Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obama please help this pathetic lame liberal he's in need of more juice he's Running low on hope. LOL

  • As much as I would like to see President Obama speak with the Senate Republicans I would also like to see him speak with our Democratic house and Senate members. It is wonderful to hear an intelligent man speak.

  • And how his 'no tax increase' promise for anyone making under $250,000? Another big lie.

  • Dang JimmyZ ! you talk about a lame liberal this guy joelwyland is at the top of patheticness ha ha ha

  • Yes, it's very difficult to get liberals like this to admit to even the simplest truths.

  • Don't think we're done talking about reimportation either. Why isn't Obama fighting for his campaign promised reimportation of drugs?

  • Well, I think that's pretty obvious since Congress seems utterly unwilling to pass ANY health care reform he's fighting to get something passed at all. Fighting to add 1 more thing to it isn't going to help pass the legislation that isn't great but at least does include SOME good things.

  • You missed the point again. Obama has caved to the special interests; in this case, Big Pharma. Just one of many promises not kept.

  • No, I didn't. Go search on YouTube for "YouTube Debate: Health Care?" and you'll see Obama during the campaign saying that Pharma and Insurers should have "a seat at the table" in crafting the legislation but not "the ability to buy ALL of the seats at the table."

    It was part of the campaign. The above is what you call "proof." You should try it sometime.

  • Now you are defending lobbying and special interests, who obviously got Obama to go along with them (Big Pharma) in order to PREVENT what Obama promised: Re-importation of prescription drugs.

    (You aren't the first liberal I've had to write stuff 3 or 4 or 5 times to).

  • How about when Obama said during the campaign that he would see to it that we would be able to re-import prescription drugs from Canada, and then, a few months ago after spending time with Big Pharma lobbyists, Mr. Obama needed their support to pass the Senate bill, so he pulled that part out keeping prices high for Americans. That's TWO promises he caved on - reimportation and caving to lobbyists.

  • I want you to take a moment and really listen to what you are saying. Are you saying that the Whitehouse removed something from a Bill that was being created in Congress? The President does not have the power to change Legislation. CONGRESS is the only body that can write law. Congress is the body creating the Health Care Bill. Say it with me, Congress is the body creating the Health Care Bill.

  • The White House insists on many things. You are straying from the topic.

  • Further: Search "Pharma Deal Shuts Down Senate Health Care Debate" & you'll find an article that confirms it was the White House working to crush the reimportation deal - a direct conflict to Obama's campaign promise.

  • Dude, read the article beyond the first two words. CONGRESS shut that amendment down.

  • At the behest of the President OBVIOUSLY. Clearly, you must deny facts to defend the President. The White House fought for that to go away.

  • If the Whitehouse actually had any power over Congress, the Health Care bill would be MUCH better and DONE. So don't try to give me that Obama is pulling Congress' strings as we sit here with no health care reform. I know that the Whitehouse was involved in those talks, but you've got to be out of your mind if you think the Whitehouse is able to control Congress at all.

  • As for lobbyists, absolutely no Administration has had fewer lobbyists and more transparency. They don't hire lobbyists. The only lobbyists in advisory positions are ones who were already in position. The agreement they made was to allow them to stay in place, but when it came time to renew their position, they would be replaced with a non-lobbyist. Only two exceptions to this rule have been made, both publicly announced and discussed.

  • *L* You're excusing Obama caving to lobbyists. He did not just say he would HIRE them, but he would not be lobbied. So it's ok with you if Obama is lobbied to break a promise to the American people.

    You're done.

  • Oh please, the Obama Administration has been the best performance against lobbyists EVER and the only two exceptions to allowing a lobbyist into a position were because they held specific skills that could not be found elsewhere. It wasn't about being lobbied, it was about getting the best person for the job and both were publicly disclosed and discussed. Is THIS tiny sticking point really what you are going to hang your hat on? You won't believe a MOUNTAIN of evidence of his birth, but this?

