Sam Husseini Quesions House Democratic Leader Pelosi on WMD

[HotaruZoku]

I agree, Madam Speaker.

The point is, is there an imminent threat to the united states.

Yes. It's the one dodging questions.

[XpresloX]

This Bitch supported bush and now she tried to deny

[ages24]

What a 2 face Bitch!!

[lawlessinc]

That bitch has got to go. She still did not answer the question.

[BeantownJim]

congress is up in 2010

[jettbugg]

Ms Pelosi is NOT a good example of a great leader....BUT a great example of a liar and incompitant person

[IntellectualAddict]

Sshhhhh!!! You're not supposed to question Liberals!!

If they say "there is no question about" something, then that's code for "don't ask me any questions."

Just ask Al Gore.

[HotaruZoku]

@IntellectualAddict I would, but I cant.

"There's no question about there being no question."

[TheodoresWorld]

Thank you so much for this video.

[genehilbert]

The fact that anyone believes anything this hypocrite says simply amazes me.

[ladydi5319]

Apparently there are enough people who do beleive this hypocrite and other hypocrites because she, like Kennedy, Reid, Boxer, Feinstein...an on and on (coincidence they are all liberal democrats?) all keep getting re-elected.

[HotaruZoku]

@genehilbert Pause the video inside the last second.

Check that expression out.

Tell me the woman isn't certain she deserves a crown.

[johnsreport]

Just today Grandma Nancy Pelosi said that around the time of water-boarding she was busy battling a Bush administration that was "misleading the American people about the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The deception continues from this strange group of messias.

johnsreport(com)

[Vikingwolfe]

oops.... too late, Speaker Pelosi and the rest of the cronies in the Democratic Party have just decimated the housing market and made it nearly impossible for "responsible Americans" to work under the current economic situation... what does this have to do with her answer to the above video... she doesnt have a clue as to what she perceives as fact and how to react to that information, let alone make an intelligent decision for the good of this Nation.

[mannyfiu1212]

pelosi sucks... she is a shame to her party.

[hsgbfjar]

It's a Fresh Prince moment! See what ha happened was...

[ruth7919]

lol lie bitch lie

[ruth7919]

lol you stupid bitch.... lie lie lie

[mike1111qq]

lie bitch lie

[Tank611]

Pelosi lied when she said Saddam had WMD and she lied in this video when she said she didn't really mean Iraq had WMD.

Definition of obfuscation:

'To make so confused or opaque as to be difficult to perceive or understand'

[dloverise]

in short:

lying bitch

[oldjoe5]

Pelosi is a wholly owned subsidiary of AIPAC

[trink968]

damn i despise this maggot of a woman.she is so fake and such a fraud!probablly the WORST speaker in history of the house.

[wwwPNACATTACKcom]

Look how Pelosi starts to shake :D

[usus53]

Gee, lt5 and his aliases telengard and anas53 talking to himself about me...for a whole page.

Impressive! And oh so persuasive.

Some days I think you're working for me you little DOD employees.

Keep up the incompetent work! Carry on.

[It5Iee]

Fuck you USUS53! You think you're so smart. Fuck you! You put us down because we don't use facts and we're a little bit gay. So what! I thought all you liberals loved gays!

[wwwPNACATTACKcom]

moron

[telengardc64]

The spammer has left. He is a liberal corporate pig who has everything to gain from eco-friendly government programs.

[telengardc64]

Search for "A Time For Choosing" and hear Ronnie's words from 1964 superimposed over the events of today. Prophetic and still factual.

[telengardc64]

The Dem's stammer and stutter when they are confronted with their statements before and shortly after the war. They change their opinions and stances based on the latest polls and hope the past remains forgotten. Keep exposing these frauds !!!!!

[telengardc64]

This guy is part of a company that benefits from eco-friendly tech.  Usus53,oilegionare,downwithcli­nton- all one in the same spammer. Now he is using my name as well with a q instead of a g. He is all over Youtube spamming his crap in the warped belief he will profit from it.

[anas53SlurpsBushCum]

(i)t5lee

Joined: May 24, 2007

Last Login: 1 hour ago

Videos Watched: 32

usus53 just never gives up lying and impersonating people. I think this user name says it all.

