First of all I don't need to follow main stream media or conspiracy theories to understand that fire cannot turn metal and concrete into dust. Grade 10 Science can easily dispute that. The building that was hit by the second plan falls first at free fall speed. The building the was struck first, falls second at free fall speed. Building 7 falls due to fire. All in the same day. No other buildings on the planet have ever fallen due to fire. Smells like bullshit to me.
First of all I don't need to follow main stream media or conspiracy theories to understand that fire cannot turn metal and concrete into dust. Grade 10 Science can easily disputes that. The building that was hit by the second plan falls first at free fall speed. The building the was struck first, falls second at free fall speed. Building 7 falls due to fire. All in the same day. No other buildings on the planet have ever fallen due to fire. Smells like bullshit to me.
hands up for all those who really believe 9/11 was about America being attacked by terrorists? *All the smart people in the room don't raise their hands* Ok now...hands up for those who believe 9/11 was about the US Goverment (namely the Bush administration) going to war and getting rich at the same time? *everyone raises their hand*
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”-Joseph Goebbels
golly gee. let's see. andy. uh, how does concrete get pulverized in mid air? i dunno wilbur. okay, okay, uh, let's see...andy, can fire melt steel...ya know, like, whatcha call it? molten, that's right...molten steel. like flowin' lava in Hawaii. i dunno Wilbur. go google it, or sumthin. ya know Andy, i heard they found some kinda fancy high tech explosive that wuz still live...i think thay call it nanothermite. they could still explode it years later...and thay did. whattya think a that?
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?
If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
Jim Meigs very first point is a good one. He says "...in fact, what we know about that day (9-11) comes from a huge array of sources. From eyewitnesses..." Why then Mr. Meigs, have the hundreds of eyewitness, survivors and first responders testimonies (That there were multiple explosions both under street level and throughout the World Trade Centers prior to collapse.) been completely absent from official accounts?
HAHAHAHA Then why don't the feds release the footage of the pentagon being struck? Why is it so easy to find scientists and architects that back the 911 "conspiracy" idea? Baaa baaa sheeple...
@givemericht "Why is it so easy to find scientists and architects that back the 911 conspiracy idea" ... Are you serious? Only a few hundred have come out to support it, out of the million or so of architects and scientists around the world, probably even more than that. Hmm so easy to find them? yeah right. You conspiracy nuts really need get out of the house sometimes. Believing these conspiracies are nothing to be proud of.... which is why most people don't take truthers seriously.
@we3575 It is easy, dipshit, all you need is an internet connection and a brain. You obviously have an internet connection, so you're half way there!
I don't know why you call me a conspiracy nut, I don't believe most conspiracies. I believe in the laws of physics, though, things falling through the path of least resistance and such INSANE notions like that.
All you guys are nuts... no planes, missiles, controlled demo?! haha. that's why no one takes you guys seriously. That's why your a nut case and that's why the 9/11 truth movement has been crumbling these days. 9/11 conspiracies are laced with lies and mis-information. Quotes are taken out of context and entire sentances are left out. Do us a favor and stop taking gullible people and making them believe these theories. That's how these theories get passed on.
@we3575 I believe that planes struck the WTC, I am unconvinced as to what struck the Pentagon and what went down in Shanksville, though I am willing to accept that they were planes. The FBI could easily release footage to show what hit the fistagon but for some reason unknown to me, they don't. My main beef is with the towers, that's the part I don't like. You say gullible but it seems you are willing to believe that the towers defied the laws of physics because your goverment says so.
@givemericht Yeah, you truthers take gullible, low IQ people and convince them on these theories. "My friend said this is what happened, so it's got to be true" ... and it's bullshit you truthers deny every single bit of that. You take people who have no knowledge of the attacks and brainwash into believing this bullshit. And then when someone who believes in the official theory you just deny that their even citizens, you claim their paid agents of the government! Haha, sorry saps you guys are.
@we3575 Actually, I learned most of my physics in school and from documentaries featuring people with all the right credentials. I don't accuse anyone of being paid agents of the government if they're not police, army or civil servants. I don't brainwash anyone, their minds are their own, though I think physics should be applied to all instances like this or you might be misled and start living your life in fear. And conspiracy or not, it was the vehicle for lots and lots of war.
So, you believe that several small fires were able to destroy, simultaneously, all of WTC7's 82 columns so that there would be a symmetrical collapse that for 2.5 seconds fell @ freefall acceleration?
WOW!!
Maybe you should lend your expertise to the "world's best engineers" @ the NIST who, since they COULDN'T figure out how freefall was possible (they had earlier claimed that freefall was NOT possible given a fire induced collapse) they labled their report "UNSCIENTIFIC."
@1234bmonty Why do you nuts need to argue your evidence? I get you truthers are in denial about the US being attacked but you guys need to understand it happened. The US is an vulnerable is as any country. And that's exactly what truthers are, in denial. You guys will deny it all day long but it's the truth. I'd recomend a good therapist... maybe a girlfriend. Stop with the keyboard wars on Youtube,. Oh and to get a laugh out of you gullible little turds... I'm a mossad agent. Fact or lie? haha!
@we3575 So, you believe that several small fires were able to destroy, simultaneously, all of WTC7's 82 columns so that there would be a symmetrical collapse that for 2.5 seconds fell @ freefall acceleration?
WOW!!
Maybe you should lend your expertise to the "world's best engineers" @ the NIST who, since they COULDN'T figure out how freefall was possible (they had earlier claimed that freefall was NOT possible given a fire induced collapse) they labled their report "UNSCIENTIFIC."
@givemericht The real threat are the jesuits sheeple. The jesuit have always instigated the american citizens to hate america.
1. The civil war. The south even tough were the evil ones for having slaves look themselfs as protestants heros that wanted to save the south from the North and europe
2. The Nazi and hitler were seens as Heros and jewish bankers as devils
3. Communists everywhere in the world Communist were seen as the good ones
@givemericht The real threat are the jesuits sheeple. The jesuit have always instigated the american citizens to hate america.
1. The civil war. The south even tough were the evil ones for having slaves look themselfs as protestants heros that wanted to save the south from the North and europe
2. The Nazi and hitler were seens as Heros and jewish bankers as devils
3. Communists everywhere in the world Communist were seen as the good ones
The report was not peer reviewed in any way shape or form it is published for $800.00 to look like it was peer reviewed. tell me where does the Jones report directly link their contaminated samples with no chain of handling to WTC 1 or 2
If you are confused on this one just watch debunking 9/11 debunking. It lays it out pretty well if you have an hour and a half. The research was all done by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth
This cock sucker from Nat. Geo. is an ignorant fuckhead that has been bought and paid for. I'm never wrong about these things....not once.!!!!! 9/11 was an inside job and Bush will someday get whats coming to him....this I promise!!!!!!
In April of 2009 a peer-reviewed paper published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal reported the finding of unignited nano-engineered thermitic materials in multiple samples of World Trade Center dust. The discovery of these materials, is important. Why won't NIST release their data regarding the reports they submitted on the collapse of buildings 1, 2 and 7.
Well he's a real go getter. He left no stone untouched. Man he is so amazing. If he thinks the REALIST are uninformed that must really make his job suck. To have to spend ALL that time debunking something you think is one big joke about a bunch of fairy tales and their oh so funny jokes. I think I'll believe NYC firefighters.
Did you learn about the Reichstag in school? Bet you did. Did you learn values and how to run the government, how it is supposed to be run or how it is run? Bet you di
@2gtrmike Thank you. In April of 2009 a peer-reviewed paper published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal reported the finding of unignited nano-engineered thermitic materials in multiple samples of World Trade Center dust. The discovery of these materials, is just some scientific mumbo jumbo probably. Thank god for peer review.
Another investigation of the anthrax attacks is appropriate. Of course the story is that some insane catholic guys single handedly produced weaponized anthrax and then wrote messages in letters as if he were a jihadist (no motive). Tom Daschle disagrees with this story of course saying that others MUST have been involved. And he was an intended victim of the attack. Vote up if you think the anthrax attacks should be investigated along with 9/11. Copy paste this to other videos.
1) In WTC rubble, chunks of concrete and metal fused together were found (aka "meteorite"). This shows conclusively that metal was melted. Conventional fires do not burn hot enough to melt steel.
2) Nano thermite found in the dust from WTC's; findings published in peer reviewed scientific journal (google scholar search: thermitic materials 9/11)
3) In the governments own investigation of the anthrax attacks, the primary suspect worked for the US.
Miegs is the definition of a shill. He has absolutely no scientific background, in-fact he is a Philosophy major from Dartmouth. Previous jobs include being the senior editor of Entertainment Weekly.
Popular Mechanics is far from being a scientific journal or reference, their biggest issue is "What to buy daddy for Christmas"
I tend to side with the more than 1300 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Research WTC7 and start connecting the dots people, everything points to INSIDE JOB!
Do you mean you agree with the NIST whose report has been repeatedly shown to have holes? Or you agree with the 155,336,477 other sheep who have done no research for themselves and go along with the official story because they somehow feel the people who put it together could do no wrong.
@HKmaroLS1 Nist and Commission report are self acclaimed as the deliverers of the "official story". don't give them so much authoritative power over the situation. i've never even read those books/reports and i don't need to in order to have a more precise idea of what happend and why than people who poke around searching for something that affirms what the interesting conspiracy youtube video shows. so i've heard NIst's report isn't very good and i believe it, it doesn't change what happened.
The fact is NIST published bogus reports regarding WTC. There is more then enough evidence for further independent investigation, I'll go ahead and save you the trouble: Buildings don't "collapse" through the path of greatest resistance. In the case of WTC7, the entire structure fell at free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds. This means for that instance in time, there was little to no structural resistance in ANY of the columns on ~8 floors. Fire is not that precise.
