Added: 5 years ago
From: ssokre
Views: 225,876
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yf 22 raptor is better

  • @bassbeast117 it's actually most certainly not ;-)

  • @AnimusPipboy the su 37 is not made of radar absorbing material and the design of the raptor makes it so it cant be locked on to, the raptor has tighter and more moveable exaust nosles witch give it alittle more manuverability

  • @bassbeast117 You think the "stealth" makes F22 better?!All Russian radars could easily detect your precious F22.The actual stealth is minimal advantage.This technology doesn't make it invisible.The Raptor have never been proven in actual dogfight also it CAN'T fly in rain,dust,or snow because of the "stealth" cover which will start melting as ice cream on sun.Also because it's weight can't fly more than 1.7 hours.Oh and it's on 4++ generation if we have to be correct.SU T-50 is №1 and SU 37>F22

  • @AnimusPipboy its not mage out of the same material as the b2, i never said it can be detected on radar i said it cant be locked on, and it has been tested in the heat and dust and snow in alaska and arazona and has super cruse witch allows it to cruse at a speed of 1200 mph AND its made of a light weight titanium witch makes it lighter than the su 37, it has a weapons bay witch holds the weapons inside makeing it easyer to cut through the air

  • @bassbeast117 Still it's american aircraft so it fails :-p All you jets need lot more maintenance than ours and yours are easily breakable.You can put any SU or MiG to stay outside without cover on rain,snow even tornado for few years and hell it still gonna start!While the american fighters are made just to look "awesome" i think that was your word.Hahaha lol Just to counter you my grandparents still have 50~ years old soviet TV,refrigerator,radio and car and guess what they all work like new!

  • @AnimusPipboy oh so your russin not american i see why this argument is going as long as it is, dont get me wrong the su35 is an great plane its one of my favorites but in MY opinion i like the f22 batter, in YOUR opinion u think the su 35 is better, thi migs tho are like the ak 47's of the sky cheap to build and reliable, whats your favorite mig, i like the fulcrum

  • @bassbeast117 Honestly i like the MiG 29 too and if it wasn't my HAWX game i would never know NATO calls it "fulcrum" :D Anyway i see you know stuff about your fighters and i want to ask you why F-14 isn't in service anymore?Because that's my favorite US made aircraft and i wonder because it's on about the same age as F-15.

  • @AnimusPipboy well the f-14 tomcat is out of service any more because if u have noticed fighter jets have been getting smaller, faster and more agile then the monsterous tomcat, the tomcat i beleive was the last 2 seater jet, and with all the new tech being built there is only 1 piolet needed

  • INDIA helped make that plane. 

  • WHATS THE NAME OF DA SONG?

  • F22 can take this thing out without even seeing it.

  • Unfortunately, it's not stealthy, so... SAMs and AtoA. :(

  • SU-37 THE BEST PLANE ON ASS

  • ...as I read on other vid...people who really know dont go and post stupid things against f22 XD couse no one care abou cancelled projects...here peopple know the TVC done on f22 its 23 years old tecnologi made by klimov and Aliulka...plus I never see on all vids a f22 doing a cobra couse the computer doesent allow it XD

  • Sure, 4 seconds to whip your plane rear around and bring guns to bear is MUCH faster than a complete barrel BUT!... the UFO are showing 90 degree revectoring at 4000 mph+, thus making 4 seconds... WAY TOO SLOW!! Earthling always fixate on themselves and their petty skirmishes! It is the FUTURE we should all be headed for and I don't mean, WHO IS THE BEST ON EARTH!

  • I wanna see these in the next Top Gun movie! Fuck the Mig 29! and btw WHAT THE FAWK IS THE NAME OF THE SONG!!!????

  • 27 F-22 pilots were shot down by 2 Su-37's at the same time!

  • @BusinessKi11ER Ace combat does not count.

  • Best jet until the PAK FA comes out

    !

  • f-22?? is garbage ... this is real not a dream ... can the f-22 do that?? never.... the su-37 is the best fighter in the world ... superior in a dogfight .. its better. stealh?? not for russia radar jajajaj..

  • @crazydraken1 Dog fighting is a thing of the past. The missles the world uses now can hit you from 60 miles away and beyond. The F/A-22 is the best military aircarft in he world. It uses a satellite radar system. Therefor it can target an opposing aircraft and that aircraft will never know. It is the only plane on Earth that can fly at mach 1.5 without using afterburners. Whatever aircraft the F/A-22 goes up against won't even know it's there untill too late. Better do some research.

  • @TwinSmoke Only an American jet could be the best to an American. Put the politics and flag waving away. This was an awesome accomplishment regardless of where you are from.

