Obama Outraged At Intelligence Failures

[webdesign212]

So you think you should be able to take what is not yours and you did not earn then? You want hand outs do ya? GET A F'N JOB YOU PIECE OF SH*T LOSER!

Rich earned their money and its theirs, not yours. To bad so sad you didnt succeed in life. don't try to steal other peoples success to make up for your short comings.

[Hoschi0913]

why put devices on our airports that detect's "dangerous" substances only?? i would put in devices that detect and make those substances explode right there on the spot, advantage ....no need for any no fly list or "profiling" or any other bull shit they try to hit us with to make it more "safe" for us ,you get rid of any bombing attempt right away

[boneheadagain]

The US has added Nigeria to its list of "countries to be suspicious of people flying from"? So is the problem "Nigerians"? Is it "Nigerians" who are trying to destroy the USA and all other "non-Nigerian democracy"? No? So why is it "Nigeria" that Obama sees as the risk? He doesn't seem to mind offending all the other Nigerians, does he? If it's "wrong" to profile Muslims as "some Muslims are innocent" why profile "Nigeria"? The problem isn't a nationality, it's a religion. It is called Islam.

[WebAnt]

@boneheadagain I was with you until you said the problem is Islam. It is not. The problem is extremists interpreting the teachings of islam or the Koran in such a way as to justify murder. Fortunately,extremists are not in the majority among Muslims. Unfortunately, even a relative few number of violent extremists can be responsible for much mayhem and murder because they are capable of and will do anything.

[kuffarphobia]

WebAnt, you seem to be mixing people with ideology. It is the ideology that is the driving force, not the individual actors. An ideology that calls for the death of those who reject it. So was the KKK bad, or were there just "violent extremists" within it? How about the concentration camps? Is the fault only with the actual guards, or with the ideology that created and enabled them? Remember, mainstream Islamic sharia law calls for the death of "deniers", so how would you "interpret" that?

[WebAnt]

You need to do some actual research on how many Muslims are violent. I have and the fact I keep repeatedly coming across is that only a minority believing in forcefully converting people to Islam or carrying out jihads or killing unbelievers. Only a minority believe that Islam is an ideology that calls for the death of those who reject it. Only a minority follow or believe in sharia law. So,to say Islam is the problem and not individuals who choose to practice it a certain way is wrong.

[WebAnt]

Sharia law is absolutely not mainstream because the majority of Muslims do not embrace it or believe in it. They do not practice it. The vast majority of Muslims interpret the teachings of Islam in such a way as to put them at peace with non-Muslim neighbors while a minority do not. Therefore,Islam is not the problem. It is a minority of Muslims who are considered by the vast majority of Muslims to have twisted their religion in a way that enables them to wrongfully kill unbelievers. Research

[kuffarphobia]

@WebAnt Once again, you mix "Islam" with what individuals do. Islamic law calls for the extermination of unbelievers. If "most Muslims do not practice this", then it is the individuals' basic humanity and not the ideology that makes them "not carry out the dictates of sharia". Thus, the fact is that the less "Muslim" they are, the more they can live side by side with non-Muslims. You can't separate sharia from Islam, that's like trying to separate Catholicism from the Pope.

[WebAnt]

I hear you but you cannot blame Islam for the bad things some Muslims do without taking away their personal responsibility or accountability for their own actions. If I go along with you blaming Islam for what some Muslims do then I might as well blame the Devil every time I mess up since I am a Christian. That would be ludicrous. I am responsible when I choose to do something wrong,not Satan. And,it is I that must choose to go before my God and repent as well. Sorry,I cannot go along with you.

[armyofonerd]

@WebAnt I think some would argue that certain parts of a religion teach their followers to hate others and that is the point. Not blaming an entire religion, however certain "branches" of a religion are not in the best interests of peace. This can be said of almost any religion, however when was the last time you read about a terrorist bombing by a radical christian religion?

[WebAnt]

True that. However,one could argue that everyone has a personal responsibility to ditch a religion or certain parts of a religion if it or they are not beneficial to mankind because many have chosen to do so. Certainly,most Muslims have chosen to ditch any parts of sharia law that would put them at violent odds with non-believers. Thank God. Unfortunately,even in this modern age certain countries do have people in them who claim to be Christian but have committed or are committing evil deeds.

