@ the tomswampy, it is possible history channel reenacted the shot hathcock made using a period accurate scope, mythbusters used a modern scope that used more lenses.
how is it impossible...the number of glass elements in the scope, all of which are not flat but convex, they would simply deflect or deform the round and change is trajectory.
I know myth busters are not an exhaustive source byut they di try twice and failed to make it work. The rifle would also not likely be completely still either.
@Beefcake771 Quite possible, actually. Been tried and proven on Mythbusters. With a scope from that era combined with a FMJ bullet, it'll cut right through the scope.
Carlos Hathcock a US marine corps gunnery sniper ACTUALLY did this shot on hill 55. Hathcock took the NVA's gun as a trophy but it was stolen later from the armory. now thats an achievement. what a badass!!!
also the russian pu scope the nva was using is not as long as a modren scope. when they tryed to debunk gunny hathcocks shot they used a scope that had more lenses in it and was twice as long.
@TheHenirik Actually, this shot is very possible with the scopes made in that era. Combination scopes did not come into common practice until much later. Even during the Vietnam War, Carlos Hathcock made a similiar shot to this. It is not impossible, just difficult and requiring perfect accuracy and angle. In fact during this last conflict in Iraq a Marine Countersniper made a similiar shot but he was using a larger weapon with a higher grain round.
@bulletinyurass I did, and also several other attempts to recreate the Hathcock shot. They all initially used compound lens scopes. When they used a correct scope, shot angularly instead of head on at a range, and used a correct sight picture (target in shadow with no refraction) they were able to recreate the shot in several instances. The shot is possible, just not a common occurence as the correct variables must be in play to achieve it.
@PictishPrince the stupid thing about most war movies, they are sooo allied propaganda-ish, proper german soldiers (waffen SS, Wehrmacht) where much more trained and skilled than american soldiers, also in tactics. i also heard few stories from veterans. in these movies all americans, .. are shown as heroes, but in real life most of them got slaughterd by the germans.
@bulletinyurass Remember the most sniper kills in WW2 goes to Russians, and most of them were Women. In WW1 it was Germany who registered more sniper kills. Spanish-American war was the US. Civil War was the Union, War of 1812 was the US, Napoleonic wars was Russia, And the War of Revolution it was the irregular forces of the Continental Army. Sniping has been considered bad for a long time, only since Vietnam has it been looked at as a good way of fighting.
@PictishPrince the most kills were from men and there were few women that got over just 200 most top snipers were over what 400 besides it's not the kills that matter
@EvilxMerlin dude u need to do a bit more research the Red army had by far the most deadly snipers in WW2 look up manes like "Vasilij (Basil) Shalvovich Kvachantiradze," "Ivan Mikhaylovich Sidorenko," and "Mikhail Surkov" all these guys got way over 500 sniper kills. In fact lots of soviet snipers reached 500+ kills during WW2. Surkov got 702 confirmed kills (highest confirmed kills i know of) and Sidorenko became Russia's #1 sniper with 1079 sniper kills 542 confirmed. Twice as much as Simo!
Um, none of those were CONFIRMED. Thats the operative word here. Mikhail Surkov does NOT have 702 confirmed kills nor does Sidorenko. Else they would have been quite a lot more famous in Russia. CONFIRMED. Got it?
@EvilxMerlin once again I advise u to do your research Sidorenko has 542 CONFIRMED kills- got it- CONFIRMED kills with an estimated 1079 total kills half that couldn't be confirmed due to the nature of snipers in warfare. Guys like Vasily Zaytsev where famous because he was the poster boy for the soviet propaganda on snipers not because he had the most confirmed kills. Lots of red army snipers got way more confirmed kills than Zaytsev. Do some research before u answer back and u will see.
No, they were not confirmed, only ONE historian made those claims, and he was the same historian that made the claim that serveral German pilots did not have as many kills as they did, when in fact they had more. Get back to me when you have PROOF of confirmed kills, not some "information" you got from Google or Bing. Historical proof, like Zaytsev or Häyhä both have...