  • @kloudkreeper Other than it's vectored thrust, does this plane have ANYTHING else that differs it from any other Russian mig? The answer is no.

  • @TwinSmoke even other russian MiGs and SUs have thrust vectoring,so this plane has LITERALLY NO new features whatsoever, and it can only do these maneuvers with 25% fuel no weapons,avionics,radar,and ANYTHING that adds unnecessary weight. put a full combat load on this plane and an F-18 could outmaneuver it XD but at a price of over $75million it really is a worthless pice of shit XD

  • @hotpocketpoison 356 mill for f 22.. or 75 mill for su 37.. Hmmm.. 4.7 to 1... I would take 4 su 37 and safe 56 million dollars...

  • @eretuev cmon man, grow a brain, everyone knows that whole $350million thing is just a stupid myth. if you got that from that dumb Rachel Maddow episode(which the air force personally ashamed by proving EVERYTHING they said wrong)than that explains your ignorance, a stupid person listening to an even more stupid person...how predictable.

  • @hotpocketpoison who is "everyone knows"? who is Raichel Maddow?? bro my brain is big enough to do my own research.... f 22 program is cancelled for many reasons... and Russia successfully introduced on MAKS 2011 new T-50 PAK-FA and su 35 bm, mig 35, ka 50-52, mi 28,su 34 etc.. How many countries participate to build F22 or F35? Or u think its 100% made and developed in USA? Thx for "grow a brain"! I will. U don`t have too.. i like the way you are

  • @eretuev the F-22 is not"cancelled",cancelled would imply giving up entirely the F-22 and scrapping every F-22 we have,but we ARNT we just arnt building anymore because they are expensive.and it took the russians 21 years to come up with the T-50 after we made the F-22,and the Mi-28 is NOTHING compared to the AH-64D(i actually just taught another ignorant person that using hard facts),and even the Ka-50 looses in many categories(even though it took another 25 years for that to come out XD)LOL!!!

  • @hotpocketpoison I don`t to wont argue bro.. some day u`ll make ur research.. My contry for over than 100 years is in a deepshitt. Too bad our economics cant support our science. But look at us! We still here! And we are capable to put some $hit together on our own!

  • @eretuev i have done my research, i wouldnt post without doing so.

  • Maneuver is superb, but its no match from the american advanced missile

    It will become garbage on the air.

  • Does anyone find it funny that the SU-35 and SU-37 look alots like the F-15? LOL!!!

  • АМЕРИКОСЫ СОСУТ! RUSSIA NUMBER 1!

  • doesnt worth $150 million 

  • Самый лучший самолет в мире!

  • WHATS THE NAME OF THAT FUCKING SONG AT 2:05?!?!?!?1?1?111!?!?!?1?1?1?­!

  • this thing would get screwed by the F-22

  • I rather fly one of these than our F22, This baby has no reason to hide

  • nice video, but where is the rest of it?

  • No number 1, everyone is equal, people are the same everywhere. Greetings from Russia

  • @boeing747sp86 Like the founder of microsoft using an I-mac

  • @boeing747sp86 Politics

  • Yekshamesh very nice

  • OMFG! Anyone know the music!?!?

  • @Landotter1 im pretty sure, that both of our countries could destroy this little blue planet in 5 minutes. but who need this? i dont. im against wars. im for peace in the world. they should stop wars against little defenseless countries and start intensive working together by investigating/researching the space, some other planets, im sure, there we can find some other enemy, that we can fight together and test our weapons (just looked battle of LA :D)

  • @Feuerelement We are on the same page brother... I'm sick of the fighting and hatred... There's just too much cool shit to experience in our world, to be fighting all of the time.... Fuck-it!!!! I'm done fighting. I want to make a lot of friends!!! :-D I hope to make it to Germany so can I ask you to hook me up with some real German beer, sourkraut and good sausage??? :-D Maybe even some of those wonderful looking Pasteries or deserts? I'm buying! I just want traditional food man.. woo-hoo!!!

  • @Feuerelement If you make it to USA and are traveling through Texas, you just call on ole otter and We'll hook you up with some legendary Texas barbeque. Texas is known for its barbeque. We'll start you off with some tender beef brisket or some pulled pork tenderloin sandwitches or chicken or all 3 if you are hungry. Then we'll follow it with a few cold beers and some cobbler. After, we'll teach you to speak some TEXAN!!! :-D You'll leave a happy traveler, to be sure!!! See, making friends!!!!

  • @Landotter1 i mean. i live in germany like 10 years. i have good moments in my memory with people of many nations here, also americans. some people in USA dont realy know where is Russia on the world map (i mean its a biggest country on the map), but they hate Russia cause they saw in hollywood film, that Russia is bad. or take a georgian war as example. georgia attack russian people in abkhasia, american news say that russia attack georgia first.