  • Not so, because lobbyists for Big Pharma got to him - he caved on a promise to allow the reimportation of drugs. So that's ok with you? You have to accept a lot of failed promises to continue to back him.

    Many liberals all over the internet, including the Kos, are very upset with Obama for not fighting for this. Remember, this is HIS bil... why isn't he fighting for it, instead of against it?

    Think.

  • Intelligent? You mean, dishonest.

  • @thejimmyzshow HAHAAHHA!

  • @thejimmyzshow Ok, ok, I think I've stopped laughing long enough to ask... what has he been dishonest about?

  • I would enjoy this if we're going to be civil about it. I don't even want to start if we're going to get into verbal assault. I will present one point at a time - deal?

  • Ok, I'm happy to be civil. Hit me.

  • Mr. Obama has said many many times that the health care plan will allow people to keep their health care plan if they like it. What he does not say is that the health care plan will not allow you to SWITCH from one private plan to another. If you are with Blue Cross, for instance, and you want to leave BC and go with Aetna, you won't be able to. Additionally, if your employer decides to end health benefits, you are also stuck at that point with the feds.

  • Your employer ending your benefits has NOTHING to do with the government. That's something your employer chose to do. Try again.

    I've never heard anything like an inability to switch from one private insurer to another, do you have a reference? Regardless, that doesn't actually contradict the assertion that you can keep your insurance if you want to keep it. So... try again.

  • Except that the government would be telling me I could not go get my own private insurance anymore - I'd be sucked up into the system of federal insurance. Now if you think that Obama is being totally honest here, and that Americans wouldn't be surprised when they tried to switch and were told "no, you have to be in the government's plan now", that's ridiculous. That's not transparency.

  • It's also simply not true. Nothing in the Bills currently on the table prevents anyone from purchasing private health insurance. It's a ridiculous assertion. If it's true, then show me the proof. Give me a reference in either the House or the Senate Bill that would do this. I'll wait.

  • Well, once again, yes, there is a clause in the health care bill that prevents you from switching to another company. Obama also has worked it out so that insurance companies MUST insure people with pre-existing conditions, but there is NO cap on the premiums that companies can charge.

  • Where is the clause? Show me the text, give me a link, give me ANYTHING but ridiculous unfounded claims.

  • Here's Obama saying it himself, his goal (before he was running for President of course)

    watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk

  • When I say If you have your plan and you like it, or you have a doctor and you like your doctor, that you don't have to change plans, the president said after we asked him about this, what I'm saying is the government is not going to make you change plans under health reform. --ABC News (continued)

  • ABC News continued: "Importantly, the government might create circumstances say, a public health care option that is less expensive since profit is not a concern and overhead is lower where you might find your business forcing you into that public plan."

    Search 'President Obama Continues Questionable You Can Keep Your Health Care Promise' with google.

  • YOUR BUSINESS decides to go with the public plan. THE GOVERNMENT did not make that decision. If YOUR BUSINESS decides to switch, then YOUR BUSINESS chose to act, not THE GOVERNMENT.

    You do understand that if YOUR BUSINESS decides to switch from Blue Cross to Aetna, then your coverage moves too? Did THE GOVERNMENT force you to switch to Aetna? No, it's a stupid assertion.

  • Are you purposely avoiding the truth of the matter? What happens if your employer drops health benefits now? You go out and find your own plan. Obama will END that option. Clear enough? You seem unwilling to admit to the truth.

  • Sigh. There is absolutely nothing in the bills that prevent a person from buying private insurance. If your employer drops your benefits you can buy insurance. In fact, the Bills HELP YOU buy insurance because they stop the insurance companies from rejecting you based on a pre-existing condition. Stop repeating a lie. If it's in the Bill then SHOW ME. You can't. It's not there.

  • There is if you leave your current insurer. You would not be able to freely choose one company over another company. If you leave one company you would be forced to the feds. This is what Obama has been looking forward to - I sent you the video.

