Just test drove a Cidetal and I'm sorry but that was the best durago dodge has ever made. It has merc like features and it rides alot smoother than the older ones.It might be smaller but the detail of space inside the truck is much much better. My mom has a 05 and she is seriously thinkning about getting the citadel. I'm glad they made it smaller also.
i seen the new dodge durango it looked badass they called it a citdren or something like that on the side but when i went to the back it said citdren durango it looked badass though i would definatley buy one if i had the money
Kind of looks like a mix of A Nissan Armada and the new Toyota Sequoia XD but very nice...someone should do a sneak up and tear off those rags dont know if their street legal XD
The Ram Truck said it has a 5.7 HEMI, its all wheel drive and way to low to the ground, its ugly and is a waste. No family car needs a HEMI unless its a truck. Maybe Ram Trucks will make a 4 door Ramcharger, I know wishful thinking.
They're building it at the Jefferson Ave. plant in Detroit.....same place they build the Grand Cherokee. I bet it will be the cheaper version of the Grand. Give ME the Jeep.
Ohkay FOR EVERYONE who THINKS its smaller ITS NOT ! It still has 3 rows like all the others ! My DAD works for Chrysler , and we have one . This truck is the same in size , maybe a little smaller but nothing you can tell . ALOT of new FEATURES added . you will be impressed .
@emllos The V8 from DaimerC. is a masterpiece. So is the Hemi series. They weren't built for raw hp. Look into their designs a bit. They do their specified job very well. And of course you can always increased its hp... =)
my dad used to have a white 99 durango with tan leather seats/tan interior, 3rd rows seat real nice, really liked it alot and i was really hoping he would keep it till i got old enough to get my permit so i could drive it to school and stuff, but then he sold it a couple yrs ago for like 4k, now its the only vehicle im wanting to get lol
man wtf i been waiting on dodge to make a new durango , i have a 05 durango with a 5.7 in and i love it! and to here that the new one that i been waiting for might not even have a v-8 in it is bullshit! idk whats going on with the american 3 like ford is not even buting a v-8 in the new explore, like i had one of them two and it was a grate suv, but it needs a v-8, idk but us americans nedd are v-8 in are suv & trucks. like someone posted on here they are takeing away the durangos balls
If Chrysler/Dodge will go on in this direction, with their stupid car-phantasies.. I don't know, but I bet they will loose customers. They definitelly will. Chrysler itself okay got an Aspen.. But I dont want any Aspen, I would prefer an old good established SUV/Truck as Durango.
And oookay Gas is expensive nowadays (And I should know that, I am from Central Europe, we ve got gas-prices.. us-americans would knock their heads off, if they 'd know) but still SUV!!
I have an old 1999 Dodge Durango V8 SRT. And although it isnt in the best condition anymore (but still okay to drive and go offroad), it is way kooler than THAT one.
THEY KILLED IT. ..Thats nomore a Durango.. poor Durango, now they cut off your balls, now you just another Duranga-Leela. Cheerio. Tütü..
Sad, Dude, very Sad!!
Next time I ll go for Dodge Charger SRT or RT, if they cut its balls,too.. I dont know. Fuckin emancipation-car-mood-insanity.
It looks small. Why are these American car companies going small (Hope they don't turn the Tahoe's into crossovers). I like'em BIG! Fuck these crossovers. What, are they taking ideas from ladies or something?! Once I see all suvs going crossover, I'm no longer a fan of American suv's or I can just go with the Tahoe(and its cousins) or the Expedition (the only American trucks in my opinion thats still BIG). Or just roll with the imports. MEN NEEDS SUV's
@tsblair95 LEAVE YOU ALONE!!!!!!!??? LOL! You should of left me alone. I'm not going to look it up because its a small crossover you need to stfu and get with the facts. The crossover (no longer can I call this thing a truck or SUV) isn't out yet to do any comparison. I would like to see that.
