The next add should be: "Rafael's Armor,The best way to protect your vehicle against anything except Kornet,Faggot,EFPs,rpg 32,rpg 29 and rpg 7 from the rear or top.Rafael's Armor will protect you from WW2 mines and small road side bombs.The best expensive choice against bullets"
alll i need is russian tech all other is shit-lol "pioneer in armomr tech" fucking ignorant gay!I ask you who made kontakt-5,ERA,shtora,drozd2,arena???Suck russian dick!
APFSDS is an acronym - that's why all letters are capitalized. And some people carry it over to the Sabot, even thought its a normal word and shouldn't have to be capitalized.
those morons got the country locations all wrong! lmfao! last time i checked lebanon was still on the Mediterranean sea and iraq wasn't in Iran. MAJOR FAIL
@kiwininja100 they tried that in wwII with the king tiger and tiger tank... they were unstoppable.. but they costs shitloads of money to make, repair, and fuel.
Reactive explosive armor has already been countered by using two charges in one round. The first removes the reactive armor, the second deployes the traditional shaped charge. While reactive explosive armor requires the opposing force to use newest generation ATGM it is still only one step further down the infinite arms race and did not winn a lot of time actually (I wonder if that is the reason why there are still state of the art tanks that never adopted reactive armor).
p.s. the real question is what type(s?) of active defense system will succeed. Israel deployed a real interception system (by RAFAEL too) in order to actually kill the missile before impact with counter fire. The dominant approach so far has been to conceal the vehicle with a cloud of smoke with added stuff to counter IR and radar and move the vehicle a little. Obviously that approach does not work for urban warfare therefore IDF had to go first with the interception system yet to prove it works
Reactive explosive armor has already been countered by using two charges in one round. The first removes the reactive armor, the second deployes the traditional shaped charge. While reactive explosive armor requires the opposing force to use newest generation ATGM it is still only one step further down the infinite arms race and did not winn a lot of time actually (I wonder if that is the reason why there are still state of the art tanks that never adopted reactive armor).
@drive83 no you fucking moron, where the RED CIRCLE is, that is lebanon. the country's name is ABOVE the red circle. seriously i can't belive how stupid people are.
I would argue against that point. You can be innovating and invent "something" but unless its affordable and actually makes a real difference then its pointless. Retro fitting a vehicle with armour even if it takes 5 mins is useless because an attack will happen when you dont expect it to.
@headphones222 man, Israelis made an aircraft in the 80s, the Lavi, which has all the features that Eurofighter has today, superior stability at take off, hence higher payload capacity, better manuveurability , the Americans had to pay Israel to shut the Lavi project down because it threatened all other aircraft out of the market, both F16 and Mig, you say they are not inventive? they are 20 years ahead of Lockheed and other big firms
I have a very hard time believing what you're saying just because its not the case lol. Im sorry but they are not 20 years ahead of lockheed martin... Israel is buying the OLD technology of US!
@headphones222 is not difficult to beat Lockheed Martin, Or Boeing, Airbus has introduced new innovations to civilan aircraft that Boeing don't have, if you have better engineers you can make something better. The Israeli scientists are among the best in the world, who founded Daussault aerospace in france? who makes the best drones today? who does microprocessor research for Intel?
@headphones222 and second, the big firms are focused on big projects and maximizing profits, they are interested in making warplanes, tanks, missiles, but the tools used to counter or fake these weapons, such as fake flying missiles is a different country-specific market, small firms can quickly change their products, they use few engineers and have a good full view of what is happening, fake targets is a market we don't even hear about, they can fool any kind of radar
Armor on top of armor. btw fuck Israel
Mathaius833 1 day ago
@Mathaius833 fuck you too :)
TheDeathrayd 35 seconds ago
i still dont understand how it works
DeathGhost809 1 week ago
The next add should be: "Rafael's Armor,The best way to protect your vehicle against anything except Kornet,Faggot,EFPs,rpg 32,rpg 29 and rpg 7 from the rear or top.Rafael's Armor will protect you from WW2 mines and small road side bombs.The best expensive choice against bullets"
Abo82Trab 1 week ago
@Abo82Trab
im sure that you are an Military Doctor with 12 Studying years!
WhatsWrongWithMaxi 1 week ago
@WhatsWrongWithMaxi No. Just a Masters Degree
Abo82Trab 1 week ago
Comment removed
WhatsWrongWithMaxi 1 week ago
@Abo82Trab
I am convinced!
