Added: 4 years ago
From: 911stealth
Views: 7,366
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Almost 10 years but most people still asleep... Sad!!

  • this was Mr Gross from the 911 OMISSION REPORT!..

  • @camalusthegodofwar

    Get current. Thermate and thermite are not " super secret" - they are common industrial tools. US Army and private companies have plenty of experience using these high temp cutting tools. Why is there so much deliberate ignorance on the part of some of you ? This event is literally riddled with serious deceit and denial - this was a crime scene, and a high crime against America, but it has been shrouded and distorted. There are liars all over this, and many fools.

  • This is just the type of "false proof" that want to hyde real flaw in the NIST report. If someone with common sense lesson the comment he will think is that the thruther fact? so its b..l s..t and will be right.

    but if we studie WTC7 first then we are obviously confronted to a Very improbable phenomenon. A free fall of the building for 2.4 sec with no planes and an office fire that never stay more than 30 minutes on the same place. An engineer that read the NIST report will be stunned

  • The big Oil corporations are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.

    We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.

    Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!

  • Did anyone mention that NASA debunked their own IR photos? The Nasa rep said without corrobration from onsite measurement, they could NOT confirm any orbital measurement. Did you mention that? LOL Did you ever solve how this LIQUID metal was supposed to be contained against VERTICAL surfaces, like core columns? Because that container would have to be tougher than the core column, then disappear from the debris pile like the Cheshire Cat. Big Fail.
  • You people got no lives. Listening to this 911 babble one got to admit that Osama has been right all along: the west IS degenerated.

    

  • hey fuckers do way with that stupid music okay?

    it 'd be much better!

  • Even though they later found out that the steel weakened and pulled the outside in, instead of a breaking point.

  • I am not a fan of the nuke idea, but never say never. There were much smaller nukes including ones small enough to be fire from a howitzer. That was also decades ago. Technology has advance great sense then. Other elements can also be used to greatly reduce the radiation field left behind. So again never say never we know explosives were used and we know one was nano thermite but without a complete "real" investigation we will not know what all was used.

  • they think a nuclear bomb caused that? are they fucking stupid, look at a video of hiroshima, then ask that fucking question again. your talking about a force equal to 12,500 tons of TNT that equates to roughly 25 million pounds of explosives put that in the basement of the world trade center and your gona get a huge fucking crater and destroy all of manhattan. stop being stupid.

  • yeah he knows nothing about it.....just enough to cover it up by saying, I was there and saw nothing.....I hope he dies of cancer

  • PANCAKE SPECIAL

  • All this proves is that you are a dildo.

  • Where did all that heat come from? If the surface temps were 1300 degrees one can only image how how it was 6 floors down in the basement where folks were seeing steel running like lava. That had to be at least 3000+ degrees. Open air fire with perfect fuel and conditions burns at 1800 degrees F. I know where the heat came from. It is undeniably from a chemical reaction of thermite.

  • NIST isn't in denial, they know what they are doing. They are covering this up. NIST has a whole team of thermite experts on the 911 panel for a reason. So they know what NOT to look for. You can't find what your not looking for and they know full well thermite and other exotic explosives were used to assist in bringing those towers down. NIST admits in its report it never even looked for evidence of explosives.

  • Try this on You-Tube: Dr. Judy Wood-The New Hiroshima-Part 2A/2B. I admit at first glance it appears to be good science fiction, but almost all science fiction stories eventually become science fact, don't they. Keep an open mind and give it a watch. I dare you.

  • That must be a class he took at Duke right? Pittfalls of the brain 101. All these people suffered from mass hysteria at different times right? (Thats the other class he took)

  • Can you say pseudo science? Can you say people seeing what they want to see. I see people stringing patterns together and claiming them to be truth. I suggest you all take a class on the pitfalls of the brain. You string all these unlikely events together to fit your theory and call it truth. Idiots...

  • Look at the way everything is being thrust outward when the building falls. Most of the debris is going over the side, so how did the whole building fall apart all the way to the ground? I could see if it tipped over or something but this doesn't make sense. There had to be cuts in the main beams all the way down for the building to fall like that. And it's kind of odd that all three buildings fell the same way. I just don't buy it.

  • Google WTCHighTemp2.pdf

    Evidence of molten iron and molybdenum in WTC dust, molybdenum melts at over 4700F. Also aluminum and potassium and manganese were found in the samples. Potassium permanganate is used to ignite thermite. Alumninum is also used in the reaction.

  • oh it gets even dumber. Ground zero bears all the hallmarks of a Nuclear event.

    Well except the by product of a nuclear event like radiation. How does this stange little man know there is no radiation there.

    Simple I worked at Ground Zero for three months...I have been tested by the Military for many things...guess what no exposure to radiation noted here. Hey just had a kid he's fine so I'm not sterile heck there goes another "hallmark of a nuclear event"

  • Nuclear? -It wouldnt' have to be nuclear to produce molten metal. Thermite produces molten metat. Thermite is used in the demolition industry.

  • I was surprised to hear that too! It was a very amateur thing to say. It was also irresponsible in this case, because the idiotic public will fail to see the exaggeration and believe it.

    I remember someone on CNN saying something about sales. The reporter said "they are selling literally faster than the speed of light."

    I can accept exaggerations from people, but the word "literally" turned it into a bad joke. Literally? Come on...

    People say stupid things. It's irritating, lol.

  • if this stuff is steele melted together why am I looking at steele rebar sticking out of it?