@HKmaroLS1 "buildings don't collapse through the path of greatest resistance" this statement is said a lot and it seems as though it would make sense but it is simply wrong-physics is often counter-intuitive. with a skyscraper, straight down is the only path it can take, absolutely the buildings fell through the path of least resistance just as they should have, it couldn't have happened any other way, there isn't enough energy 2 tip it over like a beer. forget the fire and freefall, distracting
Tell me how WTC 7 is a steel building that feel at free fall speed from fire, please. I am one of those crazy nutjobs 9/11 truthseekers that served for my country and have questions...
9/11 Truthers sometimes claim that there would not have been enough fire and heat from the fuel of the passenger planes. Type on YouTube "plane crash" you will see at least 10 videos of Airshow or other random, much smaller, planes crash into the ground. See how much fire there is. on 9/11 it was huge passenger planes full of fuel to fly across long distance.
oh right, so can you explain, what type of evidence could there be that could prove, that there was no "inside job" ? I mean is there any evidence you may be willing to accept?
@StopFear. are you seriously asking us to prove it wasn't an inside job? no thanks, there is no need. do we owe it to the people who have done themselves a diservice by buying into 9/11 Truth theory? is there really anything else that can be said that would make truthers drop their weapons and say "ohp, guess we were wrong. sorry about that!" not gonna happen. the truthers curl up into their dark corners while the rest of us move forward with this planet. 9/11 truth is as dead as that crab meat
I do not necessarily believe the official story, but if the official report isn't true doesn't follow that it was an inside job, and an "inside job" means a different , wide spectra of things to everyone. Some claim the planes were rockets, some say it was holograms, some say it was a death ray from space. Next guy will say it was an invisible Godzilla monster that was visible from only his angle of view. Either way, whichever the theory I am not seeing the proof you claim
It's pretty obvious that there is more then the 'official' reports say to 9/11 just by watching the live new broadcasts from that morning. You'd have to believe that all the newscasters, fireman, police and bystanders were all just lying that morning on live television.
this are not "theories" you fucking idiot... and people seeking the TRUTH are not talking about "conspiracy" but about the NWO. and the 9/11 is just the begining of it.
9/11 truthers don't care about the lives lost that day. All of the brave firemen who went in knowing they will die that day. They don't care at all. The are just so insecure and just say all of these conspiracies that way they can feel "important"
They say the building fell due to explosions, but most people don't know what an explosion actually is. Micheal Bay films don't count as credible sources.
Well, call me a government spy and call me an ignorant a-hole all you want, but it wont affect me
@zume2600 Actually I wasn't upset, I was just doing what he told everyone to do. His exact words were "Well, call me a government spy and call me an ignorant a-hole all you want". So I did.
the question that still haunts me continuously in my sleep is that, if the 9/11 was not a ramification of a conspiracy, then why does this counterargument theory (against 9/11 truth) emerge only after a decade of the incidence? it took the the 9/11 truth less than a decade to come up with a number of reasonable arguments regarding this matter; if Washington thinks that the truth is that it was a deliberate attack made by an external party then,why is it so hard for them to to convey it?
@atonglenon It emerged only a year or so after 9.11 not a decade later.. And it took time because it was backed by science and data not just empty answers..
Yep, conspiracy theorists number one source of "facts" is other conspiracy theorists. They do not provide sources, or real fact, they use fake names, fake facts, etc. etc. Don't tell that to the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, though, they'll think you're part of the conspiracy :(
The conspiracies have all been debunked, so the "truthers" have gone farther and farther with their conspiracies, claiming that there's secret agencies, huge conspiracies, holograms, aliens, orbs, all sortsa shit that makes their nuttiness seem validated. Conspiracy theorists are children that need to be guided out of their suicidal ignorance. That or prescribe some anti-psychosis medicine. If a conspiracy theorist says the sky is orange, you're never going to change their "mind."
STupid arguement guys. It was a controlled demolition, PERIOD. Good God, how much more proof do you need?
The damned thing fell perfectly symmetrically, at free-fall speed. THAT, by itself IS ENOUGH to prove CD. Symmetrical collapse at free fall speed is not possible, NOT POSSIBLE without explosives. Helllooooooooooooooo!!!
You are one of those people who could have Osama about to shoot you in the head, and he'd tell you,,"Just between me and you, I planned this thing by myself.,your goverment wasnt involved". You still wouldnt believe him a few seconds before he was to shoot you....Damn your dumb...all your lame theories are rejected by 99% of all Americans...damn....all you dumb theories have been debunked for 5 years already...drop this crap and enroll in college already...this cant be your excuse forever
two planes dissappeard into thin air on 9/11 come on lets get real now...I may be some dumb but i aint plum dumb...shanksville p.a mayor stated and I got the video to prove this that when he arrived at the crash site there was and i repeat..there was no plane nothing but a hole..so no bodies no plane just a hole so u take that were you take it...
Stevan Jones has presented a great deal on credible evidence which supports the claims that the WTC buildings fell as a result of Controlled Demoliion... Anyway, are you blind? Do you know what an explosion is?
don't believe a word this guy on this video is saying , he sed they found body n blackboxs from the plane, yes n im white with black skin!!! if this is true then theres nothing 2 hide so why did the FBI take all the footage that show the crash n hide it from the people , y can't they show us n let us see the crash 4 ourselves , because it was not a plane, this man is probably a spy 4 the government u fucking lying piece of shit/ 9/11 was a inside job
@southsidewarrior22 With a reasoned and articulate argument like that, who could possibly reach any other conclusion? And asserting that this guy is a government spy? A touch of brilliance. It certainly doesn't show the tendency of truthers to assert huge claims without any evidence whatsoever.
Not personal. It's a pointed criticism of the Truth Movement who seems to think that anyone who disagrees with them (on the basis of shite evidence offered) is a government spy.
I don't say I buy the official story. I say evidence for controlled demolition is nil. The buildings did not fall at freefall speed, there is no evidence of thermite, there is no evidence of any kind of plot by gov't officials to bring it down (much less that they actually did), and of the hundreds of people that must have been involved in this conspiracy, not one has come forward. There is no reason to believe that the government planned 9/11. They are criminally negligent for it, however.
@andyissemicool, The problem is that some people don't base their conclusion upon evidence, but instead base them upon the hypothesis they had going in.
When I get shills who constantly deny that explosive nanothermite can be painted on, despite clear evidence that it can:
watch?v=BiEneFVJoXc
I have to be very suspicious of these people, their motives, and who they are. Especially after reading Cass Sunstein's paper...
I don't deny that nanothermite COULD have been placed in the towers, there is just no evidence for it. The only alleged evidence that I've found is from Steven Jones, and his chemical signatures do not contain all the chemicals necessary for thermate.
All that is necessary for an Aluminothermic reaction is powdered Aluminum and Rust. Nanothermite contains these ingredients in nanopowder form, and in perfect stochiometric mixture.
There is absolutely no getting around this fact.
This is what was found in the WTC Dust.
It shows that whoever planned this went through incredible lengths not to get caught.
Unfortunately for them, the DID get caught. They will now have to pay for their crimes.
So you're saying the only way that aluminum and rust could have been found at WTC is because of thermate? I don't think so.
I am not a scientist, but I have read that aluminum oxide and barium nitrate are byproducts of a thermate reaction, but I do not know of a single piece of evidence that states that these have been found at the WTC site.
How much thermate do you think was necessary to take down the buildings and where do you think it was all placed?
The key word is "Stochiometric"... That means something chemically. It means that the ingredients were mixed in perfect amounts for a reaction to proceed.
Also the particulate size is another factor, you'll be hard pressed to explain with normal building materials...
How much FIRE do you believe was necessary to cause the buildings to collapse, then ask yourself how much thermite would be needed...
More than a couple tons of thermate would be needed to burn the columns sufficiently to destroy the towers. The whole stoichiometric equation I made up during lab time today takes up too much space. Basically, it takes approximately 4.8 lbs to burn a small hole in a aluminum engine block. Extrapolate that out to burning through a single column at one point on one floor. Then multiply that by how many structure points would need to be compromised. It comes out to a couple tons of thermate.
Oh yeah,,they tested Thermite when he first made these claims and guess what...it couldnt cut through a 1 inch steel pipe......so then awhile later he came back saying it was now "Superthermite".. But then he started saying "Nano thermite...he keeps making this stuff up...Nano thermite is not something anyone has ever seen , there is no info out on it, so it makes the perfect thing to blame for the collapse..Because noone can say what it can do because noone knows..LOL.hes the worst scammer.
@NanoThermite911 You're disregarding all the refutations about thermite being found, idiot. You seem to disregard most things that don't fit your narrow-minded tunnel-vision view of the world. Isn't it ironic that non-conspiracy theorists are more open minded that conspiracy theorists are? I think so. You obviously don't think at all. Quit insulting history and the people who died and the people who fight to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Fucking dipshit baby.
His dust sample is no good...It was recovered from some womens apartment 1 month after 9/11. She had red paint in the room=the red "thermite chips" he found...that is a contaminated sample and no pro Lab in the world would accept such evidence..but this loser doesnt care...Also it was NEGATIVE FOR THERMITE.. It lacked the chemicals from the Combustion of thermite...All scientist agree it is negative...it only contains normal elements from the building....Please do your own reaserch, dont trust
I believe what the govt tells me to believe: a few Bad Guys in Caves Who Hate US for Our Freedom crashed 2 planes at WTC and made 3 highly engineered skyscrapers dissolve into dust in seconds; the same BGs crashed 2 more planes leaving almost no debris; the Pentagon cameras recorded nothing worth mentioning; NORAD was very busy at the time and missed all this; the WTC steel was recycled immediately to aid the rescue effort; we couldn't stop the attacks but we knew within minutes who did it.