  • @Feuerelement Yeah, but most Americans know that the news is a bunch of shit anyway. I have a good friend from Germany and have met other Germans and I got along great with them. I am NOT the typical American. I am facinated by other cultures, languages and whatnot. Oh, and my wife is Bealrussian! :-D Can't wait to go back and go fishing in Lepel!!!! When I went to Russia and saw that the people were just like we are... I hated the media and our government for all of their lies....

  • @Landotter1 hi, we are not realy different. we are same people but have other languages :) same religion ( just some couple days difference of christmas) im atheist, so i dont realy know much of religion staff. You drinking beer and looking football/baseball, we dringking beer and looking soccer/icehockey (there is many examples, but only 500 signs to write in comment)

    actually only one thing is different, its a government and TV propaganda that make us different and let us hate each other.

  • @Feuerelement Don't even get me started about governments. :-D I hate my government. My opinion of them.... ( Those dirty, rotten, lieing, cheating, stealing, sons-of-bitches ) I have been to Russia once and Belarus once. The US govt. shouldn't let us travel over seas. We come back with the revelation that our government are a bunch of liers. I found the people in both countries to be warm and a great sense of humor. They were VERY polite and hospitable..... I don't hate everyone...

  • WHATS THE NAME OF THE SONG!?!?!

  • sexiest flying thing ever..

  • That is just crazy.. and to think that they already had some of these as early as the cold war..

  • su 37 besst yeah u crack me up kid as far best is considered it is the sukhoi t-50 fgfa 5th generation fighter and only IAF n RAF have that fighter n its not only considered a russian but also an INDIAN fighter and that makes india the 4th country after USA,russia,china to have a stealth fighter of its own

  • but it is created in russia and it is truely russian tecnology in side and out. not much of indian in it. read about it m8. i say yeh india invest alot in it but it is still russian tech in showing:)

  • WHATS THE NAME OF THE MUSIC TRACK?!?

  • those wont work if you cant see the enemy

    

  • @grubbyray34 i assume you are talking about the f 22 which stealth is flawed if you do some reasearch

  • @grubbyray34 i assume you are talking about the f 22 which stealth is flawed if you do some research

  • Sexy

  • meh just a test plane thats all it ever will be.

  • @1bearcatf8f

    Hate to disappoint you, but the Su-30 is in active service and the thrust vectoring systems are now on all modern Flanker and fulcrum series aircraft, save for the Su-34.

  • @SukhoiSu47 Uh so? I already know that

  • @1bearcatf8f

    Then why did you say "meh just a test plane thats all it ever will be"?

  • @SukhoiSu47 because i wasnt talking about that su-30 alright?? i was talking about the SU-37

  • @1bearcatf8f noup all ready beying sent to russian wings:)

  • @1bearcatf8f india has about 220-240..su 30 air dominance flankers..already in service..with the same thrust vectoring capabilities of the su 37..at red flag and cope india exercises, they dominated...with a kill ratio of 90:10..against US fighters..srry to dissapoint u mate..but thaz the truth

  • @MegaServantofgod The SU-30 is nothing to the F-22,India relys on good planes not good pilots.Thats the problem with air forces.The US has top notch pilots,many are combat vets and know a thing or two about fighting.The F-22 would easily dominate the SU-30 because of its stealth.If the EF-2000 faced the SU-30 it would win because the EF-2000 is a simble of British engineering at its finest.

  • @1bearcatf8f Stealth as a tech has failed my friend, even the base series of s 300 can detect and bring her down, proof of it was in kosovo, s75 brings down the stealth, its become obsolete with the invent of stronger defence and awac shields, the rest of the comparisons are on BVR(which i,m sure both planes do have), maneuverability, Its fact that both the su 30s and su 37, forget the FGFA, are much better than the f22, indians use better pilots(eg, red flag, cope India exercises)

  • @MegaServantofgod No the F-117 wasnt in ful stealth mode,besides the radar cross section was to big for it period.And the little sneaky russian and chinese rats stole that and now brings forth the T-50 and J-20.STealth is more suited to a large bomber such as the B-2.And its proved to be extremely small on radar if not then the size of a small bug.The F-22 is very stealthy to,same with the F-35,and F-15SE.You ASUME the SU-37 is better but russian pilots are poor flyers short and simple.

  • @1bearcatf8f There is no mode for stealth. What did you mean? Stealth concept is from Nazi Germany and invented by Russians. B-2 bomber is a copy from Nazi Germany aircraft project. F-22 can stay stealthy but cant do any kind of attack. If their radar is on then its a hot target for enemy aircraft. And F-22 cant perform a close combat even with Mig-21.