@racingisfun The question was answered a month ago. I hate Crossovers. I came to this video thinking it was going to be a redesigned bigger and stronger Durango that would give GM and the imports a competition. Got my hopes up for nothing.
@Neonspinnazz30 WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the fuck is going on here. The Ford Expedition could be my only option for a big American SUV in the future if still available. The way GM is going I will no longer buy anything from them.
@paintballer653 Suburbans are just long Tahoes and performs the same job and they are truck/SUV's, and Excursions? I don't like Excursions. I rather have The Ford Expedition L. I haven't seen Dodge create a good Body-on-Frame Truck/SUV to compete with the new generation Suburban.
@PolishNyorker why do ppl call their SUVs truck? i've owned a durango and it was not tough the way a truck should be. the hemi was great but having to play it safe off-road (even on just dirt roads) made it basically a powerful mini van.
@pzpepsi For the crappy 2nd gen, yes. 1st gen is way better, I call mine a truck. It was based on Dakota, Ram, and Jeep Cherokee. Truck Chassis, weighed over 6k lbs, towing ability enough to compete with other American trucks of its day, the hp, ability to take offroading, the appearance... I love my '02 RT.
@ShadowKillah08 its still not a truck. i have a car that has a reinforced chassis and is awd. 400hp 290tq. its can tow plenty but its not a truck and neither is a suv
Well, if the SUV's has the same power-train as the Trucks then they are considered Truck too! For example, Tahoes, Suburbans, Yukon's (Denali's) and XL's, Escalade's and ESV's. Their frames, engines, transmissions, their whole power train features and design came from the trucks like Silverado, Sierra, you understand? That's why some SUV's are sometimes considered as Trucks. Crossovers are Crossovers considered as SUV's.
a rugged vehicle with a trucklike chassis designed for occasional off-road use. Abbreviation: SUV" thats the definition. notice it says "TRUCK-LIKE". So even if its is trucklike in many ways its still only LIKE a truck. "you understand?"
@pzpepsi DID YOU UNDERSTAND THAT DEFINITION YOU REPLIED TO ME? "(So even if its is trucklike in many ways its still only LIKE a truck)" You dumb dirt bag, from what you said THEY ARE CONSIDERED AS TRUCKS. My example was simple, those GM SUV's are trucks with an SUV body. Your to slow to realize it. And there's other definitions to SUV besides them being "TRUCK-LIKE". Some Can be Sporty and carry passengers and extra shit like station wagons, or vans.
@jjchargerboy16 you dont get it. i got that definition from a dictionary but you're say im wrong. i guess you would know more than a dictionary cuz you so smart and all. also saying its "truck-like" still doesnt mean its a truck. watch, you are getting all worked up over this discussion like a girl would. so you're "girl-like" does that make you a girl? no it doesnt, just girl-like. also, the chassis doesnt make a truck a truck. neither does a v8.
@Sherwin930 they are Fem.but when this car comes, it will be the ONLY RWD/AWD crossover on the market. and they are wrong. this will have a Big V8 under the hood. Ralph said they will be SRT's for every model.
@dnur567 ya it will... the 3.6L penastar v6 will give 18/26 and the 4.8L V8 will give 280 horses and 17/24 which is good for a full size suv and will have 5.7L hemi which will probably be 390 horses. and 20mpg
@MHaQuE32 how could a 4.8L V8 give it 280 horses if the new pentastar v6 with have exactly that amount (280 hp and 260 torque). when it comes out it will have 3.6L v6 and optional hemi. maybe they will come out with a smalller v8 later, but that will have hp in the early and possibly mid 300s, depending on whether or not they update the amount of hp in the hemi. oh and it might not have 390hp, probably at first it will have 360hp like the new grand cherokee that goes into production next month
@provehito44 dude ur kidding right?? u dont like the new gen ram?? its the best looking rugged truck and the durango looks pretty good.. but the spy vehicle isnt really a conclusion of anything
@vipermoon64 the new grand cherokee has a better interior than all the other chryslers, don't get me wrong, but the plastics still look cheap, and its wood still looks like it's never seen a tree.
