I heard about this... Apparently this was a mule car that I got to go for a ride in New Years eve 2008-09. I heard some of the guys took the car out back of GM Canada and did this until the tire fell off.... Apprently management was not very happy and either some lost thier jobs or were in deep shit!
Either way I think it's awesome and great advertisement for a car that's built for it.
Nice car but overpriced just like they overpriced the SSR and the new GTO which is why they floped in sales and were sent over seas and sold for half for what they went for here "thanx alot GM' I will stick with my 69 Z28
yea you would think with all the hp they put under the hood of these things (even with the V6) that they would have splurged for the posi, it deffinently would have brought down the 0-60 a bit (which is already imprressive). no worries though, im sure in a year or two there will be a huge after market for these things.
Sweet car but i still prefer the challenger. the side profile of the camaro is beautiful but i dont like the front end so much. and the rear end looks like someone rear-ended a corvette. for the most part, the challenger is nicer. the front shows off its vintage influence and is boldly dodge and the rear end looks pretty good too
The front end is gorgeous.. mean,... hungry, and I've said that about the rearend before.. but this is a beautiful car.. and I cant wait formine to get here!
why the fuck are people comparing SL500, M5, GT2, GTR and ZR1? the camaro competition is challengers, mustang, 370Z, G37, and gen coupes. i know every body wants it to be faster and cheaper but fuck you don't like it watch another video. the people brought back the camaro. GM made the camaro because people wrote to them saying make the camaro. the cobalt SS was its replacement.
My personal opinion, so please don' try to argue opinions: The new Camaro is too bulky. As are the new Charger and Challenger. Mustang also bulked up a bit over that last couple of redesigns. Some current American trend or something?
Also the Camaro looks a lot like the Challenger I think. A lot. Enthusiasts, I'm sot saying its ugly. Just a bit too bulky
the reason for the "bulking up" is some stupid pedestrian crash law, where their must be air between the hood and the engine, and also because some people are too fuckin stupid to wear seatbelts the companies are forced to protect them from themselves by making the roofs higher. its a trend all over the world.
My Yaris has a 2 foot long hood and weighs 2400 pounds. It still got 4 star frontal and 3 star side crash rating. At 3860 lbs the camaro is a big pig. It needs to be at 3400 lbs, nipping at the 3200 lb corvette's heels, just like it's nipping at the corvette's heels in the power, suspension, tire and transmission departments.
ye i can't figure out where all the extra weight is going. i know that they designed the camaro to be SLIGHTLY more livable everyday than the corvette, but i don't think back seats make up for the 600 pounds of extra weight. Im certain chevy does this on purpose (adding as much weight as they can wherever they can) i think they purposely cripple it so that it won't ever compete with the vette because that would be bad for business and theyd never sell another C6.
added weight comes from all the safety stuff packed into new cars these days...... Corvette is light because it is built on an aluminum space frame. The Camaro is not........
ye but the vette also has some primitive equipment to bring the price down such as leaf springs, so why can't the camaro adopt that same philosophy, lighten up the frame, but at the same time make it a little bit smaller, or sacrifice a bit of ride quality to ensure its lighter. as far as i know another big goal for the camaro and the vette alike is to have performance with decent fuel economy, so why not make it lighter, thatll increase speed, economy, cornering, everything
Why do you call the transverse mounted carbon fiber leaf spring that the corvette uses primitive? No other manufacturer has ever used that and the $100k corvette can outcorner any (US legal) production car at any price on the skidpad and can beat any car under $500k around any track as well as beat $million+ cars like the Veyron and Zonda F. Calling the corvette suspension primitive is like calling an F1 engine primitive because it uses the 18th century technology called "internal combustion."
because they ARE primitive. im not bashing it, i adore the corvette, its probably my 3rd favorite car. but its a known downfall of the car. look at how brilliant it is now, the Zr1 is scaring the crap out of ferrari, it even forced mercedes into designing the Black series to compete with it, but think of how much BETTER it could be with a better set of springs. leaf springs are cheap to replace though, which i like very much.
