Watching the training rounds, you get an idea for what artillery was like before exploding shells were developed. A nice little taste of the 18th century :P
Great vid, I never got the chance to work in an M1.I was going out in 1987 as they were coming in.
This is not a rip ,but I don't recall missing so many targets.
One of the fears the Soviets had of the US Army, was our efficiency with munitions. When we fired, we killed. There is not much, more manly than manning a battle tank. I highly recommend it.
haha .. I remember that gunnery . ( B CO 1-35 66D Hooahh Blackjack, btw alfa co we saw your fugging on the gunnery score cards no way you got top company and plt gunnery ). Ahh the memories. .. .replaced my GPS 3 times that rotation in 2 days. Among other gremlins in the turret
The projectiles don't blow up because they're not explosive. HEAT training rounds (TP-T) are filled with concrete. Sabot training rounds are steel coated tungsten. Also, training rounds are not APFSDS, they are TPCSDS-T: Target Practice Cone Stabilized Discarding Sabot - Tracer.
The M865 TPCSDS-T training round actually has a higher muzzle velocity (1,700 m/s) than the newest sabot (M829A3 - 1,550 m/s). So, definitely not low velocity.
Was with Bravo 2/72AR ..."DEUCE TANK!" from June 1995-June 1996. I pretty much lived on Rodriguez Range and loved every min of it. Meet you at Fiddlers Green when its all over Troop.
well thats cool that your a gunner in the swiss army, but in the US army for tank gunnery we dont shoot actual tanks down range. they are plywood targets in the shape of a tank on a small rail track to move them back and forth. the rounds are training rounds.
the reason there is no penetration is because the ammo they are using is training munitions not sabot or heat. THE AMMO's job is not to penatrate hardend targets but to show the accuracy of the tanks firing controls with the gunner and commander.
Almost every shot is a hit. Projectiles pierce dummy silhouettes so effortlessly that you don't see any effect on the target other than a hole which can't be seen on this low quality, low resolution video
nice video love how ya got the recieveing end of the rounds, I was in old 1/63 in vilseck back in the day. Seen alot of Graf & Hohenfels too. Good shit bro.
there ply wood targets. the round just punches thrugh like paper. The target then gose down after a hit. The dirt kick up is behind the target. These were all solid hits.
yea i was with C 1-35 but i left in summer 07. Good ole baumholder lol!! yea did 2 gunnerys up in graph!! now im sittin here at knox wishin i was back in germany!!
LAST GRAF!! This ALMOST makes me miss the old days commanding an m1 a-nothing! They were so new then my tank's data plate said Xm-1! Neat vid. URRAHH!
I was in A 1/35 armor in baumholder Germany and remember many times going to gunnery. Had my head under a Humvee once when the range went hot and heard the first round go down range for the morning and smacked my head on the exhaust.
What's the name of that music? Been to Graf way back in the M60A1 and A3 days--early 80s. Also have been to Wild Chicken (Wildflecken) and Bergen Hohne.
army or marines? just curious cus i want to join the marines, but i want to be a tanker and the army has the M1a2, but i really want to be a marine...help!
first of all, what qualifies you to say Israeli tank crews are better? Secondly, the Leopard is claimed to be "better" than the M1 because it is more fuel efficient and cheaper to produce. The M1 would kill it in the field though
Excume me sir...but everybody knows that Leopard2A6 is better armored and more expensive...and they both use the same 120mm gun that of course IS GERMAN!
So what qualifications do you have to say one or the other is better?
In a test conducted by the swedish army, the Leo 2 won over M1, Leclrec, T-80 and Challenger. They choose the overall best tank. It is a fact.
BUT, comparing western tanks and saying which is best is for idiots, becasue they are more or less indentical, same gun (German Rehinmetal), same armor (UK Chobham)... Yes, M1 has DU armor, but that can be put on any tank.
I think the American crew is better cause they get more training, since they could be wasting $4.35 million if the crew doesn't get sufficient amount of training. And the Abrams can stand multiple RPG hits.
US and UK tank crews are the most combat hardend on earth. the tanks they drive are the most combat tested, and the M1 has killed all other tanks in war games.
The Leopard 2 has a better drive train with the low IR diesel engine but has inferior protection when compared with the Abrams. US tank units have better IT/COM capability than anyone in the world.
It isn't just the tank, but the crew. The US Army has the best trained tank crews in the world. I'd bet on them against any other armored formation from anywhere.
No way M1 Abrams is the best. And till the leopard won't prove itself better (maybe against an Abrams) then the M1 will be the best tank built ever. The only disadvantage of Abrams that it's expensive and it eats a lot...
