Titanic did not simply tilt, she moved forward and down because the weight of the water was pulling the bow down. The tilt was not extreme until the majority of the ship was in the water, and the propellers were not above the water until after the first funnel and grand staircase were completely submerged, and when the water level was up to the base of the 2nd funnel.
The bow wasn't desgined to hold the sterns weight, hence the reason why the Titanic split, another reason it could of split is because the stern was actually an extension built onto the ship, the people that built the Titanic were told that the designer wanted it to be a bigger ship than the design said. So, what the crew members done is: was leave the gurders in and extend on them, if it wasn't an extension, the ship wouldn't have split, but due to the gurders not going up to where it split.
Erh ... You only have to look at the first animation sequence to see why the theory was always disputed from the start. As the bow is being pulled up towards the end, it would have been pulled over (watch any of the countless WWII by-the-head sinking videos to see an example).
Also, most of the witness testimonies affirm that the ship listed during the sinking.
The only way for it to have sunk without listing would have been keel not hull damage.
if it didnt break in half.....then why is the bow the only thing thats left of it?....i mean like it wouldnt have collapsed under the water b/c the stern would be right behind it did you think of that?
no one knows how did the titanic sank it was just a movie that woman who stayeed alive that told the story about them its movie nobody knows how the titanic sank and the titanic was a litlle different think guys this is only remake
why did most survivors of the titanic say it split then? Why would they lie? I'm not trying to offend you or anything ... just sayin'. Good theory though ... Kudos!
it doesn't matter if she sunk in 1 piece or many bits, the fact is she's at the bottom of the Atlantic, the fact is Captain lunatic went full speed into an iceberg field
One theory I have heard is that maybe when it was sinking the titanic reaches a angle of about 14 degrees it starts to crack and bend but the crack stop at double bottom double bottom fails the titanic stern brakes the other way compressing upper decks. Or how the titanic bow at the crack is bent and slanted is when it hit the seafloor it was pressed down by pressure
alexfadd, nice theory but what you heard was wrong. If it broke when it hit the ground how could the stern travel 1,970 feet apart. I hope this awnswers your question
There's is no problem in presenting new theories, but you have first to understand all the marine engineering concepts before starting make your own ;).
Or if you just put the ship supported by a single point in the middle of it and it will bent both ship extremities until total colapse of middle section.
The middle section is always the critical point of stress forces and bending moments of the ship. And its allways designed as the more streghted point to resist hogging and sagging movements cause by the waves.
My God. Never saw such a bunch of bullshit condensed in just 2:40 minutes of pure improvising specullation. Jesus.
ARE YOU A MARINE ENGINEER OR NAVAL ARCHITECT??? ARE YOU ENGINEER AT ALL.
Cause I am. ;) The ship structure is not design in order to support it's own weight without collapsing. You put a ship with 250 m of leght supported only in both extremities and the middle section stress will collapse the ship and broke him in two.
@Moscovo if you say your a ship engineer or whatevs you wwould know that a ship is a she or her ,only a warship would b refered to as a he but evn the bismark was called a she (not including the captain who refered to her as a he)
Excuse me sir. Your best theory to attack my facts is to say that I'm not an engineer by saying that I refered the gender of a ship or boat? I do know that in general (not always!) a ship is called by "her". It's very old the origin of that. But have you ever consider that I'm not even English. Or that english is not my native language? Have you considered that in may country it's used both genders to refer the ship?
Have you consider that embarked people are more connected to the roots of the "her" and "she" use? Have you considered that it is more often used the"she" in the military then in the civilian branch? Have you even thought that I could have by mistake put "him" instead of "her"? I don't know.
Why do you even bother to make a comment like that. Are you adding anything important or interesting to the debate. Are you have arguing against my theory?
i acctually belive the two-piece theory because that's what wikipedia said. oh wait people make up that stuff but i still think its 2-piece due to the structure failing.
Didn't the survivors of the Titanic say that it split. I would believe them more then scientists. After all scientists are the ones that came up with the pointless and untrue evolution theory.
Explorers and scientist have proven that the break in the hull was clean broken all the way down to the double plated bottom. Then as pressure increase as more water took on, the stress broke the bottom. It is believed that the ship separated beneath the water but the damage was done on the surface. the top of the ship was stronger than the bottom, Most of the damage was at the top of the ship. Currents capsized the ship as it sank.
The Titanic definitely split in 2 above the surface: it had an expansion joint that was poorly designed and resultantly served as the little chip that started the crack which split it in two when the ship couldn't sustain its own weight.
I'm just giving a blind shot in the dark, but what if the chambers meant to keep the ship from sinking had an effect on how it sank? weight could be distributed to the front, since it was a head on collision, and the boat would sink and the rest would follow. Thus the ship would stay in tact.
There were so many eyewitnesses to the sinking who survived that the matter should be fact not speculation. One problem: The White Star Line crew lied about the ship not breaking in two to try to cover their asses, as if not willing to admit anything bad about the ship, as if it's all the iceberg's fault. Screw them. It's the crew's fault. They had plenty of iceberg warnings. HUMAN ERROR runs rampant. And once the government runs health care, there'll be new meaning to human error! Wait & see.
No, it doesn't. Ask anyone who's used it. The wait is too long; the doctors barely speak English. The cancer survival rates are much lower than in the USA. C'mon! Do the research! Gov't could not even manage FNMA. Medicare is full of fraud, and doctors are refusing more patients with it everyday. Obama-Care will cost everyone more in taxes and deliver a worse product. It's lose/lose. Politicians win by claiming victory and asking for your votes in return, suckers!!!
Don't be a patronizing smug arrogant fool, calling me "son," as if you know better. You haven't done the research I mentioned yet, or you would understand why the Brit's and Canadians come to the USA for their health care. One Canadian was denied care, because he forgot his official card. When he went home to get it, he died of acute appendicitis. He was in his 20's. The bureaucrat said he did nothing wrong, just followed procedure. No one wants petty officials playing king with their life.
When I try to do it on sketchup alls it does is not pick the stern up but it just sinks down without doing anything else. Is there something I'm doing wrong?
The Ship Broke in Half because between the 3rd and 4th funnel is an air shaft above the boilers, with allows air and light through. As the Pressure built that when it was almost vertical, it couldn't take the pressure(because the ship itself was 892/5 feet) and split.
