I say, Let homosexuals get married but with a stipulation that IF, just IF they decide that they want to raise children, they Must only Adapt. Reason being is that they will then limit the amount of homosexual genetics that they put into the gene pool of humanity and thus eventually will be "selected out" because of their own desire to be together. Simple answer....
Euthansia. This is the one that ultimately turned me Christian. I had to read a book a couple yrs ago called 'angels of death'. It was about the currently widespread practice of illegal euthanasia. Apparently the majority of euthanised people are young HIV patents.
That was before I found HIV is not the cause of AIDS. All truth eventually leads to Jesus
Your argument is circular, you are using the physical world to prove the physical world.
Your friends could very well be part of your delusional "reality" and not be real at all, but to you they will appear real in your mind.
So that argument won't work. You haven't shown any evidence on why you are not just a brain in a vat, except a faithful assumption. Seems like "scientism" takes a shit here and science isn't all powerful...oh well
@ rushfan000. lols why is your comment not posted here? You people demand for the truth then when confronted with the truth, you reject the truth and choose to believe what ever is comfortable for you to believe. This is why your government does not let you know things that are current.
BTW, this is my last reply, I think you are a troll and Im just wasting my time talking to you. Get a life.
@ThePrayerHotline How does the belief in super natural beings relate to the observation that the life forms on this planet have been changing over time? If you wish to believe in things like Yahweh or bigfoot, for which there is no evidence, that is fine. However, evolution is the principle on which all of biology is based and supported by mountains of evidence. So given the choice between imaginary friends in the sky and reality, I guess I will have to go with reality.
@oscargordon My friend. Its not a leap of faith without any basis. I demanded an answer & found a way to personally prove to myself that God exist. We being dead in the spirit cannot experience God because our sins separate us from Him. Since you cannot experience God, there is nothing stopping you from experiencing His enemy. If the enemy exist, then God exist. I did an experiment. I came face to face with the enemy and almost died. After that, I surrendered to God.
@oscargordon my friend, , I heard that Darwin once said that if the very basic elements that makes up a living thing is very complex, then his theory about evolution is wrong. Hmm, If he has said that and he is the one who introduce evolution, then you might want to take what he said into consideration.
@ThePrayerHotline You are confusing science with religion. An apple does not fall to the ground because Newton said so. The planets don't go around the sun in an ellipse because Kepler said so. Time does not slow and objects get more massive as they approach the speed of light because Einstein said so. It is completely irrelevant what Darwin said because he lived before the discovery of genes and DNA. He merely observed that life forms changed with time and selection pressures were involved.
@oscargordon My friend, your Einstein also said, that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Have you been following the news? Science recently found out that this is false.
Just because Einstein said so makes what he said to be infallible. :~)
@ThePrayerHotline The report the CERN physicists wrote actually question their own results and are looking for help from the scientific community to see if someone else can help find if they made an error or if the results are truly correct. It is the way science works. Only religion and the Pope talk about infallibility. If the data is correct, all it means is the science will modify itself, as it always does, and include that certain types of neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light.
@oscargordon My friend, I was a fan of Isaac Asimov and have been reading Science Digest back in the 70's, I recall having read some particles travelling faster than the speed of light but only lives for a short micro second. I was surprise why the recent news of travelling faster than light was treated as new. :~)
Btw, i dont follow religion, religion cant save you but only a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ. The roman catholic church is a "pagan" religion. The pope is not a christian.
@rushfan000 I also recall coming up with noise cancellation in the mid 60's and is only recently that you got noise cancelling headphones. I also recall reading from my uncles magazine in the early 60's a 1950's airplane which is now your stealth airplane. You people think you are up to date with technology but what the government lets you know is old technology.. The cell phone was almost a decade already in my country before they introduce it here in america.
@ThePrayerHotline saying that 'only a relationship with Jesus Christ can save you.'
is like saying, don't listen to what anyone else says about your imaginary friend, just try to have a personal relationship with him.
-
that way you don't get stuck defending undefendable points, you can blow anything off by saying, well thats not what i believe. While still feeling like you are maintaining a solid reason for belief.
@panda0100 my friend to you, God is an imaginary being because you cant fellowship with Him. If you believe my God is an imaginary friend, wow, you have more faith than me because you admitedly believe that I have a God which you cant see or comprehend if He truly exist.
@ThePrayerHotline yes, i believe god exists, but ONLY in the minds of those who believe he exists.
this does not mean that he exists as YOU would define him.
nor does it mean that i "cant see or comprehend if He truly exist." because if he exists only as an imaginary thing. then i CAN comprehend such a being.
(btw fellowship is a Noun, so no, i can't "fellowhsip with him." but neither can you.)
@panda0100 If God doesn't exist in your mind, then what are you talking about? Why talk about nothing in your mind? lol I believe you are just bored and have plenty of time to waste.
@ThePrayerHotline i wasn't talking about my mind, but yours. and because in my mind. god is just YOUR idea. while in your mind god is an actual being.
making him a figment of your imagination, and exsists ONLY as a figment of YOUR imagination.
since we were talking about the existance of god, it would be irrelevent to talk about where he does NOT exist (my mind) but where he does, (your mind)
@panda0100 Dear friend, sorry I wasn't able to reply sooner. I have been having internet connection. Anyway, i hope the new year brings you new opportunities to realize. In response to what you said....I know I could talk to you but I never saw you with my own eyes, now does that mean you are just a figment of my imagination? :~)
Now if you've never seen me, but just see the evidence that I exist, I reply back to your comments, do you think im your imaginary friend?
#2 Sorry, I just can't wrap my head around the concept of Yahweh coming to Earth to sacrifice himself to himself so that he could forgive humans for not following the laws that he had given to Moses. A good majority of those laws are pretty atrocious, so I personally don't see any reason why I should be forgive for not following them.
I thought Noah put a pair (or five pair) of each kind of animal on the ark? Are you saying that he disobeyed Yahweh and refused to collect up T-Rex or velociraptors for the ark so they were all killed in the flood?
How is it humanly possible to stand in from of the camera and say these sorts of things with a straight face?
In the west, marriage is a civil union and only a civil union, not a religious one. The marriage certificate is a civil document. Unless you have gone through the legal, civil procedure you are not married by law and are not entitled to any benefits given to married couples.
All the Christian church does is give it 'God's blessing'. Same goes for any other religious wedding ceremony in the west.
Wait, what? You do know that we only started using farm animals in like the last 10,000 years right? That's not enough time for there to be fossils of humans and chickens next to each other.
Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned
2 Corithians 5:21 "He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
Leviticus 17:11 11 For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life.
May I please suggest an answer to question # 1 ? When the flood came, the whole world went underwater in just a short span of time. It was a flash flood which meant erosion happened and since dinosaurs are heavier than man, its only natural that they will sink deeper in the mixture of mud and water. :~)
@ThePrayerHotline During the time that dinosaurs lived, animals came in all sizes, not just big ones like T-Rex and Allosaurus. Fossil beds from the Mesozoic era have animals of all different sizes in the same layer. The geologic record does not have animals separated by size.
You know it is quite easy to look these things up on the web don't you rather than just making stuff up with no basis in reality?
@oscargordon Very well my friend, please provide for the link to support your claim that dinosaurs of big and small are exactly on the same depth when they got swept up by the flood.