@coolerdude44 well i love dodge and chrysler as a company and ur right on the interior but the wood isnt really suppose to look like a real wood tree.. wat cars acuatlly looks like tht.. but chrysler is really stepping up their interior likes the ram for example and the new 300 and charger coming out later
@MHaQuE32 every car's wood dash is real wood, and looks like such, except japanese and american cars. all european cars have real wood because europeans actually care about their cars...
and how could you like chrysler as a company? they haven't made one good car/business decision since the 70s, unless you count the mk1 viper.
@coolerdude44 dude r u kidding me chrysler made good ass cars tht sold for example the dodge caravan which sold more than 900,000- 1.2mill a year and is the 7th most popular vehicle sold in history.. and charger and 300 are good.. and i can go on but u really need to know ur facts before u say anything about chrysler and remember ... chrysler was once the top automaker in the 70s to 80s
@MHaQuE32 top automaker in the 70s and 80s? right... that's why they accepted government money during this time. i wouldn't exactly call the caravan a good car. when designing a minivan, you don't have to worry about making a balanced chassis, you don't have to worry about handling, you don't have to worry about performance. all you have to worry about is practicality, and how hard is it to make a 17 foot long box practical?
@coolerdude44@coolerdude44 well if this box is so horrible then that makes the other minivans by other companies even more horrible. because this best-selling box has the R.L. Polk Owner Loyalty award in the minivan category 9 years in a row, best v6 gas milage in its class, and won most dependable and reliable minivan in america by JD Power.
@coolerdude44 it also has the best 0-60 time, 2nd best hp, best torque, first 6-speed transmission in the category. and to top it off, 5 star crash test in front and side. and you complemented chrysler by saying they didnt try at all in this minivan becuase they still accomplished all of this.
@coolerdude44 now imagine if they did try...not only that, but later this year it will be refreshed and have a way better interior (from an already nicely designed and innovative interior). argue your way out of that!
@coolerdude44 no u said u cant call the minivan a good car. and you know (or atleast now know) it is a good car (atleast in its class). now i know chrysler isnt the best choice when it goes to value, and that the interiors and sometimes the exteriors are cheap (some interiors even ugly).
@coolerdude44 too many cars get bad gas milage compared to competition (although the you got to give them credit with the 5.7L HEMI), and a lot of their cars are underpowered (not counting expensive SRT, R/T, Overland, Limited, or Laramie trims). and i hate this new youtube for not giving me enough room to write
@coolerdude44 oh, ur wrong about the plastics still being cheap on the 2011 grand cherokee. they are soft touch on even the base model. and the overland trim uses real wood. and this is a fact
@MHaQuE32 secondly, the chrysler 300/dodge charger/challenger were all based on the 1990s Mercedes E-Class Chassis. these cars weren't good, but even if they were, we can't credit this to chrysler since they had nothing to do with chassis development. i rented a 300 recently, and it was appalling. the trim was literally falling off, and it's absolutely unacceptable to have a 4-speed automatic in a $30,000 car.
Well, first off.. no one is going to be rapping anything. It was "wrapped" because obviously they do not want the body styling to be revealed before it released.
The new Dodge Grand Cherokee.. lol
jcaled24 2 months ago
yes i live in michigan and i have a 98 durango thats my baby we had a bad winter but me and my durango didn`t know it they arew awsome
lucasglasper 8 months ago
U were extremely wrong mine has a 5.7 liter v8 id say thats a big v8
zone4music 8 months ago
no big v8s anymore dammnnnnnnnnnnn and wtf
sharpshooter93100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cuando sale ala venta en mexico?
crayolin16 1 year ago
cuando va a salir ala venta en mexico?
crayolin16 1 year ago
Just bought a 2011 Citadel Hemi, I love it!!!!!!
