This was Cubestormer about 3 years ago,,before I added the fourth upper grip, it was the fastest scanning cube solver at the time, I moved on to create Cubestormer II with my good friend David Gilday and set the world record on 11th November 2011, which was 5.27 seconds :)
@gooddogsit Thats not strictly true...my NeXT robot "CubeStormer2" hasn't solved a single cube yet...maybe if you manage one solve first....?!?!?(you have about six to eight months)
how do u program it i am confused on how u do that i tried and i just cant program it i am using a web cam but when i play it it just scrambles it up differently
@GameMaker8Tutorial The First version I did took almost 4 minutes. to complete a cube, with a lot of work I managed to improve the speed dramatically, what you see here is actually the lower section of CubeStormer before I added the upper gripper almost doubling its size. Cubestormer has become faster than the current video so look out for an update soon... have you posted a video of your machine? I would love to see it :)
In practice any cube can be solved in 20 moves or less.....
software configured to download solution as soon as 20 move solve found......
i know i can execute 20 moves in under 15 seconds, so i dont want the software to waste any more time trying to find a perfect (minimum move) solution...
I havent had a cube yet that the software cant solve in a couple of seconds with more than 20 moves!
@RoboticSolutions and @pZuggler - you may be interested to know that it was recently proved by a few mathemeticians and engineers (including Herbert Kociemba, author of Cube Explorer) that all positions can indeed be solved in 20 or fewer moves - see cube20 dot org for more detail if you're interested :-)
26 is all that's been proven. It's an upper limit, not a lower limit. If you download optimal cube solvers and try random positions, you'll see that 20 is the most ever required. If there are positions that require more than 20, they are very few. None have been found so far.
Wells since there are over 43 quintillion possible permutations to the cube I don't think it is valid to say that you tried a bunch of random positions and found that 20 moves was the most required. What are the odds that you tried the `position` that requires the most, or even the odds that you tried one of the `posistions`that require above average. even if you tried a third of all possible that still wouldn`t be a good indication as you would have about a 67 percent chance to havenot tried...
the one that requires the most. Since a third of all of them would be about 14 quintillion there`s no way you would ever come close to trying that many. Infact odds are that no cube will ever be in the position that requires the most moves. So there is no way you can claim that 20 is the highest because all of the ones anyone has tried have never been more, when all th ones anyone has tried would only be a small fraction of all the possible ones.
You misunderstood me. Millions, perhaps billions, of random combinations have been tried with such programs, and no one has found one requiring more than 20. Thus, the chances that a position taking more than 20 is less than 1 in a million, perhaps 1 in a billion. Every time someone used a computer to solve the optimal solution, it has produced one in 20 moves or less -- to date. It's not a proof. It's just an indicate of chances.
Actually you misunderstood me. Let's say that and enormous 50 billion random permutations have been tried (yeah right). That is only about one billionth of the possible permutations. You can't claim that because one one billionth are one way that the other 999 999 999 billionths are the same. You see the thing here is that even trying 50 billion permutations you are only trying a billionth of the total amount, and just because a billionth of them don't go over 20 moves doesn't even come close...
Okay well I was actually at the university of waterloo in the summer of 2007 when two guys proved 26 was the most moves required, I have the news paper article too. Looks like you are wrong.
@hubertandclyde - I think you may have mis-understood the original 26 move proof. This was a proof of the "upper bound" of the value not a proof that a position exists that actually needs 26. In issue 2668 of the New Scientist magazine in August 2008 it was reported that new "upper bound" of 23 was proved. I also believe that this has now been reduced to 22. It has also been proven that there are some postions that need at least 20 moves so the maximum is somewhere between 20 and 22 inclusive.
What is the average number of moves to solve a cube calculated by the software that you are using? Not that long ago it was proven that any cube can be solved within 26 moves, and most configurations in 23 moves I think.
LOL, would it burn itself out? Malfunction....error...error! (actually the software would pick up on an invalid cube config before it came to that..!)
The 15 seconds I'm aiming for is for the physical solving of the cube,from starting the first face rotation to releasing the completed cube. The software I am using gives me a solution in a fraction of a second after a 5.5 second scan with the web cam. to get the solution into the robot I first have to convert the solution ie U D2 F' R L to a series of numbers that the robot can use. This is still a work in progress but the whole operation should take less than 10 seconds.
Scrambled cube scanned into pc, running cubesolver, solution downloaded to robot as a series of moves(maximum 20),robot executes moves and re-orientates the cube as fast as it can.
woooowwwww !!!!
vinamarora8 1 month ago
This was Cubestormer about 3 years ago,,before I added the fourth upper grip, it was the fastest scanning cube solver at the time, I moved on to create Cubestormer II with my good friend David Gilday and set the world record on 11th November 2011, which was 5.27 seconds :)
RoboticSolutions 1 month ago
sorry the world record is 5.35 seconds including the scan
ArmyGuy7630 1 month ago
@ArmyGuy7630 you should check who designed this robot! ;-)
IAssemble 1 month ago
Oh, you made the CubeStormer. My bad.
bpmagruder 4 months ago
Sorry, the world record is 10 seconds.
bpmagruder 4 months ago
cool robot..
watch?v=6cKfjqwiqt0&feature=watch_response
ridzBORED 4 months ago
that was awesome
ukstevey 8 months ago
isnt this the ONLY rubik's-cube-solving-lego-robot?
waawamellon 9 months ago
did u made that lego
MrBunnett 10 months ago
@MrBunnett Did I build the machine? Yes. (This is an early version which developed into "CubeStormer" the 12 second cube solver.)
