Great topic to tackled on. Thanks for illustrating the tips and techniques for breaking down bigger issues into smaller ones. Indeed, he distilled an overwhelming information for the convenience of everyone.
Great topic! But I want so much more -- there's nothing else on Youtube for Eric Berlow. TEDTalk needs to reprieve this talk and give him waaaaay more time!
take that algae and top predators graph and make it into a graph that relates/predicts the effect of one social/political/economic group to another inside a single country, state, city, house. it might illuminate some abstract illnesses.
@alvisc2002 he can't give an answer because he hardly knows anything about/has control over the operation in Afghan, but his insight/methodology in approaching a given problem might help the people who do. His goal stated in the beginning was to "hope to convince you that complex doesn't always equal complicated", in other words, he wanted to give us common folks a tool to better make up our minds about what we see and hear. 3 minutes was all he needed!
There you go! The solution to the Afghan problem in three minutes...oh what...you didn't get it? No, neither did I. In fact, 3 minutes was too much of this. Without properly defining the problem (foreign imperialism) then you cannot solve the problem. Doesn't matter how complex or simple.
@qigong1001 well normally i solve the yosemetie species problem with automatic weapons, alcohol, and lots and lots of uncontrolled firepower. i wonder if that same system would work in afghanistan.
Still alot of work before unified science will poke its head out, but within ten years the world is ready (obv. in my crazed opinion) - he's obviously closing in on sociology (ex Zygmunt Bauman) and the connectivety described within todays society makes great examples.
i never noticed how neo-con ted was before... maybe my perspective has changed, but these are not the ideas of the future, these are remnants of the reactionary ideas of the 1800s.
the only problem with this is you need enough people with their capacities developed enough to see through the complexity and actualize the change- seems to me this is still a emerging talent. But with more and more people beginning to think in systems i'm hopeful we'll reach a tipping point and begin applying these insights in dealing with the complex problems facing society today...
@wodahsking he said something like: many complex diagrams/presentation may seem more complicated on the surface, but sometimes, the complexity actually make subjects or topics ezier to understad
actualy he said alot :-) you need to go deeper in your thinking
he said fair availibility of key services is the best way to gain support .
he said that if you "zoom out" you get a better picture . zoom out and you will get what i got witch is basicaly impliying things ... like military support is not realy necessary and the sphere of influance to get support is verry narrow .
@romeoneverdies Exactly.. Conclusion: Stop killing people and start SOLVING PROBLEMS... providing the basic necessities we ALL need.
War is big business, the war on terrorism is just the excuse. The World Trade Center was blown up (scientific fact), marxism/communism has never been tried but people of the West have been brainwashed that it is the worst of all evils.. Capitalism is the real cause of our problems since it is competition between people and holds us from coming together.
A person talking about complex systems, and only has 3 and half minutes to make his point. To bad it's not long enough for him to make his point, it feels like half his presentation's missing.
In other news, half the video was a commercial. Ironic.
He boils it down to two points, but the problem is that each of these points is much more complex than he suggests.
HOW do you engage with ethnic rivalries and religious beliefs? (HOW can we get them to stop hating each other, and HOW can we be credible when we are mostly not Muslims? We're infidels!)
And HOW do you get fair, transparent economic development? (Usually NOT by foreign aid that goes through governments. This usually enhances corruption.)
@freesk8 It's still a whole lot easier than the original diagram suggests.
You are missing the point of the talk: I think everyone will agree that not every problem has simple solutions. The war in Afghanistan will not be solved easily.
What he showed was a good way to reduce the complexity of difficult problems and isolate the factors that matter, so that one may start thinking about the solutions. Instead of being tangled up in a diagram.