[It5lee]

Oh Jeez, what am I saying. OMG I'm fucked now. Shit! I'm not really gay, I mean...I experiment but we all experiment right? I do like stiffy cloacal action, but who doesn't, right?

Of god I'm one fucked up neocon propagandist.

[It5lee]

Fuck you OIL! Your usus53 too aren't you! Fucking liberal spammer! You're ALL SPAMMERS!! FUCK ALL OF YOU!!

And so what if I'm gay, what the fuck should you care? Do you want some of me? Huh, is that it? You want to hammer me from behind? Is that what you want. Then who'd be gay. Answer me that, faggot!

[It5lee]

Going back to the oldest poster - Confusedlcky. Are you the oldest usus? I think you are you muthafucka!

You want proof of WMDs? I gave you proof 4 months ago you evolved monkey abortionist!

Fuck all of you!!

[It5lee]

You fucking idiot usus58!! You are the one that bumfucked me at the neocon social last month and I never got your number.

Please, please, please email me.

[telenqardc64]

It sure is noce isn't it Lt5lee. In this age of instant disinformation, the neocons (rovians) get away with murder and then lie through their teeth when confronted with their lies. Listen to Cheney when he's asked what branch of government he's in, or did he shoot a constituent, or does he have Halliburton stock.

We are a culture of liars.

[OILegionnaire]

You now seem to be repeating yourself lt5lee.

You're a spammer.

You're a neocon.

Your tactics are lies followed by profanity instead of fact.

Based on some of your weird posts, you're gay.

And to top it all off, you're paid to propagandize You Tube.

Who is paying you?

[lt5Iee]

Fuck you OIL! Your usus53 too aren't you! Fucking liberal spammer! You're ALL SPAMMERS!! FUCK ALL OF YOU!!

And so what if I'm gay, what the fuck should you care? Do you want some of me? Huh, is that it? You want to hammer me from behind? Is that what you want. Then who'd be gay. Answer me that, faggot!

[lt5Iee]

So what if I'm a faggot.  I was born that way. Being gay has nothing to do with being a paid neocon propagandist anyway.

What's your problem, fucking liberal terrorists!!

[Iudocrat]

It only matters that your a faggot because you keep bringing it up Lt5Lee. You keep soliciting at political sites like you're some kind of gay political whore.

what does it feel like to have bush's come dripping down your leg...figuratively speaking?

[lt5Iee]

Fuck you ludocrat! No one but you says I'm gay. I'm sick of it even being an issue. What kind of fucking liberals are you all? I thought fucking leftist socialist libs like the gays.

Welll then...fuck all of you!

[Aerit98]

Oh my.

Look at the pathetic neocon spammer Lt5Lee.

Look at how many posts he has here and other sites.

Q: What does he do for a living? A: posts bullshit.

Q: What does he do for fun? A: Goes down on liberals - he's a flaming conflicted gay with anal and oral issues.

[bushitman]

Neocon-Rove strategy: Take out of context quotes, use them against Democrats to take FOCUS off of Bush Administration Role pushing for Iraq Invasion.

Only Lt5Lee is fooled by this ploy as evidenced by his 19 Posts in last 18 hours.

Also corroboration of Aerit's accusation that Lt5Lee is a paid propagandist. Who else has that kind of time to devote to this site?

[Aerit98]

Oh my.

Look at the pathetic neocon spammer Lt5Lee.

Look at how many posts he has here and other sites.

Q: What does he do for a living? A: posts bullshit.

Q: What does he do for fun? A: Goes down on liberals - he's a flaming conflicted gay with anal and oral issues.

[KroveDC]

Smashing Lt5Lee! You've FOUND THE EVIDENCE!! Excellent. But where is it? I don't see it? I wonder why Lt5Lee isn't rushing to show us. Oh, is this like all the other times you claimed you had evidence.

lt5lee - paid neocon spammer/propagandist.

All claims, no proofs.

Karl Rove

Washingtion DC

[downwithcIinton]

Goddamit Lt5Lee - I'm tired of you advertising our private lives. What we do in the privacy of various white house enclaves is the business of the Rovians.

Get a grip and ease up on the oxycontin.