frankraimondi 1 year ago
This makes me sad. =[
ssj7warrior 1 year ago
Just test drove a Cidetal and I'm sorry but that was the best durago dodge has ever made. It has merc like features and it rides alot smoother than the older ones.It might be smaller but the detail of space inside the truck is much much better. My mom has a 05 and she is seriously thinkning about getting the citadel. I'm glad they made it smaller also.
heartboy86 1 year ago
i drove by this this summer my dad and i were so amazed and we saw it again at a gas station like 7 min. later it was driving arond tampa florida
1haitian1 1 year ago
It may be slightly smaller, but is not that underpowered. Try it out, you won't be disappointed.
stewhansens 1 year ago
ALL DODGES NEED A V8!
94supersnake 1 year ago
It looks like the Jeep Grand Cherokee body with a few changes.
Magnuspire 1 year ago
i seen the new dodge durango it looked badass they called it a citdren or something like that on the side but when i went to the back it said citdren durango it looked badass though i would definatley buy one if i had the money
ddog0804 1 year ago
Kind of looks like a mix of A Nissan Armada and the new Toyota Sequoia XD but very nice...someone should do a sneak up and tear off those rags dont know if their street legal XD
ellieysama 1 year ago
crossover is gay
realgraff16 1 year ago
The Ram Truck said it has a 5.7 HEMI, its all wheel drive and way to low to the ground, its ugly and is a waste. No family car needs a HEMI unless its a truck. Maybe Ram Trucks will make a 4 door Ramcharger, I know wishful thinking.
omg122448 1 year ago
They're building it at the Jefferson Ave. plant in Detroit.....same place they build the Grand Cherokee. I bet it will be the cheaper version of the Grand. Give ME the Jeep.
KukaJoe 1 year ago
i just saw one yesterday in rochester mi they look pretty bad ass
randomhero713 1 year ago
Ohkay FOR EVERYONE who THINKS its smaller ITS NOT ! It still has 3 rows like all the others ! My DAD works for Chrysler , and we have one . This truck is the same in size , maybe a little smaller but nothing you can tell . ALOT of new FEATURES added . you will be impressed .
datandrewkid 1 year ago
if there is no hemi and no 4wd, im not buying! c'mon dodge!
duckanddodge01 1 year ago
it's gonna have the 5.7 Hemi too and its not that small. its just lower.
DRUMSTIX5Baod 1 year ago
Why they do this why they not do BIG BIG BIG SUV WHY????? WHY BIG V8 hemi will have only 240hp WHY????? I'm cry:(
emllos 1 year ago
@emllos The V8 from DaimerC. is a masterpiece. So is the Hemi series. They weren't built for raw hp. Look into their designs a bit. They do their specified job very well. And of course you can always increased its hp... =)
ShadowKillah08 1 year ago
My parents have a 2006 Durango and and might be looking to upgrade to a newer model so I really want to know when it comes out.
crushingAJS 1 year ago
go spy on a ram 2011 2500
Mattman7342 1 year ago
my dad used to have a white 99 durango with tan leather seats/tan interior, 3rd rows seat real nice, really liked it alot and i was really hoping he would keep it till i got old enough to get my permit so i could drive it to school and stuff, but then he sold it a couple yrs ago for like 4k, now its the only vehicle im wanting to get lol
imnotawasteoftime 1 year ago
man wtf i been waiting on dodge to make a new durango , i have a 05 durango with a 5.7 in and i love it! and to here that the new one that i been waiting for might not even have a v-8 in it is bullshit! idk whats going on with the american 3 like ford is not even buting a v-8 in the new explore, like i had one of them two and it was a grate suv, but it needs a v-8, idk but us americans nedd are v-8 in are suv & trucks. like someone posted on here they are takeing away the durangos balls
bigangel1789 1 year ago
I'm going to buy a Chevy Tahoe, or Ford Expedition > Drive over to Dodge dealer. And tell them that my car is awesome, and theirs is a piece of shit.
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
"Expect smaller engines" Ow FFS!!!!