I can also believe a plane hiting the Pentagon at that speed would be destroyed so badly u couldn't find wreckage. I just have a hard time believing an inexperienced pilot could fly that fast, that low, dodging trees and powerlines, could put that plane into the Pentagon perfectly on the first try.
Alot of air force pilots flying highly maneuverable designed craft have trouble flying that low to the ground in planes meant for that. This was a plane that was not meant for that, lol.
Jet fuel may get hot off to burn steel. But the jet fuel was that large fire ball you seen twice outside the towers when the planes hit. All the jet fuel burnt up on impact. What else would have caused those fire balls? See he doesn't tell u that part.
They also don't consider how much jet fuel it would take to melt all that steel. Those buildings were huge. How much jet fuel would it have taken to do that? More than was on that plane.
But don't you think it's kind of odd that the whole building would come down in the form of pulverized concrete? Which is what the dust cloud's were.
I could see steel melting and doing that, but not smashing the supporting floors underneith and taking out the remaining steel columns.
I could see the top part of the building falling into the bottom floors, which they would then support. Not completely collapsing into pulverized dust in a matter of seconds.
This would be more plausible if the planes would have hit the lower half. More weight coming down. But the didn't. They hit the upper half. If the upper steel columns were weakened by jet fuel, the columns half way down and to the bottom weren't. So what caused them to give away? Once again, the same thing on BOTH buildings?
Then look at how WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane and collapsed the SAME way.
If explosives/thermite were set in the tower's and the column's cut, then it was very for them to do.
Marvin Bush (George's Brother) was the one in charge of security for the WTC complex. He quit Sept. 10.
Two weeks before 9/11 there was a security lockdown. So, if Marvin was in charge of security, his men could have been preparing and bringing in materials for weeks and no one would have known.
@kjcarpenter1221 Ok, so, your telling me because the steel was weakened on the "Top" floors, it crushed and pulverized everything underneith within 10 seconds.
The reason CT's zero in on little details that are thought to be anomalous is because those "little details" are not explained and ignored by the Gov't.
Example: Plane hit the pentagon. Ok all the gov't has to do to prove this is show more video footage, but instead they show a few small frames from ONE camera. The Pentagon has camera's all over the place aimed at that location. If u think that's the only footage they have, then I have Jesus hiding out in my bathroom.
Ok this guy from PM says that CT's get there info from outside org's. So does the gov't. Are we to really believe IF the gov't did this, they WOULD come out and admit it? Are we to believe they would use the Mainstream Media (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) to report the truth? When these news stations are owned by the corps who would have benefited from this tragedy? Fox is republican, CNN is democrat. Would they really report this to cause the people to get angry?
Today NORAD conducts a lot of anti drug smuggling operations and does track planes in the US, but only if the planes entter the US. Their resources and surveillance are still projected out of and NOT into the US
To the "war games" theory, yes, there were military excercises taking place on 9/11 in response to a long range bombing excercise that Russia had conducted. The games that took place were focused outward, not into the US. And for those who can't believe NORAD would have gaps in its coverage, why don't you jackasses research the reason NORAD was created. To give early warning of a Soviet air or nuclear attack.
i love how this schmuck who's talking doesnt mention the war games taking place that day and just says "there were 14 planes ready to fly" ... conspiracy theorists might quote other conspiracy theorists, but i dont find this guy all that credible either. He bashes conspiracy theorists for "focusing on a few anomolies," but its just as bad when he himself doesnt mention important information at all, like the war games...sry, but this vid doesnt suppress my belief in conspiracy theories about 911
Well its a fact that war games were taking place during 911.
Now you know damn well that this country knew that something was going to happen during this day. My question is why did they plan war games on the same day?
There is a word called "coincidense", is it truly NOT possible for these two events to have accidently been planned for the same day? Do you REALLY think that AMERICAN fighter pilots would be ok with participating with this? You DO OF COURSE know they have psychological exams regularly to make sure they are stable individuals in order to be at the controls of armaments that can cause mass destruction?
And the war games are done several times a year.. in all of the Armed Forces branches.. In order to act appropriately in such an event that the US is attacked.. And not run around saying "what do I do? What do I do!!?" But the MAIN ISSUE is we were not prepared for an attack within the US.. Did you realize that?
U.S. was tipped off that something was going to happen on this day. This is a proven fact even though you won't ever see it on the idiot box at home.
They knew and still did nothing, and not only that but they plan war games on the same day? Honestly there is a mountain of new evidence that has come to the surface since that day PROVING that there is something else to the official story of 911. Just because Fox News hasn't reported on it doesn't make it untrue.
keep sleeping guys, while the real patriots is fighting the nwo and the criminals. This video is baseless, my ear hurts whenever somebody tries to debunk the real facts.
What "real facts"??? Parts of quotes? Videos cropped? Outlandish conjecture? What planet are you from? The ONLY way these "truth movement" THEORIES can hold water, is if YOUR too blind to believe what your eyes are seeing.. You literally HAVE to WANT it to be true.. How come over 200+ videos were being filmed by the general public, NOT ONE OF THEM supports you.. There are your facts!
By your logic, we must have also caused World War 2 to happen, since we benefited SO greatly from the war itself. We also had another economic boon due to the reconstruction of Europe. That must be why we destroyed so many buildings, so that Europe would love us so much when we rebuilt them and opened up European economy to American goods.
By that logic, America must have caused WW2 in order to eventually profit from it. Redictulous
no, America looked back at WW2 and realized that after the war, we made a ton of money. and they thought, "maybe if we start WW3, once its over, the same thing will happen!"
and by YOUR logic, you would say that if something works once, you would never ever ever do it again. and i assume you also believe that there has never been a corrupt government in the history of the world.
ever heard of insurance fraud? think of it as that, but on a massive scale
Adkinsjr... No need to argue with complete morons. We know what happened, and what happened does not come from fake stories of information thought up by conspiranuts. To the owner of this truthfull video of common sense and facts, keep up the great work.
The planes and who was on and what got switched is step 4 , 5 we have alotta other questions to clear up before we get to that part .. we must first bring forth the perps .. and for them to be running the extact terror scene attacks and in the drills the same day is just to throw the good people in the positions off .. just like 7/7 they had the extact same terror drills ont hat day and again the terror drills turned out to be reality ? do you know the odds of that? honestly
Can you atleast agree with me we dont need to hire anymore demolition people ? we just need to set a few fires in the building and watch it collpase just like building 7 right? =p funny how so many of the government offices with lots of documents were in that building and just happened to get erased .. tell me why they would take off most of the steel to be recycled right after 9/11? isnt this a crime scene? why are we destroying evidence?
It wasn't just the fire that caused the collapse. The impact of the plane caused severe structural damage and either wiped out or serverly damaged the majority of the verticle columns. The raging inferno than slowly weakend what was left of the support columns until it the entire structure gave way.
The plane caused the serve strucural damage? to make both buildings fall identically in the same way? at near free fall speed? even though the engineers of the towers said it was designed to take mulitiple Impacts for air planes..b-25 crashed into the empire state building in 1945 ...did absoltey nothing to the building expcet cause a fire which weakened nothing ....how is this so hard ..thoose are steel structure buildings with masive cores .. and you think fire brought it down?
Don't you realize how many people and passangers were on those planes? Don't you think that American airlines would notice if they actually weren't missing any pilots or airplanes? The conspiracy theories just don't make any sense. Especially in the case of flight 77 where the theorist there was no plane at all! WTF? Then were the hell is flight 77, the pilots, the crew and the passengers?
Dont worry about the planes and who was on it and what kinda planes..we establish that after we get past step 1 .. which is the government lied about what happened that day and it was delibreate and we need to find out who was giving orders and who messed up that day.. do you realize how many people should've been fired for letting the american people down? yet i see theese fuckers get promoted on a job well done? lol i know the trillion dollar defence system didnt fail from 4 hijackers :p sry
Oh one more thing .... Do you realize we dont have to hire expensive demolition teams any more??? i mean look at builiding 7 .. it seems all you have to do is set a few fires and watch it perfectly fall into its footsteps LMFO ....i really cant believe its that hard to see its controlled demolition .. when people cant see the obvious with there own eyes .. im afraid this world is fucked
lol i still cant over the fact you watched 3 demolition videos and you couldnt see the extact same thing on 9/11 loool .. do you know what it takes for a building to fall close to the free fall speed? demolitions ! .. if there was resistance as the building fell it would take alot longer..and they've tried to recreate how it fell in models and cant get the same results
I'll tell you why 9/11 can never be discovered its inside job. Because they we go back to kennedy ,, go back to the moon landing .. go back to pearl harbour..go back to vietnam ..go back to the world wars .. were they all fabricated all along? and the people taken for a ride? if all theese things get exposed what is america? a country proud of lies? the whole history of america is tainted my friend ..and thats a box many refuse to open because it would devistate millions of good people
Agreed. Same thing applies for my country though but I accept that the reason we got so powerful and built an empire was through greed and violence. Every war the US has entered has had an alternate motive, it wasn't just about "stopping the bad guys." World Wars 1 and 2 were financial, Vietnam was fear of communism/spread of democracy, Iraq for oil control etc There's been so many events to create scapegoats, but people refuse to believe it.
yea they refuse to believe it because they have the best form of mind control.. and thats propeganda from media ,,remember repititon is the best form of mind control....say a lie long enough eventually they'll believe it =:D subscribe to learn more !
Ask you self why a government would do such a thing to its own people? perhaps it was to get support to go to war and secure oil lines? when that was fading they had to make up weapons of mass destruction...like really how do you fuck up that intelligence and be so wrong..somebody should be fire because our tax payer dollars obviosly are ran by a bunch of morans who confused a country for having weapons...thats either a really big fuck up or was a lie to begin with
Oh and i've seen Owens videos...unlike you i check both sides of the story before making up my mind ... his videos are weak and its the same response as popular mechanics .. but when you try and debate popular mechanics they hide there faces...same with other people .. they cant debate this issue because they know they cant win ..that day 3 buildings broke the laws of pysics you dont think thats a little weird.. you dont think its weird the building engineers said it could take mulitiple planes?
is everybody under me really saying 9/11 wasnt an inside job? because if you are then im sorry pal.. i wish i could do something for ya..the obvious isnt enough .. this videos just a joke right? someones pulling my strings? haha funny guys!