If not for Leonardo Di Caprio and a bunch of horney teenagers, we would have forgotten all about it. The power of Hollywood. I am sorry though about the real tragedy. I can only imagine the valient courage of the condemned and the painful memory of those who felt guilt for their own survival. LIfe is precious, Hollywood is not...thanks Gianni
A very good theory, one i heard is that the ship broke in two above water but did not detach itself until completley submerged, they reckon the keel or the spine of the ship held it together then finally broke when several meters under water, one reason for the sloping decks on the bow aswell is that when breaking it tore the sides away and therefore they collapsed on eachother when it landed on the sea bed, the stern damage they think was caused by huge amounts of air still trapped inside.
The visual evidences at heart of the Atlantic erase the possibility of the collapse in a single piece, the two parts at heart are several hundreds of meters separated. The pressure differential of the sustenation of the part without water with respect to the one of full water prow is of several thousands of tons impossible to resist mechanically, was simply not designed for similar pressure.
I love how these assholes gave this video a one star rating before even letting the video explain itself. Kids, leave ratings to the grownups. PLEASE.
it was impossible for it not to split cos since it was hit on the right side, physics proves that since more water was coming in from the right than from the left list was a certainty so ut theorys shit
They ment it rose at a 30 degree angle not 30 metres, but how the TITANIC sank will be a mystery forever untill some clever person invents a time machine lol!!
Not that big of a mystery really... The answer is quite simple, The Ship designers for whatever reason only made the first four (4) compartments of the ship watertight, the other 12 only went so far so the water could go over the tops. (I guess they figured they would be able to see anything in time to turn..) Either way the Iceburg cut a hole in the first five (5) compartments which allowed the water to continue leaking into the ship with the pumps unable to keep up it was then a matter of time
Yes i know all about the TITANIC i have copies of her original blueprints copies of the passenger and crew list and many books on how she was built how she sank what order the lifeboats went in, i even have a copy of one of the hearings with Ismay, so i know all about the compartments but thanks for sharing your knowledge, it is nice to see someone actually knows something about the ship as i have encountered some bloody idiots who don't know jack shit about the TITANIC who think they do.
You are correct had they done this, then yes the TITANIC would not of sank but merely had a broken nose and then she would of limped to New York, but had this happened then the ship wouldn't of been famous or rather infamous as she actually is.
@CHRISTINKER86 the titanic would not have sunk if it went at the iceberg head on but because it turned it scraped the side of it making a huge hole right down the side filling all of the hulls
@CHRISTINKER86 they already found out how the titanic sank but i think its just 99% true thers always 1 thing missing and thats:we never have seen what happent whith our own eyes what they are saying about how the titanic sank is just from investegations :D + there weren't cameras back then right? or video makers or somthing
interesting theory, but I have to apologize that it's irrelevant. How does steel become heated in 28 degree water? Frail steel from the freezing water temperature would cause the steel to break apart easily, but that doesn't explain why those who survived told their story of how they saw that ship break apart, before it's final plunge. That is why the break before going down theory is probably more likely, because people saw it happen. And the evidence on the ocean floor backs it completely.
i may have spelled some words wrong heres the correct translation reck-wreck part 1/ cup-cut part 1/ help from experiment from part 1/ get a slinky eraser or hamburger bend it down (not up) watch the top get cleanly cut the bottem gets smashed and you might see ripples at the bottem OK if you have questions just mail me on youtube bye
part 2///so the double bottem is the only thing holding titanic together it starts to fail tons of water poor in bending titanic the other way the upper decks get mangled at smashed while the bottem gets almost a perfect cut then titanic pulls the stern verticle the double bottem seperates and titanic plunges to its doom!!!
i dont belive it broke at a 30-45degree angle if that happened the top of the reck would be clean cut and the bottem smashed if you have a slinky eraser or hamburger watch the top get clean cup and the bottem getting smashed so look at the wreck photos from robert ballard look at the breakup point the top is smashed the bottem clean cut so i belive titanic split at 11 or 12degrees this is how it will work the titaning begins spliting in two the double bottem///part 2 is next comment
if you think about it, the Titanic was going 30 knots heading to the bottom (2 vertical miles!!!!) so when it hit the ocean floor, obviously it won't land just regular. we're talking dynamite blowing up. over 600 feet of dynamite(bow section) so obviously the free decks would either fall down (like the end of the bow section or fall of completly. im trying to explain it into a video, but its hard to really show it.
I saw the 1997 movie. And when the ship landed on the bottom of the Atlantic, the stern imploded during the trip down due to that part of the stern had air instead of water. And so much water pressure in the stern was fighting against the air presure, and caused it to implode. The hill filled up completely with water. The 1997 movie is oine of my favorite. It's a well detailed movie showing what goes on inside a ship when it sinks along with several dos and don'ts in ship operation.
actually when the titanic sunk it tilted at a diagonal degree. And then due to gravity, the ship snapped in half (im not sure if it was half exactly), and sunk. Which is why the ship is not in one full part. Its in two. So cmtrains your grandma is correct. (if what you say is true about her being there when the Titanic sunk).
when the Titanic was at a 30 or 45 degree angle, the keel wasnt strong to support the weight of water, which can cause to ship to break up, there is no possible way for a ship to be at a 90 degree angle intact, if u take a look at the titanic movie, a night to remember, it sank at 45 degrees, without breaking up, the 1997 film featured the ship breaking up that started in the boat deck and down to the keel, which caused the stern to falls backwards, it is my expert opinion right now
Hi. I really liked the video. I think the same as you. The ship sank and broke under water because of the water pressure pushing towards it as it goes down, they go towards each other until Titanic cant ake ann more and the bottom splits then water pushes its way through the cracks and breaks it in half. As the two peices g down they get further away from each other and then the bottom hull breaks away from the stern of the ship. Wilksey10.
it could be possible, he did say that it broke apart underwater because of the weakening of the metal because of the stress, pressure, and the stress.
so what if its not real. its just a theroy. ohh stop complaining, if you dont like then dont watch it. you must like it though to talk about it. So overall, the video isnt the fake, you are!!!
this was a waist of time...there the theory of whole boat sinking. people who survived the titanic state that it did split and it did sink as told in all the history videos and movies, so no its not true....
good for you, youre a trisome, I'm thinking number 21. think about the weight. Could you even imagine?? THink for A sec. Nevertheless, regardless of your incompetence, it doesn't really matter. . . look at the movie, if it's EVEN a reasonable designation of what may have taken place. . . what a motherfucker. . .RIGHT?? Who cares who EXACTLY it happened, it happened, and it must've been terrifying.
one very hard part of you theory to explain would be "if the the ship broke upside down then how did it manage to land right side up?" also one could theorize that the g-force produced by the sudden stop at the ocean floor could explain the bent down deck.