@EvilxMerlin Wrong-The information I've taken has been backed by several Historical writers who saw fit to put it in their books I will list their names if you like. These same writers also back Hayha's claims of confirmed kills. If you are so right give me the name of this so-called lone historian that mad the 500+ claim and I will research him myself. Until then your claim is as good as mine
No, its not wrong, provide ONE author that has CONFIRMED kill information on either of the two Russians. Why are they not more famous in Russia? As for Häyhä, go read A Sniper: The Skills, the Weapons, and the Experiences, Out of Nowhere: A History of the Military Sniper, Finland at War 1939-45. All of which say he probably killed 2x that number, but historically documented at 505 confirmed. So where are these books you have "read"...
Yeah but we don't have factual documentation on how many Häyhä actually killed with the submachine guns he used. So much like the supposed Russian snipers that killed "thousands" until its fully documented, we just don't know.
@EvilxMerlin no there was a russian sniper who had 702 confirmed kills and around 300 of simo kills where with a machinegun so he was acutally a very good guerrilla but not such a super sniper
@IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA Tell his name, there is no records of an soviet sniper with such amount of kills. Also the 500 kills Simo Häyhä did were made only with the Pystykorva rifle he had.
@Becouse that's how many shooters do it, you can easily focus on the target with one eye, and keep the other eye open for peripheral vision, also I seem to recall that it helps the brain with depth-perception even if you don't look through the sights with both eyes. Have you ever tried shooting in a more serious way, or are your only experience with guns through movies and games?
@notavib they tested it at short range... the bullet achieves its maximum energy AFTER during flight. for example, at nearly 1 mile the bullet's energy is way more higher than shooting someone in a head with shotgun from 1 inch. mythbusters can't make their tests 100% accurate... think about it.
i watched this video for the first time in 2008. now i have watched this video maybe i time every day. now its 2011 and i have always loved this video!
@goldbullet50 its a freak accident but it is plausible. tho its quite impossible in modern scopes theres more glass and its thicker but the older scopes were more thinner glass less of it too however there is a small hole sort of in the middle of the older scopes a bullet has to push all the glass through kind of but it is quite possible to send one bullet down a WWII scope. its just 1 in a million shot :P the fans in mythbusters had adam and jamie retest it and it was plausible =o
@tigresssharplesl And of course it depends about bullet. If it's .22lr, it would be completely impossible, but some .50 BMG would blow the scope so bad :)
@yahbud yeh alot of snipers wuld rip them off because theres actually 3 clips and that last one is hardly ever used by anyone because ur gun slips off ur shoulder when the strap is clipped into that one. its annoying to have that clip jingling around when ur running and stuff.
its possible but depends on the type of scope being used. i cant remember the details but it can be done with a high caliber bullet and shooting through the right scope
This guy was a great actor. We watched this clip in USMC basic training to illustrate how to properly hold a rifle while standing (calm, loose forearm grip). The reason he pressed the scope to his eye is because that is a "shot-through eye appliance" attached to the back of the scope by the special effects guys. It contains a small explosive and that gory patch that sticks to his eye when Private Jackson shoots him.
@TheGunning63 how the hell would you know,seems to me that your a cod nerd who knows everything to guns. your retarded there is no such shit as a 'extended scope glove'
@crunkman24 unless you have something of the .50 caliber round of course it would penetrate, but the springfield's 30.06 bullet wouldt because it would break into shrapnel
he isnt too fast or too furious now.
nazizombieahallic10 1 day ago
WWII Online .com , check it out, get in the fight. Trial is ready to go.
XoomXoom 2 days ago 4
the movie is named saving private ryan
123annde 1 week ago
Bullseye!! Right in the eye!!
ZombieBoy768 1 week ago
Epic film..
BlackOpzAmerica 1 week ago
@ the tomswampy, it is possible history channel reenacted the shot hathcock made using a period accurate scope, mythbusters used a modern scope that used more lenses.
TheCamoKiller93 2 weeks ago
Yeah, what about the blood on the wall ???
