Added: 5 years ago
From: BI30
Views: 16,335
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.

    Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.

    The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.

  • @MichaelKeating2001 I never attacked you. My criticism of Bush is no more "personal" than your criticism of Clinton.

    I love it when people who were either children (or not even born yet) try to tell me what Clinton did or did not do. You stupidly claimed Clinton "did NOTHING to stop another attack" after 1993. Please remind me the next time America was attacked after '93. If Clinton "did nothing", then he must have been incredibly lucky.

  • Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.

    Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.

    The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.

  • You guys bashing Bush are hilarious.

    Who was President on Feb 26, 1993 when AQ first attacked the WTC? What was done after that to stop future attacks? Nothing. Having Bin Laden handed to him on a silver platter, Bill Clinton decided he should not take him out. Clinton ignored AQ for seven years, Bush ignored them for seven months.

  • @MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.

    You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S. on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.

  • @MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.

    You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.

  • Condi Rice had CIA briefings about the al Qaeda threat 5/30 and 7/10/01. Cofer Black said "We did everything but pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to her head." For info on Condi's testimony to the 9/11 Commission, see my video "Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9/11 Widows"

  • When the Aug.6th 2001 PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) titled: "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." was presented to Bush. George told the CIA briefer: "All right. You've covered your ass now." (and then Bush went on vacation for a month)

  • Comment removed

  • lol What's your point? That anyone who doesn't believe in your God is a heathen? Hmm, interesting, that's what Al Qeada think as well.

  • the pope is the "president" of the catholic church....and all those priests have done things to little boys.

  • secret homosexuals lied about being holy men so they could get at children-those men should have been hanged-this shows why homosexuaks should never be scout masters or be allowed to adopt children-pope is not president-richard clarke was a dupe of chilton and should have been fired the day Bush took office-where was he and his advice to clinton after countless attacks?-911 was plotted for 5 years under clinton and they expected gore to win election-if gore had won,we would have had more attacks

  • not my problem...it is the church...

  • dis dude is smert  we nead mo peepel lik him we shood mak a stachoo fer em

  • Governments and Secret Services are the Terrorists.

  • One: No terrorist attack on U.S. soil for eight years until Bush took office and ignored him.

    Two: Google "Project Bojinka".

  • that's a convenient counting. What did Clark and Clinton do during 8 years against Saddam Hussein or Bin Laden? Nothing. They slept. Terrorism was everywhere, US interests were attacked, but Clinton spent his time having a blowjob. And now, they are making lessons? That's almost comical.

  • Then I also recommend you Google: '"Wag the Dog" Osama'.

  • Custer that is a real poor history lesson there. There was nothing essential to do about Saddam - he was a trapped and broken dictator. Osama? Until 9/11 Osama did small terrorist acts and no-one including the right, supported action greater than what was done. If you recall when clinton did act, cries of wag the dog came from the right. Bush didn't recognize terror - he campaigned on star wars - hardly an anti terror program.

  • Hey, custerdivision, who had control of Congress for seven of those eight years? The Republicans did, and they fought and sabotaged just about every one of Clinton's anti-terror efforts. Than right after 9/11 they try to revise history to make it look like Clinton was the one to blame.

    The Republicans were the ones who were more concerned about Clinton's blowjob than terrorism.

  • I know. All this "democrats are soft on terrorism..." Bogus. Clinton had the most comprehensive counter-terrorism program of any other president. Republicans criticised him for being "obsessed with bin Laden." What a bunch of hypocrites.

    They don't even distort facts. They just make them up. Or completely ignore them.

  • SCOTTY-all the repuiblicans could have done is cut funding-even the biggest democrat hack has never claimed republicans want to cut funding for military or anti-terror funds-clinton was impeached cause he offered favors to others to lie and threats to those who would not-guess you think when women are raped or bring sexual harashment charges,its about sex?it was 6 years not seven republicans controlled house-congress has 2 year terms dumbass

  • You have no answer to BI30 do you custer? Why didn't Bush have any plans on terror prior to 9/11? Why did he not mention terror as a threat during his campaign for presidency?

  • Everything you need to know about GWB's idea of what the most important security issue would be under his Admin is revealed in the fact he chose a professor of Russian Studies fluent in Russian to be his "National Security Advisor" (Condi Rice), despite attacks on the Kobai Towers, the American Embassies in Africa, and the attack on the Cole (in addition to warning from Clark & Berger).

  • Nice job BI30. It's unbelievable that GWB had such little regard for terrorism. His failure to act in any way after receiving the warning "Osama determined to strike in the US" galvanizes the fact that he wasn't concerned at all with terrorist groups prior to 9/11.

  • if u read the 9/11 commission, he didn't ever read daily briefings like Clinton did, he had people read them for him and tell him if anything mattered

  • See: The Neocons - Ideology and Fantasy

  • Question asked, question answered.

  • Quick correction: Clinton did NOT have "ten high-probability chances" to get OBL. He had *one*, which he took and missed him by just one hour. And when he took it, the Republican Congress screamed "Wag the Dog! Wag the Dog!"

  • Finally, someone else brings up that the republicans went after Clinton when he tried to deal with Bin Laden. Thank you!

  • Cheney, Wolfowitz and Co. are all TRUE terrorists!

  • This guy's good for a laugh

  • Do you mean Richard Clarke? Do you even know who he is?

  • and thats about all i have to say about that

  • Clinton maybe had the chance to get OBL...but it was not he who hijacked the airplanes...It was men who was living here who did it. Our goverment had chance to stop 9/11.

  • Scheuer was never a field agent, a known partisan, and has publicly contradicted his own accusations in separate interviews. He was referred to as "Mike" in the "9/11 Commission's Report" in Chapter 4. They do not report any such pattern of criticism of Clinton by him.

    NeoCons are still desperate, even six years later, to blame Clinton for Bush's failure. Sad.

  • so true, honestly the fact Scheuer doesn't even give his name in the report says it all

  • 6 to 8 months in office after recountmess and Bush still had alot of Clintons left over appointee's in the administration and an information road block between FBI and CIA that was put in place by Clinton that impeeded information sharing between the two departments.Six months in office making sense of Clinton's mess and getting oriented.? Hey have you ever heard of Jamie Gurelic(sp.?)Clark is trying to salvage his reputation as well by Trashing Bush. Liberal media carries his water !

  • The only Clinton holdovers in the Bush Admin were Clarke and Tennet, and George gave Tennet "the Medal of Freedom". The bi-partisan "9/11 Commission" debunked the "Gorlick/wall" assertion as total nonsense.

  • yea when the intelligence report which was directly made only for bush said Osama Bin Laden may use passenger airplanes to atk the U.S. which bush most likely didn't look at, & if he did jesus christ how stupid do you have to be to not see the clear signs.

  • notice how the peddler of that myth Kurt Weldon lost reelection in a landslide.

  • This guy was the reason 9/11 happened not Bush!

  • Because it was Clarke that refused to discuss Terrorism until September 1st, it was Clarke that dismissed the August 6th PDB, and it was Clarke that never responded to the USS Cole bombing, right?

  • wrong...the CIA and FBI didn't want to do anything about it, it was not Clarke's fault...Clarke is a million times more competent than Bush

  • I remember this interview. At the time I still didn't know about the "9/11 Truth Movement". Now it sounds like the whole Clarke thing, absent of the real truth, was just a diversionary, no worries, we're competently checkin n balancin ourselves here, bone for the media to spin on us.

  • Google "9/11 Truth Movement". It is a shame that Clarke was forbidden to answer this question more candidly for fear of being covertly snuffed. Hero? Coward? We'll find out soon enough.

  • Damn right.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more