Added: 5 years ago
From: soynoise
Views: 22,577
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (150)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How many man-children are there in this world? Without a state to protect our rights, we will fall into warlordism, or some form of strong-man rule. Despite the masturbatory fantasies of anarchist Utopians, the fact that our state has been expanding doesn't mean it will inexorably do so. It's being expanded by people who believe in the power of the state to fix the problems they are addressing with policy. Just elect leaders who believe in limited govt, and we can have it. No anarchy needed.

  • Anarchy isnt just 4 whites iam MEXICAN and i strongly belive in ot

  • anarchism is the future

  • do anarchists believe in cars?? i mean even there was a anarchy would you guys be ok without traffic regulations??? or let any idiot in the road?? or do anarchists wish to abolish cars??

  • @jesselakerr how about you check out some actual anarchist theory before spouting reactionary misconceptions.

  • If only there was a way to make it appeal to the masses, they all think we're geeks

  • We can only dream of a world where we have no greedy idiots claiming authority over us. Scared individuals cannot help but don a uniform, pick up a weapon and start enforcing their system upon others. The people in power will do anything to stop that power being taken away. All we want is freedom from others controlling our entire existence, Sadly we have to fight for it. Vive la revolution!

  • This is really hilarious, this is exactly why anarchism doesn't work... just read all the comments and see if anyone of you can agree! The answer is spiritual not political. Democracy is better than living under an evil dictator but do you think if we all did nothing in terms of government (anarchy as you put it) that no greedy slimeball would try to seize power? Read Samuel, Kings, Jeremiah get a clue

  • No offense, you may very well be a smart person, but you have absolutely no clue when it comes to anarchy. We don't want government, but we do want governance. We do not want chaos, we want organization. We have our ideas on how to stop "greedy slimeball(s)"

    Anarchism is a a very serious political and philosophical ideology. Our numbers are growing exponentially. We're here to stay. I'm not looking down upon you, or trying to talk smack. If you would like to have a rational discussion about

  • anarchism, I would be happy to share with you correct information. I'm not trying to sway you to anarchism, but it is important for non-anarchists to have an informed understanding of anarchy. You or anyone else can feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss this topic further. Have a good day.

  • Anarchy and democracy are not compatible.

    DEMOCRACY: Demo = common people, cracy = rule

    ANARCHY: An = without, archy= rule

    Democracy is for what anarchy is against.

  • Maybe you should learn about what those things really mean before making up your own definition like what you did. You are correct on democracy, but Anarchy = without RULERS. Anarchism is not against rules at all, that misconception was made up by the capitalist media. Anarchism is actually the most extreme form of democracy because it's two main organizational principles are DIRECT democracy and federalism. Anarchism has nothing to do with nihilism or chaos. Look up Anarcho-Syndicalism.

  • Anarchy means both, and 'without rulers' means precisely- NO rulers. Who the rulers are is irrelevant. Democracy requires rules & rulers and anarchy requires the absence thereof. Direct democracy is an 'extreme form of democracy,' anarchism is not. Anarchy rejects ALL external authority, and in that sense it is nihilistic (as well as undemocratic). Saying it's not is just an attempt to change it to appeal to the masses. Stop trying to make anarchy socially acceptable.

  • I'm digging the cardboard rice hats. Classy/.

  • *largely because of countries like the Soviet Union, Cuba, and China, he was very misunderstood.

    Even today, most of his original 'meaning' is all but lost to human understanding and knowledge.

  • Confrontare Malatesta a Chomsky è alquanto pittoresco e denota la classica disinformazione degli americani in merito alla profondità di interpretazione...(A)

  • Nel filmato si riassumono princípi fondamentali dell'anarchia e vengono nominati alcuni pensatori: non si raffrontano analisi da parte di Chomsky e Malatesta,quindi dire che gli americani sono disimformati é un giudizio superficiale. Di sicuro sono male informati o in mala fede quelli che definiscono l'anarchia come vandalismo, chaos o barbarie, perché la vera barbarie é quella del sistema.

  • Alright! Anarchy in LA! My hometown!

  • "anarchy ownz espescialy punkin around we are chaos"

    Anarchism is not chaos -- anarchism is organization via horizontal structures versus the exploitative, oppressive and capitalistic structures that bring death via war, hunger and disease.

    Anarchism is freedom.

