we need to arm the anti whaling fleet, anti ship missiles would be nice....after sinking a couple of those slopes ships maybe they will get the message....oh yeah, we were just testing these missile systems as research.....
Japanese Fishermen: I hope we can catch a whale soon, so I can return from this voyage and make some money to feed my family.
Anti-whalers: I hope we can stop those japs from catching a whale soon, so we can get good publicity and add another 5 million dollar batman boat to our fleet of anti-whaling action heroes.
@kolitos32 Japan lost commercial whaling. It is only research whaling now. Then,did you say that Japan didn't begin commercial whaling again, so Japan had the earthquake? Yah, Japan should begin that.
Intelligence is low and the people with a brain severer than a monkey who are inferior also in the power of understanding have not got sense of superiority. Only the racial discrimination which is merely meaningless comforts them. They are pitiful people.
It's hilarious reading "tojos" comments in "engrish". The japanese race are a shameful bunch of short, moonfaced, almond eyed little monkeys whose imperial ambitions almost left their country and people nuked off the map, would not have been any great loss if it had been to be honest...........
You know whats hilarious? They later called to the whaling ship they just tried to fuck over and asked for help. The whalers replied with basically "Fuck you!", this made the sea shitheads angry and made them question the whalers moral ethics even further. But when the whalers decided to help the sea ASSHOLES said for them to stay away or else......what retards.
It seems that you cannot understand even the meaning that a whale is the same as a cow, like the human being with same white and black person. There is blame to a foreign country without a meaning only by racial discrimination.
@vaxiawval Unlike you, Japanese people are intellectual. What you who eat a foolish cow and pig are proud of is only muscles. I'll teach you one truth one more. There are some kinds of whale. One is a Minke whale which Japan mainly gets in the antarctic sea . Japan catches only 400 animals in there every year.
@vaxiawval However, the Minke whale of about 100,000 animals inhabits the antarctic sea. IWC tells Japan can take 2000 animals per year. And the propagative power of a Minke whale is strong and adult's scalpel get pregnant every year. However, there is the kind near extinction of whale. It is a bowhead whale. The Inuit is catching that whale of U.S.. The blame to your Japan is a mistake. You should apologize for the impoliteness to us.
A whale is the same animal as a cow or a pig. A whale is not man. Although there are many living things wiser than a whale, it does not have a meaning, when thinking as man's food. Although there were many black persons wiser than a white, there was a time which discriminated against them in your country.
@amtriplekkk why do you think there is conservation work done on dolphins and whales and not on pigs and cows? the Japanese are killing more than they should, in that i don't mean more than the public demands (ppl never get enough), but more than the fishing limit, causing it impossible to maintain a healthy whale population to sustain the species, affecting the ecosystem. but most importantly, they are not humane when slaughtering these highly intelligent animals either, as shown in The Cove.
@Ozzyjac Are you fucking kidding me? You clearly have no-idea what your talking about. One reason i know this is the ship that was rammed wasnt called "Sea Shepard" it was called the "Ady Gil" and if you watch the full video the japanese harpoon ship took care TO hit them (they took a sharp turn into their boat).
@Piezipx actually no, and the ady gil was in violation of international law. spend some time in the coast guard and you'll see the ady gil had no right to be that close to a ship with the draft of the japanese ship
@1killerterminator bullshit the japs went all through china raping and killing whole villages. more importantly they are killing whales in Australian waters. If you have ever seen a whale or been close to one you'ld understand. tool
@terrybra RETARD, go learn before talking shit. no one is killing whales in "Australian Waters" any ships that trespass will be arrested by the coast guard or the navy. Also Japan did not go through China raping and killing whole villages. There was a WAR, and Japan killed a load of Chinese military.
I only know of Aboriginees in Australia being victims of genocide. as well as American Indians and Blacks forced into slavery. you can not compare anything in the history of Japan to that shit
Feb. 6 2009: "A boat with anti-whaling activists collides with a japanese whaling vessel in the Antarctic Ocean. No one was injured. Japan is condemning the clash, calling it unforgivable."
Jan. 6 2010: "A japanese whaling vessel collided with the anti-whaling powerboat Ady Gil. The vessel sunk. There was one injury reported. The japanese officials have since repeatedly refused to cooperate with investigations over this collision."
@info145 . im that guy you blocked. ok so can you tell me how the FBI labeled them ecoterrorist? so if what the japanese whalers are doing is illeagle. what laws are they brakeing??? an what drones are you talking about??
The Sea Shepards worth our respect. We need people who are willing to stand up and fight for the rights of innocent dolphins and whales.
I personally really appreciate what the Sea Shepherds are doing and i'm sure there are many others who are proud of what they do, so i hope they'll KEEP IT UP! Good for them! :)
@dolphin1992108 saving innocent dolphins and whales? lol think about the innocent little piggy next time you eat, and don't forget to think about all the innocent lettuce and innocent tomatoes too brutally bitten into and forced into the stomach full of acid. oh noooo lol
dolphins KILL fish to live. think of all the poor innocent fish being killed by dolphins lol
@Thegus0 you just pointed out the difference between animals and humans. the Japanese are killing dolphins and whales for PROFIT, the meat is not their main concern and they're killing EXCESSIVELY (more than necessary) to maximize their benefit. Animals, however, kill for SURVIVAL (they never kill more than they can eat). That's nature, it's also natural and not wrong for us to consume animals for food, again for survival, (although some humans do better and become vegetarians)
@dolphin1992108 difference between animals and humans? humans are animals and a part of nature.
The Japanese whaling is under quota and so as their entire fisheries industry. there is strict government control of rules and regulations. so you are very wrong when you say Japan is killing excessively. why don't you go throw bottles of acid and denounce 3 star restaurants for being "excessive" lol
@Thegus0 i don't care if the Japanese set a "quota" for whaling, whales have low reproduction rates and it's easy for them to become extinct (unlike pigs/cows which are abundant and ppl captive breed). Clearly the whalers and their way of making profit are causing whale populations to decline rapidly.
@dolphin1992108 No the quota is set by the IWC and every study shows that Whale population is rising. So the argument that Whales are endangered does not work.
@Thegus0 well human populations are rising, we're up to 7billion now, we're crowding up the Earth and using up its resources. why don't you go out and kill some humans? we have no right to control the population of any one species in the wild, nature never did us any harm, then why are you so against conservation work?
@Thegus0 just because whale numbers are rising does not mean their not endangerd, their still only less than 10% of their original population you stupid peice of shit. Also the quota set by the IWC is not an international agrement its a self proclaimed quota by the Japs.
@Thegus0 well human populations are rising, we're up to 7billion now, we're crowding up the Earth and using up its resources. why don't you go out and kill some humans? we have no right to control the population of any one species in the wild, nature never did us any harm, then why are you so against conservation work?
