Added: 1 year ago
From: thewayofthemaster
Views: 20,040
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (791)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He should've stuck with making jackets. He is a real idiot.

  • That's a nice thing to do. And that jacket is amazing!

  • nice jacked.... But he should ease down on the Dawkins thing, because this is just sad

  • I'm just curious, where was god before he created space and time?

    You can't say outside of space/time because it doesn't exist, and something can not exist in nothing(including a god).

    If there already was space where god exists, why do we need a god to create space that already exists?

    God can't be omnipotent, because omnipotence is a contradiction and a logical fallacy.

    Can an omnipotent being kill itself?

    Just something to think about.

  • oh dear!

    anyways my non atheist reason not to worship god.

    If either exist hell seems a whole lot better than heaven. gods gonna be some goody two shoes. He will wear robes eat porridge, hold hands and sing songs in praise of himself. The devil on the other hand will be a bad ass who eats meat, half cooked and straight off the bone. life will just be lots of sex, lots of alcohol, and lots of drugs. knowing this why would anybody choose heaven over hell?

  • @randyroo2:  "Knowing this?" How?

  • Those are some very lovely leather jackets. Ray is much better, it doth appear, at making leather jackets than his is at making arguments. With that in mind, who knew visiting a Ray Comfort blog could be my ticket to a free leather jacket?

  • I reckon these jackets he makes have a built-in syringe filled with 'god believing juice'...when you put your arm into one of the sleeves, BAM your infected !

    ....nice try ray, nice try...

  • Basically, "Jackets don't evolve, therefore, life doesn't evolve either." Is he trying to make bad arguments? It challenges evolutionary theory in no way to say that objects we all agree didn't evolve couldn't have evolved. According to evolutionary theory, subsequent generations of a population evolve due to natural selection acting on adaptive and maladaptive genetic variation and due to genetic drift acting on neutral genetic variation. This simply doesn't apply to non-living objects.

  • Hi Ray. I'm happily a non believer of any man made religious ideas. You seem to be quite happy as a believer in one of them. Why not just be happy in your beliefs and leave those of us non believers be? We're not offering you hand-made gifts in the hopes you'll see things as we do. If we're all going to continue to share this tiny blue dot in the cosmos we've got to eventually learn to let our differences be. I'm happy you're happy. Can't you just be happy for me too?

  • so who created God?

  • @xierotron more importantly who created the being/diety who created god we got ourselves and unending spiral of who created who XD

  • @Abbadon380 well yh obviously that kinda the point of who created the creator. i love hw ray comforter says every picture has a painter to say earth must have a god but yh he says a painter (creator) must himself av a creator and kinda doesnt realise the hypocracy he spews

  • If you love and have concern for Dawkins, then stop lying about him, and learn what he's talking about.

  • So not only does Ray deny the validity of evolution but also plate tectonics (the formative process behind most mountains)?

    You can't pick and choose your science, Ray. Either you accept the methods and results of science or you deny them. You are a denier.

  • Wow. MAYBE.. and here is just a Crazy idea...

    Maybe if you didn't Plead with scientists to believe your story, and put forth a testable scientific Hypothesis, we would throw your garbage out.

  • $20k to debate Richard Dawkins.... That's just what a best-selling author needs to be tempted into a debate: money. Good thinking, Ray...

  • The jacket did not make itself, but the leather did

  • Oh, Ray, you do know how to pull a smarmy PR campaign.

  • next time he should speak the jacket into existence, then write a "holy" book on how he did it and have millions of people believe that

  • Ray made a leather jacket for Richard Dawkins? Awe, that's sweet :)

  • A tanner questions a scholar. I'm pretty sure even in the dark ages, this was laughable.

  • And the new animal was pleased to be with Adam and Eve and he wagged his tail.

    And Adam said, 'Lord, I have already named all the animals in the Kingdom and I cannot think of a name for this new animal.'

    And God said, 'I have created this new animal to be a reflection of my love for you, his name will be a reflection of my own name, and you will call him DOG.'