@ThePrayerHotline This information isn't top secret you know. Are you saying that all of those paleontologists have been lying and covering up the "fact" that animals are sorted in the geologic record by size? Wiki Paleobiota and you can then see a list of a lot of fossil sites and from there see what animals have been found at each site, for instance Morrison Formation. Go to to a library and get information from real paleontologists instead of the lies from Creationist web sites.
@ThePrayerHotline First may I inform you that I can not provide you with a link because YouTube will not allow anybody to provide links. What I did provide you with was the ability to go to your web browser and then go to Wikipedia and then type some words into Wikipedia's search so that you could see a list of animals found at a particular level and from there you could go to articles on each animal and find their size. But I bet that was too much work for you.
@oscargordon My friend, so wikipedia is your source of information? From what ive heard, its not very reliable.
Havent been there for a long time but sometime ago, they ask readers to contribute information if the readers feels they know more than the contents of the page.
@ThePrayerHotline What source would you find acceptable? I am sure Answers in Genesis will think that Wikipedia is not reliable since it contradicts every piece of crazy they lie about. Are you saying the Wikipedia article on the Morrison Formation is not accurate and those animals were not found there? If so, you are free to edit the Wiki page and say that it is all incorrect and enter all of the animals that were truly found there. Make sure they are all the same size while you are at it.
so before these fossils were known as dinosaurs these fossils were known as dragons........ok i agree but why is it impossible for you to grasp the concept humans have seen these fossils for 1000`s of years and conjured up stories of beasts and dragons.....are you suggesting no dinosaur bones were ever seen by man before 1800?
You mention every continent on the planet for record of man living with dinosaur(dragon) . Out of interest if you do a follow up to this video at any stage could you include the continent often referred to as Australia (So Australia, PNG and the few other small islands) and Antarctica as I was not aware man lived on Antarctica till recently
Regarding the flood, could people simply have been better at temporarily escaping being buried (in the early days of the flood beginning) in mud and therefore fewer and less deep human fossils actually be formed?
Hey VFX :) I'd just like to point to a clear description of a dinosaur in Job 40:15 onwards. Many believe the so called "Behemoth" (Spelling altered from Greek translation) is actually a sauropod of some kind :)
Brother your answer to #2 was unbiblical and inconsistent. Jesus never took all the wrath of God upon Him, the cup was suffering of man--see that James and John said they would take the same cup.
Also if you believe all of God's wrath is gone, you've never read Revelation(I know you have, but it's clear, His wrath is not gone)---if you think His wrath is gone for all tho, then you're a universalist(I know you're not). Think about it brother. You're slipping into semi-Calvinism.
if so called dragons were such a big part of our lives back then (see pictures of slaying/riding supposive dinosours) then you would have to admnit it would be very likely that we would have found bones next to them. your first argument is that there were fewer people than dinos, then you flip around and say they were huge parts of our lives. if they were they would have been found in all sorts of accounts such as plato, socrates, etc...
Okay, your logic is not consistent--if you kill the dinosaur/dragon--you're not going to sit next to it and die. Next, society would have killed most of them off due to fear, so there would be much fewer of them in time.
Next you hold up some other accounts of philosophers with which have no more justification to believe or dinos could have mostly been gone.
Last, dinos aren't smarter than humans--so during the flood, who's going to live longer and who'll be buried first/second?
No, five is not a better answer than ten because they are both wrong. There are no half-measures in the purely logic-based world of mathematics. It's akin to people who get annoyed that the lottery numbers are one away from the ones on their ticket. It doesn't matter if you're one away or forty-eight away, it's still wrong.
Yes, I am convinced that we kill them, because King David says that the killing bears and lions, but then you see, the remaining animals in the area, and there is no, because people as who colonized, was killing the animals that I consider that I thought were harmful, so even there in the islands, with these terrible lizards (lizard comfortable) because the places that were somehow less inhabited, preserved wildlife.
well that's what I think. I have not the truth is only an opinion.
We do help people who are going to die. We give them too much morphine all the time. We know it will kill them. People do this all the time not to is kind of indefensibe sometimes.
"men can't give birth." Are you 100% sure about that? You might be in for a suprise. As for absolute morality proving christianity you might want to change that to is evidence for. Other cultures have had other ideas for an objective source of morality.
@ElProximo Your attempts to be a troll are totally transparent. Either that or you are too abysmally dense to understand what i was writing, quite clearly, by the way.
@ElProximo Typical biblical fundamentalism, mis-applied to the Lady Bird Bachmann issue. He is both effeminate and a closeted, self-hating homosexual. there are many, many masculine homosexuals. Lady Bird is not one of them. Your inability to read my postings accurately indicates the worst method of exegetical "thought."
Your philosophically flawed arguments don't help your homophobic cause at all.
@legofanatic12 i believe God had a plan of how long He wanted a day to be before creating a day (yom) just as a painter visualizes the finished product before he begins... next...
@legofanatic12 i believe God had a plan of how long He wanted a day to be before creating a day (yom) just as a painter visualizes the finished product before he begins... next...
Venom Fang X = Genius. It is true that some Christians hide away from discussions of faith, probably because they are scared that they don't have answers. However not all Christians do hide away. Christianity is supported by science. Aethiests hide away just as much.
1. There are no evidences of dragons in the 6th century as much as of any other "gods" or giant octopuses or mermaids or gnomes or phantoms or fairies.
2. If Jesus is God then He can't go to hell since He is outside Heaven or Hell or any place, even if He can manifest Himself inside any place.
3. Only a christian view allows an absolute standard of better? Why?
4. Revelation is useless, so no comments.
5. Ok
6. Ok, well Samson too, in a way. And in another way Jesus.
He wasn't saying that better can only be from a christian view, but he was saying that his answer relies upon accepting Christianity as true. To a muslim, the fully christian world would suck, or if you don't define "better" as we do, then what we think is better you would hate. Shawn kind of loopholed the question, but he basically said that of what he considers good, which most of us would, then yes, it would be substantially better.
@ecokrazy@ecokrazy "This response is directed at your #3" The primary message of Islam is to be kind to others, so in Islam a fundamental Christian world would be better than now. To a Jewish, Hindu, Buddhism, a similar reasoning can be done. Even to a atheist view. As long as no one goes into the killing in name of God thing.
No, the primary message of the Koran is to be kind to others. The message of Islam (including the Hadith which is considered a holy writing with more authority than the koran because the later writings overrule the first) is to bring the entire world under submission to islam, and exterminate jews and christians. That message is repeated over and over in all the subsequent writings of Islam.
@ecokrazy That's a biased view of Islam, isn't it? I bet if you ask Muslims if the Hadith should be in the base for the legal laws of a country most of them would say no. As most of them don't even accept the same texts as the body of the Hadith. And I doubt any non-extremist Islamist and probably most extremists do not believe that the extermination of Jews and Christians is the base of Islam.
No I'm not saying that due to pride in my own faith or hate of Islam. I'm saying that as someone who has studied it in a university setting and has had time to look at what it says. As for what the people choose to believe, you can liken it to Christians that support homosexuality, or a Hindu who doesn't believe in a pantheon. The religion itself makes a claim, and the followers sometimes choose to not listen. The later surpasses the former, and the later calls for murder
@edgarrsoares2 I think that you would find that the majority of Muslims are called by their own religion and faith to make the Sunna law. Obviously you have no idea of how Muslims think.