[WebAnt]

For example,in Africa some of those killing Muslims do indeed claim to be Christians and the conflict in Bosnia was reportedly a clash between so called Christian Serbs and Muslim Bosnians, I believe. Of course,we know that Biblical Christians would rather be murdered and were murdered rather than lift their hands in violence against their oppressors. Biblical Christians clearly demonstrated that Christians are supposed to be non-violent or pacifists.

[WebAnt]

Just like you say it a Muslim's basic humanity that prevents them from following the bloodthirsty and barbaric sharia law then you need to concede that it the basic inhumanity of some Muslims that cause them to follow it. It is not sharia law or Islam  that is the problem but it is people that have chosen to ignore their own consciences or their own humanity or whatever is decent in most people and commit unspeakable acts of evil and destruction. They are responsible,not Islam.

[kuffarphobia]

You seem to contradict yourself. Your claim that it is not "Islam as an ideology" that is at fault, but the deviant behaviour of individuals within it. Then you claim that most Muslims are peaceful and tolerant because they DO NOT accept Islamic ideology as law. These people are not diletantes who "seeking to murder at any cost" have chosen Islam as a smokescreen, they have read the Koran, they are Muslims. The basic dictates of Islam call for the extermination of "kuffar". That is a fact.

[WebAnt]

Maybe they do not interpret the basic dictates of Islam the same way you do. As a matter of fact,I do believe I recall seeing some Muslims who are emphatic in their belief that their religion does not call for them to exterminate all who are not Muslims. They would probably argue you down to the ground and refuse any attempts on your part to define them as anything but real or true Muslims. Personally,I would not even advise arguing with them unless you're Muslim yourself. Shalom.

[kuffarphobia]

"I would not even advise arguing with them unless you're Muslim yourself", No, I am an atheist, one of those who are killed under Islam. Do you define the measure of oppression by the opinions of the oppressor or of the oppressed? If you want to discover the true nature of the violence of any group, don't ask the perpetrators of the hate, ask the victims. To use your own words "I would not even advise arguing with them unless your are among those Islam is trying to eradicate yourself".

[WebAnt]

I am saying that arguing with Muslims is pointless because there is about zero chance you would convince either non-violent or violent Muslims they are incorrect concerning their religion and what it teaches or advocates. The only thing left for non-Muslims to do is try to protect themselves to the best of their ability from violent Muslims and be supportive of Muslims that advocate peace or non-violence.

[kuffarphobia]

What we CAN do is encourage and support those people who wish to leave Islam. We can listen to their side of the argument instead of only thinking about cheap oil and not "offending" the Gulf States and other Muslim oil states. We can create a climate where ex-Muslims no longer have to fear for their lives. The freedom to change one's religion is a human right, guarenteed in the UN's declaration. We must support people's right to live free of this threat. There is a lot we can "do".

[apostatewinner]

And talk about discrimination? Did you know that in Egypt (one of our so-called moderate Muslim countries) it is illegal for a Christian man to marry a Muslim woman, though it is perfectly legal for a Muslim man to marry a Christian woman in Egypt, as long as she converts to Islam. As far as I am aware, no non-Muslim country treats Muslims in this derogatory, second-class way. This reminds of the old Jim Crow laws in the USA. And that's the Christians, so imagine how bad atheists have it.

[WebAnt]

Wow,the more I learn the more I am not liking that particular religion.

[kuffarphobia]

Basically, Islam "tolerates" Christians and Jews as it sees them as being "fellow Abrahamic monotheists that need to get their minds right and eventually accept the truth of the Koran". Christians and Jews are tolerated in a some Islamic countries as second class citizens as long as they know their place and subject themselves and their beliefs to Islam's "moral superiority". Some don't even do that. For example, there are no churches in Saudi Arabia, they are illegal, as is having a Bible.

[WebAnt]

Just terrible. Proof positive that America is NOT a Christian nation because if it was it would not have fellowhip with a country like Saudi Arabia. As much as I might gripe about this country I have to give America props in terms of it treating different peoples fairly. No country is better at that than America. The only problem in terms of that in America is that the rich tend to get preferential treatment although as has been pointed out here the poor can have it pretty good.

[WebAnt]

I hear you,

[WebAnt]

Do a search on the internet and you will discover that Muslims who do not believe their religion is a violent religion or that it does not encourage violence against unbelievers claim that certain parts of the Koran or that certain religious teachings associated with Islam have been taken out of context or misinterpreted and that is why some who claim to be Muslims are so violent. They might be right for all I know. I am just glad they have chosen to be peaceful.