@hwnzero looking from the insight out problematic for you? never cotton to those who went by rote in life, consequently due to brain injury life had me writ in a way it takes thinking to wrap your mind round the notes we share..
so true, and when you begin from the 'no matter our discipline, views. and any else, we are speaking of one and the same universe. . it is complex enough to hold all our individual truths as . . like an MRI scan of a certain as seen from their particular. . . how do we fit them all into the holographic nature of creation. do the stars fabricate the sound vibrations each plant picks up on in support of the many life forms spirited in matter. its the plants that air the breath of our being
@Wollff85 I think it is silly that our government made what amounts to a food web with no variables relating any of the elements in it. Only laying out some kind of mathematical relationship among them would be worse. You cannot reduce a nation and its cultures down to a chart. To think otherwise is absurd. The entire thing has to be arbitrary on some level. I do appreciate that you saw some substance lurking behind my indignation. Look up Carl Menger and get back to me.
@Tradd9 your statement looses it's weight when you make big mistakes too, like a gross overgeneralization say "x always gets y wrong". Substitute always with often or most of the time, or something similar, and your stament carries more weight.
Regardless of ecologists skills of statistical analysis, the methodology he uses is valid and usefull. Applied mathematicians often use a similar method.
You need to expand your data set, and then filter it, to get to the simple relevant things you need.
@gulllars The first paragraph made no sense. The second and third paragraphs sound like someone trying to defend the validity of conclusions based on poor analysis. In summary, you've no idea what you're talking about.
@Tradd9 the first paragraph critisized your overgeneralization of ecologists, and that being a weak basis for always distrusting them with prejudice.
The second paragraph is a statement saying the method is usefull (not how it is) and used by mathematicians, without expanding on it or deffending it.
The third paragraph summarizes to it being usefull to take a step back and look at the whole picture before deciding what points of it you want to look at.
@gulllars Once again, you are barely coherent. It isnt an overgeneralisation of ecologist to say that they get their stats wrong most of the time. This is a fact. It has been shown time and time again by statisticians for the past 50 years.
Its completely unclear what you mean by "the method".
And the fact that you have no idea what you're on about is evidenced by the statement "hey, lets take a look at the big picture". This is just a euphamism for "pfft, i know nothing about data analysis".
@Tradd9 saying they are wrong most of the time is different from saying they are wrong all of the time. If you have data proving they are wrong most of the time, i won't fight that point. Disregarding ALL because MOST are wrong may work in daily life, but it means you may disregard someone that is right from time to time.
The method is, to expand the data set, identify relations within it, and then filter it for the parts relevant to your work on the data.
@Tradd9 to expand on my latest hobby project using a similar approach.
I've done benchmarking on Solid State Drives (SSDs) for a few years.
Recently i looked at performance scaling of SSDs by benchmarking in 6 dimensions (6 variables scaled according to eachother) and filtering a data set of over 10.000 data points pr configuration to find how scaling is influenced by the variables, and how this relates to the configurations.
I think I knew that already ..When I learn stuff..and really just know all of the details you finally get the gist of it..the stuff that really matters..
I think everybody already has that on an intuitive understanding
He's essentially promoting intuition over cognition. waiting for answers to come over chasing an answer by asking, what is often, the wrong question(s) with your mind.
Sounds all good and well, BUT what did this guy actually explain? These nodes in his slide explained nothing by themselves. I did not learn anything. 'Look at the big picture' is nothing new, where is the idea?
@Nielow100 Mostly, it seemed to me a call to use visualization software to work with and in complexity, rather than around it. It would've been nice to hear A: what software he uses, and B: whether or not said software is open-source (I've no idea about either, sadly), but he definitely showed that complexity needn't frighten us away from a problem.
TED has had some crappy videos lately that seem to be fairly shallow talks based on basic subjects. Given those subjects are possibly important, it is really nice to see a talk about an "idea" or concept or way of thinking. Tragic that this guy only had 3 minutes to talk. "Ideas worth spreading"
In order to simplify complexity one must graphically represent the information. After that is done you need to identify the factor you want to manipulate. Isolate this main factor and disregard the "noise".
i havent seen this yet (still caching) but the title sounds like one of those horrible creationist arguments 'irreducible complexity' or some shit. lol : but my spider senses tell me tedtalks could not possibly stoop that low, so i will watch it in hopes that it isnt.
That really didn't give me any info. I feel like TED on youtube is slipping. It used to be there were always talks I'd be interested in. Not anymore. And many are very superficial and/or too short.