SecularTechnology 1 year ago
how do you even knw it was a dodge!?
adog2896 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a piece of shit
parmstrong32x 1 year ago
Me late que la nueva durango 2011 tendra el frente de la ram 2010.
Me gustan mucho estos carros fuertes poderosos de la dodge, ya que no son nada aburridos como otros que hay en el mercado.
Tengo una ram 2009 cabina corta 5.7 Hemi y estoy muy contento.
saludos.
verdimex 1 year ago
Once again something on my mind..
If Chrysler/Dodge will go on in this direction, with their stupid car-phantasies.. I don't know, but I bet they will loose customers. They definitelly will. Chrysler itself okay got an Aspen.. But I dont want any Aspen, I would prefer an old good established SUV/Truck as Durango.
And oookay Gas is expensive nowadays (And I should know that, I am from Central Europe, we ve got gas-prices.. us-americans would knock their heads off, if they 'd know) but still SUV!!
lesbenterror 1 year ago
Poor.. Very poor, Man.
I have an old 1999 Dodge Durango V8 SRT. And although it isnt in the best condition anymore (but still okay to drive and go offroad), it is way kooler than THAT one.
THEY KILLED IT. ..Thats nomore a Durango.. poor Durango, now they cut off your balls, now you just another Duranga-Leela. Cheerio. Tütü..
Sad, Dude, very Sad!!
Next time I ll go for Dodge Charger SRT or RT, if they cut its balls,too.. I dont know. Fuckin emancipation-car-mood-insanity.
lesbenterror 1 year ago
It looks small. Why are these American car companies going small (Hope they don't turn the Tahoe's into crossovers). I like'em BIG! Fuck these crossovers. What, are they taking ideas from ladies or something?! Once I see all suvs going crossover, I'm no longer a fan of American suv's or I can just go with the Tahoe(and its cousins) or the Expedition (the only American trucks in my opinion thats still BIG). Or just roll with the imports. MEN NEEDS SUV's
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago 12
@jjchargerboy16 Suburban?
rob16875 1 year ago
@rob16875 Suburban What?
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 they r not small dumbass
tsblair95 1 year ago
@tsblair95 How do you know dumbass.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 if u do research it would tell u how big it is moron :p
tsblair95 1 year ago
@tsblair95 How about you tell me, and stop trying to be a smarty pants, moron :p
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 I did tell u. its not small :p
tsblair95 1 year ago
@tsblair95 Thats not info. You know what, Its small and I'll be damn to drive a fuckin crossover ;D
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 its not small!! now stfu
tsblair95 1 year ago
@tsblair95 Its small!! now stfu
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 go online look it up and stfu!!!!!!!! it is not any smaller than the current durango!!!! LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!!!!
tsblair95 1 year ago
@tsblair95 LEAVE YOU ALONE!!!!!!!??? LOL! You should of left me alone. I'm not going to look it up because its a small crossover you need to stfu and get with the facts. The crossover (no longer can I call this thing a truck or SUV) isn't out yet to do any comparison. I would like to see that.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 AMEN!
BMWDRE10 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 i would imagine that its because big suv's sell about 1/4 of what they did 20 years ago
shiftedx2 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 whats with the hate? haha im fine with our enclave...
racingisfun 1 year ago
@racingisfun Well good for you.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 question not answered....
racingisfun 1 year ago
@racingisfun The question was answered a month ago. I hate Crossovers. I came to this video thinking it was going to be a redesigned bigger and stronger Durango that would give GM and the imports a competition. Got my hopes up for nothing.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 it's not like it got smaller...
racingisfun 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 Actually, GM announced that the new Yukon/Tahoe platform will be based off the Traverse crossover platform...
The death of the SUV is steadfast...