[kuffarphobia]

What individuals claim to "believe" is one thing. Sudan Lybia, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Qatar, Yemen, Mauritania are just some of the countries that have Islamic Sharia as their legal system and where rejection of Islam carries a death penalty. How can Western apologists claim this is not real Islam? Who would "educate" the Muslim world on what real Islam is? Violence against those who reject Islam is mainstream and not simply marginal and "out of context".

[WebAnt]

I am reading on one site that you have to be openly in rebellion against islam in order to get the death penalty. You do not get it simply for deciding to not be a Muslim anymore but for deciding to go against Islam or attack it. Is that correct?

[kuffarphobia]

Islam (Both Sunni and Shia) consider any denial of "Allah" to be an attack on the religion and the diety. The term "kuffar" means "denier". Áccording to Islam, "Allah" can forgive more or less any sin EXCEPT the sin of disbelief. The act of apostasy (leaving Islam) carries the death penalty in most Muslim countries. Islam considers all decent to be "open rebelion", equating it with some kind of "treason against Allah". Sad but true. Google apostasy and Islam.

[WebAnt]

Woah,that is rough.

[WebAnt]

While Islamic sharia law is mainstream in countries like Iran it is not embraced or accepted or followed in most Muslim countries and it is not embraced by the majority of Muslims in non-Muslim countries like Britain and the U,S. If it was, terrorism would be much worse than it currently is. Much worse.

[kuffarphobia]

Amerca avoided another "non-specified human-originated catastrophe" in the eyes of Mr Obama. As long as you can avoid stating the obvious fact that Islam is the problem, Americans can continue to buy cheap gas from Saudi Arabia for their environment-killer SUVs. You can be like the monkeys who hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil, but the evil is there all the same. This didn't start with Obama, but he's not exactly trying to stop it now, is he? The best president money can buy?

[STAR6440]

Its all about the 7 deadly sin and power to control people but there only one true power who control all its God. Thing from the past that leaders has done behind close door to harm others is coming to light for the world to see. There is a end to every thing that's living on this earth.

[STAR6440]

White government ( leaders)been trying to control blacks for years but very little to control illegal. Now the state going broken wonder why. Take a look at Maafa 21 Part 8/13, Nixon tape his conversation.

[STAR6440]

Obama walk into chit that been there for years even before he was born ,and he can't fix all over night. Than people expect miracles over night by him.

[CaptainBubblePhD]

Obama's "pledges becoming mere rhetoric". Is this really a surprise to anyone?

[armyofonerd]

I guess I'm surprised that people still take his words at face value knowing all of the broken promises he has made. Nothing is wrong with believing someone, however once you have someone like Obama it's nice to ask them to prove themselves. Hell, Obama gave a speech on words, and yet that is all he gives us - words and empty promises. The press ignore the continued lies of Obama and expect us to do the same. I expect more from a public official, I guess thats just me.

[WebAnt]

Kind of makes him getting the Nobel Peace Prize based on what he has said and not what he has done all the more stinging,doesn't it? Sigh.

[WebAnt]

No. When you vote for a politician the most you can hope for is that they at least keep some of their promises.

[STAR6440]

We have not learn nothing sent 9/11 when we lost many people and love ones

[armyofonerd]

Here is my first question for this expert: Given the fact that Obama has refused to keep his promise on transparency involving healthcare and he has refused to demand his democratic party hold all healthcare meeting in public and his 8 empty promises during his campaign, why would we expect this President to keep any promise to the American people? Zero transparency, hiring lobbyists and massive unemployment with massive spending. If you were to make Bush half black, he would look like Obama

[WebAnt]

Who was the last president to actually keep all his campaign promises?

[armyofonerd]

Keep all, how about keep any promise to the American people. Obama could care less about the American people, he only wants to grab power. Promised no lobbyists - fail. Promised no back room healthcare deals - fail. Promised transparency - fail. Obama promised 8 times to allow us the American people to see the healthcare debate, who was making the secret backroom deals and it is another Fail for Obama. Now we know it is the democats and Obama with the secret backroom deals, not Bush.

[WebAnt]

Oh I am sure Bush had his fair share of back room deals as well. If you are not aware of any,his people did an excellent job of hiding them. There is a reason Bush insisted on invading Iraq and you better believe it had nothing to do with Iraq actually being a real threat to America. Some have said oil and some have said it was revenge but the one thing I know for sure is that there was no real need for us to go into that country and I am reasonably sure Bush was aware of that.

