@156sbr My name is not "roach;" it's Eric. You give me the kind of respect you'd damn well want for yourself, no matter what your (undeserved) opinion of me is, and you'll get it back from me. You forget, Nellie Oleson that you can't buy respect.
So, how do you convince the private sector to hire? That's the key. People talk about downsizing the government and reducing federal jobs. What they don't think about is that, if those same people can't get private jobs and are forced onto unemployment, the government will lose money anyway. How do you get the private sector to hire those people without forcing them to by law? That's a serious conundrum that nobody's found an answer to.
@156sbr Oh, I'm "worthless, no shame filthy beggar"? I'm not the one going in circles - NELLIE OLESON! Go get 1,50cc of Thorazine! Bound to knock you flat on your back where you belong!
Get this through your concussed skull, blondie: I'M NOT LISTENING TO YOU! GIVE IT UP!
@156sbr Leave it alone! It's a dead issue, almost like 156sbr! Only a crybaby would refuse to let something as trivial and pointless as this issue fester. You're only making yourself look like the fool you know you are!
@156sbr Everything's a non-=answer, if it's not what "Nellie Oleson" wants to read. You'd call it a "non-answer" even if it was coming from Warren Buffet, so your opinion is meaningless.
Come up to New York. Meet me. Prove to me that you're every bit as good as Eric Clapton or Terry Kath from Chicago. Then, I may listen to your ignorant psychobabble. Until then, SHUT UP!
@156sbr I DID NOT SAY THAT! YOU DID! AND, IT NOT THE TRUTH AT ALL!
I made sure to write that in words you could understand - with print you'd be likely to read, since you're so convinced I'm not legally blind - implying you've got worse vision than I am.
@156sbr That quote of Roosevelt's was directed at you, not me. You may have worn the uniform, but you're the one whose never known victory nor defeat. I've known both, and I'm proud. Proud that I've succeeded at becoming a musician (who HAS earned his way in the world) and proud that I've survived having failed at many things. One is to talk people like you away from the ledge.
You're not celebrating any victories, because you're reaching out to no-one. But, it's not too late.
@156sbr And, you're exploding like a sun going nova. Go jump in the Colorado River before you incinerate the entire western world. And, take your pretzel maker with you, so we're through with your twisted banter.
Mr. 1r56sbr would like to destroy everything and everybody in society, kind of like the creators & promoters of this garbage video. He's self-loathing, and he thinks everybody should feel the same way - kind of like Rush Limbaugh. What does he have to give to the world? Nothing but lies.
Obama is medicine. He's the kind of medicine that people usually hate to swallow because of its bitter taste. When they're cured, they pretend they always loved it. Nasty medicine, cold shower and veggies!
@156sbr I never said that. I said that I work as a musician. But, 666S-son-of-a-B-R has made a career out of yellow(-bellied) journalism. He's the shameless one, not that anybody could ever tell him. The Arizona desert has fried his brain.
He wouldn't know creativity if his roommate were Paul McCartney. If he didn't have heaps of other people's money under his mattress, he'd be visible for what he is - the REAL human roach.
The one(s) who created and/or uploaded this video would like the viewer to forget that their "description" of President Obama is the same as what was said about Ronald Reagan during his administration. That's what the "Trickle Down Theory of Economics" amounted to, the promise that people would get money without having to work. That anybody could saddle Mr. Obama with this same position is ludicrous. I suppose almost half the US population is ludicrous (with emphasis on the last two letters).
@coldbeer1984 And, how is it being abused? In saying that all Mr. Obama does is give handouts, the creator of this video (as well as the uploader) can disregard the jobs he has created, the moves he's made to counteract the economic collapse which did begin during the Bush Administration (and has gotten worse thanks to the REPUBLICANS) and resolved to end both wars. Piggybacking ignorance and hate off the Bill of Rights is ABUSE!
@coldbeer1984 I do know the purpose of that amendment. And, I still assert that whoever created this video is ABUSING that amendment, just like every neo-conservative who spreads false propaganda over the net. Yes, Bush was a puppet for Cheney, but he was nothing like Obama. Neither was McCain. Obama is ruining nothing. You're doing worse than him.
You are only saying he doesn't care about XYZ to divide them. That tactic is backfiring, and your people are falling victim to it first.
@CircleCityEric You Democrats should move to Cuba if you hate free speech that much. Your buddy Castro hates anyone who criticizes him. You fascist Democrats could also move to Iran since you hate Jews and Christians.
@dc97rocks It ABUSES the 1st Amendment, and it's insulting. If whoever made that video were a high school student, he or she would either get expelled for slander or grounded for a month. It's easy to punish a kid, but what if you're a legal adult and still behaving like a kid - the way the maker of this clip is? It hasn't changed since Bush was in office and these cartoons were painting him as a patron saint - who killed thousands.
@imatool2 Excuse me, but who's going to get a job if he or she has to go to China to get it? And, give me a real answer. And, Obama has created jobs. The stimulus package almost single-handedly repaved all the streets in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. That took work, work which didn't take place during the Bush Administration. Use your heads a bit, o blind ones!
@OTsuperduper No, that's your position. I have actually listened to the Republican/Conservative side ever since 1999. Can you honestly say that you've listened to Democratic/Liberal side - aside from claptrap like this - for anywhere near that long? Do you even know how to listen? I sure do.
@OTsuperduper That is one of the major laws of liberalism, I shall respect anything you have to say as long as you agree with me. Anyone who disagrees with me, please show me a great example
@BadgerCat10 That's the problem with conservatism. There are no examples, no facts, no honesty, just vindictive, spiteful distortions. Conservatism wouldn't know what real respect was if real respect shook its hand. And, it wasn't a liberal who disrespectfully stormed out of budget talks when he couldn't get his way; it was a conservative - named Eric Cantor.
This liberal wants the two sides to straighten up and fly right - together. Question is, when will they?
@CircleCityEric How presumptuous of you, im a libertarian, the dislike i have of liberalism is coincidental to conservatives. I wont deny that conservatives try to take away liberties, but my dislike of liberalism is completely philosophy based, not biased dislike. On most issues i see, it is liberals that either make laws to protect people from themselves, as well as laws that give minority groups elevated rights, which is most insulting, and anyone who disagrees is made a racist
@BadgerCat10 I for one can't see how anybody's dislike of liberals can be philosophical. All the conservatives I've dealt with have voiced the same opinions as each other, almost completely without variation. And, most of them show no recognition for what Democrats in general have achieved. I'm not saying that as a personal attack, rather an expression of what I've been witness to since I became a voter. I've just observed that there's no room in conservatism for philosophical reflection.
@CircleCityEric Neither parties are based on a single philosophy, but i find that liberalism is largely based on guilt. For instance, California passing a law that school MUST teach about gays in history, which says "Your contribution to history is solely based on your sexuality, not your character." Guilt at homophobia means they get special treatment
But these generalizations happen because it is easy to generalize when it comes to alternative view points or groups, we are all guilty of it.