God outlines the purpose of marriage and whatnot starting Genesis 2:18–25. Leviticus 18:22 specifically speaks out against homosexual conduct. Mark 10:6, a New Testament or New Covenant writing again stipulates God's view on marriage. Romans 1:26–27 again speaks against homosexuality, noting there is a penalty. 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 is the verse Shawn cites where they will not inherent God's kingdom with 1 Timothy 1:9-10 testifying the same.
@ecokrazy "And this one to your #7" There is a penalty for homosexuality but not for same sex marriage. There is no direct quote forbidding same sex marriage.
True, but that's because it was irrelevant at the time. If homosexuality was forbidden, obviously homosexual union was forbidden as well. It's just the next logical step. That said, Jesus loves all and forgives everyone of every sin without showing favoritism. It isn't at all about what we can do to justify ourselves or our ideas, but the fact that we HAVE sinned one way or another, and have been offered forgiveness. He didn't come to count your sins against you, but to forgive.
@ecokrazy Well, woman on woman action is not forbidden, so women can marry. And Jacob was married with two sisters (18:18). And there's Leviticus 11:7. And 20:13, we must kill them.
In the OT its not, because the women knew it was abomination. One of the verses I quoted above however does say the women even did what was unsightly. As for Jacob, you're right, but that was through deception on the part of Laben, Rachel's father. Jacob did not sin. I think you misquoted 11:7 because that's dietary, and 20:13 reiterates homosexuality being condemned. The OT is not full of perfect people, just sinners like me who are forgiven in Jesus Christ. Mercy triumphs
@ecok Those of you who condemn the sinner for sin after they have claimed the work of the cross boggle my mind. Christ died ONE TIME on the cross for all mens sins, past, present and future. Which sins are you eliminating from that act? Christ made a full end of the law at the cross. My bible says concerning homosexuality that they did that which was unseemly and brought upon them the recompense of their error
What does this mean?
It does not mean a loss of salvation but a loss of rewards
I never did, and I'm sorry you read that. The recompense for their sin wasn't a loss of salvation or a loss of reward, it was illness and death brought by the sin itself. Christians aren't compatible with sin and won't live in it. There are two places which clearly denote that the sexually immoral and the homosexuals won't inherent the kingdom of God, and the original greek speaks of persistent sin. God judges for sin, and it's big, but I'm not condemning a sinner. I myself sin
@ecokrazy Where are you going to take me to to support your argument? Again show me which sins Christ did not die for ! You are making an effort to apply deeds and works to your salvation
Quote me 1Cor 5 where the Corinth man was sleeping with his own mother and as a result his flesh was given over to Satan for his destruction so that his spirit could be what? Oh yes, saved on the Day of Christ.
The Day of Christ is the "rapture"
Read 1Cor 3:15 and you will see believers suffer loss.
@ecokrazy What did Paul who is the Apostle to the Gentiles during the church age dispensation say concerning perpetual sin? Didnt he say something along the lines of, "that which I hate, I do"
God knew you would sin as a believer. That is why at the moment you believed in your heart the Lord Jesus, you experienced the circumcision made without hands of the PUTTING OFF THE SINS OF THE FLESH of the body
Christ paid for the sins that I have yet to commit. How do you deal with that statement?
That's identical do the scheme of thought I'm coming from, except I don't know how I feel about dispensationalism in the rapture sense, but that is neither here nor there. I'm really not sure what you read that I said that set you off, but whatever it was, you read it wrong. Everything you're saying to me is stuff I agree with, and really don't know where you're coming from.
@ecokrazy where is a quote for that? no, I haven't misquoted 11:7. I was just pointing out that this one is not so condemned in Christianity and wonder why.
20:13 actually talks about segregating them from the society. that's a bit harsh.
@edgarrsoares2 Romans 1:26-27 was the quote. The reason that we don't spend time on diet anymore is because in Acts...10 verse 9 Peter has a vision to kill unclean animals. This both signifies that God is reaching out the the non-Jews and God establishes all food to be eaten. The Law of the Old Testament is a school teacher that showed us what to do to be accepted of our own accord; no one ever fulfilled it except Jesus. It simply points us to Jesus as the forgiver of sins, because we need him.
@ecokrazy "The Law of the Old Testament is a school teacher that showed us what to do to be accepted of our own accord; no one ever fulfilled it except Jesus" You're saying that God changed His opinion about diet and, well, a lot of other stuff. So maybe he changed his opinion about homosexuality but the letter didn't made it to the Bible.
No, I'm not saying that at all. God never changed his mind. His code and his statutes are eternal. That's a good thing, because we know that 10,000 years into the future he wont change and be a jerk. The purpose of the dietary laws was to "Be Holy, for I AM holy," that Israel would stand out as unique. Since salvation is no longer given through the law and it's sacrifices certain unique things for the Jews no longer apply. Homosexuality is not one of those.
@ecokrazy "Since salvation is no longer given through the law and it's sacrifices certain unique things for the Jews no longer apply." That's a change.
Shawn has a few videos that talk about Jesus throughout the old testament. It's apparent as a change but it was the design of God since before the foundation of the world. After Jesus was raised from the dead he met with two disciples and pointed himself out through the entire old testament. Not a change, just incredible grace and forgiveness.
@ecokrazy "Not a change, just incredible grace and forgiveness." Yes, Shawn posted one new recently. I fail to perceive how come forgiveness is not a change. Once you had to be a Jew and to not to eat pork. Then you could not be a Jew and could eat pork. I would say that is a big change, no matter if Jesus appears in the old testament or not.
Salvation was NEVER through the law. And sacrifices only covered sin until Jesus came who actually took sin away once and for all. This is not a change this is a fulfillment of the law and the sacrifices.
@edgarrsoares2 The law is like a mirror that shows us our sin. Without the law we would not know what sin is. It reveals sin but does not save us from it. If we could be saved through the law Jesus would not needed to have been killed. Because Jesus paid for our sin, we obey God out of love, not as a means of our own salvation.
(Gal 2:21NIV) "I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!" (Gal 3:21 ESV) "Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law." Rom 4:13 "It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith."
@dbendele "It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world" Who wants to heir the world and for what?
Hebrews 7:19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God. Hebrews 10:1 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming--not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship. Acts 13:39 Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses.
@dbendele "Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses" Resuming, God made a pact, a law, useless and changed everything with Christ. Things changed then.
As to the second question, Christ did pay the exact same punishment (nothing more, nothing less) for the sins of those for whom He died. The fact that Christ was holy and righteous did not lessen His punishment. Christ drank down the full cup of the wrath of God like it was water, taking only three hours. It may actually be that the punishment was all the more intense due to this haste. The amount of punishment, however, remained the same.
Very good demonstration, clear and consist evidence that human coexist with big lizards, aka dinosaurs. Jesus paid for sin, and God delivered him on the 3rd day resurrection. He paid for our sin in full.
@venomfangx With the flood, the more intelligent animals sought higher ground, while the heavy, slow moving dinos got stuck in the mud and eventually were covered in it, thus fossilization. The reason why we don't find man in the fossil record is that we are floaters and bloaters. When the people died, they floated and rotted. When the waters assuaged and went down, they decomposed leaving the bones which in all likelihood are now dust.
On the revelation, I'm not convinced the revelation deals with a worldly revelation as much as it does with a personal revelation each human has to deal with upon leaving the world, but I don't know. Could be about the issue of the day (e.g. Nero) or the future. A very intelligent, well designed presentation..