    Viva libertad.

  • @KenCat1337 That is one version of anarchism. On the other hand, there are those of us who like capitalism just fine, only without a crony govt or rigged financial and monetary system. The voluntary relationships in pure capitalism cannot be exploitative by their very nature, not matter how many times man-children like yourself say it over and over again. I'm sorry, you having a hard time getting a job, and making it in the world somehow? Grow up!!!!

  • the world has to die for it to work,then back to the tribal ways of life,but than that did not work the first time ether

  • There are still so-called tribes practising lifestyles that utilized since Time Immemorial.-The >50%Black man(at Craigslist'Seattle's political section).Many so-called tribes were destroyed from without.

  • 0:47, trekkies.... :oP

  • that religous dude is retarded. he obviously never read the book of judges. thats why god had to keep saving their asses from their kings. and jesus came when rome was on their high horse.

  • We're not chaos. The state brings chaos. Please don't associate yourself with anarchy if you think it's the other way around! We have a hard enough time dealing with ignorance already.

  • Karl Marx, my friend:

    "The free development of each is condition for the free development of all."

    Do you know what this means?

  • Yea, it means you don't know what you're talking about....Karl Marx is the OPPOSITE of anarchism.

  • No, not completely..

  • Just almost completely.

  • Marx was anti-authoritarian. This is known through his works and people in his life. He was looking for a way that would LIBERATE people, not enslave them further.

    Union, China, Cuba, etc. He is very misunderstood.

  • But his way wasn't right. You can't liberate the people by force.

    I still argue that anarchy is the opposite of socialism. You have a giant mechanism compared to almost no mechanism or machine of the people.

    Maybe I'm wrong, that's just how I see it.

  • You're both wrong. Karl Marx is completely unrelated in terms of Anarchism. He wanted to liberate people from social class not from rule of government. Communism is more of an economic plan than a political party. Ther can be anarcho Communism or Oligarchal communism. Both have the potential to equally distribute common wealth. BTW, I think Anarchism is useless. It's just a way for people to commit crimes and forcibly remove other people from Their conformity.

  • see how that news guy keeps asking that guy with the bandana why hes wearing a mask well hes an asshole. Chjeck out my channel (A)

  • i like direct democracy but we do need govnt to keep stuff running

  • My yogic videos shot in my luxury city centre apartment will help anyone find fulfillment in these auspicious times we live in.

  • ....or no wage

  • This is a great video and I'm glad it shows some black and asian people too.

  • who is the righteous babe in the video clip? and for all the naysayers against anarchy - take a look at wikipedia, millions of people coming together to make something free of charge.

  • (I resume): anarchism is meant to be something spontaneous, relying on the so-called natural tendencies of man toward good and solidarity but it is bound to fail because many people think they need strong leaders as well as an orderly society in order to achieve happiness. However, anarchism is interesting because it questions our way of life and allows for opening new fields of reflection on where our world is going to. But most people can't tell right from wrong and have misguided reasonings.

  • u are progammed to believe you need to be lead. leaders only care about power. we need guides and not leaders.

  • "Give a person a fish;they are satiated for one day.Teach that person to fish;they are satiated indefinitely!"-The >50% Black man(I can be found at Craigslist/Seattle's politics section).

  • There is one strong paradox: an

  • the philosophy of authority rises from a sons subodinated to he father and it is the examle of the people subordination to government.But the sons are not always subordinated they grow up,evolute and dont need protector or authority anarchy is a philosophy of a evolution when men devepoed that much and understand he need no authority

  • more majority rule by force = more democratic rule. anarchy is simple, self righteous ideological well off people and their poor 'exploited friends' going to churches to get free food on fridays even though they all hate religion and everyone no like themselves. truly beautiful, love the red marxist outlook it is really what most anarchists are.

  • haha yeah He was, and i understanding respecting your authority and all that, but does it say that we actually NEED a structured government? i mean, to me, God is my only leader and the only one i need

  • the dude at 1:00 bothers me...I'm a Bible believer as well, but I'm also somewhat of an anarchist, and I don't know anywhere in the Bible that says we require government...I don't see what the scripture on his sign has to do with anything, and i believe that I only need one leader, and He is not of this earth.

