Added: 5 years ago
From: carlosvillalta
Views: 106,875
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • aguante wimax

  • WiMAX consume demasiado espectro electromagnético, no podemos permitirnos el lujo de que cada cual tenga su propio punto de acceso, porque nos quedaríamos sin ancho de banda en 2 días.

    WiMAX ha quedado como una solución para las operadoras que necesitan dar servicio a lugares sin acceso.

  • wich is better for pings ?? this or fibre

  • @mcdudly00 fiber optics...

  • ok, now try it when it snows/rains/is cloudy/over large bodies of water :)

  • Its better to shut up when you dont know what WiMax.

  • This is hollywood propaganda. The fact is that there is a minimum market for Wimax. You can get a good performance in a trial environment, as much as you want. Just use directional antennas and expensive receivers and you get good coverage. The Wimax commercial version tells something different.

  • es igual que las companias de cellulares su senal llega hasta en donde no te imaginas excepto algunas montanas pero eso es inocuo nadie navega en las montanas inavitalbes si eso es wimax te conectaras donde quieras y sera en muchos lugare gratis es lo bueno

  • dice que la senal wimax llega mas lejos que la senal wifi y es en high speed alta velocidad estabilizada nunca baja su velocida dice en el primer test a 10 millas y en el segundo test a mas de 12 millas que se conecta a la red del edificio que senalo primero que tambien habia seanl wimax y wifi la senal wifi en 500 pies perdia senal y la de wimax en millas over 12 miles como dijo el para a mas de 12 millas wimax es la revolucion del futuro en unos 2 anos sera paece standard en su uso normal

  • No tengo ni idea de lo que dice jaja, Amd es el mejor!!

  • serian buenos unos subtitulos en español de los que les puedes agregar aui en youtube actibables/desactivables

  • *wonders what the upload speeds are 10.2 miles away from the Wimax box*

  • Do you know what other countries are pretty advanced in this technology? Thanks

  • I think Tree TopSuzy was right about the video

  • it is good but it is not safe. security is more important for me!!!

  • quasrs says HSDPA and zazkolik says wimax isn't safe... you're both wrong, because wimax is superior in many ways, including security. It's only a matter of time before this is everywhere and traditional ISPs are mostly obsolete.

  • It may not be cheap, but as a city expense it should be well worth it.

  • HSDPA is all ready here, and gives you better value

  • I dont believe at all he is in the locations, except the parking lot and inside that building. When He leaves, you are looking at blue/green screen effects. Look at the shadows behind him from being to close to the screen. Am I the only one who saw that?

  • But the technology is already working in some places in US. It's providing advantage to urban densely poppulated areas with internet speed of more than 6MB/S if you're really interested with the evidence email me. Try and learn about Wimax then you'll understand.

  • lol

    he only had to put a video in the computer, and u think he is an a blue screen...

    ok

    he is just showing you the tech u know...

  • long live to those koreans who made this!!!!!

    (and intel and samsung) =(

  • I heard it will be supported for Nokia N810 (or n830)!!!! :D

  • intel de mierda

  • esta super bueno, mejor que wi-fi, aunque estas dos podrian ser complemento una de la otra.

  • Yes, u have to buy a Wimax CPE. later there will be Wi-fi/Wimax CPE's. but for now you need the 2, because they work on different frequencies.

  • I've go a laptop with standard wi-fi

    1 ) Do I need to buy a new peach of equipment to log in wimax ?

    2 ) Could I log in with the Wimax modem into a old Wi-Fi hot spot ?

  • 1) Yes. And, nowadays, it's not cheap. The base station it's not at a price for private usage.

    2) No. But, for instance, in laptops, Wi-Fi won't disapear when WiMAX starts to appear in that devices.

    Don't worry about client access to WiMAX. The technology it's still being investigated and will probably be used, for now, as backbone of Wi-Fi connections and rural access.

  • "but people are goin to have to pay for this,tust me it wont be free"

    Of course is not going to be free, doh! who doesn't pay for a T1 connection or a Wi-Fi connection? there are SOME free places but it's not as personal as wimax

  • but people are goin to have to pay for this,tust me it wont be free

  • this technology is going to be a big step in wireless internet communicaion

  • its already 2007 ....where damn wimac at ?

  • uyyyyyy. pos si esto esta super chidisisimo!!!!!!! jajaja a

  • it's been 4 yrs since, and they don't have a proper chip working wimax yet... it's not as easy as they thought...

  • Er... thats an incredibly wrong statement.

  • wimax is really what people need in rural areas, if not wimax there's got to be some improving, only 10% of the world's population has internet access, i hope they improve in few years

  • çok kısa süre sonra çorlu da aktif olacak sistem :) beleş internet gelio

  • your right!

  • wimax haramdır. o yüzden türkiyeye gelmiyor. adsl ise helaldir. güvenle kullanabilirsiniz.

  • sen ne anlarsın liberarleşememiş halili at artık görüyoruz senin adls sen bu at gözlügünle daha cokk gidersin

  • mükemmel birşey bu teknoloji ben bu teknbolojiyi artık Türkiye'dede görmek istiyorum

  • konusma lan

    guzelim turk telekomumuzun guzelim adsli var napacan wimaxi

  • beğenmiyorsan kullanmazsın amk sanane

  • Wimax is losing to EVD0 standards from Qualcomm ..

  • hahaha

  • The current standard is updated for NLOS operation (2-11GHz) and 5 miles of coverage seems possible with that. By using some simple relay stations this coverage can be improved.

  • Just because it says "nothing was simulated" doesn't mean a British guy and a lack of all evidence in it's entirety is getting me to buy this load of crap.

  • im sure that sucker will cost a ton.

  • It's impressive untill he says he used a 'line of site antenna'. The world record for using a standard, off-the shelf Wireless G router was 125 miles by using an LOS antenna... Normally that router might get 125 feet of usable range. So if his WiMax was about 12 miles with an LOS antenna, what does it get without the LOS antenna? A room's-width?

  • bong!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more