"OFP" Dragon Rising is... well, it's OK, after some moddin (better AI, Island War etc.). I still prefer Arma II, it's better in every way possible, although I've enjoyed both games so far. =)
Arma 2 is more realistic, looks better also. OFP 2 DR isn't that realistic, but it's still better than COD or Battlefield, OFP 2 also has worse graphics, they use bloom and sun glare or what it's called to try and make it look better.
Arma 2 is harder and more complicated, while OFP 2 is easier more fun to play I guess. Depends if you're in the mood for a more tough game, or just don't have the energy for it and go for OFP 2, barely played them but that's what I think so far
Actually arma 2 sounds are supposed to be realistic so no dragon rising doesnt have better sounds. Handling in dragon rising is clearly more FPS based and not simulated very much on real life like arma. Graphics wise, arma also wins, more detail on things like tanks and helicoters.
Content wise arma 2 alo wins. seriously people, don't be afraid of arma just because it looks complicated, it really isn't. Dragon rising is like the demo version of arma. 1/15 the content/abilities.
@PlaneAU the sounds in operation flashpoint were recorded using real military vehicles and weapons so yes the sounds are much better on op flash than on arma 2
Sorry guys, but ArmA 2 is a better game. ArmA and ArmA 2 reminds me of why the original Operation Flashpoint grabbed me so hard and sucked me in. It feels realistic, and puts you out in the field to fend for yourself, however you decide to do it. There just aren't many games like that.
Ofp: DR is just another console rail shooter like CoD, done a million times before.
Perhaps you prefer this - fine. But you can't compare these games as they are not even in the same genre.
Ofpdr is better than arma because arma focus's on only pc so they have a lot of time to fix theirs ofpdr is ps3 pc and xbox so they can't spend too much money on one console so the other ones are bad
@inobrandon The reason you stated actually makes ARMA better. If a developer has to focus on one platform only, they don't have to cater to the lowest common denominator, consoles.
What lets op flash dragon rising down is that the multiplayer is the laggiest multiplayer ever, also soldiers get tons of health and takes like 6 shots to kill!!!
@787391 No, its a silly arcade shooter that pretends towards realism. Check out ArmA 2: Combined Operations, its the only milsim of its kind worth looking at.
if u wanna compare them as realistic game ofpdr is for u. why? because nobody can see himself 3rd person view. if u get close to trees in arma2 they look like crap. if u look at M16A4 in arma and in ofp and on google u'll see ofp2's m16 look better.
look at your own hand then arma2's then ofp'2 wich one is more realistic of course ofp2's. in arma2 it doesent show reloading but in ofp2 it does.
Iam not saying aram2 is bad ( i love it) but people should stop saying its better than ofp2.
@maziarandmelisa All of the units, models and textures in arma 2 are better quality, OFP:DR just uses cheap tricks with post processing to make it look better. Remember arma 2 is a combat simulator, DR is just an FPS that tries to freeload off the BIS innovation, but doesn't even get close to the mark, a failed compromise. More importantly, is you play Arma as it is meant to be played, in expert mode, there is no 3rd person view or hud.
@maziarandmelisa All of the units, models and textures in arma 2 are better quality, OFP:DR just uses cheap tricks with post processing to make it look better. Remember arma 2 is a combat simulator, DR is just an FPS that tries to freeload off the BIS innovation, but doesn't even get close to the mark, a failed compromise. More importantly, if you play Arma as it is meant to be played, in expert mode, there is no 3rd person view or hud. DR was a true disappointment, but not a surprise.
@wsnelp The graphics are some of the best available, you must be running it on something under-powered, either that or you are a COD kid that simply doesn't know what 'good' looks like, impressed by shiny flashy things rather than substance and detail, like most kids these days.
Do you always insult people who disagree? And what's this about dragging COD in every discussion about this game? For your information little boy, I was already playing computer games in the late seventies, long before you were born and I know ugly graphics when I see them. On top of that, I run a graphics design site with close to 1.8 million a year for over 6 years, so yes, I know what good graphics are.
First of all the landscapes look terrible. Even a 2 year old game called "TheHunter" looks light years better than this game. And since you drag COD into this; a chapter like "Excodus" in Call of Duty MW2 show an incredible amount of detail and realism, the lighting is actually on of the best I've ever seen in any computer game.
@wsnelp Also, the landscapes look incredible, apparently you only like the fake romantic pastoral imaginings aimed at small children, anything based on real satellite terrain data is apparently not good enough for you. I think you might just be sour that you can't afford the PC required to run this well, or perhaps you simply don't know how to optimise a game as demanding as this. It probably isn't for people like you. Ah there you have the example of MW2 lol, argument over, you are a COD kid.
@wsnelp Perhaps most importantly, your ignorance is revealed by your comparison of an MW2 level to an Arma 2 map. The comparison is laughable and also frustrating because where to begin? COD levels are coridoors - allowing for the designer to create a 'visual stream' for the viewer, knowing exactly where they will be throughout the level, basically directing your eyes as there is no freedom. ArmA has no coridoors, if you need me to explain anything further then you truly are an idiot.
@7th75thCallaghan By the way I have been talking about ArmA 2 the whole time, not OFP2, which does look like crap, as it relies on those post-process lighting tricks that you seem to love. ArmA 2 does not hide anything, which is why it looks a little rough around the edges, but still beautiful in its fidelity. MW2 lacks that fidelity.
@wsnelp No just people who clearly lack any ability to see good graphics, apparently all your time spent with CAD has simply lead you to forget what good looks like. I don't care when you started playing games, or how old you are - ArmA 2 has some of the best graphics out there and I stand by that. As a simulator the importance is realistic detailed wireframe models (which, in arma are certainly the best in any game out there), high res textures (again, above any game) and anims. PP not so imp.
@wsnelp Maybe you'd like to give us a point of reference by letting us know what you think good? Probably Crysis and the like. It seems you can't tell the difference between well rendered graphics and a few post-processing tricks that cover up a lack of fidelity. Until you have run 'OA' in 1080p HD @ 200% 3D resolution with EVERYTHING on V High including SSAA on 24x edge detect and 16x AF and 10km draw distance, you dont know what arma can look like.
Just to show all people what a clown you are to claim that this game has great graphics, here's an in game comparison with CAD MW2: alturl . com / fymzt (remove blanks)
@wPacificadorw OFP:DR is not a simulator by any means, it pulls off some cheap tricks to trick console kids that don't know any better into thinking it is some kind of simulator. ArmA is based off a military-grade simulator; OFP-DR is based off a contrived model designed by a marketing team that knows nothing of combat or simulation, that is all any potential customer should need to know. There is a reason military personell play arma and not ofp:dr.