    Let me ask this agin as I know some of you are a little dense.

    How am I looking at steele rebar sticking out of a lump of crap if the fire was hot enough to melt and fuse steele?

    Anyone getting this question?

    HOW AM I LOOKING AT STEELE REBAR STICKING OUT OF A LUMP OF WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE MELTED STEELE?

    ok send me hate mail and psuedo science.

  • Actually, I agree. Nuclear? How come this is the first anyone anywhere has mentioned this? None of the speakers even in this very video mention nuclear activity.

    Thermate.

  • A carbon based fire COULD NOT in any possible scenario MELT STRUCTURAL STEEL and anyone that says that it could is a LIAR and an enemy of the U.S. CONSTITUTION.

    Check out Sen. Joe LIEberman saying when asked about WTC7 said...

    " I haven't seen any evidence that, that occured."

    If these guys will lie this blatantly; you know that they will stop at nothing; and are capable of anything!

    VETERANS!

    Prepare to honor your oath!

    Do your DUTY!

  • google : A f f J H u t c h i s o n 4 . p d f

  • Now you have to be quick,before that madman really starts that illegal war,Thousands of people will die..Take your country back at all costs

  • arrrrrrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhh i am so angry not a single mention of this from the major media outlets,the corporations that own them dont want you to know the truth ! wake up please these criminals are still amongst you planning the next war with Iran

  • Evidence of thermite/thermate - steel cutter charges, great post by the way.

  • Looks like a pressure cooker left on for months.

    Without any release of pressure, it maintains a very high level of heat and remains burning for a long period of time until the pressure is released.

    Explosives do not generate such high heat and then stay hot like the person claimed in the video.

    He obviously has no experience or training in explosives.

  • No, you dont, do some research on Thermite you fool

  • When the fire fighters were in the rescue mode, they were pulling large chunks of concrete from the pile.

    So, how does your claim that all the concrete was "pulverized"?

    Jones found the elements of thermite which happened to equal common building materials.

  • WTF is a large chunk, really,compared to the entire building? In general it was pulverized...

  • i've never seen anything like this **wow***

  • Welcome to reality. It's not easy living here, but we're a friendly group ;)

  • Geez why didn't I think of it logically!? Now I see the error of my ways. Science doesn't matter - you just need to `think logically` - brilliant. Moron. Are you a physicist? What are you qualified in? What is your day job? It must be wonderful to be as knowledgable as you merely by `thinking logically`...

  • what if you thought logically and came to realize that the steel didn't melt because of explosives, but by the sheer weight of the building collapsing and compressing and producing phenominal amounts of friction?? i don't mean to insult you but it just gets easier and easier to debunk these theories

  • @Markmosso As easy as you posting any other collapse melting the iron and pulverizing all the concrete. Somebody wrote that the first responders are living witnesses in their lungs of some of the materials used to bring down those towers. The most modern destructive technologies only known to the perpetrators. Check: "Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) Found in 9/11 Lungs and Dust of WTC Responders".

  • @Markmosso

    How stupid is your statement! So by this logic every large steel framed building is resting on steel melted by the weight of the building pressing down on its foundations!!!! Even if it is not melted it should still be hot so it could be used as a source of energy to help run the building. Who needs oil when we can just harness the weight of our buildings!

  • Witnesses to molten metal: cooperativeresearch [dot] org / context.jsp ? item = a091201moltenmetal#a091201molt­enmetal

  • The meteor segment is SO STUPID. Paper would not exist any more after it passed 800 F. There is still carpetting in that thing. This is not rocket science.

  • Given the fact that the most advanced and secretive energy weapons were used on 9/11 by Pentagon and "intelligence" perps under the orders of Cheney, Rumsfeld and dupe Bush, carbonized - petrified paper was found. Kid, paper on 9/11 didn't behaved as in your kitchen.

    Please read the "about" or find it with your browser:

    Preserving The WTC Wreckage

    A Visit to Hangar 17

    by Beth Fertig

    "GARGANO: ...There are... blackened pieces of paper carbonized by the heat. It smells like charcoal."

  • @911stealth So basically you theory hinges on the government having super secret thermite technology and have no basis to prove this is true? Okay, my neighbor has an unicorn in his garage. I've never seen and neither has anyone and he denies its existence but that's just all the proof I need right? Free the unicorns damnit!

  • It is important to realize that NASA provided faked images.

    They showed 911 with no clouds up and down the eastern seaboard.

    They showed the smoke plume going to different directions.

    Not much you can trust.

  • The meteorites result of the molten iron are visible evidence of the high temperatures due to the most advanced technology used to demolish those WTC towers. To that NASA and the Geological Survey provide confirming witness.

  • @911stealth

    Actually, NASA's AVIRIS infrared scans of the WTC Plaza done on Sept 16, and Sept 21,

    prove NOWHERE on the WTC plaza exceeded more than 850 C extrapolated back to

    Sept 12, the day after the attacks.

    WTC, WTC HOT SPOTS NEVER GOT OVER 800 C

    pubs. usgs. gov/of/ 2001/ofr-01-0429/ thermal. r09. html

  • Well it's not really a denial. NIST isn't legally obligated to offer an explanation for (or modify it's hypothesis to include) evidence it has chosen to ignore. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution, not the defense in the legal system, and that explains everything we've seen from the official accounts. It's also why debunking 9/11 "conspiracies" is logically simple. A legal opportunity is needed, to make an accusation and the hearing of evidence that supports that accusation.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more