Its funny how when a conspiracy is debunked, the morons just make-up some other stupid conspiracy. Anything to hate the government, what a bunch of idiots.
9/11 was NOT a conspiracy! Get your narrow-minded brains together!
where has your government brought you? lost liberties? perhaps millions of lost job? or maybe the millions of homes robbed from there rightful owners? or perhaps you speak of the wars they brought? or maybe the flouride they have in our water? or perhaps you mean the untested gentically modified foods .. or maybe your talking about taking the natural medicines out so they can replace it with there drugs.. or just maybe you could be talking about destroying the consitution .. boo government
That's not the point, the point is that this was NOT a conspiracy. Bush could raise taxes by $100,000,000.00 per person and I would still know that 9/11 was not a conspiracy.
Where's Obama going to lead us? The same direction Jimmy Carter did; straight down the crapper!
Lol thats not the point? obama is on the same pay roll as bush.. along with mccain and hilary .. you dont seem to notice how bad the government screws you everyday .. then your gonna trust them to tell you what happened on 9/11? how many days did it take for the list of the 19 hijackers to come out? pretty fast investigation wouldnt you say so ? yet we couldnt find one weapon of mass destruction in iraq.. our intelligence isnt very intelligent :)
all you have to do is youtube controlled demolitoions...and see what a professional job looks like...now play the 9/11 videos beside it .. honestly if you really cant see the similiarities then you just choose to close your eyes .. you can say planes hit but then why would building 7 fall the extact same way? the smoking gun is right there .. how is this so difficult for everybody to understand/? just with your own eyes loooooooook
I did, and controlled demolitions make an extremely loud BANG! None of the 9/11 videos made any loud BANG sound, they all just made crumbling sounds. Also, no evidence was found of a controlled demolition.
lol the building disintergrated into thin air .. there was melted steel at the bottoem burning up evidence.. if it was a inside job why would they find evidence against them self??? can you listien to your self and how rational you are ? really your not .. and how about you tube 9/11 eyewitniess and lets ask them if they heard any explosions.. perhaps the fire man who demonstrated boom booom boom was high on something right?
The building did not disintegrate into thin air. And no, there was no melted steel. Steel cannot melt unless its at 2750 degrees F. Steel, however loses 50% of its strength at around 1100.
And (since you think the Government is so evil) if it truley was a conspiracy, then why didn't those 9/11 conspirators just 'dissapear'?
And I read all the quotes, and none of them said they heard a demolition. Of course they'll be explosions (a/c units, etc.). All quotes are distorted by 9/11 'truthers
lmfo no melted steel? you wanan bet pal? you wanna see satilite images of the red hot melted steel core of the disaster?? why would you think demolition if your standing there ..with all the panic goign on .. you really think its a terrorist attack..its only after when you sit down compare it with other demolitions you actually see hey ! thers a fucking problem here .. buildings dont ever fall like that from fire.. and the jet fuel you say? well that burnt off initial explosion..sooooooo
How can there be melted steel if the fires of the jet fuel only made it to 1,800 degrees? Once again, I watched three demolitions and I watched four different 9/11 videos. Not a demolition.
And there wasn't any construction worker (who had backgrounds in controlled demolition) who said it was a demolition.
By the way, work on your spelling, you need it bad.
sorry for my spelling...second thermite melts steel .. if termite was used for the demolition wouldnt that explain the molton pools of steel that was recorded by satilite imagary ..? you watched demolition videos put them together and you didnt see a demolition? lol well if your that blind to the obvious you need some help .. and i can show you controlled demotilition workers who do say it was a demolition .. you dont reserach that far did you?? do i have to do all the homework
the govt lied about pearl harbour
the govt lied about roswell, the UFO crash
teh govt lied about vietnam
the govt lied about the war on drugs
the govt lied about weapons of mass destruction in iraq
WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT TO KNOW
lowaces 2 months ago
@lowaces Bro, slippery slope arguments really do not get you anywhere in life, so don't do it!
BaldurdashWoW 3 weeks ago
U suck
rogeriosantos77 3 months ago
First of all I don't need to follow main stream media or conspiracy theories to understand that fire cannot turn metal and concrete into dust. Grade 10 Science can easily dispute that. The building that was hit by the second plan falls first at free fall speed. The building the was struck first, falls second at free fall speed. Building 7 falls due to fire. All in the same day. No other buildings on the planet have ever fallen due to fire. Smells like bullshit to me.
1234bmonty 4 months ago
First of all I don't need to follow main stream media or conspiracy theories to understand that fire cannot turn metal and concrete into dust. Grade 10 Science can easily disputes that. The building that was hit by the second plan falls first at free fall speed. The building the was struck first, falls second at free fall speed. Building 7 falls due to fire. All in the same day. No other buildings on the planet have ever fallen due to fire. Smells like bullshit to me.
1234bmonty 4 months ago
hands up for all those who really believe 9/11 was about America being attacked by terrorists? *All the smart people in the room don't raise their hands* Ok now...hands up for those who believe 9/11 was about the US Goverment (namely the Bush administration) going to war and getting rich at the same time? *everyone raises their hand*
LiveFromVCR 5 months ago
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”-Joseph Goebbels
jerjr49 7 months ago
golly gee. let's see. andy. uh, how does concrete get pulverized in mid air? i dunno wilbur. okay, okay, uh, let's see...andy, can fire melt steel...ya know, like, whatcha call it? molten, that's right...molten steel. like flowin' lava in Hawaii. i dunno Wilbur. go google it, or sumthin. ya know Andy, i heard they found some kinda fancy high tech explosive that wuz still live...i think thay call it nanothermite. they could still explode it years later...and thay did. whattya think a that?
jerjr49 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?
If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
ctcole77 7 months ago
Jim Meigs very first point is a good one. He says "...in fact, what we know about that day (9-11) comes from a huge array of sources. From eyewitnesses..." Why then Mr. Meigs, have the hundreds of eyewitness, survivors and first responders testimonies (That there were multiple explosions both under street level and throughout the World Trade Centers prior to collapse.) been completely absent from official accounts?
akl4130 7 months ago
HAHAHAHA Then why don't the feds release the footage of the pentagon being struck? Why is it so easy to find scientists and architects that back the 911 "conspiracy" idea? Baaa baaa sheeple...
givemericht 7 months ago
@givemericht "Why is it so easy to find scientists and architects that back the 911 conspiracy idea" ... Are you serious? Only a few hundred have come out to support it, out of the million or so of architects and scientists around the world, probably even more than that. Hmm so easy to find them? yeah right. You conspiracy nuts really need get out of the house sometimes. Believing these conspiracies are nothing to be proud of.... which is why most people don't take truthers seriously.
we3575 6 months ago
@we3575 It is easy, dipshit, all you need is an internet connection and a brain. You obviously have an internet connection, so you're half way there!
I don't know why you call me a conspiracy nut, I don't believe most conspiracies. I believe in the laws of physics, though, things falling through the path of least resistance and such INSANE notions like that.
givemericht 5 months ago
All you guys are nuts... no planes, missiles, controlled demo?! haha. that's why no one takes you guys seriously. That's why your a nut case and that's why the 9/11 truth movement has been crumbling these days. 9/11 conspiracies are laced with lies and mis-information. Quotes are taken out of context and entire sentances are left out. Do us a favor and stop taking gullible people and making them believe these theories. That's how these theories get passed on.
we3575 5 months ago
@we3575 I believe that planes struck the WTC, I am unconvinced as to what struck the Pentagon and what went down in Shanksville, though I am willing to accept that they were planes. The FBI could easily release footage to show what hit the fistagon but for some reason unknown to me, they don't. My main beef is with the towers, that's the part I don't like. You say gullible but it seems you are willing to believe that the towers defied the laws of physics because your goverment says so.
givemericht 5 months ago
@givemericht Yeah, you truthers take gullible, low IQ people and convince them on these theories. "My friend said this is what happened, so it's got to be true" ... and it's bullshit you truthers deny every single bit of that. You take people who have no knowledge of the attacks and brainwash into believing this bullshit. And then when someone who believes in the official theory you just deny that their even citizens, you claim their paid agents of the government! Haha, sorry saps you guys are.
we3575 5 months ago
@we3575 Actually, I learned most of my physics in school and from documentaries featuring people with all the right credentials. I don't accuse anyone of being paid agents of the government if they're not police, army or civil servants. I don't brainwash anyone, their minds are their own, though I think physics should be applied to all instances like this or you might be misled and start living your life in fear. And conspiracy or not, it was the vehicle for lots and lots of war.
givemericht 5 months ago
So, you believe that several small fires were able to destroy, simultaneously, all of WTC7's 82 columns so that there would be a symmetrical collapse that for 2.5 seconds fell @ freefall acceleration?
WOW!!
Maybe you should lend your expertise to the "world's best engineers" @ the NIST who, since they COULDN'T figure out how freefall was possible (they had earlier claimed that freefall was NOT possible given a fire induced collapse) they labled their report "UNSCIENTIFIC."
1234bmonty 4 months ago
@1234bmonty Why do you nuts need to argue your evidence? I get you truthers are in denial about the US being attacked but you guys need to understand it happened. The US is an vulnerable is as any country. And that's exactly what truthers are, in denial. You guys will deny it all day long but it's the truth. I'd recomend a good therapist... maybe a girlfriend. Stop with the keyboard wars on Youtube,. Oh and to get a laugh out of you gullible little turds... I'm a mossad agent. Fact or lie? haha!
we3575 4 months ago
@1234bmonty "several small fires"...? did you actually say "several small fires"?? r u for real?