@BadgerCat10 Excuse me, but no liberal I know of would forcibly apply guilt. And, they wouldn't dare say"Your contribution to history is solely based on your sexuality, not your character." That's a Conservative standpoint. For liberals, it's strictly about truth. Any guilt you may be emphasizing likely comes from the sudden realization that conservatives may have been wrong all along.
@CircleCityEric Why else would Liberals mandate that sexual preference be unnaturally imposed upon history? If someone invents something or does some act that has nothing to do with sexual preference, what other than guilt or pandering would compel us to introduce their sexual preference into the story?
@BadgerCat10 I'm (partly) sorry, but guilt has nothing to do with it. That's your contrivance. If conservatives have any reason to feel guilty, it's because they've spent a hundred and fifty years telling the world that homosexuality is a sin, which it isn't. It's now included in history lessons, because way too many conservatives are intolerant. Tolerance is one of the many things which real educators are now trying to include in their curriculum. Your guilt is your own.
@BadgerCat10 Excuse me, but that's exactly what conservatism has done - once more - for one hundred fifty years, imposed sexual preference on a story that has nothing to do with sexual preference. You've said that heterosexuality is the only way to live, that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and traanssexuals/transgenders are blatant sinners to either be"cured" or condemned. It's hateful, hypocritical and right in front of your face. Liberals seek to cancel it out, not prolong it.
@CircleCityEric Really -->I've<-- said "heterosexuality is the only way to live, that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and traanssexuals/transgenders are blatant sinners to either be"cured" or condemned." Dude, go back, review my posts, and show me where I've ever made ANY judgmental about gays. You simply must be confusing me with someone else. My point is about the law, not about gays. Once you've convinced yourself that I'm not the homophobe that you are confusing me with, please answer my question.
@BadgerCat10 It may not be too difficult to "confuse ]you] with someone else." Your words betray everything about you. You wouldn't have such a problem with "the law," if you didn't have a problem with that curriculum. It's no dumber (in fact less) than most of the pointless stuff you learn in biology or earth science, stuff about human anatomy or the physical world which isn't going to aide 90% of Americans but is still required. Teaching about sexual tolerance will do nobody harm.
@CircleCityEric Methinks that your bigotry against conservatives colors your thinking. I already told you that I'm a libertarian yet you insist on falsely qualifying me as a conservative. LIkewise, the talented playwright Edward Albee dislikes being qualified by the phrase "gay playwright," as he does not write as a gay. Gays have misinterpreted his take, much as you have misinterpreted mine. It's purely about relevance of sexual preference in the context of a historical act.
@BadgerCat10 My sincere apologies, but what you call "prejudice" is brought on yourselves. You're using it inappropriately in this context and purely as a defense mechanism. And even if Mr. Albee didn't want to be thought of as a "gay playwright," I doubt that stopped any bigot from wantonly insulting him for his sexuality. Face it, whoever you are, I've misinterpreted nothing. Especially since conservatives are so blind to history to begin with, this isn't hurting you. You're out of line!
@CircleCityEric Your whole take is based on your presumption of homophobia on your part. Do you even know the difference between a Libertarian and a Conservative? Oddly enough, there are two main points that separate them (though a lot of the views they share are coincidental), can you guess what those two main points are?
@BadgerCat10 Frankly, I don't care one way or the other. You can share them if you want, bu tit isn't worth my brainpower to even venture that guess. As far as I'm concerned, two differences isn't enough to make me change my mind.
@CircleCityEric If you dont care, why are you even online. What you have literally just said is that you dont care what someone thinks, you just want to argue.
BTW, Libertarians differ from conservatives in that they don't have a Christian agenda, and that they ARENT homophobic, because they are for SOCIAL and economic liberty. Since, liberty is our primary concern, we are for things like porn, prostitution, drugs, and "frankly" aren't homophobic. Not very conservative. Do some research
@BadgerCat10 As I just found out, a true libertarian simply doesn't want the government to dictate what people do in their private lives. From where I sit, that's not nearly enough to take issue over school curriculum, which - based on your own description is meant only to teach tolerance.
The reason I wasn't going to "research" the differences was that I'd spent a good part of today trying to have a "debate" with somebody who's been anything BUT reasonable, and I don't take their ques.
@CircleCityEric The reason I am against it is that it is mandatory. Tolerance is not learned in school (dont get me started on schools) tolerance is learned from influences in childrens lives. Its more beneficial to have tolerance observed from good influences rather than force fed by teachers. In the end, the best thing you can do is let people learn for themselves who to like and dislike. Yes, it is wrong to hate people for being gay, but JUST as wrong to accept them ONLY because they are gay
@BadgerCat10 I say you're exaggerating. You may have some valid points, but I think you're presenting them in the wrong forum and not in the most positive light.
@CircleCityEric And you need to watch out for my first point that i made. As soon as I said that I dont like how schools try to tell people that gay people are "special" and you immediately jump to the conclusion that i must be homophobic. This is, oddly enough, that EXACT phenomenon that I was referring to. "If you disagree with me, you must be sexist, racist, homophobic, or any other hater." You should spend more time understanding what someone is saying rather than defining who they are
@BadgerCat10 If that's what you were aiming for, you failed miserably. You were trying to ask a reasonable question in the context of delivering an attack. Like a Lindor truffle wrapped in porcupine quills.
@CircleCityEric If you would please give a direct example from ANY of my comments, where it would be easy to assume that i was being homophobic and was attacking gays, i will be most happy to admit i was in the wrong.
You can just copy and paste ANYTHING I have said right out of my comments, and explain how it seemed to be homophobic. I'll let you chose whether or not you provide it in context. Either way, provide me with a example, and i shall happily admit my mistake
@BadgerCat10 I take issue with: "On most issues i see, it is liberals that either make laws to protect people from themselves, as well as laws that give minority groups elevated rights, which is most insulting." The ones attempting to pass laws that "protect people from themselves " are the Tea Party members, many of whom claim to be "libertarians." The whole notion to demolish healthcare reform is a prime example. And last time I checked, Affirmative Action hasn't hurt you in any way.
@BadgerCat10 And, neither will becoming educated on sexual orientation, what it really means and how ignorance of it has tarnished the western world for a century-and-a-half.
@CircleCityEric I asked for a SPECIFIC quote that shows i was being homophobic, please provide the specific sentence that would justify the assumption that I am homophobic.
How is the quote that you provided wrong? I said "elevated rights," do you think that minorities should have more rights than white people, because I always thought that everyone should be equal under the law, and that race, gender, and orientation shouldn't even be considered. Why did you have to jump to me being bigoted?
@BadgerCat10 Look, you were the one who specifically mentioned this newly-implemented sex education in California. I didn't start this "debate;" you did. It was the mentioning of a curriculum which deals with sexual preferences which (no matter how inaccurately) painted you as homophobic. I'm sure most people in California won't consider themselves "forced to learn about it."