  • No, that video did not say that at all. That video you sent said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about preventing you from purchasing private insurance. Show me in the Bill. Where is it in the Bill?

  • Oh really? So taking over health insurance and ousting private companies wouldn't prevent you from buying private insurance? You really have to say some amazing things to defend Obama.

  • Oh jesus, the Bill DOES NOT TAKE OVER HEALTH INSURANCE. It doesn't OUST private companies. You're just making shit and listening to the completely unfounded "govt takeover of health care" bullshit that was a lie when it started and is a lie today.

  • It does, Obama just admitted to as much at the GOP meeting you loved so much.

  • What? Are you fucking HIGH? He said exactly the OPPOSITE of that. He told them that they were wrong to characterize the Health Care Reform as a "government take over" and chastised them for making it sound like a "Bolshevik revolution." Dude, what is wrong with you? Are you even really watching this stuff or are you just parroting some one else?

  • Obama's goal has been to make health care a govt run system from the start. If you deny this, you aren't paying attention.

  • Clearly you aren't educated. A Single Payer system is a "government run" system. You can even go and look at this speech to a Joint Session of Congress specifically about health care and he explicitly said that he did not support a Single Payer system. Your statements are in direct contradiction to Obama's own words. His plans through out the campaign were never a Single Payer system.

  • "I happen to be a proponent of single payer..." -- Obama in his own words, thank you very much.

    watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk

  • First, that video is amazingly good at providing no context for all of those statements. Your argument would be better if you could provide more than 3 second clips, especially ones that follow it up with text that lies about what he just said.

    Yes, he personally likes the idea but has never tried to implement it because he knows it's completely impractical because Congress will never pass it. The Public Option is not Single Payer. He never tried to get Congress to do Single Payer.

  • I've dealt with so many people on these types of questions before who start off the way you did and in the end the person just ends up being an insane birther... and birthers are just too ridiculous to respond to with any serious. Hence the laugh. I'm happy to have a real discussion, let's do it.

  • Ok - sidebar - I hate conspiracy theorists, can't stand the truthers, and while I am a right wing conservative Christian 'maniac', I have no patience for the growing militia movement - I can't imagine having those people run around the streets of America anymore than I want any other kind of troops running around. That said, I am fully interested in seeing Obama's birth certificate. We know there's a difference between the Cert of live birth and a birth cert. It's that simple for me.

  • *sigh* No, there is no difference between a Birth Certificate and a Certificate of Live Birth.

  • Well, there is. Have you seen the Cert of Live Birth, on display at various places on the internet?

  • Yes, I have seen Obama's birth certificate on the internet. It has been verified by numerous parties. Do you REALLY believe that Obama was born in Kenya?

  • No, I can tell you honestly I don't know what to believe, and I don't have any idea where he was born. But what you're talking about, calling it a birth certificate, is not honest. The document is called "Certificate of Live Birth." My question is, what was baby Barack's weight and length at birth, and the age of his parents?

  • A Birth Certificate and a Certificate of Live Birth are THE SAME THING. They are two different names for the same thing. Some states call it a Birth Certificate. Some call it a Certificate of Live Birth. It's the same thing.

    His birth certificate has been verified by NUMEROUS third parties and all have found it to be valid. The Hawaii Dept of Health have verified that it is a legit birth certificate. Each state uses a different form. That is the form that Hawaii uses.

  • No, you are misinformed. The Cert of live Birth is a short form Birth Certificate. The fact is that you can't show me on the document you have seen what the baby's length and weight was, or the ages of the parents - typical information on a genuine birth certificate. We also know that many babies from out of the country were given a COLB in Hawaii in 1961, separate from their BCs, and some of those were from out of the country. These are the facts..

  • No, dude, you're just wrong. Read all of the footnote references on wikipedia about Birth Certificates. They have SOURCES for the information. It's the same damn thing. MY birth certificate is a Certificate of Live Birth. You're just making random assertions without any proof. Wild, unfounded speculation is bunk. Show me EVIDENCE. Even Snopes has clips from TWO local newspapers that annoucned Obama's birth on Aug 4th, 1961. TWO separate newspapers.