im pretty sure its designed to make sure the vette is that LITTLE bit better. its like porsche with the cayman and the 911. if both cars costed the same amount of money the cayman would be a HELL of a lot faster, and as it is now, its almost on par with a 911 carrera S, same with the camaro and the vette the camaro is nearly on par with the 6 for a lot less money, and if they didn't weigh it down it would be better, not better than a Z06 but for sure the C6. its all business stuff.
well those are cars within one brand. of course they aren't going to make cars that compete with one another. the pontiac banshee was the base of a couple corvette designs and if i remember correctly was actually superior to the vette. it never made it to production because the vette was the top of the food chain for gm
also how does the camaro look anything like the challenger? theres not a thing thats similar about them. i could understand if you said camaro and mustang, but the camaro and challenger look absolutely nothing alike. not even a little bit.
We can't really argue matters of opinion. I've read other people's comments saying the same thing.
Whats similar? The profile, especially the shoulder line above the rear wheels. The side window shapes are identical on both cars, as are the roof lines, front to back. The grills on both cars are wide and straight-ish and have a smaller one right underneath. Both are bulky. Both have throwback styling queues. Look at them in the same color, you'll see. The same? No. But very similar.
hmm. seen in both colors you may have something there, but thats the typical shape of ALL muscle cars, even the mustang has that shape. thats the definitive muscle car shape. just like a lot of mid engined cars share a similar shape. ALL suvs have pretty much the same shape, etc.
Touche. Not to say that the Camaro or Challenger is ugly, or that they suck (cause I rather the like the Challenger and the SS Camaro has M3 performance). Just some similar features. But I can't talk. My favorite car, the Porsche GT2 looks exactly like my second favorite, the GT3, lol.
ye but they ARE the same lol. thats like comparing an SL500 with an SL65 AMG Black. speaking of those GT2's i saw one on the road today now that the snow is gone. man are those sons of bitches ever loud. great car.
No, I know, pretty much the same accept for the whole turbo vs normally aspirated thing. Yeah, and so great they're running around $190k as far as I know, geez! A man can dream though, a man can dream...
ah i know how you feel man. I've been dreaming of a 1968 Shelby GT500 for as long as i can remember...i don't really see that one coming true any time in the foreseable future lol. i don't think theres too many of them left, and i think they run for $140 000 for a decent condition one to $300 000 for showroom condition with low miles. i'll always have pictures at least lol.
eeehhh not sure i like this design.. the back n fround ends are so high, i loved how low the old f-bodys are, no car is like that anymore :( stupid pedestrian impact protection.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
im a hater because it is a big lug, no finesse, just a big motor. at least honda is innovative and uses brain power (ie VTec in 1990). The problem with american cars is that the CEOs of these companies only worry about current stock price to boost their salaries and they dont care about the future because that is someone else's problem.
well sure its no match for a honda civic with a fart can, a ply wood spoiler, and a non functional hood scoop, but id say its 425 horsepower 6.2 litre monster of a fucking engine is more than enough to match anything else. what a stupid fuckin moron. right now this is probably the most important vehicle being produced in america. fucking retard. if you have an extra chromosome STAY OFF YOUTUBE. can i ask why you even clicked on the video?
I am talking about engineering not about a big engine. If honda made a 6.2 litre it would make the GM motor look like your tiny dick. Fucking stupid third world american, fuck you and the new 1.2 trillion dollars you printed out of thin air. soon you will be using your ipod to dig worms out of the earth for lunch....sucker!!!
honda doesnt make a 6.2 because they dont know what the fuck theyre doing. honda civic gets 92 horsepower from a 2.0 litre engine. if thats not piss poor i dont know what is. and ACTUALLY im not american you stupid fuckin moron, and even though im not, america is probably STILL one of the wealthiest nations on earth....hardly 3rd world. what a fuckin retard. heres what you should do. take a thumbtack put it point up on the desk infront of you, and headbutt it until you pass out. retard.