BubbleMega96 2 weeks ago
any one notice the blood painted on the wall at :58
iceberg931 2 weeks ago
hey its van diesel on the groung :D
AJSwisscool98 2 weeks ago
Off-topic compaired to the rest of this 'discussion' : BOOOOM HEADSHOT
MyEpicSniper 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how is it impossible...the number of glass elements in the scope, all of which are not flat but convex, they would simply deflect or deform the round and change is trajectory.
I know myth busters are not an exhaustive source byut they di try twice and failed to make it work. The rifle would also not likely be completely still either.
smilo996 2 weeks ago
german sniper look like me
hellq6 2 weeks ago
Not possiple. Zek: Myth Busters...
TheTomswampy 2 weeks ago
@TheTomswampy how is it impossible?
veedubberPs3 2 weeks ago
What's name that gun, who have that killed nazist sniper?
BartexooC 2 weeks ago
@BartexooC american: springfield germaan: kar98k i guess
veedubberPs3 2 weeks ago
thums up if you were expecting to see a killcam =P i did
quintensky 2 weeks ago
lol I just wanna make something cealr, u cant shoot a sniper with ur eye too close to the scope, or u gonn get hurt, real bad
XgoldbergvspredatorX 3 weeks ago
how can those rifles work when that wet?
SimplyAsunder 3 weeks ago in playlist Weapons - Sniper
for anyone who is interested and didn't knew it yet; this is a scene from the movie "saving private Ryan"
MrSchumacherfan 3 weeks ago
This shot is impossible to make
Beefcake771 3 weeks ago
@Beefcake771 Quite possible, actually. Been tried and proven on Mythbusters. With a scope from that era combined with a FMJ bullet, it'll cut right through the scope.
alexkartashov47 3 weeks ago
nice
Keith459001 3 weeks ago
M'ericuh
Chrome611 3 weeks ago
0:53 for $ shot.
bricksquad9552 4 weeks ago
Actually, we can say that is a great acting performance from Vin Diesel.
Aloz50 1 month ago
eyeshot...
theyanys98 1 month ago
Headshot!
Ltzmogus221 1 month ago
Carlos Hathcock a US marine corps gunnery sniper ACTUALLY did this shot on hill 55. Hathcock took the NVA's gun as a trophy but it was stolen later from the armory. now thats an achievement. what a badass!!!
bobvanka 1 month ago
WOW SUPER SHOOT....TOM HANKS SUPER ARTİST
TheLeonidas53 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheLeonidas53 1 month ago
Dis is a good movie it's called "saving private Ryan"
Jp43620 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
want MW3? try giveaways on verizz.info !!
hurry up!! MW3 and GameStop gift card are waiting !
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
multinorbert13 1 month ago
eyeshot?
vincent860906 1 month ago
That soldier who died (I forgot his name, sergeant maybe?) is the actor Vin Diesel lol xD
mineCraf0 1 month ago
boom, headshot
RallyXRacer7 1 month ago
@RallyXRacer7 its boom eye shot
MrJusttroy 1 month ago
''we got em, stay down'' *steve bleeds out* epic friend
L4d2d0ZZ1 1 month ago
most stupid
G41M 1 month ago
I'm german, but I love that guy !
Epic sniping action!
RoronoaZoroSensei 1 month ago
L’œil collé à la lunette de visée... Dommage pour cette inhérence..
kukrapok35 1 month ago
My favorite part of my favorite movie
Fucku856 1 month ago
perfeckt film
motorcuahmed 1 month ago
FATALITY XDDDDDDD
Angelito15Crack 1 month ago
look at that DICE, no scope glint
ZekeMagnum 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice :D
sebojazbec765 1 month ago
Nice shot?
You do realise that this is just a movie, right?
MrMokeybusiness 1 month ago
@MrMokeybusiness YOU are the dumb by asking this stupid question.
PsychoMaTiic 1 month ago
Jackson sexy beast:)
MandyPandyL 1 month ago
Sniping is a good job, mate!