If Historians found this much evidence all around the world about anything else they would say it is a Fact that men lived with dinousours, but since so many are being brainwashed by evol. so they refuse to admit the truth proven by overwhelming evidence. If you want the truth read Gods liviving Word the Bible Creator of all Jesus.
@BlitzHitz I dont need to God created everyone knowing God exists, but If you wish to learn more read Gods living word the Bible your Creator gave it to you a manual for humans on earth, if you ignore it your doomed.
@BlitzHitz Re read my last comment until you understand it, then follow the edvice then when you at leat semi know the Bible we can talk. Hint Faith is in John.
@BlitzHitz I take it were the oposite then, I was taught evol. my whole life and came to know the truth of Christ. What you want to talk about? If you want to talk about anything at any length, I sugest a message so we dont take over the comment section here.
Finally, you said that the bible says "homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God". That's NOT what the bible says. It says "the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God". Paul later includes arsenokoites on his list of the wicked which is translated into homosexual offenders in modern english. But the word was undefined before english translations and used to refer to many things. Regardless, the very next verse says they CAN inherit the kingdom if they come to Jesus Christ. (1 Cor 6:11)
Rev 21:7, 8 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers (sexually immoral), and sorcerers (those who practice divination, witchcraft, soothsaying, and drug users), and idolaters (those who worship other gods, including themselves), and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
@MessiahYeshuah I'm aware of that scripture thank you. Are you aware that it does NOT mention or reference homosexuals at all? And if you are aware of that, may I ask why you are posting it?
Also, your answer on gay marriage was satisfactory from a religious standpoint, but I think the question is referring to secular law and asking about your view of the legalization of gay marraige. It's obviously something that the bible doesn't support. But would you as a Christian lobby against it? Gay marriage certainly IS possible in secular governments whether you personally recognize it or not. So the question should really be do you think gay marragie should be legal?
I agreed with most of the points you made except for the last two (assisted suicide and gay marriage). I think you explained everything else fairly well from a biblical perspective, but your answer regarding assisted suicide was very weak. You say that suicide "is definetely something unbiblical to do" and "I think the bible would say that suicide is wrong". But those are not biblical answers. The bible in fact does NOT say suicide is wrong so what scriptures support this belief of yours?
@RaytownSoClassof2010 You should lift your mind to a higher level. "For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist."
@RaytownSoClassof2010 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty.
@ElProximo Well, isn't this a ridiculous posting? First, you tell me what I "don't" think? Do you have any idea how crazy that statement makes you sound?
Points 1 & 2 are even crazier. I DO NOT support the Bachmann's in anything they do. They are pestilential pockmarks on humanity.
I'm not going to repeat what I said above, except that you obviously can't be included among those with a "well trained mind."
I say, Let homosexuals get married but with a stipulation that IF, just IF they decide that they want to raise children, they Must only Adapt. Reason being is that they will then limit the amount of homosexual genetics that they put into the gene pool of humanity and thus eventually will be "selected out" because of their own desire to be together. Simple answer....
crazy77iii 1 week ago
actually 1 + 1 does equal 10.
MrWhiteBlur 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrWhiteBlur 2 weeks ago
If we exist, why can't God exist?
BlazyJon 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
Euthansia. This is the one that ultimately turned me Christian. I had to read a book a couple yrs ago called 'angels of death'. It was about the currently widespread practice of illegal euthanasia. Apparently the majority of euthanised people are young HIV patents.
That was before I found HIV is not the cause of AIDS. All truth eventually leads to Jesus
utubedetective72 1 month ago
@panda0100
Your argument is circular, you are using the physical world to prove the physical world.
Your friends could very well be part of your delusional "reality" and not be real at all, but to you they will appear real in your mind.
So that argument won't work. You haven't shown any evidence on why you are not just a brain in a vat, except a faithful assumption. Seems like "scientism" takes a shit here and science isn't all powerful...oh well
TimelessApologist 1 month ago
You don't even believe in dinosaur and humans now you just a idiot.
thefelts2 1 month ago
Damn green screens, at 5:18 I was thinking why on earth did they print the Belgian flag for Mali :p
Temenes 1 month ago
@ rushfan000. lols why is your comment not posted here? You people demand for the truth then when confronted with the truth, you reject the truth and choose to believe what ever is comfortable for you to believe. This is why your government does not let you know things that are current.
BTW, this is my last reply, I think you are a troll and Im just wasting my time talking to you. Get a life.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline How does the belief in super natural beings relate to the observation that the life forms on this planet have been changing over time? If you wish to believe in things like Yahweh or bigfoot, for which there is no evidence, that is fine. However, evolution is the principle on which all of biology is based and supported by mountains of evidence. So given the choice between imaginary friends in the sky and reality, I guess I will have to go with reality.
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon My friend. Its not a leap of faith without any basis. I demanded an answer & found a way to personally prove to myself that God exist. We being dead in the spirit cannot experience God because our sins separate us from Him. Since you cannot experience God, there is nothing stopping you from experiencing His enemy. If the enemy exist, then God exist. I did an experiment. I came face to face with the enemy and almost died. After that, I surrendered to God.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@oscargordon my friend, , I heard that Darwin once said that if the very basic elements that makes up a living thing is very complex, then his theory about evolution is wrong. Hmm, If he has said that and he is the one who introduce evolution, then you might want to take what he said into consideration.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline You are confusing science with religion. An apple does not fall to the ground because Newton said so. The planets don't go around the sun in an ellipse because Kepler said so. Time does not slow and objects get more massive as they approach the speed of light because Einstein said so. It is completely irrelevant what Darwin said because he lived before the discovery of genes and DNA. He merely observed that life forms changed with time and selection pressures were involved.
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon My friend, your Einstein also said, that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Have you been following the news? Science recently found out that this is false.
Just because Einstein said so makes what he said to be infallible. :~)
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline The report the CERN physicists wrote actually question their own results and are looking for help from the scientific community to see if someone else can help find if they made an error or if the results are truly correct. It is the way science works. Only religion and the Pope talk about infallibility. If the data is correct, all it means is the science will modify itself, as it always does, and include that certain types of neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light.
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon My friend, I was a fan of Isaac Asimov and have been reading Science Digest back in the 70's, I recall having read some particles travelling faster than the speed of light but only lives for a short micro second. I was surprise why the recent news of travelling faster than light was treated as new. :~)
Btw, i dont follow religion, religion cant save you but only a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ. The roman catholic church is a "pagan" religion. The pope is not a christian.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline if you recall reading about particles faster than the speed of light, your memory must be very blurry.
rushfan000 3 months ago
@rushfan000 I also recall coming up with noise cancellation in the mid 60's and is only recently that you got noise cancelling headphones. I also recall reading from my uncles magazine in the early 60's a 1950's airplane which is now your stealth airplane. You people think you are up to date with technology but what the government lets you know is old technology.. The cell phone was almost a decade already in my country before they introduce it here in america.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline saying that 'only a relationship with Jesus Christ can save you.'
is like saying, don't listen to what anyone else says about your imaginary friend, just try to have a personal relationship with him.
-
that way you don't get stuck defending undefendable points, you can blow anything off by saying, well thats not what i believe. While still feeling like you are maintaining a solid reason for belief.
panda0100 1 month ago
@panda0100 my friend to you, God is an imaginary being because you cant fellowship with Him. If you believe my God is an imaginary friend, wow, you have more faith than me because you admitedly believe that I have a God which you cant see or comprehend if He truly exist.