in 1990 honda got 270 from a 3lt without turbo using their fuckin brains by creating vtec, their 6.2 would produce 558 hp even back in 1990. Nobody is cool by creating a big motor to get big horsepower, even a fuckin trackor company can do that. It also shows how stupid you are because america owes over 70 trillion. When you owe more than you are worth, you are fuckin broke. You are lucky you are from canada (so am I) or else I would really say something nasty to you u dumb shit
no actually honda has never EVER put 270 stock horsepower into a car that wasn't an NSX. and that wasn't in 1990. 270 from a 3 litre still isn't very impressive. thats about average. that still isn't 100 hp per litre. ferrari right now is making 510 horsepower from a 4.3. THATS fucking impressive. you show me honda doing something like that maybe ill change my mind. honda is the most overrated company ON. THE. PLANET.
go ahead say "something nasty" you loser. i kinda wish you were american right now as youre just perpetuating the stereotype that canadians don't know fuck all about cars, and thats why we haven't got a car company of our own. way to bring down the nation.
Don't hate because you drive a mustang. Not everyone is cool enough to drive a Chevy Camaro.
willghass 5 months ago
poor rednecks cant even afford a BMW :P
saucemk 9 months ago
challenger is better than that piece of cra
p comaro
wdm60 1 year ago
@wdm60
Camaro is a pieace of garbage. Agreed.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
I heard about this... Apparently this was a mule car that I got to go for a ride in New Years eve 2008-09. I heard some of the guys took the car out back of GM Canada and did this until the tire fell off.... Apprently management was not very happy and either some lost thier jobs or were in deep shit!
Either way I think it's awesome and great advertisement for a car that's built for it.
Badg356mt 1 year ago
damn makes me wanna play some forza. lolz
pianoboy1952 1 year ago
better than bmw m3
RealJakob 1 year ago
Did anyone notice the puddle of liquid ( probably bleach) the car started in?
kagemono 1 year ago
wtf after image of the v6, I dont get it?
Scorpion7substance 1 year ago
those are $1900 tires you're burning
tbursee 1 year ago
nice vid!
but whith programm have you edited this movie ?
swsthebest1994 1 year ago
that looks like an old junk
inserto1000 1 year ago
wtf is that the v6 engine
love this cat
lifesnojoke333 2 years ago
it has a V8 engine,
Roguekillaz 2 years ago
nahh its a v8 just look under the hood that v shape right over the chevy sign means its a v8 if its not their its a v6
chickenjoe719 2 years ago
no it's not, look at the mail slot on top of bumper!
camaro88iroc 2 years ago
dawg dat bitch cuz
69NEKENIEH69 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Crap car.
1BadMopho 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I as afraid this was going to happen with the majority of the new Camaros.
Shame.
ShortySIG552 2 years ago
thats what there made for dude
blackice4lifeda 2 years ago
Nice car but overpriced just like they overpriced the SSR and the new GTO which is why they floped in sales and were sent over seas and sold for half for what they went for here "thanx alot GM' I will stick with my 69 Z28
vitro48 2 years ago
Man, this video is frickin sick! NICE! I love MAROS!
GoldAlero2002 2 years ago
new camaro not that bad.just doesn't excite me
torqtoyz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow a auto doin a burout how gay no clutch no balls =) car ugly anyway
crxpro1 2 years ago
i wish they came with positive traction rear ends : (
nickrd10bk 2 years ago
yea you would think with all the hp they put under the hood of these things (even with the V6) that they would have splurged for the posi, it deffinently would have brought down the 0-60 a bit (which is already imprressive). no worries though, im sure in a year or two there will be a huge after market for these things.
ihatecivics7 2 years ago
dude they do come with possi on the ss im not sure about the v6
blackice4lifeda 2 years ago
thats pretty awsome bro i might go get one lol
nickrd10bk 2 years ago
Bumblebee transform
PunkMartyr 2 years ago 11
They should make a Transformers "pack" or themed body and color.