  • Yes, i agree. It saddens me when i see fellow christians, deeply opposed to anarchist's beliefs. Most church "leaders" teach about confomity to the status quo, rather than, teaching about a self-sufficient life, free of rule and oppression. I think we need church leaders like Martin Luther King, and many other Ministers from the Civil Rights Movement.

  • amen, dude i totally agree

  • anarchy isn't a threat its a relieve

  • I don't quite get a lot of the criticisms of anarchy... people who can't even imagine it worry me. Have you never done anything without being forced to? Never given anything without demanding something in return? Never made a decision in a group without electing a leader to tell you what to do and how you know that you want to, because you elected em?

  • - the nightmarish world anarchists believe we live in, is only partially true. Yes there are problems, but I would rather live in a real world with some problems than in a fantasy world with none. I do not hate anarchists, because most have good intentions, but I pity them, because anarchy by its own definition cannot work. It is nothing more than a pleasant dream.

  • clowns

  • dstryn is a pussy and is the type of person that i think is the worst kind of anarchy

    he would do nothing to help other anarchiest!

  • up with anarchy fuck all the haters especialy you-culve-all i want to do is fuck up the world and spray paint till i die!

  • Culave anarchy will work ur just an asshole u don't believe if u don't like anarchy why the hell did u search it on youtube

  • ryan19554- usually I try to avoid resorting to insult matches, but that comment was so pathetic I cant resist. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. In a world of 6.6 billion anarchy will never work- id like to see you explain how it can. To anyone that believes in reason, that is obvious.

  • Both CULAVE and the rest have valid points the general public have not yet reached a point where they can give up there republic and embrace individualism. without corporations and politicians the masses would be lost. People who can lead themselves would be fine but that group of people is very small. However flawed anarchism maybe, it is less so than a wide bodied governed democracy/republic and to do nothing about that would be a shame.

  • Another Communist from NY says Anarchy is superior to the fucking rule in America today!

  • Greetings from a comrade from Madrid, currently living in LA.

    Capitalism is the institucionalization of violence and chaos.

    Class Qar

    Another world is possible.

  • Mosafaka- Lets agree to disagree. We could continue this for ages and not resolve anything. I wish you luck with your anarchist way of life. I am a sceptic. If I become an anarchist I will have a very good reason but I cant see it ever happening.

  • Mosafaka- to continue what I was saying, the fact of the matter is that you seem to be the sort of anarchist who chooses to live through a mixture of hatred and a believe in a utopia which will never exist. That is more insane than any political system. By the way, your comment about me and sexism was meaningless rubbish which you have no ground for- go and burn a car you fucking idiot.

  • i just compared one sensless statement with another if youre not able to discuss im sorry, ah and please tell me where your car is.

  • Anarchism isn't about democracy or direct democrcy, its against democracy because democracy is just another way of domination. its about living together and find solutions everyone can live with.

  • You must be miserable- because everthing you see, you oppose. I pity you.

  • I oppose everything? if war explotation and murder is everything for you, your right. I'm for freedom i am for respect i am for life i am for self organisation and so on. i cant see what's your point.

  • Just because I am against anarchy doesnt mean I support war, exploitation and murder- I hate them as much as you, but I cannot see the purpose of anarchy. Since the dawn of humanity (whenever that was) people have required a structured system. Anarchy is anti-structure by its nature so it will never achieve anything.

  • thats your problem. you don't understand the different between being against domination and being against structure. for sure there must be a structure but I want to live in a structure without murder war exploitation. and I think that anrchy is a idea we should honestly think about. if you hate exploitation etc. you can't live without rebelling against the system we're living in because it is violent!

  • I will make this my last comment because a)we could go on and on... and b) we should let other users have their say

    I do understand the difference between being against domination and being against structure. But my point is anarchy by its own definition cannot work. I agree the ideas are good. My problem is the practise. You claim to oppose these terrible things but what, as an anarchist do you propose to put in their place, and more importantly how?

  • man you suck ass from a straw, hes trying to make you understand stuff and you just keep on saying really stupid things man

  • to TheWorstRock, I say stupid things? You sound really intelligent by your petit little opening remark. You are pissed because you know deep down anarchy will never work, and if you don't, you're the idiot.

  • And another point- By its very definition, in an anarchist society people would not be able to protect each other, because that would constitute forming a system of governance. Talk of liberty is fine but liberty IS finite. It looses moral credibility when people use it to hurt others- that is innevitably what would happen in an anarchist society.