OFP2 is a great ready to play tactical shooter in that it puts you in the mission and leaves you to complete them with your own tactics, id compare it more to the first ghost recon than the first flashpoint. ARMA II is an attempt at a full immersive war experience, but the single player campaign is broken and full of bugs, you NEED to mod it. Arma II is more of a mission editor with a game than a game with a mission editor. I like them both equally, but arma is more of a template than a game.
@MjXllcommando In other words, it is a simulator, with a game layer on top, to make it easier for people new to simulators to approach. It is wrong to call it a template - BIS offer us a comprehensive combat simulating engine for us to mod and do what we want with. To call it a template is to suggest it lacks content - it has more 'game' content than the vast majority of mainstream releases. The single player campaign is an after-thought, and so it should be unless they hire from outside.
@MjXllcommando It does not 'suck ass', i'd in fact venture to say that it is hands down the most powerful AI system in any simulator out there, and one of the only 'games' with real AI. What are you comparing it to? Most games dont have 'AI', just a simple series of instructions to make the enemy shoot at you, ArmA actually has multi-thread AI. If you find it sucking, it is simply because you are not using it correctly. Try using OPSMON and ZEUS AI and see how it works.
@MjXllcommando When was the last time you tried it? Talk is cheap, come by our server tonight (7-75th Rangers) and see how quickly you are outsmarted, outmaneuvered and out-shot by our AI opponents. You will need ACE mod for Arrowhead/Combined Ops and our 7-75th Mod pack available from our website. You will see the AI suppressing and flanking, smoking cover and dragging their wounded off to be healed, clearing buildings and hunting you down for hours without giving up.
@MjXllcommando Ah well that's where you (and probably most others who dont adore this game) are going wrong.. This game must not be treated like some mainstream release by EA or DICE or something, this game needs attention and research. It has the best modding community hands down - the basic rule for ArmA is this, 'If you can imagine a combat scenario, you can recreate it in game.' ArmA basically allows us to experience any conceivable aspect of warfare but it demands that we put time into it.
@MjXllcommando Here are the websites that will change how you see ArmA 2. wwwDOTArmaholicDOTcom
wwwDOTArmedAssaultDOTinfo also check out the BIS forums under 'Addons and mods, released'. If you want an enhanced experience, try downloading: WarFX blastcore; JSRS sounds; Zeus AI; Mando Missile.
If you want more realism and twice as much content, try ACE mod, we have a tutorial on our website (check my channel for link) on how to install it, but as yet it will not work with blastcore....
@7th75thCallaghan You must be on drugs to think that any of those mods will make the crappy animations and graphics in ARMA 2 look a so much better! lol Take for a example a car, drive it in 1st or 3rd person...no mod is going to fix issues like that and mind you, that's just a car!
arma 2 is way more fun, dragon rising just feels awkward i knew there was somthing odd about the game when i looked at it, good thing i downloaded the demo first or i would of bought it.
Fr3ak, I gotta admit, you're wrong on sound, for instance the M1A1 in OFDR sounds rubbish (it sounds like a muscle car with a broken engine) whereas the M1A1 in Arma 2 sounds very realistic. The handling could be slightly better but that's probably the only thing OFDR has on ARMA 2.
All in all, i found that ARMA 2, while providing insane amounts of realism, didn't really have intense, prolonged, tactical firefights, whereas in Dragon Rising, battles between you and your 3 men and 4 - 5 other soldiers could last anywhere from 10 seconds, to as much as 5 minutes. After playing each though, i realized something, THERE TWO VERY DIFFERENT FUCKING GAMES, they both have their cons and pro's and they both cater to different play styles.
in all honesty, ARMA 2 is a very good game in its own right, but i found that controlling your squad was WAAAY more easy and versatile in Dragon Rising then it was it A2. I also thought night vision looked better in Dragon Rising then it did in A2, but with it off, Arma 2 was definately the winner in terms of graphics. Also, the AI seems to have a tendency to have superhuman abilities sometimes, and there were moments where i looked at the AI for 3 seconds 10 feet away before they fired.
@bud389 Erm, they kinda hide it but the 1-10 keys when used with your squad give you so many options. and ARMA 2 does have prolonged tactical firefights, for instance when your squad is holed up in a building taking fire from a BMP-2 and multiple footmobiles, you have to think if you should risk running to the next building, calling for air support, or just holding out for reinforcements. While I agree they're different, the problem with that is it's an excuse used too often.
@bud389 "Arma 2 was definately the winner in terms of graphics."
Get real, bot games suck at graphics and animation! How the fuck can you claim that the graphics are good??? I can name at least 50 games with wayyyyy better graphics.
@wsnelp If you mention a single Modern Warfare game your opinion instantly doesn't count, because they dont have better graphics. And maxxed out, ARMA 2 looks pretty damn impressive.
@bud389 "your opinion instantly doesn't count"? How childish. What an unreasonable way to structure a debate. The whole point of opinions is that they are subjective, so by saying that someone else's opinion doesn't count because it's different is perfectly illustrating how subjective you are. I'd say that was pretty ironic, but hey, I'm not you so my opinion probably doesn't count.
@tomedkins I don't make the rules, i just follow them, Modern Warfare isn't a game, it's peice of childish shit that should be thrown into a cess pit.
@bud389 Wow. Firstly, it's spelled "piece". Secondly, how are you following the "rules" by saying you don't like a game? You're using clichés that aren't even relevant to what we're talking about. I happen to find Moden Warfare a bit boring too, but everyone's entitled to like different stuff, there's no need to be so inflammatory. It's really depressing how people are so aggressive on these forums.
we all know OFP is just a name now, i found this game too easy and unchallenging, i was bored within a day and back on A2, its clearly made for console casuals.
ArmA2 has its fare share of lol wtf is this sh*t moments, but it is by far the better game and much more realistic....jus my 2 pence n e wayz
@198cvx OFP2 does not have dedicated servers for PC. To get a game going, one person has to host a server from their machine with a shitty upload speed which causes lag for everyone else.
Arma 2 outshadows OFP:DR in realism and in looks. If it didnt than why the hell does the US army use Arma's engine to train their soldiers?
So for every ignorant person saying Arma 2 is unrealistic... Than tell me why armies (not only the USarmy) uses VBS2 to train their soldiers!! VBS2 is Arma 2 with some downgraded graphics and some added scripts and commands.
@Trinitrotoluo um i never said it was made for consoles like this dumbass because OFP has all kinds of awsome stuff for pc like map editor and level editorso you can play as the chinese fending off against the U.S plus the army uses that terrible game called AA3 to train their soldieres.
@Chickenhunter9 Sorry to break it to you but they dont, They might use it for some things for training like using the grenade launcher but the main game they use Is VBS2 (VBS2 uses Arma2's engine) Look it up and you'll see.