Loser..
WhatsWrongWithMaxi 1 week ago
perhaps in the future there will be smart warheads that fire wrenches to undo those bolts and dis-armor those tanks.
XLAWANGELS 2 weeks ago
War = never ending business
Weavers07 2 weeks ago 2
NICE!!!
GrizzlyGunsmith99 2 weeks ago
Хуйня, руское лутче!
PavLovMEN1 3 weeks ago
alll i need is russian tech all other is shit-lol "pioneer in armomr tech" fucking ignorant gay!I ask you who made kontakt-5,ERA,shtora,drozd2,arena???Suck russian dick!
luka2298 1 month ago
0:51 - easy transportations? with B-52 :-D imho throw MBT as o bomb is not the best solution:-D
silenykralik 1 month ago
SOMAILIA???O.O
Xavi997 2 months ago
So who's this Rafael guy?
lulle103 2 months ago
all good till you run up against an M1A1 packing SABOT rounds
MrTurdFurgerson 2 months ago
@MrTurdFurgerson Why did you capitalize sabot?
poprocks4 2 months ago
@poprocks4
APFSDS is an acronym - that's why all letters are capitalized. And some people carry it over to the Sabot, even thought its a normal word and shouldn't have to be capitalized.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@52111centrumcz I know APFSDS is an acronym (technically its actually an initialism). I just thought that *he* though sabot was an acronym.
poprocks4 2 months ago
@poprocks4
Probably because the two go hand in hand - so people may forget or assume both should be capitalized. Don't know really.
52111centrumcz 2 months ago
@poprocks4 Because it look's SCARY that way, LOL
CerebrumPedere 2 months ago
They made a bomb (pun intended) from killing brown people, well done! *face palm*
Mandoon 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TOP I like this video
ftopdirs 2 months ago
@hotpocketpoison I ment 0 t-72 tanks
MrRussian19 2 months ago
Rafael is a smart dude.
EminidisMike 2 months ago
now only 9.99 :D
boxol20 2 months ago
@boxol20
And if you call NOW, you will get a tank for free xD
TheMightyZwom 2 months ago 3
easy transportation and they show a B-52?
Dogmeat1950 3 months ago
Amazing NAZI technology!
88Phobos 3 months ago
@88Phobos What i mean: Look Tiger ViE armor... "sandwich" if it would had been angled also: totally impossible to KILL!
88Phobos 3 months ago
Where can i buy it?
xXFuzionKing 3 months ago
LOL @ where lebanon is at 1:11, lebanon is next to israel :p
Mattc23q 3 months ago
@brezant Not in Israel (this is an Israeli company) and nato has exactly 0 tanks.
MrRussian19 3 months ago
@MrRussian19 0 tanks? the US alone has over 4300 M1A1s and over 1500 M1A2s.
hotpocketpoison 2 months ago
yo dawg i heard you like armor so we put armor on your armor....
Something007SC 3 months ago
Where was Rafael armor used on Kosovo? Serbs did not use it so it must be the other "unarmed people" side. I wonder.
tomcatinc 3 months ago
I need some on my bicycle please.
iTzCaill0u 3 months ago 4
0:26 Selling weapons to the enemy, shame.
MrRussian19 4 months ago
@MrRussian19 Ты фильтруй немного... Где тут позор?.. Ты хоть примерно знаешь, сколько Т-72 в странах НАТО?
brezant 3 months ago
those morons got the country locations all wrong! lmfao! last time i checked lebanon was still on the Mediterranean sea and iraq wasn't in Iran. MAJOR FAIL
laust69 4 months ago
Ra'fail' Armor Protection System
BlackmanTheJock 4 months ago
israeli technology world numbr 1
sakkaaplayboys 4 months ago
heres another way! make it thicker
kiwininja100 4 months ago
@kiwininja100 they tried that in wwII with the king tiger and tiger tank... they were unstoppable.. but they costs shitloads of money to make, repair, and fuel.