JamesIsViolet 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@we3575 So, you believe that several small fires were able to destroy, simultaneously, all of WTC7's 82 columns so that there would be a symmetrical collapse that for 2.5 seconds fell @ freefall acceleration?
WOW!!
Maybe you should lend your expertise to the "world's best engineers" @ the NIST who, since they COULDN'T figure out how freefall was possible (they had earlier claimed that freefall was NOT possible given a fire induced collapse) they labled their report "UNSCIENTIFIC."
1234bmonty 4 months ago
@givemericht The real threat are the jesuits sheeple. The jesuit have always instigated the american citizens to hate america.
1. The civil war. The south even tough were the evil ones for having slaves look themselfs as protestants heros that wanted to save the south from the North and europe
2. The Nazi and hitler were seens as Heros and jewish bankers as devils
3. Communists everywhere in the world Communist were seen as the good ones
4. Islam extremist. The jesuits hate America.
Freshnewz10 5 months ago
@givemericht The real threat are the jesuits sheeple. The jesuit have always instigated the american citizens to hate america.
1. The civil war. The south even tough were the evil ones for having slaves look themselfs as protestants heros that wanted to save the south from the North and europe
2. The Nazi and hitler were seens as Heros and jewish bankers as devils
3. Communists everywhere in the world Communist were seen as the good ones
4. Islam extremist. The jesuits hate America.
Freshnewz10 5 months ago
@Freshnewz10 A Jesuit sheeperson is no more dangerous than an atheist sheeperson.
givemericht 5 months ago
The report was not peer reviewed in any way shape or form it is published for $800.00 to look like it was peer reviewed. tell me where does the Jones report directly link their contaminated samples with no chain of handling to WTC 1 or 2
PhantasyPublishing 7 months ago
go to the wtc exhibit in new york city
there are no conspiracies about this...cmon world
osruilover1 7 months ago
If you are confused on this one just watch debunking 9/11 debunking. It lays it out pretty well if you have an hour and a half. The research was all done by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth
40joel 8 months ago
This cock sucker from Nat. Geo. is an ignorant fuckhead that has been bought and paid for. I'm never wrong about these things....not once.!!!!! 9/11 was an inside job and Bush will someday get whats coming to him....this I promise!!!!!!
dale123ization 9 months ago
@dale123ization Ignorante.
Freshnewz10 5 months ago
In April of 2009 a peer-reviewed paper published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal reported the finding of unignited nano-engineered thermitic materials in multiple samples of World Trade Center dust. The discovery of these materials, is important. Why won't NIST release their data regarding the reports they submitted on the collapse of buildings 1, 2 and 7.
Daddyo930 9 months ago
Popular Mechanics...what a joke...false science...
smokiepost 10 months ago
Well he's a real go getter. He left no stone untouched. Man he is so amazing. If he thinks the REALIST are uninformed that must really make his job suck. To have to spend ALL that time debunking something you think is one big joke about a bunch of fairy tales and their oh so funny jokes. I think I'll believe NYC firefighters.
Did you learn about the Reichstag in school? Bet you did. Did you learn values and how to run the government, how it is supposed to be run or how it is run? Bet you di
redmond1013 10 months ago
WHO paid for this ? Taxes ?
No More theories ?
OK Sir Issac Newton's theories hold no scientific merit ?
"I am opposed to any form of tyranny over the mind of man."
Thomas Jefferson
"Newspeak" George Orwell
2gtrmike 1 year ago
@2gtrmike Thank you. In April of 2009 a peer-reviewed paper published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal reported the finding of unignited nano-engineered thermitic materials in multiple samples of World Trade Center dust. The discovery of these materials, is just some scientific mumbo jumbo probably. Thank god for peer review.
Daddyo930 9 months ago
he nomoretheories i think u shoud talk to RKOwens4 he is also a dubunker
mickey201513 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Another investigation of the anthrax attacks is appropriate. Of course the story is that some insane catholic guys single handedly produced weaponized anthrax and then wrote messages in letters as if he were a jihadist (no motive). Tom Daschle disagrees with this story of course saying that others MUST have been involved. And he was an intended victim of the attack. Vote up if you think the anthrax attacks should be investigated along with 9/11. Copy paste this to other videos.
152czar 1 year ago
1) In WTC rubble, chunks of concrete and metal fused together were found (aka "meteorite"). This shows conclusively that metal was melted. Conventional fires do not burn hot enough to melt steel.
2) Nano thermite found in the dust from WTC's; findings published in peer reviewed scientific journal (google scholar search: thermitic materials 9/11)
3) In the governments own investigation of the anthrax attacks, the primary suspect worked for the US.
4) Investigate 9/11! THUMBS UP if you agree!
152czar 1 year ago
Popular Mechanics rules lol. Honestly popular mechanics destroyed loose change.
Bcm80 1 year ago
Miegs is the definition of a shill. He has absolutely no scientific background, in-fact he is a Philosophy major from Dartmouth. Previous jobs include being the senior editor of Entertainment Weekly.
Popular Mechanics is far from being a scientific journal or reference, their biggest issue is "What to buy daddy for Christmas"
I tend to side with the more than 1300 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Research WTC7 and start connecting the dots people, everything points to INSIDE JOB!
HKmaroLS1 1 year ago
@HKmaroLS1 - I tend to side with the 155,336,477 Architects and Engineers with 9/11 Proof. not 1500 goofballs.
admiralct 1 year ago
@admiralct
Do you mean you agree with the NIST whose report has been repeatedly shown to have holes? Or you agree with the 155,336,477 other sheep who have done no research for themselves and go along with the official story because they somehow feel the people who put it together could do no wrong.
HKmaroLS1 1 year ago
@HKmaroLS1 Nist and Commission report are self acclaimed as the deliverers of the "official story". don't give them so much authoritative power over the situation. i've never even read those books/reports and i don't need to in order to have a more precise idea of what happend and why than people who poke around searching for something that affirms what the interesting conspiracy youtube video shows. so i've heard NIst's report isn't very good and i believe it, it doesn't change what happened.
admiralct 1 year ago
@admiralct
The fact is NIST published bogus reports regarding WTC. There is more then enough evidence for further independent investigation, I'll go ahead and save you the trouble: Buildings don't "collapse" through the path of greatest resistance. In the case of WTC7, the entire structure fell at free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds. This means for that instance in time, there was little to no structural resistance in ANY of the columns on ~8 floors. Fire is not that precise.
HKmaroLS1 1 year ago
@HKmaroLS1 "buildings don't collapse through the path of greatest resistance" this statement is said a lot and it seems as though it would make sense but it is simply wrong-physics is often counter-intuitive. with a skyscraper, straight down is the only path it can take, absolutely the buildings fell through the path of least resistance just as they should have, it couldn't have happened any other way, there isn't enough energy 2 tip it over like a beer. forget the fire and freefall, distracting
admiralct 1 year ago
Tell me how WTC 7 is a steel building that feel at free fall speed from fire, please. I am one of those crazy nutjobs 9/11 truthseekers that served for my country and have questions...
CiTR419 1 year ago
@CiTR419 we can see that.
admiralct 1 year ago
9/11 Truthers sometimes claim that there would not have been enough fire and heat from the fuel of the passenger planes. Type on YouTube "plane crash" you will see at least 10 videos of Airshow or other random, much smaller, planes crash into the ground. See how much fire there is. on 9/11 it was huge passenger planes full of fuel to fly across long distance.
StopFear 1 year ago
@StopFear
it's a fire ball, not a sustained flame. Fuel with that high of octane quickly ignites and burns out, any remaining fires are from objects burning.
HKmaroLS1 1 year ago
I stopped watching when this guy said "the official story actually makes a lot of sense."
TheStroomis 1 year ago
@TheStroomis
oh right, so can you explain, what type of evidence could there be that could prove, that there was no "inside job" ? I mean is there any evidence you may be willing to accept?
StopFear 1 year ago
@StopFear. are you seriously asking us to prove it wasn't an inside job? no thanks, there is no need. do we owe it to the people who have done themselves a diservice by buying into 9/11 Truth theory? is there really anything else that can be said that would make truthers drop their weapons and say "ohp, guess we were wrong. sorry about that!" not gonna happen. the truthers curl up into their dark corners while the rest of us move forward with this planet. 9/11 truth is as dead as that crab meat
admiralct 1 year ago 2
@admiralct
I do not necessarily believe the official story, but if the official report isn't true doesn't follow that it was an inside job, and an "inside job" means a different , wide spectra of things to everyone. Some claim the planes were rockets, some say it was holograms, some say it was a death ray from space. Next guy will say it was an invisible Godzilla monster that was visible from only his angle of view. Either way, whichever the theory I am not seeing the proof you claim
StopFear 1 year ago
It's pretty obvious that there is more then the 'official' reports say to 9/11 just by watching the live new broadcasts from that morning. You'd have to believe that all the newscasters, fireman, police and bystanders were all just lying that morning on live television.
dada5y5 1 year ago
@dada5y5
exactly
StopFear 1 year ago
this are not "theories" you fucking idiot... and people seeking the TRUTH are not talking about "conspiracy" but about the NWO. and the 9/11 is just the begining of it.
KeMoniito 1 year ago
9/11 truthers don't care about the lives lost that day. All of the brave firemen who went in knowing they will die that day. They don't care at all. The are just so insecure and just say all of these conspiracies that way they can feel "important"
They say the building fell due to explosions, but most people don't know what an explosion actually is. Micheal Bay films don't count as credible sources.