I agree. I've always felt that the collapsed decks on the aft part of the bow section were caused by the impact on the ocean floor. Plus, all the witness accounts that describe a leveling of the stern before Titanic sank suggests the ship broke at the surface.
I think it is a very good theory.. Because, after titanic sank, and every1 was in new york (I mean the survivors) man started to find out, why it sank.. So, they asked many, and Mr. Lightholler told that it went down in one peace.. But we dont know...
Its a stupid theory. Consider the weight of the ship. Theres so way the ass end of the ship went all the way up 90 degrees, and sunk right down, It just doesnt work that way. Consider eye witness accounts, close examination of the wreckage, and common sense, A ship that size doesnt, and cant lift up out of the water 90 degrees, and sink without breaking in two.
I know what its called. But the fact remains, a ship that size simply cannot sink that way. Not how it was designed. Enough damage was done to the stern on the ship from the air trapped inside becoming compressed and blowing out. Thats why you hardly ever see pictures of it, Theres not that much to see. If the entire ship stayed togather, most of the ship would have been destroyed by escaping air; Dont fuck with air pressure lol
i have herd a theory that the titanic sunk in one pice stright down but the reason the found it broken was becase it hisd the ground like it had sunk and snaped in halfe can anyone confirm???????????
There are several theories; some say it sank on the surface, some say underwater. Right now, evidence points towards a surface split. This is a video that would demonstrate an underwater split, how the Titanic sank in one piece.
The Titanic sank in two pieces, as confirmed by the discovery of the wreck. The stern was badly wrecked because there was some air trapped inside. As she plummented to the bottom, the air was forced out which caused the decks to be blown apart. My personal belief is the 30 degree angle theory.
My personal belief is the 11-degree angle, opposite splitting theory... although I do believe the Titanic broke at the surface, from my own opinion and by testimony taken by survivors (it could go either way, but this is what I believe).
Also, Titanic DID sink with a list; water was rushing in from the starboard side (in 1912 hard-a-starboard was a turn to port; and the iceberg was on the starboard side, or right), and causing an imbalance in the weight distribution of the ship ;)
Titanic should have sank with a list, but it probably didnt because the bulkheads had no lids on them, the water just ran in freely and was able to fill the ship up like a glass of water. As the water entered, it pretty much had no obstruction to its flow. And was even more easily distributed as the ships structure started to fail. Windows breaking,, The splitting of the hull, possibly in more places then one.
The 11-12 degree angle does make more sense then a 30. Given the evidence
well no one knows 100% but things like these leave very clear signs about what happened, Things like metal fituge and obvious damage. a ship as large sinking in one peice would have much more air trapped inside and would have exploded vioently underwater, It cant break as cleanly underwater as it did on the surface, thats just common sense.
But I think different. I think the ship split at a higher angle of 15 degrees , then the split started. It stopped at the double bottom and the force was enough to have the stern fall back to the water. The small section of the exposed bow at the split also falls backdown. This pushes the split middle below the water line and then raises the stern to 45 degrees. Meanwhile the double bottom has been twisted down and now up. It then fails, and breaks.
The newest theory is that The Titanic split at an angle of 11 degrees. The split stopped at the double bottom hull. Then water filled where the split was and pulled the middle down. The Titanic Split the other way.
i dont believe it and the reason the stern is so mangled is because after the titanic sank the water was still moving down with it downblast the water moved at the rate it sank like 70 mph so it basically tore the stern up good theory but highly unlikely
the vid would hve been good.if you knew how titanic realy sank oh i think it would be some waht hards for it to break in water bow first how would the stern have time to fall apart like it did i seen a picture of the stern and it was i meesed up.i miad a good truthful point.say somting about that gravity my but watch survivers say how it sank and dont say that the old pepole would not have remembered for them im sure they probaly would not forget IT WAS A NIGHT TO REMEMBER .
no i was wacthing survivers say how it sank one siad "i didnt close my eyes i wacthed that ship break in half"you would not know you was not there.please dont even say im rong i seen survivers say on my titanic document
nope. Just a theory. Many say it sunk in two pieces. I actually drift closer to the theory where it split at the surface, and sunk in two-pieces. This is the theory that it sank above the surface in one piece and split at some point beneath the surface.
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
Titanic's sten has 2 theories. 1, the most commonly know is that when the pressure from all the trapped air in the stern following forced it's way out of the ship on the way down the pressure caused it to explode out causing the mangled mess the other that many don't know is based on the stange way the propeller's bent. They believe that stern slammed into the floor at the every end and the hard slam caused the steel to mangle. Both of their theories could b right but urs doesn't make since
This theory is ridiculous there is no proof and the fact that most items in titanic remain in their position from before the sinking disprove this theory if this was the case dishes (which remain in their spots) furniture etc would be tossed around and there would have been more damage how do u explain it being right side up not to mention in every test titanic sinks in a falling leaf patter with a back and forth motion and even when tested in once pice it never flips.
The sheer mass of the Titanic, and the force of gravity definately would have split it as it were still submerging. There are also testimonials from survivors that state it did break above water. One of the radiomen that send the SOS signal was in a lifeboat just under the rudder, and reported that it fell down nearly ontop of their craft.
sorry im not trying to either. i understand the way it went down. its hard to explain. its like evolution. You know thats most likely what happened, but there are other ways it could have happened. to be honest no one will know exactly what happened, its something that happened in the middle of the ocean 90 something years ago. but yeah its hard to tell someones tone when your typing, so my apologies as well.
idk there are a lot of holes in this theory. For it to work i believe that there would have to be an implosion of some sort, not a clean break underwater. If an implosion is the case the bow would be in far worse condition than it is now. But its alway nice to have an alternate theory, right?
ok did you watch the video? its a theory that the ship sank in one piece. i am dismissing the theory because i feel it is impossible without an underwater implosion. the stern didnt stick way out of the water like you think. there was damage on the bottom of the ship, which caused the superstructure to crack and break from the bottom up. it wasnt because it was too heavy. it didnt reach a high angle. its back was already broken before it could have ever lifted out of the water.
He doesn't think it, if I'm reading it correctly, he is just presenting what it'd look like if it were true until he can make the breakup version possible.
ok if it split under the water then it would of split the second it went under because it would make a difference 10 minutes later. also it makes no sence it broke in two under the water because it would split that means its strong enough to hold all the water without breaking in half and it would just go down.
kittenamos please rewrite what you said so it makes more sence please and thank you.... i can only get the idea of what your saying but not the whole thing.