  • @majorl311 I doubt they spoke English so this story does not really work. If they spoke Greek which is what the bible was originally written in, then dog = skylos, and god = Theos. Cute story but does not really work for other languages.

  • @spccow Yes i am aware of this but the point is that there is a master plan where man interacts with other species in many complex ways, get the point !

  • I WANT THAT JACKET! PLEASE GIVE ME ONE RAY!

    I MIGHT CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY IF YOU GIVE ME A RAD JACKET!

  • That is one ugly jacket. When he said leather jacket, I foolishly imagined him making something you'd see at Danier. :S

  • Who would want such a gaudy jacket

  • The Creation Coat! W/ extra pockets to stuff all the propaganda in! 

  • Only Ray could believe that a jacket could evolve.

  • Converting someone is not an act of love, and trying to worm your way into the favor of non believers is as bad as converting someone. Conversion for your so-called "truth" is simply indoctrination. In the philosophical sense, truth and morals are all relative, based on belief. Belief determines perspective, and we are all no closer to reality than any other, because we all have our own perspective.

  • y r so many atheist mad at ray and call him names.?sounds like these folk r filled with hate.

  • @jwdimick74 Because he ignores certain concepts that us atheists believe, so we get mad at him for being ignorant and being arrogant in the situation.

  • @jwdimick74 That came out wrong. I meant to say that he doesn't take our concepts into consideration, he doesn't HAVE to believe our concepts, that's fine. We just want him to take a look at it and get the right look on it, and not misunderstand it. He can still think it's wrong, but we want him to make his opinion with knowing how the theory actually is said to be. For example, he said that evolution states that thinks create themselves. Evolution just tells how we evolved from one creature.

  • %#$%#!!! for the last time: EVOLUTION DOES NOT CREATE IT'S SELF!!!!!!!! ARE YOU CREATIONISTS DEFFF???

  • I'm not an atheist, can I still debate you for a jacket?

    It's just that your arguments are so terrible, I sometimes have to remind myself that you're not joking.

  • So a Leather Jacket = Mountains... wow Ray, thats brainless, even for you.

  • "Timeo Danaos et Dona Ferentes" - I fear the greeks, even when they bring gifts.

  • OMG what is that kickass song?!

  • A leather jacket didn't make itself so evolution never happened?! And you wonder why Dawkins won't debate you? You still have no clue what the theory of evolution is about Ray, yet you obviously have internet access, so why would Dawkins waste his time educating you about evolution when you can't/won't even google it and learn what it is for yourself? And FFS, evolution is not the big bang and is not abiogenesis. You have been told countless times yet you still conflate them. Please get a clue.

  • @Hamulus8 Actually, he's saying that because the jacket needed a creator to physically put the pieces in place, inanimate objects like stars and mountains needed a creator.

    Which is somehow even stupider than trying to debate evolution's validity.

    The man has obviously never heard of a volcano.

  • I can't see Dawkins in anything with tassles.

  • Ray is such a rat, he is obviously doing this to get in touch with Dawkins and is not a "expression of love and concern"

  • *sigh*. Still can't believe that this guy is a new zealander. Its somewhat disappointing

  • you're wasting your time silly head. can I have the jacket though? I'll talk to you for 20 minutes! that's a sweet deal!

  • Mr. Sir,

    You seem to only address Dawkins. Mr. Hitchens, I think, would respond that your jacket by no means was a spontaneous creation. You learned to make a jacket from someone who learned from someone etc... Somewhere in that lineage, jackets were less sturdy, made of poorer materials, not so well shaped to human contours, etc... You are forgetting those previous methods before your current one.

    Can I have a jacket and discuss my absolute apathy for Christ? =P

  • you must see the leather jacket trends 2011 @ /watch?v=LPX3FX2Nz5A

  • Dawkins wouldn't be caught dead in that jacket.

  • Did you leather jacket little baby jacks that were every so slightly different from the parent jacket and then go on to reproduce further and further till the Differences became so great that they could no longer be a considered a Jacket and maybe became things such as Hats and Socks which can no longer breed with jackets or with each other? No? Then your point a superfluous as Evolution only affects things that reproduce with variation. Try harder next time =P.