[lt5Iee]

And I should know GAY!! Right Downwithclinton? in classic Cohen-conservative gay style, the Rovian wing of the Republican party loves to dress up & exchange manly fluids in our spare time.

A few of my other names are...ODELLLEOS, ttm8u, ekim53, ubershade, lrgpp, prrolg.

Because I'm such a flaming fag neocon asshole, I've been banned by dougzilla, lanedek, hategun and WatchWithIceMaiden.

Check out their vids...you won't see me there.

[downwithcIinton]

Yea tlm, if you aren't one of the ARMY of the anti-neocons, you're replying to a impersonator. His SELLING is difernt than mind.

Oh, BTW - My Liberal Liar List are all those names that DISAGREE with ME!! I hate that!!

Also, I copied his alleged tactics and included my own (usus58, krove1, neoKondscious, bush1tman...very clever of me).

[It5lee]

The ones you see squirming more than anyone are the bushies. Cheney claiming a 4th branch of congress, Bush thinking he's king.

Lugar recently coming out AGAINST Bush's direction in the war.

[tIm8u]

Actually the IAEA was rightfully dubious about false UK intel designed to discredit Saddam. Upon investigating claims that Saddam tried to purchase Uranium, it was discovered an Iraqi business contingent visited Niger but uranium was never discussed. Since a French consortium oversees all transactions - there was never any threat of a sale.

[tIm8u]

Yeah, the bushies got the wool pulled over their eyes again.

Incompetence is in full display every time the bushies try to pull a fast one.

Even a 3rd world power like Russia can make Bush look stupid.

[telengardc64]

In this age of instant information the lib's sqirm when confronted with their lies. Listen to Pelosi try and spin out of the question :)

[It5lee]

Note also, I'll claim the IAEA says things without any specific references. I'm particularly fond of making unverifiabel assertions. I also like to speculate because I figure that everyone is curious about what an interesting person like myself thinks.

[It5lee]

Wow, I never thought I would quote (actually misquote) the IAEA or Wiki (that liberal piece of shit) but I blacked out last night and awoke this morning smelling of linseed oil, with avocado dip in all my orifices.

Just thought every one should know that I like to spam these sites with multiple posts, half truths and occassional personal information.

[tIm8u]

You call WIKI liberal because it doesn't spin things right.

WIKI is all fully sourced factual documentation. No wonder right wing propagandists like the gay neocon Lt5lee hate it.

Who gave Lt5 the truth serum?

[XianSlader]

Yevgeny Primakov ran Saddam's weapons programs in the late 1970s. After that he was promoted to head of the Soviet foreign intelligence service in 1990, to Russia's minister of foreign affairs in 1996, & in 1998, to prime minister. Privately, Primakov hates Israel & has always championed Arab radicalism.) probably provided Saddam's 50 MIG fighters the Brits found hidden in the desert. That's WMD enough for me. Russians could have sold Saddam a nuke when his offer got high enough...

[XianSlader]

These Russians probably provided Saddam's 50 MIG fighters the Brits found hidden in the desert. That's WMD enough for me. Russians could have sold Saddam a nuke when his offer got high enough...

[XianSlader]

KUDOS,brother! This lady really stirred you up with her lies and half-truths. Apparently you didn't buy into the phony Russian "coup" either. News sources reveal that perhaps THREE Russians died who had not been in on the "Soviet Union Is Dead" Joke on the West. Russian motto (Communist) is 2 steps forward and ONE step back! The foreign aid has poured into Russia since 1989.

[XianSlader]

Polosi is such a smart lady...not only would Saddam Hussein use chemical/biological weapons...Saddam would have PAID MILLION$ for a stolen atomic bomb and more to smuggle it into POLOSI's city just to show her how smart she REALLY is...

[ConfusedIcky]

Really sorry, man, but I'm not listening to Christopher Hitchens. Not a very reliable source, you see.

[ConfusedIcky]

You obviously have your own theories, but U.S. policy should not be determined by your "bets". Invading Iraq in 2003 was not necessary for our security.

[ConfusedIcky]

Well, I respect very much your search for truth, but all arguments I've ever heard about Iraq really having WMDs are never able to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

[lt5Iee]

Going back to the oldest poster - Confusedlcky. Are you the oldest usus? I think you are you muthafucka!

