Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.
Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.
The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.
@MichaelKeating2001 I never attacked you. My criticism of Bush is no more "personal" than your criticism of Clinton.
I love it when people who were either children (or not even born yet) try to tell me what Clinton did or did not do. You stupidly claimed Clinton "did NOTHING to stop another attack" after 1993. Please remind me the next time America was attacked after '93. If Clinton "did nothing", then he must have been incredibly lucky.
Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.
Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.
The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.
Who was President on Feb 26, 1993 when AQ first attacked the WTC? What was done after that to stop future attacks? Nothing. Having Bin Laden handed to him on a silver platter, Bill Clinton decided he should not take him out. Clinton ignored AQ for seven years, Bush ignored them for seven months.
@MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.
You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S. on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.
@MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.
You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.
Condi Rice had CIA briefings about the al Qaeda threat 5/30 and 7/10/01. Cofer Black said "We did everything but pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to her head." For info on Condi's testimony to the 9/11 Commission, see my video "Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9/11 Widows"
When the Aug.6th 2001 PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) titled: "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." was presented to Bush. George told the CIA briefer: "All right. You've covered your ass now." (and then Bush went on vacation for a month)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This clod was on bill maher when bill and atheist made fun of religion(clark laughed also)-then clarke yukked it up when maher called pope a pedophile,etc
secret homosexuals lied about being holy men so they could get at children-those men should have been hanged-this shows why homosexuaks should never be scout masters or be allowed to adopt children-pope is not president-richard clarke was a dupe of chilton and should have been fired the day Bush took office-where was he and his advice to clinton after countless attacks?-911 was plotted for 5 years under clinton and they expected gore to win election-if gore had won,we would have had more attacks
that's a convenient counting. What did Clark and Clinton do during 8 years against Saddam Hussein or Bin Laden? Nothing. They slept. Terrorism was everywhere, US interests were attacked, but Clinton spent his time having a blowjob. And now, they are making lessons? That's almost comical.
Custer that is a real poor history lesson there. There was nothing essential to do about Saddam - he was a trapped and broken dictator. Osama? Until 9/11 Osama did small terrorist acts and no-one including the right, supported action greater than what was done. If you recall when clinton did act, cries of wag the dog came from the right. Bush didn't recognize terror - he campaigned on star wars - hardly an anti terror program.
Hey, custerdivision, who had control of Congress for seven of those eight years? The Republicans did, and they fought and sabotaged just about every one of Clinton's anti-terror efforts. Than right after 9/11 they try to revise history to make it look like Clinton was the one to blame.
The Republicans were the ones who were more concerned about Clinton's blowjob than terrorism.
I know. All this "democrats are soft on terrorism..." Bogus. Clinton had the most comprehensive counter-terrorism program of any other president. Republicans criticised him for being "obsessed with bin Laden." What a bunch of hypocrites.
They don't even distort facts. They just make them up. Or completely ignore them.
SCOTTY-all the repuiblicans could have done is cut funding-even the biggest democrat hack has never claimed republicans want to cut funding for military or anti-terror funds-clinton was impeached cause he offered favors to others to lie and threats to those who would not-guess you think when women are raped or bring sexual harashment charges,its about sex?it was 6 years not seven republicans controlled house-congress has 2 year terms dumbass
You have no answer to BI30 do you custer? Why didn't Bush have any plans on terror prior to 9/11? Why did he not mention terror as a threat during his campaign for presidency?
Everything you need to know about GWB's idea of what the most important security issue would be under his Admin is revealed in the fact he chose a professor of Russian Studies fluent in Russian to be his "National Security Advisor" (Condi Rice), despite attacks on the Kobai Towers, the American Embassies in Africa, and the attack on the Cole (in addition to warning from Clark & Berger).
Nice job BI30. It's unbelievable that GWB had such little regard for terrorism. His failure to act in any way after receiving the warning "Osama determined to strike in the US" galvanizes the fact that he wasn't concerned at all with terrorist groups prior to 9/11.
if u read the 9/11 commission, he didn't ever read daily briefings like Clinton did, he had people read them for him and tell him if anything mattered
Quick correction: Clinton did NOT have "ten high-probability chances" to get OBL. He had *one*, which he took and missed him by just one hour. And when he took it, the Republican Congress screamed "Wag the Dog! Wag the Dog!"