  • pause at 0:54

    any one notice the banana in the pocket?

  • @74gore LMAO!!! WOW!!... LAWL!!!!

  • Ray comfort may have created the jacket. But what he doesn't know is that the leather realy evolved from cows and the metal buttums are mede of iron that evolved through millions of years of geological pressure.

  • So that idiot made coats before? What makes you idiot creationists think a former coat-maker has any sort of say in the scientific community!?

  • What I heard him say is " You can either debate me or buy it on ebay"

  • I KNEW IT!

    I KNEW IT!

    I knew no one could be so stupid and so talentless.

    I knew you had to have some sort of talent.

    Too bad you cant even use it in a proper context.

  • i really dont think richard dawkins is the leather jacket type....

  • @zorokism

    leather pants on the other hand......

    I kid! I kid!

  • @ImAnotherZang On the other hand, it doesn't take a whole lot of savvy to bury Ray Comfort under a pile of his own BS. Thunderf00t did a bang-up job, if you haven't seen that debate. The Rational Response Squad embarassed him on national television. Maybe we could convince him to call into the Atheist Experience. They'd have a blast tearing apart his sad foundations.

  • Just another example that becoming a Christian, you actually LOVE atheists and REALLY care for them.

  • I didn't know anything about Ray Comfort the first time I saw this video. My initial reaction was that he was probably a nice guy, even if I didn't agree with him.

    Then I watched more videos and visited his blog and was saddened to learn otherwise. I wish he would've stuck with the jackets. They're genuinely beautiful. His lies and propaganda, not so much.

    The latter pays far better. though.

  • @papadrugio Too true. There is a lot of money to be made in the Jesus business.

  • Even if you didn't see Ray making he jacket you would still know it didn't make itself. But we're supposed to think the universe made itself, a la Dennett, Hawking and other atheists.

  • Perfect! This is proof positive that jackets do not make themselves. Now please post the video showing god making man.

  • It looks like Ray Comfort has one talent. That is a really snazzy jacket, and I really hope Richard Dawkins takes him up on his kind offer. Perhaps Ray should go back into the jacket-making business, he is clearly very good at it.

  • This video has caused me to respect Ray Comfort. I still think his creed is baloney and will do so until the day of my death but I can respect a man who makes things with his hands in this day and age.

  • theres a reason why Dawkins refuses to do a debate with Comfort...

    Its not really a debate if one person is talking fact & evidence & the other one has a his fingers in his ears going "lalalalalala, i can't hear you, god donnit, lalalalalala. You need to show every single trasitional form, but i dont need to provide any evidence at all cause god donnit lalalalalala, i cant hear you you immoral person, lalalalalala."

  • You should make a straitjacket for Dawkins.

  • @Creasock you seem to have confused education with mental illness.

    especially when you consider the fella making the jacket claimed that god created the universe because bananas are curved towards your face.

  • Only Ray Comfort could compare a leather jacket to the moon and stars.

  • Holy banana!! Ray has a socially relevant skill?!

  • "Ray loves atheists..."

    Then why does he continue to refer to us as "fools," "idiots," etc. when he wilfully ignores (at this point in the game, Comfort's got no excuse plead ignorance) every piece of evidence against his absurd worldview? At least Pat Robertson et al. are honest enough to admit they hate Atheists. As nutty as Comfort is, the worst public description I've heard of him is basically that he's silly.

    That said, nice jacket, and I lol'd at the banana in the pocket.

  • The banana in the pocket was a nice touch Ray. You really need to get on with your life and forget about Dawkins and the rest of us Atheists. We're enjoying life and learning more about our planet, illnesses and so many other important topics thanks to science.

    I know Catholic Priests have been busy with little boys and Muslims have been flying planes, but we have much more important tasks to do. Enjoy your banana.

  • @evadnie100 Actually thats nice looking jacket and i like that he can manufacture them. But yea, i agree how long can you still go on with that banana argument? Besides the bananas used to look totally different, until man started to "shape it", its a totally man made thing by now ;)

  • Ray, you walked away from your calling. You should have stuck to leatherworking, you're obviously extremely good at it.