Summary: If something is complex, that means theres more information to work with, and you can get easier answers by just looking at the broad picture. Whereas, if you have less information, you need to really work with that information to get answers, and that would be complexity.
I see far more advertising than anyone needs in a day which makes me feel sorry for anyone as they are probably everyone! E-fracking-nuff of the advertising ! People need jobs not some vision of what they cannot buy because they have no income. Mass mental depression serves no one. Get out of your office and into the real world. Go without clean clothes for a month and watch LIFE SUCKS for a better perspective. Prozac is not food.
The subjective nature of what is complex and what is simple, stays the same. It is rather you that changes, due to your perspective. Complex things do not lead to simple, rather, there are more than one way of looking at a problem, and how you look at that problem. In political science, we call this a lens. It is used to look at a problem through certain frames of reference. The problems are neither complicated nor simple, rather they are problems. It is you that makes them one way or the other.
@Brandonduboff in essence, do not fall for his toying around with the idea of complicated and simple, understand the world is not black and white, and can be interpreted in any way, if one is simply looking for an interpretation, or in other words an opinion of how complicated it really is.
@DackIsBack Its all as you think you see it, and not how it "actually is". They are not, "complicated" or "simple" rather you see them as that way. A slice of bread is not morally good, but you can interpret it as good, depending on your perspective. He uses words, which their meaning is mostly just an opinion. Is the glass half full or empty?
@Brandonduboff I think you're playing off the curry onion green olive poppy cheese bread as an extraneous matter when it is of the utmost importance..
as well as taking time with your decisions to way all the angles, leads to more good decisions then rushing and only looking at one or two angles gets you many more poor choices
Don't get me wrong; I like the occasional perv video, but I'm just wondering why so many are related to this one.
warewareno 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good topic and very helpful tips. :D
dayspeace 3 months ago
Great topic to tackled on. Thanks for illustrating the tips and techniques for breaking down bigger issues into smaller ones. Indeed, he distilled an overwhelming information for the convenience of everyone.
insomniacgrace 3 months ago
very good subject about visualization
arekbee 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
make money online without stain
makeassymoney.blogspot.com
gudnewss 3 months ago
Great topic! But I want so much more -- there's nothing else on Youtube for Eric Berlow. TEDTalk needs to reprieve this talk and give him waaaaay more time!
maggiemrust 4 months ago in playlist TED
50% of this TedTalk is infomercials. Simple.
superdiza 5 months ago
hmm... still complex for me... can you simplify it?
Juggernaughty824 6 months ago
take that algae and top predators graph and make it into a graph that relates/predicts the effect of one social/political/economic group to another inside a single country, state, city, house. it might illuminate some abstract illnesses.
xjustamem0ryx 8 months ago in playlist 2011 ones to watch
BULLSHIT
NeckPickup 1 year ago
@NeckPickup goddddddd
gudnewss 3 months ago
@gudnewss true
NeckPickup 3 months ago
uhh... so um... what's the freaking answer?!
i thought he was gonna say "ok so basically, all we have to do is kill bob over here and BOOM!! problem solved baby!!" :P
alvisc2002 1 year ago
Comment removed
Houses0nfire 1 year ago
@alvisc2002 he can't give an answer because he hardly knows anything about/has control over the operation in Afghan, but his insight/methodology in approaching a given problem might help the people who do. His goal stated in the beginning was to "hope to convince you that complex doesn't always equal complicated", in other words, he wanted to give us common folks a tool to better make up our minds about what we see and hear. 3 minutes was all he needed!
Houses0nfire 1 year ago
way too short.................
chengmeiling999 1 year ago
Great sweater.