[armyofonerd]

It has been 1 year for Obama and here you are still talking about Bush. We are talking of all the broken promises of Obama. How Obama ran on bringing "change" to the White House and how it was nothing but a lie from Obama. Since people like you always bring up Bush, did you notice how his approval ratings fell among HIS voters?? We expect someone to keep their promises - and Obama has failed. More unemployment, lobbyists, more secret backroom deals, nothing on C-Span - Obama failures.

[WebAnt]

Look up the American Opportunity Tax Credit. Instead of focusing on everything that Obama is doing wrong why not give him some credit for what he is doing right? For instance,in spite of my feelings about Bush it was mighty decent of him to stand against the barbaric practice of partial birth abortions and to be against tax payers paying for abortions. Have a nice weekend.

[armyofonerd]

Are you serios? Healthcare will cost 1/6th of our entire GDP and you try to compare that to a tax credit? Something that was promised to be in the open, no secrets and here Obama lied to all the American people. Give him credit, when someone fails to keep 95% of his promises, it's hard to give credit. Bush spent way too much, he approved every democratic spending bill during his last two years and passed the republican spending bills the 6 years before that. But Obama is far worse.

[WebAnt]

Point made. So,making sure every American's health care needs are met is not worth it? Are you serious?

[armyofonerd]

Every American's healthcare needs are being met - however in this world some things are paid for. Kind of like the car you drive, the house you live in and the food you eat. I guess from your point of view, the gov't and our taxes should pay for the food, car and house you desire to live in should you not want to pay for it yourself. That makes sense to you?? Are you serious? What is wrong with expecting someone to pay for the things they desire? Why not create a flat tax for all to pay?

[WebAnt]

@armyofonerd No,they are not. That is why Americans tend to not be as healthy as people in many other countries. Because they do not have health care coverage or do not have enough many Americans tend to wait until they are really sick before they go to the doctor. They simply cannot afford regular doctor visits which would be the equivalent of preventative maintenance. From my point of view,the govt. should help the less fortunate but the less fortunate should pay what they can.

[WebAnt]

@armyofonerd A flat tax might unduly burden those with low incomes. I would favor an income based tax instead and if a person is really poor not bother taxing them at all. People with money tend to substitute the word responsibility and fairness with greed in order to hide the fact that they do not wish to be their brother's keeper and care about no one but their selves. The less fortunate can go fly a kite for all they care. I favor each one being required to pay only as they are able.

[WebAnt]

@WebAnt What I meant to say is that sometimes the monied tend to try to hide their greed or unwillingness to help the less fortunate by focusing on the poor and destitute being responsible and the govt being fair and taxing everyone the same. They try to make the less fortunate feel bad about wanting free stuff and getting food stamps and wic and all kinds of government handouts but at the same time will jump at corporate welfare in the form of tax write offs and baillouts. Pfft.

[armyofonerd]

@WebAnt Are you saying that those people with "low" incomes should not share the cost of a safe nation? A flat tax is the most "fair" tax there is. Everyone pays XX% - no matter how much you make and no matter what company it is. ?brothers keeper? The fact is, most "rich" people find a way to hide their money already - getting rid of the "exemptions" would give more money to the country. Tell me, why is it allowed for those in public office to refuse to pay their "fair share" of taxes?

[WebAnt]

If a poor person has 10 dollars and a rich person has a 1,000 dollars is it truly fair to expect that poor person to pay the same percentage in taxes as the rich person? I think not. Why? The rich person has so much more and the ten percent is not so much of a burden. No,what would be fair is to charge the poor person less than 10 percent so as not to burden them as much. A lot of wrong things are allowed in this country because,frankly,our leaders are not righteous.

[armyofonerd]

The answer is yes. each could pay 10%. The "poor" person would pay $1 and the rich person would pay $100. Each and every person benefits from this country and therefore each and every person should contribute. People respect something when they pay for it - plain and simple. Is it fair that a person be able to collect __________, when they have never paid into it? NO! Thats the problem, social security should be restricted to only those who have paid into it (or a family member).

[WebAnt]

Each could pay 10 percent but why should a poor person bear the same burden as a rich person when the rich person can bear it so much more easily? That just does not make sense to me but then again I am more for the poor than the rich. I am saddled with this litte thing called compassion for the less fortunate. Poor me,huh? Anyway,I agree that everyone should contribute but I do not agree with you concerning how much. I never will.

