Added: 4 years ago
From: BereanBeacon
Views: 922
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • speaking as a geology student, this is very primitive and id love to explain at great length to this man why hes wrong and confused

  • @HoratioMing Well, here is an opportunity to provide your information in The Life Science Prize forum. Dr. Mastropaolo has been seeking for years for someone like yourself.

  • the buybull hahahahahahahah

  • That still does not anser how some cultures predate the flood & survived it & have no record of this so called world wide flood!

  • @billbo1154 Did you check the link?

  • If there was a world wide flood how did the greeks & chines& egyptions servive.And yet thay have no record of a world wide flood i dont think thay missed it.

  • @billbo1154 8 persons were on the ark and from them came all the people of the world.

  • religion is fading fast soon it will be just anouther MYTH!

  • @billbo1154 All religions will be coming together into a one world religion with the anti christ in charge. We tell others about the free gift of God by faith in Jesus Christ which is not a religion but is an enemy of those religions.

    Your time is near.

    That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11

  • @billbo1154 You sir are right ,but in defense of my faith in Jesus this is supposed to happen! To bad for you the clock is winding down and you might not make it aboard the life boat as the sinking ship of the world is plunged into the unbelievable depths of wrath.No one willingly jumps off the ship without first having a floatation device,you are going to sink like a stone if you dont get right with your God.Remember its your fault when it comes to pass. think about it.

  • Many cultures predate the flood thay have no record of this so called world flood!

  • @billbo1154 Many stories about a flood in these cultures. dotnwcreationdotnet/noahlegend­dothtml

  • LOL! I predicted calcium deposits before watching this piece of lunacy, and lo and behold, calcium deposits! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHA!

    Creotard morons!

  • Trees are buried in volcanic ash all the time. Volcanic ash is what they date.

    But you creationists don't accept it.

    THE FOSSILS ARE SORTED SIMPLE TO COMPLEX,

    who cares how long it takes.

    Make me a triolbite fossil in 2 weeks.

  • We have fossils,

    we have a theory to explain them.

    If you want to prove the theory wrong you will need to study the fossils.

    But some how they are invisible to creationists.

  • During the Late Triassic, this desert region was located in the tropics and was seasonally wet and dry. In seasonal flooding, the trees washed from where they grew and accumulated in sandy river channels, where they were buried periodically by layers of gravely sand, rich in volcanic ash from volcanoes further to the west. The volcanic ash was the source of the silica that helped to permineralize the buried logs, replacing wood with silica, colored with oxides of iron and manganese.

  • Fossils can form rapidly

    therefore all fossils are young.??!?

    Time for a logic lesson,

    Does not compute, ERROR ERROR

  • this guy does not know the differance between a fossil and a mud covered rock.

  • Fossils usually take millions of years because they get buried deep in the earth. Just because they can be covered by minerals in weeks, that is not fossilization.

  • Nice video, nothing moves.

  • We were talking about "Origin of Species" by C. Darwin.

    spontaneous generation has nothing to do with 'racist darwin' evolution.

  • why don't you give the entire title of darwin's famous book? is it because it betrays your cause, and proves he was a racist. "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life" darwin advocated exterminating certain darker races. sort of changes things hey? Hitler was a big fan of this book. so was Margaret Sanger, founder of planned parenthood who had it in for the black race. facts are a funny thing, aren't they?

  • races? name a race of species.

    I think he meant something else.

    Darwin was against slaves, unlike the bible.

    Hitler was a christian.

  • just because there's slavery in the Bible doesn't mean it's condoned. Incest is in there but it's not condoned either. hitler was born a catholic, and honest catholics will tell you it's a different religion than Christianity as they have told me. I'll be glad to help you out on any other spiritual matters.

  • Catholics will tell you they are the only true christians, you broke away, Luther was excommunicated and went to hell.

    Catholics worship Christ, Christ ians, get it.

  • you're really showing your ignorance of the topic. Catholicism got it's start from Constantine in 325 ad. He was a sun worshipper (Baal worship in the Bible--research it) He melded his pagan beliefs w/ Christianity that had been around for 300 yrs. at the heart of the cult of the dead woman is the worship in the supposed co-redemptrix Mary and the belief that she prays for us and can get us to heaven. This is BLASPHEMY!!! if you need anymore answers just let me know & I'll try my best.

  • The earliest recorded evidence of the use of the term "Catholic Church" is the Letter to the Smyrnaeans that Ignatius of Antioch wrote in about 107 to Christians in Smyrna.

    The romans accepted it in 325 ad

    Mary will ask God to answer you prayers if you ask he nice

  • don't be fooled. Just like the sodomites have hijacked the word "gay" the catholics hijacked to word "catholic," which is to mean universal. 1Tim 2:5-6 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time ---mary was just a rotten sinner like the rest of us who admitted she needed salvation.

  • So catholics were the first church, when did your church start?