Tarik360 1 month ago
LOL HACKER xD
i love this movie
iDennis95 1 month ago
Good Move
majorahsan94 2 months ago
Shaving Ryans Privates
SgtDeepshit 2 months ago
also the russian pu scope the nva was using is not as long as a modren scope. when they tryed to debunk gunny hathcocks shot they used a scope that had more lenses in it and was twice as long.
sass225 2 months ago
Screw if the shots impossible or not. This guy is one bad ass. The best in the entire movie!
ESR1991 2 months ago
Headshot!
songoku552 2 months ago
VOLLTREFFER!
mistersatinlover 2 months ago
mythbusters proved this to be impossible.. =/
TheHenirik 2 months ago
@TheHenirik Actually, this shot is very possible with the scopes made in that era. Combination scopes did not come into common practice until much later. Even during the Vietnam War, Carlos Hathcock made a similiar shot to this. It is not impossible, just difficult and requiring perfect accuracy and angle. In fact during this last conflict in Iraq a Marine Countersniper made a similiar shot but he was using a larger weapon with a higher grain round.
PictishPrince 2 months ago 7
@PictishPrince thank you for your good answer =)
TheHenirik 2 months ago
@PictishPrince
Actually this scene is based on Hathcock encounter with a nva sniper.
look it up in wiki...
falerdog 2 months ago
@PictishPrince watched mythbusters?
bulletinyurass 1 month ago
@bulletinyurass I did, and also several other attempts to recreate the Hathcock shot. They all initially used compound lens scopes. When they used a correct scope, shot angularly instead of head on at a range, and used a correct sight picture (target in shadow with no refraction) they were able to recreate the shot in several instances. The shot is possible, just not a common occurence as the correct variables must be in play to achieve it.
PictishPrince 1 month ago 2
@PictishPrince the stupid thing about most war movies, they are sooo allied propaganda-ish, proper german soldiers (waffen SS, Wehrmacht) where much more trained and skilled than american soldiers, also in tactics. i also heard few stories from veterans. in these movies all americans, .. are shown as heroes, but in real life most of them got slaughterd by the germans.
bulletinyurass 1 month ago
@bulletinyurass Remember the most sniper kills in WW2 goes to Russians, and most of them were Women. In WW1 it was Germany who registered more sniper kills. Spanish-American war was the US. Civil War was the Union, War of 1812 was the US, Napoleonic wars was Russia, And the War of Revolution it was the irregular forces of the Continental Army. Sniping has been considered bad for a long time, only since Vietnam has it been looked at as a good way of fighting.
PictishPrince 1 month ago
@PictishPrince the most kills were from men and there were few women that got over just 200 most top snipers were over what 400 besides it's not the kills that matter
MrDip02 1 month ago
@PictishPrince
Um, no in WW2, the record belonged to the Finns.Simo Häyhä with 505 confirmed kills. No one else even comes close.
EvilxMerlin 1 month ago 11
@EvilxMerlin dude u need to do a bit more research the Red army had by far the most deadly snipers in WW2 look up manes like "Vasilij (Basil) Shalvovich Kvachantiradze," "Ivan Mikhaylovich Sidorenko," and "Mikhail Surkov" all these guys got way over 500 sniper kills. In fact lots of soviet snipers reached 500+ kills during WW2. Surkov got 702 confirmed kills (highest confirmed kills i know of) and Sidorenko became Russia's #1 sniper with 1079 sniper kills 542 confirmed. Twice as much as Simo!
JerodimusPrime 2 weeks ago
@JerodimusPrime
Um, none of those were CONFIRMED. Thats the operative word here. Mikhail Surkov does NOT have 702 confirmed kills nor does Sidorenko. Else they would have been quite a lot more famous in Russia. CONFIRMED. Got it?
EvilxMerlin 2 weeks ago
@EvilxMerlin once again I advise u to do your research Sidorenko has 542 CONFIRMED kills- got it- CONFIRMED kills with an estimated 1079 total kills half that couldn't be confirmed due to the nature of snipers in warfare. Guys like Vasily Zaytsev where famous because he was the poster boy for the soviet propaganda on snipers not because he had the most confirmed kills. Lots of red army snipers got way more confirmed kills than Zaytsev. Do some research before u answer back and u will see.