I think that this is just about exactly what happened, the Titanic did not go down in a 90 degree angle, like some people, and the movie say. In fact, it went down at about a 30 degree angle, causing the middle section of the ship to rise, and fall again. the titanic broke in half about a mile underwater, and drifted about 1,970 feet away from each other. the back of the ship hit the ocean floor so hard, causing it to basically explode on the impact.
the ship did break in half above the water but in my opinion the bow pulled the stern down with it and then they went their seperate ways after the ship sank all the way down. think about it, the stern had trapped air locked inside and if nothing pulled it down, it would have floated and not gone under. the ship sank with an 80 degree angle
How do you explain the wreck of Titanic? It's into two pieces!!!
TyrannosaurusRex0504 2 months ago in playlist TiTaNiC
It's already been proven. The Titanic sank then Split in TWO Pieces. They proved this in 86'.
philipfry4073 2 months ago
how to sink a ship in google sketchup
nerko96D 3 months ago
it could be possible that if it did sink in one piece, it could have split from the water pressure as she fell like a stone
julienmauricemort 7 months ago
the titanic split.... duh
MegaJohnCom 7 months ago
titanic splits
JimwellPagdanganan12 8 months ago
its splits
gtamenu 9 months ago
How is the sharp-ended aft expansion joint supposed to have coped with that high angle?
Hirvassalo 9 months ago
Titanic did not simply tilt, she moved forward and down because the weight of the water was pulling the bow down. The tilt was not extreme until the majority of the ship was in the water, and the propellers were not above the water until after the first funnel and grand staircase were completely submerged, and when the water level was up to the base of the 2nd funnel.
lordchocobo222 9 months ago
The bow wasn't desgined to hold the sterns weight, hence the reason why the Titanic split, another reason it could of split is because the stern was actually an extension built onto the ship, the people that built the Titanic were told that the designer wanted it to be a bigger ship than the design said. So, what the crew members done is: was leave the gurders in and extend on them, if it wasn't an extension, the ship wouldn't have split, but due to the gurders not going up to where it split.
EpicJosh12 10 months ago
@EpicJosh12 it split (read the other comment first)
EpicJosh12 10 months ago
Erh ... You only have to look at the first animation sequence to see why the theory was always disputed from the start. As the bow is being pulled up towards the end, it would have been pulled over (watch any of the countless WWII by-the-head sinking videos to see an example).
Also, most of the witness testimonies affirm that the ship listed during the sinking.
The only way for it to have sunk without listing would have been keel not hull damage.
kfsone 1 year ago
it wouldnt break underwater if that were the case....
w00tbeerisgood 1 year ago
if it didnt break in half.....then why is the bow the only thing thats left of it?....i mean like it wouldnt have collapsed under the water b/c the stern would be right behind it did you think of that?
MadisonNicole001 1 year ago
the ship fell forward not backwards
mike456156 1 year ago
no one knows how did the titanic sank it was just a movie that woman who stayeed alive that told the story about them its movie nobody knows how the titanic sank and the titanic was a litlle different think guys this is only remake
zizzleish 1 year ago
maybe the if no double hull she wuldnt have splitZ? idk mayb because it cause extra weight
alexandthomas 1 year ago
the music =i want to no what it is
TomMan03 1 year ago
the boat snaped in half
libbyloulo1999 1 year ago
What about when it hits the bottom?
muttonhead2001 1 year ago
What's with the 1812 Overture? I think it's quite a nice addition to the video.
plusplusplusplusp 1 year ago
dose not look right in any angle and the stern sank at a 90 dere angle because the stern is riped up by an air buble from when it split
quintanafaj2009 1 year ago
my theory is it split underwater but we know it spit because of the wreck
quintanafaj2009 1 year ago
@quintanafaj2009 whys that?
rdj9606 1 year ago
@rdj9606 When you look at the wreck the stern is about 9 miles from the bow and there is a debris field stretching 10 miles.
quintanafaj2009 1 year ago
@quintanafaj2009 9 Miles?? More like a half of a mile...
lawtongreymanning 1 year ago
@lawtongreymanning o sorry but the debris field is 10 miles long, correct?
quintanafaj2009 1 year ago
why did most survivors of the titanic say it split then? Why would they lie? I'm not trying to offend you or anything ... just sayin'. Good theory though ... Kudos!
Vegna24 1 year ago
it prob split on land because titanic is like 100 tons or somthing
11thearbiter 1 year ago
it doesn't matter if she sunk in 1 piece or many bits, the fact is she's at the bottom of the Atlantic, the fact is Captain lunatic went full speed into an iceberg field
mikesway23 1 year ago
@mikesway23 it was captain smith on the titanic.
quintanafaj2009 1 year ago
One theory I have heard is that maybe when it was sinking the titanic reaches a angle of about 14 degrees it starts to crack and bend but the crack stop at double bottom double bottom fails the titanic stern brakes the other way compressing upper decks. Or how the titanic bow at the crack is bent and slanted is when it hit the seafloor it was pressed down by pressure
TheHeavynerf 1 year ago
alexfadd, nice theory but what you heard was wrong. If it broke when it hit the ground how could the stern travel 1,970 feet apart. I hope this awnswers your question
TheHeavynerf 1 year ago
you dummy the titanic had a list and split above water.
EndTheFilms 1 year ago
This movie is BS, gimme back my 2:42 mins
iSewil 1 year ago
There's is no problem in presenting new theories, but you have first to understand all the marine engineering concepts before starting make your own ;).
Best regards to all.
Moscovo 1 year ago
Or if you just put the ship supported by a single point in the middle of it and it will bent both ship extremities until total colapse of middle section.
The middle section is always the critical point of stress forces and bending moments of the ship. And its allways designed as the more streghted point to resist hogging and sagging movements cause by the waves.
Moscovo 1 year ago
My God. Never saw such a bunch of bullshit condensed in just 2:40 minutes of pure improvising specullation. Jesus.
ARE YOU A MARINE ENGINEER OR NAVAL ARCHITECT??? ARE YOU ENGINEER AT ALL.
Cause I am. ;) The ship structure is not design in order to support it's own weight without collapsing. You put a ship with 250 m of leght supported only in both extremities and the middle section stress will collapse the ship and broke him in two.