  • Anarchy also had its part to play in starting WW1. Thats a sobering reflection on the emptiness of anarchist actions and aims.

  • haha best joke i've ever heard! really! ever heard about imperialism? colonism?? nationalism? patriotism?

    and in the next post we'll read: sexism is the women's fault??

  • Mosafaka- You have completely misunderstood what I was saying; I WAS NOT defending any political ideology and certainly none of the above, but you have obviously directly ignored my criticism of anarchism. You have also ignored my other comments. Why dont you just admit that most anarchists; fundamentally oppose EVERYTHING. In the real world WHERE PROBLEMS ARE A FACT OF LIFE most people understand that there is no plausible alternative to a structured society.

  • Shawkins49- I am in complete agreement with you. I am trying to be open minded with as many views as possible and I have had anarchist friends. But I cannot agree with their standing. Yes democracy is far from perfect but it has been proven to be the most successful ideology. Twentieth Century Communism failed miserably and killed millions. An example of an anarchist state is Somalia. Anarchists seem to ultimately aim for a utopia- in a world of 6.7 billion that is, impossible.

  • well what you call communism may failed and killed millions, but your democratic system which is just a part of the capitalistic system is still killing people all over the world, if it is a soldier in iraq a child in somalia or a so called gangster in the streets of compton or what ever. humans are dyimg day by day.

  • And you believe anarchy is faultless? The difference between anarchists and democrats (not the party, the wider term)is that democrats admit their weaknesses. If you truly believe in doing anything about the above problems, then why dont you do something useful about it instead of opposing everything. Once again you have avoided the points I was making. Somalia=Anarchy.

  • oh sorry i forgot somalia. mh i guess somalia isn't near to anarchism, anarchisma means no leaders... no leaders even means no warloards. and only the fact that there isn't a government doesn't mean that it is anarchy.

  • Anarchy and communisim all sound like gum drops and rainbow smiles on paper but it never works out. throughout history stalinism, maoism, leninism, marxism etc have all tried and failed. the only reason anarcists can even voice their opinion is because of democracy.

  • Interesting that the one guy telling people to read the Bible would say what he says. After reading "Jesus of Nazareth Illegal Tax Protester", I'm convinced that while it might be a stretch to say Jesus was an anarchist, but he has nothing but contempt for human government. That guy's position seems just like many others who haven't a clue of what Jesus says. A misunderstanding if you will.

  • anarchy for life

  • "killing for a sport" thats berzerk, human nature isnt to kill eachother...

  • When law becomes injustice, resistance becomes a duty!

  • WOOOOO!!!!!

    us leaderless jerks are better than you rpublican bastards.

    help change the U.S. to a direct democracy.

  • shout out from the northern armed deconstruction of faschists or NADF

  • This gives great insite into Anarchy as a whole. The big misconception about it is that it is completely unorganized. I see it as groups of people continuing to perform their services suited to their lifestyles, without negative influence from a higher authority. Good stuff though.

  • Directed to the Christian government sluts in the video:

    You don't need any other boss besides God.

  • Greetings from Turkish Anarchists by the way, Comrades !!!

  • You Faschist sons of bitches may need leaders; but we DON'T !!!

  • You guys are sooo right. If there were no laws I would kill EVERYONE! Thats a good insight into humanj nature....

  • Ever here of Anarchist Law? Anarchism is a highly organized structured political philosophy.

  • Thats your own nature not human nature, and if you did that the community would kill you.

  • all anarchists are ignorant retards because they think that the government is the problem when really the problem is people(anarchists)who only wag their fingers at the government instead of coming together to impeach our corrupt leader(bush). note:A society without a leader WILL FALL NO MATTER WHAT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS! have a nice day.

  • In Spain during the Spanish Civil War, Anarchists made a society of mutal aid and consensus, and today the Zapatias in Chipas, Mexico in the forest have a generally anarchist society. And your saying a society without a leader will fail, read some stuff on human nature and anarchism.

  • Your example of the Mexican semi-Anarquist experiment in Mexico is not the best one. The only reason why the mexican Army controlled by the capitalist Mexican autocrats have not slaugtered them yet is the rise of new more dangerous enemies to the Mexican State. A new group engaging in sabotage and violence by the out of control drug cartels is tying up the politically weak Mexican central government.