[armyofonerd]

I would argue that the poor person could bear it just as easy if not even more easy. The "poor" person gets food for free, gets healthcare for free and it not even expected to work. They don't pay taxes, and for some reason get a tax refund. People in general will allow themselves to do nothing if nothing is expected. It's time to demand the "poor" of this country to stand just as the working class have stood for so many years.

[WebAnt]

You act like there is no time limit on the free food. Believe it or not,people too poor to have insurance do end up with massive medical bills in this country if they do something like get surgery. Like I said,everyone on unemployment is expected to keep looking for work and I suspect the same is true of those on welfare. The poor definitely pay taxes and that is why get refunds. Come on man. I do not think you know anything about the poor in this country. Seriously.

[armyofonerd]

You are wrong, it is those people who have to pay nothing that are the ones that continue to abuse the system on a monthly if not weekly basis. They see a PCP for anything and everything because they don't pay for copays or anything else - that is pathetic. How many jobs do you have to look for a week on unemployment? 5 Come on, you could look for 5 jobs in one day. The problem is that most social programs cut off all benefits if you take a minimum wage job instead of dropping by a %

[WebAnt]

I do not know about people who are abusing the system but I do know of people who have worked and become unemployed and deserve every penny of unemployment they get because they earned it. You would have people without much money pay for copays and stuff? The no. of job contacts you have to make varies and the no. might be reasonable if searching for work involves a lot of travel. Especially,if one does not own their own transportation. Why would social programs do that? That makes no sense.

[WebAnt]

What I remember is that years ago when I was on unemployment I took a job that was less than what I was getting on unemployment and the state made up the difference. Is it still done like that? And yes,social programs cutting off as soon as you get even the lowest paying job is a problem because it gives you incentive to stay unemployed. Very bad.

[armyofonerd]

I so agree, however what I see now is people did not prepare for this and now they expect handouts. Just because times are good, does not mean you should not prepare for tough times. Seeing people drive up in their $50K SUV to get food stamps is pathetic. Just like showing up in a hospital and saying they can't afford the bills, but have the latest and greatest $300 cell phone is pathetic.

[WebAnt]

I do not know if you know this but people with low incomes can pay a lot in taxes. A lot. And,it seems the more money you make though still not making a lot of money the more the government takes. It is no wonder that those on the lower end of the economic scale do not want to pay copays or really pay for medical care while paying for what you consider to be luxuries. Are you serious about somebody driving up in a 50K SUV getting food stamps? I have never heard of something like that.

[WebAnt]

In other words,even if you are barely making ends meet and get some overtime on a job,the U.S. government acts like you are rich and taxes the h e double hockey sticks out of you. It would not be so bad if you were actually were rich. This kind of ridiculousness is why I think the government needs to back off the middle class and poor more in terms of taxes and tax the rich more. I know there are good arguments against that though and you will probably bring them up. That is just how I feel.

[armyofonerd]

I just heard that Obama now is going to tax the banks - and guess what - the same banks are going to pass those costs onto us - Obama will say that he did not tax the middle class, however anyone with a bank account will pay more - this is gov't double speak. It's time the poor and the rich helped bring this country back to the top - ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country - that does not mean giving out more welfare. Everyone is on a financial diet.

[hectixx]

It's not just the U.S. Government mate, any government will get away with as much as they can, that's just a fact in life.

[webdesign212]

So punish those who worked hard for their money and to get rich, then reward the lazy fucks who didn't go to collage or live off welfare? I say we tax the lazy fuckers more so they will get a job, go to school, stop being welfare moms and get a job!

My guess would be you are a lazy poor person who dosent make any money, and live off your middle class parents still.

[WebAnt]

@webdesign212 I do not see it as punishment if a rich person has to settle for a Lexus instead of a Porsche,if you get my drift. Not everyone who does not go to college or is poor is lazy. Even Bush talked about the poor who have two or three jobs trying to make ends meet. And,you should know that the job market is awful and work is not easy to find. You sound like a spoiled little rich kid who knows nothing about the real world. As far as guessing goes,don't quit your day job. :-)

[WebAnt]

Because our leaders are not righteous they have written laws in such a way as to benefit themselves and their rich benefactors or owners the most and to unduly burden the rest of us. At this point,probably the best chance most Americans have of being treated fairly by their government is to leave this country and become citizens of some European countries. Many Americans have indeed left and do report that living in countries like France and Britain is better.