RoboticSolutions 10 months ago
i am jealous because all robots can solve the cube faster than me
gooddogsit 1 year ago
@gooddogsit Thats not strictly true...my NeXT robot "CubeStormer2" hasn't solved a single cube yet...maybe if you manage one solve first....?!?!?(you have about six to eight months)
RoboticSolutions 1 year ago
@RoboticSolutions how do you make them solve the cube?
gooddogsit 1 year ago
@RoboticSolutions how do you make them solve the cube? i would not know where to start making the robot solve the cube
gooddogsit 1 year ago
@gooddogsit .It's all done with clever software, "CubeExplorer", written by Herbert Kociemba, was used for this and quite a few other machines.
RoboticSolutions 1 year ago
how do u program it i am confused on how u do that i tried and i just cant program it i am using a web cam but when i play it it just scrambles it up differently
chelben9 1 year ago
nice work! I have also created one, but it's very slow. The CubeStormer is the fastest, but i'm sure you can build one thats faster than it.
GameMaker8Tutorial 1 year ago
@GameMaker8Tutorial The First version I did took almost 4 minutes. to complete a cube, with a lot of work I managed to improve the speed dramatically, what you see here is actually the lower section of CubeStormer before I added the upper gripper almost doubling its size. Cubestormer has become faster than the current video so look out for an update soon... have you posted a video of your machine? I would love to see it :)
RoboticSolutions 1 year ago
@Ymate5 nope...5.6, new record xD
Whamesl0l 1 year ago
....lego, thats solves rubiks cubes?.....now ive seen it all
Whamesl0l 1 year ago
LEGO?!!?!?
meng780 1 year ago
nerd! :)
ravinago 1 year ago
CubeStormer does it in 10 seconds...
sajado71 1 year ago
@Ymate5 wow^^but at the vid the camera doesnt help^^
Spezialedbiker 1 year ago
what....
BloodXSweatXGuitars 1 year ago
It could be programmed to solve a specific jumbled layout. Have a random person on the street mix it up THEN try it.
ToshiroKomoto 2 years ago
@ToshiroKomoto agreed. this is (as the troll would put it) fake and gay :D
nikkadawgg 2 years ago
Wow!!
antoniot157 2 years ago
talk about home video
d1995a3 2 years ago
Holy SHizNad
VinceD41 2 years ago
Can you make a tutorial on how to make one!
donttuchmybass 2 years ago
Wow!
:))
chickitojuanito 2 years ago
the world record from peoples were 24 sec
Spezialedbiker 2 years ago
@Spezialedbiker actually, the world record is 7.08 sec
Marco9603 1 year ago
@Marco9603 5.6 secs actually
Whamesl0l 1 year ago
All this computer talk is hurting my head.
SwineBrothers 2 years ago
i now!
5684620 2 years ago
CuBear solves the cube in 6 seconds on average, so no this isnt the fastest.
ben1996123 2 years ago
True,but it isnt made of lego...is it ?
RoboticSolutions 2 years ago
Ah ok, but since you just put the word lego in brackets, I didnt know that, so yeah this probably is the fastest.
ben1996123 2 years ago
No worries , btw my new 4 eight fingered version is gonna be nearly twice as fast so WATCH THIS SPACE :)
RoboticSolutions 2 years ago
30-40 seconds is how fast my buddy's robot RuBot II is.
tornadonoob1 2 years ago
thats badass
CCxDemi923 2 years ago
To me it looks as if the robot just reveresed the mixing order someone put it up as.
himpllx 2 years ago
that is scary
Joey35826 2 years ago
In practice any cube can be solved in 20 moves or less.....
software configured to download solution as soon as 20 move solve found......
i know i can execute 20 moves in under 15 seconds, so i dont want the software to waste any more time trying to find a perfect (minimum move) solution...
I havent had a cube yet that the software cant solve in a couple of seconds with more than 20 moves!
(hope this answers your question)
RoboticSolutions 2 years ago
I don't think 20 moves is right. Last time I checked 26 moves was god's algorithm
pZuggler 2 years ago
Haven't had a combination that needs more than 20 moves yet (and ive done quite a few)!!!!
RoboticSolutions 2 years ago
@RoboticSolutions and @pZuggler - you may be interested to know that it was recently proved by a few mathemeticians and engineers (including Herbert Kociemba, author of Cube Explorer) that all positions can indeed be solved in 20 or fewer moves - see cube20 dot org for more detail if you're interested :-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
26 is all that's been proven. It's an upper limit, not a lower limit. If you download optimal cube solvers and try random positions, you'll see that 20 is the most ever required. If there are positions that require more than 20, they are very few. None have been found so far.