  • Why does Ray Comfort even bother to try and get Richard Dawkins' attention? He is a petty, ignorant fool that is just another blip on the imbecile radar to Dawkins.

    Just give up with your pathetic preaching Comfort and go back to making jackets.

  • Ray, you're awesome. :D

  • Jackets are designed, therefore we must have been designed..........urgh what a fucken idiot!!!

  • You should stick to making leather jackets instead of spreading idiocy. You are a great tailor but no good debater.

  • how nice of him

  • I appreciate that knocking Christianity is your raison d'etre. It was once for the Apostle Paul don't forget. But I would suggest that if you wanted a little more "air time" then you realy need to reassess your approach and reasoning. I would also suggest buying the Fallacy Detective from Amazon. Auf Wiedersehen.

  • I cant help but wonder about Mr Comforts integrity. Try as i might i just cant come to the conclusion that he actually believes the concepts he is promoting.

    Good for you Mr Comfort, you saw an easy target and aimed well. Take them for every penny you can.

  • Does Ray Comfort not understand the concept of a Yandere?

  • This is such bullshit. This is just an excuse to make money.

  • So these leather jackets of his are a not-for-prophet business, huh

  • Dawkins debates PROFESSIONAL clergy. He has a great interview with the Bishop of Oxford right here on Youtube. He has even addressed Ray Comfort saying that he won't debate him because he doesn't have any discernable talents other than debating. It's too bad Christians have to lie to get their points across. People aren't stupid and will grow to detest their lies over time.

    And Ray, guys who makes frilly leather jackets for another guy because he 'loves' them is part of what subculture?

  • Did he take the jacket?

  • Comment removed

  • Dawkins should wear it, it would make Ray look like a jackass for proving that Richard is the bigger man.

  • @Stuckherewithyou Except we all know that Dawkins is not the bigger man. I'm not sure the UK has produced such an ignorant specimin.

  • Comment removed

  • @Cookey77 HAHA shut the fuck up, just shut it you clown. pathetic dimwit

  • @schmendriks You have all the debating skills of Prof Dawkins! Nice work.

  • @Cookey77 specimen*

  • @kaifroland Cheers.

  • @Cookey77 - "Except we all know that Dawkins is not the bigger man. I'm not sure the UK has produced such an ignorant specimin. " Do we? Funny how these sort of comments come from those who would gobble on a jesus cock that say it. On a seperate note, Dawkins knows how to spell specimen properly so i guess you should be looking to yourself for evidence of a more ignorant person than Dawkins....

  • @TheSpankymonkey Atheist in "simpleton foul mouth response" shocker.

  • @Cookey77 - "shocker" - Not really. Nothing shocking about a jebus gobbler who ignores the thrust of any points but to him and focuses on any tiny little detail (of absolutely no consequence to the conversation, even if right) to distract the conversation away from the point he or she can't answer to. It's ok, if it makes you feel more comfortable and gives you an air of superiority, fine by me. However let's not make claims to knowledge that we supposedly all know, when the opposite is true :-)

  • Ray Comfort comes across as quite an affable chap. He may say some daft things, but so do some of my best friends (especially when they've had a few beers). It's hard not to like him & I think that is where he scores points. Thunderfoot came unstuck because of this. regardless of the debate and the points being made - Ray came across as a nicer guy. Offering to buy lunch was probably his killer punch ;-)

    Personally, I'd love a leather jacket made by Ray, I'd need it a bit less 'frilly', though!

  • @SAHBfan says "Offering to buy lunch was probably his killer punch ;-)"

    It was a necessary courtesy, can you imagine the expenses that Thunderf00t went through ?, can this be compared to the cost of a lunch ?

  • @saintpine

    Yes, but thunderfoot's expenses weren't incurred on camera. Maybe I should have said offering to buy lunch on camera was his killer... My point was that Ray Comfort came across as an affable guy. I don't agree with a word he says - but he knows how to charm people. Thunderfoot is undoubtedly the superior intellect [/understatment] but is sometimes unnecessarily rude & antagonistic. It is surely more effective to demonstrate that someone's ideas are idiotic than to call them an idiot?