Neonspinnazz30 1 year ago
@Neonspinnazz30 WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the fuck is going on here. The Ford Expedition could be my only option for a big American SUV in the future if still available. The way GM is going I will no longer buy anything from them.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 what u mean espedition and tahoes are the only big truck? if u mean suv then u still have the suburban, the excursion etc
paintballer653 1 year ago
@paintballer653 Suburbans are just long Tahoes and performs the same job and they are truck/SUV's, and Excursions? I don't like Excursions. I rather have The Ford Expedition L. I haven't seen Dodge create a good Body-on-Frame Truck/SUV to compete with the new generation Suburban.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
I had a Durango RT..Was a great truck. The NEw ones sit to low to ground. The 98-00 models are the best ones
PolishNyorker 1 year ago 9
@PolishNyorker why do ppl call their SUVs truck? i've owned a durango and it was not tough the way a truck should be. the hemi was great but having to play it safe off-road (even on just dirt roads) made it basically a powerful mini van.
pzpepsi 1 year ago
@pzpepsi For the crappy 2nd gen, yes. 1st gen is way better, I call mine a truck. It was based on Dakota, Ram, and Jeep Cherokee. Truck Chassis, weighed over 6k lbs, towing ability enough to compete with other American trucks of its day, the hp, ability to take offroading, the appearance... I love my '02 RT.
ShadowKillah08 1 year ago
@ShadowKillah08 its still not a truck. i have a car that has a reinforced chassis and is awd. 400hp 290tq. its can tow plenty but its not a truck and neither is a suv
pzpepsi 1 year ago
Well, if the SUV's has the same power-train as the Trucks then they are considered Truck too! For example, Tahoes, Suburbans, Yukon's (Denali's) and XL's, Escalade's and ESV's. Their frames, engines, transmissions, their whole power train features and design came from the trucks like Silverado, Sierra, you understand? That's why some SUV's are sometimes considered as Trucks. Crossovers are Crossovers considered as SUV's.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 Sports Utility Vehicle:" –noun
a rugged vehicle with a trucklike chassis designed for occasional off-road use. Abbreviation: SUV" thats the definition. notice it says "TRUCK-LIKE". So even if its is trucklike in many ways its still only LIKE a truck. "you understand?"
pzpepsi 1 year ago
@pzpepsi DID YOU UNDERSTAND THAT DEFINITION YOU REPLIED TO ME? "(So even if its is trucklike in many ways its still only LIKE a truck)" You dumb dirt bag, from what you said THEY ARE CONSIDERED AS TRUCKS. My example was simple, those GM SUV's are trucks with an SUV body. Your to slow to realize it. And there's other definitions to SUV besides them being "TRUCK-LIKE". Some Can be Sporty and carry passengers and extra shit like station wagons, or vans.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 you dont get it. i got that definition from a dictionary but you're say im wrong. i guess you would know more than a dictionary cuz you so smart and all. also saying its "truck-like" still doesnt mean its a truck. watch, you are getting all worked up over this discussion like a girl would. so you're "girl-like" does that make you a girl? no it doesnt, just girl-like. also, the chassis doesnt make a truck a truck. neither does a v8.
pzpepsi 1 year ago
@pzpepsi blah blah blah.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@jjchargerboy16 fair enough
pzpepsi 1 year ago
@pzpepsi Yeah, I'm over this.
jjchargerboy16 1 year ago
@PolishNyorker
agreed. I hope to get a 98-2002 Durango. Way better than the new ones, plus it will sit higher and actually get through snow and stuff.
BullyScholarshipWii 11 months ago
Comment removed
obimako 1 year ago
dude fuck cross overs ther so feminine all cars these days are made for women =[
Sherwin930 1 year ago
@Sherwin930 they are Fem.but when this car comes, it will be the ONLY RWD/AWD crossover on the market. and they are wrong. this will have a Big V8 under the hood. Ralph said they will be SRT's for every model.
TomazHilton 1 year ago
They stopped makein the Durango? Because when i traded in my dodge nitro i was goion to get one
adog2896 1 year ago
but I like V8s :(
thegreenway1994 1 year ago
@thegreenway1994 so drop a v8 in there
tsblair95 1 year ago
Maybe YHWH are bring to old Durango look bake. The old one was lower then the one now, and I quite like it.
cib0514 1 year ago
Can't wait to see if they are going to make a LFO verison. Because this would team up well with the police charger.