Clinton maybe had the chance to get OBL...but it was not he who hijacked the airplanes...It was men who was living here who did it. Our goverment had chance to stop 9/11.
Scheuer was never a field agent, a known partisan, and has publicly contradicted his own accusations in separate interviews. He was referred to as "Mike" in the "9/11 Commission's Report" in Chapter 4. They do not report any such pattern of criticism of Clinton by him.
NeoCons are still desperate, even six years later, to blame Clinton for Bush's failure. Sad.
6 to 8 months in office after recountmess and Bush still had alot of Clintons left over appointee's in the administration and an information road block between FBI and CIA that was put in place by Clinton that impeeded information sharing between the two departments.Six months in office making sense of Clinton's mess and getting oriented.? Hey have you ever heard of Jamie Gurelic(sp.?)Clark is trying to salvage his reputation as well by Trashing Bush. Liberal media carries his water !
The only Clinton holdovers in the Bush Admin were Clarke and Tennet, and George gave Tennet "the Medal of Freedom". The bi-partisan "9/11 Commission" debunked the "Gorlick/wall" assertion as total nonsense.
yea when the intelligence report which was directly made only for bush said Osama Bin Laden may use passenger airplanes to atk the U.S. which bush most likely didn't look at, & if he did jesus christ how stupid do you have to be to not see the clear signs.
Because it was Clarke that refused to discuss Terrorism until September 1st, it was Clarke that dismissed the August 6th PDB, and it was Clarke that never responded to the USS Cole bombing, right?
I remember this interview. At the time I still didn't know about the "9/11 Truth Movement". Now it sounds like the whole Clarke thing, absent of the real truth, was just a diversionary, no worries, we're competently checkin n balancin ourselves here, bone for the media to spin on us.
Google "9/11 Truth Movement". It is a shame that Clarke was forbidden to answer this question more candidly for fear of being covertly snuffed. Hero? Coward? We'll find out soon enough.
Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.
Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.
The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.
MichaelKeating2001 4 months ago
@MichaelKeating2001 I never attacked you. My criticism of Bush is no more "personal" than your criticism of Clinton.
I love it when people who were either children (or not even born yet) try to tell me what Clinton did or did not do. You stupidly claimed Clinton "did NOTHING to stop another attack" after 1993. Please remind me the next time America was attacked after '93. If Clinton "did nothing", then he must have been incredibly lucky.
BI30 4 months ago
Nice liberal personal attack on someone you disagree with - all too typical.
Clinton's people treated it like a law enforcement issue. Those who were arrested repeatedly said they would be back to finish the job, and Clinton ignored it until it became helpful to bomb an aspirin factory to deflect from Lewinsky. 90% of the 9/11 planning was on Clinton's watch.
The Bush administration clearly dropped the ball in places also, but the 9/11 commission report squarely placed the fault on both teams.
MichaelKeating2001 4 months ago
You guys bashing Bush are hilarious.
Who was President on Feb 26, 1993 when AQ first attacked the WTC? What was done after that to stop future attacks? Nothing. Having Bin Laden handed to him on a silver platter, Bill Clinton decided he should not take him out. Clinton ignored AQ for seven years, Bush ignored them for seven months.
MichaelKeating2001 4 months ago
@MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.
You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S. on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.
BI30 4 months ago
@MichaelKeating2001 Off the top of my head, he didn't sit motionless in a classroom for seven minutes and he didn't blame HW Bush for failing to prevent an attack that took place when Clinton had only been in office for less than a month.
You were probably still in Kindergarten, so here's a refresher: Clinton GOT the guy (Abdel-Rahman, "The Blind Sheik"), PUT HIM ON TRIAL *IN* NYC, threw his butt in prison, and prevented another attack on the U.S on his watch til Bush dropped the ball on 9/11.