JerodimusPrime 2 weeks ago
@JerodimusPrime
No, they were not confirmed, only ONE historian made those claims, and he was the same historian that made the claim that serveral German pilots did not have as many kills as they did, when in fact they had more. Get back to me when you have PROOF of confirmed kills, not some "information" you got from Google or Bing. Historical proof, like Zaytsev or Häyhä both have...
EvilxMerlin 2 weeks ago
@EvilxMerlin Wrong-The information I've taken has been backed by several Historical writers who saw fit to put it in their books I will list their names if you like. These same writers also back Hayha's claims of confirmed kills. If you are so right give me the name of this so-called lone historian that mad the 500+ claim and I will research him myself. Until then your claim is as good as mine
JerodimusPrime 2 weeks ago
@JerodimusPrime
No, its not wrong, provide ONE author that has CONFIRMED kill information on either of the two Russians. Why are they not more famous in Russia? As for Häyhä, go read A Sniper: The Skills, the Weapons, and the Experiences, Out of Nowhere: A History of the Military Sniper, Finland at War 1939-45. All of which say he probably killed 2x that number, but historically documented at 505 confirmed. So where are these books you have "read"...
EvilxMerlin 2 weeks ago
@EvilxMerlin and add another 200 with a sub machine gun if i remember right
souldragon121 3 days ago
@souldragon121
Yeah but we don't have factual documentation on how many Häyhä actually killed with the submachine guns he used. So much like the supposed Russian snipers that killed "thousands" until its fully documented, we just don't know.
EvilxMerlin 3 days ago
@EvilxMerlin no there was a russian sniper who had 702 confirmed kills and around 300 of simo kills where with a machinegun so he was acutally a very good guerrilla but not such a super sniper
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 1 day ago
@IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA Tell his name, there is no records of an soviet sniper with such amount of kills. Also the 500 kills Simo Häyhä did were made only with the Pystykorva rifle he had.
cappearma 1 day ago
@cappearma The 200 Suomi KP kills were not counted to the confirmed sniper kills.
cappearma 1 day ago
@EvilxMerlin mikhail surkov 702
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 1 day ago
@IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA
No, there isn't. They are not confirmed kills. The Russians cannot even determine how many people Nikolay Yakovlevich Ilyin actually killed.
EvilxMerlin 1 day ago
@IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA
Simo Häyhä has an estimated 705...
EvilxMerlin 1 day ago
@EvilxMerlin you cant count machinegun as if they where sniper
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 1 day ago
@IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA
Just like you cannot consider non-documented or unconfirmed kills.Simo Häyhä hold the record for the most sniper kills still.
EvilxMerlin 1 day ago
@PictishPrince im kind of late to this argument but i doubt that this shot was deliberate, it was just luck it traveled through the german scope
veedubberPs3 2 weeks ago
@PictishPrince
Not after changing scopes on a sighted-in rifle, as Reiben inexplicably did in this scene.
SansAuthoritas 2 weeks ago
@TheHenirik soo?
saverlater123 2 months ago
impossible
RmSlayR 2 months ago 2
I really hate vin diesel
pepinozinanasshole 2 months ago
@pepinozinanasshole
bad actor indeed
woobinda65 1 month ago
wow fuckin wow best sniper
SHARKSHOP007 2 months ago
Movie name??
gangstacedi 2 months ago
@gangstacedi i believe its saving private ryan
IIcyTom 2 months ago
@gangstacedi
saving private ryan!
regan5us 2 months ago
@gangstacedi Saving Private Ryan
moonlord9005 2 months ago
:D i have seen in TV
sniperman126 2 months ago
i heard a one of a U.S snipers did that trick in vietnam;]
karolek9269 2 months ago
that's my fav scene from this movie i think :) and my favorite movie too.
macix12 3 months ago
why are both the snipers eyes open FAIL!!!
ducducduc2 3 months ago
@Becouse that's how many shooters do it, you can easily focus on the target with one eye, and keep the other eye open for peripheral vision, also I seem to recall that it helps the brain with depth-perception even if you don't look through the sights with both eyes. Have you ever tried shooting in a more serious way, or are your only experience with guns through movies and games?