@Gregoric399 i was about to type the same thing! lol i have same setup as this guy but with a 1gb 9800 gt and that still lags on very high settings. high works ok tho.
i will play ofpdr tomorrow or tonight i can´t review a video game without playin it! ArmA1 is the best game! okay arma2 has the better graphic and something else but the fun is not so big as in arma1!
@Steggman I think the same i know a lot of people who were pissed about this game. If it hadn't the "operation Flashpoint" in its title people would have been more open minded and less criticising. But if you played OFP1 and then were looking forward to DR... Playing it and noticing most promises were fake or hardly noticable in the game - many people (including me) felt ripped off.
@198cvx I own both,OFP looks better,renders better, easy controls, crap online as you have no support or dedicated servers, i.e you cant just join a server that is launched into a game.
Arma2 does not look as good, but better online play - you have more servers (dedicated) that you can just turn up and join anytime you wish. Normally the servers are very populated.
@pintofshite yeah it sucks that there are no dedicated servers
but remember that ofdr is squad based multiplayer so if u joined a match the team your on gets another additional squad of units and they crush the enemy
arma 2 has dedicated servers whichare awsome but if there were dedicated servers in ofdr then before the game starts the host can drive all the vehicles onto his side of the map and use up all the ammo on the mounted guns on the opponents side of the map
@198cvx Good point, i had DR first and loved it in fact you could not get me off of it, I even created 3 of my own multiplayer maps.
But to me I prefer person v person and no ai,and having to wait in the multiplayer lobby for somebody to lauch an infiltration was a PITA. Also another thing on DR (unless it is my eyes) it is quite easy to TK as the PLA and USMC uniforms are quite similar.
Arma2 to me is not as much a sequal, it is more of a Arma1 port onto better terrain and object detail.
ArmA 2 Lacks Optimization,There Are Like A Hundred Different Buttons For Something That Could Be Done With 2 Buttons,And The Graphic Engine Is One Of The Most Under optimized Engines Ever,As A Result Most People Won't Really Be Able To Play It Anyway,,,And This Is Where OFDR Capitalizes,So OFPR Wins In This Department...
ArmA 2 Lacks Optimization,There Are Like A Hundred Different Buttons For Something That Could Be Done With 2 Buttons,And The Graphic Engine Although Better Looking Than OFDR Is Terribly Optimized,As A Result Most People Won't Really Be Able To Play It Anyway,,,And This Is Where OFDR Capitalizes,So OFPR Wins In This Department...
i want arma2 but my computer hasnt got enough memory so i asked my m8 hu has it hes said its like operation flashpoint n its awesome but not as good so i wish in the future i can get a bigger memory pc
different games, operation flashpoint 1 was a bohemia game, it wasnt the usual game everybody played, thats why some of us loved it and got used to it, expected it as well...then dragon rising was a complete mess in my eyes, as ofp1 with the y2k3 mod is still a very resourceful game, even today, dragon rising failed to reach that by a longshot.
Arma 2 retains some of the way how operation flashpoint was and i think maxing it full up it looks way harder than DR.
incomparable content, people have to have an extended appreciation for combat. That indeed is not everyone. In all, the game was a success, even if it was not a hit amongst consumers. A 9.0 for its lone existence and methodical gameplay.
Read parts 1 2 and this final part to get a good insight on OPFlash: DR.
(PART 2) This game is more of a simulator that can be entertaining only if you have developed a taste for this style of gameplay. It is slow but rewarding. It is tactical but engaging. It is difficult at times but surprising. Operation Flashpoint has all the attributes of a good FPS.
I loved it instantly, especially because I know that this game is the last of its kind. I get the impression that the only way to comprehend DRAGON RISING and its
A Player review on gamespot his rate on the games was 9.0 (Superb)
I will make it simple and short. Expecting everyone to appreciate an art piece in the same manner is close to impossible. This game delivers in almost all aspects in single player. However it does fall a bit short on the multiplayer end of it. With that said, I agree that games should be made to be entertaining and fun
@198cvx I just got the game a couple of hours ago and it is BEAST!!! I cant believe that there r people ho do not like this game, even wen i suck at it im still having fun so god bless ofdr fans and god bless codemasters for making a beautiful game and hopefully another beautiful game with the next installment of operation flashpoint (opf red river)
flashpoints grafics are much better and the controls are much simpler plus its much less complicated to order your squad around but arma 2 has better editors...
but operation flashpoint is better because it is more intense wheras in arma 2 u just run around and gun people running past u and when your injured it takes a damn long time for your comrades to heal u
also in flashpoint u can see bullets fly and its less random than arma 2
@198cvx ArmA2's engines are literally years ahead of DR. And do you honestly think you're going to be able to see a small piece of metal flying through the air at many times the speed of sound? That's why tracers had to be invented and you can see those in ArmA2 and in real life. If you've come to DR and ArmA from the arcade games like CoD and BFBC I can see why you would think DR is better, because those games are designed for graphics whores and kids, and tbh, they even do a bad job of that.
@198cvx I worded that wrong, sorry I was talking about CoD when I said that. And there are games that have much better graphics than bfbc2, but bfbc2's graphics are quite good. Sorry for the confusion. On the note of realism, DR is pseudo-realism. Its not actually realistic. Aiming above a target to compensate for bullet drop is hollywood bullshit, that's the whole point in the dials on the scope. Unfortunately in ArmA2, you can't zero the scope, but its really the only unrealistic thing in it.
@kerranghighvoltage On some missions yes you have a time limit, for example, the second mission you have to destroy two anti ship missils before there launched and and entire fleet is destroyed..
"OFP" Dragon Rising is... well, it's OK, after some moddin (better AI, Island War etc.). I still prefer Arma II, it's better in every way possible, although I've enjoyed both games so far. =)
GrandElemental 3 weeks ago
OFP wins in 1st person animations - reloading and such. Not much else I can say.
sockschappercat 1 month ago
Arma 2 is more realistic, looks better also. OFP 2 DR isn't that realistic, but it's still better than COD or Battlefield, OFP 2 also has worse graphics, they use bloom and sun glare or what it's called to try and make it look better.
Arma 2 is harder and more complicated, while OFP 2 is easier more fun to play I guess. Depends if you're in the mood for a more tough game, or just don't have the energy for it and go for OFP 2, barely played them but that's what I think so far
Silbiu23 1 month ago
Actually arma 2 sounds are supposed to be realistic so no dragon rising doesnt have better sounds. Handling in dragon rising is clearly more FPS based and not simulated very much on real life like arma. Graphics wise, arma also wins, more detail on things like tanks and helicoters.
Content wise arma 2 alo wins. seriously people, don't be afraid of arma just because it looks complicated, it really isn't. Dragon rising is like the demo version of arma. 1/15 the content/abilities.