[armyofonerd]

Most Americans would be shocked if they moved to Europe. They don't realize their tax rate is far higher than ours - and yet with all those extra taxes they have a healthcare system that is worse, less freedoms and less opportunity to succeed. This country is the best, however more social programs are not the answer - what is the answer, is demanding people stand for once in their lives and do something. Making a choice not to work because unemployment benefits pays more is not the answer.

[WebAnt]

I have seen Americans that have moved to Europe and they seem to be happier as a result. Better health care because everyone is covered by affordable if not free health care. Better educational systems. In some countries like Holland women can get like a year off work after having a baby and be paid for that year. Yes,the tax rate is higher but not enough to break the poor or the rich and they get so much in return. So much. This country absolutely is not the best but not the worst either.

[WebAnt]

Compare the infant mortality rate of America to many European countries and then tell me their health care systems are worse. Consider that these countries with socialized medicine have more available preventative care and therefore less people tend to get so worse off that they end up seriously ill in emergency rooms. Expensive. Freedoms are overrated if too many of the people in a given country are going without and such is the case in America.

[armyofonerd]

The problem with that is that many countries don't use the same criteria to define infant mortality. If you define it as a cause from another problem, then it does not give a true reflection. Have you not seen the lottery in Canada where you have to see if you can even get a PCP - and you call that better?

[WebAnt]

Okay,maybe I have gotten in over my head. What in the world is a PCP? Is it not true that in countries like France and Britain everyone get free health care? That has got to be better than America where many Americans wait until they are really sick to go to the hospital because they cannot afford regular doctor visits.Regular doctor visits that are absolutely free in many countries with socialized medicine. Right?

[armyofonerd]

PCP - Primary Care Physician. Here, you can be seen for a health related problem, however most doctors (PCP's) believe it or not - expect some type of reimbursement. Funny, when these same people arrive at a fast food place, they actually pull out money for the food they are about to eat, but healthcare is looked at so differently - why? It's time everyone helped pay for the things they want - not just the working class. Also, making $25,000 is not poor!

[WebAnt]

The problem is that a lot of Americans just cannot afford some type of reimbursement. Whether or not that is due to poor spending habits changes from case to case,I am sure. Nevertheless,I feel you. Whether or not you can be poor making 25 thousand depends on things like how many children you have. Feel me?

[WebAnt]

If you mean that in European countries with things like socialized medicine people have less oppportunities to succeed in becoming obscenely rich at the expense of most of the populace,you are correct. American doctors are paid more than European doctors because they are willing to do anything to make money including being part of a health care system that overcharges people and recommending drugs people may not need because drug companies pay them to.

[armyofonerd]

I can tell you know nothing about healthcare. Some of the reasons doctors are paid well is to pay their massive insurance bills to protect them from stupid lawsuits - which is not a part of healthcare reform under Obama. Many doctors are only paid close to $125K or $200K. Would you go to school for 12 years after college to make that - and then be expected to pay off all those student loans?

[WebAnt]

I think that in America social programs do require that people stand and do something. For instance,if you are on unemployment you are required to actually look for work and how much you get in unemployment is based on incomes from previous jobs. You have to work to get it. In my case,my unemployment benefits are less than what I was making while working and this is not a rare thing. I can tell you have either never been on unemployment and/or simply know nothing about it.

[kuffarphobia]

Do the paranoid get state assistance in the USA? Is there some financial advantage to delusional ranting over there? You wanted "our tired, our poor, our huddled masses" and all you got was our congenitally INSANE! At least the tinfoil-hat manufacturers must be making a profit...

[mutattu]

Maybe I'm getting cynical too - but the timing of this escapade is just perfectly CONVENIENT. So fear is back on the agenda yet again - and we all know what the answer is don't we.

MORE surveillance, more security, more CONTROL!!

Mossad pulled a fast one here, and I'm even beginning to wonder where those useless Katusha rockets are really made.

Just in time to justify another IDF turkey shoot in Gaza when things are looking edgity over the 'peace' process and Obama reminds us of Bush...