Watching the training rounds, you get an idea for what artillery was like before exploding shells were developed. A nice little taste of the 18th century :P
wasteofspace1234 1 month ago
So, they can shoot. I can train a chimp to shoot Tank Table VIII.
How good are they at drinking?
Waltham1892 2 months ago
No they're not missing. the sabot training rounds go through the plywood targets like its paper so it looks like they're missing.
pball4life96 2 months ago
i'm confused. did they miss more then 1/2 of their shots? that can't be right.......
val28l 3 months ago
@val28l i can see what you are talking about but not they dont it just looks like they so :P
Dont forget they are shoot at plywood targets.
source, im a tanker
wowgamer14 2 months ago
very good video..
xiso 5 months ago
watching this brings back so many memories...the last time I was on that range we scored 912 back in '92. damn I miss that shit!
356slick 6 months ago
are these real rounds ?
masterco93 10 months ago
Going to my first gunnery in may as a loader. Gonna earn them boots
volc89 11 months ago
BFBC2 -> m1 better visibility than t90 = m1 better tank
Stuntpiloot05 1 year ago
I miss Graf. Been to that training area many times. 3rd Bn 35th Armor with both M-60A3's and M1A1's.
18dmedic 1 year ago
TARGET! Yeah! That's how tankers RAWK!!! Thanks for posting.
frequentfiler 1 year ago 2
on of the most overated tank
ukrainesuperpower87 1 year ago
@ukrainesuperpower87 Is that what your leaders tell you?
motoballz 1 year ago
@ukrainesuperpower87
Not overated.
The M1A2 Abrams is the best tank in the world.
ResiusOnline 1 year ago
@ukrainesuperpower87 no, its one* of the best if not the best tanks on the battlefield currently.
BloodyAbyss1216 9 months ago
@ukrainesuperpower87 It's highly rated because it has performed so well in COMBAT, you know, where it fucking counts.
Redmanfms 9 months ago
@Redmanfms against arabs?
val28l 3 months ago
1:16 = best clip ever.
freereloader1010 1 year ago
Well done
firebob66 1 year ago
the most poweful vehicle on earth. Isn't she beautiful?!
chazkm 2 years ago
How far can the Abrams shoot effectively? 1,2,3, miles?
1CME90 2 years ago
Great vid, I never got the chance to work in an M1.I was going out in 1987 as they were coming in.
This is not a rip ,but I don't recall missing so many targets.
One of the fears the Soviets had of the US Army, was our efficiency with munitions. When we fired, we killed. There is not much, more manly than manning a battle tank. I highly recommend it.
hamace 2 years ago
haha .. I remember that gunnery . ( B CO 1-35 66D Hooahh Blackjack, btw alfa co we saw your fugging on the gunnery score cards no way you got top company and plt gunnery ). Ahh the memories. .. .replaced my GPS 3 times that rotation in 2 days. Among other gremlins in the turret
Ibreakthings51 2 years ago
always missing....
goodeveningelf 2 years ago
I didn't see any...idiot.
CaptainAmerica322 2 years ago
nice shooting
hinatatsunare 2 years ago
i want 2 be a tanker so bad wicked vid =) 5/5.
82ndarmy 2 years ago
The projectiles don't blow up because they're not explosive. HEAT training rounds (TP-T) are filled with concrete. Sabot training rounds are steel coated tungsten. Also, training rounds are not APFSDS, they are TPCSDS-T: Target Practice Cone Stabilized Discarding Sabot - Tracer.
The M865 TPCSDS-T training round actually has a higher muzzle velocity (1,700 m/s) than the newest sabot (M829A3 - 1,550 m/s). So, definitely not low velocity.
Enrage13 2 years ago 6
guter schütze :))))
sollte mal mit APFSDS ballern lernen
GERtrasher 2 years ago
ahh its the plywoodians as my CO would say!! lol Dang i love the vid remins me of my time in Korea at Rod Range!!
stetzpilot 2 years ago 4
Was with Bravo 2/72AR ..."DEUCE TANK!" from June 1995-June 1996. I pretty much lived on Rodriguez Range and loved every min of it. Meet you at Fiddlers Green when its all over Troop.
sboo001 2 years ago
damn I aint heard that in a long time . .. thanks for the memory.
B Co 1-35 AR ( now 4-70th AR )
Ibreakthings51 2 years ago
love the M1s
Duc1198YamR1 2 years ago
the rounds go through the targets without exploding because they're using armor piercing rounds there and yes they are using low velocity rounds.
luger87, gunner leo2 from swiss army
luger87 2 years ago
well thats cool that your a gunner in the swiss army, but in the US army for tank gunnery we dont shoot actual tanks down range. they are plywood targets in the shape of a tank on a small rail track to move them back and forth. the rounds are training rounds.
deathfromabove2250 2 years ago
umm they arent exploding because there tracer rounds..............