Well, call me a government spy and call me an ignorant a-hole all you want, but it wont affect me
TMNoob3 1 year ago
@TMNoob3 government spy, ignorant a-hole
kdavisification 1 year ago
@kdavisification
Yes, everyone that doesn't believe in 9/11 "truth" is obviously a spy. Fuck you asshole.
TMNoob3 1 year ago
@TMNoob3 I didn't say everyone that doesn't believe is a spy, I said YOU are one, you ignorant a-hole.
kdavisification 1 year ago
@kdavisification haha! why are you getting upset?
zume2600 1 year ago
@zume2600 Actually I wasn't upset, I was just doing what he told everyone to do. His exact words were "Well, call me a government spy and call me an ignorant a-hole all you want". So I did.
kdavisification 1 year ago
@kdavisification calm down, people are going to start to discredit your amazing factual information and proof that 9/11 was an inside job. lol!
zume2600 1 year ago
@zume2600 Ok, I'll calm down.
kdavisification 1 year ago
If the NIST report could be peer reviewed I might believe it, till then we know nothing for sure.
doddsoreric 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job and was a false flag attack to bring in the Patriot Act and the New World Order. But good try guys.
breezyvibe 1 year ago
@breezyvibe amen. glad to see someone on here with brains... :)
831Chelsea 1 year ago
@breezyvibe hahah! yea, that's what is was! lol! where can i see your stand-up performance? will you be in the cincinnati-dayton area anytime soon?
zume2600 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zume2600 I just read the personal comments left for you on your youtube page. They read:
steversayz
fucking FAGGOT
playboyxking1
dude fuck off to england bitch your just some white trah
usmcsniper23
lol Your a douche you wish you had a ls on boost you prolly have a ford probe LMFAO
Hmmm . . . and I can see from your page you're a real sharp tool. Hahahahaha.
breezyvibe 1 year ago
the question that still haunts me continuously in my sleep is that, if the 9/11 was not a ramification of a conspiracy, then why does this counterargument theory (against 9/11 truth) emerge only after a decade of the incidence? it took the the 9/11 truth less than a decade to come up with a number of reasonable arguments regarding this matter; if Washington thinks that the truth is that it was a deliberate attack made by an external party then,why is it so hard for them to to convey it?
atonglenon 1 year ago
@atonglenon It emerged only a year or so after 9.11 not a decade later.. And it took time because it was backed by science and data not just empty answers..
ThaWiseJester 1 year ago
Yep, conspiracy theorists number one source of "facts" is other conspiracy theorists. They do not provide sources, or real fact, they use fake names, fake facts, etc. etc. Don't tell that to the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, though, they'll think you're part of the conspiracy :(
Tripo1iSamson 1 year ago
The conspiracies have all been debunked, so the "truthers" have gone farther and farther with their conspiracies, claiming that there's secret agencies, huge conspiracies, holograms, aliens, orbs, all sortsa shit that makes their nuttiness seem validated. Conspiracy theorists are children that need to be guided out of their suicidal ignorance. That or prescribe some anti-psychosis medicine. If a conspiracy theorist says the sky is orange, you're never going to change their "mind."
Tripo1iSamson 1 year ago
STupid arguement guys. It was a controlled demolition, PERIOD. Good God, how much more proof do you need?
The damned thing fell perfectly symmetrically, at free-fall speed. THAT, by itself IS ENOUGH to prove CD. Symmetrical collapse at free fall speed is not possible, NOT POSSIBLE without explosives. Helllooooooooooooooo!!!
PERIOD.
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
You are one of those people who could have Osama about to shoot you in the head, and he'd tell you,,"Just between me and you, I planned this thing by myself.,your goverment wasnt involved". You still wouldnt believe him a few seconds before he was to shoot you....Damn your dumb...all your lame theories are rejected by 99% of all Americans...damn....all you dumb theories have been debunked for 5 years already...drop this crap and enroll in college already...this cant be your excuse forever
JPPolachek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
two planes dissappeard into thin air on 9/11 come on lets get real now...I may be some dumb but i aint plum dumb...shanksville p.a mayor stated and I got the video to prove this that when he arrived at the crash site there was and i repeat..there was no plane nothing but a hole..so no bodies no plane just a hole so u take that were you take it...
edgell911 2 years ago
Stevan Jones has presented a great deal on credible evidence which supports the claims that the WTC buildings fell as a result of Controlled Demoliion... Anyway, are you blind? Do you know what an explosion is?
dbetsa 2 years ago
don't believe a word this guy on this video is saying , he sed they found body n blackboxs from the plane, yes n im white with black skin!!! if this is true then theres nothing 2 hide so why did the FBI take all the footage that show the crash n hide it from the people , y can't they show us n let us see the crash 4 ourselves , because it was not a plane, this man is probably a spy 4 the government u fucking lying piece of shit/ 9/11 was a inside job
southsidewarrior22 2 years ago
@southsidewarrior22 With a reasoned and articulate argument like that, who could possibly reach any other conclusion? And asserting that this guy is a government spy? A touch of brilliance. It certainly doesn't show the tendency of truthers to assert huge claims without any evidence whatsoever.
andyissemicool 2 years ago
sweet personal attack, bro!
monkinator66 2 years ago
Not personal. It's a pointed criticism of the Truth Movement who seems to think that anyone who disagrees with them (on the basis of shite evidence offered) is a government spy.
andyissemicool 2 years ago
pointed? it is a generalization. what shit evidence? can you be more specific? scientific process is lacking in the official story. read books!!
monkinator66 2 years ago
I don't say I buy the official story. I say evidence for controlled demolition is nil. The buildings did not fall at freefall speed, there is no evidence of thermite, there is no evidence of any kind of plot by gov't officials to bring it down (much less that they actually did), and of the hundreds of people that must have been involved in this conspiracy, not one has come forward. There is no reason to believe that the government planned 9/11. They are criminally negligent for it, however.
andyissemicool 2 years ago
@andyissemicool, The problem is that some people don't base their conclusion upon evidence, but instead base them upon the hypothesis they had going in.
When I get shills who constantly deny that explosive nanothermite can be painted on, despite clear evidence that it can:
watch?v=BiEneFVJoXc
I have to be very suspicious of these people, their motives, and who they are. Especially after reading Cass Sunstein's paper...
NanoThermite911 2 years ago
I don't deny that nanothermite COULD have been placed in the towers, there is just no evidence for it. The only alleged evidence that I've found is from Steven Jones, and his chemical signatures do not contain all the chemicals necessary for thermate.
andyissemicool 2 years ago
@andyssemicool,
All that is necessary for an Aluminothermic reaction is powdered Aluminum and Rust. Nanothermite contains these ingredients in nanopowder form, and in perfect stochiometric mixture.
There is absolutely no getting around this fact.
This is what was found in the WTC Dust.
It shows that whoever planned this went through incredible lengths not to get caught.
Unfortunately for them, the DID get caught. They will now have to pay for their crimes.
NanoThermite911 2 years ago
So you're saying the only way that aluminum and rust could have been found at WTC is because of thermate? I don't think so.
I am not a scientist, but I have read that aluminum oxide and barium nitrate are byproducts of a thermate reaction, but I do not know of a single piece of evidence that states that these have been found at the WTC site.
How much thermate do you think was necessary to take down the buildings and where do you think it was all placed?
andyissemicool 2 years ago
@andy,
The key word is "Stochiometric"... That means something chemically. It means that the ingredients were mixed in perfect amounts for a reaction to proceed.
Also the particulate size is another factor, you'll be hard pressed to explain with normal building materials...
How much FIRE do you believe was necessary to cause the buildings to collapse, then ask yourself how much thermite would be needed...
NanoThermite911 2 years ago
More than a couple tons of thermate would be needed to burn the columns sufficiently to destroy the towers. The whole stoichiometric equation I made up during lab time today takes up too much space. Basically, it takes approximately 4.8 lbs to burn a small hole in a aluminum engine block. Extrapolate that out to burning through a single column at one point on one floor. Then multiply that by how many structure points would need to be compromised. It comes out to a couple tons of thermate.
GarbageGnome 2 years ago
Oh yeah,,they tested Thermite when he first made these claims and guess what...it couldnt cut through a 1 inch steel pipe......so then awhile later he came back saying it was now "Superthermite".. But then he started saying "Nano thermite...he keeps making this stuff up...Nano thermite is not something anyone has ever seen , there is no info out on it, so it makes the perfect thing to blame for the collapse..Because noone can say what it can do because noone knows..LOL.hes the worst scammer.
JPPolachek 1 year ago
@NanoThermite911 You're disregarding all the refutations about thermite being found, idiot. You seem to disregard most things that don't fit your narrow-minded tunnel-vision view of the world. Isn't it ironic that non-conspiracy theorists are more open minded that conspiracy theorists are? I think so. You obviously don't think at all. Quit insulting history and the people who died and the people who fight to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Fucking dipshit baby.
Tripo1iSamson 1 year ago
His dust sample is no good...It was recovered from some womens apartment 1 month after 9/11. She had red paint in the room=the red "thermite chips" he found...that is a contaminated sample and no pro Lab in the world would accept such evidence..but this loser doesnt care...Also it was NEGATIVE FOR THERMITE.. It lacked the chemicals from the Combustion of thermite...All scientist agree it is negative...it only contains normal elements from the building....Please do your own reaserch, dont trust
JPPolachek 1 year ago
I believe what the govt tells me to believe: a few Bad Guys in Caves Who Hate US for Our Freedom crashed 2 planes at WTC and made 3 highly engineered skyscrapers dissolve into dust in seconds; the same BGs crashed 2 more planes leaving almost no debris; the Pentagon cameras recorded nothing worth mentioning; NORAD was very busy at the time and missed all this; the WTC steel was recycled immediately to aid the rescue effort; we couldn't stop the attacks but we knew within minutes who did it.
