good that you take an interest in such a subject. However, your views are flawed and in places blatently wrong. you state:'A lot of evidence shows that Mars supported life in the past'.We have no evidence that Mars once supported life. If we did then it would be the greatest discovery of mankind and would totally revoltionize our thinking and of our place in the universe.
Impacts are not rare , earth supported 130 000 major impacts in the past ..Not too long ago on 30 june 1908 a small object hit earth it was known as the tunguska event..the impact was seven hundred times more powerful than Hiroshima.. And to say that other planets dont have water you are wrong Mars and one of the satellites of Saturn have water ..
Hi luxeden it's not carbon dating that is used for calculating the age of the earth, it's 'radio active decay. You state: 'logically earth cant last millions of years. Why do you think this? or what do you mean by this? Do you mean that life couldn't begin on earth?. I'm going to upload another vid which explains why earth became the planet to support life and why the others were unable to support life.
A lot of evidence shows that Mars supported life in the past , they are sure that water was on mars and still exists frozen underground but Mars doesnt support life anymore , guess why? because planets dont last too long ..
Hopefully DrMontague will have to patience to put all your post in context and show why your assumptions are just plain wrong. I personally don't have the patience for such ignorance. Good luck!
Hi DeConverted. I'm not sure if you can reorganize the comments. However, I agree with you that luxeden isn't understanding the basic concepts and this makes it hard work. You would certainly have to have a face to face talk with this user as it would be just too time comsuming to use a comment box to try and explain things esp. since there is a 500 character limit.
Dr Montague is an anthropologist investigating and trying to prove the existence of the paranormal activity. For example, Montague today might think that quantum theory might explain (apart from the deliberate fraudsters) ghostly phenomenon. Luke Sanderson another character is a total sceptic. I like diolgue between these two charactors as they are at odds with each other. Since this is a comment board and can lead to arguments I thought I would use the name.
Since many of u users r from the United states I would like u to know who Dr Montague actually was. He's a character created by the American authoress the 'late' Shirly Jackson in her excellent novel 'The haunting of Hill House'. Robert Wise made a B&W film of the book in 1963 and called it 'The Haunting' but he changed the doctor's name to Dr Markway. The film in my opinion is outstanding and captures well the atmosphere of the book.
I wonder if MrAdel007 believes Also in talking snakes, chariots that fly out into space, virgins ability to produce a fertized egg without sperm, and that particular and specific people are superior over others? We have found millions upon millions of data that proves humans could not have lived with dinosaurs. But to put one's belief in a myth begotten by 1000's of years of fear and subterfuge to others is a myth I'd rather not deal with. If God can do everything - why doesn't he. Torture?
resculptit 1 year ago
I believe in creation and not evolution .Everything is created by God the almighty and I believe in what the Holy Bible says. that is my conviction
MrAdel007 1 year ago
@MrAdel007 That is because you are deluded fuckwit!
DrMontague 1 year ago 4
@MrAdel007 well what's wrong with believing evolution was part of gods creation?
Chewu 1 year ago
@Chewu Why would a supposedly intelligent and compassionate creator want use a nasty process evolution to create homosapians?!
DrMontague 1 year ago 2
thanks man keep it up ! that doccumentary is well do .
nauta51 2 years ago
Nice series. Thanks for putting it up on YouTube.
warren52nz 2 years ago
That was a good program.thank you !
no1saphead 2 years ago 3
Mud-bubble formations frozen into several billion year old rock, so fucking cool.
starguts 2 years ago 2
Thanks for posting - great set of videos
DemeterCanada 2 years ago 2
Can you upload all the episodes of Earth Story?
Ashybasha 3 years ago
It would take too much time. However you can buy the dvd box set it is relatively inexpensive in the UK. Check online for best prices.
DrMontague 3 years ago
Thanks for a fascinating video. As I listen to the news about the Kepler search for earth like planets I think about these forces at work beyond our Earth.
gilraen789 3 years ago
i left my cmt for the last video.
THANKS, very much!
brainthiest 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this. Utterly fascinating.
bshieldsbb01 4 years ago
Great video, DrM. Thanks for posting it!
Adrock828 4 years ago
AWESOME!
gtccold 4 years ago 5
Great vidio. now go see "history of the universe made easy" for more facts v reigius rubbish.
warbeck007 4 years ago
thank you so much for this great video.
marklethanarkle 4 years ago
Thanks for the great vids
Graffix33 4 years ago
DrMontague, your work and effort of putting these videos up for our enjoyment and education is truly appreciated, I consider myself well educated, but even I find things I wasn't aware of, I'm always looking for more. Thanks again.
krendoshazin 4 years ago
The R.C. Catholic church accepts the age of the earth as 4.5 billion years. They had to because they couldn't hold back the tide of scientific evidence. So they had to find away around biblical teaching of a 6000 yr old earth. So the church simply started to play on semantics, i.e. perhaps a day is 40 million years long and not 24 hours. Personally I think this was a 'clutching at straws' argument for the inaccuracy of the bible in the face of scientific evidence.
DrMontague 5 years ago
luxeden, you really need to get yourself some very simple starter books on astronomy and evolutionary biology. I'm not belittling you but even science books for children could help you begin to understand these subjects.
DrMontague 5 years ago
scientists can be more fanatic than religious people , it is not because you believe in evolution that you are right in your theories about earth, earth is full of impacts which contradict a lot of the evolution theory.. and life on mars was possible because they discovered water , water is life , get your facts instead of belittling me. see my videos about mars
luxeden 5 years ago
Luxeden. I've give you fair chance. I've have been a science teacher I know what I'm talking about within the limits of the secondary school curriculum. You are obviously not very well educated or you deliberately pratting around. No one has belittled you, people were trying to help you. Your blocked from posting comments. Yourself to blame.