  • the roman catholic church was NOT the first Church. My Church started in Acts 11:26b And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.--are you aware of the story of Constantine seeing a cross in a vision, placed the cross on the shields of his soldiers and them winning the battle? well, it wasn't a cross, but an egyptian pagan ankh. check everything out yourself

  • You aren't a protastant?

  • nope. that myth is put out by the catholic church to make them seem like they were the original. you can trace TRUE Christianity from today to the Waldensies and others all the way down to Antioch. Protestants are Medodists, Pentecostals which came from the Methodists, Episcopals, Presbyterians. let me ask this--what form of government do we have in the u.s.?

  • the usa is a republic

    what religion are you?

    Christianity would not have survived if Constantine had not become Catholic.

  • you are correct, a republic. but all you hear on tv, radio and from politicians is a democracy. that's not true. the founding fathers despised the notion of a democracy. see how the lies stick? I believe it was hitler who said tell a lie long enough and people will believe it. I don't know where you get your info, but Christianity will always survive, regardless of how man tries to quash it. remember the catholic inquisition against the Christians? 50 million Christians dead.

  • What does that have to do with the lies in this video.

  • @gregrutz Let's get this straight, one clown is responsible for all of Christianity - 2000 years worth??? This is more significant than Paul, Jesus and even God! Talk about a bottle neck! How many other religions hung by such a thread, but slipped into oblivion? What if he said screw it and cooked the books? Where were all the historians to keep such a powerfully important book alive? So out goes all the "scripture is historical" claims. Evidently historians considered it a meaningless book!

  • @SounzNice Yes, most gods slipped into oblivion; Zues, Mercury, Ra, etc.

    And fossils do take millions of years to form.

  • @gregrutz .. or as long as cement takes to harden or faster.

  • @SounzNice Who cares how long they takes. Look at the fossils not the gaps.

    The fossils are layered like this:

    In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils

    and dinosaur fossils

    No humans or bunnies in any of these layers. WHY?

  • @gregrutz said: "Who cares how long they takes."

    You did.

    "Look at the fossils not the gaps."

    I mention gaps?

    "Fossil layer like this (from bottom, upwards): shells,fish,amphibian,reptiles­,dinos,birds"

    That's the expected order after a flood. Shells can't swim. Fish do. The rest are more agile. Birds fly and can hover in the air. No humans, bunnies etc because, obviously, none lived there at the time. Humans occupy <1% of the land today.

  • @SounzNice You are so fucking stupid it is not funny. If the fish in the oceans died in the flood how do we have fish today?

    ''none lived there at the time'' God flooded the earth to kill all the people dummy.

  • @SounzNice What flood, they proved there wasn't a flood 200 years ago.

  • ...adding...

    Dentists create fossils all the time - IN SECONDS when they make dental imprints.

  • @SounzNice Like the IDiot talking, you don't know the difference between a fossil and some calcium buildup.

  • @gregrutz How do YOU know the difference?? Don't forget, it was you who said it requires millions of years for a fossil to form!! So it goes to show which of us truly has their head up their butt on the topic. Sweep your own doorstep first. Everyone will laugh at your hypocracy when you criticise others on a topic you are totally clueless about. Why do this to yourself?

  • @SounzNice How about if I inform you that Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 160,000,000 years, changing over time. Get the idea now.

    And you have never opened a science book hypocrite and totally clueless ID-iot.

  • @gregrutz Slander slander slander - the Evolutionismist way of debate.

  • @SounzNice At least we don't lie like creationists do.

  • @gregrutz That's a lie itself. At least we can recognize lies.

    

  • @SounzNice What did I say that is a lie? You have never studied fossils how can you recognize a lie?

    This video lies, there was no global flood.

    The earth is millions of years old, dinosaurs ruled the earht for 160 million years.

  • @SounzNice Dentists don't make fossils dummy, they make plaster casts.

    Why don't you find out what a fossils is so you don't look so stupid on the net.

  • Were are the fossils of all the people who died in the 'Great Flood'

    Why can't you answer this question?

  • Were are the fossils of all the people who died in the 'Great Flood'

  • we find human fossils all the time. but you cant determine when they died. you cant tell when they were born, where they were born, nor when they died. all you know about a dead organism is that it died.. p.s. the infallible carbon dating (wink wink) has dated LIVE snails to be 2500 yrs old.

  • I have hiked in the Grand Canyon,

    at the bottom I found

    a layer of rock with only shell fossils in it,

    above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils,

    above that a layer with dinosaur fossils in it.

    These are the FACTS, go look for yourself.

    You will never find a human fossil at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

  • you wont find a human fossil in my house but there's all sorts of evidence people have live here. whether human fossils have been found in the grand canyon is irrelevant and is a non starter. there's no bones in my house neither. i cant speak for yours though

  • would you weigh your car with a kitchen scale? Then why on earth would you test the age of a living organism with a testing method not meant for that?

    by the way, if the dating came up with 2500 years old for Carbon, then it means the snail recently ingested something that was 2500 years old.