JPorkins88 1 year ago
crysler rocks
wizard101emily 1 year ago
wonder whether the durango will have chrysler's new V6 engine
dnur567 1 year ago
@dnur567 ya it will... the 3.6L penastar v6 will give 18/26 and the 4.8L V8 will give 280 horses and 17/24 which is good for a full size suv and will have 5.7L hemi which will probably be 390 horses. and 20mpg
MHaQuE32 1 year ago
@MHaQuE32 how could a 4.8L V8 give it 280 horses if the new pentastar v6 with have exactly that amount (280 hp and 260 torque). when it comes out it will have 3.6L v6 and optional hemi. maybe they will come out with a smalller v8 later, but that will have hp in the early and possibly mid 300s, depending on whether or not they update the amount of hp in the hemi. oh and it might not have 390hp, probably at first it will have 360hp like the new grand cherokee that goes into production next month
vipermoon64 1 year ago
song name?
909Monopoly 1 year ago
@ phoenixm4
You do realize that the original Magnum was a coupe back from 1978-1979 right? Not the station wagon crap they came out with in 2005.
adogg619 1 year ago
Okay so it's a rear wheel drive crossover, but which car platform will it be riding on then? I'm guessing an entirely new one... ?
adogg619 1 year ago
why is dodge building such ugly vehicles now i like the charger,avenger,challenger and the previous gen of ram but now they are mostly ugly
provehito44 1 year ago
@provehito44 I agree,Dodge has some unique designs.You think the new Challenger is ugly? I seen one yesterday and I think their pretty cool.
LuxuryAndExotics 1 year ago
@LuxuryAndExotics no i like the the new challenger i said i liked the avenger,charger,challenger and previous gen ram
provehito44 1 year ago
@provehito44 dude ur kidding right?? u dont like the new gen ram?? its the best looking rugged truck and the durango looks pretty good.. but the spy vehicle isnt really a conclusion of anything
MHaQuE32 1 year ago
@MHaQuE32 i dont like how the bottom of the grill is pushed in
provehito44 1 year ago
sigh dodge is going to be so different. since dodge is dead now because its owned by fiat......
IsicanA7X 1 year ago
@IsicanA7X
Yeah i know what you mean =/
It's like having Ferrari owned by Renault, it just doesn't seem right ...
grezzer31 1 year ago
cant wait to c their new styling, i hope they finaly get something better
nwonknu8 1 year ago
I wish they would bring back the Magnum as a Magnum, not as this...
phoenixm4 1 year ago
will this be the first chrysler to have an interior not designed or put together by toddlers?! we can only hope.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44
maybe the 2nd haha. 2011 grand cherokee may 3rd or 10th
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 the new grand cherokee has a better interior than all the other chryslers, don't get me wrong, but the plastics still look cheap, and its wood still looks like it's never seen a tree.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 well i love dodge and chrysler as a company and ur right on the interior but the wood isnt really suppose to look like a real wood tree.. wat cars acuatlly looks like tht.. but chrysler is really stepping up their interior likes the ram for example and the new 300 and charger coming out later
MHaQuE32 1 year ago
@MHaQuE32 every car's wood dash is real wood, and looks like such, except japanese and american cars. all european cars have real wood because europeans actually care about their cars...
and how could you like chrysler as a company? they haven't made one good car/business decision since the 70s, unless you count the mk1 viper.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 dude r u kidding me chrysler made good ass cars tht sold for example the dodge caravan which sold more than 900,000- 1.2mill a year and is the 7th most popular vehicle sold in history.. and charger and 300 are good.. and i can go on but u really need to know ur facts before u say anything about chrysler and remember ... chrysler was once the top automaker in the 70s to 80s
MHaQuE32 1 year ago
@MHaQuE32 top automaker in the 70s and 80s? right... that's why they accepted government money during this time. i wouldn't exactly call the caravan a good car. when designing a minivan, you don't have to worry about making a balanced chassis, you don't have to worry about handling, you don't have to worry about performance. all you have to worry about is practicality, and how hard is it to make a 17 foot long box practical?