  • I hate Creationism and disagree with Ray, but I like him. He is more of a comedian really! And his show 'Way of The Master' sounds like a martial arts show.

    I tried to hate Ray but I can't!!!

  • i have to say, if he is genuine with his offer.. i'll take one. but i don't believe his offer is genuine...

  • Nice jacket.

  • I bet Ray is into "Leather"

  • There are no strings attached to this gift? I see several rows of leather strings attached to the jacket! Ray is a false prophet!

  • LOL i am almost certain this guy is just a troll. His shit seems more aimed to fuck with people and less aimed at logic and reason.

  • Ray comfort gets into my nerves...

  • The oceans, sun and stars are inanimate? really?!

  • I can see why Dawkins doesn't respond to this idiot. Other than Dennis Hopper, who'd even want a piece of crap jacket like that?

  • thats a stupid looking jacket

  • This is rediculous - using a few day old jacket to prove creationism? How about a more logical approach that science uses to prove evolution (which is proven fact) with millions of fossils, massively supporting evolution. Your choice A small book of desert scratchings (the bible) or millions of physical examples in the form of fossilized remains

  • @PnutButter1986 No more ridiculous or illogical than not being able to spell "rediculous" I suppose....

    Please learn to spell common words before attempting to debate the finer points of the origin of life. I am embarrassed for you.

  • @TrueBlueJMS So you are dismissing my point due to one small typo? A little superficial don't you think? What should I expect from an Evangelist Christian though. There is no argument for the existence of God when all you have is the theory. This is the difference - Evolutionists massively support their theories with evidence which is independent from the theory. Creationists try to prove their theory with the theory itself. A totally circular and non empirical argument.

  • @PnutButter1986 I think the word you are looking for is Evangelical, not Evangelist. The word "evangelist" in that context wouldn't be capitalized, even if it were the correct word. Also, a question mark belongs at the end of that sentence.

    You have thoroughly proven to everyone that you are wholly incapable of grasping even the most rudimentary rules of English.

  • @TrueBlueJMS I think the perfect term to describe you is a grammatically anally retentive spell-checking moron, who skirts the obvious argument that these 'representatives' of God are slightly less moronic than you. Your criticism of my small grammatical mistakes hardly debunks evolution now does it?

    You're so keen to 'prove to everyone' that I can't write and in so doing you've rendered your argument to void my point wholly irrelevant.

    Your anal self and Ray Comfort should be in care.

  • Richard has already stated elsewhere, that by agreeing to enter into a debate with a creationist, he would therefore be acknowledging them and giving them status that (for them) validates their arguement. Why bother? Why give them what they want? Let the Faith-Heads play in their little corner with their little bibles under the watchful eyes of their little-man-on-a-stick. The rest of us have lives to live.

  • So... six months now... is Mr. Comfort still making these? He he he... he'll be making jackets for quite a while...

  • this would explain why he is such a crummy debater.

    He is already a master at another trade.

    Stick to the jackets Ray, I would buy one. lol

    But, I certainly don't but anything else you produce.

  • i think i would have some sort of respect for ray confort if he still was making lether jackets instead of pedaling all his creationist bullshit! (no bannana man but lether jacket man) how u like that ray! ;)

  • That seems like a nice thing to do, making the Jacket for Richard (not sure if he's sincere about it, really), but something nicer to do would be to gain a better understanding of what evolution is, and to stop mischaracterizing it.

  • "It would take him 1 1/2 hours with a machine and 30 hours without."

    Thank the Lord God that He, in His infinite wisdom, invented the sewing machine. Seriously, though, that's a pretty slick jacket.

  • @Ultracity6060 How about giving the humans (that actually existed) the credit for inventing the sewing machine. No not thank God - Thank Isaac Singer, or Elias Howe, or how about Barthelemy Thimonnier? All mortals - all real. Stop letting an imaginary cloud deity take all the credit

  • @PnutButter1986 Adjust your sarcasm filters, good sir.