  • Ok then, show me how much the baby Obama weighed at birth, and the age of his parents. That's the data given on official birth certs. You could not use Obama's Cert of Live Birth in court - it is not complete. And you did not address the fact that some COLB were given to babies born outside of the US.

  • You are simply WRONG and making shit up. His birth certificate is perfectly legal in any court, it has been verified by the Hawaii Depr of Health and MANY other organizations, other people with Hawaiian birth certs look EXACTLY the same, and you've shown nothing but wild speculation without evidence. Got some evidence about birth certs for foreign babies? Do you also realize that Obama could have been born anywhere in the world and still be a Natural Born citizen?

  • Again, the state of Hawaii is not allowing the real birth certificate to be made public. Why, if it was the same document? Hmm?

  • Because it's Hawaiian LAW, genius. Birth Records in Hawaii are not public documents.

  • You just cornered yourself. Check mate.

  • LOL

  • Simple google searches can give you everything I'm writing here. I've grown weary of doing research for Obama defenders online. I just checked, it took me 2 minutes to come up with the information you claim to seek.

  • That's a cop out. If you have a legit source, then provide it. All you've done so far is give wild, unfounded speculation.

  • No, the bottom line is that a Cert of Live Birth is a 'short form' of the birth certificate. Why do you suppose Mr. Obama has spent MILLIONS preventing the public from seeing the real document? Why do you suppose the State of Hawaii defends their policy of keeping private the 'real' birth certificate, if what you said was true? Sorry, what you say does not hold up!

  • That's not the bottom line. You are simply WRONG. The COLB is exactly the same as a Birth Certificate. Show me proof of your statement. Show me a "Birth Certificate" from Hawaii if you're right that they are separate documents. Can you show me that?

    Millions hiding his birth certificate, huh? Show me proof. Show me where and how Obama has spent money hiding this document.

    Why is Hawaii defending their policy? Because in Hawaii birth records are PRIVATE DOCUMENTS. It's the LAW in Hawaii.

  • You deny well known facts. It is well documented that Obama's lawyers are fighting the release of MANY documents - health records, the birth certificate, education records. You can't be this uninformed - wait, maybe you can. You still support Obama.

    Listen carefully: You said they already released the birth cert. Now you say they are right to defend their policy NOT to because it's a private document. This is called "check mate."

  • No, GENIUS, Obama released his Birth Certificate, NOT HAWAII. Hawaiian law states it is a private document and is not given out to the public, which is why HAWAII refuses to provide the document. Obama released the document himself because it was his to release. Damn, you are so incredibly stupid. You swap entities out in the middle of your argument and claim victory. You swap Obama and Hawaii or the Govt and your employer. Your mind is broken.

  • Ok, Mr. Circular Argument Pants: Why then is the state of Hawaii still refusing to release a document supposedly already released? Huh? Hint: You can't extract yourself here. IF what you said were true, HA would say, "It's already been produced". But they are denying access - to a document already produced? Say what?

  • Because it doesn't matter if Obama has released the document, it doesn't change Hawaiian Law, genius.

  • Non-sequitor. According to you, the Hawaii health department is defending it's policy of not releasing a document that... has... already... um, been released? Makes no sense - checkmate.

  • You clearly don't know what the word "checkmate" is because you keep using it incorrectly.

    Hawaii doesn't hand out private documents. That's the LAW. They don't violate the law just because the owner of the document exercised THEIR right to release it. That doesn't change the fact that Hawaii can't release it. The US government isn't just going to freely give me all of your tax returns if you decide to post your tax returns on the web. It's a stupid assertion.

  • @joelwyland Again, why would they fight to keep from saying, "it's already out there?" Dur.

  • because it's the fucking law you moron! Do you really think the US govt is going to hand over your private information to me just because it's already on the internet? NO, because it doesn't matter if YOU release it, the law says THEY cannot release it!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more