It is their purpose to advertize a hero to TV. Although a whale and a dolphin will die or live, but they are not caring. Being smartly reflected in TV is only his concerns. Talking by Tv has only hypocrisy and lie. The foolish thing which looks for a hero misunderstands them.
The fellow who believes Watson's lie is foolish. Is a liar a hero in your country? It is surprise. He is interested in only the money instead of a whale or a dolphin. Because, as for the performance of anti-whaling, donations gather. Isn't it unnecessary of a style exaggerated of their ship to oppose the whaling ship?
@Thegus0 or jusst disintegrate the EU part of nato and form the Washington pace, similar to that of the Warsaw pact of the USSR,.......................THEN bomb the shit off the aussies, muhahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@cliffy84 so is invading . so why does no one support al qaeda ? , walling is wrong , but they are attacking the ships , thats illigal one day the japs will say fuck this calling the japanease navy and they are gonna get fucked up
@alesanarocksmexico the japs wont do a dam thing because they arnt going to start an international dispute over something that most of the world disagrees with. whaling should be banned fullstop.
@mdredheadguy1979 dipshit. grow some brains. are we talking about humans going around killing humans? - or are we talking about banning people from hunting whale populations? remove the penis from your forehead pal. Japs and the rest of them should be banned from hunting whale - especially the amount they are allowed to get away with. sea shephard is out there trying to stop this happening. the same as when peacekeepers go to aid a countrys population that is being attacked by militants etc
@cliffy84 My last post was referring to the murder of an abortion doctor while he was attending church. My point was that Scott Roeder shot Dr. George Tiller, because he believed that the ends justify the means. It was not meant as an insult and maybe I should have explained a little more, however that does not justify your petty insults. You don't need to respond as I will no longer continue to converse with someone who has such little maturity as what you have demonstrated.
@cliffy84 you said: " that clearly has nothing to do with the video you are posting a comment on." Yes it does. I started this hole thing by asking you if the ends justify the means. You said yes. My next two posts were an attempt to point out how that kind of thinking can go wrong, that's why I brought up the murder because the "pro-life" guy believed the same as you! So maybe your the one who should "Think before you speak in the future mate." Now do you get it?
@mdredheadguy1979 couldnt help yourself could you.? Pal, this video is about Whaling and the prevention of, so in this respect the end does justify the means. obviously with your example it doesnt. a stupid comparison mate, two completely different situations. i dont have the same outlook as that 'prolife' lad your talking about, your talking about an extremeist nutcase who is obviously using the bible to justify his wrong doings. so like i said - two completely different scenarios.
@cliffy84 and your using whales to justify SS wrong doings. I believe a good rule of thumb is: if what your going to do will break the law, then don't do it. SS and pro-life both believe that "the ends justify the means". In both cases, they believe that what THEY are doing is right. However, both cases are nothing more then an excuse to justify breaking the law. So in the end, SS is = to the pro-life extremist nutcase. End of story.
@cliffy84 Wow, this is just what I have come to expect of all of "activist" types. You always have to resort to petty insults, because you can't figure out how to have a discussion like a mature adult.
@packer041 the smaller boat is more maneuverable than the larger whaling ship... the boat is clearly solely at fault... especially when you consider the captain has come out and said that he did it deliberately because Sea Shepherd ordered him to do so
@luccaskunk You said: "he did it deliberately because Sea Shepherd ordered him to do so". Really? I have not heard that. Is there a video of it on youtube?
@mdredheadguy1979 Yes, actually. there is a video watch?v=klSkgfXqIqA of course it's not just on YouTube... That video is a recording of a mainstream news broadcast talking about it.
@xAthrun That's bullshit. The whaling ship is a much larger vessel than the Ady Gil was. Larger vessels are, by a matter of physics, less maneuverable and even slower. Your response belies a complete lack of even the most basic grasp of physics.
From Newton's Laws of Motion "an object in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted on by an equal and opposite force." It takes more energy to make them change their direction or speed than it does a smaller vessel.
@xAthrun To calculate the amount of force required to stop a vessel, it's basically the speed of the vessel times it's mass minus the amount of force created by the drag of the water and air. Then you can figure out how long it will take for it to simply stop by calculating how much force is exerted by the engine. You'll find the engines of large vessels exert far less force per mass of the vessel than the engines of a smaller vessel.
@xAthrun If the engines didn't exert far less force per mass of the vessel, then due to inertia and momentum, the vessels would crunch like tin cans on the foreheads of rednecks every time they turn the engine on.
Now please. Before you argue, go to your local harbor. Ask the harbor master which type of ship is easier to change it's direction or speed. A tiny, motorized longboat like the Ady Gil or a factory ship such as the ones employed by Japanese so called "researchers".
@xAthrun seriously? you're arguing that because "these videos" show turns and "those videos" show turns of a different rate that you think both ships were turning at their most? Well gee, then I suppose we could take security footage of people walking down the street. See that car that just turned? Yeah, it's more maneuverable than all those people who just walk straight and you never see them turn much at all.
Get real. A factory ship is not going to be as maneuverable as a 14' trimaran.
@xAthrun Do you even know what close haul means? Or Luffing? Do you know how to tell the difference between a ship and a boat? How about historically? Is a brig a boat, a ship, or a place on a boat or a ship? Do you know what the difference is between a bridge and a poop deck? Seriously, if you did know what you were talking about, you wouldn't say that a 14 foot trimaran is less maneuverable or slower than a 231 foot factory ship. Their performance is not comparable, not even scaled.
@xAthrun If their performance scaled AT ALL, you would find that the MV Shōnan Maru 2, being 16.5 times longer than the Adi Gil, would be capable of 825 knots which is roughly equivilent to Mach 1.2... Now if the Japanese had super sonic whaling vessels, I don't think Sea Shepherd would even be able to pester them.
To use some of your own words 'No, seriously now' go to a harbor, ask a harbor master which has right of way, a 14 foot trimaran or a 231 foot factory ship.
@xAthrun Don't get me wrong now, I'm all for saving the whales, but Sea Shepherd's theatrics and aggressive antics can't even save face, let alone the whales.
They're actually even hypocritical... They claim to be vegans but fuel the biodiesel engines of their vessels with animal fat. As ridiculous as vegans are, Sea Shepherd can't even keep their rhetoric straight.
@luccaskunk The Sea Shepherds aren't vegans. I haven't heard them claim it either.
Also: Sea Shepherd's current 'aggressiveness' is nothing compared to what they've done in the past.
If you've seen videos, you might have noticed the names on the sides of the Steve Irwin. (Such as the Sierra.) Those are names of ships that the Sea Shepherds have either sunk or rammed.