ThePrayerHotline 1 month ago
@ThePrayerHotline yes, i believe god exists, but ONLY in the minds of those who believe he exists.
this does not mean that he exists as YOU would define him.
nor does it mean that i "cant see or comprehend if He truly exist." because if he exists only as an imaginary thing. then i CAN comprehend such a being.
(btw fellowship is a Noun, so no, i can't "fellowhsip with him." but neither can you.)
panda0100 1 month ago
@panda0100 If God doesn't exist in your mind, then what are you talking about? Why talk about nothing in your mind? lol I believe you are just bored and have plenty of time to waste.
ThePrayerHotline 1 month ago
@ThePrayerHotline i wasn't talking about my mind, but yours. and because in my mind. god is just YOUR idea. while in your mind god is an actual being.
making him a figment of your imagination, and exsists ONLY as a figment of YOUR imagination.
since we were talking about the existance of god, it would be irrelevent to talk about where he does NOT exist (my mind) but where he does, (your mind)
panda0100 1 month ago
@panda0100 Dear friend, sorry I wasn't able to reply sooner. I have been having internet connection. Anyway, i hope the new year brings you new opportunities to realize. In response to what you said....I know I could talk to you but I never saw you with my own eyes, now does that mean you are just a figment of my imagination? :~)
Now if you've never seen me, but just see the evidence that I exist, I reply back to your comments, do you think im your imaginary friend?
ThePrayerHotline 1 month ago
@ThePrayerHotline the difference between you and I, and god is that there is independantly verifiable evidence that we exist.
i.e. if i ask my friend to read this. he can see the same exact evidence that i see.
panda0100 1 month ago
@ThePrayerHotline "Science recently found out that this is false." This is disputed and not replicated and probably false.
AakeTraak 3 months ago
#2 Sorry, I just can't wrap my head around the concept of Yahweh coming to Earth to sacrifice himself to himself so that he could forgive humans for not following the laws that he had given to Moses. A good majority of those laws are pretty atrocious, so I personally don't see any reason why I should be forgive for not following them.
oscargordon 3 months ago
I thought Noah put a pair (or five pair) of each kind of animal on the ark? Are you saying that he disobeyed Yahweh and refused to collect up T-Rex or velociraptors for the ark so they were all killed in the flood?
How is it humanly possible to stand in from of the camera and say these sorts of things with a straight face?
oscargordon 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the west, marriage is a civil union and only a civil union, not a religious one. The marriage certificate is a civil document. Unless you have gone through the legal, civil procedure you are not married by law and are not entitled to any benefits given to married couples.
All the Christian church does is give it 'God's blessing'. Same goes for any other religious wedding ceremony in the west.
DeeDemonwitch 3 months ago
Thx for he laugh, almost as good as Harry Potter on the fantasy departement.
Elidan19 3 months ago
Wait, what? You do know that we only started using farm animals in like the last 10,000 years right? That's not enough time for there to be fossils of humans and chickens next to each other.
deejayfore 3 months ago
BECAUSE THEY WERE HEAVIER!
PawelKolasa 3 months ago
Something cannot be "very unique".
It is either unique or it isn't.
preacherZer0 3 months ago
well said, fang!
madenew000 3 months ago in playlist More videos from VenomFangX
Question #2.
Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned
2 Corithians 5:21 "He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
Leviticus 17:11 11 For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
May I please suggest an answer to question # 1 ? When the flood came, the whole world went underwater in just a short span of time. It was a flash flood which meant erosion happened and since dinosaurs are heavier than man, its only natural that they will sink deeper in the mixture of mud and water. :~)
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
Comment removed
thealchemist1111 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline During the time that dinosaurs lived, animals came in all sizes, not just big ones like T-Rex and Allosaurus. Fossil beds from the Mesozoic era have animals of all different sizes in the same layer. The geologic record does not have animals separated by size.
You know it is quite easy to look these things up on the web don't you rather than just making stuff up with no basis in reality?
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon Very well my friend, please provide for the link to support your claim that dinosaurs of big and small are exactly on the same depth when they got swept up by the flood.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline This information isn't top secret you know. Are you saying that all of those paleontologists have been lying and covering up the "fact" that animals are sorted in the geologic record by size? Wiki Paleobiota and you can then see a list of a lot of fossil sites and from there see what animals have been found at each site, for instance Morrison Formation. Go to to a library and get information from real paleontologists instead of the lies from Creationist web sites.
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon The burden of proof is on you my friend, you should provide the links. :~) I wonder why you cant provide any link. hmmm.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline First may I inform you that I can not provide you with a link because YouTube will not allow anybody to provide links. What I did provide you with was the ability to go to your web browser and then go to Wikipedia and then type some words into Wikipedia's search so that you could see a list of animals found at a particular level and from there you could go to articles on each animal and find their size. But I bet that was too much work for you.
oscargordon 3 months ago
@oscargordon My friend, so wikipedia is your source of information? From what ive heard, its not very reliable.
Havent been there for a long time but sometime ago, they ask readers to contribute information if the readers feels they know more than the contents of the page.
ThePrayerHotline 3 months ago
@ThePrayerHotline What source would you find acceptable? I am sure Answers in Genesis will think that Wikipedia is not reliable since it contradicts every piece of crazy they lie about. Are you saying the Wikipedia article on the Morrison Formation is not accurate and those animals were not found there? If so, you are free to edit the Wiki page and say that it is all incorrect and enter all of the animals that were truly found there. Make sure they are all the same size while you are at it.
oscargordon 3 months ago
so before these fossils were known as dinosaurs these fossils were known as dragons........ok i agree but why is it impossible for you to grasp the concept humans have seen these fossils for 1000`s of years and conjured up stories of beasts and dragons.....are you suggesting no dinosaur bones were ever seen by man before 1800?
screwedupworld 4 months ago
For the evidence that is from the middle ages...are you suggesting that dragons were spotted or lived among people then?
luisbeta04 4 months ago
GOD!
plhearn 4 months ago
improper use of "whom" on question six............
StephenHardyMusic 4 months ago
@StephenHardyMusic he also used te phrase "very unique"
Pirate44444 3 months ago
@Pirate44444 lol true. That is true
StephenHardyMusic 3 months ago
keep it up Shawn !!!
sergeevspredator 4 months ago
4:26
that would be a coin depicting St. George slaying the dragon.
RomaZeal 4 months ago
Better yet, John Calvin was a Paul-ist.
brokeman327 4 months ago
Paul was a Calvinist.
brokeman327 4 months ago
You mention every continent on the planet for record of man living with dinosaur(dragon) . Out of interest if you do a follow up to this video at any stage could you include the continent often referred to as Australia (So Australia, PNG and the few other small islands) and Antarctica as I was not aware man lived on Antarctica till recently
DrapCNews 4 months ago
Very well answers, very simple, logical and congruential.
Kind regards.
fernandop1 4 months ago
Regarding the flood, could people simply have been better at temporarily escaping being buried (in the early days of the flood beginning) in mud and therefore fewer and less deep human fossils actually be formed?
staum607 4 months ago
VenomFangX you are awesome! Thanks for posting
iftheyonlynew 4 months ago in playlist More videos from VenomFangX
Dino bones are way bigger they would last in the earth longer
joydarling314 4 months ago
@joydarling314 dino bones are also heavier and would sink at a lower level than other bones
1Daphdong 3 months ago
13:13.