    You are the only one who find Russian pilots are poor!! Even USAF accept that Russian pilots are highly skilled and professionals.

  • @JineshJK For anyone to say that a country who builds and flies an aircraft like this one with this kind of skill, to be poor, is trying to cover up something. Of course the US military takes Russian military seriously. They would be fools not to,,, and they aren't fools. This aircraft is nothing short of awesome. I love watching these videos... The days of "we're better than you,,, we're no.1" are long gone friends. To talk in such a way, shows a total lack of intelligence.

  • @Landotter1 But sadly no one listen to US army. Its all about NATO. US army is just a tool for Hollywood. If you need to say you are better then say "I am better or we are better". The aircraft is nothing for someone. But it doesnt mean anything. No other aircraft in the world is able to perform these maneuver. Then accept that fact and hide your own inferiority complex. thus able to avoid sentence like "We are better... We are No.1". Thats it.

  • @JineshJK I sure hope I'm misunderstanding you here. What inferiority complex do you refer to? Obviously you didn't understand what I tried to say. Read it again before you just pop your mouth off. I SAID... " The days of saying " we are better than you and we are no.1" are OVER. If you have a question about what someone means, you should ask, instead of being rude. Otherwise, be quiet if yhou have noithing nice to say.

  • @Landotter1 Yeah I didnt understand anything about your comments. I just replied to the quote "We are better than you.. we ar no.1" and the video subject here. That still you need to say "we are good" in some fields. Its a fact I believe in that. but unnecessary "We are better" claims are from inferiority complex. And dont avoid those words because of its age and wide usage. And My first comment in here all about to question another guys argument technically. Sorry if my words hurt you..Sorry.

  • @JineshJK Well, allright then.... no harm, no foul... Like I said. The fact that a country could design, build and fly this type of aircraft, with THAT level of skill cannot be ignored. Old technology.... Who invented the hydrogen bomb? Russia! Who invented lassick eye surgery and the machines to perform it? Russia! First in space? Russia! First human in space? Russia! There are many brilliant people in Russia. I have no problem saying that. It's the truth... Russians are far from stupid!!!

  • @Landotter1 Really, Russia invented the Hydrogen Bomb? MMMMM, no!

  • @sakoshooter48 I got Teller on video stating it.... mmmmmm yes....

  • @Landotter You know, I have a very hard time with people like you as we detonated the first H-bomb on Eniwetok atoll 4 years before the Soviets had theirs up and running. So, either you cough up the 'video' or keep your commie propaganda spewing shit hole closed!

  • @sakoshooter48 Keep my shit hole closed? Well, if I could physically touch you I'd close you down in a second. "The Atomic Bomb Movie" on DVD No coughing needed, fuck stick. It has been on the market for at least 10 years.

  • @sakoshooter48 "The Atomic Bomb Movie" on DVD No coughing needed, fuck stick. It has been on the market for at least 10 years. Yes, you would have a hard time with me with a mouth like yours... I'd keep mine closed if I were you. You never know what kind of person you are talking to. You damn sure don't know me, dickhead.

  • @sakoshooter48 Oh and further more... I can't keep my commie propoganda spewing shit hole closed because I can't keep you quiet. :-D

  • @1bearcatf8f and a simple reason why russian or indian or israeli pilots are considered better are because they got real hardcore stuff to study, whilst in college, way ahead of the rest of the world(math , science and aviation)...money does matter, but its not the only thing that matters....

  • radzey966: So what?, are you envy of this extraordinarie machine

  • Unequivocally, Russian fighters the best in the world! But, besides they and the most beautiful! In flight plane SU-37 - the most beautiful fighter from all which I when - or saw!

  • Gent/ladies, the best fighter aircraft is not just about manueverbility - which is good in close combat. The rest of the factors; how many weapons it can carry, how good it is in seeking the advesaries, can he defend itself from others, how small the aicraft is in the eye of radar (stealthy), how long it can fly in without refuelling.... and many more. Remember, air-to-air weapons/missiles now can shoot you from hundreds miiles away.

  • @radzey966 therz is no stealth technology as such..if ur referring to the F22, it is easily detected by the NAM bar radars in the su 30 , su 37 series..plus also the s 300, s 400 triumph..SAMs..forget russia..evn indian Su 30s, can detect stealth..AAMs can be easily jammed with powerful radars from the Su 30, 37 series..they can refuel..not ure about the payload..but the plane looks huge..so it all boils down to a dogfight..i,m in it with the ruskies..

  • My favorite fighter plane for sure! F-16 and F-14 are tied for second.