MrXanderPanda 1 year ago
There you go! The solution to the Afghan problem in three minutes...oh what...you didn't get it? No, neither did I. In fact, 3 minutes was too much of this. Without properly defining the problem (foreign imperialism) then you cannot solve the problem. Doesn't matter how complex or simple.
qigong1001 1 year ago
@qigong1001 well normally i solve the yosemetie species problem with automatic weapons, alcohol, and lots and lots of uncontrolled firepower. i wonder if that same system would work in afghanistan.
alvisc2002 1 year ago
I think the trick is to do a graphic and then extrapolate... so, how do you do a graphic?
leonidasx666 1 year ago
@leonidasx666 by extrapolating it. Duh. :P
alvisc2002 1 year ago
Still alot of work before unified science will poke its head out, but within ten years the world is ready (obv. in my crazed opinion) - he's obviously closing in on sociology (ex Zygmunt Bauman) and the connectivety described within todays society makes great examples.
lassek85 1 year ago
Just seems like a variation of Occam's Razor
vfrederic 1 year ago
Thanks for not saying anything of substance. Geesh, what was the use of this?
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
Does anyone know how to create node graphs similar to the examples in this video? ie. what they're called, what program (he) used, etc..
Adepthood 1 year ago
@Adepthood i think general Mcrystol probably asked the same thing lol.
We give it to the insurgents and it causes their heads to explode.
alvisc2002 1 year ago
1:40 Epic....... I should try that more often.
TheJovanist 1 year ago
Mooar, I want moaaar!
pimpolinka69 1 year ago
i never noticed how neo-con ted was before... maybe my perspective has changed, but these are not the ideas of the future, these are remnants of the reactionary ideas of the 1800s.
AlemanJuan 1 year ago 3
the only problem with this is you need enough people with their capacities developed enough to see through the complexity and actualize the change- seems to me this is still a emerging talent. But with more and more people beginning to think in systems i'm hopeful we'll reach a tipping point and begin applying these insights in dealing with the complex problems facing society today...
CandianBear 1 year ago
WOW!! totally awesome!!
JPRubber2 1 year ago
What did he say?!?!?!
wodahsking 1 year ago
@wodahsking he said something like: many complex diagrams/presentation may seem more complicated on the surface, but sometimes, the complexity actually make subjects or topics ezier to understad
popitypop 1 year ago
hmmm, sounds complex
JosephW99 1 year ago
blackberry girl is so sweet
EMan297007 1 year ago
he said absolutely nothing
matchbox555 1 year ago
@matchbox555
actualy he said alot :-) you need to go deeper in your thinking
he said fair availibility of key services is the best way to gain support .
he said that if you "zoom out" you get a better picture . zoom out and you will get what i got witch is basicaly impliying things ... like military support is not realy necessary and the sphere of influance to get support is verry narrow .
romeoneverdies 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@romeoneverdies yeah like i said, he said nothing.
"zoom out" lol
matchbox555 1 year ago
@romeoneverdies Exactly.. Conclusion: Stop killing people and start SOLVING PROBLEMS... providing the basic necessities we ALL need.
War is big business, the war on terrorism is just the excuse. The World Trade Center was blown up (scientific fact), marxism/communism has never been tried but people of the West have been brainwashed that it is the worst of all evils.. Capitalism is the real cause of our problems since it is competition between people and holds us from coming together.
hede88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well that was a waste of time
matchbox555 1 year ago
Good topic, but too short
CHAS1422 1 year ago 38
i have no fucking idea what he said......someone cut out half of his presentation.
arian50 1 year ago
give the man more time...
Th3Wab3 1 year ago 3
The real irony is that you can only diagram a complex system after the fact, in retrospect, never looking to the future.
innovant2003 1 year ago
Here I will break it down in one sentence for you all.
"People in the big club will be able to get away with crime."
TheJovanist 1 year ago
A simple talk about a complex topic :-)
SirTubelot 1 year ago 3
As much as I love TED, why does a topic as interesting as this get only <3 minutes time?
werecow2003 1 year ago 3
@werecow2003 I know... How annoying. Haha, then you get a commercial that is almost the same length.
ACANOFSODA 1 year ago
@ACANOFSODA lol
MrSnowgum2 5 days ago
needed more time seriously!
Pedraquebrota 1 year ago 53
Poor guy, could've given him a bit more time.. I mean come on TED!
8DX 1 year ago 5
I WANT MORE! .... uh, i mean NEED more to understand enough.
caseyforever 1 year ago 2
@caseyforever I actually couldn't put it any better. That guy left me wanting to learn a lot more about his field.
t3tsuyaguy1 1 year ago
What the shit? I have no idea what I just watched.