@CircleCityEric Haha, I have a problem when schools value what people are more than who people are, and that makes me a homophobe. You can't even post anything that labels me as a homophobe because you jumped to that wild conclusion. Liberal tactic; call them a bigot when you can't logically argue anything, please PLEASE tell me how im wrong and how you didn't call me a bigot.
Like Dumbledore says, it doesnt matter what someone is born, but what they grow to be.
@BadgerCat10 He also wouldn't have taken issue with this sort of curriculum, and you're not doing a good job of disassociating yourself from conservatives. They beat the same subject into the ground incessantly and can't respect others' desire to drop it. So, I'm now asking you if you will - please drop it?
I think I did a fine job of displaying your mistake, but you're too ignorant to accept it.
@CircleCityEric Haha, i knew you couldn't do it. EVERY single liberal that i have ever debated with has called me a racist, sexist, bigot, or whatever, and when i simply ask for a specific sentence, they ALLLL say "uhh...if you cant see my point, youre stupid"
Ad hominem attacks are a sign of weakness, any debater will tell you that, you have made a lot of "YOU" insults at me, have I made one directed at you? They all also say that when your opponent is reduced to ad hominem you have won, yaa!
@BadgerCat10 I'm simply going to say that I feel sorry for you that you can say things like that, not knowing that you've nevertheless aligned yourself with people who are far more guilty of "ad hominem" attacks than I've ever been. And, you've also inherited their trait for twisting things around. I'd show you an example, but you'd just ignore it. So typical.
@BadgerCat10 You've won nothing. You claimed to disassociate from conservatives, but you've linked with them strictly on the premise of wanting to override liberals. That kind of means-to-an-end scenario always comes back to get you when you realize you've been linked with the wrong people - against the wrong people.
@CircleCityEric You made ad hominem attacks at me, which you claim conservatives do. If you resent conservatives so much, why do you emulate their behavior then?
Why do you generalize the behavior of any group of people from a few morons on youtube?
@BadgerCat10 Right now, if anbody's attacking anybody else or making generalizations, it isn't me. The one who hasn't proven that he has the whole nation's best interest at heart isn't me. The one who's stood up to be counted with the enemy of everything this country was founded upon isn't me. I won't say who it is - - but it isn't me.
Go bitch to your mesiah ya pussy ass liberal..the world is starting to figure out that this mongloid in the white house was full of shit from the start and you and every other liberal are shitting your pants...
@MajorKoenig2 No, we're not. We're all relieved to know that the G O Pestilence you helped to elect have finally begun to grow up a little. Don't you know they almost cost your ass money? Oh yeah, it was their refusal to be flexible which almost shut the government down. After what happened twelve years ago, you shouldn't be using words like "mongoloid." You should be begging his forgiveness and thanking him for sparing your sorry butt!
@StoogeWatcher You think Democrats hate free speech? What you call "free speech" in reality looks more like assuming a squat position with your hands over your head and your naked rear end sticking out at everyone. We're supposed to accept the garbage shooting out of that rear, while your hands over your head prevent you from listening to anything reasonable!
And, in reference to above post, Iran & Cuba are YOUR territories, babe! You wouldn't be factored out there as you'll be here by 2040.
@CircleCityEric You Democrats were all about free speech when it was critical of Bush. Now you advocate censorship and want to prosecute anyone who dares criticize Obama.
You Democrats should move to Iran because you hate Jews and Christians. You're fans of Cuba because you support Communism and censorship.
@StoogeWatcher I take back what I wrote an hour ago about 2040. The date will be 2020 when your "party" disappears from the political equation. By then, if not by next year, the real people of this country will be fed up having their opinions DICTATED to them by a small, pitiful selection of self-important, vindictive bigots like you. And, you'll learn to stop calling them "you Democrats."
@purplehazed54 That's not true. I don't know what books you've been reading, but that's not true!
@StoogeWatcher You must be watching the mirror, since you type like a stooge for the soon-to-be-evicted Glenn Beck. Go stand arm in arm with Fred Phelps and Ted Kaczynski, since you obviously hate America and all the people in it.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; "or abridging the freedom of speech", or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
@purplehazed54 The part where it gives you license to accuse Barack Obama of being the anti-Christ or to brazenly throw childish insults in his direction. If you were yourself a child in school saying these stupid things in front of your class, you'd probably get suspended. The Constitution doesn't give you the right to be a proverbial swastika.
@purplehazed54 It's been said on here that [Democrats] only respect freedom of speech except for people who don't agree with [them]. How hypocritical can [anybody] get? We suffered through eight years of Bush, and six of those years included a Republican Congressional majority. Frankly, I don't remember too many of those people respecting [my] 1st Amendment rights. Anybody who exercised their freedom to disagree with the Bush Push into Iraq was considered suspicious. That works in reverse.
@CircleCityEric Yes, it does work in reverse and this is an example of it. So what's your problem? If it's ok for people who disagree with Bush to dump all over him then it's perfectly alright for people to do the same with Obama. (And don't pretend for a moment that the vitriol directed at Obama is any worse than the stuff that was thrown at Bush.) Unhinged Obama haters are entitled to as much freedom of expression as any unhinged Bush hater that's how it works.
@mkeogh76 Only diference, Obama isn't a genocidal maniac who invaded the lives of non-Americans trying to push values down their throats which they weren't ready for. And, this debt existed before he was elected. He's done all he could to reverse it, and the reason he hasn't is that nobody is cooperating with him. In 2 1/2 years, he's gotten more static than Michael Jackson got in 50 years. And for what? You don't have to like him, but don't lie about him!
@CircleCityEric So it's perfectly ok to piss on Bush because he was "evil" and stuff, but Obama is awesome so it's not right to criticise him? Did it ever occur to you that the stuff you just wrote would strike many people as being ridiculous lies? (Genocidal maniac? Reversing the debt? Michael Jackson?) You're so full of hatred for Bush and adoration of Obama that you can't even recognize your own rank hypocrisy. You're either a hypocrite or an idiot. Either way you can't be taken seriously.
@mkeogh76 But, I will be taken seriously, because the liar is you - along with the maker of this video and the one who uploaded it. You obviously didn't read half of what I just posted, but I've read every syllable you wrote. Bush did commit genocide on the same people he claimed he was trying to liberate. And, the debt skyrocketed during so-called "Iraqi Freedom." Any increase since 2009 has far more to do with Boehner than ever it did Obama. If you'd just consider it, we'll be better off.
@CircleCityEric YOUR AN IDIOT TO MAKE THAT COMMENT, THIS CARTOON SIMPLY SHOWS WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE VOTED FOR THIS STUPID PRESIDENT. VOTE FOR RON PAUL OR HERMAIN CAIN
@CircleCityEric everyone likes the 1st amendment until someone says something they don't like. the cartoon is true the comments were actually made by obama voters if you can find a way to defend obama please let me know. he has lied so many times including lies about taxes, earmarks, transparency, end the war, etc.
@assetoverflow Prove it came from Obama voters, pipsqueak(s)!
