Na verdade é um pouco chato ouvir isso mais na interpretação de um grande violinista como Kogan consigo escutar isso tão bonito. Kogan Heifetz Oistrakh os tres estão em um outro nivel de violinistas
@stealthedscout NOBLE FRIEND, I'M AFRAID IT'S NOT MY FAULT. THE CAPS-LOCK ON MY COMPUTER IS ACTUALLY NOT OPERATIONAL SO EVERYTHING COMES OUT LIKE THIS. BUT FRIEND- LET US ENJOY THIS MASTERFUL PLAYING
@Amarynthine well, if you know anything about tropes, that is using fragments of the row, the first half of the row (G Bb D F# A C) you may notice sets up a perfect V7-i cadence. Berg was also a brilliant tonal composer, prior to dodecaphony. If an amateur like me noticed that, Berg certainly could figure out how to use it. =)
I am soooo glad that you like this work, but please don't misunderstand, there is not one moment in ANY portion of this work is a-tonal! This work is incredibly tonal--but using extended and chromatic relations. If you think just in terms of cords -- I, IV, V you'll never hear it . . .
@dimmii1001 En kyllä tajua sanaakaan, mutta itse asiassa Bergin viulukonsertto on paljon mahtavampi kuin yksikään Bachin tai Mozartin sävellys, mitenkään aliarvioimatta kahta jälkimmäistä herraa.
@poo72 The fact that Berg adopted Schoenberg's dodecaphonic system, proves that he is not on the same level of Bach or Mozart. Bach and Mozart followed no school and didn't need other artists for direction. Berg was a fine composer, but his output does not even compare to the innovations and sheer quantity of masterpieces produced by Bach and Mozart. No-one would ever claim that Alban Berg was as important to the development of music as Beethoven. To say he was as important as B&M is absurd
@Neongrapes You're wrong. Both Bach and Mozart followed closely the schools that they were versed in. Mozart particularly, did very little to develop music as a whole. Nothing he wrote broke any boundaries. That's not to say that he didn't write brilliant music, he did, but he didn't innovate it, and he didn't develop it in the same way that Beethoven did. Also, the development of atonal music was by Schoenberg, Webern and Berg. All three developed it at the same time.
@TheNeonKnight not quite true. the forms of his time were very rigid. though his innovations were subtle, to disregard them is a mistake. To say nothing of his contributions to the German Opera. And I could go on about Bach's abandonment of continuo. Don't get me wrong, I agree with your point, but the fact that people feel it needs to be debated is borderline offensive. I could point out as many flaws in Neongrapes' argument. After all Mozart sought out Haydn,as he and Beethoven did Bach.
@cnmaster01 I guess you're right, but Mozart's innovations were so miniscule in comparison to the ground-breaking development of the Second Viennese School that to say Berg shouldn't be considered a 'revolutionary' is absurd. I guess I was just exaggerating my point for effect, Mozart did have his innovations but they were small in my view, and what Shoenberg + co did was to completely abandon the previous school of thought and develop their own - a rather huge innovation.
@TheNeonKnight well, we have to try to think about their context. in only a short span of under a hundred years we moved from the horse to the jet plane. compared to that change, the invention of the saddle and carriage seem minuscule, but were profoundly important at the time.
@TheNeonKnight In Fact, it was a period of innovation. Saying that Schoenberg created alone that music is also absurd. He was influenced by the artistic novelty of the 20th century. Kandinsky and co created Der Blaue Reiter and Kirchner Die Brücke, two expressionists movements which certainly inspired the atonal school. Schoenberg wrote articles about that new aesthetic. It's very interesting to see how their painting are musical and create a vision of the rhythm quite close to his music.
I can hear some of the enjoyable parts in this music. It just always leaves me longing for something more in a way, feels sort of incomplete. There are bits when I just think 'Ah he's going to end the tension with a soaring harmony, here it comes...' and it never does.
Just my personal opinion, I'm really not slating anyone who loves it. So please don't slate me.
But eaxactly what you described is just the wonderful matter about that music. Ever heard about why he wrote the concert? That is because a young has died at the age of 18. So he just cannot use harmonic cadences.
@TwilightFalls I've listened to this twice in several years, and I also can't see any value of this music whatsoever. It says absolutely nothing to me.
I feel the same way, kind of. I love composers from Palestrina through Brahms and Elliott Carter, but this piece always leaves me a little unsatisfied. Berg often sets up this amazing and never resolves it (and I don't just mean harmonically) in a way that I personally find satisfying. I still love it though!