K9Beauty 2 years ago
They did. It's available now.
gunzkevin 2 years ago
Sweet car but i still prefer the challenger. the side profile of the camaro is beautiful but i dont like the front end so much. and the rear end looks like someone rear-ended a corvette. for the most part, the challenger is nicer. the front shows off its vintage influence and is boldly dodge and the rear end looks pretty good too
4point7Dakota 2 years ago
The front end is gorgeous.. mean,... hungry, and I've said that about the rearend before.. but this is a beautiful car.. and I cant wait formine to get here!
avol2 2 years ago
will the v6 burn em like dat
howdoustop25 2 years ago
yes
the standard v6 makes 304 hp
kyl75 2 years ago
That's it? Just doing the same burn out over and over again?
That's not what you do with a car when you have it for a day to test drive... You remind me of the bogans from here in Australia.
TheMuxXx 2 years ago
I want to see what a Yaris looks like after a 3/4 ton Suburban hits it head on at 65 miles per hour. I am glad I dont drive/like imports.
macvicar24 2 years ago
hey it doesnt look like a catfish
osz71 2 years ago
What kind of fucking idiot does this to a brand new car? What a moron.
2muchmark 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my dad does
danny096315 2 years ago
thats not coming out anytime soon since GM is so fucked atm but i hurd they have a z/28 version with 550 horses :O
Xisforstyle 2 years ago
and thats just the V6!!
=)
StoryByPhoto 2 years ago
yes even the V6 has 300 HP and the 6 liter V8 has 400 HP. A nice turbo or supercharger will boost the 400 up to about 550 on the street.
CREDITS4CARBON 2 years ago
why the fuck are people comparing SL500, M5, GT2, GTR and ZR1? the camaro competition is challengers, mustang, 370Z, G37, and gen coupes. i know every body wants it to be faster and cheaper but fuck you don't like it watch another video. the people brought back the camaro. GM made the camaro because people wrote to them saying make the camaro. the cobalt SS was its replacement.
midnightZLS1 2 years ago
My personal opinion, so please don' try to argue opinions: The new Camaro is too bulky. As are the new Charger and Challenger. Mustang also bulked up a bit over that last couple of redesigns. Some current American trend or something?
Also the Camaro looks a lot like the Challenger I think. A lot. Enthusiasts, I'm sot saying its ugly. Just a bit too bulky
onejace 2 years ago
the reason for the "bulking up" is some stupid pedestrian crash law, where their must be air between the hood and the engine, and also because some people are too fuckin stupid to wear seatbelts the companies are forced to protect them from themselves by making the roofs higher. its a trend all over the world.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
My Yaris has a 2 foot long hood and weighs 2400 pounds. It still got 4 star frontal and 3 star side crash rating. At 3860 lbs the camaro is a big pig. It needs to be at 3400 lbs, nipping at the 3200 lb corvette's heels, just like it's nipping at the corvette's heels in the power, suspension, tire and transmission departments.
ldmcnutt 2 years ago
ye i can't figure out where all the extra weight is going. i know that they designed the camaro to be SLIGHTLY more livable everyday than the corvette, but i don't think back seats make up for the 600 pounds of extra weight. Im certain chevy does this on purpose (adding as much weight as they can wherever they can) i think they purposely cripple it so that it won't ever compete with the vette because that would be bad for business and theyd never sell another C6.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
added weight comes from all the safety stuff packed into new cars these days...... Corvette is light because it is built on an aluminum space frame. The Camaro is not........
05RedSS 2 years ago
ye but the vette also has some primitive equipment to bring the price down such as leaf springs, so why can't the camaro adopt that same philosophy, lighten up the frame, but at the same time make it a little bit smaller, or sacrifice a bit of ride quality to ensure its lighter. as far as i know another big goal for the camaro and the vette alike is to have performance with decent fuel economy, so why not make it lighter, thatll increase speed, economy, cornering, everything
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Why do you call the transverse mounted carbon fiber leaf spring that the corvette uses primitive? No other manufacturer has ever used that and the $100k corvette can outcorner any (US legal) production car at any price on the skidpad and can beat any car under $500k around any track as well as beat $million+ cars like the Veyron and Zonda F. Calling the corvette suspension primitive is like calling an F1 engine primitive because it uses the 18th century technology called "internal combustion."