DrMontague 5 years ago
I thought he genuinely wanted to learn at first then I became suspicious that hes a creationist. My suspicions where confirmed when he posted crap about evolution on one of my videos. Thankfully not all religious people are are close minded and accept the findings of science. Guess I'll block him too since he's not interested in educating himself.
DeConverted 5 years ago
Thanx DeConverted. When I first uploaded these videos I would spend hour of my valuable time and life trying to make people understand scientific concepts. Your right of course that not all religious people are are close minded. luxeden is a creationist time waster. He's probably a Kent Hovind throw back. Never waste hours of time on them. Life is too short. I wouldn't talk to him in a pub.
DrMontague 5 years ago
If someone doesnt believe in evolution does that makes him automatically a creationist ? what kind of logic is this?
Veetina 5 years ago
How can the scientists be so sure that the earth is billions of years old? look at Mars it is completely dead , our universe dont allow planets to last..
luxeden 5 years ago
click on my user name 'Dr Montague' and then click on 'my videos' look for the vid with the title 'How scientists can calculate the age of the Earth'. Its only a 9 minute vid but it explains things clearly.
DrMontague 5 years ago
Yes I know that scientits calculate the age of the earth but carbon dating is not accurate because all the planets on the solar system are cratered by thousands of impacts and even rendered completely dead , logically earth cant last millions of years..
luxeden 5 years ago
Carbon dating is only good for somewhere around 50,000 ~ 70,000 years. Radiometric is what is used for older things. Wikipedia it so you get a better understanding.
DeConverted 5 years ago
Think of planets as huge vacuum cleaners. Their mass = gravity(suction). When the solar system was forming there was countless asteroids that got sucked up. Eventually you pass a heaving cleaning period where impacts are rare. If you look at other bodies in the solar system, they have nothing(water, wind, volcanism) to erode those impacts so they are preserved. Hope this clears up your thinking that the earth cant last for millions of years.
DeConverted 5 years ago
Hi DeConverted thanx for your support.
DrMontague 5 years ago
Impacts are not rare , earth supported 130 000 major impacts in the past ..Not too long ago on 30 june 1908 a small object hit earth it was known as the Tunguska event..the impact was seven hundred times more powerful than Hiroshima.. And to say that other planets dont have water you are wrong Mars and one of the satellites of Saturn have water ..
luxeden 5 years ago
sorry it is one of the moons of Jupiter which is supposed to have water.
luxeden 5 years ago
luxeden it good that you take an interest in such a subject. However, your views are flawed and in places blatently wrong. you state:'A lot of evidence shows that Mars supported life in the past'.We have no evidence that Mars once supported life. If we did then it would be the greatest discovery of mankind and would totally revoltionize our thinking and of our place in the universe.
DrMontague 5 years ago
yes water is the evidence, whenever there is water there is life
luxeden 5 years ago
Impacts are not rare , earth supported 130 000 major impacts in the past ..Not too long ago on 30 june 1908 a small object hit earth it was known as the tunguska event..the impact was seven hundred times more powerful than Hiroshima.. And to say that other planets dont have water you are wrong Mars and one of the satellites of Saturn have water ..
luxeden 5 years ago
Hi luxeden it's not carbon dating that is used for calculating the age of the earth, it's 'radio active decay. You state: 'logically earth cant last millions of years. Why do you think this? or what do you mean by this? Do you mean that life couldn't begin on earth?. I'm going to upload another vid which explains why earth became the planet to support life and why the others were unable to support life.
DrMontague 5 years ago
A lot of evidence shows that Mars supported life in the past , they are sure that water was on mars and still exists frozen underground but Mars doesnt support life anymore , guess why? because planets dont last too long ..
luxeden 5 years ago
Hopefully DrMontague will have to patience to put all your post in context and show why your assumptions are just plain wrong. I personally don't have the patience for such ignorance. Good luck!
DeConverted 5 years ago
Hi DeConverted. I'm not sure if you can reorganize the comments. However, I agree with you that luxeden isn't understanding the basic concepts and this makes it hard work. You would certainly have to have a face to face talk with this user as it would be just too time comsuming to use a comment box to try and explain things esp. since there is a 500 character limit.
DrMontague 5 years ago
Did you feel some affinity towards Dr Montague of the story...?
trumbone 5 years ago
Dr Montague is an anthropologist investigating and trying to prove the existence of the paranormal activity. For example, Montague today might think that quantum theory might explain (apart from the deliberate fraudsters) ghostly phenomenon. Luke Sanderson another character is a total sceptic. I like diolgue between these two charactors as they are at odds with each other. Since this is a comment board and can lead to arguments I thought I would use the name.
DrMontague 5 years ago
Thanks, excellent film. You won't get any arguments from me though:-)
trumbone 5 years ago
thank you doctor M!
dtandersen 5 years ago
Since many of u users r from the United states I would like u to know who Dr Montague actually was. He's a character created by the American authoress the 'late' Shirly Jackson in her excellent novel 'The haunting of Hill House'. Robert Wise made a B&W film of the book in 1963 and called it 'The Haunting' but he changed the doctor's name to Dr Markway. The film in my opinion is outstanding and captures well the atmosphere of the book.
DrMontague 5 years ago
thank you
geyser 5 years ago