TITANFTWx2 2 years ago
Surely they aren't shooting APFSDS? The projectile looks like it has low velocity.
Jacnas 2 years ago
the reason there is no penetration is because the ammo they are using is training munitions not sabot or heat. THE AMMO's job is not to penatrate hardend targets but to show the accuracy of the tanks firing controls with the gunner and commander.
thunder393 2 years ago
they are hiting it, look more closely, its not a real tank, its going trough it. like shoting at a paper target with a gun.
mariou69 2 years ago
nice timing with the music
Mrain56 2 years ago
is it normal they can't hit a single target ?
Wildcat222 2 years ago
Yes, they're scoring hits. The training rounds are going straight through the plywood targets and hitting the ground behind them.
A Co. 2/37 Armor, Vilseck 1989-90
2Scaryfast 2 years ago
they are hitting, it just goes straight through and hits the ground behind.
arasaka2020tm 2 years ago
they're training, so yes that is normal when you first start out :)
cutmullets 2 years ago
Read the below replies first so you'll know the answer before posting.
Deanzsyclone 2 years ago
they probably the rounds they're using Armor Piercing which is like a knife into butter for the targets so it just goes through them
N9602FL 2 years ago
It takes them a while to get the right ballistic sollution
Aucteg 2 years ago
Almost every shot is a hit. Projectiles pierce dummy silhouettes so effortlessly that you don't see any effect on the target other than a hole which can't be seen on this low quality, low resolution video
Jacnas 2 years ago
When was the last time you saw a paper target blow up from being hit by a 120mm SABOT round?
bronzeguy 2 years ago
theyre going through the target cos they arent hard enough to detonate the round
Duckbubbi 2 years ago
cuz the targets are plywood the round go right through
FutureMarine246 2 years ago
nice video love how ya got the recieveing end of the rounds, I was in old 1/63 in vilseck back in the day. Seen alot of Graf & Hohenfels too. Good shit bro.
gaotu 2 years ago
I thought the Abrams was acurate. Why is it missing and how come the rounds are not penetrating?
smka13 2 years ago
there ply wood targets. the round just punches thrugh like paper. The target then gose down after a hit. The dirt kick up is behind the target. These were all solid hits.
gaotu 2 years ago
the targets are paper and the rounds just go right through them.
sweetcuppincakes1 2 years ago
yea i was with C 1-35 but i left in summer 07. Good ole baumholder lol!! yea did 2 gunnerys up in graph!! now im sittin here at knox wishin i was back in germany!!
kooptaloopify 2 years ago
is the abrams like a modern tiger?
richy123xd 2 years ago
What is the name of this song?
vegetababi 2 years ago
LAST GRAF!! This ALMOST makes me miss the old days commanding an m1 a-nothing! They were so new then my tank's data plate said Xm-1! Neat vid. URRAHH!
frequentfiler 2 years ago
Dude, I did MANY Graf and Hoensfels rotations back in 97-00 with 1-37 1st BDE, great vid. Wish you had got some of the night fire stuff though!
circleseven76 2 years ago
wow this tank is killin..
mariowennars 2 years ago 2
I was in A 1/35 armor in baumholder Germany and remember many times going to gunnery. Had my head under a Humvee once when the range went hot and heard the first round go down range for the morning and smacked my head on the exhaust.
jamiebiddix 2 years ago
Hah .. baumholder aka the Rock ( or if you really knew it . . the @ss h0le of europe ) B 1-35 all the way
HOOOAAHHH BLACKJACK
Ibreakthings51 2 years ago
Finns are better.. ;)
zeroaja 2 years ago
that was an awesome video!! you did a great job of putting the music and video together.
tankgod12 3 years ago
night fire with the 120 can light up a valley, great sight to hear and see, Scouts Out
gallomia 3 years ago
i have been looking for a video showing the rounds travel downrange like this for so long, and today it just popped up on my recommended list.
freereloader1010 3 years ago
RPG-7 destroyed it in Iraq
lIlyTnik 3 years ago
In 2 years, I will be driving one of these.
RIPBOBMARLEY69 3 years ago
German tank gun.
stahlwerke 3 years ago
holy shit those otherfucker sabots were deflecting like hundreds of feet in the air holy shit
ECWUSA1995 3 years ago
this was a great crew and a great tank you cant compare to any other tank
bakergreen5 3 years ago
What's the name of that music? Been to Graf way back in the M60A1 and A3 days--early 80s. Also have been to Wild Chicken (Wildflecken) and Bergen Hohne.
thetsofan 3 years ago
Abrams is in a class of its own. No tank can stand up to it.