I don't need to defend him; his actions speak for themselves. He managed to prevent the Tea Party Terrorists in Congress a) from shutting the government down which would've depleted everybody's purses and b) from defaulting on our loans & debt which AGAIN would've depleted everyone's purses. Face it, little one(s). Obama saved your life. Get it in your head(s).
@assetoverflow Political Correctness is Tyranny and Un-American.."As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy (1802-1837)
@pauliewalnuts1156 If that's the best you can do, you need to get out from under your rock more than once a year. If Obama wipes his ass with the Constitution, Sarah Palin uses it to plug up holes in her distributor shaft, and John Boehner uses it for wallpaper.
As for Libya, ask the NATO members across the ocean. When you wake up and smell the clumsiness, you'd realize that our presence there isn't a hundredth what it was in Iraq under Bush & Cheney. Only a naive fool would blame Obama.
you launch into Bush sucks, foreign policy rant, but this video is not about thant.. pls comment on the real people that thought they were getting Free "Obama Money" because they voted for him .. Hmm
@pauliewalnuts1156 That's not why they voted for him. They voted for him for the same reason anybody (supposedly) votes for a President. Because, they trusted him to delegate over the needs of every American citizen. If the material in this offensive video were published in a newspaper in the 1890's, it'd be criticized as "yellow journalism."
Despite their anti-Obama "unity," all the parties this video benefits are otherwise divided. This is an attempt to similarly divide the Dems. FAILED!
@pauliewalnuts1156 Obviously, you can't think of anything else, and it's not even true. Get real. You're expecting the same stupid thing from the Republicans, aren't you? Isn't that what you wanted from Reagan? Trickle-down money?
I AM TIRED OF YOU RACISTS...TIRED, TIRED OF ALL YOU HATERS. OBAMA IS THE GREATEST. OBAMA BROUGHT CHANGE, WHY CANT U IDIOT REDNECKS SEE THIS?? HE IS HOPE. DO U HATE HOPE???? nah jk, he sucks. good vid
Obama got the money from the bank he works for called the federal reserve, a private predatory lending corp. that has a army of tax /interest collectors we call the IRS. We as a country will never get out of debt between illegal Latin immigrants sending the u.s. dollars back home to Guadalajara and the Federal Reserve destroying it. I love America!!!
pauliewalnuts1156: How can you say get back to the Constitution?? Are you nuts??!! Obama has this all under control he is "The Great One" after all! These stupid people in this video make this college student sick. You are spending MY MONEY you morons! Wake up and get your ass in gear and start working. Not going and waiting in line for Obama Money! Hurry up November!
@TheWake247: OK GENIUS......and when YOU find YOUR "take home earnings" equal 1 or 2 days of your 5 to 6 day work week AFTER the taxes (that don't mean much to you NOW) have been taken (BEFORE you receieve YOUR pay) leaving you unable to support YOUR family, YOUR degree won't mean much......and (unless your dumber than your comment suggests) I wager YOUR ASS will be climbing on the "Social Services Train" before NOBODY can pay these taxes ((look up the "Calderone" government wise guy).
@Harpenfarker "Wise Guy", We can always print more money. Who really cares about inflation anyway! I don't think you caught my sarcasm in the last comment but it's ok! LOL Please get out and vote these Progressives out of Office in November! Stop the theives in Washington from stealing more of my generations money as well as MY MONEY!
This is funny, but also sad. Your average Nignog has no concept of how government funding works. They literally do not understand that "government" money comes from people who work and pay taxes.
@mikerolf1: What I find truley frightening is the fact that between 50 & 55% of America's electorate is registered Democrat who exibit a tendancy to VOTE democrat regardless of candidate character (save previous transgression record") and they fail to realize/understand that with only 20% of the American society validating they are "liberal" (progressivs?, socialists?, communists?) they further fail to see these "liberal" (progressivs?, socialists?, communists?) now define their party platform!
Buncha Drones
pauliewalnuts1156 2 months ago
@156sbr Are you still refusing to grow up?
CircleCityEric 6 months ago
@156sbr Let [Nellie Oleson] rave on that men will know [her] mad.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@156sbr My name is not "roach;" it's Eric. You give me the kind of respect you'd damn well want for yourself, no matter what your (undeserved) opinion of me is, and you'll get it back from me. You forget, Nellie Oleson that you can't buy respect.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
Obamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
pauliewalnuts1156 7 months ago
@156sbr No, just going to get more of it. Ask the Gang of Six - NELLIE!
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@156sbr Or from Nellie Oleson.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, how do you convince the private sector to hire? That's the key. People talk about downsizing the government and reducing federal jobs. What they don't think about is that, if those same people can't get private jobs and are forced onto unemployment, the government will lose money anyway. How do you get the private sector to hire those people without forcing them to by law? That's a serious conundrum that nobody's found an answer to.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr As if any of you are tolerant or accepting. Underneath your all-American posturing, you're no different than Hitler.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr And, you wouldn't know if I did get a job other than music, because you're Nellie Oleson!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr You're barking up a dead tree, Nellie. If you don't shut up, you'll lose everything.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr (cont.)
push for fierce literalism under forged Constitution clauses;
and FINALLY: overemphasize the power of the state.
And what for? All in the name of making yourself look like a human being - WHICH YOU CLEARLY ARENOT?!?!?!?!
If anything, I'm not going to get out of your wallet. I'm going to take it all, because it isn't yours!!!!!!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Oh yeah, as if they'd give kudos to a bully like you instead. I know enough about the Bill of Rights to know:
you've abuse the 1st Amendment with your boyish insults and riotous posture;
like to shoot everybody who isn't you;
forge warrants to arrest everyone like me;
break-&-enter without permission to continue above;
ignore the 5th Amendment, because you'd rather lie under oath;
push a judge off a cliff to prevent my case going to court;
ignore civil common law;
up the bail numbers;
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Obviously, you've ONLY heard of the Constitution. You use it as a fly swatter, but have you even opened it?
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Not an expert. An exploit, you bleach-blonde ditz with a peppermint stick in your rotten teeth!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr "Bogus Obama document bigger than Watergate" That's yellow-bellied yellow journalism at its worst.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Oh, I'm "worthless, no shame filthy beggar"? I'm not the one going in circles - NELLIE OLESON! Go get 1,50cc of Thorazine! Bound to knock you flat on your back where you belong!
Get this through your concussed skull, blondie: I'M NOT LISTENING TO YOU! GIVE IT UP!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Leave it alone! It's a dead issue, almost like 156sbr! Only a crybaby would refuse to let something as trivial and pointless as this issue fester. You're only making yourself look like the fool you know you are!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr Everything's a non-=answer, if it's not what "Nellie Oleson" wants to read. You'd call it a "non-answer" even if it was coming from Warren Buffet, so your opinion is meaningless.
Come up to New York. Meet me. Prove to me that you're every bit as good as Eric Clapton or Terry Kath from Chicago. Then, I may listen to your ignorant psychobabble. Until then, SHUT UP!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr As if that's not what you do. I told you, you're just a well-paid version of me. You man-up. You're the one making a dishonest living, here.