Saesegral 1 year ago 4
Damn. Wish he had more time.
gutspraygore 1 year ago 2
So look at the big picture desifer the most relavent links to get your solution!
;) not to shabby
lockitkitten 1 year ago
A person talking about complex systems, and only has 3 and half minutes to make his point. To bad it's not long enough for him to make his point, it feels like half his presentation's missing.
In other news, half the video was a commercial. Ironic.
danthemango 1 year ago
He boils it down to two points, but the problem is that each of these points is much more complex than he suggests.
HOW do you engage with ethnic rivalries and religious beliefs? (HOW can we get them to stop hating each other, and HOW can we be credible when we are mostly not Muslims? We're infidels!)
And HOW do you get fair, transparent economic development? (Usually NOT by foreign aid that goes through governments. This usually enhances corruption.)
It's all harder than it seems.
freesk8 1 year ago
@freesk8 It's still a whole lot easier than the original diagram suggests.
You are missing the point of the talk: I think everyone will agree that not every problem has simple solutions. The war in Afghanistan will not be solved easily.
What he showed was a good way to reduce the complexity of difficult problems and isolate the factors that matter, so that one may start thinking about the solutions. Instead of being tangled up in a diagram.
Wollff85 1 year ago
MUST EAT BREAD.
HDvideosaregood 1 year ago 2
Did you hear the classy music? That means if you buy this product you will be classy.
Khyrid 1 year ago 3
blackberry sucks ...
dermatu 1 year ago
@hwnzero looking from the insight out problematic for you? never cotton to those who went by rote in life, consequently due to brain injury life had me writ in a way it takes thinking to wrap your mind round the notes we share..
HamOnCan 1 year ago
Pretty cool.
furetosan 1 year ago
so true, and when you begin from the 'no matter our discipline, views. and any else, we are speaking of one and the same universe. . it is complex enough to hold all our individual truths as . . like an MRI scan of a certain as seen from their particular. . . how do we fit them all into the holographic nature of creation. do the stars fabricate the sound vibrations each plant picks up on in support of the many life forms spirited in matter. its the plants that air the breath of our being
HamOnCan 1 year ago
Go to 3:40 to see the actual commercial without wasting time on the video (thumb up)
sukablianah2 1 year ago
oh, so that's why i'm so insightful :)
dragonstorm83 1 year ago
delusional
DK0526 1 year ago
This is totally crazy. Is anyone actually taking this seriously???
Wormtail81 1 year ago
@Wormtail81 What a great example of highly minded criticism. "This is totally crazy!", you say.
And nobody knows why.
It is fine if you want to give your opinion, but if you want people not to label you as an idiot, you should state the reasons why you hold them.
Did you never learn that in school?
Wollff85 1 year ago
@Wollff85 I think it is silly that our government made what amounts to a food web with no variables relating any of the elements in it. Only laying out some kind of mathematical relationship among them would be worse. You cannot reduce a nation and its cultures down to a chart. To think otherwise is absurd. The entire thing has to be arbitrary on some level. I do appreciate that you saw some substance lurking behind my indignation. Look up Carl Menger and get back to me.
Wormtail81 1 year ago
The first 30 seconds of what this guy says reaffirm my belief that interventionism in the economy is a terrible idea.
Wormtail81 1 year ago
So, complexity never leads to simplicity. Got it.
Thanks TED!
I'm learning by rejecting this talk as informative and insightful!
Is that how negative leads to positive? Hold on, I'll make a graph.....
niginit 1 year ago
Hey Lady try Android, much better than blackberry. Next time don't bother me when watching videos
truthspeaker20 1 year ago
WTH! The real thing didnt even start!!
kommaV1023 1 year ago
Great talk... I suddenly feel like buying a Blackberry(tm) for some reason.
jaspertine9 1 year ago
It seems like the video was missing important details like:
1. what software is that and where is similar software available?
2. what if you don't have a complete data set
3. who puts in this complex data and organizes the relationships
4. are the nodes "weighted" ?
more.....details......please....but thanks for the introduction.