You want proof of WMDs? I gave you proof 4 months ago you evolved monkey abortionist!

Fuck all of you!!

[ConfusedIcky]

You can show me clips of Clinton, Pelosi, Kerry, etc., talking about Iraq and WMDs all you want, but the fact of the matter is that none of those people believed Iraq to be such a threat that it needed to be invaded until GWB started squawking. Without the Bush administration's rhetoric, Iraq never would have been invaded.

[ConfusedIcky]

Oh yes ... because Newsmax, Frontpagemag and ChronWatch are always right, completely reliable AND peer-reviewed. I'll hop right over there and believe everything they have to report.

They are websites after all, and any source ending in ".com" is always true and will stand up as evidence in a court of law.

[ConfusedIcky]

The fact that you actually believe "he" (meaning GWB, I assume) might have be right about Iraqi WMDs just proves to me that you are the one who's delusional.

And you cannot convince me that I had the opinion that Iraq was a threat to the US before GWB started squawking about it. You can't convince me that members of Congress or Bill Clinton thought Iraq was such a threat that it needed to be invaded. Therefore, it was NOT the shared opinion of everybody.

[ConfusedIcky]

It was not the shared opinion of everybody. No one even thought of Iraq as such a concern as we took it until the Bush administration started pushing in that direction. The people who sent us to war with Iraq in 2003 are fear mongerering, Machivellian liars. If GWB weren't POTUS, we never would of went to war with Iraq. All the carnage there now is his fault and the fault of his administration.

[ConfusedIcky]

You're spinning the issue onto Saddam's intentions. That doesn't matter. Iraq was not a threat to the U.S., let alone a nuclear threat, that would call for a military invasion of that country.

[ConfusedIcky]

it5lee wrote: "No, they told us what they knew that was unclassified. No lies."

Look, I was lied to. I was deliberately misled. I was misled on an issue of going to war. WAR!

[ConfusedIcky]

I repeat. Yes, it is hard to believe even WITH the forged UK docs that Iraq bought uranium from Niger. It is especially hard to believe when the US is trying to use such info as a justificiation for an invasion.

Bush and his supporters are either liars or really incompotent since it's now known that there wasn't any Iraqi nuke threat whatsoever.

[ConfusedIcky]

cont.

I never believed Iraq was a nuke threat, and I'm not even the President. The President should of at least been as smart as me, but apparently that's too much to ask.

[ConfusedIcky]

It is a lie to say that Iraq bought uranium ore sometime in recent memory. If you recall, Iraq did have a nuke program decades ago, but it was thought done away with when Israel bombed Iraq in 1981.

And I know all about AQ Khan and Libya. Neither of those examples justified invading Iraq in 2003 though.

Face it. Bush is culpable for what is tantamount to lying. I wish he and his supporters could take responsiblility, but they seem unable to do that.

[ConfusedIcky]

The threat of a mushroom cloud was never a justification for a military invasion during the Cold War or after the Cold War, up until Bush decided to invade Iraq.

It rises to the level of lying to say: "this one particular country (Iraq) was rumored to be buying yellowcake a long time ago, and therefore if we don't invade them now, we're going to get nuked."

[ConfusedIcky]

I've already said that exaggerrating a threat is an abhorrent way of misleading, and the Bush administration is certainly culpable.

As for as your criteria, I'm going to say Bush during the 2003 State of the Union when he said Iraq had sought "significant quantities of uranium from Africa".

Or how about Condoleezza and Cheney saying that a smoking gun would be a mushroom cloud?

[ConfusedIcky]

It's immoral to scare people into doing things they don't want to do. That's what the Bush adminsitration did in roughly 2002-2003, when they were making the case for war in Iraq.

[ConfusedIcky]

I can. The spreading of untruths about Iraq around the years 02-03 was meant, by the Bush adm, as a way of getting ppl who would not normally support going to war to actually support it. IOW, Bush and his cronies tried to scare people into doing something they find morally reprehensible.

[ConfusedIcky]

Even if true, that still doesn't take away the fact that GWB and his administration deliberately spread untruths about war, a matter of extreme importance.

[ConfusedIcky]

I think Pelosi handled herself fairly well. She could have answered the question better, but the question was negatively insinuating, so it's no biggie that she may have gotten a little flustered.