[xhaxhibb]

there is no such things as terrorists... people who belive in GOD/ ALLAH  those are not terrorists The terrorists are the fucking illuminati feat some jews.... any way that day is coming were true belivers who belive in GOD or ALLAH they will win... fuck you illuminatis zaionis freemanson what eva the fuck you are

[kuffarphobia]

@xhaxhibb "there is no such things as terrorists"? Only a retarded kuffarphobe like you woould say that. There is no such thing as "illuminati". Muslims cause hate, suffering and death everywhere they go on this planet. Not Freemasons, not illuminati, not Harry Potter, but MUSLIMS!

[xhaxhibb]

@kuffarphobia : fuck you and ur jew curly hair.....

[kuffarphobia]

You are simply another ignorant Muslim kuffarphobe, bitch...

[skibee50]

Stick it up your ass ?? Is that what you are saying??

[krager666]

I think it was totally the Spanish Yakuza - they are trying to launch a covert double cross to convince the Chinese White Supremists to go to war with Antartica over inflated woolen-beanie prices. Seriously, are all Americans as paranoid and frightened as you guys?

[g00gleb0t]

The only thing more stupid than US "Intellligence" are the hordes of conspiracy theorists who think the Jews control everything.

[MoneyIsSilver]

CBS NEWS: Hard at work spreading outright bullshit!!

This reeks of false flag terror all over. Well, everything on the news is a lie, but this is a more heinous lie than usual.

The zionists in the media cooked this up to justify invading Yemen and to put body scanners in airports. Scanners that mess with your DNA, because they want to kill Americans too.

[vinniyo]

why voypics?

[boneheadagain]

Barak "Future threats will NOT be refered to as threats, and in this way, we will have no more threats" Obama..."from now on, we will not call this Islamic terrorism, if we call it something else, then we wont have to worry about it". Obama's new "Linguistic defense" - "the future of American politics"

[palmrockbermuda]

Good Morning ......CBS up to the minute

[WebAnt]

Obama is having to deal with so much messed up stuff because of the utter incompetence of the Bush administration and it really bothers me that people blame him for stuff that was not dealt with when Bush was in office and will take many years to fix.

[MoneyIsSilver]

You sir, are 100% brainwashed.

Obama and Bush are on the same zionist team. Don't you know about false flag terrorism. The zionist media made this up to justify us going to war with another of Israel's enemies, and to justify putting body scanners in US airports. It's pretty obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together.

[WebAnt]

@MoneyIsSilver Your proof?

[MoneyIsSilver]

The better question is: "Where's your proof that this even happened?"

The "news". Oh, I see, you just believe anything they tell you on TV right? Do you actually KNOW any of these people? Do some research fool

[WebAnt]

It is all speculation without proof and calling somebody names is childish and gives people reason to believe you are frustrated knowing full well you cannot prove anything you say. All it boils down to is people having dfferent opinions and if you cannot respect the opinions of others you are really too immature to be posting on a site like this. Word.

[MoneyIsSilver]

The only one speculating is you. You don't know anything about these people in the media and you take what they say to be the gospel.

Like the guy in "Network" said, "You think like a tube!"

[WebAnt]

Everybody speculates,even experts. Even you. Some people are just better at it than others. I will concede that I probably do put too much trust in what people in the media say sometimes. Obviously,it is a mistake to ever do that.

What does that mean? I would substitute the word rube.

[Cidique]

@MoneyIsSilver That, sir, is 100% brainwashed. Curse you and your zionist ways.

(See what I did there?)

[MoneyIsSilver]

Yeah, you made a non-argument based on trying to be snarky, but you don't know shit about what you're talking about.

How about this: Can you brainwashed fuckers come up with any major policy differences between the two, without using bullshit rhetoric like saying "Bush couldn't complete a sentence, and Obama is well spoken". Shit like that is completely irrelevant to the policies of the puppetmasters. You all need to watch "The Obama Deception"

[Cidique]

@MoneyIsSilver You're funny. I like you.

[WebAnt]

I think that one major policy difference between the two is that while Obama has been tireless in his efforts to bring Universal Health Care to this country Bush could not have cared less. Another is while Bush was for putting more restrictions on abortions,Obama is for putting less restrictions on abortions via FOCA. Yet another is while Bush put an emphasis on Iraq it seems to me that Obama has been putting an emphasis on Afghanistan and Iran.Man,do you have a potty mouth.