JDoucette 2 years ago
Wells since there are over 43 quintillion possible permutations to the cube I don't think it is valid to say that you tried a bunch of random positions and found that 20 moves was the most required. What are the odds that you tried the `position` that requires the most, or even the odds that you tried one of the `posistions`that require above average. even if you tried a third of all possible that still wouldn`t be a good indication as you would have about a 67 percent chance to havenot tried...
pZuggler 2 years ago
the one that requires the most. Since a third of all of them would be about 14 quintillion there`s no way you would ever come close to trying that many. Infact odds are that no cube will ever be in the position that requires the most moves. So there is no way you can claim that 20 is the highest because all of the ones anyone has tried have never been more, when all th ones anyone has tried would only be a small fraction of all the possible ones.
pZuggler 2 years ago
You misunderstood me. Millions, perhaps billions, of random combinations have been tried with such programs, and no one has found one requiring more than 20. Thus, the chances that a position taking more than 20 is less than 1 in a million, perhaps 1 in a billion. Every time someone used a computer to solve the optimal solution, it has produced one in 20 moves or less -- to date. It's not a proof. It's just an indicate of chances.
JDoucette 2 years ago
Actually you misunderstood me. Let's say that and enormous 50 billion random permutations have been tried (yeah right). That is only about one billionth of the possible permutations. You can't claim that because one one billionth are one way that the other 999 999 999 billionths are the same. You see the thing here is that even trying 50 billion permutations you are only trying a billionth of the total amount, and just because a billionth of them don't go over 20 moves doesn't even come close...
pZuggler 2 years ago
To indicating anything about the other 999 999 999 billionths. You are comparing 1 to 999 999 999.
pZuggler 2 years ago
Mathematics has prooven that it always requires 21 moves or less.
DaNovaMagic 2 years ago
Nice, I didn't hear about this, when was it proven? Must have been recent.
hubertandclyde 2 years ago
Actually it was in the 80's. Most people here are just too fucking stupid to research.
DaNovaMagic 2 years ago
Okay well I was actually at the university of waterloo in the summer of 2007 when two guys proved 26 was the most moves required, I have the news paper article too. Looks like you are wrong.
hubertandclyde 2 years ago 3
@hubertandclyde - I think you may have mis-understood the original 26 move proof. This was a proof of the "upper bound" of the value not a proof that a position exists that actually needs 26. In issue 2668 of the New Scientist magazine in August 2008 it was reported that new "upper bound" of 23 was proved. I also believe that this has now been reduced to 22. It has also been proven that there are some postions that need at least 20 moves so the maximum is somewhere between 20 and 22 inclusive.
IAssemble 1 year ago 6
Oh look, in 2008 it was proved to be 25, there's no way they proved 21 back in the 80's...
hubertandclyde 2 years ago 2
@pZuggler its more close to 23 actually.
concretecubes 1 year ago
What is the average number of moves to solve a cube calculated by the software that you are using? Not that long ago it was proven that any cube can be solved within 26 moves, and most configurations in 23 moves I think.
PaschenBack 2 years ago
Is it faster than RUBOT II?
kensim28 3 years ago
yeah,its at least twice as fast as the famous Cubinator!
RoboticSolutions 3 years ago
Have you ever tried taking out a piece and putting it in turned, then giving it to the robot. what do you think would happen?
AreSkavlid 3 years ago
LOL, would it burn itself out? Malfunction....error...error! (actually the software would pick up on an invalid cube config before it came to that..!)
RoboticSolutions 3 years ago
wow...tes les meh dia gratz on the rubiks dubiu solveria
bpaintball1 3 years ago
sweet!
ViccieB1993 3 years ago
The 15 seconds I'm aiming for is for the physical solving of the cube,from starting the first face rotation to releasing the completed cube. The software I am using gives me a solution in a fraction of a second after a 5.5 second scan with the web cam. to get the solution into the robot I first have to convert the solution ie U D2 F' R L to a series of numbers that the robot can use. This is still a work in progress but the whole operation should take less than 10 seconds.
RoboticSolutions 3 years ago
so it justs does the same algorythem over and over again
FrappicinoINC 3 years ago
Wow thats great!!! how long to the cube face scans take?
xmlisnotaprotocol 3 years ago
total scan time is 5.5 seconds
RoboticSolutions 3 years ago
can it do the whole entire solve planning in under 15 seconds? Including generating the solve?
cubeCAT13 3 years ago
did u pre solve it or did the robot accualy solve it
FrappicinoINC 3 years ago
Scrambled cube scanned into pc, running cubesolver, solution downloaded to robot as a series of moves(maximum 20),robot executes moves and re-orientates the cube as fast as it can.
RoboticSolutions 3 years ago
uh.......thank u
FrappicinoINC 3 years ago