@xAthrun Not Vegan? Seriously? So not only do you not do your homework regarding the maneuverability of vessels, but you don't even do your homework about Sea Shepherd, then you come and tell me that I'm a moron?
I've got their web page open right now. Paul Watson (the head of Sea Shepherd) saying "My ships are vegan" It seriously doesn't get any more straight forward than that.
@xAthrun My 8 year old nephew is over and I said to him "Hey, you know that show Whale Wars?" he goes "yeah" I said "Did you know that the guy who runs Sea Shepherd, the people who are trying to save the whales on that show, that he says their ships are vegan?" He asked "what's vegan?" I said "vegan means no animal stuff like meat, milk, or leather" He asked "So the people saving the whales don't eat at McDonalds?" My 8 year old nephew gets it. Why don't you?
@xAthrun Yeah, you know what a vegan is, and you have poor reading comprehension. I had to explain vegans to my newphew, but he didn't think that "my ships are vegan" refers to the ships, he thought it refers to the crew of the ships. Again, why do I even have to explain this to you? I feel like I'm talking to a 3 year old.
@xAthrun Sorry but bio-diesel only means the fuel came from biological sources other than "dead dinosaur based petroleum". The Ady Gil for instance was very specifically fueled with a combination of vegetable oil and animal fat. Maybe you missed the part where I said they use animal fat. The full quote from Watson is "My ships are vegan because we are conservationists. There are simply not enough fish in the sea to continue to feed the ever expanding populations of humanity."
@xAthrun But of course you didn't even bother looking up the quote before responding to it, which just goes back to your lack of research. It seems to me that you came into this with poorly researched, preconceived notions and you haven't bothered looking things up even when I've repeatedly told you to go and seek the information before arguing. I'm not here to educate you and you have no reason to believe what I say. Go out there and find out for yourself instead of arguing.
@xAthrun And yes I'm aware of the Farley Mowat and most of their other ships. I refuse to call it the "Steve Irwin" because I doubt he'd ever have supported them if he knew that they're deceitful misanthropes.
@xAthrun Really? You looked it up did you? Seriously? Because I find that hard to believe. Punching the full quote into Google is going to pop up a page titled "Frequently Asked Questions" on their official webpage.
@xAthrun Also ask the harbor master which has right of way: a motorized long boat or a factory ship.
And yes I know the Ady Gil was a trimaran, doesn't change the fact that it falls into the same size classification as a long boat. And if you even THINK of arguing that the Ady Gil was a sailing vessel and that it didn't have a motor. Think again. The thing had a pair of 540 horsepower Cummins Mercruiser engines.
@luccaskunk .. Uh, what? I said absolutely nothing about the Ady Gil being a sailing vessel. I know it was a trimaran. I know it had a motor.
I don't see the point in stating any of that.
It seems you believe I don't actually know anything I'm talking about.
Also: The thought of saying that the Ady Gil had no motor, and that it was a sailing vessel, didn't even cross my mind. I thought it was quite sad that the million dollar vessel was destroyed.
The rest of the civilized world should demand an end to this whaling crap by the japanese in recognition of all the help they're receiving after the earthquake/tsunami
The guy who runs Sea Shepherd (Paul Watson) is Canadian, fyi.
I really feel bad for the Japanese. People really really understand the economic reasons for whaling -- e.g.-They're an island nation and being a bit more self-sufficient would go a long way towards decreasing the cost of living for the average person in Japan.
@mikeb2big yeah im with you on that one mate. at least alot of countries are banning the sale of whale meat so one day it shouldnt be as big a market. same goes for poaching endangered species... when will people learn
even if the Sea Shepards were at fault for the collision, the Japanese would still be facing immense pressure from other countries to stop their whaling. Australia and New Zealand have already condemned Japan's activities, and multiple other countries aren't far behind.
Of course it polluted the ocean but you tree huggers chose to ignore those pesky FACTS and bethune should be CRIMINALLY charged for what he did. It was blatantly obvious the addy intentionally tried to steer in front of the bigger vessel creating an extremely dangerous situation causing it to be struck. It was a shame the occupants of the addy didn't go down with the ship,, they are nothing more than terrorist.
God why are people so damn racist, not all Japanese are pro-whaling so don't act that they are all bad. Besides the sea shepards crew are a bunch of lying assholes. They could have moved out of the way but chose not to. I am 1000% against whaling but come on, what the sea shepards crew did would be like if I ran in front of a speeding bus and then blamed the bus driver for me getting hit.
@VNSki, hey dumbshit, It wasn't a joke. The damn Atom bomb was an abuse of power used twice and the weapon's fall-out has damaged many generations. Apparently it was a necessary evil. Look at how the world is today. The fiberglass Sea Shepherd shouldn't have been out there alone when trying to do something humanitarian. Both sides should have been out there preventing illegal activity.
They were stationary at the time? Then what is the Ady Gil prop wash indicating they were powering forward for 7 seconds before the collision into the SMs path? Liar.
@MaguireWard First, the activist boat wasn't stationary. It wasn't moving at a high rate of speed, but it wasn't just sitting there bobbing up and down. Plus it also accelerated forward (into the Japanese ship) at a high rate about 4 seconds before the collision.
As for the Japanese (Jap is a derogatory term used by racists and bigots) ship turning, you have to know the entire issue to understand why the japanese ship turned the way it did. Apparently you don't know the entire issue.
@USDAChuckSteak it was completely stationary, captain and crew were ON TOP of the boat the entire time. The only person that was in the boat (&injured) at the time was a camera man for their tv show and had no knowledge of how to even run the boat. If you watch the video from their tv show it shows about 5 minutes longer footage than this, they're sitting relaxing on the boat waiting to refuel from their other ship... then all sudden japanese boat heads towards them and turns sharply into them.
@YourLoveLetter It was not stationary. If you watch the footage from the SM#2 you can see cavitation coming from the aft of the AG. That cavitation is from the AG's props turning. If the props are turning the boat is NOT stationary. It may not have been going "fast" but is was FAR from stationary. The was a crew member at the helm and it was not a camera man.
On top of this New Zealand released an official report and deemed BOTH ships at fault. Both.
@USDAChuckSteak There was no movement from the small boat, if there was it was so minuscule that cameras couldn't even capture it lol. As opposed to the japanese ship which clearly shows a sharp direct fast turn. As far as propellers being active, you know boats can run in neutral which specifically keeps them from drifting. If you are waiting for a ship and relaxing on TOP of your boat the most you would be doing is running it in neutral anyways, to keep your position.