@TwilightFalls I think that's the point ! Berg hints at the familiar, yet never really goes there. That is what makes the music so haunting and beautiful. I thing the longing that you feel was the composers intention.
wow! This a a special treat. I've always thought that Kogan's Berg was the best of the best. This recording does not disappoint. Thanks for the Great post.
i think he's (Berg) so romantic
pavobaxter 2 months ago
Oh shit! I think I'm deaf after hearing this :(
Ikdushejijniej 5 months ago
Na verdade é um pouco chato ouvir isso mais na interpretação de um grande violinista como Kogan consigo escutar isso tão bonito. Kogan Heifetz Oistrakh os tres estão em um outro nivel de violinistas
jeffersonfsoares 8 months ago
subtitled "in a memory of an angel"
Beautiful!
SuperLucy1312 8 months ago
1 people who dislike ! He like only the Radevsky's March !
Bugleur 9 months ago
this concert is kind a weird......... i cant listen it complete.... i cant! is so atonal, a strange combination...
alayanai 10 months ago
it seems to me tonal music. it s not too complex as they say. there are many repeating sounds in it and What is the difference between tonal ?
13Orcun 10 months ago
I don't enjoy the music, but using twelve tone method and making it sound somewhat tonal is amazing! :)
qwertyasdyaln 10 months ago
This is just terrible.
BELACSAMOHT 10 months ago
Comment removed
chesslunatik 1 year ago
@stealthedscout LINK IT PROPERLY SMARTY PANTS
bopkick5 1 year ago
@stealthedscout NOBLE FRIEND, I'M AFRAID IT'S NOT MY FAULT. THE CAPS-LOCK ON MY COMPUTER IS ACTUALLY NOT OPERATIONAL SO EVERYTHING COMES OUT LIKE THIS. BUT FRIEND- LET US ENJOY THIS MASTERFUL PLAYING
bopkick5 1 year ago
amazing interpretation
nmagko 1 year ago
APPARENTLY THERE'S A VERY RARE EARLY RECORDING OF FRITZ KREISLER PLAYING THIS CONCERTO.
DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT?
bopkick5 1 year ago
how the hell do you build a comprehensible musical phrase out of a twelve tone piece?!?! Impressive!
Amarynthine 1 year ago
@Amarynthine well, if you know anything about tropes, that is using fragments of the row, the first half of the row (G Bb D F# A C) you may notice sets up a perfect V7-i cadence. Berg was also a brilliant tonal composer, prior to dodecaphony. If an amateur like me noticed that, Berg certainly could figure out how to use it. =)
cnmaster01 11 months ago
Such abstract work... Vivid and unclear movement... I just cannot fathom how this came to be.
backyardbaseballdj 1 year ago
Wonderful!
markzemusic 1 year ago
I am soooo glad that you like this work, but please don't misunderstand, there is not one moment in ANY portion of this work is a-tonal! This work is incredibly tonal--but using extended and chromatic relations. If you think just in terms of cords -- I, IV, V you'll never hear it . . .
callmeBe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
kogan is a biggest cock sucker
07jungh 1 year ago
Thanks so very, very much for posting this!
OriginalMoonbeam 2 years ago
So beautiful and at the same time atonal. Incredible combination! Berg is one of the greatest, he can be compared to Bach and Motzart.
poo72 2 years ago 12
@poo72 MOZART
pianoloverforever 1 year ago
@pianoloverforever Thank you for the correction! Next time I remember that it's written Motarzt
poo72 1 year ago
@poo72
quasi quasi lo definiamo superiore a Bach e a Mozart, che ne dici?
Vai a cacare, cretino ignorante!
dimmii1001 1 year ago
@dimmii1001 En kyllä tajua sanaakaan, mutta itse asiassa Bergin viulukonsertto on paljon mahtavampi kuin yksikään Bachin tai Mozartin sävellys, mitenkään aliarvioimatta kahta jälkimmäistä herraa.
poo72 1 year ago
Comment removed
dimmii1001 1 year ago
@poo72 i wouldn't call mozart one of the greatest
rancodanca 1 year ago
@poo72 The fact that Berg adopted Schoenberg's dodecaphonic system, proves that he is not on the same level of Bach or Mozart. Bach and Mozart followed no school and didn't need other artists for direction. Berg was a fine composer, but his output does not even compare to the innovations and sheer quantity of masterpieces produced by Bach and Mozart. No-one would ever claim that Alban Berg was as important to the development of music as Beethoven. To say he was as important as B&M is absurd
Neongrapes 1 year ago
@Neongrapes You're wrong. Both Bach and Mozart followed closely the schools that they were versed in. Mozart particularly, did very little to develop music as a whole. Nothing he wrote broke any boundaries. That's not to say that he didn't write brilliant music, he did, but he didn't innovate it, and he didn't develop it in the same way that Beethoven did. Also, the development of atonal music was by Schoenberg, Webern and Berg. All three developed it at the same time.