  • @Ultracity6060 Aah yes I see, how clumsy of me. I seem to have crossed swords with a fellow lover of logic. I believe in the British army they would call that 'blue on blue'. Peace be with you - and down with the Comfort!

  • Once again, Ray Comfort's message in a nutshell: "I don't understand the process by which the stars and planets are created. Without knowledge of this process, I will assume that the choices are either that they were magically made by a super-powered invisible omnipotent entity or that they poofed into existence from nothing. And since the second choice doesn't fit my belief system, the first choice must be correct." Ray, why not actually look up some of this stuff first?

  • I don't understand why Dawkins won't debate Ray. Richard Dakwins will destroy him.

  • @HaveFaithInScience Dawkins has actually addressed this - basically, he thinks it would be a waste of his time. And as amusing as it would be for us to watch, he has a good point.

  • "" they put their fingers in their ears and say, la la la ""

    I'm sure he doesn't need your money.

  • Despite the fact that Comfort is a close minded bigot, I WANT THAT JACKET!!!!

  • pretty gay jacket... please send me one any way ray. it would be a great conversation peice

  • Lol, sell it out to E-Bay, not surprised. Oh Ray Comfort. If you think the banana is made so well for the mouth, I guess God made the hand perfect for the...well, wait, why did God make the human hand perfectly designed for masturbation?

  • lol...the Simplest Thing of All is Faith. a baby can have it, & sit there being Cool, while fellas like you blah blah blah!

    yes, it can all become very complex! the complexity is just God's means of keeping the blah blah blah out of Heaven.

  • You should have stuck to making jackets.

  • did he take the jacket lol?

  • Ray Comfort is the absolute bomb! I think everyone could do with same kind of love and generosity that he is clearly showing in this vid.

  • @MissLoveAndFaith - Hahaha, the love really does shine.

  • Comment removed

  • Can the jacket reproduce with genetic mutation into environmental variation allowing for natural selection? No, then the creation of your jacket not analagous to the development and evolution of the secies. And, for the record, the origins of the mountains, oceans, the sun and the moon all are known and are natural and have nothing to do with Darwinian evolution.

  • man i wish dawkins would debate that lil pip squeak just for my own enjoyment

  • too frilly.

  • what a gay jacket.

  • Wow that jacket actually looks really good!

    I guess that's what Ray Comfort is best at. XD

  • This leather working should be encouraged. Unlike his other work, Ray is actually contributing to society when he's making jackets.

  • @IAimToMisbehave42 we should visit him and let him know he is making his jackets wrong, i have no idea how to make a jacket... but the TRUTH says he is making his jackets wrong

  • If you shall confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, & believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved.Romans10:9

    For God sent not His Son into the world to condemn the world;but that the world through Him might be saved.

    He that believes on Him is not condemned:but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.John3:17-18

    For whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.Romans10:13

  • @58seas you are not worth my time, enjoy a life of ignorance

  • Dear everyone on this page,

    do not reply to 58seas, doing so simply validates that he has a valid argument against evolution. No matter how much evidence, journal articles, web pages, science textbooks, ect that you direct him to he is set in his ignorance. i do realize that i myself have replied to several of his comments but i have recently come to this realization. just let him be happy being ignorant, for thats what he is and will always be

  • Creationists will never change their minds like a light switch no matter what you write .Deconversion is a long slow process .

  • Evidence for evolution fills over 600 libraries ,The accumulated knowledge of biology , paleontology is impressive and that's not counting the same books twice . Fundamentalists would prefer to stick with a few pages of scripture than have to bother with modern science .

  • @flyingscience The problem with this so-called evidence you talk about is that it tries to use down-hill or micro-evolution to prove up-hill or macroevolution. Compare some of you findings with evolutionfacts. com

  • @58seas Down hill /up hill is strange creationist lingo . macro evolution is now documented hundreds of times in multiple marine species (where fossils exist by the billions) . Please google 28 evidences for macro evolution for broad catagories listed .

  • @58seas Macro rvolution has been observed in modern living life .New species exist today that didnt exist 100 years ago . Species increase over time this is undeniable . Creationist put on mental blinders and shut it all out and shrug off mainstream science .