ELDK2008 1 year ago 3
@ELDK2008 At 1:14 there is a logo saying "Microsoft Research", maybe it's a clue to the software used.
racedaemon 1 year ago
@racedaemon - yeah....I just wish there was a little more but, thanks for that information.
ELDK2008 1 year ago
I don't trust ecologists to predict anything. THEY ALWAYS GET THEIR STATISTICAL ANALYSES WRONG!!
Tradd9 1 year ago
@Tradd9 your statement looses it's weight when you make big mistakes too, like a gross overgeneralization say "x always gets y wrong". Substitute always with often or most of the time, or something similar, and your stament carries more weight.
Regardless of ecologists skills of statistical analysis, the methodology he uses is valid and usefull. Applied mathematicians often use a similar method.
You need to expand your data set, and then filter it, to get to the simple relevant things you need.
gulllars 1 year ago
@gulllars The first paragraph made no sense. The second and third paragraphs sound like someone trying to defend the validity of conclusions based on poor analysis. In summary, you've no idea what you're talking about.
Tradd9 1 year ago
@Tradd9 the first paragraph critisized your overgeneralization of ecologists, and that being a weak basis for always distrusting them with prejudice.
The second paragraph is a statement saying the method is usefull (not how it is) and used by mathematicians, without expanding on it or deffending it.
The third paragraph summarizes to it being usefull to take a step back and look at the whole picture before deciding what points of it you want to look at.
gulllars 1 year ago
@gulllars Once again, you are barely coherent. It isnt an overgeneralisation of ecologist to say that they get their stats wrong most of the time. This is a fact. It has been shown time and time again by statisticians for the past 50 years.
Its completely unclear what you mean by "the method".
And the fact that you have no idea what you're on about is evidenced by the statement "hey, lets take a look at the big picture". This is just a euphamism for "pfft, i know nothing about data analysis".
Tradd9 1 year ago
@Tradd9 saying they are wrong most of the time is different from saying they are wrong all of the time. If you have data proving they are wrong most of the time, i won't fight that point. Disregarding ALL because MOST are wrong may work in daily life, but it means you may disregard someone that is right from time to time.
The method is, to expand the data set, identify relations within it, and then filter it for the parts relevant to your work on the data.
I've done this a bit in hobby projects.
gulllars 1 year ago
@Tradd9 to expand on my latest hobby project using a similar approach.
I've done benchmarking on Solid State Drives (SSDs) for a few years.
Recently i looked at performance scaling of SSDs by benchmarking in 6 dimensions (6 variables scaled according to eachother) and filtering a data set of over 10.000 data points pr configuration to find how scaling is influenced by the variables, and how this relates to the configurations.
gulllars 1 year ago
@gulllars What the hell does this have to do with ecologists getting their statistics wrong!!! Knuckle-head!!
Tradd9 1 year ago
wow, ted! you suck
pixelr0 1 year ago
I would of liked for it to be longer. (That's not what she said)
Aresftfun 1 year ago
crap
madmax10101 1 year ago
To short....wanted more....brilliant idea....but need more
dswellhauser 1 year ago 2
super crap!
misterwipedown 1 year ago
I think I knew that already ..When I learn stuff..and really just know all of the details you finally get the gist of it..the stuff that really matters..
I think everybody already has that on an intuitive understanding
paulthecoolest 1 year ago
@GrudgyDiablo you knew simple solutions could be derived from complex diagrams before watching this video?
SuperAtheist 1 year ago
This video was 60% interesting, 40% rubbish. Can you guess the rubbish part?
AntiProtonBoy 1 year ago
"it is simple when you know how to find the core of the complexity and ignore everything else" Wow, what a genius.
esaman 1 year ago
big up to blackberry!
Mat2DaW 1 year ago
So...Basically find what you're focusing on and point out the main factors? That's how I interpreted it.
GJudgemental 1 year ago
The talk... I disagree with his assessment.