Read it, just-just read it! Sounds like a catchy rhythm or something. XD Made me laugh.
Does that make me sound like a moron? Perhaps.
8CaptainHowdy 4 months ago
never seen those dino proof pics before
TheMessanjah 4 months ago
I think it's very possible that humans co-existed with dinosaurs. Great video.
brantk81 4 months ago
verry good video
TheBigPicture1 4 months ago
Hey VFX :) I'd just like to point to a clear description of a dinosaur in Job 40:15 onwards. Many believe the so called "Behemoth" (Spelling altered from Greek translation) is actually a sauropod of some kind :)
MalakaiJ 4 months ago
Brother your answer to #2 was unbiblical and inconsistent. Jesus never took all the wrath of God upon Him, the cup was suffering of man--see that James and John said they would take the same cup.
Also if you believe all of God's wrath is gone, you've never read Revelation(I know you have, but it's clear, His wrath is not gone)---if you think His wrath is gone for all tho, then you're a universalist(I know you're not). Think about it brother. You're slipping into semi-Calvinism.
droptozro 5 months ago
Why am I thinking of Ernst Haeckel?
TzubakiZanjuro 5 months ago
@JustinIsAlwaysWright THAT was a pointless comment..lol
LordWhorfinX2 5 months ago
if so called dragons were such a big part of our lives back then (see pictures of slaying/riding supposive dinosours) then you would have to admnit it would be very likely that we would have found bones next to them. your first argument is that there were fewer people than dinos, then you flip around and say they were huge parts of our lives. if they were they would have been found in all sorts of accounts such as plato, socrates, etc...
epicseeds 5 months ago
@epicseeds
Okay, your logic is not consistent--if you kill the dinosaur/dragon--you're not going to sit next to it and die. Next, society would have killed most of them off due to fear, so there would be much fewer of them in time.
Next you hold up some other accounts of philosophers with which have no more justification to believe or dinos could have mostly been gone.
Last, dinos aren't smarter than humans--so during the flood, who's going to live longer and who'll be buried first/second?
droptozro 5 months ago
Why would you waste time on TommyfromtheBronx?! He's an uneducated and disrespectful punk.
LordWhorfinX2 5 months ago
@vegetaismyname1 never heard of such a person in the bible
angryaznman 5 months ago
@angryaznman shes a welsh saint not every sants story is in the Bible
vegetaismyname1 5 months ago
@vegetaismyname1 if its not in the bible its not biblical. duh.
angryaznman 5 months ago
@angryaznman I do applogise it is recorded in the Welsh Bible. Have you heard of Saint David he is a well known saint of Wales
vegetaismyname1 5 months ago
@vegetaismyname1 never heard of him. why is the welsh bible so different from the bible? i dont understand.
angryaznman 5 months ago
VFX, christians arent more likely to love their enemy any more than atheists or other theists would. that is the sin nature.
being a christian doesnt mean you sin less.
realize many european empires colonized on behalf of christianity. as is the crusades.
angryaznman 5 months ago
were those necklaces dated with the same methods that say the earth is millions of years old?
eddydeez 5 months ago in playlist More videos from VenomFangX
Moreover, 1+1=10 is more likely to be a correct answer (albeit only in the binary system).
SoundOfScilence 5 months ago
No, five is not a better answer than ten because they are both wrong. There are no half-measures in the purely logic-based world of mathematics. It's akin to people who get annoyed that the lottery numbers are one away from the ones on their ticket. It doesn't matter if you're one away or forty-eight away, it's still wrong.
SoundOfScilence 5 months ago
@tboud145 yet another pointless fail comment.
Hoafresh25 5 months ago
Yes, I am convinced that we kill them, because King David says that the killing bears and lions, but then you see, the remaining animals in the area, and there is no, because people as who colonized, was killing the animals that I consider that I thought were harmful, so even there in the islands, with these terrible lizards (lizard comfortable) because the places that were somehow less inhabited, preserved wildlife.
well that's what I think. I have not the truth is only an opinion.
bnejaforever 5 months ago
We do help people who are going to die. We give them too much morphine all the time. We know it will kill them. People do this all the time not to is kind of indefensibe sometimes.
Evaporator134a 5 months ago
"men can't give birth." Are you 100% sure about that? You might be in for a suprise. As for absolute morality proving christianity you might want to change that to is evidence for. Other cultures have had other ideas for an objective source of morality.
Evaporator134a 5 months ago
@ElProximo Your attempts to be a troll are totally transparent. Either that or you are too abysmally dense to understand what i was writing, quite clearly, by the way.
psappho111 5 months ago
@ElProximo Again, presuming to tell me what I "don't believe." And you can't even begin to see the crazy in that, can you?
Or, you're just a sick troll.
psappho111 5 months ago
@ElProximo Typical biblical fundamentalism, mis-applied to the Lady Bird Bachmann issue. He is both effeminate and a closeted, self-hating homosexual. there are many, many masculine homosexuals. Lady Bird is not one of them. Your inability to read my postings accurately indicates the worst method of exegetical "thought."
Your philosophically flawed arguments don't help your homophobic cause at all.
psappho111 5 months ago
If there were seven days of creation.....
How could god know how long a day was before created earth and the sun?
legofanatic12 5 months ago
@legofanatic12 i believe God had a plan of how long He wanted a day to be before creating a day (yom) just as a painter visualizes the finished product before he begins... next...
SenseiGrove 5 months ago
@legofanatic12 i believe God had a plan of how long He wanted a day to be before creating a day (yom) just as a painter visualizes the finished product before he begins... next...
SenseiGrove 5 months ago
I don't know why for sure, but my favorite quote was, "You don't want to be a Judas."
Lukeiru 5 months ago
Venom Fang X = Genius. It is true that some Christians hide away from discussions of faith, probably because they are scared that they don't have answers. However not all Christians do hide away. Christianity is supported by science. Aethiests hide away just as much.
ricky5538 5 months ago
I feel like there is so many hate comments you should hear this: Good video. I really enjoyed it and I learned something so keep em coming!
pntblnguitarists 5 months ago
1. There are no evidences of dragons in the 6th century as much as of any other "gods" or giant octopuses or mermaids or gnomes or phantoms or fairies.
2. If Jesus is God then He can't go to hell since He is outside Heaven or Hell or any place, even if He can manifest Himself inside any place.
