pictures from the moon:apollo 11,12,14,15,16 & 17

[datzfast]

DEAR NASA im still looking for craters on those mountains. not black hole looking things im looking for impact damage like a pitting of the mountain side somthing that indicates a huge friggin rock slamed into it. you managed to put them everywhere except on the sides of the hills. also i understand the hiil sides are impact craters but dammit they get hit by smaller ones. and dont pull that missing star shit on me.

[YDDES]

@datzfast If You mean that You think there should have been stars in the lunar sky on these photos, You must be EXTREMELY ignorant about how cameras work. If they photographed the lunar ground, illuminated by the strongest sunlight possible, and got the ground properly exposed, how could the faint stars be visible on the photos?

Iif You look closely at 6:24, their are more footprints, almost covered by dust. They jumped around a lot, always stirring up the dust which immediately fell down.

[datzfast]

@YDDES even if your right no one will believe you. that is so far out in left field it sounds nuts. your going to ask rational people to believe that they unintentionally filled in the rover tracks with kicked up dust and your proof is partially filled in foot prints. you are as deluded as they come sir. and didnt i say to leave the missing star shit out that it was no defence of the moon tracks but not you. oh no you have to some how work it in like a lame duck running for president.

[YDDES]

@datzfast Well it was You who mentioned the missing stars. I just commented that. I don't care if You don't believe the footprints have erased the rover-tracks and the kicked up dust has in turn erased many of the footprints (You can actually see the remains of earlier footprints, almost covered, around the Rover). Most hoax believers deny every explanation that goes against their "theories".

[datzfast]

@YDDES it would be very difficult to hide the tire tracks on purpose, it word be impossible to hide the tire tracks by accident. i dont believe it was a colossal oversight, i believe it was a blatant and intention to expose the truth.

i used the word believe many times didn't i. hardly a theory. i suppose you can test a theory. belief like religion requires no test. so a test would simple.

[datzfast]

@datzfast but as said its my belief the tire tracks were filled in on purpose so people wold suspect they were filled in on purpose. what would be the gain? the gain is people would know these were earth photos.

[YDDES]

@datzfast OK, You are of course free to believe what You want, but it's not impossible at all that the footprints and upkicked dust has covered the Rover tracks. Do You think that the astronauts or "stagehands" covered the tracks without no one responsible for the "hoax" saw it? When it happened or on the photos before they were made public?

[YDDES]

@datzfast The same goes for the photo at 7:56. They have moved a lot around the buggy, always kicking up dust. Only the latest footprints are not dust covered.

Absolutely NO PROOF for a hoax...

[voxdeihn]

excelente video, gracias por el aporte

[Prenty52]

ALL those images could have been taken in remore high desert areas on Earth

[YDDES]

@Prenty52 NO, they couldn't have been taken in an Earth desert, because it would have been impossible to illuminate such vast areas with only one lightsource (no double shadows, no fading light).

[datzfast]

@YDDES why couldnt you use the sun durring daylight and then just paint the sky black either with a blue screen tech, or a post modification?

[YDDES]

@datzfast Couldn't have been bluescreen for several reasons: For example, there's at least one scene where the camera pans almost 360 degrees round the horizon, and at least one scene where the movie camera is placed on the moving Rover, running across the landscape. Clear sunlight and black sky all the time. It was more easy to send men to the Moon than to build a several thousand feet high bluescreen around an area of MANY football fields.

After all, they built and launched the rockets...

[Afrocanook]

I'm not saying the Apollo Missions were a hoax, but if there's absolutely no water or moisture on the moon, then why is the soil sticking together and recording the astronaut's footprints?

[YDDES]

@Afrocanook The moondust particles stick together because 1: They are much more sharper (no smooth "weathered" surfaces) and 2: There is no air molecules between them.

[datzfast]

@Afrocanook try this, take a box very dry corn starch, pour it on a plate. press an object into it. walah i just proved the moon isnt cheese its corn starch. MOON dust has majical properties, it is blasted away from landing sites and then piles up underneith to leave foot prints. at 6:24 we see a pole and foot print no way you cant place the pole into the ground a leave one foot print. At 7:56 we all see a foot print and a buggy that got to the same spot without any printing in the same soil.

[datzfast]

@datzfast did i mention the moon soil is magical. i think anybody who looks at the photos realizes they are real photos but are studio creations. in other words the buggy was placed and dust sprinkled all around it. i really think the people making the photos were leaving us clues to be discovered at a latter date. or to just brag to thir trusted friends, see i made these fake photos , im an important person, and here is the proof they are fake.

[YDDES]

@datzfast Not all the dust was blown away during he landing. You can check what thrust the LEM's engine produced during the final landing moments (1,050 pounds, and it was completely shut off before touchdown). Also: In vacuum, the exhaust gases dissipated very quickly in all directions. So, there was plenty of dust left to leave footprints.

[willowtreephoto]

Wow a nice video about the moon without the hoax freaks commenting up a storm.

Thanks!

[ggv85]

The song is "lunar sea" from the album moonmadness.The artist is a group called camel.

[synthsteve]

I like the music, who is the artist and what is the title?