@YourLoveLetter There is clearly movement from the Ady Gil. If you can't see that then you are biased. Pete B. has already confirmed that the engines were in idle with the drives engaged which gave the Ady forward momentum. All be it slight. Then a few seconds before the collision the Ady Gil throttles up and shootf forward right into the SM#2. Who's fault? Both ships are at fault. If you can't see the wrongs BOTH ships did then you are a simple propaganda whore.
Japan boat hit the Ady Gil on purpose. From a different view you can see the Japanese boat turn into their direction. Also, they japanese boat crew did not respond to calls of helping the men thrown in the water.
@zranch 1. The Japanese ship turned because this is what it had done all teh previous time the smaller boat had illegally crossed it's bow. The Japanese ship didn't realize the small boat had throttled back until to late. This is why you see the Japanese ship turn towards then away.
2. The Japanese ship was also int eh collision and their priority is vwerifying the damage to their ship. There were other ship to respond. The only SSCS ship to report a mayday was the barker and it wasn't hurt.
@Scorpion85629 you say things like that, and think it's funny and shit. it wouldn't be funny if you've been hit by a nuke dumbfuck. i don't want to argue with dumbasses like you because it's a waste of time, but what you said is no disturbing,even though im not jap.
we need to arm the anti whaling fleet, anti ship missiles would be nice....after sinking a couple of those slopes ships maybe they will get the message....oh yeah, we were just testing these missile systems as research.....
offroad03TJ 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
japanese whalers stinks more badly than butyric acid.i hope you all ends up at the bottom of the sea.
laikaimall 2 weeks ago
There doing the right thing I think so. Helping the Helpless<3
ashleybear3031 2 weeks ago 2
Japanese Fishermen: I hope we can catch a whale soon, so I can return from this voyage and make some money to feed my family.
Anti-whalers: I hope we can stop those japs from catching a whale soon, so we can get good publicity and add another 5 million dollar batman boat to our fleet of anti-whaling action heroes.
raza121 3 weeks ago
fuck japan
bakedzitibrah 1 month ago
another earth quake. and we will be studying the japanese under the sea...THATS KARMA!!!
GOD is not sleeping,,,see what already happened to them,earthquake,tsunamis,,,if they dont stop....just wait for KARMA to come BIG TIME JAPAN.!!!!
kolitos32 1 month ago
@kolitos32 Japan lost commercial whaling. It is only research whaling now. Then,did you say that Japan didn't begin commercial whaling again, so Japan had the earthquake? Yah, Japan should begin that.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
@kolitos32 You offend me.
I'm Atheist.
Jerk.
hellcatdave1 3 weeks ago
@kolitos32 eisai malakas
raza121 3 weeks ago
@kolitos32 The earthquake has been expected for over 50 years. It's a natural thing.
TheNinjanordundor 2 days ago
Intelligence is low and the people with a brain severer than a monkey who are inferior also in the power of understanding have not got sense of superiority. Only the racial discrimination which is merely meaningless comforts them. They are pitiful people.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
It's hilarious reading "tojos" comments in "engrish". The japanese race are a shameful bunch of short, moonfaced, almond eyed little monkeys whose imperial ambitions almost left their country and people nuked off the map, would not have been any great loss if it had been to be honest...........
Fitzee6 1 month ago
they just dont care about the sea world and their not studying the whales
raider2115 1 month ago
@SSCS If Japanese offended, they are more dreadful than the terrorism of Iraq.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
Comment removed
vaxiawval 1 month ago
You know whats hilarious? They later called to the whaling ship they just tried to fuck over and asked for help. The whalers replied with basically "Fuck you!", this made the sea shitheads angry and made them question the whalers moral ethics even further. But when the whalers decided to help the sea ASSHOLES said for them to stay away or else......what retards.
AVGN4life1 1 month ago
too bad none of them died.
pos sheperd morons deserve to be beaten bloody and left in the ocean with the worthless blob whales.
theraVen27 1 month ago
LOL it was not stationary and why were they there in the first place XD shepard's on damn fault
Trollingwithmyhomies 1 month ago
Hahaha fuck you sea shepherd, fuck you.
tom2034 1 month ago
i hate the japanese whalefleet!!!
mcfreerunning1 2 months ago
im glad that ship got hit. it looks like a god damn whale
ITSGLENN83 2 months ago
BANZAI! Boom, lmao!
mikethebassguy 2 months ago
It seems that you cannot understand even the meaning that a whale is the same as a cow, like the human being with same white and black person. There is blame to a foreign country without a meaning only by racial discrimination.
D2ooSAX 2 months ago
@D2ooSAX
Cows are no way near to extinction and are bred, not wild, even a savage jap brain should be able to see the difference
vaxiawval 1 month ago
@vaxiawval Unlike you, Japanese people are intellectual. What you who eat a foolish cow and pig are proud of is only muscles. I'll teach you one truth one more. There are some kinds of whale. One is a Minke whale which Japan mainly gets in the antarctic sea . Japan catches only 400 animals in there every year.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
@vaxiawval However, the Minke whale of about 100,000 animals inhabits the antarctic sea. IWC tells Japan can take 2000 animals per year. And the propagative power of a Minke whale is strong and adult's scalpel get pregnant every year. However, there is the kind near extinction of whale. It is a bowhead whale. The Inuit is catching that whale of U.S.. The blame to your Japan is a mistake. You should apologize for the impoliteness to us.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
@vaxiawval SS is an offender. Believing and telling their lie is helping an offender.
D2ooSAX 1 month ago
A whale is the same animal as a cow or a pig. A whale is not man. Although there are many living things wiser than a whale, it does not have a meaning, when thinking as man's food. Although there were many black persons wiser than a white, there was a time which discriminated against them in your country.
D2ooSAX 2 months ago
Sea Shepherd must go hell.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee6 2 months ago 2
This is the brutal act of Japs killers whales.
mitkovimpela 2 months ago
The sea sheperd is lying. The Japanese ship radioed asking if the boat wanted help, but the stupid anti-whaling people refused
AlohaBiatch 3 months ago
@amtriplekkk why do you think there is conservation work done on dolphins and whales and not on pigs and cows? the Japanese are killing more than they should, in that i don't mean more than the public demands (ppl never get enough), but more than the fishing limit, causing it impossible to maintain a healthy whale population to sustain the species, affecting the ecosystem. but most importantly, they are not humane when slaughtering these highly intelligent animals either, as shown in The Cove.
dolphin1992108 3 months ago
Comment removed
dolphin1992108 3 months ago
The sea Shepherd is lyling they were sailing in front of the japanese and some how hoping to stop them...
stupid assholes.
Ozzyjac 4 months ago
@Ozzyjac Are you fucking kidding me? You clearly have no-idea what your talking about. One reason i know this is the ship that was rammed wasnt called "Sea Shepard" it was called the "Ady Gil" and if you watch the full video the japanese harpoon ship took care TO hit them (they took a sharp turn into their boat).
