Maybe the sound reproduction isn't too good, but Mozart should not be choppy, but very legato with the light staccato in some of the rising figures. This charming little piece is an aria for piano. If you make it sing, it will do Mozart justice. Your love of this music is apparent - keep it up.
no me gustan para nada tus arreglos... realmente en la musica clasica nunca se hacen arreglos como si fuera musica popular te lo digo para que no dañes la musica clasica todo en buena onda... tienes muchas fallas en la interpretacion, intenta escuchar mejor la cancion ademas la mayor parte de la mano izquierda algunos acordes estan mal intenta ver eso... no arregles la cancion a tu gusto, te adelantas mucho en algunas partes... intenta mejorar . saludos
Avoid using the pedal. Key: Practice without the pedal wholie trying to get those keys as leggato and pianissimo. Here in youtube there is and excellent interpretation of this piece by Mitsuko Uchida... breathtaking. The speed is not as important as long as it's beautifly played.
Hm, then I wonder what you say to this short interpretation from a German comedian ( starting after 15 seconds: /watch?v=9-zne-d1HYw ). Do you mind watching it and then telling me your opinion of it :O ?
sorry to constantly be commenting, but an interesting tidbit for those going on about your tempo: the 1,5,3,5 arpeggiation in this is played at the same speed or faster than the first movement allegro 1,5,3,5 arpeggiation.
not bad, lovely piece. needs to be a little faster... keep in mind the arpeggios are 16th notes, that coupled with 3/4 time means you're playing this far too slowly!
dankjewel voor de comment:) en mozart is net als alle muziek uit die tijd zo levendig als je het er zelf van maakt:) ik hoop dat je hem inmiddels goed geleerd hebt?:D
of course it is, 76 beats per minute is 304 16th notes in 60 seconds when a quarter note is 1 beat. this is probably very close to that low end figure. so my other comment is off, it is the right tempo, but it shouldn't be slowed down any.
wow, did you just correct me on the spelling of internet lingo? that like saying it's "owned" not "pwnt". fyi noob only ≈ nub, and they're not even pronounced the same way, nubcake. the only thing i've actually demonstrated so far is that i have an grasp of basic math, unlike the op.
if your musicall skills are even just as good as a fragment of your superior linguistic sarcastical witty reply skills then yes you might even actually stand in the shadow of a musician....if not....go hang yourself with a selfmade rope you poor sad creature..
now take your grubby verbal paws off of my girlfriend.
my musical skills aren't that great. i have no doubts you're technically superior to my own playing. i do, however, find it rather irritating when people can't understand the simple math involved in determining playing speed. i'm glad they don't have to deal with the exponential function for determining pitch... frankly, i don't know why YOU are being such a dick. i actually enjoyed your playing.
mmm...you're not proving to be a man this literate and openminded by giving me a lesson about english/american ways to rape words. Since english is not my mother language, I couldn't give less about this, or about your weird mathematics. I prefer to go back to real mathematics, since I study them.
Rawr, you made my guy pissed >P As I said in the other comment... Have a good life, mate!
so, let me get this straight, using a tempo range, such as 76-108, and then multiplying it by the subdivisions of beats is weird mathematics? i hope you never learn what integration is; that would be witchcraft.
I play this movement with more alberti bass and less melody, and in an andante march mode. Your melodiousness has deafened you to the true melody found throughout the alberti bass!Play it as written with the same magical precision you gave to HAYDN!
Maybe the sound reproduction isn't too good, but Mozart should not be choppy, but very legato with the light staccato in some of the rising figures. This charming little piece is an aria for piano. If you make it sing, it will do Mozart justice. Your love of this music is apparent - keep it up.
thethikboy 8 months ago
no me gustan para nada tus arreglos... realmente en la musica clasica nunca se hacen arreglos como si fuera musica popular te lo digo para que no dañes la musica clasica todo en buena onda... tienes muchas fallas en la interpretacion, intenta escuchar mejor la cancion ademas la mayor parte de la mano izquierda algunos acordes estan mal intenta ver eso... no arregles la cancion a tu gusto, te adelantas mucho en algunas partes... intenta mejorar . saludos
martindap1 8 months ago
but why pedal? a bit fast for a 2nd movement :)
999Arcanine 9 months ago
Fun piece to play... thanx... this has helped....
equineface 2 years ago
Avoid using the pedal. Key: Practice without the pedal wholie trying to get those keys as leggato and pianissimo. Here in youtube there is and excellent interpretation of this piece by Mitsuko Uchida... breathtaking. The speed is not as important as long as it's beautifly played.
davecaputo 4 years ago
bella bella
AminaVane 4 years ago
Mozart didn't write this sonata in this way, none in the world could ever change a note to Mozart... this is unacceptable...
Other than this, it's a good playing.
Peace
Massy
bluebeardit 4 years ago 2
my words ...
bassgall 3 years ago
Hm, then I wonder what you say to this short interpretation from a German comedian ( starting after 15 seconds: /watch?v=9-zne-d1HYw ). Do you mind watching it and then telling me your opinion of it :O ?
MoaiMaea 3 years ago
We clearly heard sublime Mozart in your playing. What else can anyone ask? Thank you.
Frottussle 4 years ago
I think is too fast..Should be slower..bcoz it's andante... Other than this, it's great.