PlaneAU 3 months ago
@PlaneAU the sounds in operation flashpoint were recorded using real military vehicles and weapons so yes the sounds are much better on op flash than on arma 2
ultraT230 1 month ago
track please!!!
loupcb 3 months ago
opf look more like a ordinary fps, arma kicks ass
4MikiMr 4 months ago
So what do you guys say witch one is better and froget the suff about graphics with my experience the point goes to OF
Samuli385 5 months ago
So what do you guys say witch one is better and froget the suff about graphics with my experience the point goes to OF
Samuli385 5 months ago
@YourFavoriteGames I agree I still play 8 bit nes games and i don't mind about graphics
Samuli385 5 months ago
And guys a realistic shooter on console? It didn't work on pc you can give 1-3 commandos in one seconds !
On console that would take 5 seconds and than you haven't any more troops because they were all shot down that don't work
And in ofp 2 you can't move when you give commandos to your troops.
Than in ofp 2 checkpoints?
When you reach a checkpoint your troops where alive is that realistic? No!
Ofp 2 have no right for the name Operation flashpoint
Arma 2 is more ofp as ofp 2
Awesome16544 6 months ago
Guys ofp cold war crisis+resistanc+redhammer is the best game!
Arma 2 is a better ofp "succeser" as ofp dragon rising
Ofp dragon rising haven't the ofp feeling from the first ofp
Ofp 2 is ***
Awesome16544 6 months ago
operation flashpoint 2 dragon rising is better
alex1382aaa 6 months ago
Sorry guys, but ArmA 2 is a better game. ArmA and ArmA 2 reminds me of why the original Operation Flashpoint grabbed me so hard and sucked me in. It feels realistic, and puts you out in the field to fend for yourself, however you decide to do it. There just aren't many games like that.
Ofp: DR is just another console rail shooter like CoD, done a million times before.
Perhaps you prefer this - fine. But you can't compare these games as they are not even in the same genre.
rmzalbar 7 months ago
Bfbc2 owns all
codfanforlife34 7 months ago
Ofpdr is better than arma because arma focus's on only pc so they have a lot of time to fix theirs ofpdr is ps3 pc and xbox so they can't spend too much money on one console so the other ones are bad
inobrandon 7 months ago
@inobrandon The reason you stated actually makes ARMA better. If a developer has to focus on one platform only, they don't have to cater to the lowest common denominator, consoles.
P3RF3CTD3ATH 7 months ago
@inobrandon That is the absolute most dumbest reason i have ever heard Arma 2 clrely is the supirour game
MrVerstingen 7 months ago
Heh, the highest rated comment here is about ArmA 2's system requirements :)
3DMasterST 8 months ago
What lets op flash dragon rising down is that the multiplayer is the laggiest multiplayer ever, also soldiers get tons of health and takes like 6 shots to kill!!!
WDFtechno 11 months ago 4
Operation Flashpoint 2: Dragon Rising it is good?
787391 1 year ago
@787391 No, its a silly arcade shooter that pretends towards realism. Check out ArmA 2: Combined Operations, its the only milsim of its kind worth looking at.
7th75thCallaghan 11 months ago
OF have the graphic but Arma 2 have the felling :!
Asken96 1 year ago
if u wanna compare them as realistic game ofpdr is for u. why? because nobody can see himself 3rd person view. if u get close to trees in arma2 they look like crap. if u look at M16A4 in arma and in ofp and on google u'll see ofp2's m16 look better.
look at your own hand then arma2's then ofp'2 wich one is more realistic of course ofp2's. in arma2 it doesent show reloading but in ofp2 it does.
Iam not saying aram2 is bad ( i love it) but people should stop saying its better than ofp2.
maziarandmelisa 1 year ago
@maziarandmelisa All of the units, models and textures in arma 2 are better quality, OFP:DR just uses cheap tricks with post processing to make it look better. Remember arma 2 is a combat simulator, DR is just an FPS that tries to freeload off the BIS innovation, but doesn't even get close to the mark, a failed compromise. More importantly, is you play Arma as it is meant to be played, in expert mode, there is no 3rd person view or hud.
7th75thCallaghan 11 months ago
@maziarandmelisa All of the units, models and textures in arma 2 are better quality, OFP:DR just uses cheap tricks with post processing to make it look better. Remember arma 2 is a combat simulator, DR is just an FPS that tries to freeload off the BIS innovation, but doesn't even get close to the mark, a failed compromise. More importantly, if you play Arma as it is meant to be played, in expert mode, there is no 3rd person view or hud. DR was a true disappointment, but not a surprise.
7th75thCallaghan 11 months ago 8
Arma 2 looks more complicated
TheLegacy1902 1 year ago
Nothing will ever beat the Arma series, end of discussion.
joezetank 1 year ago 3
@joezetank ofp2 just did idiot
maziarandmelisa 1 year ago
Arma 2 is the better simulator, but the graphics and animations suck monkey balls....not that OFP2 is any better lol
wsnelp 1 year ago
@wsnelp The graphics are some of the best available, you must be running it on something under-powered, either that or you are a COD kid that simply doesn't know what 'good' looks like, impressed by shiny flashy things rather than substance and detail, like most kids these days.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan "The graphics are some of the best available"
Do you always insult people who disagree? And what's this about dragging COD in every discussion about this game? For your information little boy, I was already playing computer games in the late seventies, long before you were born and I know ugly graphics when I see them. On top of that, I run a graphics design site with close to 1.8 million a year for over 6 years, so yes, I know what good graphics are.
wsnelp 1 year ago
First of all the landscapes look terrible. Even a 2 year old game called "TheHunter" looks light years better than this game. And since you drag COD into this; a chapter like "Excodus" in Call of Duty MW2 show an incredible amount of detail and realism, the lighting is actually on of the best I've ever seen in any computer game.
wsnelp 1 year ago
OFP2 simply pales in comparison. All the graphics in OFP2 look muddy, boring, desaturated, flat.