BI30 4 months ago
Condi Rice had CIA briefings about the al Qaeda threat 5/30 and 7/10/01. Cofer Black said "We did everything but pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to her head." For info on Condi's testimony to the 9/11 Commission, see my video "Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9/11 Widows"
punxsutawneybarney 10 months ago
When the Aug.6th 2001 PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) titled: "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." was presented to Bush. George told the CIA briefer: "All right. You've covered your ass now." (and then Bush went on vacation for a month)
im4wur 2 years ago 8
Comment removed
im4wur 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This clod was on bill maher when bill and atheist made fun of religion(clark laughed also)-then clarke yukked it up when maher called pope a pedophile,etc
playsetman 3 years ago
lol What's your point? That anyone who doesn't believe in your God is a heathen? Hmm, interesting, that's what Al Qeada think as well.
niemanickurwa 3 years ago 4
the pope is the "president" of the catholic church....and all those priests have done things to little boys.
rurh1981 3 years ago
secret homosexuals lied about being holy men so they could get at children-those men should have been hanged-this shows why homosexuaks should never be scout masters or be allowed to adopt children-pope is not president-richard clarke was a dupe of chilton and should have been fired the day Bush took office-where was he and his advice to clinton after countless attacks?-911 was plotted for 5 years under clinton and they expected gore to win election-if gore had won,we would have had more attacks
playsetman 3 years ago
not my problem...it is the church...
rurh1981 3 years ago
dis dude is smert we nead mo peepel lik him we shood mak a stachoo fer em
crackers2012 3 years ago
Governments and Secret Services are the Terrorists.
webovisionca 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Clarke got eight years to stop terrorism but what did he do? What a loser.
custerdivision 4 years ago
One: No terrorist attack on U.S. soil for eight years until Bush took office and ignored him.
Two: Google "Project Bojinka".
BI30 4 years ago
that's a convenient counting. What did Clark and Clinton do during 8 years against Saddam Hussein or Bin Laden? Nothing. They slept. Terrorism was everywhere, US interests were attacked, but Clinton spent his time having a blowjob. And now, they are making lessons? That's almost comical.
custerdivision 4 years ago
Then I also recommend you Google: '"Wag the Dog" Osama'.
BI30 4 years ago
Custer that is a real poor history lesson there. There was nothing essential to do about Saddam - he was a trapped and broken dictator. Osama? Until 9/11 Osama did small terrorist acts and no-one including the right, supported action greater than what was done. If you recall when clinton did act, cries of wag the dog came from the right. Bush didn't recognize terror - he campaigned on star wars - hardly an anti terror program.
wittumy 4 years ago
Hey, custerdivision, who had control of Congress for seven of those eight years? The Republicans did, and they fought and sabotaged just about every one of Clinton's anti-terror efforts. Than right after 9/11 they try to revise history to make it look like Clinton was the one to blame.
The Republicans were the ones who were more concerned about Clinton's blowjob than terrorism.
Scotty7617 3 years ago 11
I know. All this "democrats are soft on terrorism..." Bogus. Clinton had the most comprehensive counter-terrorism program of any other president. Republicans criticised him for being "obsessed with bin Laden." What a bunch of hypocrites.
They don't even distort facts. They just make them up. Or completely ignore them.
unouluvme912 3 years ago 7
SCOTTY-all the repuiblicans could have done is cut funding-even the biggest democrat hack has never claimed republicans want to cut funding for military or anti-terror funds-clinton was impeached cause he offered favors to others to lie and threats to those who would not-guess you think when women are raped or bring sexual harashment charges,its about sex?it was 6 years not seven republicans controlled house-congress has 2 year terms dumbass
playsetman 3 years ago
You have no answer to BI30 do you custer? Why didn't Bush have any plans on terror prior to 9/11? Why did he not mention terror as a threat during his campaign for presidency?
wittumy 4 years ago
Everything you need to know about GWB's idea of what the most important security issue would be under his Admin is revealed in the fact he chose a professor of Russian Studies fluent in Russian to be his "National Security Advisor" (Condi Rice), despite attacks on the Kobai Towers, the American Embassies in Africa, and the attack on the Cole (in addition to warning from Clark & Berger).
