Added: 3 years ago
From: ConspiracyWorld
Views: 5,807
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Demolished for safety" was the original official story. It might even be the truth! So why go with "fire collapse" at the last minute? Because some sissy bureaucrat (like Rudy Giuliani) got cold feet. Maybe he was afraid of questions, like who did what, what did they do, when did they do it, where did they do it, you know....journalism. So he went with a lame lie. He's so lame it didn't seem lame to him... but now the government is stuck with it.

  • Heck, the BBC reported that WTC7 was going to come down 25 minutes before it came down. It must have been an inferno. Oh, there was no fire. Hmmmmmm.

  • and boom goes the dynamite.

  • I didn't hear any "booms".

  • @davesecx

    Strange because i did not hear several loud booms like you conspiracy theorists like to ignore.

  • got thats scary shit

  • "What we've been fearing all afternoon has apparently happened."

    Yes, I remember on 911 the anticipation of the news shows that WTC 7 would collapse. The fire department had feared it would collapse. So much for the secret demolition theory. Thanks for this video.

  • crazy

  • omg ur fucking stupid, a-hole

  • They didn't. They crashed because they felt like it. HOW DO YOU THINK THEY CAN COLLAPSE FROM PLANES CRASHING INTO THEM?! Dumb ass

  • @firstritestelevision no lol how can 3 towers collapse from 2 planes ahha

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more