But...
good ad, Blackberry.
kinsmed 1 year ago
what a gimp
RobertoWatchin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The blackberry girl was a fucking hypster I would just slap her in the face THUMBS UP! if you agree :)
SimontheSorceror 1 year ago
I didn't get it
marrydruli 1 year ago
@marrydruli
He's essentially promoting intuition over cognition. waiting for answers to come over chasing an answer by asking, what is often, the wrong question(s) with your mind.
:-)
smudge6699 1 year ago
Sounds all good and well, BUT what did this guy actually explain? These nodes in his slide explained nothing by themselves. I did not learn anything. 'Look at the big picture' is nothing new, where is the idea?
Nielow100 1 year ago 2
@Nielow100 Mostly, it seemed to me a call to use visualization software to work with and in complexity, rather than around it. It would've been nice to hear A: what software he uses, and B: whether or not said software is open-source (I've no idea about either, sadly), but he definitely showed that complexity needn't frighten us away from a problem.
Kojak7snap 1 year ago
I liked the talk. Didn't like the advert at the end. :-)
TheSpankymonkey 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't beleve the commercial, a photographer can not be happy with a phone camera!
brotgans 1 year ago
TED has had some crappy videos lately that seem to be fairly shallow talks based on basic subjects. Given those subjects are possibly important, it is really nice to see a talk about an "idea" or concept or way of thinking. Tragic that this guy only had 3 minutes to talk. "Ideas worth spreading"
Ikhalis 1 year ago 2
That was awesome.
DJGelbart 1 year ago
What the fuck? A frame of the comercial as a Thumbnail? Seriosuly TED? If I was Eric Berlow I'd be pissed of at that.
LeonardLew 1 year ago
@LeonardLew lol
crankthetoto 1 year ago
In order to simplify complexity one must graphically represent the information. After that is done you need to identify the factor you want to manipulate. Isolate this main factor and disregard the "noise".
farhmoha 1 year ago
I liked this speech but only 3 minutes? it could have lasted at least 7 or 8 minutes.
MrDeppness 1 year ago 2
now if this was some women telling us we need to embrace our inner child we would have 25min TED , this vid was too short .
sausage4mash 1 year ago 3
Interesting but much too short. He barely got the idea out.
Jeremias1111 1 year ago
I just love how people use the SPAM function to hide comments they disagree with.
atypicalguy 1 year ago 3
i havent seen this yet (still caching) but the title sounds like one of those horrible creationist arguments 'irreducible complexity' or some shit. lol : but my spider senses tell me tedtalks could not possibly stoop that low, so i will watch it in hopes that it isnt.
quosmo1 1 year ago
What happened to T of TED?
dearestkranthi 1 year ago
@dearestkranthi It's in the commercials.
AtheistdotEDU 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That really didn't give me any info. I feel like TED on youtube is slipping. It used to be there were always talks I'd be interested in. Not anymore. And many are very superficial and/or too short.
rhomeaforever 1 year ago
Comment removed
rhomeaforever 1 year ago
Summary: If something is complex, that means theres more information to work with, and you can get easier answers by just looking at the broad picture. Whereas, if you have less information, you need to really work with that information to get answers, and that would be complexity.
Or something.
midgetsow 1 year ago
Interesting topic, sadly he just didn't go anywhere with it...
Catend 1 year ago
@Catend
What? You serious?
sparrow111260 1 year ago
@sparrow111260
about which part?
Catend 1 year ago
@Catend
You said he didn't go anywhere with it.
I'm intrigued. Why would you say that?
He showed an exceptionally interesting chart and picker out some highly influential factors.
That looked like he "went somewhere" with it.
What specifically did you not like find wrong?
sparrow111260 1 year ago
@sparrow111260
It felt like the first chapter out of a book that's all. I'm not saying it's bad, I just want more I guess.
Catend 1 year ago
@Catend
Fair enough.
sparrow111260 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
zoom out, see a connection? Afghanistan, allege :Jon Stewart ! now that is complex
daffeybill 1 year ago
1:54 If you start with an answer, you wouldnt need a question...
DorkyD4v1d 1 year ago
I see far more advertising than anyone needs in a day which makes me feel sorry for anyone as they are probably everyone! E-fracking-nuff of the advertising ! People need jobs not some vision of what they cannot buy because they have no income. Mass mental depression serves no one. Get out of your office and into the real world. Go without clean clothes for a month and watch LIFE SUCKS for a better perspective. Prozac is not food.