  • at 0:01 I loved USA. At 4:10, I loved Russia. WTF IS GOING ON DAMMIT?

  • @Brokkolesz

    You turned faggot. That is what's going on.

  • @IauthenticI umad

  • the plane is not the limit, the limit is the pilot

  • I totally agree

  • so fuckin`good!!!

  • RUSSIA No1  :)))

  • this is fucking awesome!!!! make cars do that!!

  • It's a high! Does great engineering make you cry? Yeah me too. I'm crying!

  • That's what I call, Made in Russia

  • maybe not the best plane on earth but THE MOST MANEUVERABLE FOR SURE!!!

  • any person or country with power will use it to the extreme its human nature i am 6ft,204 lbs i am calm but once in a while i like to fight just for the fun of it.

  • betwwen russia and USA russia is more totalitarian ,if russia is so great why are younger russians so eager to move to america,TU95 is noisiest airplane and can be spotted before it launches weapons,USA has 18,170 air based units RUSSIA has 3,888 USA 75 to 80 subs russia 61.USA 520,400,000,000.defense budget RUSSIA 43,200,000,000. I like to see the two nations work together rather than compete USA better in some areas while russia better in other,i see middle east as bigger enemy than russia

  • Unless you live there don't say its totalitarian I lived there and its not. Russia is a country that NEEDS hard rules. Such is the region. US will never understand Russia the way it is and any attempt to westernise Russia will fail. It will follow its own course. As for military budgets - Compare the cost of creation of F-15 vs that of Su-27. WIth similar level of avionics Flanker was superior kinematically and cheaper to make, maintain and operate. You need to see that Russia responds

  • terrorists in iraq are men who are unemployed and desperate. USA will not leave because of big oil reserve better to stay and build insfrastructure and invest in business.afghanistan will serve as air base if any conflict arise in pakistan iran or middle east . USA not really worried about russia to much money between the two, china to dependent on USA to cause war,dont see what preventive strike russia willl have to carry out ,europes younger generation dont want war.

  • @mrbluemagik1 cont. asymmetrically. They make a counter to possible opponents strategy and then develop their own similar capability. They prefer strategic deterrent rather then "I can swarm you" deterrent. US relies HUGELY on technology and Russians make equalizers to make tech impotent. So Russians spend money differently hence budget is smaller.

    I don't want war either. Only a fool does. I merely discuss capability and doctrine.

  • You don't know truth about war in Serbia. Your country loves to attack the innocent and helpless.

  • cool for air shows, american 5th generation missiles lock on to movement or heat with laser or radar in a split second, maneuvers count for nothing american tech can also jamm russian controls and weapons, american jet exhaust is reduced by 94 % with f 22 exhaust nozzle wich will be on other existing models so uh good luck

  • @mrbluemagik1 It's not about how fast you lock on to the target, which has no room for improvement since the first generation, but from how afar, which is provided by AESA radars and new long range missiles which Russians have as well. The missile still can be outmaneuvered. Now, considering that there is a limited number of missiles and both being fired roughly from same distance , the one who dodges more of them wins. Jamming is just a joke not worth responding to.

  • @klin1klinom  in air combat jet to reach higher alltitude has bigger advantage to shoot first and leave ,russsia does not have advanced components and outdated tracking radars, they have good missiles but limited amount, they have lots of sam;s and ground based anti air vehicles america has vey advanced components, pilots with more flight hours and bigger air force. russian jets are faster but limited to their fuel range and forward control. america has weapons we dont even know about.

  • @mrbluemagik1 Range of 4000km you call limited?

    Lets compare the AESA-equipped F-15E to a PESA equipped Su-30M

    F-15 has fractionally faster max-speed, has much longer radar range and thats about it. The extra radar range is really useless since both will detect each other at ranges way outside the missile range.

    Su-30M has faster, longer ranging (R-27ET/ER/EP) missiles, IRST that can be used like a radar for IR guided missiles, longer range, higher maneuverability, pitch rates.

    Questions?

  • @klin1klinom Depends on what you jam. Contemporary radars are harder to jam but the data-link to missile or radar of a missile is much simpler to jam especially by the modern jamming pod that uses DRFM technology and has ESA to direct the jamming signals. Russians use Sorbtsia-S L-005 pods designed to "cross-eye" jam in both front and rear hemi-spheres so jamming is done from 2 directions by one plane. However the smart missiles have passive modes which use the very jamming for guidance (R-27EP)

  • @mrbluemagik1 94% IR reduction? please give me the source. IR is IMPOSSIBLE to meaningfully reduce as the F-119 engines hot end has temperature of at least 1600 degrees C. To use your numbers then the exhaust temp becomes 96 degrees C. I tell you as an aircraft tech - your figure of 94% is a load of bull. Plume of hot gas can be seen whether you like it or not. OLS-30 can see such plume from approx 30km. The moment AB is lit then that grows to much bigger range.