Piezipx 3 months ago
@Piezipx actually no, and the ady gil was in violation of international law. spend some time in the coast guard and you'll see the ady gil had no right to be that close to a ship with the draft of the japanese ship
scottbaioisdead 3 months ago
@scottbaioisdead That wasnt my point.
Piezipx 3 months ago
@1killerterminator bullshit the japs went all through china raping and killing whole villages. more importantly they are killing whales in Australian waters. If you have ever seen a whale or been close to one you'ld understand. tool
terrybra 4 months ago
@terrybra RETARD, go learn before talking shit. no one is killing whales in "Australian Waters" any ships that trespass will be arrested by the coast guard or the navy. Also Japan did not go through China raping and killing whole villages. There was a WAR, and Japan killed a load of Chinese military.
I only know of Aboriginees in Australia being victims of genocide. as well as American Indians and Blacks forced into slavery. you can not compare anything in the history of Japan to that shit
Thegus0 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the japanese need to stop trying to be the good guys
suburbanrc1 5 months ago
the japanese LIE
nsdtr01 5 months ago
Guess that will teach them to not run in front of whaling ships! "I rode my bike in front of a tractor trailer and it hit me. Waaaaa." Genius!
Sauls2286 5 months ago
Put into perspective:
Feb. 6 2009: "A boat with anti-whaling activists collides with a japanese whaling vessel in the Antarctic Ocean. No one was injured. Japan is condemning the clash, calling it unforgivable."
Jan. 6 2010: "A japanese whaling vessel collided with the anti-whaling powerboat Ady Gil. The vessel sunk. There was one injury reported. The japanese officials have since repeatedly refused to cooperate with investigations over this collision."
Does anyone smell a rat?
info145 5 months ago
@info145 . im that guy you blocked. ok so can you tell me how the FBI labeled them ecoterrorist? so if what the japanese whalers are doing is illeagle. what laws are they brakeing??? an what drones are you talking about??
ITSGLENN83 4 months ago
LOL the batman boat sank ... Protest on the docks with the rest of them.
HPISFBankrupter 5 months ago
The Sea Shepards worth our respect. We need people who are willing to stand up and fight for the rights of innocent dolphins and whales.
I personally really appreciate what the Sea Shepherds are doing and i'm sure there are many others who are proud of what they do, so i hope they'll KEEP IT UP! Good for them! :)
dolphin1992108 5 months ago
@dolphin1992108 saving innocent dolphins and whales? lol think about the innocent little piggy next time you eat, and don't forget to think about all the innocent lettuce and innocent tomatoes too brutally bitten into and forced into the stomach full of acid. oh noooo lol
dolphins KILL fish to live. think of all the poor innocent fish being killed by dolphins lol
Thegus0 4 months ago
@Thegus0 you just pointed out the difference between animals and humans. the Japanese are killing dolphins and whales for PROFIT, the meat is not their main concern and they're killing EXCESSIVELY (more than necessary) to maximize their benefit. Animals, however, kill for SURVIVAL (they never kill more than they can eat). That's nature, it's also natural and not wrong for us to consume animals for food, again for survival, (although some humans do better and become vegetarians)
dolphin1992108 4 months ago
@dolphin1992108 difference between animals and humans? humans are animals and a part of nature.
The Japanese whaling is under quota and so as their entire fisheries industry. there is strict government control of rules and regulations. so you are very wrong when you say Japan is killing excessively. why don't you go throw bottles of acid and denounce 3 star restaurants for being "excessive" lol
Thegus0 4 months ago
@Thegus0 i don't care if the Japanese set a "quota" for whaling, whales have low reproduction rates and it's easy for them to become extinct (unlike pigs/cows which are abundant and ppl captive breed). Clearly the whalers and their way of making profit are causing whale populations to decline rapidly.
dolphin1992108 4 months ago
@dolphin1992108 No the quota is set by the IWC and every study shows that Whale population is rising. So the argument that Whales are endangered does not work.
Thegus0 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thegus0 well human populations are rising, we're up to 7billion now, we're crowding up the Earth and using up its resources. why don't you go out and kill some humans? we have no right to control the population of any one species in the wild, nature never did us any harm, then why are you so against conservation work?
dolphin1992108 3 months ago
@Thegus0 just because whale numbers are rising does not mean their not endangerd, their still only less than 10% of their original population you stupid peice of shit. Also the quota set by the IWC is not an international agrement its a self proclaimed quota by the Japs.
Sam200980 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thegus0 well human populations are rising, we're up to 7billion now, we're crowding up the Earth and using up its resources. why don't you go out and kill some humans? we have no right to control the population of any one species in the wild, nature never did us any harm, then why are you so against conservation work?
dolphin1992108 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is their purpose to advertize a hero to TV. Although a whale and a dolphin will die or live, but they are not caring. Being smartly reflected in TV is only his concerns. Talking by Tv has only hypocrisy and lie. The foolish thing which looks for a hero misunderstands them.
D2ooSAX 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fellow who believes Watson's lie is foolish. Is a liar a hero in your country? It is surprise. He is interested in only the money instead of a whale or a dolphin. Because, as for the performance of anti-whaling, donations gather. Isn't it unnecessary of a style exaggerated of their ship to oppose the whaling ship?
D2ooSAX 5 months ago
sea-shepherd fakes being shot LOL
what dicks.
They are wanted as eco terrorist by the FBI.
Yet the racist Aussies support them.
Australians support terrorists lol. maybe NATO need to bomb australia LOL
Thegus0 6 months ago
@Thegus0 or jusst disintegrate the EU part of nato and form the Washington pace, similar to that of the Warsaw pact of the USSR,.......................THEN bomb the shit off the aussies, muhahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
harris3693 4 months ago
I didn't use Google. I don't like it.
And yes, I DID look for it. On SeaShepherds website, under the Commentary/Editorials tab, under news and media.
I scrolled to the bottom and looked at the list, looking for anything related to veganism or questions.
I'm not stupid, like you seem to believe.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@PissedPlayinPimp Thanks. I was starting to worry I was the only one who sees SS that way.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 you are pal
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 ????
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@cliffy84
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
I support these guys - whaling is wrong
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 so is invading . so why does no one support al qaeda ? , walling is wrong , but they are attacking the ships , thats illigal one day the japs will say fuck this calling the japanease navy and they are gonna get fucked up
alesanarocksmexico 7 months ago
@alesanarocksmexico the japs wont do a dam thing because they arnt going to start an international dispute over something that most of the world disagrees with. whaling should be banned fullstop.
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 One question, do the ends always justify the means?
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 if it means that whales are left to live and flourish the way they are supposed to, then yes.