TheNeonKnight 11 months ago
@TheNeonKnight not quite true. the forms of his time were very rigid. though his innovations were subtle, to disregard them is a mistake. To say nothing of his contributions to the German Opera. And I could go on about Bach's abandonment of continuo. Don't get me wrong, I agree with your point, but the fact that people feel it needs to be debated is borderline offensive. I could point out as many flaws in Neongrapes' argument. After all Mozart sought out Haydn,as he and Beethoven did Bach.
cnmaster01 11 months ago
@cnmaster01 I guess you're right, but Mozart's innovations were so miniscule in comparison to the ground-breaking development of the Second Viennese School that to say Berg shouldn't be considered a 'revolutionary' is absurd. I guess I was just exaggerating my point for effect, Mozart did have his innovations but they were small in my view, and what Shoenberg + co did was to completely abandon the previous school of thought and develop their own - a rather huge innovation.
TheNeonKnight 11 months ago
@TheNeonKnight well, we have to try to think about their context. in only a short span of under a hundred years we moved from the horse to the jet plane. compared to that change, the invention of the saddle and carriage seem minuscule, but were profoundly important at the time.
cnmaster01 11 months ago
@TheNeonKnight In Fact, it was a period of innovation. Saying that Schoenberg created alone that music is also absurd. He was influenced by the artistic novelty of the 20th century. Kandinsky and co created Der Blaue Reiter and Kirchner Die Brücke, two expressionists movements which certainly inspired the atonal school. Schoenberg wrote articles about that new aesthetic. It's very interesting to see how their painting are musical and create a vision of the rhythm quite close to his music.
gabriel94220 10 months ago
I can hear some of the enjoyable parts in this music. It just always leaves me longing for something more in a way, feels sort of incomplete. There are bits when I just think 'Ah he's going to end the tension with a soaring harmony, here it comes...' and it never does.
Just my personal opinion, I'm really not slating anyone who loves it. So please don't slate me.
TwilightFalls 2 years ago 12
But eaxactly what you described is just the wonderful matter about that music. Ever heard about why he wrote the concert? That is because a young has died at the age of 18. So he just cannot use harmonic cadences.
lukred 2 years ago 2
I'm not questioning his motives, the music just doesn't speak to me.
TwilightFalls 2 years ago 3
@TwilightFalls I've listened to this twice in several years, and I also can't see any value of this music whatsoever. It says absolutely nothing to me.
TheTucsonJeff 1 year ago
I feel the same way, kind of. I love composers from Palestrina through Brahms and Elliott Carter, but this piece always leaves me a little unsatisfied. Berg often sets up this amazing and never resolves it (and I don't just mean harmonically) in a way that I personally find satisfying. I still love it though!
SubalternSpeaking 2 years ago
@TwilightFalls
Don't worry. The incompleteness that you adress, was very much part of the modernist programme.
CaptainBluebear08 1 year ago
@TwilightFalls It was intended as a requiem. what soaring harmony comes out of death?
cnmaster01 1 year ago 2
@TwilightFalls That eternal wait makes for great music too.
Hyardacil 10 months ago
@TwilightFalls I think that's the point ! Berg hints at the familiar, yet never really goes there. That is what makes the music so haunting and beautiful. I thing the longing that you feel was the composers intention.
iamalittlespy 6 months ago
@TwilightFalls Yeah, it's the soul of the dodecaphony!
RufusLoacker 5 months ago
Very interesting to hear how Alban Berg was played in old Russia. I find Kogan's interpretation quite romantic, but convincing.
Thanks.
CaptainBluebear08 2 years ago
Да, это - лучшее!
IrinaDeva 2 years ago
Very very good.Still prefer Suk-Ancerl,and Szigeti-Mitropoulos(live).
raanan17 3 years ago
wow! This a a special treat. I've always thought that Kogan's Berg was the best of the best. This recording does not disappoint. Thanks for the Great post.
calloffthedogs 3 years ago 4