ldmcnutt 2 years ago
because they ARE primitive. im not bashing it, i adore the corvette, its probably my 3rd favorite car. but its a known downfall of the car. look at how brilliant it is now, the Zr1 is scaring the crap out of ferrari, it even forced mercedes into designing the Black series to compete with it, but think of how much BETTER it could be with a better set of springs. leaf springs are cheap to replace though, which i like very much.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
im pretty sure its designed to make sure the vette is that LITTLE bit better. its like porsche with the cayman and the 911. if both cars costed the same amount of money the cayman would be a HELL of a lot faster, and as it is now, its almost on par with a 911 carrera S, same with the camaro and the vette the camaro is nearly on par with the 6 for a lot less money, and if they didn't weigh it down it would be better, not better than a Z06 but for sure the C6. its all business stuff.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Using your logic, how can the Elise/exige weight 2000 lbs and still pass the crash tests? BTW, the 3200 lb base corvette is a steel frame.
ldmcnutt 2 years ago
gm has been known to cripple cars in order to not compete with the vette. look up the pontiac banshee
WIGTRON5000 2 years ago
every car company does it, its call marketing. porsche - boxster, cayman, 911. 3.2 - 3.4 - 3.6
blaziankhmer 2 years ago
well those are cars within one brand. of course they aren't going to make cars that compete with one another. the pontiac banshee was the base of a couple corvette designs and if i remember correctly was actually superior to the vette. it never made it to production because the vette was the top of the food chain for gm
WIGTRON5000 2 years ago
fuck ur Yaris thats a chick car pussy!! this is a 427hp car not a 128hp or what ever shit ur has
Caliluv562 2 years ago
128hp? more like 28hp
blaziankhmer 2 years ago
also how does the camaro look anything like the challenger? theres not a thing thats similar about them. i could understand if you said camaro and mustang, but the camaro and challenger look absolutely nothing alike. not even a little bit.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
We can't really argue matters of opinion. I've read other people's comments saying the same thing.
Whats similar? The profile, especially the shoulder line above the rear wheels. The side window shapes are identical on both cars, as are the roof lines, front to back. The grills on both cars are wide and straight-ish and have a smaller one right underneath. Both are bulky. Both have throwback styling queues. Look at them in the same color, you'll see. The same? No. But very similar.
onejace 2 years ago
hmm. seen in both colors you may have something there, but thats the typical shape of ALL muscle cars, even the mustang has that shape. thats the definitive muscle car shape. just like a lot of mid engined cars share a similar shape. ALL suvs have pretty much the same shape, etc.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Touche. Not to say that the Camaro or Challenger is ugly, or that they suck (cause I rather the like the Challenger and the SS Camaro has M3 performance). Just some similar features. But I can't talk. My favorite car, the Porsche GT2 looks exactly like my second favorite, the GT3, lol.
onejace 2 years ago
ye but they ARE the same lol. thats like comparing an SL500 with an SL65 AMG Black. speaking of those GT2's i saw one on the road today now that the snow is gone. man are those sons of bitches ever loud. great car.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
No, I know, pretty much the same accept for the whole turbo vs normally aspirated thing. Yeah, and so great they're running around $190k as far as I know, geez! A man can dream though, a man can dream...
onejace 2 years ago
ah i know how you feel man. I've been dreaming of a 1968 Shelby GT500 for as long as i can remember...i don't really see that one coming true any time in the foreseable future lol. i don't think theres too many of them left, and i think they run for $140 000 for a decent condition one to $300 000 for showroom condition with low miles. i'll always have pictures at least lol.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
I thought these things were supposed to come out of the factory with a posi rear end. or was that only the new challenger?
sodapop503 2 years ago
Now thats the way to test drive a camaro.