Go comb your blonde curls, Nellie Oleson! And, don't forget to tell your sniveling mother hello!
I'm worth a hundred of you. You haven't got a speck of talent in that black hole you call a body.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr I DID NOT SAY THAT! YOU DID! AND, IT NOT THE TRUTH AT ALL!
I made sure to write that in words you could understand - with print you'd be likely to read, since you're so convinced I'm not legally blind - implying you've got worse vision than I am.
Who needs to grow up - NELLIE OLESON?
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
It's time to give 156sbr a new comparative name. How about - NELLIE OLESON????????
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr That quote of Roosevelt's was directed at you, not me. You may have worn the uniform, but you're the one whose never known victory nor defeat. I've known both, and I'm proud. Proud that I've succeeded at becoming a musician (who HAS earned his way in the world) and proud that I've survived having failed at many things. One is to talk people like you away from the ledge.
You're not celebrating any victories, because you're reaching out to no-one. But, it's not too late.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
Looks like a bunch of pompous, self-satisfied running-off-at-the-mouth posturing to me.
"Honesty is such a lonely word."
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@156sbr You're beyond hope. Anybody who pays for you to stuff your face must be kicking themselves.
You're a well-paid version of ME!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
Comment removed
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr And, you're exploding like a sun going nova. Go jump in the Colorado River before you incinerate the entire western world. And, take your pretzel maker with you, so we're through with your twisted banter.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
Mr. 1r56sbr would like to destroy everything and everybody in society, kind of like the creators & promoters of this garbage video. He's self-loathing, and he thinks everybody should feel the same way - kind of like Rush Limbaugh. What does he have to give to the world? Nothing but lies.
Obama is medicine. He's the kind of medicine that people usually hate to swallow because of its bitter taste. When they're cured, they pretend they always loved it. Nasty medicine, cold shower and veggies!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr
You make your money from telling lies. I never said that I never worked. That's your pathetic ball of yarn.
Don't tell lies, Lucy!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@156sbr I never said that. I said that I work as a musician. But, 666S-son-of-a-B-R has made a career out of yellow(-bellied) journalism. He's the shameless one, not that anybody could ever tell him. The Arizona desert has fried his brain.
He wouldn't know creativity if his roommate were Paul McCartney. If he didn't have heaps of other people's money under his mattress, he'd be visible for what he is - the REAL human roach.
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
The one(s) who created and/or uploaded this video would like the viewer to forget that their "description" of President Obama is the same as what was said about Ronald Reagan during his administration. That's what the "Trickle Down Theory of Economics" amounted to, the promise that people would get money without having to work. That anybody could saddle Mr. Obama with this same position is ludicrous. I suppose almost half the US population is ludicrous (with emphasis on the last two letters).
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
That was spot on!
purplehazed54 10 months ago
@coldbeer1984 And, how is it being abused? In saying that all Mr. Obama does is give handouts, the creator of this video (as well as the uploader) can disregard the jobs he has created, the moves he's made to counteract the economic collapse which did begin during the Bush Administration (and has gotten worse thanks to the REPUBLICANS) and resolved to end both wars. Piggybacking ignorance and hate off the Bill of Rights is ABUSE!
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@coldbeer1984 I do know the purpose of that amendment. And, I still assert that whoever created this video is ABUSING that amendment, just like every neo-conservative who spreads false propaganda over the net. Yes, Bush was a puppet for Cheney, but he was nothing like Obama. Neither was McCain. Obama is ruining nothing. You're doing worse than him.
You are only saying he doesn't care about XYZ to divide them. That tactic is backfiring, and your people are falling victim to it first.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@CircleCityEric You Democrats should move to Cuba if you hate free speech that much. Your buddy Castro hates anyone who criticizes him. You fascist Democrats could also move to Iran since you hate Jews and Christians.
StoogeWatcher 10 months ago
watch?v=sZ9hVMN8UMY&feature=player_embedded
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@dc97rocks It ABUSES the 1st Amendment, and it's insulting. If whoever made that video were a high school student, he or she would either get expelled for slander or grounded for a month. It's easy to punish a kid, but what if you're a legal adult and still behaving like a kid - the way the maker of this clip is? It hasn't changed since Bush was in office and these cartoons were painting him as a patron saint - who killed thousands.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
Ignorance is bliss.... They don't HAVE to get jobs when their savior, Obama, prints money whenever they need it.
imatool2 11 months ago
@imatool2 Excuse me, but who's going to get a job if he or she has to go to China to get it? And, give me a real answer. And, Obama has created jobs. The stimulus package almost single-handedly repaved all the streets in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. That took work, work which didn't take place during the Bush Administration. Use your heads a bit, o blind ones!
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
When the government doesn't help anybody, people get angry..
When the government helps people, they cry "Socialism!"
public opinion FAIL
TheTraumarama 1 year ago
Like Reagan voters were any better -__-
FloydIV 1 year ago
I'm sure I'm not the first one to say this. Whoever created this pathetic cartoon is abusing the 1st Amendment and the voters.
CircleCityEric 1 year ago
Ah, I see. You are for freedom of speech except for people who don't agree with you.
OTsuperduper 1 year ago
@OTsuperduper No, that's your position. I have actually listened to the Republican/Conservative side ever since 1999. Can you honestly say that you've listened to Democratic/Liberal side - aside from claptrap like this - for anywhere near that long? Do you even know how to listen? I sure do.
CircleCityEric 1 year ago
@OTsuperduper That is one of the major laws of liberalism, I shall respect anything you have to say as long as you agree with me. Anyone who disagrees with me, please show me a great example
BadgerCat10 8 months ago
@BadgerCat10 That's the problem with conservatism. There are no examples, no facts, no honesty, just vindictive, spiteful distortions. Conservatism wouldn't know what real respect was if real respect shook its hand. And, it wasn't a liberal who disrespectfully stormed out of budget talks when he couldn't get his way; it was a conservative - named Eric Cantor.
This liberal wants the two sides to straighten up and fly right - together. Question is, when will they?
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric How presumptuous of you, im a libertarian, the dislike i have of liberalism is coincidental to conservatives. I wont deny that conservatives try to take away liberties, but my dislike of liberalism is completely philosophy based, not biased dislike. On most issues i see, it is liberals that either make laws to protect people from themselves, as well as laws that give minority groups elevated rights, which is most insulting, and anyone who disagrees is made a racist
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 I for one can't see how anybody's dislike of liberals can be philosophical. All the conservatives I've dealt with have voiced the same opinions as each other, almost completely without variation. And, most of them show no recognition for what Democrats in general have achieved. I'm not saying that as a personal attack, rather an expression of what I've been witness to since I became a voter. I've just observed that there's no room in conservatism for philosophical reflection.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Neither parties are based on a single philosophy, but i find that liberalism is largely based on guilt. For instance, California passing a law that school MUST teach about gays in history, which says "Your contribution to history is solely based on your sexuality, not your character." Guilt at homophobia means they get special treatment
But these generalizations happen because it is easy to generalize when it comes to alternative view points or groups, we are all guilty of it.