WaagooshTheRedFox 4 months ago
@kiwininja100 thicker means more weight and less efficency
davidds0 4 months ago
i thought this was about soul calibur :(
dizquier91 4 months ago
LOL Levanon is There :D
VladiSSius 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Reactive explosive armor has already been countered by using two charges in one round. The first removes the reactive armor, the second deployes the traditional shaped charge. While reactive explosive armor requires the opposing force to use newest generation ATGM it is still only one step further down the infinite arms race and did not winn a lot of time actually (I wonder if that is the reason why there are still state of the art tanks that never adopted reactive armor).
itteerde 5 months ago
p.s. the real question is what type(s?) of active defense system will succeed. Israel deployed a real interception system (by RAFAEL too) in order to actually kill the missile before impact with counter fire. The dominant approach so far has been to conceal the vehicle with a cloud of smoke with added stuff to counter IR and radar and move the vehicle a little. Obviously that approach does not work for urban warfare therefore IDF had to go first with the interception system yet to prove it works
itteerde 5 months ago
Reactive explosive armor has already been countered by using two charges in one round. The first removes the reactive armor, the second deployes the traditional shaped charge. While reactive explosive armor requires the opposing force to use newest generation ATGM it is still only one step further down the infinite arms race and did not winn a lot of time actually (I wonder if that is the reason why there are still state of the art tanks that never adopted reactive armor).
itteerde 5 months ago
This is perfect for armoured vehicles brazilians!!!!!!
mdmagui2 5 months ago
all this good stuff doesnt matter if its hit with an EMP....will make a great paperwight tho...
VictorVonFox 7 months ago
This is bullshit, lebanon is in caucasus and iraq is in persia
Vamutus 9 months ago
1:11 Lebanon? Looks like Russia or Georgia.
drive83 10 months ago 43
@drive83 Nooo, that's where it is pretty much
VicariousReality7 9 months ago
@VicariousReality7
It's actually just north of Israel.
ParamoreWorshipper 8 months ago
@drive83 no you fucking moron, where the RED CIRCLE is, that is lebanon. the country's name is ABOVE the red circle. seriously i can't belive how stupid people are.
tanker1408 7 months ago
@drive83 Also, Iraq = Iran.
Motive11331 7 months ago
@drive83 yep thats georgia :D that means israel wanted to atack georgia and russia was against lebanon , they just had wrong maps :D
grumman84 5 months ago
@drive83 :D Yes, on the map is Georgian region Tskhinvali
probably it means thet rafael's armour was used in Georgia - Russian war.
nationalgeowulf 3 months ago
@drive83 In soviet russia we call red army of soviet russia
TheMarktang 2 months ago
@drive83 exactly :-D and at 0:51 - it is B-52 - not a transport plane
silenykralik 1 month ago
@drive83 its turkie
lordjor82 1 month ago
@drive83 Russia?! no no no. Its Georgia
windson7 1 month ago
amazing israeli technology !!!
americanfirst31 10 months ago 12
@americanfirst31 Fuck Israel, really.
DeliteHayk 2 months ago
@americanfirst31
With the help of American funding, small arms and vehicle technology? Yeah sure... :P
headphones222 2 months ago
@headphones222 Israeli firms are very innovating, small firms in general are more inventive than large firms
VERGIS92 2 months ago
@VERGIS92
I would argue against that point. You can be innovating and invent "something" but unless its affordable and actually makes a real difference then its pointless. Retro fitting a vehicle with armour even if it takes 5 mins is useless because an attack will happen when you dont expect it to.
headphones222 2 months ago
@headphones222 man, Israelis made an aircraft in the 80s, the Lavi, which has all the features that Eurofighter has today, superior stability at take off, hence higher payload capacity, better manuveurability , the Americans had to pay Israel to shut the Lavi project down because it threatened all other aircraft out of the market, both F16 and Mig, you say they are not inventive? they are 20 years ahead of Lockheed and other big firms
VERGIS92 2 months ago
@VERGIS92
Israel owes its existence to the west. End of.
I have a very hard time believing what you're saying just because its not the case lol. Im sorry but they are not 20 years ahead of lockheed martin... Israel is buying the OLD technology of US!
headphones222 1 month ago
@headphones222 is not difficult to beat Lockheed Martin, Or Boeing, Airbus has introduced new innovations to civilan aircraft that Boeing don't have, if you have better engineers you can make something better. The Israeli scientists are among the best in the world, who founded Daussault aerospace in france? who makes the best drones today? who does microprocessor research for Intel?
VERGIS92 1 month ago
@headphones222 and second, the big firms are focused on big projects and maximizing profits, they are interested in making warplanes, tanks, missiles, but the tools used to counter or fake these weapons, such as fake flying missiles is a different country-specific market, small firms can quickly change their products, they use few engineers and have a good full view of what is happening, fake targets is a market we don't even hear about, they can fool any kind of radar
VERGIS92 2 months ago
Nice presentation!..
liranxs 1 year ago