Moscovo 1 year ago 2
@Moscovo if you say your a ship engineer or whatevs you wwould know that a ship is a she or her ,only a warship would b refered to as a he but evn the bismark was called a she (not including the captain who refered to her as a he)
jaiden123WET 1 year ago
@jaiden123WET
Excuse me sir. Your best theory to attack my facts is to say that I'm not an engineer by saying that I refered the gender of a ship or boat? I do know that in general (not always!) a ship is called by "her". It's very old the origin of that. But have you ever consider that I'm not even English. Or that english is not my native language? Have you considered that in may country it's used both genders to refer the ship?
Moscovo 1 year ago
@jaiden123WET
Have you consider that embarked people are more connected to the roots of the "her" and "she" use? Have you considered that it is more often used the"she" in the military then in the civilian branch? Have you even thought that I could have by mistake put "him" instead of "her"? I don't know.
Why do you even bother to make a comment like that. Are you adding anything important or interesting to the debate. Are you have arguing against my theory?
What is your purpose?
Moscovo 1 year ago
@jaiden123WET
Sir you don't have to reply to all comments that appear on Youtube.
My intention is not to offend you. But I hope you understant my revolt when someone questions something that took me 7 years of study to achieve.
Have a nice day.
Best regards.
Moscovo 1 year ago
ggg
Moscovo 1 year ago
sei un idiota
ilselvatico 1 year ago
i acctually belive the two-piece theory because that's what wikipedia said. oh wait people make up that stuff but i still think its 2-piece due to the structure failing.
starball23 1 year ago
that was not what happend when it went down i cracked in half
benhutton1999 1 year ago
Didn't the survivors of the Titanic say that it split. I would believe them more then scientists. After all scientists are the ones that came up with the pointless and untrue evolution theory.
vetwannabe8ball 1 year ago
Explorers and scientist have proven that the break in the hull was clean broken all the way down to the double plated bottom. Then as pressure increase as more water took on, the stress broke the bottom. It is believed that the ship separated beneath the water but the damage was done on the surface. the top of the ship was stronger than the bottom, Most of the damage was at the top of the ship. Currents capsized the ship as it sank.
madhadder2000 1 year ago
The Titanic definitely split in 2 above the surface: it had an expansion joint that was poorly designed and resultantly served as the little chip that started the crack which split it in two when the ship couldn't sustain its own weight.
svnelmntsnotfour 1 year ago
man the captain was stupid not to turn south and heed the iceberg warnings
Mr41432 1 year ago
I'm just giving a blind shot in the dark, but what if the chambers meant to keep the ship from sinking had an effect on how it sank? weight could be distributed to the front, since it was a head on collision, and the boat would sink and the rest would follow. Thus the ship would stay in tact.
1objection 2 years ago
wenn der singt dan muss das schiff auch durch brechen schau doch den film an
Leipziger93 2 years ago
There were so many eyewitnesses to the sinking who survived that the matter should be fact not speculation. One problem: The White Star Line crew lied about the ship not breaking in two to try to cover their asses, as if not willing to admit anything bad about the ship, as if it's all the iceberg's fault. Screw them. It's the crew's fault. They had plenty of iceberg warnings. HUMAN ERROR runs rampant. And once the government runs health care, there'll be new meaning to human error! Wait & see.
JoeyFudd 2 years ago
@JoeyFudd Britain has had a National Health Care system in place for over 60 years, and it still beats the American system!
lambhdeargh 2 years ago
No, it doesn't. Ask anyone who's used it. The wait is too long; the doctors barely speak English. The cancer survival rates are much lower than in the USA. C'mon! Do the research! Gov't could not even manage FNMA. Medicare is full of fraud, and doctors are refusing more patients with it everyday. Obama-Care will cost everyone more in taxes and deliver a worse product. It's lose/lose. Politicians win by claiming victory and asking for your votes in return, suckers!!!
JoeyFudd 2 years ago
@JoeyFudd I think you should stop relying on propaganda son lol
Do the research!
lambhdeargh 2 years ago
Don't be a patronizing smug arrogant fool, calling me "son," as if you know better. You haven't done the research I mentioned yet, or you would understand why the Brit's and Canadians come to the USA for their health care. One Canadian was denied care, because he forgot his official card. When he went home to get it, he died of acute appendicitis. He was in his 20's. The bureaucrat said he did nothing wrong, just followed procedure. No one wants petty officials playing king with their life.
JoeyFudd 2 years ago
When I try to do it on sketchup alls it does is not pick the stern up but it just sinks down without doing anything else. Is there something I'm doing wrong?
sweetnessboy1 2 years ago
The Ship Broke in Half because between the 3rd and 4th funnel is an air shaft above the boilers, with allows air and light through. As the Pressure built that when it was almost vertical, it couldn't take the pressure(because the ship itself was 892/5 feet) and split.
LinkinParkPwnsU 2 years ago
Only the 4th funnel was a dud the other three were proper funnels.
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
If not for Leonardo Di Caprio and a bunch of horney teenagers, we would have forgotten all about it. The power of Hollywood. I am sorry though about the real tragedy. I can only imagine the valient courage of the condemned and the painful memory of those who felt guilt for their own survival. LIfe is precious, Hollywood is not...thanks Gianni
giannivee1 2 years ago
A very good theory, one i heard is that the ship broke in two above water but did not detach itself until completley submerged, they reckon the keel or the spine of the ship held it together then finally broke when several meters under water, one reason for the sloping decks on the bow aswell is that when breaking it tore the sides away and therefore they collapsed on eachother when it landed on the sea bed, the stern damage they think was caused by huge amounts of air still trapped inside.
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
The visual evidences at heart of the Atlantic erase the possibility of the collapse in a single piece, the two parts at heart are several hundreds of meters separated. The pressure differential of the sustenation of the part without water with respect to the one of full water prow is of several thousands of tons impossible to resist mechanically, was simply not designed for similar pressure.
jcfdezmx 2 years ago
I love how these assholes gave this video a one star rating before even letting the video explain itself. Kids, leave ratings to the grownups. PLEASE.
Ptylersworld 2 years ago
I think there are more important things to worry about in life than this.
dekusnake 2 years ago
how do you make them
Troyshock 2 years ago
it was impossible for it not to split cos since it was hit on the right side, physics proves that since more water was coming in from the right than from the left list was a certainty so ut theorys shit
RFCKB2K9 2 years ago
it defentley split in two cos ppl found two parts of the titanic underwater and they were like two miles from each other
GamerDude652 2 years ago
The two sections of Titanic are about half a mile apart, you are probably thinking of how far down the ship is, which is 2 and a half miles!!