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 Excuse me, but no liberal I know of would forcibly apply guilt. And, they wouldn't dare say"Your contribution to history is solely based on your sexuality, not your character." That's a Conservative standpoint. For liberals, it's strictly about truth. Any guilt you may be emphasizing likely comes from the sudden realization that conservatives may have been wrong all along.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Why else would Liberals mandate that sexual preference be unnaturally imposed upon history? If someone invents something or does some act that has nothing to do with sexual preference, what other than guilt or pandering would compel us to introduce their sexual preference into the story?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 I'm (partly) sorry, but guilt has nothing to do with it. That's your contrivance. If conservatives have any reason to feel guilty, it's because they've spent a hundred and fifty years telling the world that homosexuality is a sin, which it isn't. It's now included in history lessons, because way too many conservatives are intolerant. Tolerance is one of the many things which real educators are now trying to include in their curriculum. Your guilt is your own.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Tell me why we would impose sexual preference on a story that has nothing to do with sexual preference?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 Excuse me, but that's exactly what conservatism has done - once more - for one hundred fifty years, imposed sexual preference on a story that has nothing to do with sexual preference. You've said that heterosexuality is the only way to live, that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and traanssexuals/transgenders are blatant sinners to either be"cured" or condemned. It's hateful, hypocritical and right in front of your face. Liberals seek to cancel it out, not prolong it.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Really -->I've<-- said "heterosexuality is the only way to live, that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and traanssexuals/transgenders are blatant sinners to either be"cured" or condemned." Dude, go back, review my posts, and show me where I've ever made ANY judgmental about gays. You simply must be confusing me with someone else. My point is about the law, not about gays. Once you've convinced yourself that I'm not the homophobe that you are confusing me with, please answer my question.
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 It may not be too difficult to "confuse ]you] with someone else." Your words betray everything about you. You wouldn't have such a problem with "the law," if you didn't have a problem with that curriculum. It's no dumber (in fact less) than most of the pointless stuff you learn in biology or earth science, stuff about human anatomy or the physical world which isn't going to aide 90% of Americans but is still required. Teaching about sexual tolerance will do nobody harm.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Methinks that your bigotry against conservatives colors your thinking. I already told you that I'm a libertarian yet you insist on falsely qualifying me as a conservative. LIkewise, the talented playwright Edward Albee dislikes being qualified by the phrase "gay playwright," as he does not write as a gay. Gays have misinterpreted his take, much as you have misinterpreted mine. It's purely about relevance of sexual preference in the context of a historical act.
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 My sincere apologies, but what you call "prejudice" is brought on yourselves. You're using it inappropriately in this context and purely as a defense mechanism. And even if Mr. Albee didn't want to be thought of as a "gay playwright," I doubt that stopped any bigot from wantonly insulting him for his sexuality. Face it, whoever you are, I've misinterpreted nothing. Especially since conservatives are so blind to history to begin with, this isn't hurting you. You're out of line!
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Your whole take is based on your presumption of homophobia on your part. Do you even know the difference between a Libertarian and a Conservative? Oddly enough, there are two main points that separate them (though a lot of the views they share are coincidental), can you guess what those two main points are?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 Frankly, I don't care one way or the other. You can share them if you want, bu tit isn't worth my brainpower to even venture that guess. As far as I'm concerned, two differences isn't enough to make me change my mind.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric If you dont care, why are you even online. What you have literally just said is that you dont care what someone thinks, you just want to argue.
BTW, Libertarians differ from conservatives in that they don't have a Christian agenda, and that they ARENT homophobic, because they are for SOCIAL and economic liberty. Since, liberty is our primary concern, we are for things like porn, prostitution, drugs, and "frankly" aren't homophobic. Not very conservative. Do some research
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 As I just found out, a true libertarian simply doesn't want the government to dictate what people do in their private lives. From where I sit, that's not nearly enough to take issue over school curriculum, which - based on your own description is meant only to teach tolerance.
The reason I wasn't going to "research" the differences was that I'd spent a good part of today trying to have a "debate" with somebody who's been anything BUT reasonable, and I don't take their ques.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric The reason I am against it is that it is mandatory. Tolerance is not learned in school (dont get me started on schools) tolerance is learned from influences in childrens lives. Its more beneficial to have tolerance observed from good influences rather than force fed by teachers. In the end, the best thing you can do is let people learn for themselves who to like and dislike. Yes, it is wrong to hate people for being gay, but JUST as wrong to accept them ONLY because they are gay
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 I say you're exaggerating. You may have some valid points, but I think you're presenting them in the wrong forum and not in the most positive light.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric And you need to watch out for my first point that i made. As soon as I said that I dont like how schools try to tell people that gay people are "special" and you immediately jump to the conclusion that i must be homophobic. This is, oddly enough, that EXACT phenomenon that I was referring to. "If you disagree with me, you must be sexist, racist, homophobic, or any other hater." You should spend more time understanding what someone is saying rather than defining who they are
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 If that's what you were aiming for, you failed miserably. You were trying to ask a reasonable question in the context of delivering an attack. Like a Lindor truffle wrapped in porcupine quills.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric If you would please give a direct example from ANY of my comments, where it would be easy to assume that i was being homophobic and was attacking gays, i will be most happy to admit i was in the wrong.
You can just copy and paste ANYTHING I have said right out of my comments, and explain how it seemed to be homophobic. I'll let you chose whether or not you provide it in context. Either way, provide me with a example, and i shall happily admit my mistake
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 I take issue with: "On most issues i see, it is liberals that either make laws to protect people from themselves, as well as laws that give minority groups elevated rights, which is most insulting." The ones attempting to pass laws that "protect people from themselves " are the Tea Party members, many of whom claim to be "libertarians." The whole notion to demolish healthcare reform is a prime example. And last time I checked, Affirmative Action hasn't hurt you in any way.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 And, neither will becoming educated on sexual orientation, what it really means and how ignorance of it has tarnished the western world for a century-and-a-half.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric I asked for a SPECIFIC quote that shows i was being homophobic, please provide the specific sentence that would justify the assumption that I am homophobic.
How is the quote that you provided wrong? I said "elevated rights," do you think that minorities should have more rights than white people, because I always thought that everyone should be equal under the law, and that race, gender, and orientation shouldn't even be considered. Why did you have to jump to me being bigoted?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 Look, you were the one who specifically mentioned this newly-implemented sex education in California. I didn't start this "debate;" you did. It was the mentioning of a curriculum which deals with sexual preferences which (no matter how inaccurately) painted you as homophobic. I'm sure most people in California won't consider themselves "forced to learn about it."