LIFEmimicsART 2 years ago
Sir Isaac Newton is/wasn't a "Conspiracy Theorist"...That's whom I cite in regards to 9/11...
SlopEye420 2 years ago
I can also believe a plane hiting the Pentagon at that speed would be destroyed so badly u couldn't find wreckage. I just have a hard time believing an inexperienced pilot could fly that fast, that low, dodging trees and powerlines, could put that plane into the Pentagon perfectly on the first try.
Alot of air force pilots flying highly maneuverable designed craft have trouble flying that low to the ground in planes meant for that. This was a plane that was not meant for that, lol.
jasonj79 2 years ago
Jet fuel may get hot off to burn steel. But the jet fuel was that large fire ball you seen twice outside the towers when the planes hit. All the jet fuel burnt up on impact. What else would have caused those fire balls? See he doesn't tell u that part.
They also don't consider how much jet fuel it would take to melt all that steel. Those buildings were huge. How much jet fuel would it have taken to do that? More than was on that plane.
jasonj79 2 years ago
the steel never melted it was weakened and was no longer strong enough to hold up the floors above it
kjcarpenter1221 2 years ago
But don't you think it's kind of odd that the whole building would come down in the form of pulverized concrete? Which is what the dust cloud's were.
I could see steel melting and doing that, but not smashing the supporting floors underneith and taking out the remaining steel columns.
I could see the top part of the building falling into the bottom floors, which they would then support. Not completely collapsing into pulverized dust in a matter of seconds.
jasonj79 2 years ago
Especially TWICE (both towers).
This would be more plausible if the planes would have hit the lower half. More weight coming down. But the didn't. They hit the upper half. If the upper steel columns were weakened by jet fuel, the columns half way down and to the bottom weren't. So what caused them to give away? Once again, the same thing on BOTH buildings?
Then look at how WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane and collapsed the SAME way.
jasonj79 2 years ago
If explosives/thermite were set in the tower's and the column's cut, then it was very for them to do.
Marvin Bush (George's Brother) was the one in charge of security for the WTC complex. He quit Sept. 10.
Two weeks before 9/11 there was a security lockdown. So, if Marvin was in charge of security, his men could have been preparing and bringing in materials for weeks and no one would have known.
jasonj79 2 years ago
that wasnt pulverized concrete it was pulverized drywall which was aboundant in the wtc
kjcarpenter1221 2 years ago
@kjcarpenter1221 Then please tell me what happened to all the concrete then?
jasonj79 2 years ago
@kjcarpenter1221 Ok, so, your telling me because the steel was weakened on the "Top" floors, it crushed and pulverized everything underneith within 10 seconds.
jasonj79 2 years ago
The reason CT's zero in on little details that are thought to be anomalous is because those "little details" are not explained and ignored by the Gov't.
Example: Plane hit the pentagon. Ok all the gov't has to do to prove this is show more video footage, but instead they show a few small frames from ONE camera. The Pentagon has camera's all over the place aimed at that location. If u think that's the only footage they have, then I have Jesus hiding out in my bathroom.
jasonj79 2 years ago
Who cares about non-existent video footage? There were 136 eyewitness that say they saw an American Airlines plane crash into the Pentagon.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
And there was a high number of people that reported seeing no plane or a missile hit as well.
So they could settle this once and for all by releasing more footage. Like the videotape confiscated from the hotel across the road.
jasonj79 2 years ago
Both the tape from the Doubletree Hotel and the one from the gas station were released in 2006.
Several passengers including Barbara Olson made phone calls and reported that the plane was hijacked.
There were pieces of aircraft spread all the way up the road, at least a third of a mile from the impact site.
Remains of the passengers and those victims on the ground at the Pentagon were found and identified.
Photographs of victim remains at the Pentagon were presented at the Moussaoui trial.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
Now see there, that damn 9/11 Truth Movement didn't tell me that. I'm going to cuss em out.
jasonj79 2 years ago
Ok this guy from PM says that CT's get there info from outside org's. So does the gov't. Are we to really believe IF the gov't did this, they WOULD come out and admit it? Are we to believe they would use the Mainstream Media (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) to report the truth? When these news stations are owned by the corps who would have benefited from this tragedy? Fox is republican, CNN is democrat. Would they really report this to cause the people to get angry?
jasonj79 2 years ago
This is what I want people to explain to me: Why do people believe so strongly the gov't wouldn't do this and to dismiss these theories right away?
Where do you folks get this from
jasonj79 2 years ago
phyve starz
irateuup 2 years ago
if you want truth and honesty go and search the truth about FEMA CAMPS
everyone61 2 years ago
FEMA was the most obvious organization in the world.
Its everybody's fault. Including the government.
BUT 9/11 and TOXIC WATERR OMGGG can't be believed worth a dick.
AssasinForJesus 2 years ago
Today NORAD conducts a lot of anti drug smuggling operations and does track planes in the US, but only if the planes entter the US. Their resources and surveillance are still projected out of and NOT into the US
ars21689 2 years ago
To the "war games" theory, yes, there were military excercises taking place on 9/11 in response to a long range bombing excercise that Russia had conducted. The games that took place were focused outward, not into the US. And for those who can't believe NORAD would have gaps in its coverage, why don't you jackasses research the reason NORAD was created. To give early warning of a Soviet air or nuclear attack.
ars21689 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The discovery of nano thermite in WTC dust means game over for NIST. Look up major NIST scientists's connections to nano thermite research
To me, the implications of this are monsterous.
Now we will see how long it takes for the US media to even give us the news of this peer reviewed Danish study already breaking in Europe.
Game over..........
mfriedlin 2 years ago
i love how this schmuck who's talking doesnt mention the war games taking place that day and just says "there were 14 planes ready to fly" ... conspiracy theorists might quote other conspiracy theorists, but i dont find this guy all that credible either. He bashes conspiracy theorists for "focusing on a few anomolies," but its just as bad when he himself doesnt mention important information at all, like the war games...sry, but this vid doesnt suppress my belief in conspiracy theories about 911
ptowndude87 2 years ago
Well its a fact that war games were taking place during 911.
Now you know damn well that this country knew that something was going to happen during this day. My question is why did they plan war games on the same day?
also WTC Building 7. nuff said
Fat8thProductions 2 years ago
No, not "nuff said"
There is a word called "coincidense", is it truly NOT possible for these two events to have accidently been planned for the same day? Do you REALLY think that AMERICAN fighter pilots would be ok with participating with this? You DO OF COURSE know they have psychological exams regularly to make sure they are stable individuals in order to be at the controls of armaments that can cause mass destruction?
joeysmom6074 2 years ago
And the war games are done several times a year.. in all of the Armed Forces branches.. In order to act appropriately in such an event that the US is attacked.. And not run around saying "what do I do? What do I do!!?" But the MAIN ISSUE is we were not prepared for an attack within the US.. Did you realize that?
Nuff said???
joeysmom6074 2 years ago
Totally missed the point.
U.S. was tipped off that something was going to happen on this day. This is a proven fact even though you won't ever see it on the idiot box at home.
They knew and still did nothing, and not only that but they plan war games on the same day? Honestly there is a mountain of new evidence that has come to the surface since that day PROVING that there is something else to the official story of 911. Just because Fox News hasn't reported on it doesn't make it untrue.
Fat8thProductions 2 years ago
keep sleeping guys, while the real patriots is fighting the nwo and the criminals. This video is baseless, my ear hurts whenever somebody tries to debunk the real facts.
mds1993 2 years ago
What "real facts"??? Parts of quotes? Videos cropped? Outlandish conjecture? What planet are you from? The ONLY way these "truth movement" THEORIES can hold water, is if YOUR too blind to believe what your eyes are seeing.. You literally HAVE to WANT it to be true.. How come over 200+ videos were being filmed by the general public, NOT ONE OF THEM supports you.. There are your facts!
joeysmom6074 2 years ago
as if the victims families of 9/11 even going to listen to this facts, they even call it an inside job....and a reinvestigation...
mds1993 2 years ago
PEOPLE STILL WANT TO BELIEVE THE GOV SO BAD ... when will they learn .....
were is the accountability ....
occision 2 years ago
have you looked at other events, of government sponsored terrorism.
nero burning rome, blames it on the chritians.
hitler burns the reichstag, blames the jews, and passes the enabling act.
"some one" brings down 3 world trade center buildings, and hits the pentagon, and bush passes the PATRIOT ACT.
xMasterShake9x 2 years ago
By your logic, we must have also caused World War 2 to happen, since we benefited SO greatly from the war itself. We also had another economic boon due to the reconstruction of Europe. That must be why we destroyed so many buildings, so that Europe would love us so much when we rebuilt them and opened up European economy to American goods.
By that logic, America must have caused WW2 in order to eventually profit from it. Redictulous
Morusaki 2 years ago
no, America looked back at WW2 and realized that after the war, we made a ton of money. and they thought, "maybe if we start WW3, once its over, the same thing will happen!"
i think its safe to say "duhh"
donkeypoo99 2 years ago
probably the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
amphibwarrior0321 2 years ago
and by YOUR logic, you would say that if something works once, you would never ever ever do it again. and i assume you also believe that there has never been a corrupt government in the history of the world.
ever heard of insurance fraud? think of it as that, but on a massive scale
donkeypoo99 2 years ago
funny part is that America did have a role in the development of the war.
Before the 2nd war, Germany was heavily taxed and was driving into galloping inflation and instability.
These sanctions gave birth to hitler.
The sanctions were born with the help of USA.
The sanctions were
Kirilltraceur 2 years ago
i like penis because tv told me too
BillPawlowski1 2 years ago
LOL - What a load of crap. I have to clean my ears out now darn it!
SkullsDog 2 years ago
The "debunkers" in this video know the 100% FACTS about 9/11 but they couldnt even spell James Meigs' name right? They spelled it MIGGS!!
lmr892 2 years ago
Look at the way you sieze on the tiniest thing. Symptomatic?