ForkyStick 1 month ago
This is not possible they tessted it on Mythbusters :P
notavib 3 months ago
@notavib haha thats wut i wuz thinkin too!
nicolasdagenai 3 months ago
@notavib they tested it at short range... the bullet achieves its maximum energy AFTER during flight. for example, at nearly 1 mile the bullet's energy is way more higher than shooting someone in a head with shotgun from 1 inch. mythbusters can't make their tests 100% accurate... think about it.
87vetal87 3 months ago
That german guy has beautyful blue eyes.
May he R.I.P.
woobinda65 3 months ago
@woobinda65 women....
AbrudanDorin 1 month ago
@AbrudanDorin
???
woobinda65 1 month ago
no! dom! what happened did you lose the race or get caught jacking tractor trailers
whatdirectionisthat 4 months ago
i watched this video for the first time in 2008. now i have watched this video maybe i time every day. now its 2011 and i have always loved this video!
blaCops99 4 months ago
a classic xD
blaCops99 4 months ago 20
Saving private Ryan
TheAlexander97 4 months ago
Actually, the bullet would've stuck inside the scope
goldbullet50 5 months ago
@goldbullet50 its a freak accident but it is plausible. tho its quite impossible in modern scopes theres more glass and its thicker but the older scopes were more thinner glass less of it too however there is a small hole sort of in the middle of the older scopes a bullet has to push all the glass through kind of but it is quite possible to send one bullet down a WWII scope. its just 1 in a million shot :P the fans in mythbusters had adam and jamie retest it and it was plausible =o
tigresssharplesl 4 months ago
@tigresssharplesl And of course it depends about bullet. If it's .22lr, it would be completely impossible, but some .50 BMG would blow the scope so bad :)
goldbullet50 4 months ago
carlos hathcock shot...
wesley1532882 5 months ago
Armer Carpaso (keine Ahnung wie man den schreibt) Soldat James Ryan is einfach ein guter Film und vorallem die Szene.
andy93jurak 5 months ago
lol its not a bipod its the clip for his rifle strap xD
yahbud 5 months ago 25
Comment removed
blaCops99 5 months ago
@yahbud yeh alot of snipers wuld rip them off because theres actually 3 clips and that last one is hardly ever used by anyone because ur gun slips off ur shoulder when the strap is clipped into that one. its annoying to have that clip jingling around when ur running and stuff.
yahbud 5 months ago
wtf wowow dam
MrFlip1997 6 months ago
the shot got the eye on the scope???!!!
fakeboby86 6 months ago
Bulls-eye!
Jaychiz104 6 months ago
was this from band of brothers??
29yoface 6 months ago
Comment removed
idunwannadie 6 months ago
@29yoface Its from 'Saving Private Ryan'..
idunwannadie 6 months ago
@idunwannadie ya but tom hanks is in the movie i never some him in this scene
29yoface 6 months ago
@29yoface nevermind i saw the video again my bad
29yoface 6 months ago
Fire hit! MOVE!!!
Lakanen90 6 months ago
holy shit! what a nice fuckin' shot :) gg thumb up guys
HauntedRomania 6 months ago
@HauntedRomania no fag
qwertyaderp 6 months ago
Znam ten film :D
TheJumperSW 6 months ago
the german sniper need to move. he can't be in the same spot after shoting..
olaalskardig 6 months ago
i thought he would run, then jump doing a 580 on air, throwing a knife, no scope someone while haveing a cooking granade...
StrfightProductionz 7 months ago
Save privat rian ... Sir yes Sir
Love this movie.Kritikal Hit.
xXJohnnyXxSFJ 7 months ago
its possible but depends on the type of scope being used. i cant remember the details but it can be done with a high caliber bullet and shooting through the right scope
metallica4432 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have seen that movie it's nice
Razzalmehus 7 months ago
it isnt possible to shoot trough the scope but it looks very nice!
kampfsack2009 7 months ago
@kampfsack2009
Oddly enough, it is possible, and it actually happened, though it was in Vietnam not in Normandy.