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 @coolerdude44 well if this box is so horrible then that makes the other minivans by other companies even more horrible. because this best-selling box has the R.L. Polk Owner Loyalty award in the minivan category 9 years in a row, best v6 gas milage in its class, and won most dependable and reliable minivan in america by JD Power.
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 it also has the best 0-60 time, 2nd best hp, best torque, first 6-speed transmission in the category. and to top it off, 5 star crash test in front and side. and you complemented chrysler by saying they didnt try at all in this minivan becuase they still accomplished all of this.
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 i never said they didn't try, i said that making a good minivan doesn't make you a good company.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 now imagine if they did try...not only that, but later this year it will be refreshed and have a way better interior (from an already nicely designed and innovative interior). argue your way out of that!
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 now, defend the dodge nitro and the rest of the rubbish they make.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 no u said u cant call the minivan a good car. and you know (or atleast now know) it is a good car (atleast in its class). now i know chrysler isnt the best choice when it goes to value, and that the interiors and sometimes the exteriors are cheap (some interiors even ugly).
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 too many cars get bad gas milage compared to competition (although the you got to give them credit with the 5.7L HEMI), and a lot of their cars are underpowered (not counting expensive SRT, R/T, Overland, Limited, or Laramie trims). and i hate this new youtube for not giving me enough room to write
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 oh, ur wrong about the plastics still being cheap on the 2011 grand cherokee. they are soft touch on even the base model. and the overland trim uses real wood. and this is a fact
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 i don't care what they say, lexus makes the same claim, but they both look like they've never seen a tree.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44 well im guessing u like car and driver. cuz they said it
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 i thought they might be retiring the over land name?
homeboylx 1 year ago
@homeboylx im sorry, this was a long time ago...what was i talking about?
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@homeboylx oh ya the overland name. no the 2011 grand cherokee has an overland name
vipermoon64 1 year ago
@vipermoon64 oh, they're brining it back?
homeboylx 1 year ago
@MHaQuE32 secondly, the chrysler 300/dodge charger/challenger were all based on the 1990s Mercedes E-Class Chassis. these cars weren't good, but even if they were, we can't credit this to chrysler since they had nothing to do with chassis development. i rented a 300 recently, and it was appalling. the trim was literally falling off, and it's absolutely unacceptable to have a 4-speed automatic in a $30,000 car.
coolerdude44 1 year ago
@coolerdude44
maybe the 2nd haha. 2011 grand cherokee may 3rd or 10th
vipermoon64 1 year ago
bring back my dodge magnum dammit! not this thing...
oldsoulyoungbody 1 year ago
Another grocery getter SUV.
NIKON777 1 year ago
@NIKON777
Just my thought!
rubiks15 1 year ago
Well, first off.. no one is going to be rapping anything. It was "wrapped" because obviously they do not want the body styling to be revealed before it released.
nugget254 1 year ago
Comment removed
nugget254 1 year ago
veryvery nice video!
TheTuningBoys 1 year ago
nice car... I guess lol why the f*ck did you rapped this car in duct tape? xD
LPWWE06 1 year ago
@LPWWE06 the tape is camouflage so that people cant see what is underneath it all :p
Egil8D 1 year ago
@Egil8D yeah I figured it out myself but... why? you can google it and see the car w/o any shit on it.. ok nvm... lol
LPWWE06 1 year ago
@LPWWE06
Most times pics on google are purely spec or concept and most of the time if its in tape its production ready (design wise).
rubiks15 1 year ago
NICE FOOTAGE!
ThePhiltastic 1 year ago
This car definitely looks like a cross-dresser.
ReSanSax 1 year ago