Snowflake70 1 year ago
zoom out, see a connection Afghanistan allege Jon Stewart now that is complex
daffeybill 1 year ago
This was interesting. I like the idea of helping people see complex things don't have to be 'scary.' Just dive right in! :)
organicrobot 1 year ago
as regards to the ad: if she's such a hot shit photographer why is she using a blackberry camera? surly she can afford a proper camera.
rhcpconor 1 year ago
lets give the CRAZIES 5 min, and THIS GUY more time.
isambo400 1 year ago
TedTalks and Bullshit walks!
lexsite 1 year ago
holy shit! that's hot
KilluaXIII 1 year ago
Well, that was vague and unhelpful.
atthetopofmyvoice 1 year ago
Graph theory, interesting stuff.
freezingbeast 1 year ago
The subjective nature of what is complex and what is simple, stays the same. It is rather you that changes, due to your perspective. Complex things do not lead to simple, rather, there are more than one way of looking at a problem, and how you look at that problem. In political science, we call this a lens. It is used to look at a problem through certain frames of reference. The problems are neither complicated nor simple, rather they are problems. It is you that makes them one way or the other.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff in essence, do not fall for his toying around with the idea of complicated and simple, understand the world is not black and white, and can be interpreted in any way, if one is simply looking for an interpretation, or in other words an opinion of how complicated it really is.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
A blackberry is really not that complex.
tiefensucht 1 year ago
This is very true. Zoom out and simplify, or make it more abstract and simplify.
This is a technique that programmers use daily when creating a code architecture to work with.
Pianofy 1 year ago
What cannot be solved Can be Cut !
Gordian Knot
zigsauer 1 year ago
Very simplistic talk :P felt like a trailer for the actual talk
kid29a 1 year ago
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart was more informative.
saadasim 1 year ago
Would have loved more real life examples. Enjoyed the talk.
desemondez 1 year ago
I want the rest... what was that? :/
Vormav666 1 year ago 22
i liked the blackberry ad better!!
prabhatpalpal 1 year ago
um .. i didnt get it
sl2mmer 1 year ago
@sl2mmer It's simple, A baguette is complex... but a curry onion green olive poppy cheese bread is complicated.
DackIsBack 1 year ago
@DackIsBack Its all as you think you see it, and not how it "actually is". They are not, "complicated" or "simple" rather you see them as that way. A slice of bread is not morally good, but you can interpret it as good, depending on your perspective. He uses words, which their meaning is mostly just an opinion. Is the glass half full or empty?
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff I think you're playing off the curry onion green olive poppy cheese bread as an extraneous matter when it is of the utmost importance..
DackIsBack 1 year ago
@DackIsBack I'm sorry. its the green olives. I can't take them. There too salty.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
as well as taking time with your decisions to way all the angles, leads to more good decisions then rushing and only looking at one or two angles gets you many more poor choices
tausenti 1 year ago
Don't get me wrong, but doesn't simplicity naturally lead to complexity? This should be titled how to pick out simple answers from a complex problem.
Darkaero199 1 year ago
Misleading title - this was a lead in for a 2 minute Blackberry commercial.
SwimStretchRepeat 1 year ago 99
@SwimStretchRepeat
I'll complain when they put the commercial at the beginning.
kaminarigaston 1 year ago
Comment removed
Darkaero199 1 year ago
Lakes with fish have more mosquitoes? Why?
ORCA4312 1 year ago
...half of this was an ad...but worth it
comtraya101 1 year ago
@comtraya101 lol the thumbnail was for this vid was of the ad
xapemanx 1 year ago
Gotta love the 3min TED slots! This was great
jsskieracersoll 1 year ago
wow i was just getting in to it,... it was so short ;C
axxrulez 1 year ago
Where's the rest? This sounds like the first sentence of a 50 page paper.
DoJaenin 1 year ago
Uhhh Ok... So Yeahh.
batfly 1 year ago