Type for example in Google images: operation flashpoint dragon rising
All the images are reddish/brown, green, it looks terrible.
wsnelp 1 year ago
@wsnelp who would have thought war looked reddish/ brown and green. besides type in arma 2 in google images and see what it comes up with
dmied1 1 year ago
@wsnelp Also, the landscapes look incredible, apparently you only like the fake romantic pastoral imaginings aimed at small children, anything based on real satellite terrain data is apparently not good enough for you. I think you might just be sour that you can't afford the PC required to run this well, or perhaps you simply don't know how to optimise a game as demanding as this. It probably isn't for people like you. Ah there you have the example of MW2 lol, argument over, you are a COD kid.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@wsnelp Perhaps most importantly, your ignorance is revealed by your comparison of an MW2 level to an Arma 2 map. The comparison is laughable and also frustrating because where to begin? COD levels are coridoors - allowing for the designer to create a 'visual stream' for the viewer, knowing exactly where they will be throughout the level, basically directing your eyes as there is no freedom. ArmA has no coridoors, if you need me to explain anything further then you truly are an idiot.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan By the way I have been talking about ArmA 2 the whole time, not OFP2, which does look like crap, as it relies on those post-process lighting tricks that you seem to love. ArmA 2 does not hide anything, which is why it looks a little rough around the edges, but still beautiful in its fidelity. MW2 lacks that fidelity.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@wsnelp No just people who clearly lack any ability to see good graphics, apparently all your time spent with CAD has simply lead you to forget what good looks like. I don't care when you started playing games, or how old you are - ArmA 2 has some of the best graphics out there and I stand by that. As a simulator the importance is realistic detailed wireframe models (which, in arma are certainly the best in any game out there), high res textures (again, above any game) and anims. PP not so imp.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@wsnelp Maybe you'd like to give us a point of reference by letting us know what you think good? Probably Crysis and the like. It seems you can't tell the difference between well rendered graphics and a few post-processing tricks that cover up a lack of fidelity. Until you have run 'OA' in 1080p HD @ 200% 3D resolution with EVERYTHING on V High including SSAA on 24x edge detect and 16x AF and 10km draw distance, you dont know what arma can look like.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan
Just to show all people what a clown you are to claim that this game has great graphics, here's an in game comparison with CAD MW2: alturl . com / fymzt (remove blanks)
OFP2 clearly looks like total crap.
wsnelp 1 year ago
@wPacificadorw OFP:DR is not a simulator by any means, it pulls off some cheap tricks to trick console kids that don't know any better into thinking it is some kind of simulator. ArmA is based off a military-grade simulator; OFP-DR is based off a contrived model designed by a marketing team that knows nothing of combat or simulation, that is all any potential customer should need to know. There is a reason military personell play arma and not ofp:dr.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@wPacificadorw arma 2
198cvx 1 year ago
ARMA 2 is the real successor to Operation Flashpoint 1. DR feels like a dumbed down version of OpFp 1.
10samm10 1 year ago
@wPacificadorw arma is best at being tactical shooter but not best game ever.......
198cvx 1 year ago
@wPacificadorw actually dragon rising still belongs in the tactical shooters section
arma 2 is not god of games
198cvx 1 year ago
omg both games are good
wat ever happened to playing a game for fun
no one gives a fuck if your dad is a navy seal and says arma 2 is more realistic(which it is in some elements)
some people just prefer the style of dragon rising and thats fine ive always been a fan of the flashpoint series so i understand
flashpoint isnt bad its just a little different from the first one and is still alot of fun mr hardcore gamers
BTW i love arma 2 as well:)
198cvx 1 year ago
OFP2 is a great ready to play tactical shooter in that it puts you in the mission and leaves you to complete them with your own tactics, id compare it more to the first ghost recon than the first flashpoint. ARMA II is an attempt at a full immersive war experience, but the single player campaign is broken and full of bugs, you NEED to mod it. Arma II is more of a mission editor with a game than a game with a mission editor. I like them both equally, but arma is more of a template than a game.
MjXllcommando 1 year ago
@MjXllcommando In other words, it is a simulator, with a game layer on top, to make it easier for people new to simulators to approach. It is wrong to call it a template - BIS offer us a comprehensive combat simulating engine for us to mod and do what we want with. To call it a template is to suggest it lacks content - it has more 'game' content than the vast majority of mainstream releases. The single player campaign is an after-thought, and so it should be unless they hire from outside.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan i see. I just wish the AI in Arma 2 didnt suck so much ass, its actually worse than OFP1
MjXllcommando 1 year ago
@MjXllcommando It does not 'suck ass', i'd in fact venture to say that it is hands down the most powerful AI system in any simulator out there, and one of the only 'games' with real AI. What are you comparing it to? Most games dont have 'AI', just a simple series of instructions to make the enemy shoot at you, ArmA actually has multi-thread AI. If you find it sucking, it is simply because you are not using it correctly. Try using OPSMON and ZEUS AI and see how it works.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@MjXllcommando When was the last time you tried it? Talk is cheap, come by our server tonight (7-75th Rangers) and see how quickly you are outsmarted, outmaneuvered and out-shot by our AI opponents. You will need ACE mod for Arrowhead/Combined Ops and our 7-75th Mod pack available from our website. You will see the AI suppressing and flanking, smoking cover and dragging their wounded off to be healed, clearing buildings and hunting you down for hours without giving up.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan ill give it a try then, i was referring to the vanilla game.
MjXllcommando 1 year ago
@MjXllcommando Ah well that's where you (and probably most others who dont adore this game) are going wrong.. This game must not be treated like some mainstream release by EA or DICE or something, this game needs attention and research. It has the best modding community hands down - the basic rule for ArmA is this, 'If you can imagine a combat scenario, you can recreate it in game.' ArmA basically allows us to experience any conceivable aspect of warfare but it demands that we put time into it.
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@MjXllcommando Here are the websites that will change how you see ArmA 2. wwwDOTArmaholicDOTcom
wwwDOTArmedAssaultDOTinfo also check out the BIS forums under 'Addons and mods, released'. If you want an enhanced experience, try downloading: WarFX blastcore; JSRS sounds; Zeus AI; Mando Missile.
If you want more realism and twice as much content, try ACE mod, we have a tutorial on our website (check my channel for link) on how to install it, but as yet it will not work with blastcore....
7th75thCallaghan 1 year ago
@7th75thCallaghan You must be on drugs to think that any of those mods will make the crappy animations and graphics in ARMA 2 look a so much better! lol Take for a example a car, drive it in 1st or 3rd person...no mod is going to fix issues like that and mind you, that's just a car!
wsnelp 1 year ago
flashpoint has so much Bloom, it looks unrealistic.
and is it just me or are the sights on flashpoint stretched out.
shadow15555555555 1 year ago
ARMA 2 <3
MilosCsrb 1 year ago
I preffered Operfation Flashpoint 2 actually :P
grineti5 1 year ago
@grineti5 check out Arma 2 Operation Arrowhead!
This will blow your mind! Its FANTASTIC!!
now seriously its a really good game!
bodyboystance2 1 year ago
@bodyboystance2 No it's not. The simulation is good, but oh my God...the graphics and animations look like crap from 2001
wsnelp 1 year ago
@wsnelp
yeah animations are really not a strong point but dude...
have you ever seen Arma 2 OA maxed out?!?!?!
you should because currently there is no competition to it!