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 GREAT!! That means I can murder, rape and destroy in the name of "saving lives"!!! Yea, that's logical thinking.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 dipshit. grow some brains. are we talking about humans going around killing humans? - or are we talking about banning people from hunting whale populations? remove the penis from your forehead pal. Japs and the rest of them should be banned from hunting whale - especially the amount they are allowed to get away with. sea shephard is out there trying to stop this happening. the same as when peacekeepers go to aid a countrys population that is being attacked by militants etc
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 My last post was referring to the murder of an abortion doctor while he was attending church. My point was that Scott Roeder shot Dr. George Tiller, because he believed that the ends justify the means. It was not meant as an insult and maybe I should have explained a little more, however that does not justify your petty insults. You don't need to respond as I will no longer continue to converse with someone who has such little maturity as what you have demonstrated.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 that clearly has nothing to do with the video you are posting a comment on. Think before you speak in the future mate.
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 you said: " that clearly has nothing to do with the video you are posting a comment on." Yes it does. I started this hole thing by asking you if the ends justify the means. You said yes. My next two posts were an attempt to point out how that kind of thinking can go wrong, that's why I brought up the murder because the "pro-life" guy believed the same as you! So maybe your the one who should "Think before you speak in the future mate." Now do you get it?
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 couldnt help yourself could you.? Pal, this video is about Whaling and the prevention of, so in this respect the end does justify the means. obviously with your example it doesnt. a stupid comparison mate, two completely different situations. i dont have the same outlook as that 'prolife' lad your talking about, your talking about an extremeist nutcase who is obviously using the bible to justify his wrong doings. so like i said - two completely different scenarios.
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 and your using whales to justify SS wrong doings. I believe a good rule of thumb is: if what your going to do will break the law, then don't do it. SS and pro-life both believe that "the ends justify the means". In both cases, they believe that what THEY are doing is right. However, both cases are nothing more then an excuse to justify breaking the law. So in the end, SS is = to the pro-life extremist nutcase. End of story.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@cliffy84 I DON'T support these guys. Terrorism, no matter the justification, is wrong.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 good for you mate. Whaling countries are TERRORISING the eco system. get that in your ginger nut pal.
cliffy84 7 months ago
@cliffy84 Wow, this is just what I have come to expect of all of "activist" types. You always have to resort to petty insults, because you can't figure out how to have a discussion like a mature adult.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 well dont bother making a dead end argument based on facts that arent relevant to the topic.
cliffy84 7 months ago
accident my ass!
YouWantMeYouCantPay 7 months ago
Sea Shepherd's biggest accomplishment has been making thousands if not millions of people wonder how whale meat tastes.
Pitchblack07 8 months ago
Fuck them japs, they should bloody torpedo them or some shit.
Zonixx06 8 months ago
looks like a boat of hydro thunder
callofduty4fan 8 months ago
Both vessels were clearly moving. Both were at fault. With that said, its funny that the eco-terrorists boat was sunk
packer041 9 months ago
@packer041 the smaller boat is more maneuverable than the larger whaling ship... the boat is clearly solely at fault... especially when you consider the captain has come out and said that he did it deliberately because Sea Shepherd ordered him to do so
luccaskunk 8 months ago 2
@luccaskunk You said: "he did it deliberately because Sea Shepherd ordered him to do so". Really? I have not heard that. Is there a video of it on youtube?
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 Yes, actually. there is a video watch?v=klSkgfXqIqA of course it's not just on YouTube... That video is a recording of a mainstream news broadcast talking about it.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk Thanks. Further proof SS can't be trusted.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@luccaskunk You're a moron.
The whaling boat is actually just as maneuverable as the Ady Gil, if not more so.
P.S. - Pete Bethune (Ady Gil Captain) said he was ordered to sink the boat AFTER the collision.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun That's bullshit. The whaling ship is a much larger vessel than the Ady Gil was. Larger vessels are, by a matter of physics, less maneuverable and even slower. Your response belies a complete lack of even the most basic grasp of physics.
From Newton's Laws of Motion "an object in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted on by an equal and opposite force." It takes more energy to make them change their direction or speed than it does a smaller vessel.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk No. It's not bullshit, actually.
Maybe you should actually watch video of the whaling ships, then spout your shit.
Scaled down, the whaling ship is very close in statistics as the Ady Gil.
P.S. - I know physics. I'm not stupid, like the majority of people who argue and start stuff on Youtube.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun To calculate the amount of force required to stop a vessel, it's basically the speed of the vessel times it's mass minus the amount of force created by the drag of the water and air. Then you can figure out how long it will take for it to simply stop by calculating how much force is exerted by the engine. You'll find the engines of large vessels exert far less force per mass of the vessel than the engines of a smaller vessel.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@xAthrun If the engines didn't exert far less force per mass of the vessel, then due to inertia and momentum, the vessels would crunch like tin cans on the foreheads of rednecks every time they turn the engine on.
Now please. Before you argue, go to your local harbor. Ask the harbor master which type of ship is easier to change it's direction or speed. A tiny, motorized longboat like the Ady Gil or a factory ship such as the ones employed by Japanese so called "researchers".
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk
No, seriously now, go watch film of how quickly the whaling vessels can turn.
Then compare that to some videos of the Ady Gil's turns.
Like I said: Scaled down, very comparable maneuverability statistics.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun seriously? you're arguing that because "these videos" show turns and "those videos" show turns of a different rate that you think both ships were turning at their most? Well gee, then I suppose we could take security footage of people walking down the street. See that car that just turned? Yeah, it's more maneuverable than all those people who just walk straight and you never see them turn much at all.
Get real. A factory ship is not going to be as maneuverable as a 14' trimaran.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk
Scaled down, the whaling ships are just as maneuverable. Just stop arguing. It's pointless.
Also: Congrats on looking at Wikipedia for the ship stats.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Do you even know what close haul means? Or Luffing? Do you know how to tell the difference between a ship and a boat? How about historically? Is a brig a boat, a ship, or a place on a boat or a ship? Do you know what the difference is between a bridge and a poop deck? Seriously, if you did know what you were talking about, you wouldn't say that a 14 foot trimaran is less maneuverable or slower than a 231 foot factory ship. Their performance is not comparable, not even scaled.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@xAthrun If their performance scaled AT ALL, you would find that the MV Shōnan Maru 2, being 16.5 times longer than the Adi Gil, would be capable of 825 knots which is roughly equivilent to Mach 1.2... Now if the Japanese had super sonic whaling vessels, I don't think Sea Shepherd would even be able to pester them.
To use some of your own words 'No, seriously now' go to a harbor, ask a harbor master which has right of way, a 14 foot trimaran or a 231 foot factory ship.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk
I'm quite aware of which has the right of way. I don't see why you're pointing that out.