  • But now way from 1994 to now there well trained with other guerrilla groups and Anarcho-punk have teamed up also there support from Worldwide Anarchists, Activists, Communist Parties ect... What cartels do you speck of?

  • Sorry, it was a typo error. It was supposed to refer the the drug cartels which the Mexican Government cannot control anymore in a separated mention. The original Leftist Guerrilla groups in Mexico have settled down for a political struggle and now a more violent new group is taking the fight to the corrupt Mexican Government using sabotage. They were distintions meaned to be separated from the rest of the statement.

  • Yeah but thats not gonna stop the people from organizing still.

  • I'll second that sockembopers12. Anarchy is nothing but a childish little dream.

  • if u dont belive why did u search it u dick its bout a community working together with out giving power to one or more authority figures bc with that comes great greed and can cause much death its bout freedom so fuck u culave

  • if you want to insult me rokdude667, then at least write it to make sense. There is nothing any anarchist can write to convince me that anarchy works. IT NEVER WILL. As for looking at this video, I think it says something about anarchy that you cannot handle criticism. Maybe its because one day you will agree with me.

  • IT NEVER WILL.

    And now is when i say FUCK YOU. Because IT HAS BEEN.

    Do you know who the fuck was Buenaventura Durruti?

    A spanish anarchist from the Social Revolution of 1936 in spain. He made the "Columna Durruti" and instaurated the Anarchocomunism.

    Franco started a war to stop him, in the same year. And sadly, he did it...

    What's a utopic person? A dreamer, who could be a hero. A hero, what you will never be.

    A new world is possible, a new capitalism: no.

  • carlmn- ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,­ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,­ha,ha. HA!

    You are so full of shit in your little fantasy world, im not even going to try rationally debating you. Enjoy life!

  • Thats what im trying, to enjoy the life. But, at the same time, im trying to everybody to can enjoy life too. Because there are children in Afric and all over that you call "3rd world" which, since they are born, they are predestined to be starving.

    Because, with bad luck, everybody could be a Homeless "tomorrow" in this, the "1st world"...

    You answered to my DATA with... that shit.

    The utopia could be tomorrow! Lets fight for it!

  • One more thing:

    If you fight, you could win. If you dont fight, YOU ARE LOST.

    Liberty and Equaliti!

  • carlmn

    This is the last comment I will write for this video. My position on anarchy is this; I think the intention (the intended conclusion) sounds great, but it is incredibly unrealistic because 6.6 billion people will simply never be united. Anytime that has been attempted, it has ended in bloodshed. Yes, a governing system of any ideology will have many faults, but that is human nature- this is the problem with anarchy- it ignores the FACT that human society requires a structure,continued...

  • :( You know a little bit of anarchy.

    You think theres no structure, neither socioeconomic model... when there is (horizontal)

    Its not about to be united. It is about solidarity. It is about liberty, equality, and respect. It is about learn of the past.

    If it has always ended in bloodshed, that was because of the Hate of the other people. Hate promoted by Avarice of capitalist and fascist ones.

    Bye. (this is my last message too)

  • all that being said, i do wish that anarchism could exist, and i feel that another civil war in america is most likely going to happen someday between the different social classes, and if it were completely possible to exist peacefully together without structure i hope for the best

  • youll get your way more nowadays if you fucking fight not make it a silence protest

  • a lot of anarchists today are idiots

  • How so, it seems like you are naive and really don't know what your talking about.

  • anarchism in the sense of no government at all could not exist- people would start killing eachother for sport... but anarchism in the sense that we have a VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY small government and the only laws that exist are against murder, rape, theft, or any version of those crimes AND we would leave every other country alone (they can solve their own fucking problems) would be the most ideal society there could be.

  • ...even though that wouldnt really be anarchism.

  • No, a smaller government is fascism. The smaller a government is the more power it possess. A government that is directly controlled by the people is true democracy.

  • a smaller government that let everyone in the country vote on all laws and regulations instead of "representing" us would not be facist. im talking about a small group of people who get paid to take orders and follow out policies from the citizens- direct democracy. as you probably know, the US "representitive democracy" is far from what a real democracy is.

  • I would much rather have a society in which everybody was "the government", or at least that a lot of people could be so it would be more difficult to acheive domination. The American government becoming smaller (of less people) then they would have more power and be more opressive.