    Cobra maneuver breaks radar lock

  • @Spetsnazovets correct plume can be spotted, but F 22 and other newer engines are able to use supercruise, a term for speed of mach1.82, 1,963km/h for sustained times and 30% less fuel is needed, with onboard computers that are classifide,inferior radars are useless, usa also has e.m.p technology wich has been in service for at least 10 years.ir detection works but missiles cant find the source of heat. skin of F22 can also be applied on other jets making them 30 to 40 % undetechtable.

  • @mrbluemagik1 When plane goes supersonic, the sonic booms are very hot and are huge flashes to IR detectors. Also from what range are IR seekers meant to lock on? from 30km any missile will see the plume. Especially modern seekers. Once Archer/AIM-9X/Python5/ASRAAM and alike are launched they WILL NOT miss. As for BVR missiles with IR they are data-link guided until within the 15-20km range and then IR guidance kicks in.

    EMP has to be directed to avoid frying own electronics. 10 years? source?

  • @Spetsnazovets our best weapon against russia is our way of life and our freedoms as americans.we destroyed your so called empire by inflating the price of crude we loaned you 1 billion dollars in wheat so people would not starve to death our technology is 50 to 100 years ahead of the world from our weapons to our way of life we are better than russia . how many american planes and missiles has russia reversed engineered just to barely keep our pase .

  • @mrbluemagik1 actually only 1 plane was reverse engineered (B-29), AIM-9A was and the rest was all Russian own design. Don't even try to talk about F-111 and Su-24 cos I'll roll you on the spot. T-50 and F-22 are vastly different.

    US has used more then one part of MiG-25 when they got it. They also stole tech of Zaslon radar, T-72B and T-80U MBTs, got a sqn of German MiG-29s

    Russia still has faster missiles(R-27ET/EP/ER), torpedoes (Shkval), ASMs that US can't surpass to this day for 15 years

  • @Spetsnazovets i agree on russian torpedoes, usa is developing scramjet powered missiles for anti ship role.my source is close friends who work for mcdonnell-douglas.RUSSIA also reversed aim-9 sidewinder ,B1 lancer design for t-160, wich is the biggest bomber as you know,im sure.russia has had issues with air to air radar for years ive heard many things you sound well learned on the issue ,but russian gov makes claims it cannot prove,what is your source hope its not russian media.

  • russian army is the best

  • I love this jet!

  • I love Russian airplane! It's best in the all world! Americans make stealth shit. We in SERBIA shutdown B2 and F177!

  • @daxmax31 f 117 used same flight patterns no b2 has ever been shot down, 1 f117 was. eastern europe specially serbia, yugoslavia and albania are shithole countries that are jealous of american way of life

  • @mrbluemagik1 Russia is abut to start prodiction of L-band AESA radars for Flankers that will allow detection of VLO planes at long range while VHF radars on the ground (2-metre-ling wave) can see F-22 without a worry from outside F-22s weapons range and considering Russian use of data-link since 1980s (MiG-31/Su-27/MiG-29), US only started to use it in late-90s early 00s. X-band IRBIS hybrid ESA radars range is a match to APG-77.Once AESA is installed on IRBIS back end then it will beat APG-77

  • This plane forever in my heart

    until the end of my existence

  • anyone know anything about the Music!?!?

  • PPL DO U REALIZE THE SUKHOI IS INLY EDITING OFF OF THE MIG 29! WHICH IS A TYPE OF F15/f/Fa18! U PPL R BLIND! THE F22 HAS THRUST VECTORING +STEALTH. WHAT DOES UR COPIES HAVE? THE f-15 HAS NEVER BEEN SHOT DOWN IN COMBAT! WATCH SOME AMAZING F-15 VIDEOS!!!!!thnx for listening

  • PPL DO U REALIZE THE SUKHOI IS INLY EDITING OFF OF THE MIG 29! WHICH IS A TYPE OF F15/f/Fa18! U PPL R BLIND! THE F22 HAS THRUST VECTORING +STEALTH. WJAT DOES UR COPIES HAVE? THE f-15 HAS NEVER BEEN SHOT DOWN IN COMABT! WATCH SOME AMZING F-15 VIDEOS!!!!!thnx for listening

  • LMAO this stupid plane can maneuver all it wants. Russians are 20 years behind the west and even Kremlin knows it, that's why they are buying 3000 Iveco LMV's, Mistrals, and a ton of other stuff from NATO. Maneuverability is 20th century. Right now it is 2010. F-22 and F-35 make maneuverability irrelevant. And even if it was the best (which it is not) what have the poor Russia people gotten from all this military bullshit? Nothing.