Also: The Ady Gil isn't 14'.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Don't get me wrong now, I'm all for saving the whales, but Sea Shepherd's theatrics and aggressive antics can't even save face, let alone the whales.
They're actually even hypocritical... They claim to be vegans but fuel the biodiesel engines of their vessels with animal fat. As ridiculous as vegans are, Sea Shepherd can't even keep their rhetoric straight.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk The Sea Shepherds aren't vegans. I haven't heard them claim it either.
Also: Sea Shepherd's current 'aggressiveness' is nothing compared to what they've done in the past.
If you've seen videos, you might have noticed the names on the sides of the Steve Irwin. (Such as the Sierra.) Those are names of ships that the Sea Shepherds have either sunk or rammed.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Not Vegan? Seriously? So not only do you not do your homework regarding the maneuverability of vessels, but you don't even do your homework about Sea Shepherd, then you come and tell me that I'm a moron?
I've got their web page open right now. Paul Watson (the head of Sea Shepherd) saying "My ships are vegan" It seriously doesn't get any more straight forward than that.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk Oh. I wasn't referring to the ships, and I wasn't aware that you were.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun He's referring to the meals served aboard the ships... Why do I even have to explain this to you?
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@xAthrun My 8 year old nephew is over and I said to him "Hey, you know that show Whale Wars?" he goes "yeah" I said "Did you know that the guy who runs Sea Shepherd, the people who are trying to save the whales on that show, that he says their ships are vegan?" He asked "what's vegan?" I said "vegan means no animal stuff like meat, milk, or leather" He asked "So the people saving the whales don't eat at McDonalds?" My 8 year old nephew gets it. Why don't you?
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk I'm aware of what a vegan is.
You're saying numerous contradicting things.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Yeah, you know what a vegan is, and you have poor reading comprehension. I had to explain vegans to my newphew, but he didn't think that "my ships are vegan" refers to the ships, he thought it refers to the crew of the ships. Again, why do I even have to explain this to you? I feel like I'm talking to a 3 year old.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk Perhaps you shouldn't use referential typing then, since TYPING is much harder to discern than speech.
Ships can indeed be 'vegan', by using bio-diesel fuel(vegetable oil,) and that's what I thought you were referring to.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Sorry but bio-diesel only means the fuel came from biological sources other than "dead dinosaur based petroleum". The Ady Gil for instance was very specifically fueled with a combination of vegetable oil and animal fat. Maybe you missed the part where I said they use animal fat. The full quote from Watson is "My ships are vegan because we are conservationists. There are simply not enough fish in the sea to continue to feed the ever expanding populations of humanity."
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@xAthrun But of course you didn't even bother looking up the quote before responding to it, which just goes back to your lack of research. It seems to me that you came into this with poorly researched, preconceived notions and you haven't bothered looking things up even when I've repeatedly told you to go and seek the information before arguing. I'm not here to educate you and you have no reason to believe what I say. Go out there and find out for yourself instead of arguing.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk
I DON'T believe what you say.
Also, I actually did indeed try to find the quote. I was unable to find it.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun And yes I'm aware of the Farley Mowat and most of their other ships. I refuse to call it the "Steve Irwin" because I doubt he'd ever have supported them if he knew that they're deceitful misanthropes.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk The current Steve Irwin is not the Farley Mowat.
The Farley Mowat is in a Canadian impound port.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Really? You looked it up did you? Seriously? Because I find that hard to believe. Punching the full quote into Google is going to pop up a page titled "Frequently Asked Questions" on their official webpage.
seashepherd org slash commentary-and-editorials/2008/10/26/frequently-asked-questions-286
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@xAthrun Also ask the harbor master which has right of way: a motorized long boat or a factory ship.
And yes I know the Ady Gil was a trimaran, doesn't change the fact that it falls into the same size classification as a long boat. And if you even THINK of arguing that the Ady Gil was a sailing vessel and that it didn't have a motor. Think again. The thing had a pair of 540 horsepower Cummins Mercruiser engines.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@luccaskunk .. Uh, what? I said absolutely nothing about the Ady Gil being a sailing vessel. I know it was a trimaran. I know it had a motor.
I don't see the point in stating any of that.
It seems you believe I don't actually know anything I'm talking about.
Also: The thought of saying that the Ady Gil had no motor, and that it was a sailing vessel, didn't even cross my mind. I thought it was quite sad that the million dollar vessel was destroyed.
xAthrun 7 months ago
@xAthrun Lastly, the Ady Gil had a top speed of 50 knots. The MV Shōnan Maru 2 which it collided with had a top speed of 18 knots.
I garauntee you that the Ady Gil had a smaller turning radius than the MV Shōnan Maru 2.
luccaskunk 7 months ago
@packer041 "eco-terrorist" Why not just call them terrorists and call it a day?
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mdredheadguy1979 Good call, sir
packer041 7 months ago 2
The rest of the civilized world should demand an end to this whaling crap by the japanese in recognition of all the help they're receiving after the earthquake/tsunami
mikeb2big 11 months ago
@mikeb2big Another american getting into other peoples business... hmm...
Polaf3456 10 months ago
@Polaf3456 Not all of us american's support or even agree with SS. Personally, I think SS is a terrorist group.
mdredheadguy1979 8 months ago 2
@Polaf3456
The guy who runs Sea Shepherd (Paul Watson) is Canadian, fyi.
I really feel bad for the Japanese. People really really understand the economic reasons for whaling -- e.g.-They're an island nation and being a bit more self-sufficient would go a long way towards decreasing the cost of living for the average person in Japan.
mikeygigs 8 months ago 2
@mikeb2big I disagree. I would not support holding back aid to people who are suffering just to force a sovereign country to do what I want them too.
mdredheadguy1979 7 months ago
@mikeb2big yeah im with you on that one mate. at least alot of countries are banning the sale of whale meat so one day it shouldnt be as big a market. same goes for poaching endangered species... when will people learn
cliffy84 7 months ago
they deserve it stupid ass nredy bitches
lilsagey 1 year ago
faen azz den kosta 2 millioner dollar også spyler på dem etter krasjet HVA FAEN ER POINTE MED DET!?!
sk8erbikemartin 1 year ago
That ship "Ady Gil" costed 2 million dollars!
damn
jijonho 1 year ago
Money well spent.. DOUCHES!
ubersteigen 1 year ago
Så kan de lære det.
MrPointless 1 year ago
@MrPointless hvad vil du have dem til at lære?
valhalex 1 year ago
@valhalex at blive ramt af et større skib, naturligvis.