Gayruffan 3 years ago
Awesome
peashooter101 3 years ago 7
in war games abrams has been on top for a couple years now
potosi2 3 years ago 8
I love being a M1 Abrams main battle tank commander!
Soldier19KTanker 3 years ago 8
army or marines? just curious cus i want to join the marines, but i want to be a tanker and the army has the M1a2, but i really want to be a marine...help!
CaptainAmerica322 3 years ago
Since the crew is more important than the tank..id say Israel has the best...but concerning technology..its germany
BugattiVeyron123 3 years ago
you are an idiot
first of all, what qualifies you to say Israeli tank crews are better? Secondly, the Leopard is claimed to be "better" than the M1 because it is more fuel efficient and cheaper to produce. The M1 would kill it in the field though
jeo134 3 years ago 12
Excume me sir...but everybody knows that Leopard2A6 is better armored and more expensive...and they both use the same 120mm gun that of course IS GERMAN!
blast2003 3 years ago
With its german made Maingun - rofl...
ChristianCohn 3 years ago
"idiot"? What an itelligent way of discussing...
So what qualifications do you have to say one or the other is better?
In a test conducted by the swedish army, the Leo 2 won over M1, Leclrec, T-80 and Challenger. They choose the overall best tank. It is a fact.
BUT, comparing western tanks and saying which is best is for idiots, becasue they are more or less indentical, same gun (German Rehinmetal), same armor (UK Chobham)... Yes, M1 has DU armor, but that can be put on any tank.
swertinge07 3 years ago
Yeah we just got some L2A6M's in afgainistain and they say there great but not as good as the M1's
Pocketzszs 3 years ago
@jeo134 equally the M1 itself would be killed by many modern battletanks
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@jeo134: The Leopard 2 is more fuel efficient, but the Cost of the M1 is lower than the Leopard 2!
The M1A2 Abrams costs about 4 Million $ The Leopard 2A6 like 6,5 Million $
But the M1 has still better Firepower, and a greater Max. Range of Fire.
The Abrams with ARAT II Reactive Armor has an RHA Value of over 1000mm!
G0LD3NGAM3R1989 11 months ago
@jeo134 M-1 is better than leopard and merkava
DisgorgeKILLusa3 4 months ago
you are retarded...
usmcandrew16 3 years ago
I think the American crew is better cause they get more training, since they could be wasting $4.35 million if the crew doesn't get sufficient amount of training. And the Abrams can stand multiple RPG hits.
WWErules234 3 years ago
US and UK tank crews are the most combat hardend on earth. the tanks they drive are the most combat tested, and the M1 has killed all other tanks in war games.
CaptainAmerica322 3 years ago
is that ringold GA?? cause it shure looks like it
omgweapons 3 years ago
i like this vid!!
great music and so..
(hmm living not far away from grafenwöhr and hear you guys sometimes even shoot xD)
deutschhiphop 3 years ago
2:02 FTW!
longbow986 3 years ago
nunuhulze, even you have to admit that the abrams are the toughest tanks ever built
drubio12 3 years ago 2
the russian black eagle is the best ,beter than the leopard 2
zpkka 3 years ago
The Black eagle is just a T-80UM2 hardly better than a Leopard 2 or M1 or a Challenger 2
JNT11593 3 years ago
abrams rulzz
bily1995 3 years ago 4
is he missing?
cod4m14ownage 3 years ago
No jump audio to hear fire commands? Oh well, it'll sound like Chinese to some non-tanker.
Gunner Sabot Tank.
jrk922 3 years ago
does anybody know the music, the name?
o5c31u 3 years ago
requiem for a dream. is where its from.
tankgod12 3 years ago
i like how you can see the richoshets
Jackosaki 3 years ago
Leopard ist the best tank...everybody knows
NuNuSchulze 3 years ago
The Leopard 2 has a better drive train with the low IR diesel engine but has inferior protection when compared with the Abrams. US tank units have better IT/COM capability than anyone in the world.
radio187 3 years ago
It isn't just the tank, but the crew. The US Army has the best trained tank crews in the world. I'd bet on them against any other armored formation from anywhere.
castercamber 3 years ago
No way M1 Abrams is the best. And till the leopard won't prove itself better (maybe against an Abrams) then the M1 will be the best tank built ever. The only disadvantage of Abrams that it's expensive and it eats a lot...
SgtKanyo 3 years ago 3
awesome
DiVeronica 4 years ago
Nice, thx for making this vid! We all know Abrams are the best!
WhiteTiger91 4 years ago
great vid man
KINGD1991 4 years ago