Night4Sakura 4 years ago
Yes, purists are offended.
Mozart's not Chopin or Bach.
jaimeeebc 4 years ago
sorry to constantly be commenting, but an interesting tidbit for those going on about your tempo: the 1,5,3,5 arpeggiation in this is played at the same speed or faster than the first movement allegro 1,5,3,5 arpeggiation.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
not bad, lovely piece. needs to be a little faster... keep in mind the arpeggios are 16th notes, that coupled with 3/4 time means you're playing this far too slowly!
bIuebonics 4 years ago
dankjewel voor de comment:) en mozart is net als alle muziek uit die tijd zo levendig als je het er zelf van maakt:) ik hoop dat je hem inmiddels goed geleerd hebt?:D
beethovenbd 4 years ago
Wow your super talented! I with I could play as well as you xx
vamosnaomi 4 years ago
gosh..thank you very much..I'm glad you enjoyed it xx:D
beethovenbd 4 years ago
It's all wrong, you suck
keppx 5 years ago
thank you for your comment...I hope you can play it better..and offcourse put some evidence of this on youtube?? I'd be delighted..
beethovenbd 4 years ago
I'm sorry for that comment, it has been posted by a friend of mine! (he can play piano very well)
keppx 4 years ago
ow that's quite okay:-)...I reuploaded it youtube. com/watch?v= nOO3gwFbiH4
on another piano...but seriously...I would like to hear him perform it then:)...always nice to learn.
beethovenbd 4 years ago
My piano teacher hit me once for trying to play it so fast... Bravo! I love your interpretation! Mozart would be proud!
FlyBoy7X7 5 years ago
then please do explain in dutch...sinds ik nederlander ben denk ik dat ik de nederlandse uitleg zou moeten kunnen begrijpen:-)
beethovenbd 5 years ago
much to fast, it is andante
Margerelle 5 years ago
it is andante but with 16th notes, do you realize that the time signature represents beats per minute... he's actually playing it a little slow.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
Andante moves from 76-108 it s up to the artist to choose the tempi,look at Mozart sonata k545 in the list of juliusl9
Margerelle 4 years ago
of course it is, 76 beats per minute is 304 16th notes in 60 seconds when a quarter note is 1 beat. this is probably very close to that low end figure. so my other comment is off, it is the right tempo, but it shouldn't be slowed down any.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
you cannot really post a decent comment...you look like some pedant teacher doing like this...and my BBD needs anything but pedant teachers >_>
michighan 4 years ago
...and you can only post semi-coherent comments; do we really need another illiterate nub online?
bIuebonics 4 years ago
mm...first I am a small minded, then an illiterate... you starting to demonstrate to be the one with all those good characteristics, you know?
oh, since you are so literate...it's "noob", not "nub"
sincerily
your illiterate friend
michighan 4 years ago
wow, did you just correct me on the spelling of internet lingo? that like saying it's "owned" not "pwnt". fyi noob only ≈ nub, and they're not even pronounced the same way, nubcake. the only thing i've actually demonstrated so far is that i have an grasp of basic math, unlike the op.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
if your musicall skills are even just as good as a fragment of your superior linguistic sarcastical witty reply skills then yes you might even actually stand in the shadow of a musician....if not....go hang yourself with a selfmade rope you poor sad creature..
now take your grubby verbal paws off of my girlfriend.
beethovenbd 4 years ago
my musical skills aren't that great. i have no doubts you're technically superior to my own playing. i do, however, find it rather irritating when people can't understand the simple math involved in determining playing speed. i'm glad they don't have to deal with the exponential function for determining pitch... frankly, i don't know why YOU are being such a dick. i actually enjoyed your playing.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
mmm...you're not proving to be a man this literate and openminded by giving me a lesson about english/american ways to rape words. Since english is not my mother language, I couldn't give less about this, or about your weird mathematics. I prefer to go back to real mathematics, since I study them.
Rawr, you made my guy pissed >P As I said in the other comment... Have a good life, mate!
michighan 4 years ago
so, let me get this straight, using a tempo range, such as 76-108, and then multiplying it by the subdivisions of beats is weird mathematics? i hope you never learn what integration is; that would be witchcraft.
bIuebonics 4 years ago
I play this movement with more alberti bass and less melody, and in an andante march mode. Your melodiousness has deafened you to the true melody found throughout the alberti bass!Play it as written with the same magical precision you gave to HAYDN!
EITHSNE1 5 years ago
try not to do so many embellishments in a row, some were nice though, nice tempo and great job on the whole . i like this movement too
jairo1412 5 years ago
you're embellishments are soooo wrong!!!!
just kidding ;), it was a very nice interpretation
stalky666 5 years ago
Nice ....
oynasbohol 5 years ago
thank you:-)
beethovenbd 5 years ago
Nice....
oynasbohol 5 years ago
I like this movement better.
badbit 5 years ago
as do I XD
beethovenbd 5 years ago
very nice, you play very well - and thanks for playing the 2nd mouvement, I really hate the 1st :-)
kpunkt 5 years ago
thank you:$:$....well I don't hate the first movement..but I happen to love this movement:P:P
beethovenbd 5 years ago
Again, nice work!
Meowzy 5 years ago