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
umm there is a story that the titanic NEVER gone vertical like in the movie and the bow didnt go 30 meters in tha air!
it only was around 14 meters in the air but the metal was heated and in split becuz the weight at the nose was to much
but the actual explanation of the sinking of the titanic will we never know
theTF2sniper 2 years ago
They ment it rose at a 30 degree angle not 30 metres, but how the TITANIC sank will be a mystery forever untill some clever person invents a time machine lol!!
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago 8
Not that big of a mystery really... The answer is quite simple, The Ship designers for whatever reason only made the first four (4) compartments of the ship watertight, the other 12 only went so far so the water could go over the tops. (I guess they figured they would be able to see anything in time to turn..) Either way the Iceburg cut a hole in the first five (5) compartments which allowed the water to continue leaking into the ship with the pumps unable to keep up it was then a matter of time
sergeantalpha 2 years ago
Yes i know all about the TITANIC i have copies of her original blueprints copies of the passenger and crew list and many books on how she was built how she sank what order the lifeboats went in, i even have a copy of one of the hearings with Ismay, so i know all about the compartments but thanks for sharing your knowledge, it is nice to see someone actually knows something about the ship as i have encountered some bloody idiots who don't know jack shit about the TITANIC who think they do.
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
yeah the bad thing is if they had rammed the iceburg instead of turning they wouldn't have sank, just smashed in the front of the ship
sergeantalpha 2 years ago
You are correct had they done this, then yes the TITANIC would not of sank but merely had a broken nose and then she would of limped to New York, but had this happened then the ship wouldn't of been famous or rather infamous as she actually is.
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
@CHRISTINKER86 nice
eeveev16 1 year ago
@CHRISTINKER86 the titanic would not have sunk if it went at the iceberg head on but because it turned it scraped the side of it making a huge hole right down the side filling all of the hulls
wightknight121 1 year ago
@CHRISTINKER86 they already found out how the titanic sank but i think its just 99% true thers always 1 thing missing and thats:we never have seen what happent whith our own eyes what they are saying about how the titanic sank is just from investegations :D + there weren't cameras back then right? or video makers or somthing
Perfixionn 4 months ago
@CHRISTINKER86 But an Titanic 1997 film shows very realistic sinking.
stellaruniversexmpls 2 months ago
the metal was heated by the fire dumbo. but your right about people saying it split in two.
dathmoll25 2 years ago
your all insane
spartan4821 2 years ago
interesting theory, but I have to apologize that it's irrelevant. How does steel become heated in 28 degree water? Frail steel from the freezing water temperature would cause the steel to break apart easily, but that doesn't explain why those who survived told their story of how they saw that ship break apart, before it's final plunge. That is why the break before going down theory is probably more likely, because people saw it happen. And the evidence on the ocean floor backs it completely.
Rob2hfu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
actually it was the victim of a giant squid attack, and that is why it was so mangled.
God Lives Underwater!
(DaMMn them underwater UFO bases!) poor jack. ... at least he got some bo-bo before he died o.k. !(\ (\
. (~.~)
o(('|("|
abacab987 2 years ago
it was ment to split and a chimney thingey at the top fell off and where is the iceburg?
tardisbill 2 years ago
i may have spelled some words wrong heres the correct translation reck-wreck part 1/ cup-cut part 1/ help from experiment from part 1/ get a slinky eraser or hamburger bend it down (not up) watch the top get cleanly cut the bottem gets smashed and you might see ripples at the bottem OK if you have questions just mail me on youtube bye
scienceguy474 2 years ago
part 2///so the double bottem is the only thing holding titanic together it starts to fail tons of water poor in bending titanic the other way the upper decks get mangled at smashed while the bottem gets almost a perfect cut then titanic pulls the stern verticle the double bottem seperates and titanic plunges to its doom!!!
scienceguy474 2 years ago
i dont belive it broke at a 30-45degree angle if that happened the top of the reck would be clean cut and the bottem smashed if you have a slinky eraser or hamburger watch the top get clean cup and the bottem getting smashed so look at the wreck photos from robert ballard look at the breakup point the top is smashed the bottem clean cut so i belive titanic split at 11 or 12degrees this is how it will work the titaning begins spliting in two the double bottem///part 2 is next comment
scienceguy474 2 years ago
if you think about it, the Titanic was going 30 knots heading to the bottom (2 vertical miles!!!!) so when it hit the ocean floor, obviously it won't land just regular. we're talking dynamite blowing up. over 600 feet of dynamite(bow section) so obviously the free decks would either fall down (like the end of the bow section or fall of completly. im trying to explain it into a video, but its hard to really show it.
mariopatrick123 2 years ago
2 and a half miles actually LOL!!
CHRISTINKER86 2 years ago
basically, yes, lol but you get wut im saying.
mariopatrick123 2 years ago
i don't think this is the explaination becaues it broke into 2
jenla14 2 years ago
Congrats
leofarias 2 years ago
I saw the 1997 movie. And when the ship landed on the bottom of the Atlantic, the stern imploded during the trip down due to that part of the stern had air instead of water. And so much water pressure in the stern was fighting against the air presure, and caused it to implode. The hill filled up completely with water. The 1997 movie is oine of my favorite. It's a well detailed movie showing what goes on inside a ship when it sinks along with several dos and don'ts in ship operation.
Streetcar1743 2 years ago
my grandma saw the titanic split she was on it!!!
cmtrains 2 years ago
Whats your Grandma's namE?
XZVStarX 2 years ago
why
cmtrains 2 years ago
Cause u said she saw the titanic split.