[armyofonerd]

The restrictions you mention that were put on by Bush was simply we actually expect those that desire an abortion to pay for it themselves, without using our healthcare money. Imagine that, holding someone accountable for their actions - wow, what a new concept. Obama pretents to say everything will be free, and yet this country is in debt, continues to increase our debt with more empty promises and for some reason you think a secret backroom healthcare deal will be for the people??

[WebAnt]

Bush did the right thing concerning abortions. Obama is doing the wrong thing. I imagine that this secret backroom healthcare deal will have to have something in it that benefits the public but it will probably also benefit the powers that be as well. Getting legislation that benefits the people only is pretty much impossible when just about all politicians are bought and paid for and have to pay homage to their owners a.k.a. campaign donors.

[valeriestjohn]

Every Administration, all talk, wrong action. Rather than continue to increasingly inconvenience the lives of American citizens who live IN the country - solve the problem - Get out of their country and allow the people to proceed with their civil war. Oil pipelines or not, we need to stop wasting our precious resources (Lives, money) battling the people of those countries.

[STAR6440]

First of all its not Obama fault for what these people are doing to kill American people. This been going on for many many years, the different is they are on American soil with there bombs now. I to is sick of the world and the country with all the hate for one another it is a shame for grown folks act like this.

[OneCourageous]

wow we never had these problems before on our airplanes... hmm I wonder why these suicide bombers are trying to kill us. Sure isn't for our freedoms.

[STAR6440]

They hate American

[OneCourageous]

couldnt be because we are bombing the shit of of their families now could it? I would hate whoever was trying to conquer my land too.

[MoneyIsSilver]

could it be that CBS and the rest of the jewish media just made this shit up to justify us invading another of Israel's enemies? Do these Jews just want to kill everyone? Since the TSA doesn't bother with bomb sniffers or practical police work, let's get DNA destroying body scanners in the airports, so the jews can kill Americans too.

[WebAnt]

Seems like you have a thing against Jews and the last person i would ever trust to tell me the truth is someone with biases and prejudices. Such people tend to be irrational and not too bright.

[MoneyIsSilver]

And your response is oh so typical. It's not a bias at all, its a realization of who runs the planet.

Research the tribe of Dan - one of the original 12 tribes of Israel.

[WebAnt]

Let's say that you are correct. What good does it do to even point out who runs the planet when there is nothing anybody can do about it? Most people are really too busy trying to tend to their own lives to try to fight against the powers that be. I just really do not see any point in obsessing about what you obsess about. The only thing you are probably accomplishing is raising your blood pressure.

[STAR6440]

Don't get me wrong I am a American citizen and I do hate what American people has become over the years, all they have in there heart is nothing but hate them self. If I speak my mine mind the whole world need to die cause there is no love.

[WebAnt]

The American people are not the problem. Our leaders are. Even if we express that what we want is the opposite of what they are doing,they will not listen to us. Consider illegal immigration. The American people have made it clear that they are against it and want no path to citizenship for illegals and they have expressed that for years but the onslaught of illegals from Mexico has not slowed down a bit. And,in the minds of many politicians,a path to citizenship is still a viable idea. Sad.

[STAR6440]

we all are the problem because we vote these people in office than cry about things not going are way. For as illegal immigration (not just from Mexico you have Belize, Philippines,India etc). They tell u in a min they don't what to go home because the have it good in the U.S, its a little to late cause the freaking country going broken. They come over to the united state and live off the hog than in there own country.

[WebAnt]

We are not exactly given the best choices in terms of candidates and the only way for any of us to ensure that we do not put bad people in office is to not bother voting. The only ones truly to blame for illegal immigration are our officials who are supposed to uphold our immigration laws but are deliberately failing miserably to do so. I do not blame illegals for wanting to come here and make things better for themselves and their families. I still oppose illegal immigration though.

[diah4]

Im pissed off that he portrayed himself as something he's not. We're doomed with him as a leader. smdh at the deception. Something is brewing.

[AQUARIUM1984WTW]

Just blow up earth for god's sake cause i dont see anything right coming out you people mouths stand up for you selves. But at the end of the day you will always be controled and im not talk to us im talking to the ones who put this info out get ready 2010 is going to be real hell i HATE this country and the ones who are really in charge of this world and i hope you read this cause we are ready for what you give and say!!!!! NO MORE WHITE LIES!!

[Spartan3oo]

Learn how to spell

[AQUARIUM1984WTW]

Wow out of all i said you want to say learn how to spell damn when will people just STOP HuH!!

[rockinaustin1]

This is good.