BI30 4 years ago
Nice job BI30. It's unbelievable that GWB had such little regard for terrorism. His failure to act in any way after receiving the warning "Osama determined to strike in the US" galvanizes the fact that he wasn't concerned at all with terrorist groups prior to 9/11.
wittumy 4 years ago 3
if u read the 9/11 commission, he didn't ever read daily briefings like Clinton did, he had people read them for him and tell him if anything mattered
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago 3
See: The Neocons - Ideology and Fantasy
icarusinbrazil 4 years ago
Question asked, question answered.
BI30 4 years ago
Quick correction: Clinton did NOT have "ten high-probability chances" to get OBL. He had *one*, which he took and missed him by just one hour. And when he took it, the Republican Congress screamed "Wag the Dog! Wag the Dog!"
BI30 4 years ago
Finally, someone else brings up that the republicans went after Clinton when he tried to deal with Bin Laden. Thank you!
JohnNoZ35 4 years ago
Cheney, Wolfowitz and Co. are all TRUE terrorists!
TheImmoralist 5 years ago
This guy's good for a laugh
Luront 5 years ago
Do you mean Richard Clarke? Do you even know who he is?
foley15136 4 years ago
and thats about all i have to say about that
alkcfnakjhfas 5 years ago
Clinton maybe had the chance to get OBL...but it was not he who hijacked the airplanes...It was men who was living here who did it. Our goverment had chance to stop 9/11.
ELS777 5 years ago
Scheuer was never a field agent, a known partisan, and has publicly contradicted his own accusations in separate interviews. He was referred to as "Mike" in the "9/11 Commission's Report" in Chapter 4. They do not report any such pattern of criticism of Clinton by him.
NeoCons are still desperate, even six years later, to blame Clinton for Bush's failure. Sad.
BI30 5 years ago
so true, honestly the fact Scheuer doesn't even give his name in the report says it all
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
6 to 8 months in office after recountmess and Bush still had alot of Clintons left over appointee's in the administration and an information road block between FBI and CIA that was put in place by Clinton that impeeded information sharing between the two departments.Six months in office making sense of Clinton's mess and getting oriented.? Hey have you ever heard of Jamie Gurelic(sp.?)Clark is trying to salvage his reputation as well by Trashing Bush. Liberal media carries his water !
tuddy761 5 years ago
The only Clinton holdovers in the Bush Admin were Clarke and Tennet, and George gave Tennet "the Medal of Freedom". The bi-partisan "9/11 Commission" debunked the "Gorlick/wall" assertion as total nonsense.
BI30 5 years ago
yea when the intelligence report which was directly made only for bush said Osama Bin Laden may use passenger airplanes to atk the U.S. which bush most likely didn't look at, & if he did jesus christ how stupid do you have to be to not see the clear signs.
palidanek 5 years ago
notice how the peddler of that myth Kurt Weldon lost reelection in a landslide.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
This guy was the reason 9/11 happened not Bush!
RWB1980 5 years ago
Because it was Clarke that refused to discuss Terrorism until September 1st, it was Clarke that dismissed the August 6th PDB, and it was Clarke that never responded to the USS Cole bombing, right?
BI30 5 years ago
wrong...the CIA and FBI didn't want to do anything about it, it was not Clarke's fault...Clarke is a million times more competent than Bush
masudrules 5 years ago
I remember this interview. At the time I still didn't know about the "9/11 Truth Movement". Now it sounds like the whole Clarke thing, absent of the real truth, was just a diversionary, no worries, we're competently checkin n balancin ourselves here, bone for the media to spin on us.
codevictim 5 years ago
Google "9/11 Truth Movement". It is a shame that Clarke was forbidden to answer this question more candidly for fear of being covertly snuffed. Hero? Coward? We'll find out soon enough.
codevictim 5 years ago
Damn right.
Canada80 5 years ago