XZVStarX 2 years ago 8
ya know,
actually when the titanic sunk it tilted at a diagonal degree. And then due to gravity, the ship snapped in half (im not sure if it was half exactly), and sunk. Which is why the ship is not in one full part. Its in two. So cmtrains your grandma is correct. (if what you say is true about her being there when the Titanic sunk).
jonathanpulphus 2 years ago
when the Titanic was at a 30 or 45 degree angle, the keel wasnt strong to support the weight of water, which can cause to ship to break up, there is no possible way for a ship to be at a 90 degree angle intact, if u take a look at the titanic movie, a night to remember, it sank at 45 degrees, without breaking up, the 1997 film featured the ship breaking up that started in the boat deck and down to the keel, which caused the stern to falls backwards, it is my expert opinion right now
Hquidditchfan 2 years ago
Comment removed
scienceguy474 2 years ago
Titanic didn't sink like that it sank not like in the movie Titanic from 1997 it sank another way
SMGJohn 2 years ago
how does viscosity of the water come into play? ask surviour accounts, they will tell you what happened
canti1988 2 years ago
question next would be how did it break in 2? and end up as far as they did apart?
thunderdpa 2 years ago
Hi. I really liked the video. I think the same as you. The ship sank and broke under water because of the water pressure pushing towards it as it goes down, they go towards each other until Titanic cant ake ann more and the bottom splits then water pushes its way through the cracks and breaks it in half. As the two peices g down they get further away from each other and then the bottom hull breaks away from the stern of the ship. Wilksey10.
wilksey10 2 years ago
good theory one thing the bow would taken more damge if it hit then broke up
brandonannette 2 years ago
i was read wrong sorry
secondaryboy 3 years ago
it could be possible, he did say that it broke apart underwater because of the weakening of the metal because of the stress, pressure, and the stress.
shiptech2k9 3 years ago
fake, fake, fake, fake, titanic was broke in two piece, waste of time
secondaryboy 3 years ago
"Titanic - One Piece Sinking Theory"
"One Piece Sinking"
"One Piece"
"[wuhn] [pees]"
I think we all already know.
europeantheater 3 years ago
it wasn't presented as a new truth. pay more attention and stop being so aggressive
sorenti 3 years ago
so what if its not real. its just a theroy. ohh stop complaining, if you dont like then dont watch it. you must like it though to talk about it. So overall, the video isnt the fake, you are!!!
wilksey10 2 years ago
this was a waist of time...there the theory of whole boat sinking. people who survived the titanic state that it did split and it did sink as told in all the history videos and movies, so no its not true....
spoilme2010 3 years ago
good for you, youre a trisome, I'm thinking number 21. think about the weight. Could you even imagine?? THink for A sec. Nevertheless, regardless of your incompetence, it doesn't really matter. . . look at the movie, if it's EVEN a reasonable designation of what may have taken place. . . what a motherfucker. . .RIGHT?? Who cares who EXACTLY it happened, it happened, and it must've been terrifying.
eschlimm 3 years ago
How fast is this time lapsed?
frogg220 3 years ago
one very hard part of you theory to explain would be "if the the ship broke upside down then how did it manage to land right side up?" also one could theorize that the g-force produced by the sudden stop at the ocean floor could explain the bent down deck.
AFGSAD 3 years ago
I agree. I've always felt that the collapsed decks on the aft part of the bow section were caused by the impact on the ocean floor. Plus, all the witness accounts that describe a leveling of the stern before Titanic sank suggests the ship broke at the surface.
zesty32102 3 years ago
right
captainluigi112 3 years ago
my only problem with this is so many people state they saw the ship rise almost vertical... break in two...and the stern fell back horizontal.
jeffbrister2004 3 years ago
i cud blivet this but only if the bow boobed back up after the break up
runemyrhino12 3 years ago
I think it is a very good theory.. Because, after titanic sank, and every1 was in new york (I mean the survivors) man started to find out, why it sank.. So, they asked many, and Mr. Lightholler told that it went down in one peace.. But we dont know...
Thekillermand 3 years ago
By the way if it sank in one part the whole backside would have exploded because the air stuck inside of that enormous ship had to make tis way out.
MebefromBelgium 3 years ago
Its a stupid theory. Consider the weight of the ship. Theres so way the ass end of the ship went all the way up 90 degrees, and sunk right down, It just doesnt work that way. Consider eye witness accounts, close examination of the wreckage, and common sense, A ship that size doesnt, and cant lift up out of the water 90 degrees, and sink without breaking in two.
RiceReaper 3 years ago
the 'ass' end is called a stern
a4o31 3 years ago
I know what its called. But the fact remains, a ship that size simply cannot sink that way. Not how it was designed. Enough damage was done to the stern on the ship from the air trapped inside becoming compressed and blowing out. Thats why you hardly ever see pictures of it, Theres not that much to see. If the entire ship stayed togather, most of the ship would have been destroyed by escaping air; Dont fuck with air pressure lol
RiceReaper 3 years ago
same as the chipmunk dude
badblb 3 years ago
i have herd a theory that the titanic sunk in one pice stright down but the reason the found it broken was becase it hisd the ground like it had sunk and snaped in halfe can anyone confirm???????????
alexfadd 3 years ago
There are several theories; some say it sank on the surface, some say underwater. Right now, evidence points towards a surface split. This is a video that would demonstrate an underwater split, how the Titanic sank in one piece.
Medessec 3 years ago
thanx ;)
alexfadd 3 years ago
@Medessec dude the pieces were like far away from each other no way underwater split
iSewil 1 year ago
I agree with cheesychipmonk95
The stern is practicly destroyed, becuase it had so much trapped air in it when it went down.
colinwhytock 3 years ago
i think this sounds about right. thats a good theory. it sounds more acurate than most of the ones iv heard
avrilgurl14 3 years ago
The Titanic sank in two pieces, as confirmed by the discovery of the wreck. The stern was badly wrecked because there was some air trapped inside. As she plummented to the bottom, the air was forced out which caused the decks to be blown apart. My personal belief is the 30 degree angle theory.
cheesychipmonk95 3 years ago 2
My personal belief is the 11-degree angle, opposite splitting theory... although I do believe the Titanic broke at the surface, from my own opinion and by testimony taken by survivors (it could go either way, but this is what I believe).
Also, Titanic DID sink with a list; water was rushing in from the starboard side (in 1912 hard-a-starboard was a turn to port; and the iceberg was on the starboard side, or right), and causing an imbalance in the weight distribution of the ship ;)
kate1912cat 3 years ago
Titanic should have sank with a list, but it probably didnt because the bulkheads had no lids on them, the water just ran in freely and was able to fill the ship up like a glass of water. As the water entered, it pretty much had no obstruction to its flow. And was even more easily distributed as the ships structure started to fail. Windows breaking,, The splitting of the hull, possibly in more places then one.
The 11-12 degree angle does make more sense then a 30. Given the evidence
RiceReaper 3 years ago
ya =) but no one really knows
a4o31 3 years ago
well no one knows 100% but things like these leave very clear signs about what happened, Things like metal fituge and obvious damage. a ship as large sinking in one peice would have much more air trapped inside and would have exploded vioently underwater, It cant break as cleanly underwater as it did on the surface, thats just common sense.