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Haha, I have a problem when schools value what people are more than who people are, and that makes me a homophobe. You can't even post anything that labels me as a homophobe because you jumped to that wild conclusion. Liberal tactic; call them a bigot when you can't logically argue anything, please PLEASE tell me how im wrong and how you didn't call me a bigot.
Like Dumbledore says, it doesnt matter what someone is born, but what they grow to be.
BTW, i believe YOU this, haha
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 He also wouldn't have taken issue with this sort of curriculum, and you're not doing a good job of disassociating yourself from conservatives. They beat the same subject into the ground incessantly and can't respect others' desire to drop it. So, I'm now asking you if you will - please drop it?
I think I did a fine job of displaying your mistake, but you're too ignorant to accept it.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric Haha, i knew you couldn't do it. EVERY single liberal that i have ever debated with has called me a racist, sexist, bigot, or whatever, and when i simply ask for a specific sentence, they ALLLL say "uhh...if you cant see my point, youre stupid"
Ad hominem attacks are a sign of weakness, any debater will tell you that, you have made a lot of "YOU" insults at me, have I made one directed at you? They all also say that when your opponent is reduced to ad hominem you have won, yaa!
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 I'm simply going to say that I feel sorry for you that you can say things like that, not knowing that you've nevertheless aligned yourself with people who are far more guilty of "ad hominem" attacks than I've ever been. And, you've also inherited their trait for twisting things around. I'd show you an example, but you'd just ignore it. So typical.
Can we let this go now?
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric As long as I win thats what matters, right?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 You've won nothing. You claimed to disassociate from conservatives, but you've linked with them strictly on the premise of wanting to override liberals. That kind of means-to-an-end scenario always comes back to get you when you realize you've been linked with the wrong people - against the wrong people.
You've won nothing.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric You made ad hominem attacks at me, which you claim conservatives do. If you resent conservatives so much, why do you emulate their behavior then?
Why do you generalize the behavior of any group of people from a few morons on youtube?
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@BadgerCat10 Right now, if anbody's attacking anybody else or making generalizations, it isn't me. The one who hasn't proven that he has the whole nation's best interest at heart isn't me. The one who's stood up to be counted with the enemy of everything this country was founded upon isn't me. I won't say who it is - - but it isn't me.
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CircleCityEric I will not have you talk about justin timberlake that way
BadgerCat10 7 months ago
@CircleCityEric
Go bitch to your mesiah ya pussy ass liberal..the world is starting to figure out that this mongloid in the white house was full of shit from the start and you and every other liberal are shitting your pants...
MajorKoenig2 11 months ago
@MajorKoenig2 No, we're not. We're all relieved to know that the G O Pestilence you helped to elect have finally begun to grow up a little. Don't you know they almost cost your ass money? Oh yeah, it was their refusal to be flexible which almost shut the government down. After what happened twelve years ago, you shouldn't be using words like "mongoloid." You should be begging his forgiveness and thanking him for sparing your sorry butt!
CircleCityEric 11 months ago
@CircleCityEric No surprise that Democrats hate free speech. You're the same people who advocated the murder of the Danish cartoonists.
StoogeWatcher 10 months ago
@StoogeWatcher You think Democrats hate free speech? What you call "free speech" in reality looks more like assuming a squat position with your hands over your head and your naked rear end sticking out at everyone. We're supposed to accept the garbage shooting out of that rear, while your hands over your head prevent you from listening to anything reasonable!
And, in reference to above post, Iran & Cuba are YOUR territories, babe! You wouldn't be factored out there as you'll be here by 2040.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@CircleCityEric You Democrats were all about free speech when it was critical of Bush. Now you advocate censorship and want to prosecute anyone who dares criticize Obama.
You Democrats should move to Iran because you hate Jews and Christians. You're fans of Cuba because you support Communism and censorship.
StoogeWatcher 10 months ago
@StoogeWatcher I take back what I wrote an hour ago about 2040. The date will be 2020 when your "party" disappears from the political equation. By then, if not by next year, the real people of this country will be fed up having their opinions DICTATED to them by a small, pitiful selection of self-important, vindictive bigots like you. And, you'll learn to stop calling them "you Democrats."
watch?v=oRThr6XD_Io
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@CircleCityEric
The only way to abuse the 1st Amendment is to deny it.
purplehazed54 10 months ago
@purplehazed54 That's not true. I don't know what books you've been reading, but that's not true!
@StoogeWatcher You must be watching the mirror, since you type like a stooge for the soon-to-be-evicted Glenn Beck. Go stand arm in arm with Fred Phelps and Ted Kaczynski, since you obviously hate America and all the people in it.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@CircleCityEric
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; "or abridging the freedom of speech", or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
What part of that do you not understand moron?
purplehazed54 10 months ago
@purplehazed54 The part where it gives you license to accuse Barack Obama of being the anti-Christ or to brazenly throw childish insults in his direction. If you were yourself a child in school saying these stupid things in front of your class, you'd probably get suspended. The Constitution doesn't give you the right to be a proverbial swastika.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@purplehazed54 It's been said on here that [Democrats] only respect freedom of speech except for people who don't agree with [them]. How hypocritical can [anybody] get? We suffered through eight years of Bush, and six of those years included a Republican Congressional majority. Frankly, I don't remember too many of those people respecting [my] 1st Amendment rights. Anybody who exercised their freedom to disagree with the Bush Push into Iraq was considered suspicious. That works in reverse.
CircleCityEric 10 months ago
@CircleCityEric Yes, it does work in reverse and this is an example of it. So what's your problem? If it's ok for people who disagree with Bush to dump all over him then it's perfectly alright for people to do the same with Obama. (And don't pretend for a moment that the vitriol directed at Obama is any worse than the stuff that was thrown at Bush.) Unhinged Obama haters are entitled to as much freedom of expression as any unhinged Bush hater that's how it works.
mkeogh76 9 months ago
@mkeogh76 Only diference, Obama isn't a genocidal maniac who invaded the lives of non-Americans trying to push values down their throats which they weren't ready for. And, this debt existed before he was elected. He's done all he could to reverse it, and the reason he hasn't is that nobody is cooperating with him. In 2 1/2 years, he's gotten more static than Michael Jackson got in 50 years. And for what? You don't have to like him, but don't lie about him!
CircleCityEric 9 months ago
@CircleCityEric So it's perfectly ok to piss on Bush because he was "evil" and stuff, but Obama is awesome so it's not right to criticise him? Did it ever occur to you that the stuff you just wrote would strike many people as being ridiculous lies? (Genocidal maniac? Reversing the debt? Michael Jackson?) You're so full of hatred for Bush and adoration of Obama that you can't even recognize your own rank hypocrisy. You're either a hypocrite or an idiot. Either way you can't be taken seriously.
mkeogh76 9 months ago
@mkeogh76 But, I will be taken seriously, because the liar is you - along with the maker of this video and the one who uploaded it. You obviously didn't read half of what I just posted, but I've read every syllable you wrote. Bush did commit genocide on the same people he claimed he was trying to liberate. And, the debt skyrocketed during so-called "Iraqi Freedom." Any increase since 2009 has far more to do with Boehner than ever it did Obama. If you'd just consider it, we'll be better off.