Its blowing your mind!
bodyboystance2 1 year ago
Shit vs Arma2
BlackOps78321 1 year ago
@BlackOps78321 I wouldn't call a OF shit, But it can't beat Arma 2
InternetVideoGamer 1 year ago 16
arma 2 is way more fun, dragon rising just feels awkward i knew there was somthing odd about the game when i looked at it, good thing i downloaded the demo first or i would of bought it.
Theslydonkey 1 year ago
Fr3ak, I gotta admit, you're wrong on sound, for instance the M1A1 in OFDR sounds rubbish (it sounds like a muscle car with a broken engine) whereas the M1A1 in Arma 2 sounds very realistic. The handling could be slightly better but that's probably the only thing OFDR has on ARMA 2.
dudeaid 1 year ago
-CONTINUED
All in all, i found that ARMA 2, while providing insane amounts of realism, didn't really have intense, prolonged, tactical firefights, whereas in Dragon Rising, battles between you and your 3 men and 4 - 5 other soldiers could last anywhere from 10 seconds, to as much as 5 minutes. After playing each though, i realized something, THERE TWO VERY DIFFERENT FUCKING GAMES, they both have their cons and pro's and they both cater to different play styles.
bud389 1 year ago
in all honesty, ARMA 2 is a very good game in its own right, but i found that controlling your squad was WAAAY more easy and versatile in Dragon Rising then it was it A2. I also thought night vision looked better in Dragon Rising then it did in A2, but with it off, Arma 2 was definately the winner in terms of graphics. Also, the AI seems to have a tendency to have superhuman abilities sometimes, and there were moments where i looked at the AI for 3 seconds 10 feet away before they fired.
bud389 1 year ago
@bud389 Erm, they kinda hide it but the 1-10 keys when used with your squad give you so many options. and ARMA 2 does have prolonged tactical firefights, for instance when your squad is holed up in a building taking fire from a BMP-2 and multiple footmobiles, you have to think if you should risk running to the next building, calling for air support, or just holding out for reinforcements. While I agree they're different, the problem with that is it's an excuse used too often.
dudeaid 1 year ago
@bud389 "Arma 2 was definately the winner in terms of graphics."
Get real, bot games suck at graphics and animation! How the fuck can you claim that the graphics are good??? I can name at least 50 games with wayyyyy better graphics.
wsnelp 1 year ago
@wsnelp If you mention a single Modern Warfare game your opinion instantly doesn't count, because they dont have better graphics. And maxxed out, ARMA 2 looks pretty damn impressive.
bud389 1 year ago
@bud389 "your opinion instantly doesn't count"? How childish. What an unreasonable way to structure a debate. The whole point of opinions is that they are subjective, so by saying that someone else's opinion doesn't count because it's different is perfectly illustrating how subjective you are. I'd say that was pretty ironic, but hey, I'm not you so my opinion probably doesn't count.
tomedkins 8 months ago
@tomedkins I don't make the rules, i just follow them, Modern Warfare isn't a game, it's peice of childish shit that should be thrown into a cess pit.
bud389 8 months ago
@bud389 Wow. Firstly, it's spelled "piece". Secondly, how are you following the "rules" by saying you don't like a game? You're using clichés that aren't even relevant to what we're talking about. I happen to find Moden Warfare a bit boring too, but everyone's entitled to like different stuff, there's no need to be so inflammatory. It's really depressing how people are so aggressive on these forums.
tomedkins 8 months ago
@tomedkins These aren't forums, these are videos.
bud389 8 months ago
@bud389 Well aren't you clever.
tomedkins 8 months ago
@tomedkins INORITE?!
bud389 8 months ago
ArmA2 > OFPDR
we all know OFP is just a name now, i found this game too easy and unchallenging, i was bored within a day and back on A2, its clearly made for console casuals.
ArmA2 has its fare share of lol wtf is this sh*t moments, but it is by far the better game and much more realistic....jus my 2 pence n e wayz
edlin7 1 year ago
@edlin7 yeah right
the pc versons has editor and console dosnt
so pc version is better
meant for sonsoles ma ass
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx So where are the dedicated servers?
P3RF3CTD3ATH 1 year ago
@P3RF3CTD3ATH on flash point?
yeah its got edicated servers......
but i think its pc only
or something...
console version suks ballz
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx OFP2 does not have dedicated servers for PC. To get a game going, one person has to host a server from their machine with a shitty upload speed which causes lag for everyone else.
P3RF3CTD3ATH 1 year ago
@edlin7 oyur a dumb ass
Chickenhunter9 1 year ago
@Chickenhunter9 says a guy who spelled you're oyuar.
Arma 2 outshadows OFP:DR in realism and in looks. If it didnt than why the hell does the US army use Arma's engine to train their soldiers?
So for every ignorant person saying Arma 2 is unrealistic... Than tell me why armies (not only the USarmy) uses VBS2 to train their soldiers!! VBS2 is Arma 2 with some downgraded graphics and some added scripts and commands.
Trinitrotoluo 1 year ago
@Trinitrotoluo um i never said it was made for consoles like this dumbass because OFP has all kinds of awsome stuff for pc like map editor and level editorso you can play as the chinese fending off against the U.S plus the army uses that terrible game called AA3 to train their soldieres.
Chickenhunter9 1 year ago
@Chickenhunter9 Sorry to break it to you but they dont, They might use it for some things for training like using the grenade launcher but the main game they use Is VBS2 (VBS2 uses Arma2's engine) Look it up and you'll see.
Trinitrotoluo 1 year ago
@Chickenhunter9 No they actually use the engine for ARMA 2 called VBS2.
P3RF3CTD3ATH 1 year ago
no way did you max arma 2 out with that hardware
Gregoric399 1 year ago 22
@Gregoric399 i was about to type the same thing! lol i have same setup as this guy but with a 1gb 9800 gt and that still lags on very high settings. high works ok tho.
doylieboy1 1 year ago
I have a question. Why are you using a bboy song? haha just wondering.
randydang14 1 year ago
Arma 2 is better then OFP 2
JazzJaRa 1 year ago 2
i will play ofpdr tomorrow or tonight i can´t review a video game without playin it! ArmA1 is the best game! okay arma2 has the better graphic and something else but the fun is not so big as in arma1!
jannision 1 year ago
like both
pawagnathom 1 year ago
nothing to compare, ofp2 is a basic fps, arma2 is the best war simulator ever made, thats it.
PATRONSKiii 1 year ago
opf1 = arma armed assult = amra 2
cod 1 = cod 2 = cod 3 =etc. = opf2
wiktor1998 1 year ago
arma je honě dobrá ale u mě je OFP lepší
pikaprd 1 year ago
i hate arma 2 cause every time you ned a mod (ACE!!)
lukaslukas7316 1 year ago
@lukaslukas7316 You hate a game just because you are lazy to download a mod GROW UP
michke11 1 year ago
@michke11 if i buy me a game i think it should be complete without gaps!
neger
lukaslukas7316 1 year ago
DR can't compare to the immersion level of ArmA 2.