  • @flyingscience I've read&once believed this stuff your saying.I really do understand why you believe evolution but you are the one who is looking at only one side.I really wish you'd read the handbook on evolutionfacts . com. I really do have so mush info but it's difficult to get my point across here.I consider you to be an intelligent person so if evol is true then just reading the info on the site I recommended won't harm your views. By the way micro has been observed not macro.

  • @58seas Anyone at a computer has access to several hundred libraries worth of evidence on evolution .Evidence of special instant creation is ZERO . Creationists have a stubborn mind to ignore and dismiss all contrary points of view .

  • False Comfort, I mean Ray Comfort.

  • Before you made that, it was already a jacket on a cow. Living things can evolve, no one says inanimate things do, except for you.

  • Where did the leather come from? Anybody seen Kirk lately?

  • Kinda creepy...why is Comfort trolling for atheist emails?

  • This is so fucking stupid. I hardly know what to say...How long will these creationists continue to take the moral highground and say how much they "love" atheists and how much they care for them...bullshit! They love their false comfort and their fucked up logic! They want ppl to think: shit, these ppl love me? hahahahahalmfaorofl. They love you about as much as god does...enough to send your ass straight to hell!.....such a profound statement of love dontcha think?

  • "i made this [tacky leather jacket] out of my love and concern for you"

  • this is the most (and probably the only) awesome thing you've ever done, dude. Nice job. That jacket is beautiful. I don't usually comment on your atheist central blog, but I might, especially if, if I somehow win, you donate the proceeds from the eBay auction to a charity, like Habitat for Humanity, or the Salvation Army (heck, send THEM my jacket!), or Medicins sans Frontiers (probably spelled wrong, known as Doctors without Borders in the USA) or some other charity that gives direct aid.

  • I just cannot for the life of me understand how you refuse to get into your skull that if the solution to who or what made the "moon, oceans and all living things" is "God" then you are back to square one. infact, you are worse off, because you've pushed the problem of "how did this complex stuff get here?" to "how did an infinite intelligence get here?" Complexity evolves out of simplicity. We know this because we have mountains of evidence and observations to back it up.

  • the funny thing about this is that Dawkins didn't tell him how to make the jacket. Comfort loves to tell biologists how to do our job

  • Yes thats right, every evolutionary scientist is making up evidence, they all get together and say, 'hey i know what will be a good idea, lets make up evolution just for the sake of some fun and to piss of religious people', sounds viable to me. Dont pray in my school and i wont think in your church. FSM be praised!!!!

  • @millsy4321 That makes absolutely no sense. As usual this is an atheist spin. Who said scientist are making up evidence? Lets look at some facts and feel free to point out if I am wrong. 1. Microevolutionary changes occur. 2. There is no proof via a fossil timeline that we can chronologically get from creation of life to homo sapien. 3. Believing that we came from apes requires a leap of faith due to lack of evidence to prove it actually happened. Dont lie to my kids and I wont 2 yours

  • @drjackflash How is that aethist spin, don't you realise there a christians who also beleive in evolution Also your overview of science is quite obsurd, science employs experiments to obtain data and hence create theories, but theories are always changing so a scientist will never say this is how it works and thats it It just happens that most data collected for evolution points out that we are a deccedant of the great apes. I'm not going to start arguing points for evolution as i don't study it

  • @drjackflash Another point, I dont actually have any kids as im only 19, the point here is I know more about science the ray comfort does, but the scary thing is alot more people will be willing to listen to what he said then I do. So by saying im lying then that means when i observe something in the physical world and tell people my results then I am lying. One of the worst thing some one can do in the field of science is fake their results.

  • A bubble is beautifull, a cristal is beautiflull, so there must be a bubble good, or a cristal good. Science can explain that, as well as science can explain the jacket, but no theist on this or any world can explain good...

  • I love Ray Comfort, too! I wish he would open his brain and start intelligently talking about the world and universe so he can become a useful member of society. Also, props to Ray Comfort for allowing ratings and comments. That puts him above 90% of christians in morality and open thought.