CircleCityEric 9 months ago
@CircleCityEric so hows that war in Libya going??
pauliewalnuts1156 9 months ago
@CircleCityEric YOUR AN IDIOT TO MAKE THAT COMMENT, THIS CARTOON SIMPLY SHOWS WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE VOTED FOR THIS STUPID PRESIDENT. VOTE FOR RON PAUL OR HERMAIN CAIN
assetoverflow 9 months ago
@assetoverflow Not on your life. I'm not one of them, and I voted for him. I'm an American. You ay you are, but you don't act like one.
CircleCityEric 9 months ago
@CircleCityEric everyone likes the 1st amendment until someone says something they don't like. the cartoon is true the comments were actually made by obama voters if you can find a way to defend obama please let me know. he has lied so many times including lies about taxes, earmarks, transparency, end the war, etc.
assetoverflow 7 months ago
@assetoverflow Prove it came from Obama voters, pipsqueak(s)!
I don't need to defend him; his actions speak for themselves. He managed to prevent the Tea Party Terrorists in Congress a) from shutting the government down which would've depleted everybody's purses and b) from defaulting on our loans & debt which AGAIN would've depleted everyone's purses. Face it, little one(s). Obama saved your life. Get it in your head(s).
CircleCityEric 7 months ago
@assetoverflow Political Correctness is Tyranny and Un-American.."As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy (1802-1837)
pauliewalnuts1156 2 months ago
@CircleCityEric Thats cool because Obama is wiping his ass with the Constitution
pauliewalnuts1156 9 months ago
@pauliewalnuts1156 If that's the best you can do, you need to get out from under your rock more than once a year. If Obama wipes his ass with the Constitution, Sarah Palin uses it to plug up holes in her distributor shaft, and John Boehner uses it for wallpaper.
As for Libya, ask the NATO members across the ocean. When you wake up and smell the clumsiness, you'd realize that our presence there isn't a hundredth what it was in Iraq under Bush & Cheney. Only a naive fool would blame Obama.
CircleCityEric 9 months ago
@CircleCityEric OBAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
you launch into Bush sucks, foreign policy rant, but this video is not about thant.. pls comment on the real people that thought they were getting Free "Obama Money" because they voted for him .. Hmm
pauliewalnuts1156 8 months ago
@pauliewalnuts1156 That's not why they voted for him. They voted for him for the same reason anybody (supposedly) votes for a President. Because, they trusted him to delegate over the needs of every American citizen. If the material in this offensive video were published in a newspaper in the 1890's, it'd be criticized as "yellow journalism."
Despite their anti-Obama "unity," all the parties this video benefits are otherwise divided. This is an attempt to similarly divide the Dems. FAILED!
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
@CircleCityEric Obama Money
pauliewalnuts1156 8 months ago
@pauliewalnuts1156 Obviously, you can't think of anything else, and it's not even true. Get real. You're expecting the same stupid thing from the Republicans, aren't you? Isn't that what you wanted from Reagan? Trickle-down money?
CircleCityEric 8 months ago
I think that white guy is the SADDEST of all.
tubeviewerX20 1 year ago
Look at the article on democraticnationalcommittee [dot] org
"Arizona Bill Moves Forward: Eligibility Issue Refuses to Go Away"
JesusDillinger 1 year ago
She knows where's it from she's just embarassed to admit it!
mrmabstoa 1 year ago
I AM TIRED OF YOU RACISTS...TIRED, TIRED OF ALL YOU HATERS. OBAMA IS THE GREATEST. OBAMA BROUGHT CHANGE, WHY CANT U IDIOT REDNECKS SEE THIS?? HE IS HOPE. DO U HATE HOPE???? nah jk, he sucks. good vid
MyPasswordIsAlpha 1 year ago
@MyPasswordIsAlpha: TYRINICAL POLICIES, GREED, AND/OR STUPIDITY are NOT monopolized by any race (as evidenced by your and others positions here).
These are NOT race isstes "Rainman"......Rather "common sense" (pretty much explaining your inability to grasp).
Harpenfarker 1 year ago
Obama got the money from the bank he works for called the federal reserve, a private predatory lending corp. that has a army of tax /interest collectors we call the IRS. We as a country will never get out of debt between illegal Latin immigrants sending the u.s. dollars back home to Guadalajara and the Federal Reserve destroying it. I love America!!!
Mschattrj 1 year ago
@Mschattrj
I love America too
I hope something can save it
Gen3Benz 1 year ago 2
pauliewalnuts1156: How can you say get back to the Constitution?? Are you nuts??!! Obama has this all under control he is "The Great One" after all! These stupid people in this video make this college student sick. You are spending MY MONEY you morons! Wake up and get your ass in gear and start working. Not going and waiting in line for Obama Money! Hurry up November!
TheWake247 2 years ago
@TheWake247: OK GENIUS......and when YOU find YOUR "take home earnings" equal 1 or 2 days of your 5 to 6 day work week AFTER the taxes (that don't mean much to you NOW) have been taken (BEFORE you receieve YOUR pay) leaving you unable to support YOUR family, YOUR degree won't mean much......and (unless your dumber than your comment suggests) I wager YOUR ASS will be climbing on the "Social Services Train" before NOBODY can pay these taxes ((look up the "Calderone" government wise guy).
Harpenfarker 1 year ago
@Harpenfarker "Wise Guy", We can always print more money. Who really cares about inflation anyway! I don't think you caught my sarcasm in the last comment but it's ok! LOL Please get out and vote these Progressives out of Office in November! Stop the theives in Washington from stealing more of my generations money as well as MY MONEY!
TheWake247 1 year ago
He has a stash.. its called your backpocket, your childrens backpocket and your grandchildrens backpocket
Please get back to the Constitution and cut this big government socialist garbage
pauliewalnuts1156 2 years ago 10
Excellent!
LizzyxDarcy 2 years ago
"You People" are crazy! Obama is a GREAT person! He is giving out billions of dollars out of his PERSONAL stash!! How can you not like him!?!?
TheWake247 2 years ago
That was great.
Cannile 2 years ago
This is funny, but also sad. Your average Nignog has no concept of how government funding works. They literally do not understand that "government" money comes from people who work and pay taxes.
mikerolf1 2 years ago
@mikerolf1: What I find truley frightening is the fact that between 50 & 55% of America's electorate is registered Democrat who exibit a tendancy to VOTE democrat regardless of candidate character (save previous transgression record") and they fail to realize/understand that with only 20% of the American society validating they are "liberal" (progressivs?, socialists?, communists?) they further fail to see these "liberal" (progressivs?, socialists?, communists?) now define their party platform!
Harpenfarker 1 year ago
Very accurate
ValerieBarlow 2 years ago
I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
TheNintendhoe 2 years ago 11
I lol'd
AnonShawi 2 years ago 3
Nice.
SlappyThePenguin 2 years ago