Olemguy 1 year ago
Accesbility and medium realism: Operation flashpoint
Mod community and high realism: Arma 2
CyclonicTuna023 1 year ago
You know what?
I think OFP2 would have been better received if it wasn’t called Operation Flashpoint.
If it was just a shooter called Dragon Rising, i bet it would have done better..
Steggman 1 year ago
@Steggman I think the same i know a lot of people who were pissed about this game. If it hadn't the "operation Flashpoint" in its title people would have been more open minded and less criticising. But if you played OFP1 and then were looking forward to DR... Playing it and noticing most promises were fake or hardly noticable in the game - many people (including me) felt ripped off.
catburglar82 1 year ago
arma 2 has all these controls and options but ofdr has more variety of commands
sooo wats the point of all those controls then?
it took me an hour to find the key to switch to third person
but the i realized i was playing it on a laptop so it didnt have that key
the explosions are dull (more like a woosh of dust)
the explosians in ofdr are more epic and the ground shakes
ofdr is also more grafically gorgeous
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx can i has the drugz that you are takingz.
m4a3e2Sherman 1 year ago
@m4a3e2Sherman wat the fuck are u talking about man?!?!
198cvx 1 year ago
can anyone tell me how arma 2 is better seriouslt?!?!
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx I own both,OFP looks better,renders better, easy controls, crap online as you have no support or dedicated servers, i.e you cant just join a server that is launched into a game.
Arma2 does not look as good, but better online play - you have more servers (dedicated) that you can just turn up and join anytime you wish. Normally the servers are very populated.
So for single player = Dragon Rising.
Multiplayer (PvP) = Arma2
Do no buy Dragon rising just for online play
pintofshite 1 year ago
@pintofshite yeah it sucks that there are no dedicated servers
but remember that ofdr is squad based multiplayer so if u joined a match the team your on gets another additional squad of units and they crush the enemy
arma 2 has dedicated servers whichare awsome but if there were dedicated servers in ofdr then before the game starts the host can drive all the vehicles onto his side of the map and use up all the ammo on the mounted guns on the opponents side of the map
so yeah thats a problem:)
198cvx 1 year ago
Comment removed
pintofshite 1 year ago
@198cvx Good point, i had DR first and loved it in fact you could not get me off of it, I even created 3 of my own multiplayer maps.
But to me I prefer person v person and no ai,and having to wait in the multiplayer lobby for somebody to lauch an infiltration was a PITA. Also another thing on DR (unless it is my eyes) it is quite easy to TK as the PLA and USMC uniforms are quite similar.
Arma2 to me is not as much a sequal, it is more of a Arma1 port onto better terrain and object detail.
pintofshite 1 year ago
IN TERMS OF CONTENT
ArmA 2 Wins Hands Down,
this is no big guesser,however
IN TERMS OF POLISH BOTH GAMEPLAY AN GRAPHICS
ArmA 2 Lacks Optimization,There Are Like A Hundred Different Buttons For Something That Could Be Done With 2 Buttons,And The Graphic Engine Is One Of The Most Under optimized Engines Ever,As A Result Most People Won't Really Be Able To Play It Anyway,,,And This Is Where OFDR Capitalizes,So OFPR Wins In This Department...
So All Of It Really Comes Down To Choice!!
Anitrex4Anitrex 1 year ago
IN TERMS OF CONTENT
ArmA 2 Wins Hands Down,
this is no big guesser,however
IN TERMS OF POLISH BOTH GAMEPLAY AN GRAPHICS
ArmA 2 Lacks Optimization,There Are Like A Hundred Different Buttons For Something That Could Be Done With 2 Buttons,And The Graphic Engine Although Better Looking Than OFDR Is Terribly Optimized,As A Result Most People Won't Really Be Able To Play It Anyway,,,And This Is Where OFDR Capitalizes,So OFPR Wins In This Department...
So All Of It Really Comes Down To Choice!!
Anitrex4Anitrex 1 year ago
i want arma2 but my computer hasnt got enough memory so i asked my m8 hu has it hes said its like operation flashpoint n its awesome but not as good so i wish in the future i can get a bigger memory pc
kewee49 1 year ago
armed assault => heir of his majesty OpFlashpoint
dragon rising => weird mix, but still cool of OpFls and call of duty
still, both awesome
lestat23989 1 year ago
What song is that?
Ventasmentos 1 year ago
imagine if Bohemia Interactive and Codemaster would work together again
Affeneier9000 1 year ago
different games, operation flashpoint 1 was a bohemia game, it wasnt the usual game everybody played, thats why some of us loved it and got used to it, expected it as well...then dragon rising was a complete mess in my eyes, as ofp1 with the y2k3 mod is still a very resourceful game, even today, dragon rising failed to reach that by a longshot.
Arma 2 retains some of the way how operation flashpoint was and i think maxing it full up it looks way harder than DR.
Deltar2r 1 year ago
What a mad asshole did choose this crazy music for a vid?
Winghelm 1 year ago
(PART 3)
incomparable content, people have to have an extended appreciation for combat. That indeed is not everyone. In all, the game was a success, even if it was not a hit amongst consumers. A 9.0 for its lone existence and methodical gameplay.
Read parts 1 2 and this final part to get a good insight on OPFlash: DR.
GunZeeLad 1 year ago
(PART 2) This game is more of a simulator that can be entertaining only if you have developed a taste for this style of gameplay. It is slow but rewarding. It is tactical but engaging. It is difficult at times but surprising. Operation Flashpoint has all the attributes of a good FPS.
I loved it instantly, especially because I know that this game is the last of its kind. I get the impression that the only way to comprehend DRAGON RISING and its
GunZeeLad 1 year ago
(PART 1)
A Player review on gamespot his rate on the games was 9.0 (Superb)
I will make it simple and short. Expecting everyone to appreciate an art piece in the same manner is close to impossible. This game delivers in almost all aspects in single player. However it does fall a bit short on the multiplayer end of it. With that said, I agree that games should be made to be entertaining and fun
GunZeeLad 1 year ago
both games kill mw2
198cvx 1 year ago
I love both of the games but ARMA 2 just needs to fix the voices.
p00417 1 year ago
so arma 2 is really worth getting? and will an xbox 360 controller work to play with it?
tuna2223 1 year ago
@tuna2223 dont get arma 2 its fucking fun at first but then gets boring plus its complicated and hard to control your character
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx how can it get boring? theres map editor, so shudnt it never get boring? and with an xbox 360 controller shudnt the controls be less hard?
tuna2223 1 year ago
@tuna2223 wat about pc gamers and also ofdr has map editor as well
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx Im gonna be gettin the 360 version of ofpdr so i wont hav map editor and arma 2 wont even work on my computer anyways
tuna2223 1 year ago
@tuna2223 u just made my day with that descision
god bless u
damn im crying
please like the game man
i have dreams yu know?
please dont crush them man!