Should I criticise your lack of punctuation and ignore you for it?
Are you going to prove that debunkers know things 100%? Who claimed this?
Intiom 2 years ago
Adkinsjr... No need to argue with complete morons. We know what happened, and what happened does not come from fake stories of information thought up by conspiranuts. To the owner of this truthfull video of common sense and facts, keep up the great work.
unitedflight93heroes 2 years ago
The planes and who was on and what got switched is step 4 , 5 we have alotta other questions to clear up before we get to that part .. we must first bring forth the perps .. and for them to be running the extact terror scene attacks and in the drills the same day is just to throw the good people in the positions off .. just like 7/7 they had the extact same terror drills ont hat day and again the terror drills turned out to be reality ? do you know the odds of that? honestly
yourboycal 3 years ago
Days until an investigation was ordered into the Pearl Harbour attack: 9
Days until an investigation was ordered into the Kennedy assassination: 7
Days until an investigation was ordered into the Challenger disaster: 7
Number of days until an investigation was ordered into the sinking of the Titanic: 6
Number of days until an investigation was ordered into the 9/11 attacks: 411
Now when a person with no knowledge of 9/11 sees that .. what can they conclude cupcake?
yourboycal 3 years ago 4
Can you atleast agree with me we dont need to hire anymore demolition people ? we just need to set a few fires in the building and watch it collpase just like building 7 right? =p funny how so many of the government offices with lots of documents were in that building and just happened to get erased .. tell me why they would take off most of the steel to be recycled right after 9/11? isnt this a crime scene? why are we destroying evidence?
yourboycal 3 years ago 2
It wasn't just the fire that caused the collapse. The impact of the plane caused severe structural damage and either wiped out or serverly damaged the majority of the verticle columns. The raging inferno than slowly weakend what was left of the support columns until it the entire structure gave way.
adkinsjr 3 years ago
The plane caused the serve strucural damage? to make both buildings fall identically in the same way? at near free fall speed? even though the engineers of the towers said it was designed to take mulitiple Impacts for air planes..b-25 crashed into the empire state building in 1945 ...did absoltey nothing to the building expcet cause a fire which weakened nothing ....how is this so hard ..thoose are steel structure buildings with masive cores .. and you think fire brought it down?
yourboycal 3 years ago
Don't you realize how many people and passangers were on those planes? Don't you think that American airlines would notice if they actually weren't missing any pilots or airplanes? The conspiracy theories just don't make any sense. Especially in the case of flight 77 where the theorist there was no plane at all! WTF? Then were the hell is flight 77, the pilots, the crew and the passengers?
You people are fucking retarded.
adkinsjr 3 years ago 4
Dont worry about the planes and who was on it and what kinda planes..we establish that after we get past step 1 .. which is the government lied about what happened that day and it was delibreate and we need to find out who was giving orders and who messed up that day.. do you realize how many people should've been fired for letting the american people down? yet i see theese fuckers get promoted on a job well done? lol i know the trillion dollar defence system didnt fail from 4 hijackers :p sry
yourboycal 3 years ago
@adkinsjr The good news is that the Truth movement is finally dying out..
ThaWiseJester 1 year ago
Oh one more thing .... Do you realize we dont have to hire expensive demolition teams any more??? i mean look at builiding 7 .. it seems all you have to do is set a few fires and watch it perfectly fall into its footsteps LMFO ....i really cant believe its that hard to see its controlled demolition .. when people cant see the obvious with there own eyes .. im afraid this world is fucked
yourboycal 3 years ago
lol i still cant over the fact you watched 3 demolition videos and you couldnt see the extact same thing on 9/11 loool .. do you know what it takes for a building to fall close to the free fall speed? demolitions ! .. if there was resistance as the building fell it would take alot longer..and they've tried to recreate how it fell in models and cant get the same results
yourboycal 3 years ago
I'll tell you why 9/11 can never be discovered its inside job. Because they we go back to kennedy ,, go back to the moon landing .. go back to pearl harbour..go back to vietnam ..go back to the world wars .. were they all fabricated all along? and the people taken for a ride? if all theese things get exposed what is america? a country proud of lies? the whole history of america is tainted my friend ..and thats a box many refuse to open because it would devistate millions of good people
yourboycal 3 years ago
Agreed. Same thing applies for my country though but I accept that the reason we got so powerful and built an empire was through greed and violence. Every war the US has entered has had an alternate motive, it wasn't just about "stopping the bad guys." World Wars 1 and 2 were financial, Vietnam was fear of communism/spread of democracy, Iraq for oil control etc There's been so many events to create scapegoats, but people refuse to believe it.
Laurence000001 2 years ago
yea they refuse to believe it because they have the best form of mind control.. and thats propeganda from media ,,remember repititon is the best form of mind control....say a lie long enough eventually they'll believe it =:D subscribe to learn more !
yourboycal 2 years ago
Ask you self why a government would do such a thing to its own people? perhaps it was to get support to go to war and secure oil lines? when that was fading they had to make up weapons of mass destruction...like really how do you fuck up that intelligence and be so wrong..somebody should be fire because our tax payer dollars obviosly are ran by a bunch of morans who confused a country for having weapons...thats either a really big fuck up or was a lie to begin with
yourboycal 3 years ago
Oh and i've seen Owens videos...unlike you i check both sides of the story before making up my mind ... his videos are weak and its the same response as popular mechanics .. but when you try and debate popular mechanics they hide there faces...same with other people .. they cant debate this issue because they know they cant win ..that day 3 buildings broke the laws of pysics you dont think thats a little weird.. you dont think its weird the building engineers said it could take mulitiple planes?
yourboycal 3 years ago
is everybody under me really saying 9/11 wasnt an inside job? because if you are then im sorry pal.. i wish i could do something for ya..the obvious isnt enough .. this videos just a joke right? someones pulling my strings? haha funny guys!
yourboycal 3 years ago
Its funny how when a conspiracy is debunked, the morons just make-up some other stupid conspiracy. Anything to hate the government, what a bunch of idiots.
9/11 was NOT a conspiracy! Get your narrow-minded brains together!
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
where has your government brought you? lost liberties? perhaps millions of lost job? or maybe the millions of homes robbed from there rightful owners? or perhaps you speak of the wars they brought? or maybe the flouride they have in our water? or perhaps you mean the untested gentically modified foods .. or maybe your talking about taking the natural medicines out so they can replace it with there drugs.. or just maybe you could be talking about destroying the consitution .. boo government
yourboycal 3 years ago
That's not the point, the point is that this was NOT a conspiracy. Bush could raise taxes by $100,000,000.00 per person and I would still know that 9/11 was not a conspiracy.
Where's Obama going to lead us? The same direction Jimmy Carter did; straight down the crapper!
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
Lol thats not the point? obama is on the same pay roll as bush.. along with mccain and hilary .. you dont seem to notice how bad the government screws you everyday .. then your gonna trust them to tell you what happened on 9/11? how many days did it take for the list of the 19 hijackers to come out? pretty fast investigation wouldnt you say so ? yet we couldnt find one weapon of mass destruction in iraq.. our intelligence isnt very intelligent :)
yourboycal 3 years ago
Okay so if you're so smart (which you're not) then how did the buildings collapse?
I can't wait to hear this!
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
all you have to do is youtube controlled demolitoions...and see what a professional job looks like...now play the 9/11 videos beside it .. honestly if you really cant see the similiarities then you just choose to close your eyes .. you can say planes hit but then why would building 7 fall the extact same way? the smoking gun is right there .. how is this so difficult for everybody to understand/? just with your own eyes loooooooook
yourboycal 3 years ago
I did, and controlled demolitions make an extremely loud BANG! None of the 9/11 videos made any loud BANG sound, they all just made crumbling sounds. Also, no evidence was found of a controlled demolition.
Watch this:
watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k&feature=channel_page
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
lol the building disintergrated into thin air .. there was melted steel at the bottoem burning up evidence.. if it was a inside job why would they find evidence against them self??? can you listien to your self and how rational you are ? really your not .. and how about you tube 9/11 eyewitniess and lets ask them if they heard any explosions.. perhaps the fire man who demonstrated boom booom boom was high on something right?
yourboycal 3 years ago
The building did not disintegrate into thin air. And no, there was no melted steel. Steel cannot melt unless its at 2750 degrees F. Steel, however loses 50% of its strength at around 1100.
And (since you think the Government is so evil) if it truley was a conspiracy, then why didn't those 9/11 conspirators just 'dissapear'?
And I read all the quotes, and none of them said they heard a demolition. Of course they'll be explosions (a/c units, etc.). All quotes are distorted by 9/11 'truthers
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
lmfo no melted steel? you wanan bet pal? you wanna see satilite images of the red hot melted steel core of the disaster?? why would you think demolition if your standing there ..with all the panic goign on .. you really think its a terrorist attack..its only after when you sit down compare it with other demolitions you actually see hey ! thers a fucking problem here .. buildings dont ever fall like that from fire.. and the jet fuel you say? well that burnt off initial explosion..sooooooo
yourboycal 3 years ago
How can there be melted steel if the fires of the jet fuel only made it to 1,800 degrees? Once again, I watched three demolitions and I watched four different 9/11 videos. Not a demolition.
And there wasn't any construction worker (who had backgrounds in controlled demolition) who said it was a demolition.
By the way, work on your spelling, you need it bad.
rockonzeppelin 3 years ago
sorry for my spelling...second thermite melts steel .. if termite was used for the demolition wouldnt that explain the molton pools of steel that was recorded by satilite imagary ..? you watched demolition videos put them together and you didnt see a demolition? lol well if your that blind to the obvious you need some help .. and i can show you controlled demotilition workers who do say it was a demolition .. you dont reserach that far did you?? do i have to do all the homework