  • @normalais Man you talk some rubbish, Russia has just ordered a load of the PAKFA, russias new 5th gen fighter. The SU-37 costs the russians a fraction of the cost of the F22 and what the russians got for their money was the ability to defend their own country. (Rather invading other peoples) The F22 which is a 20 year old design, despite it's astronomical cost already has avionics and radars that are a generation behind and the F35 sacrificed speed and stealth for lower cost.

  • @andygoth Russia does not invade other countries?? I'm from baltic states, they occupied us for 50 years. And Russia just occupied 25% of Georgia, Armania and Ukraine are now under their control, Kyrgistan as well. They want to control as many other countries as possible.

    And PAKFA won't be ready for 15 years at least.

  • @normalais Yet again..wrong. PAKFA is flying now and is due for delivery in 2016.

    Russia went into South Ossetia which wanted to break away from Georgia and Join Russia as it is populated by Russians, Just like georgia broke away from the Soviet Union in 1990. Strangely Russia didn't fire artillery shells at Georgia when it broke away but Georgia decided to shell Tskhinvali.

  • @andygoth South Ossetia is populated by Russians because they occupied it during Soviet Union. Just like the Baltic States. This is how Russia occupies countries: many russians move to live there (mostly under soviet occupation) and then russia claims (even today) that those territories should belong to them since many russian live there. LMAO.

    And I don't care about the stupid PAKFA. Who gives a shit. Life in Russia sucks and it will continue to suck no matter what stupid plane they have

  • @normalais you stupid or what? Russians have beeen living in Baltics long time before Soviet Union. You need to go to school and learn history.

  • @4CaHeK who gives a shit there won't be any country in the baltics with russian as an official language. get it stupid russkies? and chinese lived in siberia looong ago. let me know when you make chinese an official language in russia and/or hand siberia over to china

  • @normalais Hah! stupid are you, because you dont know anything about history.

  • @4CaHeK Yeah I do. I know russians are full of shit and a bunch of murderous barbarians.

  • @normalais ...as for the Americans, they use soyuz rockets to fly to thier space stations.Ring any bell dear friend??u from the baltics// as an external point of view i would suggest align with the bear in her glory.Dont resist her, cause she cannot be stopped.The world knows this very well, u know it very well too?the nato will not come to fight in a direct conflict-PERIOD GEORGIA,after all they are hyped up and not real soldiers..with love from another part of the world.

  • life in russia sucks??really?? have never been there mate..so i dont know..but this is a forum for planes..FGFA..another joint development of the Indians and Russians have reached completion, induction into the IAF in 2 yrs, rumor is that it beats any american toy by a huge margin. Have to wait and watch

  • @MegaServantofgod HUh? What? Nobody cares. Russia will never fight America because it knows it would lose. NATO would wipe russia off the face of the earth. Even russian government knows this.

    There is a much higher chance Russia will become a member of NATO, then there is a chance that Russia will fight NATO

  • @normalais RUssia is a very untrustworthy country,They wouldnt be a NATO ally ever.

  • @normalais lol how do you think a plane evades missiles ? with maneuvaribility :D :D it's called momentum exhaust - a rocket looses it's speed because the plane changes it's direction fast. the missiles's calculation of trajectory's. if a plane flies in 90 degrees infront, the rocket you fire will fly 45 degrees to left or right to catch up the plane's vector. if a plane maneuvers the missile goes in intensive Gs thus lowering it's speed eventually and falling -> it's called missile evasion...

  • @normalais the long range missiles gain speed untill they use all their fuel so they end up with like 5000km/h but when the fuel ends they use the momentum left, which is not in a small range. when a plane does a certain type of evasion maneuver the missile goes nuts from left to right and up and down it even goes in to the ground if a plane dives hard -> simply inefective against skilled pilots :D so dogfights are still in use a lot today.. good luck with your tin cans :D

  • @Cnupoc who gives a shit russia sucks. russian won]t fight nato anyways cuz they don't have the balls or because they want a good relationship with nato now

  • @normalais LOL

  • @winky4u Russia gave USA $100 Billion from fall 2008 to fall 2009. Google "Россия – стратегический инвестор Америки" and look it up. Russia will never fight NATO.

  • @normalais Are you one of the Kasparov's schizophrenics? Move on kiddo, Russians are often passive and don't respond to bullshit, which gave you a false sense of confidence, but you can't even comprehend how ridiculous you sound to the westerners - you might as well talk about aliens or NWO and tell them to google for that, moron. And yes Russia will never fight NATO, because NATO won't do that as well - Russians made sure of that by making relationship with EU too mutually beneficial to sever.