3. Only a christian view allows an absolute standard of better? Why?
4. Revelation is useless, so no comments.
5. Ok
6. Ok, well Samson too, in a way. And in another way Jesus.
7. Quote the Bible, please.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
This response is directed at your #3
He wasn't saying that better can only be from a christian view, but he was saying that his answer relies upon accepting Christianity as true. To a muslim, the fully christian world would suck, or if you don't define "better" as we do, then what we think is better you would hate. Shawn kind of loopholed the question, but he basically said that of what he considers good, which most of us would, then yes, it would be substantially better.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy @ecokrazy "This response is directed at your #3" The primary message of Islam is to be kind to others, so in Islam a fundamental Christian world would be better than now. To a Jewish, Hindu, Buddhism, a similar reasoning can be done. Even to a atheist view. As long as no one goes into the killing in name of God thing.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
No, the primary message of the Koran is to be kind to others. The message of Islam (including the Hadith which is considered a holy writing with more authority than the koran because the later writings overrule the first) is to bring the entire world under submission to islam, and exterminate jews and christians. That message is repeated over and over in all the subsequent writings of Islam.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy That's a biased view of Islam, isn't it? I bet if you ask Muslims if the Hadith should be in the base for the legal laws of a country most of them would say no. As most of them don't even accept the same texts as the body of the Hadith. And I doubt any non-extremist Islamist and probably most extremists do not believe that the extermination of Jews and Christians is the base of Islam.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
No I'm not saying that due to pride in my own faith or hate of Islam. I'm saying that as someone who has studied it in a university setting and has had time to look at what it says. As for what the people choose to believe, you can liken it to Christians that support homosexuality, or a Hindu who doesn't believe in a pantheon. The religion itself makes a claim, and the followers sometimes choose to not listen. The later surpasses the former, and the later calls for murder
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2 I think that you would find that the majority of Muslims are called by their own religion and faith to make the Sunna law. Obviously you have no idea of how Muslims think.
AlYassou3Rabbi 5 months ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi I'll be sure to ask my Muslim friends instead of listen to the opinion of an obviously open and declared anti-Muslim.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2 You do that chum. My wife was Sunni Muslim when I met her
AlYassou3Rabbi 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
And this one to your #7
God outlines the purpose of marriage and whatnot starting Genesis 2:18–25. Leviticus 18:22 specifically speaks out against homosexual conduct. Mark 10:6, a New Testament or New Covenant writing again stipulates God's view on marriage. Romans 1:26–27 again speaks against homosexuality, noting there is a penalty. 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 is the verse Shawn cites where they will not inherent God's kingdom with 1 Timothy 1:9-10 testifying the same.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy "And this one to your #7" There is a penalty for homosexuality but not for same sex marriage. There is no direct quote forbidding same sex marriage.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
True, but that's because it was irrelevant at the time. If homosexuality was forbidden, obviously homosexual union was forbidden as well. It's just the next logical step. That said, Jesus loves all and forgives everyone of every sin without showing favoritism. It isn't at all about what we can do to justify ourselves or our ideas, but the fact that we HAVE sinned one way or another, and have been offered forgiveness. He didn't come to count your sins against you, but to forgive.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy Well, woman on woman action is not forbidden, so women can marry. And Jacob was married with two sisters (18:18). And there's Leviticus 11:7. And 20:13, we must kill them.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
In the OT its not, because the women knew it was abomination. One of the verses I quoted above however does say the women even did what was unsightly. As for Jacob, you're right, but that was through deception on the part of Laben, Rachel's father. Jacob did not sin. I think you misquoted 11:7 because that's dietary, and 20:13 reiterates homosexuality being condemned. The OT is not full of perfect people, just sinners like me who are forgiven in Jesus Christ. Mercy triumphs
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecok Those of you who condemn the sinner for sin after they have claimed the work of the cross boggle my mind. Christ died ONE TIME on the cross for all mens sins, past, present and future. Which sins are you eliminating from that act? Christ made a full end of the law at the cross. My bible says concerning homosexuality that they did that which was unseemly and brought upon them the recompense of their error
What does this mean?
It does not mean a loss of salvation but a loss of rewards
AlYassou3Rabbi 5 months ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
I never did, and I'm sorry you read that. The recompense for their sin wasn't a loss of salvation or a loss of reward, it was illness and death brought by the sin itself. Christians aren't compatible with sin and won't live in it. There are two places which clearly denote that the sexually immoral and the homosexuals won't inherent the kingdom of God, and the original greek speaks of persistent sin. God judges for sin, and it's big, but I'm not condemning a sinner. I myself sin
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy Where are you going to take me to to support your argument? Again show me which sins Christ did not die for ! You are making an effort to apply deeds and works to your salvation
Quote me 1Cor 5 where the Corinth man was sleeping with his own mother and as a result his flesh was given over to Satan for his destruction so that his spirit could be what? Oh yes, saved on the Day of Christ.
The Day of Christ is the "rapture"
Read 1Cor 3:15 and you will see believers suffer loss.
AlYassou3Rabbi 5 months ago
@ecokrazy What did Paul who is the Apostle to the Gentiles during the church age dispensation say concerning perpetual sin? Didnt he say something along the lines of, "that which I hate, I do"
God knew you would sin as a believer. That is why at the moment you believed in your heart the Lord Jesus, you experienced the circumcision made without hands of the PUTTING OFF THE SINS OF THE FLESH of the body
Christ paid for the sins that I have yet to commit. How do you deal with that statement?
AlYassou3Rabbi 5 months ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
That's identical do the scheme of thought I'm coming from, except I don't know how I feel about dispensationalism in the rapture sense, but that is neither here nor there. I'm really not sure what you read that I said that set you off, but whatever it was, you read it wrong. Everything you're saying to me is stuff I agree with, and really don't know where you're coming from.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy where is a quote for that? no, I haven't misquoted 11:7. I was just pointing out that this one is not so condemned in Christianity and wonder why.
20:13 actually talks about segregating them from the society. that's a bit harsh.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2 Romans 1:26-27 was the quote. The reason that we don't spend time on diet anymore is because in Acts...10 verse 9 Peter has a vision to kill unclean animals. This both signifies that God is reaching out the the non-Jews and God establishes all food to be eaten. The Law of the Old Testament is a school teacher that showed us what to do to be accepted of our own accord; no one ever fulfilled it except Jesus. It simply points us to Jesus as the forgiver of sins, because we need him.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy "The Law of the Old Testament is a school teacher that showed us what to do to be accepted of our own accord; no one ever fulfilled it except Jesus" You're saying that God changed His opinion about diet and, well, a lot of other stuff. So maybe he changed his opinion about homosexuality but the letter didn't made it to the Bible.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
No, I'm not saying that at all. God never changed his mind. His code and his statutes are eternal. That's a good thing, because we know that 10,000 years into the future he wont change and be a jerk. The purpose of the dietary laws was to "Be Holy, for I AM holy," that Israel would stand out as unique. Since salvation is no longer given through the law and it's sacrifices certain unique things for the Jews no longer apply. Homosexuality is not one of those.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
@ecokrazy "Since salvation is no longer given through the law and it's sacrifices certain unique things for the Jews no longer apply." That's a change.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
Shawn has a few videos that talk about Jesus throughout the old testament. It's apparent as a change but it was the design of God since before the foundation of the world. After Jesus was raised from the dead he met with two disciples and pointed himself out through the entire old testament. Not a change, just incredible grace and forgiveness.
ecokrazy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ecokrazy "Not a change, just incredible grace and forgiveness." Yes, Shawn posted one new recently. I fail to perceive how come forgiveness is not a change. Once you had to be a Jew and to not to eat pork. Then you could not be a Jew and could eat pork. I would say that is a big change, no matter if Jesus appears in the old testament or not.
edgarrsoares2 5 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
Salvation was NEVER through the law. And sacrifices only covered sin until Jesus came who actually took sin away once and for all. This is not a change this is a fulfillment of the law and the sacrifices.
dbendele 5 months ago
@dbendele "Salvation was NEVER through the law. " Then why do we need a law?
edgarrsoares2 4 months ago
@edgarrsoares2 The law is like a mirror that shows us our sin. Without the law we would not know what sin is. It reveals sin but does not save us from it. If we could be saved through the law Jesus would not needed to have been killed. Because Jesus paid for our sin, we obey God out of love, not as a means of our own salvation.
camilo101 4 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
(Gal 2:21NIV) "I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!" (Gal 3:21 ESV) "Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law." Rom 4:13 "It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith."
dbendele 5 months ago
@dbendele "It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world" Who wants to heir the world and for what?
edgarrsoares2 4 months ago
@edgarrsoares2
Hebrews 7:19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God. Hebrews 10:1 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming--not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship. Acts 13:39 Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses.
dbendele 5 months ago
@dbendele "Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses" Resuming, God made a pact, a law, useless and changed everything with Christ. Things changed then.
edgarrsoares2 4 months ago
As to the second question, Christ did pay the exact same punishment (nothing more, nothing less) for the sins of those for whom He died. The fact that Christ was holy and righteous did not lessen His punishment. Christ drank down the full cup of the wrath of God like it was water, taking only three hours. It may actually be that the punishment was all the more intense due to this haste. The amount of punishment, however, remained the same.