GerryK61 2 years ago
eeehhh not sure i like this design.. the back n fround ends are so high, i loved how low the old f-bodys are, no car is like that anymore :( stupid pedestrian impact protection.
lejink 2 years ago
can i plz have your camaro ss plzzzzzz
silentassassin224 2 years ago
These are some shity ass burnouts but still, a 2010 Camaro doing a burnout is cool.
supercarkid 2 years ago
damn, that bowtie looks good on the front of that monster.
eddiehardaman 2 years ago
Looks great to me.
Don't worry about the haters there is plenty of room on the curb waiting for the bus for them to watch.
zenia921 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a hunk of shit, no wonder the company is about to go under
bluedonkeyman 2 years ago
Comment removed
soccerboi1514 2 years ago
Don't be a hater because you drive a civic
scottnwho 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im a hater because it is a big lug, no finesse, just a big motor. at least honda is innovative and uses brain power (ie VTec in 1990). The problem with american cars is that the CEOs of these companies only worry about current stock price to boost their salaries and they dont care about the future because that is someone else's problem.
bluedonkeyman 2 years ago
well sure its no match for a honda civic with a fart can, a ply wood spoiler, and a non functional hood scoop, but id say its 425 horsepower 6.2 litre monster of a fucking engine is more than enough to match anything else. what a stupid fuckin moron. right now this is probably the most important vehicle being produced in america. fucking retard. if you have an extra chromosome STAY OFF YOUTUBE. can i ask why you even clicked on the video?
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
I am talking about engineering not about a big engine. If honda made a 6.2 litre it would make the GM motor look like your tiny dick. Fucking stupid third world american, fuck you and the new 1.2 trillion dollars you printed out of thin air. soon you will be using your ipod to dig worms out of the earth for lunch....sucker!!!
bluedonkeyman 2 years ago
honda doesnt make a 6.2 because they dont know what the fuck theyre doing. honda civic gets 92 horsepower from a 2.0 litre engine. if thats not piss poor i dont know what is. and ACTUALLY im not american you stupid fuckin moron, and even though im not, america is probably STILL one of the wealthiest nations on earth....hardly 3rd world. what a fuckin retard. heres what you should do. take a thumbtack put it point up on the desk infront of you, and headbutt it until you pass out. retard.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
in 1990 honda got 270 from a 3lt without turbo using their fuckin brains by creating vtec, their 6.2 would produce 558 hp even back in 1990. Nobody is cool by creating a big motor to get big horsepower, even a fuckin trackor company can do that. It also shows how stupid you are because america owes over 70 trillion. When you owe more than you are worth, you are fuckin broke. You are lucky you are from canada (so am I) or else I would really say something nasty to you u dumb shit
bluedonkeyman 2 years ago
no actually honda has never EVER put 270 stock horsepower into a car that wasn't an NSX. and that wasn't in 1990. 270 from a 3 litre still isn't very impressive. thats about average. that still isn't 100 hp per litre. ferrari right now is making 510 horsepower from a 4.3. THATS fucking impressive. you show me honda doing something like that maybe ill change my mind. honda is the most overrated company ON. THE. PLANET.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
go ahead say "something nasty" you loser. i kinda wish you were american right now as youre just perpetuating the stereotype that canadians don't know fuck all about cars, and thats why we haven't got a car company of our own. way to bring down the nation.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Look at the Canadians fighting, eh?
fire398017 2 years ago
LMAOOOO "honda civic with a fart can, a ply wood spoiler, and a nonfunctional hood scoop"
Priceless!!!
twenty514 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i dont find this car at all attractive
Cfurlong37 2 years ago
its easy then you don't have the camaro Soul :)
Bader88 2 years ago
Comment removed
soccerboi1514 2 years ago
Then why did you look at the video...You can tell us the real reason....you can't afford it.
scottnwho 2 years ago
the real reason i looked at the video is because im subscribed to leftlanenews so i had to click on it to get it off my home page.
Cfurlong37 2 years ago
thats right keep telling yourself that. keep telling yourself that your civic is better looking....just because you can't have one.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
nah im alll about the american made, just not chev, there shit
Cfurlong37 2 years ago