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx ok ill try not to!!! ;)
tuna2223 1 year ago
@198cvx I just got the game a couple of hours ago and it is BEAST!!! I cant believe that there r people ho do not like this game, even wen i suck at it im still having fun so god bless ofdr fans and god bless codemasters for making a beautiful game and hopefully another beautiful game with the next installment of operation flashpoint (opf red river)
tuna2223 1 year ago 2
@tuna2223 are u jesus? cause wat im hearing from u is celestial
it brings tears to my eyes to hear a man who loves this game as much as i do
god bless man god bless
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx wats ur gamertag, ill play with u!!!
tuna2223 1 year ago
@tuna2223 gamer tag for wat?
198cvx 1 year ago
@tuna2223 i dont have a console and i dont have flashpoint srry
i just played it at friends house alot and im a expert on games believe me
srry i let u down man its my fault
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx thats ok do u know ur friends gamertag for xbox live?
tuna2223 1 year ago
@tuna2223 no srry
198cvx 1 year ago
@tuna2223 since there are less buttons on the xbox 360 than on a computer that means u have less features in terms of character control so yea
plus the map editor is so hard to use i have the game and after 3 months i still cant figure it out
198cvx 1 year ago
dragon rising sucked so fucking hard i mean no map editor 4 xbox or ps3 what the fuck
i had to buy a original xbox and buy ofp elite like wtf are they thinking
ownerloll 1 year ago
Comment removed
198cvx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ownerloll we pc gamers have it tough man i mean no halo 3 for pc?!?!
mw2 pc version sucks ?!?!?
HALO FUCKING REACH ONLY ON FUCKING XBOX 360!?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!!!!!!!!!
ITS ABOUT SOMETIME SOME SHOWED THE XBOX GAMERS THAT PC GAMERS EXIST!!!!!
and not to mention dead space and fallout 3 pc versions have fucking securom
198cvx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ownerloll we pc gamers have it tough man i mean no halo 3 for pc?!?!
mw2 pc version sucks ?!?!?
HALO FUCKING REACH ONLY ON FUCKING XBOX 360!?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!!!!!!!!!
ITS ABOUT SOMETIME SOME SHOWED THE XBOX GAMERS THAT PC GAMERS EXIST!!!!!
and not to mention dead space and fallout 3 pc versions have fucking securom
198cvx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ownerloll we pc gamers have it tough man i mean no halo 3 for pc?!?!
mw2 pc version sucks ?!?!?
HALO FUCKING REACH ONLY ON FUCKING XBOX 360!?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!!!!!!!!!
ITS ABOUT SOMETIME SOME SHOWED THE XBOX GAMERS THAT PC GAMERS EXIST!!!!!
and not to mention dead space and fallout 3 pc versions have fucking securom
198cvx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ownerloll we pc gamers have it tough man i mean no halo 3 for pc?!?!
mw2 pc version sucks ?!?!?
HALO FUCKING REACH ONLY ON FUCKING XBOX 360!?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!!!!!!!!!
ITS ABOUT SOMETIME SOME SHOWED THE XBOX GAMERS THAT PC GAMERS EXIST!!!!!
and not to mention dead space and fallout 3 pc versions have fucking securom
now u think u have it tough?!?!
198cvx 1 year ago
@ownerloll dude u think u have it tough i mean like theres no halo reach pc version
and dead space and fallout 3 pc versions have fucking securom
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx lol "ty"
ownerloll 1 year ago
@ownerloll ........
198cvx 1 year ago
ofp1 > ofp2
Tempeltowner48 1 year ago 15
@Tempeltowner48 lick balls u asshole
your just saying that cause ofp1 is exactaly like arma 2 fanboy
198cvx 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tempeltowner48 1 year ago
flashpoints grafics are much better and the controls are much simpler plus its much less complicated to order your squad around but arma 2 has better editors...
but operation flashpoint is better because it is more intense wheras in arma 2 u just run around and gun people running past u and when your injured it takes a damn long time for your comrades to heal u
also in flashpoint u can see bullets fly and its less random than arma 2
the helicopters are easier to pilot too
ofdr ftw
198cvx 1 year ago
@198cvx ArmA2's engines are literally years ahead of DR. And do you honestly think you're going to be able to see a small piece of metal flying through the air at many times the speed of sound? That's why tracers had to be invented and you can see those in ArmA2 and in real life. If you've come to DR and ArmA from the arcade games like CoD and BFBC I can see why you would think DR is better, because those games are designed for graphics whores and kids, and tbh, they even do a bad job of that.
AODMASTER 1 year ago
@AODMASTER haha u think bfbc2's grafics are for kids u must be out of your mind
198cvx 1 year ago
Comment removed
AODMASTER 1 year ago
@198cvx I worded that wrong, sorry I was talking about CoD when I said that. And there are games that have much better graphics than bfbc2, but bfbc2's graphics are quite good. Sorry for the confusion. On the note of realism, DR is pseudo-realism. Its not actually realistic. Aiming above a target to compensate for bullet drop is hollywood bullshit, that's the whole point in the dials on the scope. Unfortunately in ArmA2, you can't zero the scope, but its really the only unrealistic thing in it.
AODMASTER 1 year ago
its that you would get mw2 over flashpoint.then you would get the least realist so flashpoint.
TheBhje 1 year ago
Just downloaded Operation flashpoint2 For Fucking 4.50$ on steam. Fuck ya. Can't even get a handjob for that much.
CoolConejo 1 year ago 2
Unfortunately, Game play matters more then graphics ever will....
swat122 1 year ago
ARMA 2 its most realistic
TheLordofthewii 1 year ago 2
@TheLordofthewii Actually the sound in Operation Flashpoint is way more realistic, which is a big portion of the game.
kangaroo303 1 year ago
@kerranghighvoltage On some missions yes you have a time limit, for example, the second mission you have to destroy two anti ship missils before there launched and and entire fleet is destroyed..
GridGOD7778 1 year ago
opdr pissed me off so much, partly because i was shit but to be honest arma 2 is the better game
Euan281 1 year ago
iv got dr and its alright but arma 2 ftw, sept thing is its more pc heavy then crysis
sgtsn1per 1 year ago
i like OFDR better thanx to its believable storyline.
BlackEcho24 1 year ago
ArmA 2 ftw! Codies just wanted riding on the name of great game (from the creators of ArmA 2) sooo... ArmA 2 <3
Mavi222 1 year ago
I dont like the Arma 2 . There are too many technical mistake.
Tedbunndy07 1 year ago