InSlaveryToChrist 5 months ago
Very good demonstration, clear and consist evidence that human coexist with big lizards, aka dinosaurs. Jesus paid for sin, and God delivered him on the 3rd day resurrection. He paid for our sin in full.
mylivingwater 5 months ago
I lived with a chicken once and I don't have any pictures. *Sigh*
EmBeesWeb 5 months ago
@venomfangx With the flood, the more intelligent animals sought higher ground, while the heavy, slow moving dinos got stuck in the mud and eventually were covered in it, thus fossilization. The reason why we don't find man in the fossil record is that we are floaters and bloaters. When the people died, they floated and rotted. When the waters assuaged and went down, they decomposed leaving the bones which in all likelihood are now dust.
andiroo42 5 months ago
How would you go about deciding which of your ideas about dinosaurs is correct (if any)?
lizzand 5 months ago
Great video Venom,
Keep it up.
7ees 5 months ago
No debating everybody, respect the video pleeeeeeaasseee
clixwerk 5 months ago
On the revelation, I'm not convinced the revelation deals with a worldly revelation as much as it does with a personal revelation each human has to deal with upon leaving the world, but I don't know. Could be about the issue of the day (e.g. Nero) or the future. A very intelligent, well designed presentation..
drystyx 5 months ago
One day nonbelievers will not have the ability to ignore Jesus. One day every knee will bow and every tongue will confess. Great job, VFX!
MrMonkipuzzle 5 months ago
@MrMonkipuzzle I had knee surgery and now I can barely bend my leg. How will I be able to do that?
downhome7500 5 months ago
@downhome7500 I'm pretty sure you'll find a way :)
MrMonkipuzzle 5 months ago
If Historians found this much evidence all around the world about anything else they would say it is a Fact that men lived with dinousours, but since so many are being brainwashed by evol. so they refuse to admit the truth proven by overwhelming evidence. If you want the truth read Gods liviving Word the Bible Creator of all Jesus.
coolvideo28 5 months ago
@coolvideo28 Please share with us some logical proof that the Christian god exists.
BlitzHitz 5 months ago
@BlitzHitz I dont need to God created everyone knowing God exists, but If you wish to learn more read Gods living word the Bible your Creator gave it to you a manual for humans on earth, if you ignore it your doomed.
coolvideo28 5 months ago
@coolvideo28 Yes you do. If you only go by faith, how do you know Allah isn't god? Faith is a belief in something without proof or evidence.
BlitzHitz 5 months ago
@BlitzHitz Re read my last comment until you understand it, then follow the edvice then when you at leat semi know the Bible we can talk. Hint Faith is in John.
coolvideo28 5 months ago
@coolvideo28 I was raised as a Christian. I've gone to a Christian school for 4 years. I've studied the Bible. Are you ready to talk now?
BlitzHitz 5 months ago
@BlitzHitz I take it were the oposite then, I was taught evol. my whole life and came to know the truth of Christ. What you want to talk about? If you want to talk about anything at any length, I sugest a message so we dont take over the comment section here.
coolvideo28 5 months ago
Finally, you said that the bible says "homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God". That's NOT what the bible says. It says "the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God". Paul later includes arsenokoites on his list of the wicked which is translated into homosexual offenders in modern english. But the word was undefined before english translations and used to refer to many things. Regardless, the very next verse says they CAN inherit the kingdom if they come to Jesus Christ. (1 Cor 6:11)
wesmartin91 5 months ago
@wesmartin91 God is the same yesterday, today, and FOREVER.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
@wesmartin91
Rev 21:7, 8 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers (sexually immoral), and sorcerers (those who practice divination, witchcraft, soothsaying, and drug users), and idolaters (those who worship other gods, including themselves), and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
@MessiahYeshuah I'm aware of that scripture thank you. Are you aware that it does NOT mention or reference homosexuals at all? And if you are aware of that, may I ask why you are posting it?
wesmartin91 5 months ago
@wesmartin91 Define sexually immoral, according to scripture.
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
Also, your answer on gay marriage was satisfactory from a religious standpoint, but I think the question is referring to secular law and asking about your view of the legalization of gay marraige. It's obviously something that the bible doesn't support. But would you as a Christian lobby against it? Gay marriage certainly IS possible in secular governments whether you personally recognize it or not. So the question should really be do you think gay marragie should be legal?
wesmartin91 5 months ago
I agreed with most of the points you made except for the last two (assisted suicide and gay marriage). I think you explained everything else fairly well from a biblical perspective, but your answer regarding assisted suicide was very weak. You say that suicide "is definetely something unbiblical to do" and "I think the bible would say that suicide is wrong". But those are not biblical answers. The bible in fact does NOT say suicide is wrong so what scriptures support this belief of yours?
wesmartin91 5 months ago
@foxkieran Indeed. You should block yourself! :)
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
Shawn, thank you for your videos, you always do a great job. May God keep blessing you.
girlmusicaddict 5 months ago
@VenonFangX Can you tell me where I can find or order the "Untold Secrets Of Planet Earth" Book (or books)? Thank you.
starsheild7 5 months ago
The Ica Stones is one the most compelling evidence man and dinosaurs co-existed.
vizion24 5 months ago
Killing it man
tomgreenlo 5 months ago
Sweet video man :D
But where's the venomfangx hardcore theme song haha :/
clixwerk 5 months ago
very thought provoking. I really enjoy your videos. Keep it up, brah XD
chobits713 5 months ago
Keep it up. Godspeed brother.
cryandsing 5 months ago
Venom you should lift weights more often. Your scrawny.
RaytownSoClassof2010 5 months ago
@RaytownSoClassof2010 You should lift your mind to a higher level. "For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist."
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
@RaytownSoClassof2010 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty.
MessiahYeshuah 5 months ago
@ElProximo Again, another dose of crazy. Or trollery.
psappho111 5 months ago
Such a great video! I've seen how much you have grown over the years......Awesome bro!
SETFREE21 5 months ago
@ElProximo Well, isn't this a ridiculous posting? First, you tell me what I "don't" think? Do you have any idea how crazy that statement makes you sound?
Points 1 & 2 are even crazier. I DO NOT support the Bachmann's in anything they do. They are pestilential pockmarks on humanity.
I'm not going to repeat what I said above, except that you obviously can't be included among those with a "well trained mind."
psappho111 5 months ago