MrPointless 1 year ago
@NASENTV
jesus6666499 1 year ago
Bad Get out Japanese~,,~
saturnwing 1 year ago
yeah banzaaaaaaaaiiiiiii
coolstuffplus 1 year ago
even if the Sea Shepards were at fault for the collision, the Japanese would still be facing immense pressure from other countries to stop their whaling. Australia and New Zealand have already condemned Japan's activities, and multiple other countries aren't far behind.
Goirdy 1 year ago
@Goirdy oh no, they "Condemned" them. Big deal, not going to change anything.
Area51T 1 year ago
they got what they asked for and deserve
Frank200843 1 year ago
I guess next time, they will either ram them with a bigger boat, or just get the hell out of the way lol.
zeppelin67637 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Of course it polluted the ocean but you tree huggers chose to ignore those pesky FACTS and bethune should be CRIMINALLY charged for what he did. It was blatantly obvious the addy intentionally tried to steer in front of the bigger vessel creating an extremely dangerous situation causing it to be struck. It was a shame the occupants of the addy didn't go down with the ship,, they are nothing more than terrorist.
h20fwler1 1 year ago
1 down, 2 more ships to sink! Go get um Japan!
delimabrand 1 year ago
Whale burgers are yummy!
TheJcp1234 1 year ago 2
God why are people so damn racist, not all Japanese are pro-whaling so don't act that they are all bad. Besides the sea shepards crew are a bunch of lying assholes. They could have moved out of the way but chose not to. I am 1000% against whaling but come on, what the sea shepards crew did would be like if I ran in front of a speeding bus and then blamed the bus driver for me getting hit.
-.-
masanobuandolover 1 year ago
Harpooning 950 whales for research? What are they researching? How much blood a whale can lose before they die?
sdremish 1 year ago
Sea Shepherd is so useless lol... What they want to do? GET ON THE SHIP AND FIGHT EVERY JAPANESE AND KILL THEM ALL? I dont think so...
TheAlexPetrie 1 year ago
They shouldn't have been there. They got off lucky.
emmangoldstein1984 1 year ago
love this clip! GG Japan!
klintrimus 1 year ago
@VNSki, hey dumbshit, It wasn't a joke. The damn Atom bomb was an abuse of power used twice and the weapon's fall-out has damaged many generations. Apparently it was a necessary evil. Look at how the world is today. The fiberglass Sea Shepherd shouldn't have been out there alone when trying to do something humanitarian. Both sides should have been out there preventing illegal activity.
Scorpion85629 1 year ago
yup they were gonna refule on the bob barker but instead of lossing the nissian maru they went on and they had to stop to waite for the steve irwin
mikeman42986 1 year ago
they couldnt turn. they were ideling waiteing to refule
mikeman42986 1 year ago
@mikeman42986 ideling infront of a boat?
neozeonsolid 1 year ago
that is attempted murder if that was in american or british waters the crew of the whaling boat would be in prison
RayAllen12321 1 year ago
@RayAllen12321 they idled thier boat infrom of a massive clumsy whaling boat. they could have moved easy thats the thing i dont get....
michael12533 1 year ago
@MaguireWard You are blind if you don't see the AG propwash. Or just too biased to see it.
JRBeaman 1 year ago
They were stationary at the time? Then what is the Ady Gil prop wash indicating they were powering forward for 7 seconds before the collision into the SMs path? Liar.
JRBeaman 1 year ago
@MaguireWard First, the activist boat wasn't stationary. It wasn't moving at a high rate of speed, but it wasn't just sitting there bobbing up and down. Plus it also accelerated forward (into the Japanese ship) at a high rate about 4 seconds before the collision.
As for the Japanese (Jap is a derogatory term used by racists and bigots) ship turning, you have to know the entire issue to understand why the japanese ship turned the way it did. Apparently you don't know the entire issue.
USDAChuckSteak 1 year ago
@USDAChuckSteak it was completely stationary, captain and crew were ON TOP of the boat the entire time. The only person that was in the boat (&injured) at the time was a camera man for their tv show and had no knowledge of how to even run the boat. If you watch the video from their tv show it shows about 5 minutes longer footage than this, they're sitting relaxing on the boat waiting to refuel from their other ship... then all sudden japanese boat heads towards them and turns sharply into them.
YourLoveLetter 1 year ago
@YourLoveLetter It was not stationary. If you watch the footage from the SM#2 you can see cavitation coming from the aft of the AG. That cavitation is from the AG's props turning. If the props are turning the boat is NOT stationary. It may not have been going "fast" but is was FAR from stationary. The was a crew member at the helm and it was not a camera man.
On top of this New Zealand released an official report and deemed BOTH ships at fault. Both.
USDAChuckSteak 1 year ago
@USDAChuckSteak There was no movement from the small boat, if there was it was so minuscule that cameras couldn't even capture it lol. As opposed to the japanese ship which clearly shows a sharp direct fast turn. As far as propellers being active, you know boats can run in neutral which specifically keeps them from drifting. If you are waiting for a ship and relaxing on TOP of your boat the most you would be doing is running it in neutral anyways, to keep your position.
YourLoveLetter 1 year ago
@YourLoveLetter There is clearly movement from the Ady Gil. If you can't see that then you are biased. Pete B. has already confirmed that the engines were in idle with the drives engaged which gave the Ady forward momentum. All be it slight. Then a few seconds before the collision the Ady Gil throttles up and shootf forward right into the SM#2. Who's fault? Both ships are at fault. If you can't see the wrongs BOTH ships did then you are a simple propaganda whore.
USDAChuckSteak 1 year ago
the sea shepard are all about stupid--stupid is as stupid does--fucking dummies
100crawma 1 year ago
Japan boat hit the Ady Gil on purpose. From a different view you can see the Japanese boat turn into their direction. Also, they japanese boat crew did not respond to calls of helping the men thrown in the water.
zranch 1 year ago
@zranch 1. The Japanese ship turned because this is what it had done all teh previous time the smaller boat had illegally crossed it's bow. The Japanese ship didn't realize the small boat had throttled back until to late. This is why you see the Japanese ship turn towards then away.
2. The Japanese ship was also int eh collision and their priority is vwerifying the damage to their ship. There were other ship to respond. The only SSCS ship to report a mayday was the barker and it wasn't hurt.
USDAChuckSteak 1 year ago
@zranch Also, no one was thrown in the water. So either you are misinformed or you are lying.
Which is it?
USDAChuckSteak 1 year ago
Fucking assholes used the water canon to prevent possible evation of collision. Hiroshima again........... what! Goo-bye slant eye.
Scorpion85629 1 year ago
@Scorpion85629 you say things like that, and think it's funny and shit. it wouldn't be funny if you've been hit by a nuke dumbfuck. i don't want to argue with dumbasses like you because it's a waste of time, but what you said is no disturbing,even though im not jap.
VNSki 1 year ago
Holy Crap that used to be one badass looking boat!