  • Were are the fossils of all the people who died in the 'Great Flood'

  • I have hiked in the Grand Canyon, here is what I found.

    at the bottom is a layer with only shell fossils in it,

    above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils,

    above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibians and reptile fossils,

    above is sandstone from a great desert.

    above that dinosaur fossils,

    no fossils of man have ever been found mixed with these.

    These are the FACTS, look for yourself

  • did you find any art from cave dwellers depicting humans spearing brontosaurus looking beasts? these drawings are there. These are the FACTS, look for yourself

  • NO, and neither did any one else. FAIL

  • there's all sorts of cave and pottery paintings from those that lived in the grand canyon and others around the world. paintings of men fighting dinosaur looking creatures. dont be a fool.

  • I guess a couple of "dinosaur looking creatures" overturns 200 years of science supporting evolution. Don't be a fool.

  • George Wald, evolutionist, American scientist &1967 Nobel Prize winner.

    "When it comes to the origin of life on this earth, there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution).There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved 100 years ago, but that leads us only to one other conclusion: that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds ; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance."

  • I see you put evolution in ( ). Is that because he really didn't say

    evolution. He was talking about spontaneous generation which is totally different than Evolution

  • spontaneous generation is the lie evolutionists have had to come up w/, the primordial soup, cause evolution falls flat on its face in light of the facts. you can read what the evolutionist, nobel prize winning biophyicist wald said for yourself--if you dare (it may be destroying your faith in that racists darwin as we speak) good day

  • spontaneous generation (evolution).

    I think you added the 'evolution' part.

    It has nothing to do with how life started.

  • where did the first life supposedly come from if it didnt magically appear from nothing spontaneously, violating the law of conservation of matter?

  • Try again, you got 2 arguments confused. Evolution is how life diversified and changed.  Abiogenesis is about how life started. And science does not violate any law of science. Matter was always here, it is just expanding rapidly.

  • where did the matter come from?

  • Baby Jesus made that fossil wood to trick us. It's true, he flew from his cradle late one night and went around the world creating things such as: dinosaur fossils, caveman paintings, and he changed the world from flat to round. All to confuse his followers. Praise be to Baby Jesus.

  • CookieMonster442, For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. 1Corinthians 1:18,19

  • That's right Cookiemonster442 - Biblical verses and intense ignorance combined blow away ANY of your crazy Flying Baby Jesus Theories!

  • the natural process of fossilization is very rare and takes very long. sure we can manufacture the process and it's no longer natural so it's irelivant.

  • agentorange20 the natural process of fossilization is very rare and takes very long. sure we can manufacture the process and it's no longer natural so it's irelivant.

    If it is true that creating artificial studies is irrelevant, that would make Miller & Urey's work on the building blocks of life equally invalid. You can't have it both ways, after all.

  • Got buried by volcanic ash,hmmm,like the logs in Spirit Lake which have settled to the bottem of the lake standing upright while sediments acrued quickly,,,Mt St Helens is a study in creationism!

  • And HOW is Mount St Helens "is a study in creationism?" Can you point me to the peer review journals? Having spent 25 years studying MSH, I have yet to see any "evidence" of how MSH is a "study in creationism!"

  • lawilson200-Those upright logs are fossilizingin the mud at the bottom of the lake in layers of mud. This proves fossilization happens naturally in short periods of time. There's also the sedimentary layers that were deposited by the ensuing flood - also in a short period of time (evolutionists believe in layers forming over millions of years). Have you heard of the "limestone cowboy"? When you hear about these reports you should check them out to see if they're true.

  • Gee, I was standing on the shores of Spirit Lake only a week ago. The trees floating in the lake look the same to me as they did the first time I looked at them 25 years ago. The problem with YECers, you never actually visit Mount St Helens to find out what is truth and the lies passed along by people working at ICR!

  • FYI-There is a little industry here in the Pacific Northwest that trolls the bottoms of the Columbia and Willamette Rivers for logs that were transported down river more than a century ago. With old growth trees now scarce, the company can fetch a high price for the trees they find. Cold water acts as a good preservative, but it doesn't lead to "fossilization." The trees in Spirit Lake is the same.

  • thrufaithalone-What I find truly sad about YEC representations of the 1980 eruption, the gloss over the actual lessons and discoveries made during and since that event. Volcanoes are wonderful tools of nature, but they can be dangerous. By making up "discoveries" from Mount St Helens and ignoring the mountain's power, YECers are really doing the public a major disservice.

  • It is a waste of time to try and disagree with a delusional creationist. One should never agree with a delusion either. Seems like a dichotomy but you should stand your ground and neither affirm nor deny what is being said and done. Instead, as noted elsewhere, try to distract them with something different and get their attention elsewhere. Food is an excellent distraction

    IF YOU ARGUE WITH AN CREATIONIST OR AN ALZHEIMERS PATIENT, YOU GET EXACTLY WHAT YOU DESERVE

  • Triple03Baller013: Next time you come to my house please don't leave your shitstained condoms in the bed!!! If the next dude sees it I have to change the sheets.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more