  • @klin1klinom Russia is a failed empire. But as long as you keep acting like an empire your people will not prosper. It is that simple. The West learned that a looong time ago already.

  • @normalais Russia is a failed empire? Thats coming from a person whose country's foreign debt is well over 13 trillion dollars. US is more of an aggressive empire. Iraq 2003 anyone? Afghanistan in 2001? And now US is negotiating with Taliban - the very people believed to be hiding Osama Bin Laden. US is not far from collapse itself. How are US going to pay 13 trillion back? Russia has MUCH MUCH lower debt.

  • @Spetsnazovets blah blah you've had 2 empires fall apart in the last 90 years. And your quality of life is barely better than in Africa.

    I'll take America with all it's debt over piece of shit russian failed empire.

  • @normalais US is a young country. It will go through stages. And it WILL eventually have to either repay its debt (possible) or will start a few more wars against other countries but ultimately the world will turn away from US. USA is all about egoism and money while Russia is much deeper then such pathetic values. Your brain is too pathetic to EVER grasp what Russia is allabout and US will never try to hit Russia as it can and will hit back much harder.

    All you can do is insult. Typical

  • @Spetsnazovets hahahaha yeah right my brain just can't grasp what you totalitarian gopniks are all about. And NATO military budget is $1,1 Trillion a year and NATO countries have 800 million people. Russia will hit back harder? Good luck with that.

    ps. Debt doesn't really matter. US debt as percentage of GDP is half of what it is in Japan.

  • @normalais russia gets big revenue from natural gas sales to europe also crude russia attacking europe is suicide for russian economy.russia cant control rebels in cheytsnia,how can they master all of europe ,no way .i agree with you.

  • @mrbluemagik1 What happens today in Chechnya is that Chechens are sorting it out themselves. Terrorists there and US can't control terrorists in Iraq. Russia doesn't need to control Europe completely. They'll simply make it an impotent military force incapable of fighting by destroying its air power on the ground. European SAM belts have plenty of holes. Europe knows all that and simply will make sure war NEVER starts. Russia will never start the war first. Its more US style of preventive strike

  • @normalais Easy done. Russian MRBMs with cluster munitions take out Airfields in Europe in case of NATO attack, Russian RSZO Smerch outranges MLRS by more then double, Russian tanks fire missiles and immobolize opponent tanks, S-300PM/VM with ESA radars are proven vastly superior to MIM-104, VHF (NOT X-band) AESA radars can see F-22 and can data-link with fighters to swarm F-22s as well as take them out with S-300 missiles. US Navy? Tu-22M3, Tu-95 use anti-ship missiles that beat all defenses

  • @normalais and THAT had been acknowleged by US that Russian anti-ship missiles are unrivalled and too fast for US defences to stop. They also maneuver at terminal stages hence MUCH harder to lock onto and fire at. Those'd be fired from WAY outside US ships weapons range.

    Russian SAMs are made to kill BMs and CMs so a plane is not a problem.

    totalitarian? US simply brainwashes the population today. known fact. Russia has democracy too you know. They simply prefer a strong leader.

  • @Spetsnazovets Russia is a totalitarian state. Always has been and always will be. And who cares about your stupid missiles? Are russian people living a good life because of it? NO.

  • @normalais its 2010 they have democracy now

  • @tadanorm nah. They don't. Hopefully by 2110 they will.

  • @normalais Ummm Whats democracy? US style of "choose between 2 parties"? The only difference is foreign policy since US is ran by corporations anyway and some laws against criminals. I live in Australia and we have same model. It sucks big time. Everyone I know went to vote for Putin and likes his style. How is Russia not democratic? They have their own model. Stop cramming your shit down other countries and peoples throat

  • @Spetsnazovets USA sucks but Russia sucks even more. Russia is a anti-human totalitarian dictatorship. Always has been. Probably always will be.

  • @Spetsnazovets USA sucks, I hate USA. I wish Bush, Cheney etc were put in prison. But Russian anti-humanity totalitarian dictatorship sucks even more. And unlike brainwashed fanatical russians, I can admit that USA government are criminals. I'm not defending them.

  • @normalais You are confusing Russia with USSR when it was under rule of Communist party. Today there are plenty of people criticising the political leadership and nobody seems to be killing anyone for that. Murder of that reporter Politkovskaya? She stepped onto SO many toes of SO many criminals and associated people that its a much larger chance she got killed by mafia then government Anti-humanitarian? In what way? Lets hear it.