2210ethan 7 months ago
poned!!
cranbrookkid97 7 months ago
This guy was a great actor. We watched this clip in USMC basic training to illustrate how to properly hold a rifle while standing (calm, loose forearm grip). The reason he pressed the scope to his eye is because that is a "shot-through eye appliance" attached to the back of the scope by the special effects guys. It contains a small explosive and that gory patch that sticks to his eye when Private Jackson shoots him.
SKUSMC 7 months ago
i saw this a couple of years back and i was in the age where you can watch a movie 500 times and wanna watch it 500 more. so I know every word :)
TheNaziboy007 7 months ago
@erikgiles1 Rifles*
TheSherlock96 7 months ago
Best WarMovie Ever !!
N30NBLu3 7 months ago
that was a good movie
urantay 7 months ago
saving private ryan was a GREAT movie in its day
KamikazeScarecrows 7 months ago
if you put the scope of a rifle in your eye.. when you shot.. you shot also you eye away ;)
PXttx 8 months ago
crappy actor ... if that caliber wuz a lil bit bigger that would ben one shot - kill ur self and the other guy.... or atleast a black eye :)
PixelCraftLTU 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=KnYAC2_hnKg
''SAVING MY PRIVATES" (2011 - tom hanks)
a MUST see video. you need a good stomach - added yesterday
MrChatItOut 8 months ago
THUMS UP FOR NO REASON! : )
blaCops99 8 months ago
The german sniper has the scope right against his eye which he shouldn't be doing
MrBen62 9 months ago
@MrBen62 its called a extended scope glove. the scope is not against he eye. it blocks side view light. everybody is a pro on you tube numb nuts.
TheGunning63 9 months ago
@TheGunning63 how the hell would you know,seems to me that your a cod nerd who knows everything to guns. your retarded there is no such shit as a 'extended scope glove'
MrBen62 9 months ago
the reality is that an ordinary sniper bullet can't penetrate a scope. the mythbusters even tested it and proved it wrong
dakiler2028 9 months ago
@dakiler2028 Actually, it did go trough - but they had to use an AP bullet, all the other bullets almost got trough.
dacel88 9 months ago
@dacel88 no lol they should have used a 50 cal
dakiler2028 9 months ago
@dakiler2028 an they used different snipers buddy, it would go through
crunkman24 9 months ago
@crunkman24 unless you have something of the .50 caliber round of course it would penetrate, but the springfield's 30.06 bullet wouldt because it would break into shrapnel
dakiler2028 8 months ago
i love snipers
blaCops99 9 months ago
what a cute little bipod at 0:49.
blaCops99 9 months ago 34
@blaCops99
Pff. Whatever! That bipod KICKS ASS
Ipunchbeezintheface 8 months ago
@blaCops99
Pf, whatever! That bi-pod kicks ass!
Ipunchbeezintheface 8 months ago
@blaCops99
Think it was just the sling swivel.
ParamoreWorshipper 7 months ago
@blaCops99 thats funny but its a sling mount
916gerald 7 months ago
@blaCops99 no that is the strap holder
Flogy96 6 months ago
@blaCops99 its not a bipod
SgtMayopants 5 months ago
@blaCops99 well, thats not a bipod..
fabiehm95 5 months ago
Now he's FUBAR hehehe
DionysusFTW 9 months ago
pwned
c5corvette100 9 months ago
good shot! i like snipers!
jodetepelotudo 9 months ago
That German did a good thing :(
seath64 9 months ago
that german waited too long!
MrTho97 9 months ago
nahh looks like a hitmarker for me
typerfel 10 months ago
Best war film ever! R.I.P. james ryans brothers :^)
Lacki7 10 months ago
lol i have this movie
joethegamer444 10 months ago
ouch!!
jrmcf1 10 months ago
In the real life German sniper would win.
At the D day the german sniper killed tons of americans.
The film is good.
profalconey3 10 months ago