RiceReaper 3 years ago
ya.
a4o31 3 years ago
this was proven to be inncorrect very recently. i understand ur idea, but they haven proven recently that it spilt above water.
TV337 3 years ago
The stern then falls back to the water and because of the twisted double bottom turns, and sinks at a 90 degree angle.
BrownAnimeNetwork 3 years ago
But I think different. I think the ship split at a higher angle of 15 degrees , then the split started. It stopped at the double bottom and the force was enough to have the stern fall back to the water. The small section of the exposed bow at the split also falls backdown. This pushes the split middle below the water line and then raises the stern to 45 degrees. Meanwhile the double bottom has been twisted down and now up. It then fails, and breaks.
BrownAnimeNetwork 3 years ago
The newest theory is that The Titanic split at an angle of 11 degrees. The split stopped at the double bottom hull. Then water filled where the split was and pulled the middle down. The Titanic Split the other way.
BrownAnimeNetwork 3 years ago
i dont believe it and the reason the stern is so mangled is because after the titanic sank the water was still moving down with it downblast the water moved at the rate it sank like 70 mph so it basically tore the stern up good theory but highly unlikely
camaros4every1 3 years ago
25 knots =)
a4o31 3 years ago
the vid would hve been good.if you knew how titanic realy sank oh i think it would be some waht hards for it to break in water bow first how would the stern have time to fall apart like it did i seen a picture of the stern and it was i meesed up.i miad a good truthful point.say somting about that gravity my but watch survivers say how it sank and dont say that the old pepole would not have remembered for them im sure they probaly would not forget IT WAS A NIGHT TO REMEMBER .
rdj9606 3 years ago
no i was wacthing survivers say how it sank one siad "i didnt close my eyes i wacthed that ship break in half"you would not know you was not there.please dont even say im rong i seen survivers say on my titanic document
rdj9606 3 years ago
the song was great, even though the theory seems impossible
2701ace 3 years ago
Thats not how it sunk
sublimeknight129 3 years ago
nope. Just a theory. Many say it sunk in two pieces. I actually drift closer to the theory where it split at the surface, and sunk in two-pieces. This is the theory that it sank above the surface in one piece and split at some point beneath the surface.
Medessec 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
the6haunted7mansion 3 years ago
Titanic's sten has 2 theories. 1, the most commonly know is that when the pressure from all the trapped air in the stern following forced it's way out of the ship on the way down the pressure caused it to explode out causing the mangled mess the other that many don't know is based on the stange way the propeller's bent. They believe that stern slammed into the floor at the every end and the hard slam caused the steel to mangle. Both of their theories could b right but urs doesn't make since
GWTWobsessed 3 years ago
This theory is ridiculous there is no proof and the fact that most items in titanic remain in their position from before the sinking disprove this theory if this was the case dishes (which remain in their spots) furniture etc would be tossed around and there would have been more damage how do u explain it being right side up not to mention in every test titanic sinks in a falling leaf patter with a back and forth motion and even when tested in once pice it never flips.
Cluelessguy69 3 years ago
The sheer mass of the Titanic, and the force of gravity definately would have split it as it were still submerging. There are also testimonials from survivors that state it did break above water. One of the radiomen that send the SOS signal was in a lifeboat just under the rudder, and reported that it fell down nearly ontop of their craft.
WesMetal13 3 years ago
i dont think this was true.. just saying but not sure
drew108A 3 years ago
sorry, im just saying, not trying to be mean or anything
a4o31 3 years ago
sorry im not trying to either. i understand the way it went down. its hard to explain. its like evolution. You know thats most likely what happened, but there are other ways it could have happened. to be honest no one will know exactly what happened, its something that happened in the middle of the ocean 90 something years ago. but yeah its hard to tell someones tone when your typing, so my apologies as well.
bengalman17 3 years ago
idk there are a lot of holes in this theory. For it to work i believe that there would have to be an implosion of some sort, not a clean break underwater. If an implosion is the case the bow would be in far worse condition than it is now. But its alway nice to have an alternate theory, right?
bengalman17 3 years ago
acutally, the stern stuck up out of the water, it got 2 heavy and collapsed, causing it to crack in half
a4o31 3 years ago
ok did you watch the video? its a theory that the ship sank in one piece. i am dismissing the theory because i feel it is impossible without an underwater implosion. the stern didnt stick way out of the water like you think. there was damage on the bottom of the ship, which caused the superstructure to crack and break from the bottom up. it wasnt because it was too heavy. it didnt reach a high angle. its back was already broken before it could have ever lifted out of the water.
bengalman17 3 years ago
Ok but how was the bottom of the ship damaged? By what?
This theory really does not work at all
Kambanicity 3 years ago
you sued skethup to do this??
how
baptistepcarrara 3 years ago
lol funny. sorry it broke in half.there is no way it could stay in one piece. funny and cute that you think it could though
itsxrayrayxbeotch 3 years ago
He doesn't think it, if I'm reading it correctly, he is just presenting what it'd look like if it were true until he can make the breakup version possible.
travelsonic 3 years ago
btw, what IS this song called?
Coolness501 3 years ago
Instrumental version of "My heart will go on" by Celine Dion.
Cirux321 3 years ago
ok if it split under the water then it would of split the second it went under because it would make a difference 10 minutes later. also it makes no sence it broke in two under the water because it would split that means its strong enough to hold all the water without breaking in half and it would just go down.
kittenamos 3 years ago 2
kittenamos please rewrite what you said so it makes more sence please and thank you.... i can only get the idea of what your saying but not the whole thing.
douggw 3 years ago
err.. nevermind, i was completely off on that one, -_-
Coolness501 3 years ago
isn't this song called sleeping sun or something? i recognize it kinda've i am like 99% sure that it's sleeping sun by nightwish.
Coolness501 3 years ago
I think that this is just about exactly what happened, the Titanic did not go down in a 90 degree angle, like some people, and the movie say. In fact, it went down at about a 30 degree angle, causing the middle section of the ship to rise, and fall again. the titanic broke in half about a mile underwater, and drifted about 1,970 feet away from each other. the back of the ship hit the ocean floor so hard, causing it to basically explode on the impact.
Coolness501 3 years ago
the ship did break in half above the water but in my opinion the bow pulled the stern down with it and then they went their seperate ways after the ship sank all the way down. think about it, the stern had trapped air locked inside and if nothing pulled it down, it would have floated and not gone under. the ship sank with an 80 degree angle
thwepz 3 years ago