  • How the fuck did you come to that inane conclusion? Killing for sport? Is the state the only thing stopping you from killing people? If so you should really get some help for that. Anarchists don't believe in absolute freedom. They believe in freedom until the point where you infringe on someone else's freedom. If there is a serial killing in an anarchist society they will no go unpunished.

  • if there is no structure there are no rules. people will do whatever the fuck they want. anarchism in the true sense IS absolute freedom, if you take charge and punish someone for what they have done that is putting yourself in a position of athority, and that will surley leed to people revolting against (and probably killing) you.

  • That's your fundamental flaw with anarchism. It is not about no structure and no rules. Anarchism means literally "without rulers". That is the most basic concept but it is much more than that. Anarchists believe in structure and order just without a centralized ruler. The structure and rules are decided in a democratic way by all that are affected by them.

  • and yes, the only thing stopping millions of people from killing people they want to is the law. if there was no punishment for it, there would be little hesitence. i know anarchy has succesfully existed in other countries before, but i dont think it could exist in moderen day america. we already have the most murders by firearm in the world, if wasnt illegal think how many more would kill.

  • Ok so if fear of punishment is stopping millions now wouldn't those millions be stopped by fear of punishment in an anarchist society also? The means of punishment will be decided by the community democratically. You seem to think anarchism means nihilism. It doesn't. By the way you are wrong about the only thing stopping people from killing. That is absurd.

  • Yes the US has the most gun killings but you need to look beyond that and ask why. Most crimes are committed out of disparities of wealth and class. Those crimes are a symptom of the horrible system we live under. This would not be the case in an anarchist society because there would be no money. Why would my comrade steal from the society what the society already gives him for free?

  • one reason why people get violent is because there needs arent being met. when one needs money thet will steal or evan kill for it. We live in a nation were 84% of the wealth belongs to 7% of the poeple. while people are starving there are rich bastards out there spending hundreds one wine and cigars. its chaos. the meaning of chaos is disorder well dont u agree we alread live in disorder? people dying of starvation while others are filthy rich. sounds like disorder to me.

  • I hate when you call it Anarchism because that contradicts itself.

  • How is that? Anarchism is a political train of thought that wants to get rid of the state and to replace it with a decentralized federation of communities where the inhabitants of that community controls their community directly. All communities would be autonomous abd each community would make decisions together. It is highly organized and there is much order just we aren't going to be ordered by a dictator.

  • I see your point, man. But how about "fuck the leeches of society?" Thats the way I see it. There are millions of useless dying old farts out there sapping the majority of our resources without ever planning on giving back to society. Most of them are white. Black leeches are no worse than the rest.

  • funny americans..

  • im an anarchist.

    But i am quite sceptic that it will work...

    Because people has evolved too much.

    We can not take care of our self.

    We allways look for somebody else too take

    care of the problems for uss.

    People now a day are too much depending on bosses.

    They cannot take care of them self.

  • you're exactly right

  • (stummen)

  • hey stummen.

    have you ever informed yourself about spain 1936?

    anarchy worked there just fine, until franco and stalin interfered

  • I tried to read something about it but i was too tired and it was not enough information there so i gave up... But in 1936 people were more independent so i think it worked out pretty well.

    But we still have Cuba, China and Vietnam.

    Communism is the sequal of anarchism...

  • Nope. Communism has central government. Communism doesn't necessarily look for mutual aid.

  • my butts an anarchist

  • LOL... mine is too.

  • joys of anarchism, destruction of the system yeah !!

  • Well Done Comrades!

  • this is good

  • ...rest of video?

  • two words....kick ass

  • hell yes

    :)

    peAce, love, And AnArchy

  • right on

  • right on", that's the phrase, to the fucked up stupid things you say, we say: "right on! right on! right on! right on...! anti flag !!!

  • anti flag??? that doesnt mean anti the american flag?? does it??

    WWWRIGHT ONNNNN

    right on, right on..

  • Punk rock? Isn't that the kind of music where kids cut each other with razorblades and knives? Wow, I haven't heard that song for so long. I've lost a lot of respect for anti-flag over the last few years. Oh well.

  • Freedom for the World !!!

    from Germany !

    ENJOY SPAIN 36! SYNDIKAT!!!

  • http://revolutionaryinthemind.­blogspot.com/

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more